Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Social Efficiency
Part 1: Summary:
Curriculum ideology encompasses the beliefs about what schools should teach students
and why. The social efficiency ideology was launched by Franklin Bobbitt in 1913. It believes
that teachers should prepare students to become contributing members of society by training
them to develop skills that will efficiently meet the needs of society. It suggests that education is
something that prepares one for adult life which relies on their ability to perform specific
activities. Rather than simply filling students minds with information, this ideology believes that
the most useful knowledge is the capability to perform skills that will be more relevant to the
Students are viewed as workers, providing efforts to transform themselves, that should
obtain the required capabilities to function in life. Teachers are essentially in complete control as
they decide what the students are supposed to learn, as well as why and how they are going to
learn it. The change in behaviour that they are seeking is often based on a stimulus-response type
of learning experience where they allow the students repetitive practice to gain experience in that
particular skill.
The teacher’s instruction is guided by clearly defined behavioural objectives which are
explicitly designed by the curriculum. They are encouraged to ask/answer four questions when
creating their instructional programs. Those being; What educational purposes should the school
seek to attain? (what are the goals). What educational experiences can be provided that are likely
to attain these purposes? (what experiences will be included to attain these goals). How can these
have a cumulative effect and reinforce each other). How can we determine whether these
purposes are being attained? (what methods of evaluation can determine the degree of progress
Overview of lesson
100 – words – Concise and clear description
Begin with a runthrough of the goal of the lesson. Next the teacher demonstrates how they will reflect on an
experience they’ve had that activated an emotion and write a brief story about this experience that they will be
willing to share with the class (~10 mins). Students will then write their story (~10 mins), get into partners and
share (~10 mins). Reconvening, willing students can share in front of the class, finishing with a review of what
they took away from the class (~10 mins).
Students will be able to represent and explore their Express ideas and develop understanding
thoughts, emotions and experiences through
listening, speaking, reading and written work. - Express ideas through orally and written work
with a sense of fluency
- Develop an understanding of respect for others'
work by asking questions and talking to others.
Curriculum Ideology
Identify and give a brief description of the ideological lens this lesson is designed through. (Based on your
assigned Ideology Reading) Indicate how your lesson is designed to have students experience this
ideology.
100 – 150 words – Concise and clear description. Draw from your Summary
The Social Efficiency Ideology believes that teachers are to teach and educate children in order to prepare them
to be active individuals that meet the needs of society. Students are viewed as workers who are given skills in
school to function efficiently in life. This lesson plan uses this ideology as an influence by teaching the students
tangible communication skills in written and oral demonstration. It will help students gain a sense of empathy
by relating and listening to their peers' stories. Both of these skills are needed to be active and good citizens in
the world. This lesson also allows students to use experiences from their lives and appropriately reflect, portray
and develop an understanding of their emotions in that instance, as well as listen and relate to other individuals
Learning Resources / Material & Equipment used * book, manipulatives, online resources etc...
White Board
Papers or Notebooks
Vocabulary sheet
GOAL ** our goal is to get students to develop effective communication skills and have empathy towards one
another.
Starting at 9:00am
The lesson will begin with letting the students know the outcomes and purpose of this lesson by explaining that
- Goal is to be able to express thought and emotion
- Be able to relate to others and have a sense of empathy
- Express ideas, emotions and experiences orally and through written work.
Next
- Ask students to think about an experience (one they would be comfortable sharing) that made them feel
a particular way either happy, sad, stressed, nervous etc.
- Explain, yourself the teacher, a time where you experienced emotion
- Explain how that event made you feel, who was there, what caused this emotion, why they felt this way
etc.
At approximately 9:10am, ask students to get out their notebooks for a writers workshop, write 5-10 sentences
about this experience. (10min)
Beginning the body of the lesson at 9:10am, the teacher will allow the students to begin writing their story
about the experience they have had that provoked some sort of emotional response.
-They will be given ten minutes to write their story. This task will take place individually at their desks.
At 9:30am the teacher will gather the student’s attention back at their desks.
Once their attention has adjusted back to the teacher, the teacher will ask if there are any students willing to
share their stories in front of the class.
If there are any volunteers, one at a time, the students will stand up at their desks and share their story.
-Students will be advised to respectfully listen to the ones sharing.
-Once the student is finished sharing, the remainder of the class will be encouraged to vocally express
their engagement and reflection to those stories/emotions.
