Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Environmental Chemistry:
Undergraduate and Graduate
Classroom, Laboratory, and Local
Community Learning Experiences
Sponsored by the
ACS Division of Environmental Chemistry, Inc.
The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of American National
Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials,
ANSI Z39.48n1984.
All Rights Reserved. Reprographic copying beyond that permitted by Sections 107 or 108
of the U.S. Copyright Act is allowed for internal use only, provided that a per-chapter fee of
$40.25 plus $0.75 per page is paid to the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc., 222 Rosewood
Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, USA. Republication or reproduction for sale of pages in this
book is permitted only under license from ACS. Direct these and other permission requests
to ACS Copyright Office, Publications Division, 1155 16th Street, N.W., Washington, DC
20036.
The citation of trade names and/or names of manufacturers in this publication is not to be
construed as an endorsement or as approval by ACS of the commercial products or services
referenced herein; nor should the mere reference herein to any drawing, specification,
chemical process, or other data be regarded as a license or as a conveyance of any right
or permission to the holder, reader, or any other person or corporation, to manufacture,
reproduce, use, or sell any patented invention or copyrighted work that may in any way be
related thereto. Registered names, trademarks, etc., used in this publication, even without
specific indication thereof, are not to be considered unprotected by law.
As a rule, only original research papers and original review papers are
included in the volumes. Verbatim reproductions of previous published papers
are not accepted.
9. Mapping of Brownfield Properties in the Detroit Community Using GIS ..... 125
Alexa Rihana-Abdallah and Yuncong Pang
vii
Indexes
viii
Preface
“We do not inherit this land from our parents. We borrow it from our children.”
- Amish saying, or Native American Proverb, or Chief Seattle
ix
a second example of students involved in collecting data on environmental
chemistry in the Arctic with their report of the analysis of atmospheric mercury
and flame retardants. We conclude the volume with Rihana-Abdallah and Pang’s
summary (Chapter 9) of brownfields in both Michigan and Detroit, a city that has
played a major role in the industrialization of America.
We believe this book has the potential to become an important piece of the
greater mosaic that is an understanding of the factors which make up the chemistry
of our local, regional, and global environment, and to make the current ideas and
this discussion available to a much wider audience. We hope that the chapters
herein inspire our readers to execute further projects and deeper study of our local
and greater environment. It is indeed worth remembering that we only borrow
what we use today from our children’s generation.
x
Chapter 1
This Study
The authors developed a blended face-to-face and distance lecture and
lab-based course that interweaves Alaska and Arctic-relevant issues throughout
the curriculum, emphasizing chemical principles and their roles in the
environment. This course incorporates active learning in several forms as
well as faculty-directed and peer-mentored research projects. In keeping with
best practices (45), the curriculum deliberately integrates the face-to-face and
distance courses by mixing student teams to facilitate the development of learning
relationships between students. We have intentionally designed an environmental
chemistry course that involves students as both researchers and peer mentors to
strengthen the sense of a learning community among participants. This course
engages students in all aspects of the research cycle, including: developing
laboratory techniques, applying the scientific method, making and recording
careful observations, interpreting numerical data, and sharing their results.
3
Thus, entry-level students learn introductory chemical concepts by engaging in
faculty-directed research and exploring the status of environmental health in
Arctic ecosystems and communities.
Rationale
In this chapter, we describe a model for a lab-based course offered
simultaneously by on-campus and distance modalities in which chemistry is
taught in the context of Arctic environmental health. The target demographics are
early career or nontraditional undergraduate students regardless of their physical
location within Alaska or declared major of study. As a core-designated course,
this course is accessible and attractive to students from diverse majors of study
and will hopefully serve as a mechanism to build science literacy across the state.
Distance learning is a particularly important method of instruction for Alaska
because, being the largest state in the United States, it has many rural communities
that are separated by large distances and not connected by roads (Figure 1). In
2000, Alaska had less than 13,000 miles of public road (46). In fact, several
unique factors can impact the student experience at distance campuses or in rural
communities in Alaska compared to most locations in the rest of the U.S. These
include: limited bandwidth for internet connectivity, below freezing temperatures
for most of the academic year, and most outlying communities are not connected to
the road system, meaning materials have to be transported either by water during
the summer or by air. All of these factors must be taken into account when planning
a successful lab and field-based distance course like the one described here.
The University of Alaska system has a high proportion of non-traditional
and rural students. It is common for students to take courses online, though
there are currently few offerings in chemistry or that incorporate research, and
few undergraduate environmental chemistry courses (distance or face-to-face),
especially targeting early undergraduates. This was seen as a great opportunity to
make chemistry relevant for our students by applying it to the Arctic environment
where they live and capitalizing on faculty research expertise. This course was
designed to attract students early in their post-secondary education in order to
provide a course-based lab and peer-mentored research experience by distance, in
hopes of improving STEM recruitment and retention.
Students are expected to come to this course with no previous research
experience. They are guided through small but highly relevant research projects
examining surface waters from their home communities. The project portion is
intentionally designed to involve students as both researchers and peer mentors
(Figure 2). In cooperation with other members of their research teams (which
are ideally mixed between face-to-face and distance students), students examine
water quality indicators within the context of human, animal, and ecosystem
health. In this way, we are directly incorporating One Health relevant research
into the curriculum in a way that is accessible to students with little prior science
knowledge.
4
Figure 1. This course is offered in both distance and on-campus modalities to
allow students in rural communities across Alaska to participate and build
relationships with students on-campus. Alaska has unique challenges, including
a very limited road system.
5
Enrollments were capped such that there was a limit of twice as many
face-to-face students as distance students, to best facilitate the integrated group
research projects with mixed teams of distance and on-campus students. The
ratio of distance to face-to-face students with regards to this course and student
success has not yet been thoroughly tested, and are open to adjustment in the
future depending on the composition of the research groups in future deliveries.
Each of these student learning outcomes were integrated throughout the entire
course, through synchronous lecture, discussion, laboratory, and peer-mentored
research activities as described below.
6
Implementation
7
Table 1. Tentative Course Schedule. Lecture topics, case studies and
laboratory experiments are tightly coupled to facilitate student learning.
Wk. Topic Case Study Laboratory
0 Course Introduction
1 Labor Day The Obligation to 1: Safety and Scientific
Intro. to Env. Chem. Endure Method
2 Air Quality Bear Trouble 2: Air Quality Models
and Intro. to pH
3 Introduction to Water Regulating Triclosan 3: Water Quality and
Quality Contamination
4 Water Quality and PCB Transport in the 4: Sampling Surface
Treatment Arctic Water
5 Water Quality of Sulfolane 5: Surface Water Analysis
Groundwater
6 Marine Water Quality Ocean Acidification 6: Marine Water and
Ocean Acidification
7 Contaminant none 7: Contaminant
Transformations Partitioning
EXAM 1
8 Weathering and Soil Permanent Permafrost 9: Weathering and Soil
Formation Formation
9 Metals and Inorganic Pebble Mine 10: Soil Quality and
Contaminants Contamination
10 Environmental Coliforms in Antarctica 8: Microbial World
Microbiology I
11 Environmental Biodegradation of Oil 11: Biodiversity and
Microbiology II Biomagnification
12 Ecological Interactions Bioaccumulation in the No lab
Thanksgiving Arctic
13 Forrest Fires and Glacier Bay Succession Group work on
Ecological Succession presentations
14 Climate Change in the Climate Change Data 14: Energy Sources and
Arctic Climate Change
15 EXAM 2
3:15-5:15 pm Final Exam- Student Presentations
Context-Driven Chemistry
8
chemistry, thereby giving students the opportunity to see how scientists were
actively using environmental chemistry to solve real-world problems.
Weekly case studies from poplar news or science articles or National Center
for Case Study Teaching in Science (NCCSTS; (52)) were chosen for their
environmental and/or Arctic themed relevance. These formed the basis for
discussion board topics, in which a few discussion prompts were posted each week
to facilitate student sharing. Some of the prompts focused on comprehension of
the issues, while others focused on student reactions and the impacts students had
observed in their home communities. Participating in discussion forums (both
posting and replies) was a required part of the course for all students.
Figure 3. Lab manual and lab kit developed for the course through a
collaboration with eScience Labs.
During the first offering of the course, the instructors held regular office
hours both in person for face-to-face students and online through LMS to answer
any questions that students might have regarding performing lab experiments.
However, there were very few procedural questions, a testament to the excellent
lab kit we produced. During the first course offering, the instructional team
also met weekly to create videos demonstrating how to perform each laboratory
experiment. In future offerings, these videos will be pre-loaded on the lab kit
tablets and hosted online to offer maximum support for students while minimizing
the required bandwidth.
Several virtual labs were used when the content was either not available or too
hazardous to be delivered by air mail. For example, a virtual lab exploring aquatic
macroinvertebrates was used instead of a real pond dip because by the 10th week of
the semester most surface water in Alaska is frozen (Table 1). We also endeavored
to find virtual labs that would be self-supporting or require minimal bandwidth.
On-campus labs relied on the same laboratory manual and experiments as
distance students received in mailed the lab kits. This provides an educationally
equivalent opportunity for all students enrolled in the course. On-campus labs
have the advantage of being less expensive to run and the lab fees are lower for
the on-campus students relative to the distance students because supplies can be
purchased in bulk, do not have to be packed into an individual lab kit, and supplies
can be used by several courses to minimize costs.
10
Lab Safety
Results
The technical aspects of the distance delivery of the course worked very
smoothly. There were very few questions relating to performing the lab, despite
all students being distance students. Distance delivery of lectures via the LMS
was quite smooth and in the rare cases that students were not able to attend class
synchronously they could still watch the lecture videos. Both instructors attended
and participated in all lectures during the term, which brought diverse perspectives
and energy to the presentation of material, and guest lecturers provided additional
expertise in specific topics and brought new perspectives into the classroom.
One of the most successful parts of the course was the weekly asynchronous
discussions, where students interacted above and beyond the requirements by
continuing to discuss in a thoughtful way with each other. The self-perpetuating
nature of student interactions and depth of student contributions was one of the
main successes and joys of the course for the instructional team.
12
First Offering Challenges
The first offering of this course did not conform exactly to the model we
proposed above. The course attracted only three students, all juniors or seniors,
and all enrolled in the distance course. Students all lived in locations connected to
the road system served by the USPS and did not have problems with bandwidth.
This was largely attributed to the course first being offered as a trial course that
did not fulfill a graduation requirement. However, the course has since gained core
designation, which will hopefully help in recruiting our target demographic in the
future. We would also like to build relationships with rural campuses to help with
future recruitment.
Formative and summative evaluation of the course was built in from the
beginning using an external evaluator who performed pre- and post-assessment
of student attitudes and learning, which were anonymized and withheld from the
instructional team until after grades were assigned. With the small class size, it
is impossible to generate statistically relevant results. However, both of the two
students who participated in both the pre and post surveys reported increased
likelihood in response to the question, “How likely is it that your eventual career
will directly pertain to the environmental field?” Students also reported a strong
integration between lab and lecture.
Below are representative student quotes received in the semester-end
evaluations:
“The labs were straight forward, and the action of sampling from a field
site was a very enriching experience that really tied the class to local
issues.”
“The water project was very unique, and helpful to seeing the connections
of water parameters and the topics of many lectures, and how they
connect to the environment.”
13
“I liked the amount of communication with the other class members
throughout the semester. I liked having to read and respond to discussion
board posts, but not being required to communicate any more often or
seriously than that. I was glad I could work independently on the labs
and weren’t required to collaborate with others for those.”
“I’m not sure that the lab was super useful to me. I definitely felt as if it
was intended for people that had not worked at all in science before. I
liked the overall course content, but the lab felt very simplistic.”
The tone of most of these comments suggest that, although there are some
things the instructional team can improve upon, students valued the course’s Arctic
focus and it would be appropriate for our target demographic.
Future Work
This course was fully developed in summer and first offered in Fall 2015
as a trial course and has since been approved for a core designation, which also
involved moving from a 3-credit to a 4-credit course. This corresponds to an extra
hour of lecture per week from the 2015 offering, which will be used to incorporate
more active learning strategies, facilitate more in-class discussion, and increase
collaboration between on-campus and distance students. It is important for faculty
to not just deliverer content and facilitate discussion during synchronous lecture,
but also to actively engage with students in all facets of the course, including
discussion forums, laboratory activities, etc. Additional data from future offerings
will allow for long-term data collection on enrollments, recruitment, and STEM
retention.
Unfortunately, subsequent offerings of the course have not yet occurred due
to other unrelated constraints. Future offerings will also grow the water quality
data sets generated by students within the course. Specifically, we are looking to
collect data on basic water quality across the state, a property that is lacking (54)
and to present this accumulated data in an online venue for public access.
The next phase of this project will involve developing an interactive map
to display student-collected data from the class in a publically available venue
(Figure 4). In this way, students can contribute to publically available data on
Alaska’s surface water. This could eventually serve as a resource for policy makers
and scientists in identifying surface water quality concerns and faciliate resource
managment decision making.
Potential extensions for the course could include community engagement
activities to discuss water quality and/or environmental issues, and to contribute
to our knowledge of natural Arctic waters. Partnerships with satellite campuses
may also bring mutual benefits of increased enrollments and additional pathways
for students to pursue their educational dreams.
14
Figure 4. Collection of student-generated data in an interactive map describing
status of surface water quality in the state of Alaska.
Conclusions
This course model describes translatable models for the implementation of an
integrated face-to-face and distance laboratory, and a course-based peer-mentored
research component. The contextually driven laboratory and research activities
may especially serve rural/nontraditional students by identifying issues relevant to
their local community and environment. Part of this course’s success is improving
students’ self-identity within science and capitalizing on issues students care about
as a mechanism to increase engagement. Our model is specific to Alaska and the
Arctic, but the course content can be tailored through case studies, peer-mentored
research projects, and exploration of location-relevant environmental issues to
other ecosystems. We welcome interest in translating this course model to other
ecosystems through collaborative projects.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to gratefully acknowledge Chris Iceman, Annie Chartrand,
and the Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry for their participation
and support of the class. Also, the invaluable contributions of several UAF
Biomedical Learning and Student Training (BLaST) Learning, Research, and
Training Technicians (LRTTs): Lori Gildehaus, Johanna Green, and Theresa
Vertigan for their guest lectures and contributions to the lab. The UAF eLearning
staff, especially Madara Mason and Christin Bouffard for their support in
course development through the UAF Chancellor’s Innovation in Technology
and eLearning (CITE) Fellows Program. Our collaborators at eScience Labs,
15
especially Scott Higgins, Ellen Thompson, and Valarie Houghton for taking
on this course as a labor of love. Our external evaluator, Lori Sowa, nd the
UAF Alaska Summer Research Academy (ASRA) program for supporting the
translation of this work to middle and high school audiences. Support for this
project was provided by the UAF Office of Undergraduate Research and Scholarly
Activities through a 2015 Mentor Award, and the UAF BLaST program through
a Curriculum Development Project. Research reported in this publication was
supported by the National Institute Of General Medical Sciences of the National
Institutes of Health under Award Numbers UL1GM118991, TL4GM118992, or
RL5GM118990. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does
not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
References
1. Parravano, C. Let Environmental Chemistry Enrich Your Curriculum. J.
Chem. Educ. 1988, 65 (3), 235–237.
2. Kegley, S. E.; Stacy, A. M. Environmental Chemistry in the Freshman
Laboratory. J. Chem. Educ. 1993, 70 (2), 151–152.
3. Swan, J. A.; Spiro, T. G. Context in Chemistry: Integrating Environmental
Chemistry with the Chemistry Curriculum. J. Chem. Educ. 1995, 72 (11),
967–970.
4. Wenzel, T. J.; Austin, R. N. Environmental Chemistry in the Undergraduate
Laboratory. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35 (15), 327A–331A.
5. Tomasik, J. H.; Lecaptain, D.; Murphy, S.; Martin, M.; Knight, R. M.;
Harke, M. A.; Burke, R.; Beck, K.; Acevedo-Polakovich, I. D. Island
Explorations: Discovering Effects of Environmental Research-Based Lab
Activities on Analytical Chemistry Students. J. Chem. Educ. 2014, 91 (11),
1887–1894.
6. Mahaffy, P. G.; Holme, T. A.; Martin-Visscher, L.; Martin, B. E.;
Versprille, A.; Kirchoff, M.; Mckenzie, L.; Towns, M. Beyond “Inert”
Ideas to Teaching General Chemistry from Rich Contexts: Visualizing
the Chemistry of Climate Change (VC3). J. Chem. Educ. 2017, 94 (8),
1027–1035.
7. Richter-Menge, J.; Overland, J. E.; Mathis, J. T. Arctic Report Card, 2016.
http://www.arctic.noaa.gov/Report-Card (accessed December 11, 2017).
8. Gallant, A. L.; Binnian, E. F.; Omernik, J. M.; Shasby, M. B. Ecoregions of
Alaska; U. S. Geological Survey: Washington, DC, 1995.
9. Hall, J. V.; Frayer, W. E.; Wilen, B. O. Status of Alaska Wetlands; U. S. Fish
and Wildlife Service: Anchorage, AK, 1994; p 36.
10. Hoferkamp, L.; Hermanson, M. H.; Muir, D. C. G. Current Use Pesticides in
Arctic Media; 2000–2007. Sci. Total Environ. 2010, 408 (15), 2985–2994.
11. Cozzetto, K.; Chief, K.; Dittmer, K.; Brubaker, M.; Gough, R.; Souza, K.;
Ettawageshik, F.; Wotkyns, S.; Opitz-Stapleton, S.; Duren, S.; Chavan, P.
Climate Change Impacts on the Water Resources of American Indians and
Alaska Natives in the U.S. Clim. Change 2013, 120 (3), 569–584.
16
12. Himes-Cornell, A.; Kasperski, S. Assessing Climate Change Vulnerability in
Alaska’s Fishing Communities. Fisheries Res. 2015, 162 (Supplement C),
1–11.
13. Ruscio, B. A.; Brubaker, M.; Glasser, J.; Hueston, W.; Hennessy, T. W. One
Health – a Strategy for Resilience in a Changing Arctic. Int. J. Circumpolar
Health 2015, 74, DOI: 10.3402/ijch.v74.27913.
14. Wilson, N. J. The Politics of Adaptation: Subsistence Livelihoods and
Vulnerability to Climate Change in the Koyukon Athabascan Village of
Ruby, Alaska. Human Ecol. 2013, 42 (1), 87–101.
15. Lynn, K.; Daigle, J.; Hoffman, J.; Lake, F.; Michelle, N.; Ranco, D.;
Viles, C.; Voggesser, G.; Williams, P. The impacts of climate change on
tribal traditional foods. Clim. Change 2013, 120 (3), 545–556.
16. American Veterinary Medical Association. One Health: A New Professional
Imperative; One Health Initiative Task Force: Final Report, American
Veterinary Medical Association, 2008.
17. Centers for Disease Control. One Health. https://www.cdc.gov/onehealth/
index.html (accessed December 11, 2017).
18. Kenny, S. S.; Alberts, B.; Booth, W. C.; Glaser, M.; Glassick, C. E.;
Ikenberry, S. O.; Jamiseson, K. H.; O’neil, R. M.; Reid-Wallace, C.; Tein,
C.-L.; Yang, C. N. Reinventing Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint
for America’s Research Universities; Boyer Comission on Educating
Undergraduates in the Research University, 1998.
