Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1
From the Department of Radiology, Hospital de Sant Pau,
Avda Sant Antoni M. Claret 167, Barcelona 08128, Spain.
Received November 19, 2009; revision requested January 7,
2010; revision received February 4; accepted February 17;
final version accepted March 1; final review by T.F.
February 24, 2011. Address correspondence to the
author (e-mail: tfranquet@santpau.cat ).
q
RSNA, 2011
M
ore than 55 million people die each up to 50%–64% of patients admitted to tive reaction that may be seen in a variety
year worldwide, and pneumonia the hospital with pneumonia. The recent of clinical contexts. In other words, orga-
is among the leading causes (1). development of multidetector helical com- nizing pneumonia may result from a vari-
Viral infections are an increasingly fre- puted tomographic (CT) scanners capa- ety of causes or underlying pathologic
quent cause of pulmonary disease world- ble of rapid scanning and acquisition processes, including viral infections.
wide. Unfortunately, the diagnosis of of thin sections has revolutionized the Most respiratory viruses damage cells
viral pneumonia still relies heavily on thin-section CT technique. Volumetric directly through cytopathic effects me-
clinician suspicion in the proper set- thin-section CT with thin detectors (0.5– diated by means of either viral-directed
ting, which is based on host risk fac- 0.625 mm) has become the routine in cell lysis or the inhibition of host cell
tors, presentation, and exposures. The many institutions. New serologic tests RNA, protein, and DNA synthesis. Other
diagnostic approach involves a consid- have also come to the aid of the clinician, viruses (eg, cytomegalovirus [CMV], ade-
eration of the likely pathogens on the and sophisticated molecular methods are novirus, or herpesvirus) may produce
basis of the patient’s presenting signs becoming more commonplace in routine specific nuclear changes or characteris-
and symptoms and his or her immuno- diagnosis of acute respiratory disease tic cytoplasmic inclusions (11) (Fig 1).
logic condition (2,3). The clinical mani- in both immunocompetent and high-risk Cytopathic respiratory viruses (eg,
festations of most viral infections are patients (1,6–8). Confirmation of the di- influenza, adenovirus, and herpesvirus
similar. Although most of these infec- agnosis and identification of the specific group) cause a virus-specific lung injury
tions in nonimmunocompromised per- agent can be accomplished with use of pattern. Influenza virus affects the epi-
sons are self-limited, some patients can tissue cultures, serologic tests, detection thelium diffusely and, in severe cases, re-
develop severe pneumonitis (4). Clini- of viral antigens within respiratory tract sults in necrotizing bronchitis and/or bron-
cally, viral pneumonia in adults can be secretions or blood with use of mono- chiolitis and diffuse alveolar damage.
divided into two groups: so-called atyp- clonal antibodies, detection of virus- The histologic features of influenza
ical pneumonia in otherwise healthy hosts associated molecules with use of in situ pneumonia are epithelial necrosis of the
and viral pneumonia in immunocom- hybridization or polymerase chain reac- airways with submucosal chronic inflam-
promised hosts (5). Influenza virus types tion (PCR), and observation of virus- mation. Fatal influenza pneumonia rep-
A and B account for most viral pneumo- induced changes cytologically or histolog- resents a necrotizing bronchiolitis with
nias in immunocompetent adults (5). It ically (9,10). The purpose of this review diffuse alveolar damage, which can be
has been considered that clinical his- is to provide a framework with which to hemorrhagic.
tory, results of physical examination, better understand respiratory viral infec- Adenovirus has its greatest effect in
and imaging features cannot enable the tions, the diverse clinical settings in which the terminal bronchioles and may pro-
prediction of the etiologic agent. Further- they occur, and their potential importance duce bronchiolitis or even bronchiectasis
more, a pathogen is identified in only in these varying clinical contexts. While (12–14). The bronchiolitis may be necro-
acknowledging the less-than-definitive tizing and result in a necrotizing broncho-
Essentials diagnostic role of CT in their diagnosis, pneumonia similar to that seen in severe
n Viral pulmonary infections are I will also include discussion of those herpes simplex infection (13) (Fig 2).
clinically important in both immu- conditions in which an understanding of The herpes group of viruses (herpes
nocompromised and immunocom- the pathologic characteristics can be use- simplex, varicella-zoster, CMV, Epstein-
petent patients; despite its limita- ful to the interpretation of thin-section Barr virus [EBV]) may cause focal cyto-
tions, CT is currently the imaging CT findings. The epidemiology and path- pathic effects in either the airway or
modality of choice for the evalua- ogenesis of viral infections are discussed alveoli. The histologic features of herpes
tion of pulmonary viral infections. in Appendix E1 (online). simplex lower respiratory tract infection
n Although the CT features of viral
pulmonary infections are usually Histologic Features of Viral Infections Published online
nonspecific, precise imaging char- 10.1148/radiol.11092149 Content codes:
Various histopathologic patterns of
acterization is essential; knowl-
lung injury have been described in viral Radiology 2011; 260:18–39
edge of CT findings has a substan-
pneumonia. Although some of these
tial effect on the treatment of Abbreviations:
patterns may be relatively unique to a AIDS = acquired immunodeficiency syndrome
patients suspected of having pul-
specific clinical context, others are non- CMV = cytomegalovirus
monary viral infections.
specific with respect to either the cause EBV = Epstein-Barr virus
n Knowledge of the underlying or pathogenesis. HMPV = human metapneumovirus
pathologic characteristics of Viruses can result in several patho- HTLV-1 = human T-cell lymphotropic virus type 1
these diseases aids in the differ- PCR = polymerase chain reaction
logic forms of lower respiratory tract
RSV = respiratory syncytial virus
entiation of viral infections from infection, including tracheobronchitis, SARS = severe acute respiratory syndrome
other entities that may have bronchiolitis, and pneumonia. Organiz-
overlapping imaging features. ing pneumonia is a nonspecific repara- Author stated no financial relationship to disclose.
include necrosis of the airway epithelium, Coxsackievirus B, reoviruses, and damage (intraalveolar edema, fibrin,
necrotizing pneumonia as the reaction rhinoviruses may also infect the lungs, and variable cellular infiltrates with a
spreads from the airways to the adjacent usually producing interstitial pneumonias hyaline membrane), intraalveolar hem-
parenchyma, diffuse alveolar damage, with diffuse alveolar damage. Human orrhage, and interstitial (intrapulmonary
miliary nodules, and scattered larger nod- papilloma viruses are known to cause re- or airway) inflammatory cell infiltra-
ules (15) (Fig 3). Multicentric areas of current papillomas and have been linked tion (20).
