Professional Documents
Culture Documents
15
14.2
14.4
14.6
14.8
15.2
15.4
15.6
0
1000000
2000000
3000000
4000000
5000000
6000000
2011-12 Q1
Q2 2011-12 Q1
Q3 Q2
2011-12 Q4 Q3
2012-13 Q1 2011-12 Q4 GDP India quarterly:
Q2 2012-13 Q1
Q3 Q2
2012-13 Q4 Q3
2013-14 Q1 2012-13 Q4
Q2 2013-14 Q1
2016-17 Q1 2016-17 Q1
Q2 Q2
Q3 Q3
We have taken quarterly data of India’s GDP, from 2012Q1 to 2020Q3.
2017-18 Q1
2017-18 Q1
Q2
Q2
Q3
Q3
2017-18 Q4
2017-18 Q4 2018-19 Q1
2018-19 Q1 Q2
Q2 Q3
Q3 2018-19 Q4
2018-19 Q4 2019-20 Q1
2019-20 Q1 Q2
Q2 Q3
Q3 2019-20 Q4
2019-20 Q4 2020-21 Q1
2020-21 Q1 Q2
As we can see from graph of Log of India GDP’s Quarterly data, that series is non-stationary, so we will
check stationarity at first difference.
0.2
0.1
2015-16 Q4
2016-17 Q1
Q2
Q2
Q3
2011-12 Q4
2012-13 Q1
Q2
Q3
2012-13 Q4
2013-14 Q1
Q2
Q3
2013-14Q4
2014-15 Q1
Q2
Q3
2014-15 Q4
2015-16 Q1
Q2
Q3
Q3
2016-17 Q4
2017-18 Q1
Q2
Q3
2017-18 Q4
2018-19 Q1
Q2
Q3
2018-19 Q4
2019-20 Q1
Q2
Q3
2019-20 Q4
2020-21 Q1
Q2
-0.1
-0.2
-0.3
-0.4
At first difference, series seems to have a constant mean, and now can be processed for checking AR
and MA processes.
We can see from Correlogram that ACF and PACF are significant only for 1 levels only, so we must check
ARMA levels for those ARIMA (p,d,q) models:-(0,1,1), (1,1,0),(1,1,1).
ARMA Check at (0,1,1) levels.
As we find that AIC is highest for ARIMA(1,1,1) model we will prefer ARIMA (1,1,1) model for further
forecasts and analysis.
we look for coefficients of AR (1), MA (1) and Constant using Conditional Least Squares:
We have taken data till 2019Q4 as sample and used Forecast function on ARIMA(1,1,1) model to predict
remaining 6 quarters of data and the above picture shows E-Vies Forecast result.