19. Tomasik, J. H.; Cottone, K. E.; Heethuis, M. T.; Mueller, A. Development and
Preliminary Impacts of the Implementation of an Authentic Research-Based
Experiment in General Chemistry. J. Chem. Educ. 2013, 90 (9), 1155–1161.
20. Winkelmann, K.; Keeney-Kennicutt, W.; Fowler, D.; Macik, M.
Development, Implementation, and Assessment of General Chemistry Lab
Experiments Performed in the Virtual World of Second Life. J. Chem. Educ.
2017, 94 (7), 849–858.
21. Murray, D. H.; Obare, S. O.; Hageman, J. H. Early Research: A Strategy for
Inclusion and Student Success. In The Power and Promise of Early Research;
Murray, D. H., Obare, S. O., Hageman, J. H., Eds.; ACS Symposium Series
1231; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2016; pp 1−32.
22. Clark, T. M.; Ricciardo, R.; Weaver, T. Transitioning from Expository
Laboratory Experiments to Course-Based Undergraduate Research in
General Chemistry. J. Chem. Ed . 2016, 93, 56–63.
23. Council for Undergraduate Research. CUR Fact Sheet. http://www.cur.org/
about_cur/fact_sheet (accessed December 11, 2017).
24. Wilson, Z.; Holmes, L.; Degravelles, K.; Sylvain, M.; Batiste, L.;
Johnson, M.; Mcguire, S.; Pang, S.; Warner, I. Hierarchical Mentoring:
A Transformative Strategy for Improving Diversity and Retention in
Undergraduate STEM Disciplines. J. Sci. Ed. Technol. 2012, 21 (1),
148–156.
25. Haeger, H.; Fresquez, C. Mentoring for Inclusion: The Impact of Mentoring
on Undergraduate Researchers in the Sciences. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 2016,
15 (3), ar36.
17
26. Hutchison, A. R.; Atwood, D. A. Research with First- and Second-Year
Undergraduates: A New Model for Undergraduate Inquiry at Research
Universities. J. Chem. Educ. 2002, 79 (1), 125.
27. Hayes, S. M. In Best Practices for Supporting and Expanding Undergraduate
Research in Chemistry; Gourley, B., Jones, R., Eds.; American Chemical
Society: Washington, DC, in press.
28. Bland, C.; Taylor, A.; Shollenberger, S. Feature: Mentoring
Systems: Benefits and Challenges of Diverse Mentoring
Partnerships. https://www.aamc.org/members/gfa/faculty_vitae/146014/
mentoring_systems.html (accessed December 11, 2017).
29. Cho, C. S.; Ramanan, R. A.; Feldman, M. D. Defining the Ideal Qualities
of Mentorship: A Qualitative Analysis of the Characteristics of Outstanding
Mentors. Am. J. Med. 2011, 124 (5), 453–458.
30. Garman, K. A.; Wingard, D. L.; Reznik, V. Development of Junior Faculty’s
Self-Efficacy: Outcomes of a National Center of Leadership in Academic
Medicine. Acad. Med. 2001, 76 (10), S74–S76.
31. Feldman, M. D.; Arean, P. A.; Marshall, S. J.; Lovett, M.; O’Sullivan, P.
Does Mentoring Matter: Results from a Survey of Faculty Mentees at a Large
Health Sciences University. Med. Educ. Online 2010.
32. Gloria, A. M.; Robinson Kurpius, S. E. Influences of Self-Beliefs, Social
Support, and Comfort in the University Environment on the Academic
Nonpersistence Decisions of American Indian Undergraduates. Cult.
Divers. Ethnic Min. Psychol. 2001, 7, 88–102.
33. Sambunjak, D.; Straus, S. E.; Marusic, A. A Systematic Review of
Qualitative Research on the Meaning and Characteristics of Mentoring in
Academic Medicine. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 2010, 25 (1), 72–78.
34. Lopatto, D. Undergraduate Research as a High-Impact Student Experience.
Peer Rev. 2010, 12 (2).
35. Morganson, V. J.; Major, D. A.; Streets, V. N.; Litano, M. L.; Myers, D.
P. Using Embeddedness Theory To Understand and Promote Persistence in
STEM Majors. Career Dev. Q. 2015, 63 (4), 348–362.
36. Lasry, N.; Mazur, E.; Watkins, J. Peer Instruction: From Harvard to the Two-
Year College. Am. J. Phys. 2008, 76 (11), 1066–1069.
37. Amaral, K. E.; Vala, M. What Teaching Teaches: Mentoring and the
Performance Gains of Mentors. J. Chem. Educ. 2009, 86 (5), 630–633.
38. Harrison, M.; Dunbar, D.; Ratmansky, L.; Boyd, K.; Lopatto, D.
Classroom-Based Science Research at the Introductory Level: Changes in
Career Choices and Attitude. CBE Life Sci. Educ. 2011, 10 (3), 279–286.
39. Rowland, S.; Pedwell, R.; Lawrie, G.; Lovie-Toon, J.; Hung, Y. Do We
Need To Design Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences for
Authenticity? CBE Life Sci. Educ. 2016, 15 (4), ar79.
40. Bangera, G.; Brownell, S. E. Course-Based Undergraduate Research
Experiences Can Make Scientific Research More Inclusive. CBE Life Sci.
Educ. 2014, 13 (4), 602–606.
41. Farrell, J. J.; Moog, R. S.; Spencer, J. N. A Guided-Inquiry General
Chemistry Course. J. Chem. Educ. 1999, 76 (4), 570.
18
42. Prince, M. Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research. J. Engr.
Educ. 2004, 93 (3), 223–231.
43. Haak, D. C.; Hillerislambers, J.; Pitre, E.; Freeman, S. Increased Structure
and Active Learning Reduce the Achievement Gap in Introductory Biology.
Sci. Mag. 2011, 332 (6034), 1213–1216.
44. Falk, J. H.; Dierking, L. D. The 95 Percent Solution. Am. Sci. 2010, 98,
486–493.
45. Jeschofing, L.; Jeschofing, P. Teaching Lab Science Courses online:
Resources for Best Practices, Tools, And Technology; Josey-Bass Publishing:
San Francisco, CA, 2011.
46. Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Alaska Public Road Length.
https://www.rita.dot.gov/bts/sites/rita.dot.gov.bts/files/publications/
state_transportation_statistics/alaska/html/table_01_01.html (accessed
December 11, 2017).
47. University of Alaska Fairbanks. 2015-16 Univeristy of Alaska Fairbanks
Course Catalog. http://www.uaf.edu/catalog/catalog_15-16/baccalaureate/
bac2.html - Core_Curriculum (December 6, 2017).
48. Hayes, S. M.; Guerard, J. J. Introduction to Environmental Chemistry
of the Arctic Syllabus. http://www.uaf.edu/files/chem/2015-8-7-
SyllabusCHEM194-1.pdf (accessed December 7, 2017).
49. Dixson, M. D. Creating effective student engagement in online courses: What
do students find engaging? J. Scholar. Teach. Learn. 2010, 10 (2), 1–13.
50. Pigliapoco, E.; Bogliolo, A. The Effects of Psychological Sense of
Community in Online and Face-to-Face Academic Courses. Int. J. Emerging
Technol. Learn. (iJET) 2008, 3 (4)2008.
51. Yuan, J.; Kim, C. Guidelines for facilitating the development of learning
communities in online courses. J. Comp. Assist. Learn. 2014, 30 (3),
220–232.
52. National Center for Case Study Teaching in Science. http://
sciencecases.lib.buffalo.edu/cs/ (accessed December 11, 2017).
53. eScience Labs. http://www.esciencelabs.com (accessed December 7, 2017).
54. Radenbaugh, T. Surface Water Quality Occupational Endorsement:
Monitoring Rural Alaskan Streams. ACS Northwest Regional Meeting,
Anchorage, AK, 2015.
55. Hayes, S. M.; Guerard, J. J. Sampling Natural Waters. https://
www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLeqsADqTFzmvFhlojSgNF43JFP9F
VhR1R (accessed December 6, 2017).
19
Chapter 2
are excluded from the sample (1). b Demographic information for the EJ-CIP Project was
collected using self-reported data from a student survey of the project. N/S corresponds to
data that was “not surveyed” in this questionnaire.
22
• Motivate and engage students in applied research and experiential
learning through a community-based, interdisciplinary project;
• Integrate students with an external advisor, as well as other members, in
their regional community;
• Improve student knowledge of environmental justice history, policies,
and research; and
• Improve interdisciplinary communication and understanding at an
undergraduate level.
25
Environmental Justice and Air Pollution
27
The environmental justice work of public policy experts would not be possible
without the data provided by physical scientists such as chemists, biologists, and
epidemiologists. The work of physical scientists is essential for collecting the data
analyzed by policy experts to answer the questions they pose and to implement
evidence-based policies (29). Specifically, chemists are able to analyze complex
mixtures to quantify HAPs in communities, giving an estimation of exposure rates
to different toxic compounds. Biologists can use mouse-model studies or cellular
assays to assess the toxicity of different compounds or the possible synergistic
effects of mixtures. This work combines with that of epidemiologists using cross-
sectional or longitudinal studies to assess human health effects of exposure.
One of the challenges faced by the teaching and learning of both political
science and chemistry (the two disciplines most heavily combined in this project)
is to maintain relevance in the eyes of students. During the EJ-CIP project, the
thematic integration of the two fields to investigate social justice issues in the form
of exposure to toxic air pollutants was used to demonstrate the relevant nature
of both fields in the lives of students and their communities. One goal of such
project-based research within the community is to give students the opportunity
to link expertise gained from coursework with application to a real-life challenge
and the ability to drive or direct positive change. For example, students who study
public policy (SLA students) may encounter challenges interpreting the source or
meaning of chemical exposure data. SST students, on the other hand, may not
see the relevance of their work or how it can possibly impact policy decisions.
This deficiency in interdisciplinary understanding from both fields can result in
the impediment of sound future policy analyses and implementation.
In sum, from an environmental justice perspective, there is an intimate
link between science and public policy. This relationship also exists between
policy and other scientific endeavors, since funding for a variety of scientific
investigations is often influenced by public policy and it is imperative that
public policy is evidenced-based and data-driven. Since this mutualism between
policy-makers and scientists makes it necessary that communication between the
two fields flows efficiently (29–32), it is important to introduce undergraduate
students to the role of science in public policy and vice versa. Thus, the EJ-CIP
project integrated students on an interdisciplinary level, early in their career
development, aiming to strengthen communication across the policy and physical
science disciplines.
Previous approaches to this challenge have included curriculum development
for upper level chemistry courses that include problem- and project-based
learning with an environmental focus (31, 33–37). However, teaching chemistry
with public policy implications and themes only confronts one-half of the
communication challenge. Interdisciplinary communication must be encouraged
in both directions. Not only must physical science students understand policy
implications, but political science students must also be proficient in the scientific
method and data interpretation. As a result of the above challenges, effort in
the EJ-CIP study was directed to require students to work outside of their field
of expertise. SLA students worked alongside SST students in the field and
laboratory, while SST students worked with SLA students on demographic and
policy analysis (Figure 2). This encouraged students to ask questions of one
28
another, communicate openly, and discover important relationships between the
social and physical sciences, resulting in facilitated dialogue between future
policy makers and scientists from an early stage in their careers.
Figure 2. A Venn diagram which shows the interdisciplinary nature of the project,
in which students from both fields of expertise were required to conduct methods
and work in the field of their collaborators.
Experimental Methods
Interdisciplinary Nature of the Research Team
This project integrated students into a field of study that was beyond their
current realm of expertise, aiming to improve dialogue and understanding between
science and policy. Students worked collaboratively within this team to reach
a goal (obtaining and disseminating results), which encouraged the growth of
beneficial hard and soft skills, including, but not limited to, conducting research
in an experiential and quantitative fashion, communicating technical information
both orally and in writing, and working in real world, modern conditions in their
respective fields. Via their external advisor, GreenLaw, students interacted with
professionals outside of the college, to see the operation of environmental law
and advocacy groups first-hand, as well as to make contacts with professionals
having similar interests and goals. Although it is possible for the SST and
SLA aspects of this program to stand alone, the interdisciplinary nature of the
program allowed students and faculty to gain experience with environmental
chemistry analyses while simultaneously engaging in an upper level policy
analysis. Collaboration with outside groups also added an additional component
of community engagement that encouraged the development of professional soft
skills outside of the typical college setting.
Importantly, students with different academic backgrounds worked together
to solve a complex problem relating to their community. The team consisted of
seven students from three different disciplinary backgrounds. Two students were
29
majoring in biochemistry, one in environmental science, and four were political
science majors concentrating in legal studies. The political science majors had
very limited knowledge regarding the science needed to inform policymakers nor
were they experienced with lab work. The biochemistry students, however, were
unaware of the policy implications related to the work they often performed in
the lab. For the environmental studies student, the interdisciplinary nature of the
project helped to consolidate the knowledge learned inside the classroom with
actual fieldwork and lab experience.
EJSCREEN
Seven sites were chosen for analysis, with each student choosing a site to
research. This format gave students “ownership” over the data collection and
analysis specific to their site. Students used the EJSCREEN tool, a publically
available database provided through the U.S. EPA (38). EJSCREEN “allows
users to access high-resolution environmental and demographic information for
locations in the United States, and compare their selected locations to the rest of
the state, EPA region, or the nation (38).” It should be noted that screening-level
tools, such as EJSCREEN, are limited in scope and data, and therefore, do
not determine the existence or absence of environmental justice concerns in
a specific geographic location (38). Thus, this project used EJSCREEN to
select possible sites of inquiry and then followed with subsequent chemical
measurements and demographic analyses. Students investigated the demographic
distributions of several possible sites, but also investigated the predicted air
pollution environmental indicators provided by EJSCREEN such as, particulate
matter less than 2.5 microns in aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5), the national air
toxics assessment (NATA) diesel PM, and NATA air toxics cancer risk. These are
described as follows:
Sampling sites in the Atlanta metropolitan region were chosen based on these
environmental indicators, as well as, several demographic parameters listed below
(38):
Data for these demographic parameters for each site are listed below in
Table 2.
Table 2. Demographic data obtained for each site from EJSCREEN (38)
Site ID % Low income % Minority %Linguistically
Isolated
A 15 19 0
B 24 90 0
C 49 63 6
D 54 87 11
E 77 66 9
F 27 38 12
G 36 16 0
For this pilot study, students’ initial focus included atmospheric PAHs. The
study aimed to quantify gas-phase concentrations of the 16 PAHs listed on the U.S.
EPA Priority Pollutant List (39). PAH sources include incomplete combustion
processes such as vehicle (diesel) emissions, residential activity and industrial
heating (40). PAHs have shown mutagenic properties in bacterial and mammalian
assays, and are classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer
(IARC) as probable human carcinogens (41–43). Combined with their tendency
to bioaccumulate, PAHs pose risks to both environmental organisms and humans
(44). Table 3 lists the analyte PAHs measured in this study, their associated
abbreviations, molecular structures and internal standards of quantitation.
31
Table 3. List of analyte PAHs (including abbreviations and molecular
structures) measured in this study
32
Passive air samplers (PAS) were used in this study to measure the
concentration of PAHs at each site. These samplers, characterized and used
in many previous studies of ambient concentrations of gas-phase persistent
organic pollutants, are low cost and require no power during sampling, and
have not yet been deployed in the Atlanta metropolitan region. The PAS (Tisch
Environmental; Cleves, OH) have been thoroughly characterized and their
method of operations previously described (45, 46). In brief, the PAS includes a
polyurethane foam disk (PUF, ½” height x 5 ½” diameter; part number TE-0114)
held inside of a stainless steel dome used for protection against precipitation,
deposition of particulate matter, UV light, and the influence of wind speed (47).
They operate based on the air-side mass transfer coefficient and the PUF-air
partitioning coefficient of each analyte (45), and thus, require no outside power
source for a pump, are quiet and non-invasive, and are a relatively inexpensive
way to increase spatial resolution of gas-phase PAH concentrations. PAS are
ideal for this type of study, in which spatial resolution of samples is important,
compared to traditional samples methods (such as high volume air samplers),
because PAS allows for simultaneous measurements at several different sites at a
time, generally prohibited with tradition sampling methods due to high cost and
person-hours needed to change sampling media. Similar PAS systems have been
used in several large-scale studies to measure atmospheric PAH concentrations
(46–52).
Figure 3. PAS deployed at Site C using non-invasive measures (zip ties and
hose clamps).
33
Table 4. Deployment characteristics for each site
Date Total #
Site Latitude Longitude Site Type Deployed Sample Days
A 34.075402° -83.87047° School 1/17/2017 37.0
B 33.571235° -84.61902° School 1/10/2017 51.9
C 33.828622° -84.11447° Residential 2/4/2017 31.0
D 33.963097° -84.06922° GA EPD 1/11/2017 54.0
E 34.299359° -83.8134° GA EPD 1/13/2017 41.9
F1, F2 34.257762° -83.84541° Forested 1/13/2017 42.0
G 33.729485° -84.37091° Residential 2/4/2017 40.8
Method blank extracts were collected by subjecting clean PUFs to the same
laboratory and analytical procedures as sample PUFs. Two field blanks were
collected by packaging clean PUFs in aluminum foil, plastic bags and mason jars,
transporting them to the sampling site in the same manner as the sample PUFs,
placing the field blank PUFs in the stainless domes for approximately one minute,
and then storing under similar conditions as sample PUFs until extraction and
analysis. It should be noted that the only site where replicates were measured
was Site F (samples F1/F2). All PUFs were stored in aluminum foil, plastic bags,
and mason jars at 30°C until extractions were performed.
PUFs were spiked with a mix of deuterated internal standards (NAP-d8,
ANT-d10, FLA-d10, and BaA-d12, Supelco, TraceCERT) for quantitative purposes
and Soxhlet extracted in 50/50 hexane/acetone (Fisher Scientific, Optima) mix
for 24 hours. Samples were then concentrated under rotary evaporation and
eluted through silica solid phase extraction (SPE) columns (Discovery DSC-Si,
Sigma Aldrich) using a 50/50 mixture of hexane and dichloromethane (DCM,
Fisher Scientific, Optima) mix. Extracts were brought to a final volume of ~
200 µL using nitrogen flow (53). All PUF extracts were analyzed with gas
chromatography- mass spectrometry (GC-MS) using a Shimadzu QP2010S,
operated with EI ionization and SIM mode. Samples were injected at 280° C in
splitless mode, and separations were completed on a 30 m x 250 µm i.d. (film
thickness 0.25 µm) SHRXI-5 MS column (Shimadzu). The initial temperature
of the column was held at 70°C for three minutes, and then increased at 20°
min-1 to 315°C and held for 30 minutes. Retention times confirmed with a PAH
mix standard solution (EPA 610 PAH mix, Supelco) and concentrations were
calculated relative to the added deuterated internal standards.
Student Deliverables
Blog
Student reflection helps facilitate learning and keeps students fully engaged
(54). It is therefore important to find ways that help students reflect on the material
they learn. Blogs are a great tool for classroom use since they require students to
34
reflect on their work in a digital environment familiar to today’s student. Blogging
also allows students to create an online portfolio that highlights their work that
they can share with family, friends, potential graduate schools, and employers. As
a result, this project required students keep a weekly blog updating the progress of
the project and the specific work they performed.
Students began their blog by summarizing the goals of the project and
discussing the importance of investigating issues related to environmental justice.