hemorrhage may appear centered on air- to lung cancer.
ways. An acute lung injury pattern may In immunocompetent individuals,
be present, with interstitial edema, con- RSV and parainfluenza viruses may pro- Clinical Manifestations
gestion, and inflammation. Histologic duce necrotizing bronchiolitis charac- The clinical signs and symptoms of viral
features of varicella-zoster virus pneu- terized by exudates within bronchiolar pneumonia are often nonspecific, and
monia include endothelial damage in small lumen, inflammatory cells in the wall the clinical course of infection will be
vessels, with focal hemorrhagic necro- of bronchioles, a peribronchiolar reac- highly dependent on the overall immune
sis, mononuclear infiltration of alveolar tion with chronic inflammatory cells, and status of the host (3). Acute bronchioli-
walls, and fibrinous exudates in the alve- exudate in alveoli. In immunocompro- tis is a term most often used to describe
oli (16). Late sequelae of varicella-zoster mised patients, parainfluenza viruses an illness in infants and children char-
infection consist of multiple 1–2-mm- produce giant cell pneumonia with dif- acterized by acute wheezing with con-
diameter calcified nodules (17). fuse alveolar damage indistinguishable comitant signs of respiratory viral infec-
The histologic findings in CMV pneu- from that caused by measles pneumonia. tion (21). RSV is the etiologic agent in most
monia include either an acute intersti- Measles virus may involve both air- patients, but other viruses (adenovirus,
tial pneumonia or a miliary pattern. Acute ways and lung parenchyma, producing influenza, parainfluenza) and nonviral
interstitial pneumonia is characterized bronchitis and/or bronchiolitis and in- pathogens (mycoplasma, Chlamydia spe-
by a diffuse mild alveolar widening by terstitial pneumonia. cies) can cause a similar syndrome (22).
edema and mononuclear cells, airspace The predominant pathologic process Symptomatic acute bronchiolitis in
fibrinous exudate and/or hyaline mem- of hantavirus pulmonary syndrome and adults is relatively rare but can be caused
branes with relatively scant neutrophils, severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) by infectious agents such as RSV. Be-
and prominent type 2 alveolar lining cells is diffuse alveolar damage and diffuse cause small airways in adults contribute
(Fig 4); foci of organizing pneumonia lung disease characterized histologically less to total pulmonary resistance, acute
are often found. The miliary pattern is by interstitial edema and central alveo- infectious bronchiolitis may spare adults
similar to that of other miliary viral in- lar filling (18,19) (Fig 5). the severe symptoms characteristic of
fections; nodules contain the infected The radiologic findings reflect the bronchiolitis in infants. Acute bronchi-
cells with the characteristic cytoplasmic variable extent of the histopathologic olitis in adults may also be seen with
inclusions of CMV. features, which include diffuse alveolar aspiration, toxic inhalation, connective
three- to fourfold increase in positive spec- associated with increased frequency and attenuation pattern) are a recognized
imens has been found when PCR test- severity of viral infections include very finding in some viral infections caused
ing is added to conventional cell culture young and old age, malnutrition, and by hypoventilation of alveoli distal to
and/or “standard” serologic methods. The immunologic disorders. bronchiolar obstruction (inflammation or
downside of PCR is that it may be too sen- Chest radiographs demonstrate nor- cicatricial scarring of many bronchioles),
sitive, in that it can detect small amounts mal findings or unilateral or patchy bi- which leads to secondary vasoconstric-
of residual viral nucleic acid when there lateral areas of consolidation, nodular tion (and, consequently, underperfused
is no other laboratory or clinical evidence opacities, bronchial wall thickening, and lung) and is seen on CT scans as areas
that a viral infection is present. Factors small pleural effusions; lobar consolida- of decreased attenuation (44–46). Paired
that lead to negative laboratory results tion is uncommon in patients with viral CT scans obtained in inspiration and
include poor specimen handling and col- pneumonia. Patients may develop acute expiration are useful for differentiating
lection, low viral copy numbers, and in- pneumonia with rapid progression to bronchiolar disease from pulmonary vas-
hibitors in the clinical sample (10). acute respiratory distress syndrome. cular disease and some diffuse infiltrative
Although radiographic findings alone diseases that may also cause a mosaic
Reverse Transcriptase PCR are not sufficient for the definitive diagno- pattern. In bronchiolar disease, the re-
Reverse transcriptase PCR is a modi- sis of viral pneumonia, in combination gions of decreased attenuation seen in
fication of PCR used when the initial with clinical findings they can substan- the lung at inspiration are also seen at
template is RNA rather than DNA. Reverse tially improve the accuracy of diagnosis expiration owing to air trapping and show
transcriptase PCR can be used to am- in this disease. little increase in attenuation or decrease
plify a much higher number of DNA cop- in volume as seen with primary vascular
ies present in bacteria, fungi, virus, or Thin-Section CT Findings lung disease (47,48) (Fig 6).
other proteins (10). An increasing number of patients un- Uninvolved segments of lung show
Despite the obvious advantages of dergo thin-section CT when there is high normal or increased perfusion with re-
these newer procedures, there may be clinical suspicion of pneumonia with nor- sulting normal or increased attenuation,
potential limitations to DNA amplifica- mal or questionable radiographic find- respectively. In the specific context, co-
tion technology in the diagnostic micro- ings (32–38). In a study of 87 consec- existing inflammatory small airways and
biology laboratory, as follows: (a) False- utive patients with febrile neutropenia, parenchyma disease may both contribute
negative test results may occur because Heussel et al (39) noted that the CT scan to a mosaic attenuation pattern (49).
of the presence of substances in the revealed a pulmonary lesion not seen Nevertheless, differentiation between
specimen that inhibit nucleic acid extrac- on the radiograph in 50% of subjects. the various causes of a mosaic attenuation
tion or amplification, (b) careful inter- The CT signs of pulmonary viral in- pattern on CT scans (diffuse infiltrative,
pretation of results is necessary, (c) the fection will depend on the underlying small airways, and occlusive vascular dis-
procedure is technically complex, (d) pathologic process. They are quite sim- eases) is not always straightforward and
equipment is expensive, and (e) there is ilar simply because the underlying path- may, on occasion, cause diagnostic dif-
a lack of standardization (30,31). ogenic mechanism, depending on the ficulties (45,48).
