SURVEY ON LRMDS

Indicator:
4 Very Satisfactory
3 Satisfactory
2 Not satisfactory
1 Needs Improvement
Direction: For each of the following statements, check the box which best reflects your judgement of the materials

4 3 2 1
INDICATORS
VS S NS N.S
A. CONTENT
1. Content is accurate
2. Content support the K-12 Basic education Curriculum
3. Scope (range) and depth of topics are appropriate to learner’s needs
4. Level of difficulty is appropriate for the learner per grade level
5. Content reflects the community and parents’ Indigenous practices, values and goals

B. INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN
1. Material promotes the learner’s community engagement
2. Material encourages group interaction
3. Material encourages pupils to work independently
4. Materials are well organized and structured
5. Text related to visuals
C. TECHNICAL DESIGN
1. Visual design is interesting/ effective
2. Character size/ type, face is appropriate
3. Users can easily employ the resources
4. Has many illustrations and at least a picture for each page of text
5. Pictures are big, easy to understand and appropriate to the target learner

MONITORING PLAN FOR LRMDS

 1. SEMINARS

DATE
TITLE OF SEMINAR (MM/DD/YR) SPONSORED BY/ PRODUCT/ OUTPUT
Name of Teacher Position TOTAL HOURS
ATTENDED CONDUCTED BY PRODUCED
FROM TO
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.

2. MONITORING TOOL ON AVAILABLE LEARNING RESOURCES IN SCHOOL LIBRARY

TYPE OF MATERIAL NUMBER OF
TITLE OF LEARNING QUALITY ASSURANCE
(MODULE/ ACTIVITY SHEET/ FLASH CARDS/ AUTHOR COMPETENCY GRADE (SCHOOL LEVEL/ DIVISION LEVEL/ REGIONAL COPIES
MATERIAL CHART/ INTERACTIVE SLIDE DECK/
LEVEL/ NATIONAL LEVEL)
EDUCATIONAL VIDEO/ STORIES) REPRODUCED

3. FORMAT OF LOG SHEET IN THE UTILIZATION OF LEARNING MATERIALS

 TITLE OF LEARNING DATE BORROWED SIGNATURE
NAME GRADE SIGNATURE DATE RETURNED
MATERIAL (MM/DD/YR) (MM/DD/YR)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.