After the initial post, students shared their experience selecting site locations,
the new skills they learned in the laboratory, the knowledge they gained related
to environmental policy, their experience visiting site locations and placing the
air samplers, as well as meeting with members of the community. In addition
to reflections on their work, students also posted photographs and supplemental
information to enhance the substance of their reflections. The result was a
professional online portfolio useable to display skills and accomplishments when
applying for graduate school or employment.
Students also reflected on the experiences they had at their meeting with the
external advisor, GreenLaw. Students not only discussed the substance of the
meeting, but also reflected on how the classroom and laboratory work transferred
to real world professional endeavors to solve issues of environmental justice. The
connection with what they learned and how it applied to future career possibilities
is particularly useful since it helps students see beyond the classroom experience
to how these skills can transfer to their future career goals.
Site Reports
Students’ site reports made it easy to record and organize data for later
analysis to determine what, if any, factors may contribute to the amount of
pollution in an area where samplers were placed. The reports included basic
geographic information, demographic statistics, and identification of polluting
businesses and industry located in the area of sample placement. For this project,
each student was assigned a particular location for which they generated the
site report. The reports were divided into several sections. The first section
covered basic location and geographic information about the sampler location.
Demographic information, such as population levels, percentage of individuals in
different minority groups, income levels, and education levels were included. In
addition to basic demographic information, the report included a section to record
health statistics of individuals living in the area. The third section of the report
included information about area pollution. The percentile of PM2.5, NATA Diesel
PM, and NATA RHI were estimated using the EJSCREEN information (38).
Information about current and past industries that may contribute to pollution
surrounding the sampler placement was also included. Details about these
industries included the name and address of the business, the type of industry,
and a summary of possible pollutants created by that particular industry. The
final section of the report included the actual data collected from the air samplers
placed in the field by the students.
To gather information for the report, students conducted on-site visits to
survey the geography of the area and determined present conditions where
35
samplers were placed. USGS and Google Maps were also used to learn more
about the topography of the sampler location. An examination of municipal and
county planning files as well as searches with local public agencies were checked
for prior and current land usage and permits in the area. This information helped
students locate current and past polluting industries. The Health Department
provided statistics about the health of individuals within a county, though this
information proved to be more difficult to find for most students, and was not
spatially resolved to the level of our chemical measurements. Demographic
information was primarily collected using statistics provided by the EJSCREEN,
but also compared to census data when available.
In some cases, students gained information on history of a location through
informal interactions with community members. For example, through interaction
with community members in Gainesville, GA, students learned of the Newtown
story and the Newtown Florist Club (55). The predominantly African American
residents living in the Newtown neighborhood exist alongside 14 polluting
industries within a 1-mile radius of their community. Members of this community
have suffered from high incidences of lupus, and specific types of mouth, throat,
and lung cancers. The Newton Florist Club is a grassroots organization that has
organized to bring awareness to their fight for environmental justice. This is
a community who has historically struggled with issues of environmental (in)
justice and brings light to the complex nature of proving and solving these types
of issues. These sources provided information for the environmental justice
struggles of a community less than 30 miles from GGC, giving the students a local
context with respect to the need of sound measurements and policies regarding
environmental justice.
When site reports were completed, students met to discuss their findings and
analyze the results. They also shared their reports on their individual blogs. Not
only were the reports useful for helping students organize the data they needed to
collect for analyzing the sampler results and drawing conclusions about the sources
of pollution and its impacts, but they also provided a deliverable that students can
share with potential employers and graduate schools.
37
professional setting and were able to network with business professionals as well
as community and global leaders.
38
Preliminary results from the analysis of six sites in the Atlanta metropolitan
region regarding total PAH concentrations using PAS techniques are shown
in Figure 5. While statistical analysis of variance could not be performed on
single samples (replicates were only measured at one site), upon initial analysis,
concentrations of PAHs at site A were two times greater than the average
concentration of all other sites. This sampler was hung on a fence bordering the
parking lot of an elementary school, where it was thought that buses idled prior to
loading students for transport at the end of each school day. Although a height of
166 cm was used to approximate exposure for an average adult, it may not havee
allowed for complete mixing of an air parcel prior to sampling. As a result, the
data for this site was considered as an outlier and was not used in the combined
chemical concentration and demographic analysis (shown in Figure 7).
Figure 5. Total PAH concentrations (pg m-3) for six sites in the Atlanta
metropolitan region. Samples F1 and F2 represent replicate samplers hung at
site F. These were the only replicate samples taken during this pilot project.
39
Figure 6. Distribution of PAHs for Site A (top left), Site F (top right), Site B
(bottom left) and Site C (bottom right). PAHs that appear in over five percent are
represented structurally, according to pie chart color.
41
Table 5. Results of student survey after EJ-CIP participation
Parameter assessed % Participant Response
Perception that scientific inquiry can be applied in 71.4% Large change
everyday life 28.6% Moderate change
Understanding of how scientists work on real 57.2% Large change
issues/problems 28.5% Moderate change
14.3% Small change
Perception that research questions can be 85.7% Large change
successfully applied to address community issues 14.3% Moderate change
Confidence in your laboratory techniques 71.4% Large change
14.3% Moderate change
14.3% Small change
Confidence in communicating with researchers 85.7% Large change
outside of your major 14.3% Moderate change
Confidence in working on a project in which some 71.4% Large change
areas are outside of your expertise 28.6% Moderate change
Ability to work as part of a collaborative group 85.7% Large change
14.3% Moderate change
Understanding of the history of environmental 85.7% Large change
justice and current policies in place 14.3% Moderate change
The parameters that saw the greatest percent of students reporting a “large
positive change” included:
Thus, the survey suggests that goals were met with respect to increasing the
knowledge of undergraduates that academic research can be applied to community
issues, the confidence and ability of students to communicate and work outside of
their areas of expertise, and increasing awareness of environmental justice history
and issues in the state of Georgia. Students generally reported an increase change
for all parameters given, with the exception of “understanding that scientific
assertions require supporting evidence.” Several students, when asked to express
additional comments on the project offered:
42
• “The CIP made me realize the depth of work that can be done within the
legal profession to help society at large. As a result, I am better able to
focus more specifically on the type of legal career I wish to pursue”;
• “Working with other students with different majors, striving for the same
goal was inspiring as well as educational;” and
• “So grateful to have been able to work with a team from varying degree
programs.”
Future Goals
Several students have suggested that this research project be offered as
an official course, instead of just a faculty advised research project. The
interdisciplinary nature of the project lends itself to the newly developed
Environmental Science major here at GGC, which includes both a social science,
and a natural science track. Political science students have also expressed an
interest in participating in an official course such as this. They argue the active
learning approach as well as the integration with other fields like chemistry help
provide real world experiences that better connect the theories they study with
their application. In continuing this project, it is expected to increase the sample
number, number of replicates, and extend analyte analysis to include specific
polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) congeners. This theme will be used as a full
semester long course integrated research project for the Environmental Science
Capstone Course (ESNS 4900) offered at GGC in Spring 2018.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank our seven student researchers for their participation
and energy put forth into this project. We would also like to thank Mr. Lee
Irminger (Elachee Nature Science Center), Mr. Ken Buckley (GA Environmental
Protection Division), Evoline C. West Elementary, and Duncan Creek Elementary
School for their cooperation with hanging sampling devices. Special thanks to
our external advisor, GreenLaw, for hosting our students and providing valuable
feedback on their project plan. Faculty and support who were influential in
discussing and promoting this project include Dr. Charles Pibel, Dr. Brian
Etheridge, Dr. Aldolfo Santos, and Dr. Thomas Mundie. We thank the Georgia
Gwinnett College Community Innovations Project program and the School of
Science and Technology for funding. The results and contents of this publication
do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of the external advisors or
collaborating partners.
43
References
44
16. Samet, J. M.; White, R. H. Urban Air Pollution, Health, And Equity. J.
Epidemiol. Community Health 2004, 58, 3–5.
17. The American Lung Association. Urban Air Pollution and Health Inequities:
A Workshop Report. Environ. Health Perspect. 2001, 109, 357–374.
18. Schweitzer, L.; Valenzuela, A. Environmental Injustice and Transportation:
The Claims and the Evidence. J. Plan Lit. 2004, 18, 383–398.
19. Miranda, M. L.; Edwards, S. E.; Keating, M. H.; Paul, C. J. Making
the Environmental Justice Grade: The Relative Burden of Air Pollution
Exposure in the United States. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2011, 81,
1755–1771.
20. Bell, M. L.; Ebisu, K. Environmental Inequality in Exposures to Airborne
Particulate Matter Components in the United States. Environ. Health
Perspect. 2012, 120, 1699–1704.
21. Apelberg, B. J.; Buckley, T. J.; White, R. H. Socioeconomic and Racial
Disparities in Cancer Risk from Air Toxics in Maryland. Environ. Health
Perspect. 2005, 113, 693–699.
22. Caldwell, J. C.; Woodruff, T. J.; Morello-Frosch, R.; Axelrad, D. A.
Application of Health Information to Hazardous Air Pollutants Models
in EPA’s Cumulative Exposure Project. Toxicol. Ind. Health 1998, 14,
429–454.
23. Morello-Frosch, R. A.; Woodruff, T. J.; Axelrad, D. A.; Caldwell, J. C. Air
Toxics and Health Risks in California: The Public Health Implications of
Outdoor Concentrations. Risk Anal. 2000, 20, 273–291.
24. Green, R. S.; Smorodinsky, S.; Kim, J. J.; McLaughlin, R.; Ostro, B.
Proximity of California Public Schools to Busy Roads. Environ. Health
Perspect. 2004, 112, 61–66.
25. Gunier, R. B.; Hertz, A.; Von Behren, J.; Reynolds, P. Traffic Density
in California: Socioeconomic and Ethnic Differences Among Potentially
Exposed Children. J. Expo. Anal. Environ. Epidemiol. 2003, 13, 240–246.
26. Bonorris, S. (Ed). Environmental Justice for All: A Fifty State Survey
of Legislation, Policies and Cases. American Bar Association and
Hastings College of the Law: San Francisco, CA, February, 2010.
http://gov.uchastings.edu/public-law/docs/ejreport-fourthedition.pdf
(accessedNovember 5, 2017).
27. Burton, L. H. Interdisciplinary Communication: Retrospect and Prospect.
Music Educ. J. 2001, 87 (5), 17–66.
28. Woods, C. Researching and Developing Interdisciplinary Teaching: Towards
a Conceptual Framework for Classroom Communication. High. Educ. 2007,
54, 856–866.
29. Juntti, M.; Russel, D.; Turnpenny, J. Evidence, Politics, and Power in Public
Policy. Environ. Sci. Policy 2009, 12, 207–215.
30. Quevauviller, P.; Balabanis, P.; Fragakis, C.; Weydert, M.; Oliver, M.;
Kaschl, A.; Arnold, G.; Kroll, A.; Galbiati, L.; Zaldivar, J. M.; Giovanni, B.
Science-Policy Integration Needs in Support of the Implementation of the
EU Water Framework Directive. Envon. Sci. Policy 2005, 8, 203–211.
45
31. Hosten, C. M.; Talanova, G.; Lipkowitz, K. B. Introducing Undergraduates
to the Role of Science in Public Policy and in the Service of the Community.
Chem. Ed. Res. Pract. 2011, 12, 388–394.
32. Pence, L. E. Chemists and Policy-- Bridging the Gap. Chem. Eng. News
2014, 92, 34.
33. Lasker, G. A.; Mellor, K. E.; Mullins, M. L.; Nesmith, S. M.; Simcox, N.
J. Social and Environmental Justice in the Chemistry Classroom. J. Chem.
Educ. 2017, 94, 983–987.
34. Draper, A. Integrating Project-Based Service-Learning into an Advanced
Environmental Chemistry Course. J. Chem. Educ. 2004, 81, 221–224.
35. Gardella, J. A.; Milillo, T. M.; Sinha, G.; Oh, G.; Manns, D. C.; Coffey, E.
Linking Community Service, Learning, and Environmental Analytical
Chemistry. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 810–818.
36. Breslin, V. T.; Sanude-Wilhemy, S. J. The Lead Project: An Environmental
Instrumental Analysis Case Study. J. Chem. Educ. 2001, 78, 1647–1651.
37. Cancilla, D. A. Integration of Environmental Analytical Chemistry with
Environmental Law: The Development of a Problem-Based Laboratory. J.
Chem. Educ. 2001, 78, 1652–1660.
38. EJSCREEN Technical Documentation. U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency: Washington, DC, 2015. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/
2015-05/documents/ejscreen_technical_document_20150505.pdf#page=13
(accessed November 5, 2017).
39. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.EPA Priority Pollutant List.
https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/priority-
pollutant-list-epa.pdf (accessed November 5, 2017).
40. Baek, S. O.; Field, R. A.; Goldstone, M. E.; Kirk, P. W.; Lester, J. N.;
Perry, R. A Review of Atmospheric Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons:
Sources, Fate, and Behavior. Water Air Soil Pollut. 1991, 60, 279–300.
41. Monographs in the Series Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans:
Vol. 46, Diesel and Gasoline Engine Exhausts and Some Nitroarenes;
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), World Health
Organization: Lyon, 1989.
42. Durant, J. L.; Busby, W. F., Jr.; Lafleur, A. L.; Penman, B. W.; Crespi, C.
L. Human Cell Mutagenicity of Oxygenated, Nitrated and Unsubstituted
Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons Associated with Urban Aerosols. Mutat.
Res. 1996, 371, 123–157.
43. Straif, K.; Baan, R.; Grosse, Y.; Secretan, B.; El Ghissassi, F.; Cogliano, V.
Carcinogenicity of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. Lancet Oncol. 2005,
6, 931–932.
44. Menzie, C. A.; Potocki, B. B.; Santodonato, J. Exposure to Carcinogenic
PAHs in the Environment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1992, 26, 1278–1284.
45. Harner, T.; Shoeib, M.; Diamond, M.; Stern, G.; Rosenberg, B. Using Passive
Air Samplers to Assess Urban-Rural Trends for Persistent Organic Pollutants.
1. Polychlorinated Biphenyls and Organochlorine Pesticides. Environ. Sci.
Technol. 2004, 38, 4474–4483.
46. Harner, T.; Su, K.; Guenaldi, S.; Karpowicz, J.; Ahrens, L.; Mihele, C.;
Schuster, J.; Charland, J. P.; Narayan, J. Calibration and Application of PUF
46
Disk Passive Air Samplers for Tracking Polycyclic Aromatic Compounds
(PACs). Atmos. Environ. 2013, 75, 123–128.
47. Motelay-Massei, A.; Harner, T.; Shoeib, M.; Diamond, M.; Stern, G.;
Rosenberg, G. Using Passive Air Samplers to Assess Urban-Rural Trends
for Persistent Organic Pollutants and Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons. 2.
Seasonal Trends in PAHs, PCBs, and Organochlorine Pesticides. Environ.
Sci. Technol. 2005, 39, 5763–5773.
48. Jaward, F.; Farrar, N.; Harner, T.; Sweetman, A.; Jones, K. C. Passive
air Sampling of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Polychlorinated
Naphthalenes across Europe. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2004, 23,
1355–1364.
49. Bartkow, M. E.; Kennedy, K. E.; Huckins, J. N.; Holling, N.; Komarova, T.;
Muller, J. F. Photodegradation of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in
Passive Air Samplers: Field Testing Different Deployment Chambers.
Environ. Pollut. 2006, 144, 371–176.
50. He, J.; Balasubramanian, R. A Comparative Evaluation of Passive and Active
Samplers for Measures of Gaseous Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds in the
Tropical Atmosphere. Atmos. Environ. 2010, 44, 884–891.
51. Pozo, K.; Harner, T.; Wania, F.; Muir, D. C. G.; Jones, K. C.; Barrie, L. A.
Toward a Global Network for Persistent Organic Pollutants in Air: Results
from the GAPs Study. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 4867–4873.
52. Peverly, A. A.; Ma, Y.; Venier, M.; Rodenburg, Z.; Spak, S. N.;
Hornbuckle, K. C.; Hites, R. H. Variations of Flame Retardant, Polycyclic
Aromatic Hydrocarbons, and Pesticide Concentrations in Chicago’s
Atmosphere Measured Using Passive Sampling. Environ. Sci. Technol.
2015, 49, 5371–5379.
53. Buehler, S. S.; Basu, I.; Hites, R. A. A comparison of PAH, PCB, and
Pesticide Concentrations in Air at Two Rural Sites on Lake Superior.
Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 2417–2422.
54. Costa, A. L.; Kallick, B. Chapter 12: Learning through Reflection.
In Learning and Leading through Habits and Mind: 16 Essential
Characteristics for Success. Costa, A. L., Kallick, B., Eds.; Association for
Supervision & Curriculum Development: Virginia, 2008.
55. Kohl, E. A.; Permanence of the Struggle: Race, Gender, and Environmental
Justice in Gainesville, Georgia; Thesis, University of Georgia, January 2015.
56. Klanova, J.; Eupr, P.; Kohoutek, J.; Harner, T. Assessing the Influence of
Meteorological Parameters on the Performance of Polyurethane Foam-Based
Passive Air Samplers. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008, 42, 550–555.
57. Lopatto, D. Survey of Undergraduate Research Experiences (SURE): First
Findings. Cell Biol. Educ. 2004, 3, 270–277.
47
Chapter 3
The purpose of the research is to build and establish a network of data loggers
across Western Pennsylvania to monitor water quality and observe salinization
trends. Data loggers are simple sensors that collect and store information over
time for a particular location. The problem with current water quality research
is the lack of data across a focus area. If a large network can be easily and
inexpensively built along streams and rivers in a focus area (in this case Western
Pennsylvania), more insight can be found on the causes of poor water quality in
drinking water sources. To do so, salinization measurements will give insight on
overall water quality. Salinization can be found with a measure of conductivity,
directly related to the concentration of total dissolved solids in the water (1).
The problem with recent brand name data loggers is that they are too intricate
and expensive for simple research purposes. What is needed to advance the
current state of knowledge is a simple yet robust sensor that is cheap to build and
easy to operate. Results from deploying this sensor will give an understanding
on the behaviors of the dissolved solids present in surface water such as salt.
Over time, the inexpensive data loggers have the potential to lead to a network
of sensors blanketing Western Pennsylvania, therefore increasing awareness of
water contamination issues. As the project is in its early stages, mapping the area
where these sensors will be deployed has not yet occurred.
Water quality data coupled with the emerging field of data science has the
potential to expedite scientific research and inform decisions about resource
allocation. One of the areas with the most potential for growth and innovation is
that of the water sensing. Current water sensors are large, cumbersome to use and
require specialized maintenance in order to gain reliable data sources. This limits
the number of sensors citizen groups can deploy as well as the duration that they
can be maintained. Smart systems, such as the internet of things (IOT) sensor
network in this work can help track contaminants at the backyard level and act
as first line avenues for data collection. The niche that citizen groups fill within
the water quality data nexus is currently small due to the limited availability and
accessibility of water quality sensors. Increasing data yields in a measurable way
through inclusion of IOT sensors and optimization can build out the footprint of
those community groups in a sustainable way. This in turn will build capacity
within the network and provide a jumping off point for community revitalization
efforts. Sensors for the IOT are growing in prevalence and availability. A Wall
Street Journal article last year estimated that the IOT market could reach $1.7
trillion by 2020 (2). IOT technology has moved beyond indoor space and into
the outdoors recently with a number of products and services such as the Edyn
watering sensor. The Edyn garden sensor has 5 sensors. It measures temperature,
humidity, light levels, soil moisture and soil nutrition (3). The Edyn probe
functions by sending an electrical pulse into the soil and detecting how that pulse
is affected by fertilizer and water using a technique that is identical to that used in
commercial farming. It also includes extensive digital dictionaries indexing the
compatibility, preferred conditions, and seasonal watering needs for thousands of
plants. The current version of the Edyn is produced commercially and costs $99
50
per sensor, which is still a substantial amount of money, particularly for a large
network of sensors.