virulence of the virus, is related to var- Ground-glass opacity and consoli-
iable extents of histopathologic features dation.—A ground-glass opacity is a hazy
Imaging of Viral Pneumonia such as diffuse alveolar damage (intraal- increase in attenuation seen in a variety
In patients suspected of having viral pneu- veolar edema, fibrin, and variable cellu- of interstitial and alveolar processes. In
monia, imaging is performed to help de- lar infiltrates with a hyaline membrane), the context of pulmonary infectious
tect disease, assess disease extent, per- intraalveolar hemorrhage, and intersti- diseases, coexisting thickening of the
form follow-up assessment of response tial (intrapulmonary or airway) inflam- interstitium and partial filling of the air-
to treatment, and guide interventional matory cell infiltration (40,41). spaces may both contribute to ground-
diagnostic procedures (eg, bronchos- The spectrum of CT findings encoun- glass opacity and consolidation (Fig 7).
copy with bronchoalveolar lavage). tered in various pulmonary viral diseases Nevertheless, other noninfectious con-
It can be difficult to differentiate viral is not particularly wide and encompasses ditions characterized by ground-glass
pneumonia from other infectious pro- five main categories: (a) parenchymal opacity include interstitial pulmonary
cesses, and the cause of infection (eg, attenuation disturbances; (b) ground- edema, pulmonary hemorrhage (in which
viral vs pyogenic or fungal) cannot be glass opacity and consolidation; (c) nod- there is thickening of the interstitium
reliably ascertained from its imaging ules, micronodules, and tree-in-bud opac- and partial filling of the airspaces with
appearance. ities; (d) interlobular septal thickening; blood), hypersensitivity pneumonitis, re-
and (e) bronchial and/or bronchiolar spiratory bronchiolitis, organizing pneu-
Conventional Radiographic Findings wall thickening (42,43). monia, and alveolar proteinosis (50–54).
Radiologic features are dependent on Parenchymal attenuation distur- Areas of pulmonary consolidation are
several host factors, including age and bances.—Patchy inhomogeneities in the most often patchy and poorly defined
underlying immune status; risk factors attenuation of lung parenchyma (mosaic (consistent with bronchopneumonia) or
Figure 6 Figure 7
Figure 10 Figure 11
Furthermore, in most cases, a tree-in- chioles by inflammatory exudates and try of the virus capsid (helical vs icosa-
bud appearance is associated with air- bronchiolar wall thickening from edema hedral), and (c) the presence or absence
ways infection. Infectious diseases asso- and smooth muscle hyperplasia pro- of a lipid envelope.
ciated with cellular bronchiolitis and duce the thin-section CT features of The respiratory viruses can be di-
centrilobular nodules include endobron- atelectasis, air trapping, centrilobular vided into two large groups according
chial spread of tuberculosis, nontuber- nodules, and bronchiolar wall thickening. to the type of nuclei acid they contain
culous mycobacteria bronchopneumo- Air trapping may be present because of (Table 2).
nia (57–62), and infectious bronchiolitis associated bronchiolitis (Fig 11). A sum-
(56). Branching or centrilobular nodules mary of CT findings in viral pneumonia Selected RNA Virus–related Diseases
and mosaic perfusion are seen in pa- is shown in Table 1. Influenza.—Influenza viruses are single-
tients with viral bronchiolitis (63,64). In clinical practice, radiologists will stranded RNA viruses that belong to
Similar findings may also be observed have to consider that there are many the family Orthomyxoviridae. Influenza
with bacterial and fungal pneumonia noninfectious or different infectious dis- viruses are important human respira-
and in patients with allergic bronchopul- orders that should be differentiated from tory pathogens that cause seasonal upper
monary aspergillosis (65). viral pneumonia. A combined strategy respiratory tract infections in the com-
Interlobular septal thickening.—Sep- consisting of thin-section CT and guided munity, endemic infections, and periodic,
tal thickening may be seen in the pres- bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar la- unpredictable pandemics (70). The great-
ence of interstitial fluid, cellular infiltra- vage performed within the first 24 hours est influenza pandemic, the so-called
tion, or fibrosis and can have a smooth, after CT could improve the diagnos- Spanish influenza, spread worldwide in
nodular, or irregular contour in different tic yield and subsequent therapeutic 1918 and resulted in the deaths of ap-
pathologic processes. In the context of changes in these patients. proximately 50 million people (71,63).
viral diseases, the most dramatic cause Influenza type A is the most impor-
of widespread smooth thickening of the tant of the respiratory viruses with re-
interlobular septa is acute respiratory Viral Pathogens of the Respiratory spect to the morbidity and mortality in
distress syndrome (66). Tract the general population. They are more
Smooth septal thickening may also Viral infections of the respiratory tract common during infancy and often may
be seen in association with ground-glass include both those considered to be prin- lead to severe lower respiratory tract
opacity, a pattern termed “crazy pav- cipal respiratory viruses, whose replica- disease. In adults, infections are usually
ing” (Fig 10); this pattern, initially de- tion is generally restricted to the respi- mild and restricted to the upper respi-
scribed as typical of alveolar proteinosis, ratory tract, and others whose respira- ratory tract. Influenza A virus is trans-
has an extensive differential diagnosis tory involvement is part of a generalized mitted from person to person by aero-
(27,67–69). infection. Viruses are classified on the solized or respiratory droplets. In the
Bronchial and bronchiolar wall thick- basis of (a) the type and structure of United States, more than 35 000 deaths
ening.—Bronchiolar wall thickening may the nucleic acid in the viral genome and and 200 000 hospitalizations due to in-
occur due to inflammation or fibrosis. the strategy used in its replication (eg, fluenza occur annually, and the number
In viral bronchitis, obstruction of bron- DNA or RNA), (b) the type of symme- is increasing (64).