After sharing, the teacher will then prompt conversation from the students for feedback on what they have
learned/taken away from the lesson.
Conversation of the matter and the lesson will be completed by 9:40am.
Professional Reflections:
Develop at least two important critical questions for your peers, who view your video presentation, to
consider regarding the ideology and your lesson . Ask these questions in your presentation and use them
to guide your conferencing in Sept 30th class - When you go into break out rooms
Guiding Questions to consider when you formulation your important questions: What were challenges
We found it difficult to apply this ideology (social efficiency) to a lesson plan for younger grades than we
would expect it to be for older grades. In our opinion, many life skills would be considered too advanced or
difficult to grasp for elementary and would be more easily understood/taught at older ages.
-With that being said, do you agree that the goal of this lesson can be considered a valuable life skill,
and what other ‘life skills’ could be incorporated early in elementary?
This ideology influenced our lesson design as students sharing their own personal stories with multiple
members of the class may not be a typical or comfortable approach for some, however we thought it was
important that the students develop the ability to feel empathetic and relate to their peers.
-Are there any suggestions of other approaches that we could have used in order for the students to
understand another's feelings?
What might be some challenges that teachers will face in the classroom under this ideology?
In what way does the Social Efficiency ideology effect assessment and evaluation?
Pro’s Con’s
- Preparation for the future; Adult life - Comes off a little demanding, not
- All working towards same goal totally about the learning experience,
- Focuses on the greater good of society - Individuals needs can feel neglected
- Efficient in training individuals for the due to society's needs being the
skills they will need later on in adult priority
life. - The assumption that everyone is the
- Allows learners to prioritize and focus same and that everyone's goals are the
on necessary skills. same
- Potentially feels conforming
- Could be argued that it reduces
individuality and creativity in learning
Curriculum ideologies are sets of beliefs that people obtain about what education's main
purpose is. This includes what they should teach, how they should teach, and why they should
teach it. These beliefs, or theories if you will, provide rationale for curriculum decisions and
defend the driving forces behind that ideology. They are often stemmed from economic,
political, philosophical and social influences. Each ideology that we encountered through this
project has its own unique set of beliefs, with occasional overlap to one another. They all agree
with such things like students should learn to read and write, however, other views are not as
Each ideology has its own pros and cons as they each provide a foundation of learning
that might not be valued by all. They each have many possibilities as well as limitations. We
personally felt as though the ideal teaching/learning methods would involve aspects from each
ideology rather than strictly following an individual one. A limitation for most ideologies is that
with all of the knowledge of the different types of learners it is hard to implement just one
system for all. Students respond better/worse to different techniques and in order for them to
thrive they need to feel supported through many methods rather than restricted to one.
The Learner Centered ideology was rather intriguing as its primary focal point is on the
concerns of the individual. Going from focusing on the complete opposite in social efficiency
where society's needs are the priority this ideology and lesson plan stood out. In a branch of
learner centered learning, organic schools allow students to acquire knowledge when they are
developmentally ready and without pressure. This itself was both beneficial and concerning to
us. It allows individual students to grow at their own pace and this can build confidence and
independence. They discover themselves along the way and it is meant to cause less stress to the
the next. It may be difficult to continually accommodate and cater to multiple stages of growth in
a classroom. Due to its goal being to support the interests of individuals and for the student to
influences the teaching rather than the other way around. This leaves potential for students to not
obtain the knowledge that will beneficially help them in life. There could also be potential for a
selfish society to develop as individual’s needs and interests have been catered to for the
majority of their youth and this could lead to unrealistic expectations outside of school.
We found that the Scholar Academic Ideology was very similar to the Social Efficiency
ideology in that they both veer towards developing citizens that are fit and necessary for society.
This is beneficial because its intentions are to prepare students for the future so that they can be
However, this can potentially reduce aspects of individualism and creativity and it places the
requirements of society over those of the individual. In this ideology teaching is more
authoritative and provides more direct instruction rather than cooperative learning between
We felt as though these ideologies were not significantly easier/harder for lesson
planning than others. The academic scholar ideology would likely have a more narrow and less
varying curriculum to follow. With the point being to choose a discipline and become a scholar
in that regiment, the lessons would be to directly instruct that discipline's knowledge. However,
with that being said they all contain their own challenges in design.