There are currently open hardware low-cost data loggers for turbidity, but not
other water-quality parameters such as salinity. An NSF-sponsored critical zone
observatory (CZO) also includes multiple data loggers built with open-sourced
hardware (Arduino) and monitoring equipment, but to our knowledge no
conductivity measurements are recorded regularly and no sensor design was
included in the design.
The MC REU project is in its third year of existence. The REU program
connects faculty and students early in their careers to help build a foundation
of undergraduate research. Students spend most their time at their home
commonwealth campus, with two weeks out of the ten-week experience in
workshops with the entire cohort at University Park. Having two faculty mentors
(one from each campus) allows students to make bridging connections and extend
their research networks early in their undergraduate careers.
It has been shown that students that participate in undergraduate research
show increased interest in graduate study (4). A survey of researchers participating
in NSF REUs showed a 29% increase in interest of students in pursuing a PhD
after graduation following their undergraduate research experience (4). An
emphasis of the MC REU program is for students to participate in the culture of
research by experiencing faculty mentorship, presenting at the end of experience
conference and writing about their research work. In this way, students broaden
their education and increase their awareness of pathways to graduate education.
Another emphasis of the MC REU program is to connect faculty from
Commonwealth campuses to other faculty within Penn State. Faculty mentors
collaborating on shared research goals with shared student workers promote
awareness of Penn State resources and avenues for collaboration. A goal of the
program is to spawn new research collaborations as well as to promote the use
of shared resources for research.
Methods
This project is based on the Arduino platform and uses Arduino Unos as its
basis due to their wide availability and ease of use at an entry level. Arduino is
an open source platform for building electronics. The Arduino system consists
of a microcontroller or small circuit board, and software that is used to write and
upload code to the microcontroller. Arduino code is based on C++, and is simple
to learn and use, making it an ideal choice for an undergraduate research project.
Two student teams worked over the course of two summer term periods to refine
and test a basic sensor design. For the purpose of this exercise, each design was
focused on sensing conductivity as the main goal.
The first iteration of the sensor is a simple Arduino Uno that has three power
sources, built in temperature sensor diodes, and a customizable protoboard. This
sensor, called the Riffle, was originally produced by PublicLab as part of the
Open Water Project. The Riffle can also be attached to a protoboard to increase
51
its sensing capability. Both the Riffle and associated protoboard are shown in
Figure 1.
The Riffle can be powered with a lithium-ion battery, a button-cell battery, or
a USB/microUSB port. The temperature is automatically logged on a microSD
card for the Riffle. In order for the Riffle to measure conductivity, a circuit design
capable of doing so was soldered onto the protoboard attachment. In order to
make the Riffle compatible with a conductivity probe, the protoboard was adapted
to include a sensor array called the Coqui. The Coquí (Figure 2) is designed with
a probe that acts as a variable resistor.
Figure 1. Riffle Arduino board (top) and associated proto board (bottom).
Does the new conductivity probe give good data compared to a traditional
probe?
Questions were posed in oral form, following project discussion with faculty
mentors in the eighth week of the REU experience. Students responded to these
questions both orally and in the written form of a report. It was found that the
Arduino based probe did not perform as well as the traditional probes within a
reasonable margin of error (10-15%), likely due to interferences on the nichrome
wire probe which lead to variation in the cell constant. As the comparison test
was only performed one time, data is not included here. Students in future
undergraduate research experiences will perform the comparison test multiple
times to generate a larger data set for analysis, including statistics. Anecdotally,
collecting and analyzing data helped to stimulate and sustain student interest in
research, as students involved in the project were able to see their efforts manifest.
Students made several suggestions regarding the design of the probe, the
most common response being to make the probe more robust. This response
was a valuable insight as the project continues to develop. For future work,
undergraduate researchers will fabricate a housing to better protect the probe
and reduce interferences. Regarding potential community uses for the probe,
53
monitoring water quality downstream of industrial discharges and within local
water bodies for fishermen were two popular responses.
Students involved in the MC REU program were asked to produce weekly
reports about their research experience, blog about topics related to undergraduate
research and present a final poster at the closing research forum.
Discussion
Close collaboration with faculty is one of the main goals of the program,
which is fostered by the structure of the REU. As part of student engagement
within the MC REU program, each student spends 8 weeks at their home campus
and 2 weeks at the University Park Penn State campus. During this time, students
visit laboratories on campus, attend sessions about career development and
teambuilding, and meet with additional faculty and graduate students. Although
working independently on a research project, students receive faculty support and
instruction for several hours each week to help achieve their goals. This close
collaboration is cited by students as the most valued asset of the program.
Both sessions that have engaged with this program cite the close collaboration
with faculty as well as the hands-on nature of the research activity as stimulating
their interest in research. More specifically, the students were surveyed if they
would continue doing undergraduate research. All responses were either agree or
strongly agree. One commented that participating in the project “…helped me to
see research as an avenue for a possible career that I had not considered before.”
It was also noted in the comments portion of the poll that presenting their research
in the closing forum helped them to better understand not only the material but
to stimulate the interest of others in the audience in the growing field of remote
sensing.
Conclusions
This research experience has resulted in an engaged student experience that
provides in-depth topic exploration and familiarity with complex material as
well as providing greater engagement between faculty and students. Students
benefited from the interaction with real world research problems as well as their
own discoveries to provide enhanced understanding of the research process.
Students responded overwhelmingly positively to this activity, and it is planned to
continue to offer this research experience for students. For future work, students
will map the area of Western Pennsylvania for sensor placement, and collect and
interpret relevant water quality data using the sensors.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to acknowledge the support of the Penn State Greater
Allegheny community during preparation of this submission.
54
References
55
Chapter 4
Introduction
How do we know if an environmental policy to reduce pollution is effective?
Answers can be obtained from environmental data collected by a network of
monitoring stations. There are several environmental networks dedicated to
measuring, collating, and archiving various environmental data. An example
is the “Ammonia Monitoring Network (AMoN)” which as part of the National
Atmospheric Deposition Program (NADP) monitors ammonia gas concentration
in the atmosphere (1). This and other networks are very important to our
understanding of the trends in various environmental data.
Ammonia (NH3) is a compound that exists as a gas in the atmosphere at
atmospheric pressure and temperature. Agriculture practices such as farming and
animal husbandry are primary sources of NH3 to the atmosphere (2). Acting as a
basic gas in the atmosphere, NH3 reacts with acidic species to form ammonium
salts which contribute to aerosol formation as particulate matter (PM) (3, 4).
Figure 1. National Emission Inventory (NEI, 2015), SO2 (reported as S), NOx
and NH3 (both reported as N) emissions from 2001 to 2014. NOx is assumed
to be in the form of NO2 (7). Reproduced with permission from reference (7).
Copyright 2016 Elsevier.
The AMoN project was incorporated as a course-based research experience
in an environmental chemistry class to improve the quantitative reasoning course
goal (8, 9). The hypothesis for the ammonia class project is that the process of
answering the research questions will improve problem-solving and quantitative
skills.
This book chapter is a description of involving a class in a network data
collecting experiment. The success, challenges, and feedback of beginning a
course-based research experience will be discussed. Also discussed will be a
personal reflection of an early career faculty on course design.
58
Course and Project Description
59
Project Implementation
Within the semester, two 30 min workshops were included in the class
schedule to teach data management and graphing skills. The concepts covered
in the data management workshop included: file naming strategies, options for
preserving data, and categories of data. Each team wrote a data management plan
and submitted via Google Docs. Students were able to articulate the class project
goals and plan with the data management plan assignment. Graphing with Google
sheets, classification of variables, and interpretation of R2 values were taught at
the second workshop.
60
After 13 weeks of the monitoring project, the class project was completed
in an 80 min workshop. Using the collated data, students made several graphs
during the workshop to answer the project research questions. Examples of graphs
completed included; line graphs, scatter plots (with Trendline & R2 value), 2D
plot (line graph with 2 y-axes) and a matrix plot (graphical comparison of several
variables). Each graph was copied to a Google slide with a figure number and
short description. A mapping exercise with data from other sites in the state of
Ohio was also completed. Average ammonia concentration for the 6 sites in Ohio
was obtained from the AMoN website and mapped with the Google MyMaps
GIS. Finally, each student wrote a summary which included their observations
and discussion of the team’s results.
Project Results
By the project wrap date, we had five ammonia concentration data points.
The class decided that the best representation of ammonia data was to match
it to the Tuesday dates between the 2 weeks sampling period. For example,
one ammonia concentration value represented the two weeks from Aug 22nd
to Sept 5th. However, for the plotting assignment, that ammonia concentration
was matched to Aug 29th and the corresponding weather data for Aug 29th. A
plot of ammonia concentration and Tuesday dates showed a general increase in
ammonia concentration during Aug to Oct 2017 (Figure 2). Each student made
a plot of ammonia concentration as a dependent variable with their weather data
as an independent variable. Figure 3 is an example of a scatter plot of ammonia
concentration and temperature. Following a discussion of outlier data points,
linear regression analysis was performed with 4 data points, and R2 values were
obtained. On the question of weather conditions effect on ammonia trends, we
observed no correlation between ammonia concentration and pressure or visibility.
A positive correlation with temperature (Figure 4) and a negative correlation with
humidity or wind speed. Ammonia concentration data for the other sites in Ohio
was obtained from AMoN website. A geographical information system plot was
made with average ammonia data for Aug – Oct 2017 (Figure 5). We observed
that Cincinnati (OH27) site had the highest average ammonia concentration, while
the lowest was at the Deer Creek State Park (OH54) site. Finally, the highest
ammonia concentration (2.21 µg/m3) during the Aug – Oct sampling period for
Kenyon site (OH32) corresponded with a complete loss of leaves on trees close
to the sampler.
61
Figure 2. Scatter plot of ammonia concentration (µg/m3) vs date for Aug 22nd
– Oct 31st 2017.
62
Figure 4. Scatter plot of ammonia concentration (µg/m3) vs temperature (°F) for
fall 2017 after removing the possible outlier data point.
Figure 5. GIS plot of average ammonia concentration (µg/m3) for sites within
the state of Ohio for fall 2017 (Aug 22nd – Oct 31st).
63
Assessment
The class project was classified as a formative exercise in the class design and
accounted for 10% of the class grade. Students were allowed to make corrections
after feedback for the full possible point per activity.
A survey (Survey 2, Table 2) was used to evaluate the quantitative reasoning
skills gained from the project. Student response (15 students) showed a significant
number learned or gained the QR skills taught by the project.
64
Discussion
The project was successfully implemented and having the class project
enhanced the communal feel of the class. Use of passive samplers and chemical
analysis conducted at CAL made the project easier to incorporate into the course
schedule without significant change to course content. Students practiced asking
research questions and agreeing on which inquires to pursue. As they were
searching for answers, they learned data management, graphing and visualization
skills. Although we had a small data set, some observations on ammonia
concentration trends were made. The effect of nearby agricultural activities,
leaves loss and decomposition, and urban heat were discussed in summary
submitted by students. In summary, the class project provided a great platform to
enhance the QR designation of the environmental chemistry class.
The time commitment to manage the project was low. After the time required
for initial planning, the bi-weekly sampler change takes about 10 min to complete.
The small time commitment made it easier to juggle with the busy schedule of
academic life. Implementing the project provided an opportunity to collaborate
with colleagues outside of my department in designing pedagogy activities. Most
of the schedule went as planned; we just required an extra half class time to
complete the graph and mapping assignment. In all, it was a successful class
project.
Acknowledgments
I thank the faculty affairs committee of Kenyon College for awarding the
teaching grant that provided funding for this class project. Nathan Wolfe, Social
Science and Data Librarian at Kenyon College, was valuable to the successful
implementation of the class project. He provided expertise in data management
and visualization. I am grateful to colleagues that provided support for the smooth
running of the class project. Steven Vaden, constructed the shelter for the sampler.
Emily Wise managed the finances for the project. Mrs. Shannon Hashman assisted
by making sure that the samplers are mailed back to CAL. Mrs. Carolyn Waggoner
helped by receiving the sampler. Prof. Simon Garcia provided support as the
alternate site manager.
65
References
66
Chapter 5
For over two decades, national organizations (1–4) have called for reform
of undergraduate science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM)
education by replacing content driven curriculum with curricula that focuses
on teaching core concepts and developing skills that support modern scientific
research. Recently, the American Association for the Advancement of Science
has called for revisions of biology curriculum to teach scientific skills by
integrating major principles, such as information flow, with activities that develop
competency in mathematics and provide undergraduate students experiences
in accessing large data sets (5). Ecology, a subject that has always been
interdisciplinary, has placed growing reliance on the use of molecular tools (6)
and the utilization of large databases (7). Unfortunately, most ecology laboratory
teaching manuals do not contain exercises that provide students experience
with molecular ecology, nor exposure to database utilization. [For example,
see Vodopich (8)] DNA barcoding is a technique well suited to ecological
investigations. Species are identified by homology searches of DNA databases
like GenBank (9). Thus, student investigations that utilize DNA barcoding
provide them an introduction to molecular ecology and exposure to publicly
available supercomputing resources. An inquiry investigation was implemented
in the Ecology Laboratory (BIO4490) course taught at the University of Detroit
Mercy (Detroit, MI, USA), where undergraduates conducted nutrient response
experiments with wild duckweed.
DNA barcoding is a technique that is used to identify species by sequencing
short (400 to 800 bp) regions of genomes (10). This strategy involves using
polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers that are homologous to evolutionarily
conserved regions that flank a variable region. The resulting amplicon sequence is
determined by combining Sanger sequencing with capillary electrophoresis (11).
The resulting sequence is used to search nucleotide databases such as GenBank
(9, 12).
Ecologists use DNA barcoding in several applications such as identifing
species from small fragments collected from environmental samples, identifying
microorganisms, and identify species from individuals that do not contain
definitive morphological features (10). Though there is no single primer pair
that can be used to barcode all of life, a limited collection of primer pairs have
emerged that can be used to identify broad collections of taxonomic groups (10,
13). For plants, primers that hybridize to the plastid genome are widely used
because each plant cell contains several copies of its plastid genome (14). Two
commonly used primer pairs are rbcL which amplifies a 654 bp portion of the
gene encoding the large subunit of ribulose bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase
(RuBisCO) and atpF-atpH which amplifies 578 to 707 bp intergenic region of
the ATP synthase locus (15, 16).
Duckweed plants were used in the Ecology Laboratory course because it
is becoming an excellent model system. They are small free-floating plants
that proliferate in the 48 contiguous states, Hawaii, and southern Canada
(17). Duckweed plants grow easily in the laboratory (18), have rapid clonal
reproduction (19) and are extensively used in toxicology testing (20). Duckweed
68
are monocots in the clade Lemnoideae (21). Unfortunately, because of its small
size and infrequent flowering, it is a difficult plant to identify at the species level
(22). In the past, biochemical assays, such as chromatography, were used to
confirm species identification (22). DNA barcoding is now the tool of choice for
duckweed identification. For example, the Rutgers Duckweed Stock Cooperative
only accepts germplasm donation that has been identified by DNA barcoding (23).
A standard practice in field ecology is to identify species found in field
collections. Typically, this is done with the aid of dichotomous keys and field
guides. Unfortunately, reliable identification of duckweed based solely on
morphology is not possible. Thus, a modified version of the DNA Learning
Center’s Barcoding 101 curriculum was used to identify duckweed species (13).
Plant Material
DNA Isolation
Total DNA was isolated using the Wizard Genomic DNA Purification Kit
(Promega Corporation, Madison, Wisconsin, USA). Splash goggles and plastic
gloves were worn during the procedure because some of the reagents in the kit
contain chaotropic agents. The work-flow is illustrated in Figure 2. Forceps were
used to transfer clonal duckweed clusters into 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes. Up
to 40 mg (fresh weight) of plant materials was homogenized in 100 μL of Nuclei
Lysis Solution using plastic pestles design to fit inside the microcentrifuge tubes.
The material was ground by hand until the plant materials were well macerated.
An additional 500 μL of Nuclei Lysis Solution was added to each tube and mixed
by inverting. The manufacturer’s protocol was followed for the remainder of the
DNA isolation process.
69
Figure 1. Wild population of duckweed. Panel A: A mixed species community
growing in Lake Saint Clair, Michigan. The arrow points at a water lily, a
member of the Nymphaeaceae. Close-up photographs of Spirodela polyrhiza
(Panel B), Lemma minor (Panel C), and Wolffia columbiana (Panel D). The bars
are 2-mm size standards. (see color insert)
70
Barcoding Primers
PCR Conditions
71
at 94 °C for 15 s, template priming at 50 °C for 15 s, and polymerization at 72 °C
for 45 s. The final polymerase extension was performed at 72 °C for 300 s (26).
The PCR products were stored overnight at 4 °C.
If there were poor PCR product yields with either primer set, the following
PCR protocol was attempted. Genomic DNA and primers were combined as
described previously. Initial template denaturation was at 95 °C for 180 s,
followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 60 s, annealing at 55 °C for
45 s, and primer extension at 72 °C for 45 s. The final polymerase extension was
performed at 72 ○C for 300 s.
Species Identification
References
76
5. Bauerle, C.; DePass, A.; Lynn, D.; O’Connor, C.; Singer, S.; Withers, M.;
Anderson, C. W.; Donovan, S.; Drew, S.; Ebert-May, D.; Gross, L.; Hoskins,
S. G.; Labov, J.; Lopatto, D.; McClatchey, W.; Varma-Nelson, P.; Pelaez,
N.; Poston, M.; Tanner, K.; Wessner, D.; White, H.; Wood, W.; Wubah, D.
Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: A Call to Action;
American Association for the Advancement of Science: Washington, DC,
2009.
6. Rowe, G.; Sweet, M.; Beebee, T. J. C. An Introduction to Molecular Ecology,
3rd ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, United Kingdom, 2017.
7. LaDeau, S. L.; Han, B. A.; Rosi-Marshall, E. J.; Weathers, K. C. The next
decade of big data in ecosystem science. Ecosystems 2017, 20, 274–283.
8. Vodopich, D. S. Ecology Laboratory Manual; McGraw-Hill Education:
Columbus, OH, 2009.
9. Benson, D. A.; Cavanaugh, M.; Clark, K.; Karsch-Mizrachi, I.; Lipman,
D. J.; Ostell, J.; Sayers, E. W. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41,
D36−D42. http://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1195 (accessed December 31,
2017).
10. Ajmal Ali, M.; Gyulai, G.; Hidvégi, N.; Kerti, B.; Al Hemaid, F. M. A.;
Pandey, A. K.; Lee, J. The changing epitome of species identification – DNA
barcoding. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2014, 21, 204–231.
11. Metzker, M. L. Emerging technologies in DNA sequencing. Genome Res.
2005, 15 (12), 1767–1776.