Table 1
Summary of CT Findings in Viral Pneumonia
Parenchymal Ground-Glass Nodules, Micronodules, Interlobular Bronchial and/or
Attenuation Opacity and and Tree-in-Bud Septal Bronchiolar Wall
Cause of Pneumonia Disturbances Consolidation Opacities Thickening Thickening Other
RNA viruses
Influenza A … +++ +++ … … …
Avian flu (H5N1) … +++ + … … Pneumatocele, pleural effusion
Swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) … +++ … … … …
Parainfluenza 1–4 … +++ +++ … … …
RSV … +++ +++ … +++ …
HMPV* … +++ +++ … … …
Measles … +++ +++ ++ ++ Pleural effusion, lymphadenopathy
Enteroviruses … … … … … …
Hantavirus … +++ ++ +++ … Acute respiratory distress syndrome
Coronavirus (SARS) … +++ … +++ … Crazy-paving pattern
DNA viruses
Adenovirus … ++ … … +++ Bronchiectasis
Herpes simplex virus … +++ ++ … … Nodules with halo sign
Varicella … ++ +++ … … Nodules with halo sign or calcified
CMV … +++ ++ … … Nodules with halo sign
EPV … +++ + + … Nodules with halo sign
Note.—Plus signs indicate the relative frequency of the findings from lowest (+) to highest (+++).
* HMPV = human metapneumovirus.
Figure 12 Figure 13
Figure 14 Figure 15
Figure 14: Coronal reformation multidetector CT scan in a 46-year- Figure 15: Transverse thin-section CT scan through the lower lobes
old man with swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) viral infection shows bilat- in a patient with parainfluenza pneumonia shows a central area of
eral lobular and subsegmental areas of consolidation involving mainly consolidation in the right lower lobe and ground-glass opacities
the subpleural lung regions (arrowheads). in the left lower lobe.
may occur, leading to respiratory fail- illness occurs in premature infants with to the family Paramyxoviridae that causes
ure. It is a known cause of life-threaten- or without chronic lung disease and in- a febrile illness with rash in children.
ing pneumonia in hematopoietic stem cell fants and young children with congen- Measles virus is highly contagious and
transplant recipients and those with he- ital heart disease (100,101). transmitted from person to person by
matologic malignancies. In adults, epidemiologic studies have either aerosolized droplet nuclei or di-
Gasparetto et al (98) reviewed the demonstrated that HMPV infection ac- rect contact with contaminated respira-
thin-section CT findings in 20 patients counted for 4% of cases among patients tory secretions. After an incubation time
with RSV pneumonitis after hematopoi- with community-acquired pneumonia or of almost 2 weeks, disease starts with a
etic stem cell transplantation and found chronic obstructive pulmonary disease prodromal phase of fever, cough, and
that the predominant patterns of abnor- exacerbations (102,103) and caused a coryza (106). A few days later, a general-
mality were small centrilobular nodules nonspecific respiratory illness in more ized maculopapular skin rash appears—
(50%), airspace consolidation (35%), than 2% of patients with cancer (104). often in combination with conjunctivitis.
ground-glass opacities (30%), and bron- Moreover, HMPV accounted for 9% of Whereas mild pulmonary infection
chial wall thickening (30%) (Fig 16). all acute respiratory infections in pa- often occurs in healthy adults, severe
The abnormalities were located in the tients with hematologic malignancies, pneumonia, with an often protracted and
central and peripheral areas of the lungs with a mortality rate of 11% in the sub- fatal course, may occur in immunocom-
and manifested with a predominantly set of patients who developed lower re- promised and debilitated patients. The
bilateral and asymmetric distribution. spiratory infection (99). mortality in adult measles pneumonitis
HMPV.—HMPV is a recently identi- Recently, Franquet et al (105) re- appears to be lower than that in chil-
fied RNA virus, genus Metapneumovirus. viewed CT findings in five patients with dren; the reported mortality rates vary
Like RSV, HMPV is usually associated HMPV pneumonia and found that the considerably, from 1% up to 36% (107).
with acute respiratory tract infections predominant findings were patchy areas CT findings of measles pneumonia
including upper airway disease, lower of ground-glass attenuation, small nod- are nonspecific and include bronchial wall
airway bronchitis and bronchiolitis, in- ules, and multifocal areas of consolidation thickening, centrilobular nodules, ground-
fluenza-like syndrome, and pneumonia. in a bilateral asymmetric distribution glass opacity, interlobular septal thicken-
Although HMPV has been implicated (Fig 17). Pulmonary parenchymal in- ing, pleural effusion, and lymphadenop-
in 4%–21% of infants with acute bron- volvement during the course of HMPV athy (20,107–109) (Fig 18 ). Nakanishi
chiolitis, their symptoms are clinically pneumonia infection may result in in- et al (110) reported that centrilobular
indistinguishable from those elicited by terstitial lung disease and fibrosis. nodules, ground-glass opacity, and in-
RSV (99). Children typically present with Measles.—Measles is one of the three terlobular septal thickening may indi-
rhinorrhea, fever exceeding 100.4°F major infectious diseases worldwide and cate a measles-specific, virus-induced
(.38°C), nonproductive cough, pro- causes approximately 1.5 million child- pneumonia.
gressive dyspnea, hypoxemia, and bron- hood deaths per year. Measles is a single- In most measles cases, diagnosis is
chiolitis. An increased risk for severe stranded RNA enveloped virus belonging based on clinical symptoms only. The
Figure 16 Figure 18
Figure 17 count for most viruses recovered from and thickening of the bronchovascular
children with summertime upper respi- bundles in the peripheral lung (121).
ratory tract infections (112). Most infec- Hantavirus.—The genus Hantavirus
tions are not associated with pneumonia. comprises a genetically homogeneous
Lower respiratory tract infection may group of enveloped, single-stranded RNA
occur sporadically, and some entero- viruses belonging to the family Bunya-
virus serotypes are capable of producing viridae. During the spring of 1993, an
fulminant, frequently fatal disease in emerging rodent-borne zoonotic disease,
the newborn infant. In the first few characterized by severe acute respira-
days of life, fatal cases of enterovirus tory failure, rapid clinical progression,
pneumonia caused by echovirus types and high case-fatality rates, occurred
6, 9, and 11 and group A coxsackievirus among healthy adults in the southwest-
type 3 have been reported (113–115). ern United States (122).