12. National Center for Biotechnology Information. GenBank Overview Web
site. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/ (accessed November 2, 2017).
13. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. DNA barcoding 101: Using DNA barcodes
to identify and classify living things, 2014. DNA Learning Center Web site.
http://www.dnabarcoding101.org/ (accessed December 31, 2017).
14. Kubínová, Z.; Janáček, J.; Lhotáková, Z.; Kubínová, L.; Albrechtová, J.
Unbiased estimation of chloroplast number in mesophyll cells: Advantage
of a genuine three-dimensional approach. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 609–620.
15. Hollingsworth, P. M.; Graham, S. W.; Little, D. P. Choosing and using
a plant DNA barcode. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e19254. http://dx.doi.org/
10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0019254 (accessed December 31, 2017).
16. Hollingsworth, P. M.; Forrest, L. L.; Spouge, J. L.; Hajibabaei, M.;
Ratnasingham, S.; van der Bank, M.; Chase, M. W.; Cowan, R. S.;
Erickson, D. L.; Fazekas, A. J.; Graham, S. W.; James, K. E.; Kim, K.-J.;
Kress, W. J.; Schneider, H.; van AlphenStahl, J.; Barrett, S. C. H.; van
den Berg, C.; Bogarin, D.; Burgess, K. S.; Cameron, K. M.; Carine, M.;
Chacón, J.; Clark, A.; Clarkson, J. J.; Conrad, F.; Devey, D. S.; Ford, C.
S.; Hedderson, T. A. J.; Hollingsworth, M. L.; Husband, B. C.; Kelly, L. J.;
Kesanakurti, P. R.; Kim, J. S.; Kim, Y.-D.; Lahaye, R.; Lee, H.-L.; Long, D.
G.; Madriñán, S.; Maurin, O.; Meusnier, I.; Newmaster, S. G.; Park, C.-W.;
Percy, D. M.; Petersen, G.; Richardson, J. E.; Salazar, G. A.; Savolainen, V.;
Seberg, O.; Wilkinson, M. J.; Yi, D.-K.; Little, D. P. A DNA barcode for
land plants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106, 12794–12797CBOL
Plant Working Group.
77
17. USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. The Plants Database Home
Page. http://plants.usda.gov/ (accessed December 31, 2017).
18. Cross, J. W. The Charms of Duckweed Home Page. http://www.mobot.org/
jwcross/duckweed/duckweed.htm (accessed December 31, 2017).
19. Ziegler, P.; Adelmann, K.; Zimmer, S.; Schmidt, C.; Appenroth, K. J.
Relative in vitro growth rates of duckweeds (Lemnaceae) – the most rapidly
growing higher plants. Plant Biol. 2015, 17 (Suppl 1), 33–41.
20. Wang, W. Literature review on duckweed toxicity testing. Environ. Res.
1990, 52, 7–22.
21. Encyclopedia of Life. Lemnoideae Web site. http://eol.org/pages/10553303/
overview (accessed November 18, 2017).
22. Les, D. H.; Landolt, E.; Crawford, D. J. Systematics of the Lemnaceae
(duckweeds): inferences from micromolecular and morphological data.
Plant Syst. Evol. 1997, 204, 161–177.
23. Rutgers University. Rutgers Duckweed Stock Cooperative Home Page.
http://www.ruduckweed.org/ (accessed September 21, 2017).
24. Wang, W.; Wu, Y.; Yan, Y.; Ermakova, M.; Kerstetter, R.; Messing, J. DNA
barcoding of the Lemnaceae, a family of aquatic monocots. BMC Plant Biol
2010, 10, 205. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-10-20.
25. Sambrook, J.; Fritsch, E. F.; Maniatis, T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory
Manual. 2 ed.; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory: Cold Spring Harbor, NY,
1989; Vol. 3.
26. Waksman Institute of Microbiology. Protocol of DNA barcode duckweeds
by atpF-atpH marker, 2013. Spirodela Database Web site. https:/
/www.waksman.rutgers.edu/spirodela/pages/protocol-dna-barcode-
duckweeds-atpf-atph-marker (accessed December 30, 2017).
27. Chromas, version 2.6.4; Technelsium LLC: South Brisbane, Queenland,
Australia, 2017.
28. European Molecular Biology Laboratory. Pairwise Sequence Alignment
Web site. https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/psa/ (accessed November 12, 2017).
29. Li, W.; Cowley, A.; Uludag, M.; Gur, T.; McWilliam, H.; Squizzato, S.;
Park, Y. M.; Buso, N.; Lopez, R. The EMBL-EBI bioinformatics web and
programmatic tools framework. Nucleic Acids Res 2015, 43, W580−W584.
https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv279 (accessed December 31, 2017).
30. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. DNA Subway: Fast Track
to Gene Annotation and Genome Analysis Home Page.
https://dnasubway.cyverse.org/ (accessed November 11, 2017).
31. Antin, P.; Lyons, E.; Merchant, N.; Micklos, D.; Vaughn, M.; Ware, D.
Cyverse Home Page. http://www.cyverse.org/ (accessed November 11,
2017).
32. Extreme Science and Engineering Discovery Environment. XSEDE Home
Page. https://www.xsede.org/ (accessed November 11, 2017).
33. Altschul, S. F.; Gish, W.; Miller, W.; Myers, E. W.; Lipman, D. J. Basic local
alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 1990, 215, 403–410.
34. Edgar, R. C. MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced
time and space complexity. BMC Bioinf. 2004, 5, 113. https://doi.org/
10.1186/1471-2105-5-113 (accessed November 30, 2017).
78
35. Felsenstein, J. PHYLIP: Phylogeny Inference Package Home Page. http://
evolution.genetics.washington.edu/phylip/ (accessed November 13, 2017).
36. Landolt, E., Lemnaceae, Flora of North America North of Mexico; Flora of
North America Association: New York, 2000; p 200. http://www.efloras.org/
florataxon.aspx?flora_id=1&taxon_id=10488 (accessed December 31,
2017).
37. Hartig, J. H.; Zarull, M. A.; Corkum, L. D.; Green, N.; Ellison, R.; Cook, A.;
Green, E.; Norwood, G. Habitat management lessons from the environs of
the Detroit River International Wildlife Refuge. J. Great Lakes Res. 2014,
40 (Suppl 2), 31–36.
38. de Vienne, D. M. Lifemap: Exploring the Entire Tree of Life PLOS Biol
2016, 14, e2001624. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2001624 (accessed
December 31, 2017).
39. Maddison, D. R.; Schulz, K.-S.; Maddison, W. P. The Tree of Life Web
Project. Zootaxa 2007, 1668, 19–40.
40. Soltis, P. S.; Soltis, D. E. Ancient WGD events as drivers of key innovations
in angiosperms. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2016, 30 (Suppl. C), 159–165.
41. Hall, B. G. Phylogenetic Trees Made Easy : How-to Manual, 4th ed.; Sinauer
Associates: Sunderland, MA, 2011.
42. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny
Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG III.
Bot. J. Linean. Soc. 2009, 161, 105–121.
43. Schloss, P. D.; Handelsman, J. Metagenomics for studying unculturable
microorganisms: Cutting the Gordian knot. Genome Biol. 2005, 6, 229.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/gb-2005-6-8-229.
44. Thomas, T.; Gilbert, J.; Meyer, F. Metagenomics - A guide from sampling to
data analysis. Microb. Inform. Exp. 2012, 2, 1−12. https://doi.org/10.1186/
2042-5783-2-3 (accessed December 31, 2017).
45. Langille, M. G. I.; Zaneveld, J.; Caporaso, J. G.; McDonald, D.; Knights, D.;
Reyes, J. A.; Clemente, J. C.; Burkepile, D. E.; Vega Thurber, R. L.;
Knight, R.; Beiko, R. G.; Huttenhower, C. Predictive functional profiling
of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat.
Biotechnol. 2013, 31, 814–821.
46. Quail, M.; Smith, M.; Coupland, P.; Otto, T.; Harris, S.; Connor, T.;
Bertoni, A.; Swerdlow, H.; Gu, Y. A tale of three next generation
sequencing platforms: comparison of Ion Torrent, Pacific Biosciences
and Illumina MiSeq sequencers. BMC Genomics 2012, 13, 341.
https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-13-341 (accessed December 31, 2017).
47. Menegon, M.; Cantaloni, C.; Rodriguez-Prieto, A.; Centomo, C.;
Abdelfattah, A.; Rossato, M.; Bernardi, M.; Xumerle, L.; Loader, S.;
Delledonne, M. On site DNA barcoding by nanopore sequencing. PLoS
ONE 2017, 12, e0184741. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184741.
79
Chapter 6
Introduction
Throughout the history of civilization, humankind has almost always lived
near water. Even desert dwellers knew exactly where water was to be found,
precisely because the presence of water meant life. Yet for as long, brackish water,
saline water, and water that has in any other way been contaminated with some
foreign matter has been of concern to people, precisely because it is either difficult
or impossible to use (1–12). Saline water is certainly still useful for fishing and
for waterborne traffic, but is routinely far too salty to drink.
Experimental Section
Diethylene triamine and tetraethyelene pentaamine were purchased from
Aldrich and used with no further purification, as were octanal and dodecanal.
Solvents were purchased and used without distillation.
The formation of all ligands was performed in monoglyme, and in toluene,
with the amine first measured out and dissolved in the solvent. The aldehyde was
added only after the amine was completely solvated.
All solutions were stirred for a minimum of 16 hours, during which time
minimal color changes occurred from clear to a very pale yellow.
Samples of each ligand were dried by rotary evaporation, followed by a
minimum of 16 hours on a Schlenk line, and solvated in CDCl3 for characterization
via NMR. Both ligands were examined by 1H NMR using a Jeol 300 MHz
instrument, at 25°C.
Table 1 lists the amounts of amine and aldehyde used in production of Ligands
1 and 2.
Conclusions
This duo of multi-dentate ligands is both very easy and straightforward to
synthesize, requiring no specialized reaction apparatus. Because of a single,
diagnostic imine peak in an otherwise cluttered 1H NMR, the ligands can be
characterized without ambiguity, and without having to resolve the aliphatic
region of the 1H NMR spectrum.
The ligands produced here all have minimal functionality, yet possess enough
that they have proven to be excellent chelators. Their syntheses have been
accomplished by multiple undergraduate researchers.
The formation of metal-ligand complexes that precipitate readily from water
indicate that these ligands may find use as an inexpensive form of water remediator.
The fact that one of these ligands is capable of solvating metal salts into
non-aqueous media when dry metal salts were added directly to non-aqueous
solutions of the ligands was unexpected. It is an intriguing phenomenon however,
85
one that may hold promise for the use of these ligands in previously unexpected
applications.
References
1. Letter Report Assessing the USGS National Water Quality Assessment
Program’s Science Plan; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 2011.
2. Letter Report Assessing the USGS National Water Quality Assessment
Program's Science Framework; National Academies Press: Washington,
DC, 2010.
3. Vickers, A. The Handbook of Water Use and Conservation; WaterFlow Press,
2001; ISBN: 1-931579-07.
4. Use of Water in Agriculture. http://lenntech.com/water-food-agriculture
(accessed December 11, 2017).
5. Saline Water Conversion; Advances in Chemistry 27; American Chemical
Society, January 1, 1960.
6. Gould, R. F., Ed.; Saline Water Conversion − II; Advances in Chemistry 38;
American Chemical Society, January 1, 1963.
7. Ghaffour, N.; Missimer, T. M.; Amy, G. L. Technical review and evaluation
of the economics of water desalination: Current and future challenges for
better water supply sustainability. Desalination 2013, 309, 197–207.
8. Kavanaugh, M. C., Leckie, J. O., Eds.; Particulates in Water:
Characterization, Fate, Effects, and Removal; Advances in Chemistry 189;
American Chemical Society, November 1980.
9. Baker, A. Ed.; Environmental Chemistry of Lakes and Reservoirs; Advances
in Chemistry 237; American Chemical Society, May 05, 1994.
10. Urban Stormwater Management in the United States; National Academies
Press: Washington, DC, 2009.
11. Binnie, C. Basic Water Treatment 4th ed.; Royal Society of Chemistry:
London, 2009l ISBN 9781847558787.
12. Benvenuto, M. A. Industrial Chemistry; DeGruyter, Berlin, 2014.
13. Gray, J. Ed.; Water Contamination Emergencies: Can We Cope?; Royal
Society of Chemistry: London, 2006; ISBN 9780854046287.
14. Thompson, K. C. Ed.; Water Contamination Emergencies: Enhancing
our Response; Royal Society of Chemistry: London, 2006; ISBN
9780854046584.
15. Barber, N. L. Summary of Estimated Water Use in the United States in 2005;
U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2009-3098; U.S. Geological Survey,
2009.
16. Liquid Assets 2000; EPA-840-B-00-001; Office of Water, United States
Environmental Protection Agency: Washington, DC, 2000.
17. Dewan, N., Majestic, B. J., Ketterer, M. E., Miller-Schulze, J. P., Shafer,
M. M., Schauer, J. J., Solomon, P. A., Artamonova, M., Chen, B. B.,
Imashev, S. A., Carmichael, G. R. Tracing Dust Sources Using Stable Lead
and Strontium Isotopes in Central Asia. In Trace Materials in Air, Soil,
86
and Water; ACS Symposium Series 1210; American Chemical Society:
Washington, DC, 2015; Chapter 4, pp 79−98.
18. Bennett, K. Disappearance of the Aral Sea. World Resources Institute. http:/
/www.wri.org/blog/2008/05/disappearance-aral-sea (accessed December 11,
2017).
19. Nutrient Control Actions for Improving Water Quality in the Mississippi River
Basin and Northern Gulf of Mexico; National Academies Press: Washington,
DC, 2009.
20. Nissenbaum, A. The Dead Sea – An economic resource for 10,000 years.
Hydrobiologia 1993, 267, 127–141.
21. Jin, Y.; Wang, Q.; Taynton, P.; Zhang, W. Dynamic covalent chemistry
approaches toward macrocycles, molecular cages, and polymers. Acc.
Chem. Res. 2014, 47 (5), 1575–1586.
22. Izatt, R. M. The synthesis and ion bindings of synthetic multidentate
macrocyclic compounds. Chem. Rev. 1974, 74 (3), 351–384.
23. Bradshaw, J. S.; Izatt, R. M. Crown ethers: The search for selective ion
ligating agents. Acc. Chem. Res. 1997, 30 (8), 338–345.
24. Gordon, A. E. V.; Xu, J.; Raymond, K. N.; Durbin, P. Rational design of
sequestering agents for plutonium and other actinides. Chem. Rev. 2003,
103 (11), 4207–4282.
25. Sessler, J. L.; Melfi, P. J.; Dan Pantos, G. Uranium complexes of multidentate
N-donor ligands. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2006, 250, 816–843.
26. Hayes, C. E.; Leznoff, D. B. Actinide coordination and organometallic
complexes with multidentate polyamido ligands. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2014,
266–267, 155–170.
27. Hancock, R. D.; Martell, A. E. Ligand design for selective complexation of
metal ions in aqueous solution. Chem. Rev. 1989, 89 (8), 1875–1914.
28. Osakai, T.; Ogata, A.; Ebina, K. Hydration of ions in organic solvent and its
significance in the gibbs free energy of ion transfer between two immiscible
liquids. J. Phys. Chem. B 1997, 101, 8341–8348.
29. Kemsley, J. Extracting inorganic ions, organically. C&EN Global Entrep.
2016, 94, 18–19.
87
Chapter 7
90
Kβ lines seen on the spectrum. (36–38). In this study, three standard reference
materials and twenty-five makeup samples were analyzed with a Bruker S1 Titan
handheld XRF analyzer to compare their elemental compositions.
Experimental Methods
Standard reference materials (SRMs) were obtained from the National
Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). SRM 2586 is the Trace Elements
in Soil standard containing lead from paint (Nominal 500 mg lead/kg). This soil
standard has reported certified mass fractions for arsenic, cadmium, chromium,
and lead. It also has reported reference mass fractions for other elements
including aluminum, copper, iron, manganese, potassium, titanium, strontium,
and zinc (39). SRM 2709a, a San Joaquin Soil standard, has certified mass
fractions reported for several elements including iron, aluminum, potassium,
manganese, and strontium, and has reported reference mass fractions for many
elements including zinc and rubidium (40). SRM 2711a is a Montana II Soil
standard. It has reported certified mass fractions for many elements including
aluminum, potassium, titanium, iron, strontium, lead, copper and zinc (41). It
also has reported reference mass fractions for other elements including rubidium.
A Bruker S1 TITAN 600-800 handheld XRF analyzer was used to analyze the
samples and SRMs. For each SRM, five separate samples (3.0 g per sample)
were analyzed five times each for 120 s. The instrument was mounted on the
TITAN bench-top stand. Each sample was placed on the safety platform to ensure
the samples were analyzed from an equal distance. Before each analysis, each
sample cup was removed from the safety platform and rotated. The instrument
used a voltage of 45 kV and a current of 10 µA, with an Al/Ti filter. A Dell laptop
computer with Bruker S1sync software was used to control the instrument, and
data were collected and analyzed with the soil calibration fundamental parameters
(FP) method. The soil calibration method provided a basic set of excitation
conditions that could target most of the elements of interest. This calibration
has been optimized for a SiO2 matrix. The reported elements with this method
include Mg, Al, P, S, Cl, K, Ca, Ti, V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Se, Rb, Sr,
Y, Zr, Nb, Mo, Rh, Pd, Ag, Cd, Sn, Sb, Ba, La, Ce, Hf, Ta, W, Pt, Au, Hg, Tl, Pb,
Bi, Th, and U (42). Characteristic peaks for each element were identified using
S1PXRF software from Bruker. The SRMs, used as provided, were placed into
Chemplex Spectrocertified® Quality XRF sample cups (31.0 mm × 22.4 mm)
and were covered with Chemplex Spectromembrane® perforated thin film mylar
polyester sample support carrier films (3.6 µm) with a sealing ring. For each of
the standards, the concentrations (averages and standard deviations) of various
elements were determined and compared to the NIST standard values. The Limit
of Detection (LOD) and Limit of Quantitation (LOQ) for each the analyzed
elements using the soil calibration method were provided by Bruker (42). Those
reported in this study are shown in Table 1. Twenty-five mineral eyeshadow
and foundations were analyzed with a Bruker S1 TITAN 600-800 handheld XRF
instrument as described for the SRMs. Each of the eyeshadow samples were
measured out to one sample (6.0 g per sample) and analyzed five times for 120
91
s. Each of the foundation samples were measured out to five samples (7.0 g per
sample) and analyzed for five times each for 120 s. Results are reported in ppm
as average concentration ± standard deviation.
Table 1. Detection limits for selected elements with the S1 TITAN handheld
XRF analyzer using the soil calibration method (42)
Al K Ti Mn Fe Cu Zn Rb Sr Pb
LODa 960 41 20 18 13 5 3 3 4 11
(ppm)
LOQb 4800 205 100 90 65 25 15 15 20 55
(ppm)
a LOD, Limit of Detection. b LOQ, Limit of Quantitation.
93
Table 2. Concentrations of strontium, zinc, iron, aluminum, and potassium from analysis with the handheld XRF compared to the
NIST reported values for the SRMs where the analysis of three soil standards reported less than 15% errora
%
Sr (ppm) Zn (ppm) % Error Fe (ppm) % Error Al (ppm) % Error K (ppm) % Error
Errorb
2586 83 ± 2 311 ± 8 46410 ± 280 71648 ± 1557 10627 ± 154
XRFc (2.3)d (2.7) (0.6) (2.2) (1.5)
1.2 11.5 10.0 7.7 8.8
2586 84 ± 8 352 ± 16 51610 ± 890 66520 ± 760 9760 ± 180
SRM (9.5) (4.5) (1.7) (1.1) (1.8)
2709a 243 ± 4 88 ± 2 31676 ± 281 71379 ± 16000 20607 ± 810
XRF (1.5) (6.2) (0.9) (22) (6.6)
1.7 13.7 5.7 3.1 2.3
2709a 239 ± 6 103 ± 4 33600 ± 700 73700 ± 16000 21100 ± 600
SRM (2.5) (3.9) (2.1) (22) (2.8)
94
value. c Values (average ± standard deviation) for XRF analysis with handheld instrument. d Percent relative standard deviation.
Table 3. Concentrations of lead, manganese, titanium, copper, and rubidium from analysis with the handheld XRF compared to the
NIST reported values for the SRMs where the analysis of two soil standards reported less than 15% errora
Ti Cu Rb
Pb (ppm) % Errorb Mn (ppm) % Error % Error % Error % Error
(ppm) (ppm) (ppm)
2586 450 ± 9 901 ± 18 6763 ± 117 77 ± 2
N.D.g
XRFc (2.1)d (1.7) (1.7) (2.6)
4.1 9.8 10.0 5.0
2586 432 ± 17 17070 ± 840 6050 ± 660 81
N.D.
SRM (3.9) (4.9) (11) (0)
2709a Below 484 ± 20 3930 ± 220 43 ± 3 89 ± 2
XRF LOQe (4.2) (5.6) (7.0)f (2.1)
8.4 17.0 27 10.2
2709a 17.3 ± 0.1 529 ± 18 3360 ± 70 33.9 ±0.5 99 ± 3
SRM (1.0) (3.4) (2.1) (1.5) (3.0)
95
Values (average ± standard deviation) for XRF analysis with handheld instrument. d Percent relative standard deviation. e LOQ, level of quantitation of
55 ppm. f Near LOQ of 25 ppm for Cu. g N.D., not detected.
Table 4. Consumer mineral makeup analyzed by XRF
Designation Makeup Identifier Type
M2 Danzig Eye Shadow
M3 Paranoid Eye Shadow
M4 Tan Foundation
M5 Water Lily Eye Shadow
M6 Sex Kitten Eye Shadow
M7 Wild Flower Eye Shadow
M8 Soiree Eye Shadow
M9 Berry Flambe Eye Shadow
M16 Pink Eye Shadow
M17 Green Eye Shadow
M20 Red Eye Shadow
M28 Gray Eye Shadow
M 35 Beige Eye Shadow
M39 Raw Power Eye Shadow
M40 Black No.1 Eye Shadow
M41 Electric Warrior Eye Shadow
M42 Synergy Eye Shadow
M43 Liberty Eye Shadow
M44 True Gold Eye Shadow
M45 Bare Skin Eye Shadow
M46 Queen Tiffany Eye Shadow
M47 Fairly Medium Foundation
M48 Golden Tan Foundation
M49 Medium Deep Foundation
M50 Deep Foundation
96
Figure 1. Concentration of strontium and rubidium in the makeup samples as
determined by XRF analysis.
97
Figure 3. Concentrations of aluminum, potassium and iron in the makeup
samples as determined by XRF analysis.
98
Figure 4. Concentration of titanium in the makeup samples as determined by
XRF analysis.
99
Conclusions
A soil calibration method with a handheld XRF was used to analyze three soil
standard reference materials and twenty-five consumer mineral makeup samples.
The results from the soil method can be used to quickly compare the elemental
composition of the different makeup samples Comparing the reported results with
the certified and reference values of the standard reference materials was used to
verify that an element was present and the XRF’s precision and accuracy. There
were five elements identified in some or all the makeup samples which were
strontium, zinc, iron, aluminum, and potassium. These elements were verified
with all three soil standard reference materials. In contrast, there were five other
elements that were verified with two soil standard reference materials. These five
elements were lead, manganese, titanium, copper, and rubidium. Of these five,
all but lead were found in some or all the samples. None of the cosmetic samples
analyzed contained levels above the FDA allowable levels of toxic metals (Pb,
As, or Hg) (2). The XRF method is a quick way to analyze several samples. An
instrument-supplied calibration method such as the soil calibration allows quick
analysis of multiple elements to compare between samples. If more labor, time,
and cost-intensive investigations are to be performed, this method provides an
efficient way to quickly and accurately screen candidates before further analysis.
Acknowledgments
Work reported in this publication was supported by the National Institutes
of Health Common Fund and Office of Scientific Workforce Diversity under
three linked awards RL5GM1189XX, TL4GM1189XX, 1UL1GM1189XX
administered by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences, the University
of Detroit Mercy’s McNichols Faculty Assembly Internal Research Fund, and the
College of Engineering & Science at the University of Detroit Mercy.
References
1. Söğüt, O.; Reyhanhoğlu, M.; Ezer, M.; Baltaş, H. Elemental Compositions of
Some Cosmetic Products Marketed in Turkey. Fresen. Environ. Bull. 2016,
25, 1068–1077.
2. Code of Federal Regulations Title 21 Food and Drugs; U.S. Food and
Drug Administration, Office of the Federal Register National Archives and
Records Administration: Washington, DC, 2017.
3. Kulikov, E.; Latham, K.; Adams, M. J. Classification and Discrimination of
Some Cosmetic Face Powders Using XRF Spectrometry with Chemometric
Data Analysis. X-Ray Spectrom. 2012, 41 (6), 410–415.
4. Nouioui, M. A.; Mahjoubi, S.; Ghorbel, A.; Ben Haj Yahia, M. Health Risk
Assessment of Heavy Metals in Traditional Cosmetics Sold in Tunisian Local
Markets. International Scholarly Research Notices 2016, 2016, 1–12.
5. Yoshihisa, Y.; Shimizu, T. Metal allergy and systemic contact dermatitis: an
overview. Dermatol. Res. Pract. 2012, 2012, 749561, DOI: 10.1155/2012/
749561.
100
6. Park, M. E.; Zippin, J. H. Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Cosmetics.
Dermatol. Clin. 2014, 32 (1), 1–11.
7. Needleman, H. Lead Poisoning. Annu. Rev. Med. 2004, 55 (1), 209–222.
8. Melquiades, F.; Parreira, P.; Endo, L.; Santos, G.; Wouk, L.; Filho, O.
Portable EDXRF for Quality Assurance of Cosmetics. Cosmetics 2015, 2
(3), 277–285.
9. Melquiades, F. L.; Ferreira, D. D.; Appoloni, C. R.; Lopes, F.; Lonni, A. G.;
Oliveira, F. M.; Duarte, J. C. Titanium Dioxide Determination in Sunscreen
by Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence Methodology. Anal. Chim. Acta
2008, 613 (2), 135–143.
10. Favaro, P. C.; Bode, P.; De Nadai Fernandes, E. A. Trace Elements in Nail
Polish As a Source of Contamination of Nail Clippings When Used in
Epidemiological Studies. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2005, 264 (1), 61–65.
11. McIntosh, K. G.; Guimaraes, D.; Cusack, M. J.; Vershinin, A.; Chen, Z.
W.; Yang, K.; Parsons, P. J. Evaluation of Portable XRF Instrumentation for
Assessing Potential Environmental Exposure to Toxic Elements. Int. J. Env.
Anal. Chem. 2016, 96 (1), 15–37.
12. Buddhachat, K.; Klinhom, S.; Siengdee, P.; Brown, J. L.; Nomsiri, R.;
Kaewmong, P.; Thitaram, C.; Mahakkanukrauh, P.; Nganvongpanit, K.
Elemental Analysis of Bone, Teeth, Horn and Antler in Different Animal
Species Using Non-Invasive Handheld X-ray Fluorescence. PLoS One
2016, 11 (5), e0155458.
13. Alonso-Hernández, C. M.; Gómez-Batista, M.; Díaz-Asencio, M.; Estévez-
Alvares, J.; Padilla-Alvares, R. Total Arsenic in Marine Organisms from
Cienfuegos Bay (Cuba). Food Chem. 2012, 130 (4), 973–976.
14. Fleming, D. E.; Nader, M. N.; Foran, K. A.; Groskopf, C.; Reno, M. C.;
Ware, C. S.; Tehrani, M.; Guimaraes, D.; Parsons, P. J. Assessing Arsenic
and Selenium in a Single Nail Clipping Using Portable X-ray Fluorescence.
Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2017, 120, 1–6.
15. Perring, L.; Nicolas, M.; Andrey, D.; Fragnière Rime, C.; Richoz-Payot, J.;
Dubascoux, S.; Poitevin, E. Development and Validation of an ED-XRF
Method for the Fast Quantification of Mineral Elements in Dry Pet Food
Samples. Food Analytical Methods 2017, 10 (5), 1469–1478.
16. Raggi, M. A.; Lucchini, F.; Da Re, P. X-ray Fluorescence Determination
of Bromine Traces in Pharmaceutical Formulations Containing Sodium
Diclofenac. Boll. Chim. Farm. 1993, 132 (1), 29–31.
17. Turner, A.; Filella, M. Bromine in Plastic Consumer Products – Evidence for
the Widespread Recycling of Electronic Waste. Sci. Total Environ. 2017,
601-602 (Supplement C), 374–379.
18. Turner, A.; Comber, S.; Rees, A. B.; Gkiokas, D.; Solman, K. Metals in Boat
Paint Fragments from Slipways, Repair Facilities and Abandoned Vessels:
An Evaluation Using Field Portable XRF. Talanta 2015, 131, 372–8.
19. Labond, J. L.; Stroeters, N. H.; Benvenuto, M. A.; Roberts-Kirchhoff, E. S.
Analysis of Nine Edible Clay Supplements with a Handheld XRF Analyzer.
In Chemistry of Food and Food Contact Materials: From Production to
Plate; Benvenuto, M. A., Ahuja, S., Duncan, T. V., Noonan, G. O., Roberts-
101
Kirchhoff, E. S., Eds.; ACS Symposium Series 1159; American Chemical
Society: Washington, DC, 2014; pp 99−111.
20. Anderson, D. L. Determination of Bromine in Regulated Foods with a Field-
Portable X-ray Fluorescence Analyzer. J. AOAC Int. 2009, 92, 502–510.
21. Anderson, D. L. Analysis of Beverages for Hg, As, Pb, and Cd with a Field
Portable X-ray Fluorescence analyzer. J. AOAC Int. 2010, 93, 683–693.
22. Palmer, P. T.; Palmer, P. T.; Jacobs, R.; Baker, P. E.; Ferguson, K. Use of
Field-Portable XRF Analyzers for Rapid Screening of Toxic Elements in
FDA-Regulated Products. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009, 57 (7), 2605–2613.
23. Perring, L.; Andrey, D.; Basic-Dvorzak, M.; Hammer, D. Rapid
Quantification of Iron, Copper and Zinc in Food Premixes Using Energy
Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence. J. Food Compost. Anal. 2005, 18 (7),
655–663.
24. Nielson, K. K.; Mahoney, A. W.; Williams, L. S.; Rogers, V. C. Screening
for Elevated Lead and Tin in Fruits and Vegetables by Nondestructive X-ray
Fluorescence. J. Food Compost. Anal. 1991, 4 (3), 206–215.
25. Nielson, K. K.; Mahoney, A. W.; Williams, L. S.; Rogers, V. C. X-ray
Fluorescence Measurements of Mg, P, S, CI, K, Ca, Mn, Fe, Cu, and Zn in
Fruits, Vegetables, And Grain Products. J. Food Compost. Anal. 1991, 4
(1), 39–51.
26. Manhas Verbi Pereira, F.; Rodrigues Pereira-Filho, E.; Maretti Silveira
Bueno, M. I. Development of a Methodology for Calcium, Iron, Potassium,
Magnesium, Manganese, and Zinc Quantification in Teas Using X-ray
Spectroscopy and Multivariate Calibration. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54
(16), 5723–5730.
27. Da-Col, J.; eacute; A; Da-Col, J.; eacute; Bueno, M. I. M. S.; Melquiades, F.;
aacute; bio, L. Fast and Direct Na and K Determination in Table, Marine,
and Low-Sodium Salts by X-ray Fluorescence and Chemometrics. J. Agric.
Food Chem. 2015, 63 (9), 2406–2412.
28. Perring, L.; Andrey, D. ED-XRF as a Tool for Rapid Minerals Control in
Milk-Based Products. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2003, 51 (15), 4207–4212.
29. Zucchi, O. L. A. D.; Moreira, S.; Salvador, M. J.; Santos, L. L. Multielement
Analysis of Soft Drinks by X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry. J. Agric. Food
Chem. 2005, 53 (20), 7863–7869.
30. Hepp, N. M. Spectrometric Determination of Chromium in FD&C Blue No.
1 by X-ray Fluorescence. J. AOAC Int. 1996, 79 (5), 1189–1190.
31. Saper, R. B.; Kales, S. N.; Paquin, J.; Burns, M. J.; Eisenberg, D. M.;
Davis, R. B.; Phillips, R. S. Heavy Metal Content of Ayurvedic Herbal
Medicine Products. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 2004, 292 (23), 2868–2873.
32. Garshott, D. M.; Macdonald, E. A.; Murray, M. N.; Benvenuto, M.
A.; Roberts-Kirchhoff, E. S. Elemental Analysis of a Variety of Dried,
Powdered, Kelp Food Supplements for the Presence of Heavy Metals via
Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence Spectrometry. In It’s All In the
Water: Studies of Materials and Conditions in Fresh and Salt Water Bodies;
Benvenuto, M. A.; Roberts-Kirchhoff, E. S.; Murray, M. N.; Garshott,
D. M., Eds.; ACS Symposium Series 1086; American Chemical Society:
Washington, DC, 2011, pp 123−133.
102
33. Chan, J. C.; Palmer, P. T. Determination of Calcium in Powdered Milk via
X-ray Fluorescence Using External Standard and Standard Addition Based
Methods. J. Chem. Educ. 2013, 90 (9), 1218–1221.
34. Barakat, A.; Maurice, S.; Roberts, C.; Benvenuto, M. A.; Roberts-Kirchhoff,
E. S. Analysis of Salts and Salt Substitutes with a Handheld X-Ray
Fluorescence Analyzer. In Trace Materials in Air, Soil, and Water; Evans,
K. R.; Benvenuto, M. A.; Lanigan, K. C.; Rihana, A.; Roberts-Kirchhoff,
E. S., Eds.; ACS Symposium Series 1210; American Chemical Society:
Washington, DC, 2015, pp 101−114.
35. Shroeder, A. E., Smith, Z. R., Benvenuto, M. A., Roberts-Kirchhoff, E. S.
Analysis of Dietary Supplements with a Handheld XRF Analyzer. In Food,
Energy, and Water: The Chemistry Connection; Ahuja, S., Ed.; Elsevier, Inc:
Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2015; pp 383−390.
36. XRF Research. X-ray Fluorescence. https://www.xrfresearch.com/
technology/x-ray-fluorescence (accessed April 2015).
37. Geochemical Instrumentation and Analysis. X-ray Fluorescence
Instrumentation. http://serc.carleton.edu/research_education/
geochemsheets/techniques/XRF.html (accessed April 2017).
38. X-Ray Fluorescence: Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis. http://
oxford-labs.com/x-ray-fluorescence/qualitative-and-quantitative-analysis/
(accessed July 2017).
39. Wise, S. A.; Watters, R. L. Certificate of Analysis SRM® 2586 Trace Elements
in Soil Containing Lead from Paint (Nominal 3000 mg/kg Lead); National
Institute of Standards & Technology: Gaithersburg, MD, 2008.
40. Wise, S. A.; Watters, R. L. Certificate of Analysis SRM® 2709a San Joaquin
Soil; National Institute of Standards & Technology: Gaithersburg, MD, 2009.
41. Wise, S. A.; Watters, R. L. Certificate of Analysis SRM® 2711a Montana II
Soil; National Institute of Standards & Technology: Gaithersburg, MD, 2009.
42. S1 TITAN 600-800 Soil Calibration; Bruker Elemental: Kennewick, WA,
February 2014.
43. Benvenuto, M. A. Industrial Chemistry; DeGruyter: Berlin, 2014.
44. Lewicka, Z. A.; Benedetto, A. F.; Benoit, D. N.; William, W. Y.; Fortner, J.
D.; Colvin, V. L. The structure, composition, and dimensions of TiO2 and
ZnO nanomaterials in commercial sunscreens. J. Nanopart. Res. 2011, 13
(9), 3607–3617.
45. Code of Federal Regulations Title 21. Manganese Violet.
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/
CFRSearch.cfm?fr=73.2775 (accessed December 2017).
103
Chapter 8
107
The difficulty with a study like Dewailly et al. (3) was how to address the
contamination issue with the local community where it was found. How does one
report a high level of PCB contamination in human breast milk to a population
which has no industry, may not have any PCB sources in the community, and not
know – or even not care – what PCBs are? After all, nobody can see environmental
chemical contaminants in most cases, so how does one convince anybody that they
really are present?
110
over about 90 minutes from beginning to end (not shown). Following this, the daily
cycle was once again observed. The cause of this event is unknown but assumed to
be associated with power plant emissions. Including the extreme event, the range
of values in Longyearbyen is 1.0 to 42 ng m-3. Without including the extreme
values on 9 May, the third major result is the average value of 2.7 ng m-3 (+/- 0.87,
n = 1131), between 70% and greater than 100% more than the average Arctic
background amounts that range from 1.23 to 1.56 ng m-3 (5–8, 16).
The Longyearbyen power plant, which we assume is the source of the high
average and daily cycle of Hg0(g), began operating in 1983. It is a 10 MW plant
that burns about 25 000 MT of bituminous coal per year (2015) taken from Mine 7,
about 12 km east from the plant. This coal has a high pyrite (FeS2) content, which
is known to be contaminated with HgS (11, 12), noted above. As far as we know,
FeS2 is not washed from Mine 7 bituminous coal, so associated Hg becomes part
of the combustion residue. In general, older coal combustion systems, like the one
in Longyearbyen, cannot be adapted to operate with washed coal (13).
112
High values of Hg0(g) have been observed in the emissions of bituminous coal
plants in China, and those emissions have been highly correlated with the amounts
of mercury found in the coal that is burned (9).
In December 2015, the Longyearbyen plant was required to install air
pollution control devices (APCD) to reduce emissions of NOx, particles, and
SO2. Other monitored emissions included CO2, O2, temperature, and airflow (m3
per hour) (22). The first step in the APCD process treats NOx using urea. This
is followed by an electrostatic precipitator to remove particles. The third step is
wet flue gas desulfurization (FGD) using sea water. Most wet FGD processes in
coal combustion systems employ a limestone-gypsum system (13, 23, 24), but
the cost of this would likely be prohibitive in Longyearbyen because there is no
local limestone source, while sea water is plentiful and free.
In the FGD step using sea water, reaction of dissolved SO2 with H2O will first
produce SO32-(aq) because the S in both SO2 and SO32-(aq) has the same oxidation
state (4+). Protons resulting from this reaction are neutralized by natural seawater
alkalinity (23). The SO32-(aq) will react readily with Hg2+(aq) either from the flue
gas (including pyrite residues) or seawater itself, with S contributing unshared
electrons to form Hg0(g) which will move to the atmosphere after a series of
intermediate reactions (14, 15).