Enterovirus 69 has been isolated from Hantavirus infection may cause dif-
the throat secretions of infants with bron- fuse airspace disease, termed hantavirus
Figure 17: Close-up view of transverse thin- chiolitis and pneumonia (116). pulmonary syndrome (123). The incu-
section CT scan at the level of the right lower lobe HTLV-1.—HTLV-1 is an RNA retro- bation period for hantavirus pulmonary
in a patient with HMPV infection after hematopoi- virus. It is the first retrovirus to be as- syndrome is typically 1–2 weeks but
etic stem cell transplantation shows multiple centri- sociated with human disease (117). It is ranges from 1 to 4 weeks. The prodromal
lobular nodules (arrows) and focal areas of transmitted by sexual contact, by blood stage is usually 3–5 days (range, 1–10
consolidation (arrowhead). transfusion, from mother to child trans- days) (124). Patients have an abrupt
placentally, and via breast feeding. onset of symptoms, which include fever,
The lung is a preferential site for myalgia, malaise, chills, anorexia, and
most common method is the demon- HTLV-1 infection (118). HTLV-1 is an headache.
stration of measles virus–specific IgM in a etiologic retrovirus of adult T-cell leuke- Although hantavirus pulmonary syn-
single serum sample, but a more than mia or lymphoma (117,119). Myelopa- drome and acute interstitial pneumonia
fourfold titer increase in paired serum thy, Sjögren syndrome, and lymphocytic can share similar clinical presentations,
samples is also formal proof of a recent pneumonitis have been reported in as- acute interstitial pneumonia and fatal
measles virus infection. Virus detection sociation with HTLV-1 infection (120). cases of hantavirus pulmonary syndrome
may be performed by means of virus iso- Clinical-pathologic and radiologic can generally be differentiated on clini-
lation or reverse transcriptase PCR (111). similarities have been demonstrated in cal and histologic grounds, and this dis-
Coxsackievirus, echovirus, and entero- patients with HTLV-1–associated bron- tinction can be further confirmed immu-
virus.—Coxsackievirus is a RNA virus, chiolitis and in those with diffuse pan- nohistochemically (18).
genus Enterovirus. The human neonate bronchiolitis (121). CT findings in pa- Histologically, changes are charac-
is uniquely susceptible to coxsackievirus tients with HTLV-1 consist mainly of cen- teristic for exudative (eg, focal hya-
and echovirus disease. Enteroviruses ac- trilobular nodules, ground-glass opacity, line membranes, extensive intraalveolar
Figure 19
Figure 19: (a) Bedside chest radiograph in a patient with severe hantavirus pulmonary syndrome shows extensive bilateral interstitial opac-
ities. (b) Frontal chest radiograph obtained 6 hours later demonstrates rapid progression to diffuse perihilar and lower lung consolidation,
reflecting associated diffuse alveolar damage. (Images courtesy of Loren Ketai, MD, Albuquerque, NM.)
edema, fibrin, and variable numbers SARS.—SARS caused by SARS- cells, and bronchiolar injury with loss
of inflammatory cells) and proliferative associated coronavirus is a systemic infec- of cilia are other observed features
(eg, proliferation of reparative type II tion that clinically manifests as progres- (136,137). Patients who die after the 10th
pneumocytes, fibroblastic thickening of sive pneumonia (129–131). SARS was first day of illness present with a mixture of
the alveolar septa with severe airspace detected in the Guangdong Province of acute changes and those of the organizing
disorganization, and distortion of lung China in late 2002, with major outbreaks phase of diffuse alveolar damage (19)
architecture) stages of diffuse alveolar in Hong Kong, Guangdong, Singapore, (Fig 5).
damage (18). and Toronto and Vancouver, Canada The imaging features of SARS-asso-
Chest radiographs may be initially (132). More than 8000 people were af- ciated coronavirus infection consist of
normal but progressively worsen, dis- fected, with a mortality rate of 10%. unilateral or bilateral ground-glass opac-
playing signs of pulmonary edema and The typical clinical manifestation of ities, focal unilateral or bilateral areas
acute respiratory distress syndrome SARS-associated coronavirus includes of consolidation, or a mixture of both.
(125,126). The findings at chest radi- an incubation period of 2–10 days, early In the areas of ground-glass opacifica-
ography may represent differences in systemic symptoms followed within 2–7 tion, thickening of the intralobular in-
the extent of alveolar epithelial dam- days by dry cough or shortness of breath, terstitium or interlobular septa may be
age seen in hantavirus pulmonary syn- the development of radiographically con- present (Fig 20). If marked septal thick-
drome and acute respiratory distress firmed pneumonia by day 7–10, and, in ening occurs, a crazy-paving appear-
syndrome (127). The lack of peripheral many cases, lymphocytopenia (133,134). ance results (134,138–141). Cavitation,
distribution of initial airspace disease, Criteria for the confirmation of SARS calcification, a reticular or nodular pat-
the prominence of interstitial edema, at laboratory analysis include detection tern of opacification, lymphadenopathy,
and the presence of pleural effusions of antibodies in a convalescent-phase or pleural effusion are not features of
early in the disease process are in con- blood serum sample, detection of SARS- SARS (14).
trast to the typical radiographic findings associated coronavirus in a clinical speci-
in acute respiratory distress syndrome men with reverse transcriptase PCR, or Selected DNA Viruses
(126) (Fig 19). isolation of SARS-associated coronavirus Adenovirus.—Human adenoviruses are
The CT appearances of hantavirus in a cultured clinical specimen (135). nonenveloped, double-stranded DNA
pulmonary syndrome consist of exten- Histologically, acute diffuse alveolar viruses belonging to the family Adeno-
sive bilateral ground-glass opacities, damage with airspace edema is the most viridae. More than 50 serotypes have
thickened interlobular septa, few poorly prominent feature in patients who die been described, and approximately half
defined small nodules, bronchial wall before the 10th day after onset of illness. of these serotypes are known human
thickening, and small bilateral pleural Hyaline membranes, interstitial edema, pathogens. Depending on the serotype,
effusions (128). interstitial infiltrates of inflammatory adenovirus may cause respiratory disease
Figure 20 Figure 21
Figure 22 Figure 23
Figure 25 Figure 26
cysts and nodules. On CT scans, cysts immunocompromised adults. Chest 2004; severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS).
are round or irregular in shape and usu- 125(4):1343–1351. Histopathology 2004;45(2):119–124.
ally less than 5 cm in diameter; cysts usu- 5. Sullivan CJ, Jordan MC. Diagnosis of viral 20. Kim EA, Lee KS, Primack SL, et al. Viral
ally show smooth but asymmetric thick pneumonia. Semin Respir Infect 1988; pneumonias in adults: radiologic and
walls (2–3 mm) (177,178) (Fig 26). The 3(2):148–161. pathologic findings. RadioGraphics 2002;
22(Spec Issue):S137–S149.
papillomas, either nodules or masses, of- 6. Daum LT, Canas LC, Arulanandam BP,
ten have lobulated margins and measure Niemeyer D, Valdes JJ, Chambers JP. Real- 21. Hall CB. Respiratory syncytial virus and
less than 3 cm in diameter (179). time RT-PCR assays for type and subtype parainfluenza virus. N Engl J Med 2001;
detection of influenza A and B viruses. In- 344(25):1917–1928.
fluenza Other Respir Viruses 2007;1(4):
22. Penn CC, Liu C. Bronchiolitis following in-
167–175.
Conclusion fection in adults and children. Clin Chest
7. Virkki R, Juven T, Mertsola J, Ruuskanen O. Med 1993;14(4):645–654.
Imaging and clinical manifestations of
Radiographic follow-up of pneumonia in
viral pneumonia are not reliably predic- children. Pediatr Pulmonol 2005;40(3):
23. Kim CK, Kim SW, Kim JS, et al. Bronchioli-
tive of its origin. Herein, emphasis was tis obliterans in the 1990s in Korea and the
223–227.
United States. Chest 2001;120(4):1101–1106.
placed on the commonest imaging fea-
8. Copley SJ. Application of computed tomog-
tures of some of the most common vi- raphy in childhood respiratory infections.
24. Johnson BA, Iacono AT, Zeevi A, McCurry
ruses that produce pulmonary disease. KR, Duncan SR. Statin use is associated
Br Med Bull 2002;61:263–279.
with improved function and survival of
Thin-section CT is an effective diag- 9. Shelhamer JH, Gill VJ, Quinn TC, et al. The lung allografts. Am J Respir Crit Care Med
nostic method when findings at chest laboratory evaluation of opportunistic pul- 2003;167(9):1271–1278.
radiography are normal or inconclusive. monary infections. Ann Intern Med 1996;
Although the radiologic manifestations 124(6):585–599. 25. Anderson LJ, Patriarca PA, Hierholzer JC,
Noble GR. Viral respiratory illnesses. Med
of viral pneumonia are nonspecific and 10. Cuchacovich R. Clinical applications of the Clin North Am 1983;67(5):1009–1030.
difficult to differentiate from those of polymerase chain reaction: an update. Infect
other infections, it is important to con- Dis Clin North Am 2006;20(4):735–758, v. 26. Templeton KE, Scheltinga SA, Beersma MF,
Kroes AC, Claas EC. Rapid and sensitive
sider viral infection when confronted 11. Torres HA, Aguilera E, Safdar A, et al. Fatal method using multiplex real-time PCR for
with a rapidly progressive pneumonia cytomegalovirus pneumonia in patients with diagnosis of infections by influenza A and in-
in patients with risk factors for infec- haematological malignancies: an autopsy- fluenza B viruses, respiratory syncytial virus,
tion. Although definitive diagnosis can- based case-control study. Clin Microbiol and parainfluenza viruses 1, 2, 3, and 4.
not be made on the basis of imaging Infect 2008;14(12):1160–1166. J Clin Microbiol 2004;42(4):1564–1569.
features alone, a combination of clinical 12. Aherne W, Bird T, Court SD, Gardner PS, 27. Fox JD. Nucleic acid amplification tests
and radiographic findings can substan- McQuillin J. Pathological changes in virus for detection of respiratory viruses. J Clin
infections of the lower respiratory tract in Virol 2007;40(suppl 1):S15–S23.
tially improve the accuracy of diagnosis
children. J Clin Pathol 1970;23(1):7–18.
in this disease. 28. Aslanzadeh J, Zheng X, Li H, et al. Pro-
Future challenges include a greater 13. Becroft DM. Histopathology of fatal adeno- spective evaluation of rapid antigen tests
virus infection of the respiratory tract in
insight into the appropriate timing and for diagnosis of respiratory syncytial virus
young children. J Clin Pathol 1967;20(4): and human metapneumovirus infections.
indication of imaging studies, determi- 561–569. J Clin Microbiol 2008;46(5):1682–1685.
nation of the relative value of imaging
14. Becroft DM. Bronchiolitis obliterans, bron-
versus molecular analysis for the diag- 29. Pabbaraju K, Tokaryk KL, Wong S, Fox JD.
chiectasis, and other sequelae of adenovi- Comparison of the Luminex xTAG respira-
nosis of viral infections, and an evalua- rus type 21 infection in young children. tory viral panel with in-house nucleic acid
tion of the effect of surveillance imaging J Clin Pathol 1971;24(1):72–82. amplification tests for diagnosis of respira-
on patient outcome. tory virus infections. J Clin Microbiol 2008;
15. Nash G, Foley FD. Herpetic infection of the
middle and lower respiratory tract. Am J 46(9):3056–3062.
Clin Pathol 1970;54(6):857–863. 30. Teba L. Polymerase chain reaction: a new
References
16. Mohsen AH, McKendrick M. Varicella pneu- chapter in critical care diagnosis. Crit Care
1. Greenberg SB. Respiratory viral infections monia in adults. Eur Respir J 2003;21(5): Med 1999;27(5):860–861.
in adults. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2002;8(3): 886–891.
31. Lo YM, Mehal WZ, Fleming KA. False-
201–208.
17. Brunton FJ, Moore ME. A survey of pul- positive results and the polymerase chain
2. Parienti JJ, Carrat F. Viral pneumonia and monary calcification following adult chicken- reaction. Lancet 1988;2(8612):679.
respiratory sepsis: association, causation, pox. Br J Radiol 1969;42(496):256–259.
32. Kotloff RM, Ahya VN, Crawford SW. Pul-
or it depends? Crit Care Med 2007;35(2):
18. Colby TV, Zaki SR, Feddersen RM, Nolte KB. monary complications of solid organ and
639–640.
Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome is distin- hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
3. Marcos MA, Esperatti M, Torres A. Viral guishable from acute interstitial pneu- Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2004;170(1):
pneumonia. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2009; monia. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2000;124(10): 22–48.
22(2):143–147. 1463–1466.
33. Demirkazik FB, Akin A, Uzun O, Akpinar
4. de Roux A, Marcos MA, Garcia E, et al. 19. Cheung OY, Chan JW, Ng CK, Koo CK. MG, Ariyürek MO. CT findings in immu-
Viral community-acquired pneumonia in non- The spectrum of pathological changes in nocompromised patients with pulmonary
infections. Diagn Interv Radiol 2008;14(2): lung, airway, and vascular diseases as a culous therapy. Radiology 1993 ; 186 ( 3):
75–82. cause. Radiology 1997;205(2):465–470. 653–660.
34. Aquino SL, Dunagan DP, Chiles C, Haponik 46. Remy-Jardin M, Remy J, Gosselin B, Copin 60. Hartman TE, Swensen SJ, Williams DE.
EF. Herpes simplex virus 1 pneumonia: pat- MC, Wurtz A, Duhamel A. Sliding thin slab, Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare com-
terns on CT scans and conventional chest minimum intensity projection technique in plex: evaluation with CT. Radiology 1993;
radiographs. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998; the diagnosis of emphysema: histopathologic- 187(1):23–26.
22(5):795–800. CT correlation. Radiology 1996;200(3):
61. Itoh H, Tokunaga S, Asamoto H, et al.
665–671.
35. Gulati M, Kaur R, Jha V, Venkataramu NK, Radiologic-pathologic correlations of small
Gupta D, Suri S. High-resolution CT in re- 47. Stern EJ, Müller NL, Swensen SJ, Hartman lung nodules with special reference to peri-
nal transplant patients with suspected pul- TE. CT mosaic pattern of lung attenuation: bronchiolar nodules. AJR Am J Roentgenol
monary infections. Acta Radiol 2000;41(3): etiologies and terminology. J Thorac Imag- 1978;130(2):223–231.
237–241. ing 1995;10(4):294–297.
62. Lee KS, Kim YH, Kim WS, Hwang SH,
36. Franquet T. Imaging of pneumonia: trends 48. Stern EJ, Swensen SJ, Hartman TE, Frank Kim PN, Lee BH. Endobronchial tubercu-
and algorithms. Eur Respir J 2001;18(1): MS. CT mosaic pattern of lung attenuation: losis: CT features. J Comput Assist Tomogr
196–208. distinguishing different causes. AJR Am J 1991;15(3):424–428.
Roentgenol 1995;165(4):813–816. 63. Taubenberger JK, Reid AH, Krafft AE,
37. Franquet T, Müller NL, Giménez A, Martínez
S, Madrid M, Domingo P. Infectious pul- 49. Martin KW, Sagel SS, Siegel BA. Mosaic Bijwaard KE, Fanning TG. Initial genetic
monary nodules in immunocompromised oligemia simulating pulmonary infiltrates characterization of the 1918 “Spanish” in-
patients: usefulness of computed tomogra- on CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986;147(4): fluenza virus. Science 1997;275(5307):
phy in predicting their etiology. J Comput 670–673. 1793–1796.
Assist Tomogr 2003;27(4):461–468. 64. Rothberg MB, Haessler SD, Brown RB.
50. Shah RM, Miller W Jr. Widespread ground-
38. Logan PM, Primack SL, Staples C, Miller glass opacity of the lung in consecutive Complications of viral influenza. Am J Med
RR, Müller NL. Acute lung disease in the patients undergoing CT: does lobular distri- 2008;121(4):258–264.
immunocompromised host: diagnostic ac- bution assist diagnosis? AJR Am J Roent- 65. Oikonomou A, Müller NL, Nantel S. Radio-
curacy of the chest radiograph. Chest 1995; genol 2003;180(4):965–968. graphic and high-resolution CT findings of
108(5):1283–1287. influenza virus pneumonia in patients with
51. Erasmus JJ, McAdams HP, Rossi SE. High-
39. Heussel CP, Kauczor HU, Heussel G, resolution CT of drug-induced lung disease. hematologic malignancies. AJR Am J Roent-
Fischer B, Mildenberger P, Thelen M. Early Radiol Clin North Am 2002;40(1):61–72. genol 2003;181(2):507–511.
detection of pneumonia in febrile neutro- 66. Ostapchuk M, Roberts DM, Haddy R.
52. Flaherty KR. High-resolution computed to-
penic patients: use of thin-section CT. AJR Community-acquired pneumonia in infants
mography and the many faces of idiopathic
Am J Roentgenol 1997;169(5):1347–1353. and children. Am Fam Physician 2004;
pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care
40. Franquet T, Rodriguez S, Martino R, Giménez Med 2008;177(4):367–368. 70(5):899–908.
A, Salinas T, Hidalgo A. Thin-section CT 67. Lahti E, Peltola V, Virkki R, Ruuskanen O.
53. Flaherty KR, Martinez FJ. Nonspecific in-
findings in hematopoietic stem cell trans- Influenza pneumonia. Pediatr Infect Dis J
terstitial pneumonia. Semin Respir Crit
plantation recipients with respiratory virus 2006;25(2):160–164.
Care Med 2006;27(6):652–658.
pneumonia. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2006;
187(4):1085–1090. 54. Silva CI, Churg A, Müller NL. Hypersensitiv- 68. Shlaes DM. Respiratory syncytial virus in-
ity pneumonitis: spectrum of high-resolution fection: an emerging or unappreciated in-
41. Kanne JP, Godwin JD, Franquet T, Escuissato fection? Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2000;
CT and pathologic findings. AJR Am J
DL, Müller NL. Viral pneumonia after he- 21(4):305–311.
Roentgenol 2007;188(2):334–344.
matopoietic stem cell transplantation: high-
resolution CT findings. J Thorac Imaging 55. Gruden JF, Webb WR, Warnock M. Cen- 69. Kuiken T, Taubenberger JK. Pathology of
2007;22(3):292–299. trilobular opacities in the lung on high- human influenza revisited. Vaccine 2008;
resolution CT: diagnostic considerations 26(suppl 4):D59–D66.