The process of chemical reduction of Hg2+(aq) by SO32-(aq) has been observed at
coal-fired power plants using sea water FGD in China (10, 25). The result is high
Hg0(g) concentrations ranging up to 13.5 ng m-3, approximately 8 times greater
than the global average, above the aeration ponds where FGD takes place or at
discharge points of FGD water back in to the ocean.
Combustion literature also suggests that Hg0(g) emissions from coal
combustion may result from SO32-(aq) added for deoxygenation to prevent
corrosion in the combustion system (26). Again, SO32-(aq) will reduce Hg2+(aq) to
Hg0(g), especially at high temperatures (14, 15).
This short Hg0(g) sampling campaign from Longyearbyen clearly shows the
presence of both high emissions and daily trends of Hg0(g) in an Arctic settlement
relying on coal combustion for local energy. The local and regional impacts of
these emissions have not been studied. However, Dastoor and Durnford (27) noted
that Hg0(g) concentrations at the Zeppelin Observatory in Ny-Ålesund (Figure 1)
in 2007-2008 were 1.6 – 1.7 ng m-3, and significantly higher than at Alert, in the
far northern Canadian Arctic, from 2005 – 2009 (1.4 - 1.6 ng m-3). They attributed
this higher concentration to seawater emissions from the West Spitsbergen Current
near Svalbard that originated near North America (and possible industrial mercury
sources) with the Gulf Stream. The higher concentrations at Zeppelin than at both
Station Nord and Alert were also noted by Angot et al. (5) and were attributed to
the fact that Zeppelin during summer is surrounded by open water – presumably
emitting Hg0(g), while Station Nord and Alert are surrounded by multi-year sea
ice during most years, preventing emissions from surface water. Hirdman et al.
(28) attribute peak Hg0(g) concentrations at Zeppelin during winter to transport of
comparatively contaminated air masses from Europe. An additional consideration,
based on our results, is that the source in Longyearbyen may contribute to higher
Hg0(g) at Zeppelin which is 114 km NW (downwind) from Longyearbyen (29).
113
Documentation of the effects of this Arctic coal-burning site on Hg0(g)
concentrations and distribution in the eastern Arctic is needed, along with
on-going measurements to observe seasonal and long-term concentration changes.
115
ΣOPE concentration of 426 ± 57 pg/m3. The non-chlorinated tri-n-butyl phosphate
(TnBP) and 2-ethylhexyl-diphenyl phosphate (EHDPP) were the most abundant
OPE congeners measured and were detected in all the samples at concentrations
ranging from 5.6 to 1000 pg/m3 for TnBP and 6 to 300 pg/m3 for EHDPP.
Mean tris(butoxyethyl) phosphate (TBEP) concentrations were statistically
indistinguishable from the TnBP and EHDPP concentrations, but TBEP was
detected only in ~25% of the samples with the concentrations ranging from 47
to 210 pg /m3. In addition, triphenyl phosphate (TPP) and tris(2-ethylhexyl)
phosphate (TEHP) were detected in all samples, but at lower concentrations
ranging from 1 to 52 pg/m3 and 1 to 42 pg m-3, respectively. Overall, the sum of
all non-chlorinated OPE concentrations was ~75% of the ΣOPE concentrations.
The sum of the three chlorinated OPEs, TCEP, TCPP, and TDCPP, was only ~25
% of the ΣOPE concentrations. The most abundant chlorinated OPE was TCPP,
which was detected in all samples with the concentrations ranging from 10 to
190 pg m-3. Average TDCPP concentrations were statistically not distinguishable
from the average TCPP concentrations, but this OPE was detected only in ~20%
of the samples at concentrations ranging from 2 to 290 pg/m3. Finally, TCEP
concentrations were the lowest among the levels of the chlorinated OPEs and
ranged from 4 to 63 pg/m3.
There are only two studies that have measured atmospheric OPE
concentrations in the Arctic environment: ΣOPE concentrations of ~120–1100
pg/m3 were reported in three particle phase samples collected at Ny-Ålesund,
and over the Arctic Ocean the reported ΣOPE concentrations ranged from 237
to 1270 pg/m3 in particle samples. Interestingly, both of these studies reported
that chlorinated OPEs dominated the ΣOPE concentration, which is different
from our findings. The OPE profile found in our samples agrees with the ΣOPEs
profiles measured at North American remote sites, where the non-chlorinated
OPEs, TnBP, TBEP and TPP, were found to comprise up to 85% of the ΣOPE
concentrations. Overall, our data, like that in the literature, clearly show that
OPEs are widely present in the atmosphere at remote regions throughout the
world, including polar regions. It has been shown that particle-bound OPEs
are persistent in the atmosphere with regard to OH. oxidation, with estimated
atmospheric lifetimes ranging from ~6 days for non-chlorinated OPEs to ~14 days
for TDCPP. Longer atmospheric lifetimes suggest that OPEs can undergo LRAT.
Along with the OPEs, we measured many BFRs and Dechlorane Plus (DP)
to compare to the OPE concentrations. Figure 4B shows the concentrations
of total BFRs (ΣBFRs, the sum of 34 PBDE congeners, tetrabromo-p-xylene
(pTBX), pentabromo-benzene (PBBz), pentabromoethylbenzene (PBEB),
hexabromo-benzene (HBB), 2-ethylhexyl-2,3,4,5-tetra-bromobenzoate (TBB),
bis(2-ethylhexyl)-tetrabromophthalate (TBPH), 1,2-bis(2,4,6-tribromo-
phenoxy)ethane (BTBPE), and decabromodiphenyl-ethane (DBDPE)), total
PBDEs (ΣPBDEs, the sum of 34 PBDE), BDE-47, 99, 209, pTBX, PBBz, HBB,
PBEB, and DP (the sum of the syn- and anti-DP). ΣBFR concentrations were in
the range of 3–77 pg/m3, with the average concentration of 16 ± 2.7 pg/m3. TBB
and TBPH were the dominant non-PBDE BFRs measured in these samples and
comprised ~46% and 17% of ΣBFR concentrations, respectively. TBB and TBPH
concentrations varied from 0.2 to 58 pg/m3 and 0.3 to 14 pg/m3, respectively and
116
were higher than concentrations previously reported for atmospheric vapor-phase
samples collected in the Canadian and European Arctic and over the Arctic Ocean
in 2006–2010. TBB and TBPH are major components of Firemaster 550, and
the presence of relatively higher concentrations in our Longyearbyen samples
could be related to a recent increase in the use of Firemaster 550. One way to
identify Firemaster as a parent product from observed concentrations is a ratio of
TBB to TBB+TBPH concentrations. We know that this ratio in the commercial
Firemaster 550 mixture was 0.77 ± 0.03. In this study, the ratio averaged 0.65
± 0.02, which is close enough to the Firemaster value to suggest that TBB and
TBPH measured in Longyearbyen may be related Firemaster 550 emissions to
the atmosphere.
Figure 4. (A) Concentrations (pg/m3) of OPEs and (B) BFRs and ΣDP in the
atmospheric particle phase at Longyearbyen, Svalbard. The black horizontal
line inside each box represents the median. The boxes represent the 25th and
75th percentiles. Error bars represent 5th and 95th percentiles. Note that the
concentrations scale is 10 times greater for panel A than for panel B. Reprinted
with permission from Salamova et al. (33) Copyright 2014, American Chemical
Society.
117
ΣPBDE concentrations were ~37% of ΣBFR on average, and ranged from 1.0
to 31 pg/m3. The most abundant PBDE congener was BDE-209, which contributed
24% to ΣPBDE concentrations and was in the 0.1-6.7 pg/m3 concentration range.
The common penta-congeners, BDE-47 and BDE-99, were the second and third
most abundant PBDEs and contributed on average ~15% and ~12% to the ΣPBDE
concentrations. These PBDE concentrations generally agree with those previously
measured at Ny-Ålesund on Svalbard.
DBDPE and BTBPE were detected in most of these samples,but at lower
concentrations (0.04-2.2 pg/m3 and 0.01-0.09 pg/m3, respectively). Among the
bromobenzenes, HBB was detected in all samples with the concentrations ranging
from 0.01 to 1.7 pg/m3. PBEB, pTBX, and PBBz were detected in ~70% of the
samples with average concentrations lower than the HBB concentrations.
Finally, DP was also detected in all of the samples, and ΣDP concentrations
ranged from 0.05 to 5.0 pg/m3. The fractional abundance of anti-DP defined as a
fraction of anti-DP in ΣDP varied from 43-90%, with the mean value of 75 ± 2%,
which is consistent with the previously reported composition of the commercial
DP mixture.
Since OPEs are potential replacements for the discontinued PBDEs, we
compared ΣOPE, total chlorinated OPE (ΣCl-OPEs), and total non-chlorinated
OPE (Σnon-Cl-OPEs) concentrations with ΣBFR concentrations, as well
as with the most abundant BFRs (TBB, TBPH, and ΣPBDEs) measured in
the same samples (see Figure 5A). Overall, ΣOPE, ΣCl-OPE, Σnon-Cl-OPE
concentrations are ~150, 100, and 35 times higher (on average) than the BFR
concentrations, respectively (see Figure 5B). In other words, atmospheric OPE
concentrations measured are 1-2 orders of magnitude higher than corresponding
BFR concentrations, which is consistent with the OPE-BFR ratios found for the
North American Great Lakes basin and oceanic air over the Northern Pacific.
In fact, OPE concentrations measured in this study are 1-2 orders of magnitude
higher than any BFR (specifically, PBDE) concentrations historically measured in
the Arctic atmosphere, even those measured during the active PBDE production
period. Figure 6 shows literature data on PBDE concentrations measured at
various Arctic sites since the 1990s. With the exception of two high values found
at Alert and Tagish in 1994/1995, which were attributed to local waste incineration
sources and here assumed to be outliers, all of the previously measured ΣPBDE
concentrations are within 1-10 pg/m3, while OPE concentrations measured in this
study are generally between 10-1000 pg/m3.
Summary
The results from the Arctic studies and experiences we have discussed
demonstrate how small towns have been used as environmental chemistry
laboratories, where contaminant levels of mercury and organic contaminants,
from combustion, diffuse local emissions, or LRAT, are significantly affecting
environmental quality at the local level. In the case of mercury emissions from
coal combustion, the results show not only the importance of environmental
chemistry, but a significant bit of combustion and pollution control chemistry,
118
which will impress upon students the need to use a very broad approach when
attempting to understand the sources and processes involved in environmental
chemistry. Not all of the experiences, results or processes we have presented are
unique to the Arctic, but the fact that they are found there shows that the Arctic,
while far away in the experiences or even imaginations of most environmental
chemists, is part of the integrated world. The benefit to students is that the
outcomes of these research investigations can be taken anywhere in the world
with a broader understanding of the different processes affecting environmental
chemistry, and that even the remote parts of the world are not off-limits to the
effects of human processes.
119
Figure 6. Atmospheric concentrations (pg/m3) of ΣOPEs (purple, rightmost bar)
in Longyearbyen, Svalbard and historic ΣPBDEs (blue bars; gas phase, the sum
of di- to hepta-PBDE congener concentrations) measured at various Arctic sites
worldwide. See reference (33) for information on literature references of data
shown. Reprinted with permission from Salamova et al. (33) Copyright 2014,
American Chemical Society.
The results that we have presented, while showing examples of the effects
of human activity in the Arctic, are not known to be harmful to organisms in
the environment. The Hg0(g) concentrations are below the no-effect reference
concentrations, and the FRs do not have established reference concentrations in
air. While there are mechanisms producing or moving these toxic substances in
and to Longyearbyen, the immediate risk to the environment is low. However, for
a region with very few if any sources of these contaminants, the need to understand
the fates and effects, and in some cases the sources of these pollutants remains a
challenge for the environmental chemist.
120
Acknowledgments
The research results reported here include experiences by both authors
as professor (MHH) and student (SLC) at the University Center on Svalbard.
The access to sampling opportunities resulting from courses AT-210 (Arctic
Environmental Pollution) and AT-331 (Arctic Environmental Pollution:
Atmospheric Distribution and Processes) are gratefully acknowledged. The
sampling instrument producing mercury data was supplied by Michelle Nerentorp
Mastromonaco, Chalmers Technical Univeristy, Götborg, Sweden. The section of
this chapter on flame retardants is adapted from Salamova et al. (33)
References
1. Shaw, G. E. The Arctic Haze phenomenon. Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc.
1995, 76, 2403–2413.
2. Murozumi, M.; Chow, T. J.; Patterson, C. Chemical concentrations of
pollutant lead aerosols, terrestrial dusts and sea salts in Greenland and
Antarctic snow strata. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 1969, 33, 1247–1294.
3. Dewailly, E.; Nantel, A.; Weber, J. P.; Meyer, F. High levels of PCBs in breast
milk of Inuit women from Arctic Quebec. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol.
1989, 43 (5), 641–6.
4. Muir, D. C. G.; Norstrom, R. J.; Simon, M. Organochlorine contaminants
in Arctic marine food chains: Accumulation of specific polychlorinated
biphenyls and chlordane-related compounds. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1988,
22, 1071–1079, DOI: 10.1021/es00174a012.
5. Angot, H.; Dastoor, A.; DeSimone, F.; Gårdfeldt, K.; Genarelli, C.
N.; Hedgecock, I. M.; Langer, S.; Magand, O.; Mastromonaco, M.
N.; Nordstrøm, C.; Pfaffhuber, K. A.; Pirrone, N.; Ryjkov, A.;
Selin, N. E.; Skov, H.; Song, S.; Sprovieri, F.; Steffen, A.; Toyota, K.;
Travnikov, O.; Yang, X.; Dommergue, A. Chemical cycling and deposition
of atmospheric mercury in polar regions: review of recent measurements
and comparison with models. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2016, 16, 10735–10763,
DOI:10.5194/acp-16-10735-2016.
6. Steen, A. O.; Berg, T.; Dastoor, A. P.; Durnford, D. A.; Engelsen, O.; Hole, L.
R.; Pfaffhuber, K. A. Natural and anthropogenic atmospheric mercury in the
European Arctic: a fractionation study. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2011, 11,
6273–6284, DOI: 10.5194/acp-11-6273-2011.
7. Steffen, A.; Bottenheim, J.; Cole, A.; Ebinghaus, R.; Lawdon, G.; Leaitch, W.
R. Atmospheric mercury speciation and mercury in snow over time at Alert,
Canada. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2014, 14, 2219–2231, DOI: 10.5194/acp-14-
2219-2014.
8. Sprovieri, F.; Pirrone, N.; Ebinghaus, R.; Kock, H.; Dommergue, A. A review
of worldwide atmospheric mercury measurements. Atmos. Chem. Phys.
2010, 10, 8245–8265, DOI: 10.5194/acp-10-8245-2010.
9. Wang, S. X.; Zhang, L.; Li, G. H.; Wu, Y.; Hao, J. M.; Pirrone, N.;
Sprovieri, F.; Ancora, M. P. Mercury emission and speciation of coal-fired
121
power plants in China. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2010, 10, 1183–1192, DOI:
10.5194/acp-10-1183-2010.
10. Liu, X.; Sun, L.; Yuan, D.; Yin, L.; Chen, J.; Liu, Y.; Liu, C.; Liang, Y.;
Lin, F. Mercury distribution in seawater discharged from a coal-fired power
plant equipped with a seawater flue gas desulfurization system. Environ. Sci.
Pollut. Res. 2011, 18, 1324–1332, DOI: 10.007/s11356-011-0486-4.
11. Toole-O’Neil, B.; Tewalt, S.; Finkelman, R.; Akers, D. Mercury
concentrations in coal - unraveling the puzzle. Fuel 1999, 78, 47–54.
12. Yudovich, Y. E.; Ketris, M. P. Mercury in coal: a review: Part 1.
Geochemistry. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2005, 62, 107–134.
13. Wang, S.; Zhang, L.; Zhao, B.; Meng, Y.; Hao, J. Mitigation potential of
mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants in China. Energy Fuels
2012, 26, 4635–4642, DOI: 10.1021/ef201990x.
14. Munthe, J.; Xiao, F.; Lindqvist, O. The aqueous reduction of divalent
mercury by sulfite. Water Air Soil Pollut. 1991, 56, 621–630, DOI:
10.1007/BF00342304.
15. Heidel, B.; Klein, B. Reemission of elemental mercury and mercury halides
in wet flue gas desulfurization. Int. J. Coal Geol. 2017, 170, 28–34, DOI:
10.1016/j.coal.2016.09.003.
16. Yu, J.; Xie, Z.; Kang, H.; Li, Z.; Sun, C.; Bian, L.; Zhang, P. High variability
of atmospheric mercury in the summertime boundary layer through the
central Arctic Ocean. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 6091, DOI: 10.1038/srep06091.
17. Cole, A. S.; Steffen, A. Trends in long-term gaseous mercury observations
in the Arctic and effects of temperature and other atmospheric conditions.
Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2010, 10, 4661–4672, DOI: 10.5194/acp-10-4661-
2010.
18. Lee, D. S.; Dollard, G. J.; Pepler, S. Gas-phase mercury in the atmosphere of
the United Kingdom. Atmos. Environ. 1998, 32, 855–864.
19. Ebinghaus, R.; Kock, H. H.; Jennings, S. G.; McCartin, P.; Orren, M. J.
Measurements of atmospheric mercury concentrations in northwestern and
central Europe – Comparison of experimental data and model results. Atmos.
Environ. 1995, 29, 3333–3344.
20. Liu, B.; Keeler, G. J.; Dvonch, T.; Barres, J. A.; Lynam, M. M.;
Marsik, F. J.; Morgan, J. T. Urban-rural differences in atmospheric
mercury speciation. Atmos. Environ. 2010, 44, 2013–2023, DOI:
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.02.012.
21. Manolopolous, H.; Snyder, D.; Schauer, J. J.; Hill, J. S.; Turner, J. R.;
Olson, M. L.; Krabbenhoft, D. P. Sources of speciated atmospheric mercury
at a residential neighborhood impacted by industrial sources. Environ. Sci.
Technol. 2007, 41, 5626–5633, DOI: 10.1021/es0700348.
22. Longyearbyen Lokalstyre. http://www.lokalstyre.no/
energiverket.247428.no.html (accessed November 10, 2016).
23. Srivastava, R. K.; W. Jozewicz, W. Flue Gas Desulfurization: The State of
the Art. J. Air Waste Mgmt. 2001, 51, 1676–1688.
24. Vidal Barrero., F.; Ollero, P.; Gutiérrez Ortiz, F. J.; Arona, R. Catalytic
oxidation of S(IV) in seawater slurries of activated carbon. Environ. Sci.
Technol. 2005, 39, 5031–5036, DOI: 10.1021/es048929x.
122
25. Sun, L.; Feng, L.; Yuan, D.; Lin, S.; Huang, S.; Gao, L.; Zhu, Y. The extent
of the influence and flux estimation of volatile mercury from the aeration
pool in a typical coal-fired power plant equipped with a seawater glue gas
desulfurization system. Sci. Total Environ. 2013, 444, 559–564, DOI:
10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.11.101.
26. Cotton, I. J. Oxygen scavengers – the chemistry of sulfite under hydrothermal
conditions. Mater. Perf. 1987, 26, 41–48.
27. Dastoor, A. P.; Durnford, D. A. Arctic ocean: Is it sink or a source of
atmospheric mercury? Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 48, 1707–1717, DOI:
10.1021/es404473e.
28. Hirdman, D.; Aspmo, K.; Burkhart, J. F.; Eckhardt, S.; Sodermann, H.;
Stohl, A. Transport of mercury in the Arctic atmosphere: Evidence for a
spring-time net sink and summer-time source. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2009,
36, L12814, DOI: 10.1029/2009GL038345.
29. Windfinder, 2017. https://www.windfinder.com/windstatistics/
longyearbyen_spitsbergen (accessed September 2, 2017).
30. Drinker, C.; Warren, M. F.; Bennett, G. A. The problem of possible systemic
effects from certain chlorinated hydrocarbons. J. Ind. Hyg. Toxicol. 1937,
19, 283–311.
31. Danielson, J. A. Air Pollution Control Manual. U.S. Public Health Service,
National Center for Air Pollution Control, 1967.
32. Jutze, G. A.; Foster, K. E. Recommended method for atmospheric sampling
of fine particulate matter by filter media-high-volume sampler. J. Air Pollut.
Control Assoc. 1967, 17, 17–25.
33. Salamova, A.; Hermanson, M. H.; Hites, R. A. Organophosphate and
halogenated flame retardants in atmospheric particles from a European Arctic
site. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 6133–6140, DOI: 10.1021/es500911d.
34. Hermanson, M. H.; Isaksson, E.; Forström, S.; Teixeira, C.; Muir, D. C. G.;
Pohjola, V.; van de Wal, R. Deposition history of brominated flame retardant
compounds to an ice core from Holtedahlfonna, Svalbard, Norway. Environ.
Sci. Technol. 2010, 44, 7405–7410, DOI: 10.1021/es1016608.
123
Chapter 9
Introduction
The federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) defines brownfields
as “abandoned, idled, or underused industrial and commercial facilities where
expansion or redevelopment is complicated by a real or perceived environmental
contamination” (1). Brownfields differ in many aspects, such as location, size,
Brownfields in Michigan
126
Figure 1. Brownfields in Michigan. (see color insert)
127
Table 1. (Continued). Brownfields in Michigan by contaminants (4–6)
Typical Activity Typical Contaminants County Number of
Found Brownfields
Polynuclear aromatic
Coal gasification Monroe 1
hydrocarbons (PAH)
Volatile organic compounds Wayne 1
(VOCs) such as chloroform
Dry cleaning and tetrachloroethane;
various solvents; spot Ionia 1
removers; fluorocarbon 113
Dioxin; various municipal
Incinerators Wayne 2
and industrial waste
Oakland 4
Metals; VOCs; Monroe 2
polychlorinated biphenyl
(PCB); ammonia; methane; Newaygo 1
Landfills
household products and Macomb 1
cleaners; pesticides;
various wastes Wayne 1
Lenawee 1
Macomb 5
Wayne 2
Oakland 2
Shiawassee 1
Jackson 1
Machine Metals; VOCs; dioxin;
shops/metal beryllium; degreasing Bay 1
fabrication agents; solvents; waste oils
Ionia 1
Kent 1
Hillsdale 1
Lenawee 1
Clinton 1
Kalamazoo 1
Polymers; phthalates;
Plastics
cadmium; solvents; resins; Shiawassee 1
manufacturing
chemical additives; VOCs
Jackson 1
Pharmaceutical Lead; various organic
Wayne 1
manufacturing chemicals; organic solvents
Silver; solvents; acids; Oakland 1
Printing industry waste oils; inks; and dyes;
photographic chemicals Monroe 1
Continued on next page.
128
Table 1. (Continued). Brownfields in Michigan by contaminants (4–6)
Typical Activity Typical Contaminants County Number of
Found Brownfields
Scrap metal Various metals (such as lead
Oakland 1
operations and nickel); PCBs; dioxin
Wayne 8
Brownfields in Detroit
The city of Detroit is steeped in history. Its industrial boom erupted in
the early part of the twentieth century with the advent of the automobile. The
automotive industry allowed the city to grow exponentially in a very short period
of time. Production boomed, jobs were abundant, thousands of homes were
built for workers, and the city grew and flourished (7). However, with better
technology, the industry began to replace and refine the workforce. Jobs once
numerous began to wane. Socioeconomic issues came to a head in 1967 when the
great race riots of Detroit raged for five days. Half-burned houses, empty factories,
and vacant land soon peppered the city’s landscape. About 30% of Detroit is now
vacant land, which accounts for about 40 square miles of the city’s total 138.77
square mile area. The city’s population has shrunken from a peak of 2 million in
the early 1950s to 900,000 today (8). With all of these dilapidated buildings and
decaying factories come several environmental problems. When most of these
buildings were erected, environmental regulations, building codes, acceptable
building materials and storage regulations were different from today’s standards.
Before codes, buildings might have been structurally unsafe and unsanitary and
emergency exits might have been inadequate. Building codes were developed
following disastrous situations to address societal concerns about public health
and safety by setting minimum requirements for building design, construction
and operation to protect the public and natural resources. For example,
current constructions must meet seismic design standards, flood-protection
and wind-bracing requirements (9). In earlier construction projects, builders
used asbestos for insulation due to its resistance to heat and fire. Before 1978,
paint and gasoline contained lead. Leaking underground storage tanks (LUST)
threatened to pollute groundwater with lead and gasoline. When improperly
129
utilized or disposed of, asbestos, lead and petroleum compounds present many
environmental challenges that contribute to the formation of browfields.
Primarily used for its natural fire-retardant properties, asbestos was used in
many applications, including insulation for pipes and furnaces, floor and ceiling
tiles, and textured paints. However, anytime asbestos is disturbed by sanding,
remodeling, or demolition, asbestos particles if inhaled can cause asbestosis and
eventually lead to lung cancer and mesothelioma (10). Lead contamination also
poses serious problems, particularly in Detroit. It can be found in houses built
before lead-based paint was banned in 1978, which includes almost 90% of all
low-income Detroit housing (11), and in soil contaminated by air deposition of
lead particles emitted before leaded gasoline was phased out. Digestion of lead
paint chips and inhalation of lead dust can cause lead poisoning (12). Finally,
petroleum contaminantion can arise from modern gasoline stations that use
underground storage tanks (UST) to store fuel products. When gasoline stations
are abandoned due to financial failure, these UST remain buried underneath the
stations and can begin leaking over time. Leakage can be caused by malfunction
or corrosion of the tanks, UST fill manholes, supply pipes, or dispensing pumps
(13). The release of a fuel product can contaminate surrounding soil, groundwater
and even surface water (14). Determining the source, extent and nature of the
release is crucial in containing and cleaning the spill.
130
Since Detroit has the most brownfield sites of all cities in Michigan, the focus
was on locating brownfields contaminated with these three chemicals within the
city limits. From old gas stations to abandoned factories to vacant commercial
properties, these buildings are not only eyesores to the community but also health
hazards to those living near them. A total of 27 properties contaminated with
either lead, asbestos or petroleum chemicals were identified through the help of the
Department of Environmental Affairs for the city of Detroit (15). This department,
in collaboration with the US EPA and Michigan DEQ, formed the Redevelopment
of Urban Sites (REUS) committee to address current and future issues related to
brownfield sites as well as initiatives associated with environmental and economic
redevelopment. The 27 properties then were mapped using GIS; the result is shown
in Figure 2. Finally, students researched EPA recommendations for site cleanup.
Brownfield Remediation
The process of remediating a site contaminated by hazardous substances can
be complicated. Depending on the extent and nature of the contamination, the
remediation process can be costly and time-consuming. The EPA, in conjunction
with the State Response and Brownfield Program Operations Task Force, provides
a 3-step approach to brownfield remediation (16).
Step 1 is a basic assessment of the site, which is a two-phase process. The
first phase is establishing the probability of contamination. The second phase is
determining the planned future use of the site.
Step 2, which establishes which contaminants are actually present, also is a
two-phase process. The first phase requires a survey of the site and a review of all
historical records regarding past use and operations of the site. The second phase
involves collecting and analyzing soil, air and water samples, and estimating the
amount of contaminant and potential effects on public health.
Step 3 is cleaning up the site. The type of clean-up varies widely based on the
type and amount of contamination. Removal and treatment of contaminated soil
and groundwater are the most common approaches.
Conclusions
This paper describes a classroom project that aims to identify certain
industrial operations that cause site contamination in the state of Michigan.
These sites are known as brownfields. Once tabulated by county, these sites
then were mapped using the GIS software. Wayne county, home to the city of
Detroit, had the largest number of brownfields. Students then selected three
contaminants—asbestos, lead and petroleum—that are among the top three most
common contaminants found in Detroit brownfields. Twenty-seven properties in
Detroit were identified as contaminated by asbestos, lead and/or petroleum. The
mapping of the properties by the GIS software was reported in the paper. Locating
brownfields in their communities motivated students to research solutions for site
cleanup. The three steps of brownfield remediation recommended by the EPA
were identified. Overall, brownfield redevelopment poses challenges to major
131
cities like Detroit. Although it carries financial burden, it has enormous potential
to bring environmental, economic, and social benefits to the city.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge the help of the students who put
forth effort and energy into this work. The authors would like to thank Yan J.,
McCutcheon K., and Hancock C. for their contribution and assistance with the
data for this research project.
References
1. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Brownfields. https://www.epa.gov/
brownfields (accessed on November 19, 2016)
2. Fischer, T.; Rosenberg, B.; Kchao, V.; Sheahan, J. Detroit Hosts
EPA Brownfields 2008 Conference. http://www.usmayors.org/
usmayornewspaper/documents/05_19_08 (accessed October 11, 2016)
3. Brachman, L. Turning brownfields into community assets: Barriers to
redevelopment. In Recycling the city: The use and reuse of urban land.
Greenstein, R., Sungu-Eryilmaz. Y. Eds; Lincoln Institute of Land Policy:
Cambridge, MA, 2004, 67-88.
4. Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. A MDEQ Report on the:
Environmental Protection Bond Fund Cleanup and Redevelopment Fund
Clean Michigan Initiative Bond Fund. https://www.nrc.gov/docs/ML1126/
ML112620577.pdf (accessed October 1, 2016)
5. Michigan Department of Environmental Quality. Inventory on Facilites.
https://secure1.state.mi.us/facilitiesinventoryqueries/ (accessed October 5,
2016)
6. Contaminated Site Clean-Up Information (CLU-IN). Brownfields. https://
clu-in.org/cihandbook/CIOCpage/brown.htm (accessed on October 8, 2016)
7. Hyde, C. K. Detroit the Dynamic: The Industrial History of
Detroit from Cigars to Cars. https://www.jstor.org/stable/20173894?
seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents (accessed December 10, 2017)
8. Gallagher, J. Acres of Barren Blocks Offer Chance to Reinvent Detroit.
Detroit Free Press. http://www.cityfarmer.info/2008/12/23/acres-of-barren-
blocks-offer-chance-to-reinvent-detroit/ (accessed December 19, 2017)
9. Environmental Energy and Study Institute (EESI): The Value and Impact of
Building Codes http://www.eesi.org/papers/view/the-value-and-impact-of-
building-codes (accessed March 24, 2018)
10. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Asbestos. http://www.epa.gov/iaq/
asbestos.html#Sources%20of%20Asbestos (accessed December 21, 2017)
11. Detroit Environmental Agenda. https://detroitenvironmentaljustice.org/wp-
content/uploads/2017/07/DETROIT-ENVIRONMENTAL-AGENDA.pdf
(accessed March 21, 2018)
12. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Lead. http://www.epa.gov/lead
(accessed December 21, 2017)
132
13. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Underground Storage Tank.
https://www.epa.gov/ust/leaking-underground-storage-tanks-corrective-
action-resources (accessed March 21, 2018)
14. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Basic Information on Petroleum
Brownfields. http://www.epa.gov/OUST/petroleumbrownfields/pbbasic.htm
(accessed December 21, 2017)
15. Brownfield Listings: The Redevelopment Marketplace. https://
brownfieldlistings.com/
16. Davis, T. S. Brownfields: A Comprehensive Guide to Redeveloping
Contaminated Property; American Bar Association, 2002; pp 354−356.
133
Editors’ Biographies
Elizabeth S. Roberts-Kirchhoff
Elizabeth Roberts-Kirchhoff received a B.S. in Chemistry from Texas A & M
University and a Ph.D. in Biological Chemistry from the University of Michigan.
After postdoctoral research at Wayne State University and The University of
Michigan, she joined the faculty at the University of Detroit Mercy in 1997.
Presently, Liz serves as Assistant Dean of Science in the College of Engineering
& Science at the University of Detroit Mercy.
Liz has taught courses in biochemistry, medicinal chemistry, and
environmental toxicology to science majors and general, organic, and
biochemistry to allied health majors. Liz has continued to develop and implement
innovative and evidenced-based teaching pedagogies in the classroom and
laboratory. This has included the development of modules in Process-oriented
Guided Inquiry Learning, the innovative use of technologies in the classroom, and
the implementation of project-based laboratories and course-based undergraduate
research experiences.
Her research focus on the analysis of metals and xenobiotics in food,
consumer products, and the waters of Southeastern Michigan contributes to the
growing body of knowledge about how we impact our environment and how our
environment impacts our health. Liz has interest in the analysis of metals and
xenobiotics including the X-ray fluorescence analysis of metals in food, dietary
supplements, and cosmetics, and the GC-MS and LC-MS analysis of pesticides
and pharmaceutical compounds in southeastern Michigan waterways.
Mark A. Benvenuto
Mark Benvenuto received his education at the Virginia Military Institute and
the University of Virginia (B.S. and Ph.D., respectively) and did a post-doctoral
fellowship at the Pennsylvania State University. He also served a four-year term
of service between his undergraduate and graduate education as a lieutenant in the
United States Army, spent mostly in Mannheim, West Germany.
He joined the University of Detroit Mercy as a faculty member in inorganic
chemistry in 1993 and has been department chair since 2001. Mark has taught
freshman-level chemistry to science and engineering students virtually every
semester since he has been at the University of Detroit Mercy and has been
voted the UDM Science Teacher of the Year by the students five times. He was
also awarded the Michigan College Science Teacher of the Year in 2003 by the
Michigan Science Teachers Association. He has been active in local and national
ACS activities for two decades and is a Class of 2015 ACS Fellow.
136
Indexes
Author Index
Baker, S., 67 Nguyen, G., 81
Benvenuto, M., ix, 81, 89 Pang, Y., 125
Bhagwagar, M., 81 Pothoof, J., 81
Ezeh, V., 57 Rihana-Abdallah, A., 125
Guerard, J., 1 Roberts-Kirchhoff, E., ix, 89
Hayes, S., 1 Stokes, D., 89
Hermanson, M., 105 Thomas, S., 89
Kahl, A., 49 Tinawi, S., 81
Le Cras, S., 105 Woodard, K., 21
Makki, S., 81 Young, L., 21
Ngo, T., 89 Zimmermann, K., 21
139
Subject Index
A course and project description, 59
discussion, 65
Arctic, environmental chemistry introduction, 57
conclusions, 15 National Emission Inventory, 58f
future work, 14 project implementation, 60
implementation questions at the beginning of project,
distance laboratory experiences, 9 60t
face-to-face or distance format, 7 project results, 61
lab manual and lab kit developed, 10f ammonia concentration, scatter plot
surface water and drinking water after removing the possible outlier
quality, paucity of data, 11 data point, 63f
tentative course schedule, 8t ammonia concentration, scatter plot
introduction for Aug 22nd-Oct 31st 2017, 62f
course-based undergraduate research, ammonia concentration, scatter plot
2 for fall 2017, 62f
distance learning, engagement average ammonia concentration, GIS
challenges, 3 plot, 63f
environmental chemistry, contextually
relevant framework, 2
rationale, 4 C
distance and on-campus modalities,
course, 5f
Community-based undergraduate research
faculty-guided research projects,
experimental methods, 29
theoretical framework, 6f
analyte PAHs, list, 32t
UAF, STEM core courses, 6
deployment characteristics for each
results, 12
site, 34t
course, formative and summative
each site, demographic data, 31t
evaluation, 13
EJSCREEN, 30
USPS, students, 13
non-invasive measures, PAS deployed
Arctic communities, 105
at site C, 33f
air in an arctic town, particle-associated
future goals, 43
flame retardants, 114
interdisciplinary community-based
OPEs, concentrations, 117f
research, influence, 40
atmospheric mercury, 108
EJ-CIP participation, results of student
chemical reduction, process, 113
survey, 42t
Longyearbyen, Daily Hg0(g)
PAH concentration, correlation plots,
concentration cycles, 111f
41f
Longyearbyen, hourly average air
introduction, 22
temperature, 112f
CIP program, 25
meterological variables, 110
employers that rated the described
svalbard map highlighting
skills, percentage, 24f
longyearbyen, 109f
interdisciplinary nature of the project,
introduction, 106
Venn diagram, 29f
summary, 118
interdisciplinary undergraduate
atmospheric concentrations, 120f
research, 26
atmospheric particle phase,
open access institution, experiential
concentrations, 119f
learning, 23
Atmospheric ammonia, trends
student population, demographic
assessment
distribution, 22t
response to survey 2, 64f
student deliverables, 34
survey 2, 64t
conclusion and future directions, 65
141
annual Georgia Gwinnett College Duckweed species, using DNA barcoding,
CREATE Symposium, 37 67
basic demographic information, 35 instructional perspective and
presentations and outreach, 36 conclusions, 75
undergraduates, preliminary data DNA sequencing, technology, 76
generated, 38 introduction, 68
PAHs, distribution, 40f atpF-atpH barcode sequences,
standard PAH mixture, maximum likelihood dendrogram,
chromatograms, 38f 75f
total PAH concentrations, 39f DNA extraction protocol, workflow,
Cosmetic mineral eyeshadows, analysis, 89 70f
conclusions, 100 duckweed, wild population, 70f
experimental methods, 91 homology search, example BLASTn
selected elements, detection limits, output, 74f
92t PCR conditions, 71
introduction, 90 2% agarose, example results, 72f
results and discussion, 92 Sanger sequencing product, four
aluminum, potassium and iron, channel chromatograph, 73f
concentration, 98f
lead, concentrations, 95t
manganese, concentration, 99f
strontium, concentrations, 94t
N
strontium and rubidium,
concentration, 97f Nitrogen-containing ligands, synthesis of a
strontium and rubidium novel series
concentrations, 93 conclusions, 85
titanium in the makeup samples, experimental section, 84
concentration, 99f ligand synthetic data, 84t
XRF, consumer mineral makeup metal-ligand complex formation, 85t
analyzed, 96t introduction, 81
zinc in the makeup samples, results and discussion, 82
concentration, 97f ligand synthesis, general route, 83f
shortest and longest ligand, 83f
D
R
Detroit community using GIS, mapping of
brownfield properties Remote sensing, undergraduate research
brownfield remediation, 131 experience, 49
conclusions, 131 conclusions, 54
Detroit, brownfields, 129 discussion, 54
brownfield sites, 130f introduction, 50
introduction, 125 methods, 51
Michigan, brownfields, 126 Coqui sensor on protoboard, 52f
brownfields, 127f REU experience, 53
brownfields, contaminants, 127t Riffle Arduino board, 52f
142