42. Müller NL. High-resolution computed tomog-
and pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roent- 70. Taubenberger JK, Morens DM. The pathol-
raphy of diffuse lung disease. Curr Opin
genol 1994;162(3):569–574. ogy of influenza virus infections. Annu Rev
Radiol 1989;1(1):5–8.
56. Müller NL, Miller RR. Diseases of the bron- Pathol 2008;3:499–522.
43. Müller NL. Differential diagnosis of chronic
chioles: CT and histopathologic findings. 71. Reid AH, Taubenberger JK, Fanning TG.
diffuse infiltrative lung disease on high-
Radiology 1995;196(1):3–12. The 1918 Spanish influenza: integrating his-
resolution computed tomography. Semin
tory and biology. Microbes Infect 2001;3(1):
Roentgenol 1991;26(2):132–142. 57. Murata K, Khan A, Herman PG. Pulmonary
81–87.
parenchymal disease: evaluation with high-
44. Sherrick AD, Swensen SJ, Hartman TE.
resolution CT. Radiology 1989;170(3 Pt 1): 72. Nichols WG, Guthrie KA, Corey L, Boeckh
Mosaic pattern of lung attenuation on CT
629–635. M. Influenza infections after hematopoietic
scans: frequency among patients with pul-
stem cell transplantation: risk factors, mor-
monary artery hypertension of different 58. Murata K, Itoh H, Todo G, et al. Centri-
tality, and the effect of antiviral therapy.
causes. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997;169(1): lobular lesions of the lung: demonstration
Clin Infect Dis 2004;39(9):1300–1306.
79–82. by high-resolution CT and pathologic cor-
relation. Radiology 1986;161(3):641–645. 73. de Jong MD, Hien TT. Avian influenza A
45. Worthy SA, Müller NL, Hartman TE, Swensen
(H5N1). J Clin Virol 2006;35(1):2–13.
SJ, Padley SP, Hansell DM. Mosaic attenu- 59. Im JG, Itoh H, Shim YS, et al. Pulmonary
ation pattern on thin-section CT scans of tuberculosis: CT findings—early active dis- 74. Uyeki TM. Human infection with highly
the lung: differentiation among infiltrative ease and sequential change with antituber- pathogenic avian influenza A (H5N1) virus:
review of clinical issues. Clin Infect Dis 89. Carr MJ, Gunson R, Maclean A, et al. Devel- 20-year experience. J Infect Dis 2006;
2009;49(2):279–290. opment of a real-time RT-PCR for the detec- 193(3):387–395.
tion of swine-lineage influenza A (H1N1) virus
75. Tran TH, Nguyen TL, Nguyen TD, et al. 102. Hamelin ME, Côté S, Laforge J, et al. Human
infections. J Clin Virol 2009;45(3):196–199.
Avian influenza A (H5N1) in 10 patients metapneumovirus infection in adults with
in Vietnam. N Engl J Med 2004;350(12): 90. Whiley DM, Bialasiewicz S, Bletchly C, community-acquired pneumonia and ex-
1179–1188. et al. Detection of novel influenza A(H1N1) acerbation of chronic obstructive pulmo-
virus by real-time RT-PCR. J Clin Virol nary disease. Clin Infect Dis 2005;41(4):
76. Qureshi NR, Hien TT, Farrar J, Gleeson FV.
2009;45(3):203–204. 498–502.
The radiologic manifestations of H5N1 avian
influenza. J Thorac Imaging 2006;21(4): 91. Ajlan AMQB, Quiney B, Nicolaou S, Müller 103. Johnstone J, Majumdar SR, Fox JD, Marrie
259–264. NL. Swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) viral TJ. Human metapneumovirus pneumonia
infection: radiographic and CT findings. AJR in adults: results of a prospective study.
77. Subbarao K, Klimov A, Katz J, et al. Char-
Am J Roentgenol 2009;193(6):1494–1499. Clin Infect Dis 2008;46(4):571–574.
acterization of an avian influenza A (H5N1)
virus isolated from a child with a fatal re- 92. Reichman RC, Dolin R. Viral pneumonias. 104. Kamboj M, Gerbin M, Huang CK, et al.
spiratory illness. Science 1998;279(5349): Med Clin North Am 1980;64(3):491–506. Clinical characterization of human meta-
393–396. pneumovirus infection among patients with
93. Chien JW, Johnson JL. Viral pneumonias:
cancer. J Infect 2008;57(6):464–471.
78. Chan PK. Outbreak of avian influenza epidemic respiratory viruses. Postgrad Med
A(H5N1) virus infection in Hong Kong in 2000;107(3):41–42, 45–47, 51–52. 105. Franquet T, Rodríguez S, Martino R, Salinas
1997. Clin Infect Dis 2002;34(suppl 2): T, Giménez A, Hidalgo A. Human meta-
94. Ferguson PE, Sorrell TC, Bradstock KF,
S58–S64. pneumovirus infection in hematopoietic stem
Carr P, Gilroy NM. Parainfluenza virus
cell transplant recipients: high-resolution
79. Wong SS, Yuen KY. Avian influenza virus type 3 pneumonia in bone marrow trans-
computed tomography findings. J Comput
infections in humans. Chest 2006;129(1): plant recipients: multiple small nodules in
Assist Tomogr 2005;29(2):223–227.
156–168. high-resolution lung computed tomography
scans provide a radiological clue to diagno- 106. Rima BK, Duprex WP. Morbilliviruses and
80. Writing Committee of the Second World
sis. Clin Infect Dis doi:10.1086/597297. Pub- human disease. J Pathol 2006;208(2):
Health Organization Consultation on Clini-
lished online February 17, 2009. Accessed 199–214.
cal Aspects of Human Infection with Avian
February 19, 2009.
Influenza A (H5N1) Virus, Abdel-Ghafar 107. Gremillion DH, Crawford GE. Measles pneu-
AN, Chotpitayasunondh T, et al. Update on 95. Simmonds A, Munoz J, Montecalvo M, monia in young adults: an analysis of 106
avian influenza A (H5N1) virus infection in Clones B, Lagamma EF. Outbreak of para- cases. Am J Med 1981;71(4):539–542.
humans. N Engl J Med 2008;358(3):261–273. influenza virus type 3 in a neonatal inten-
108. Quinn JL III. Measles pneumonia in an
sive care unit. Am J Perinatol 2009;26(5):
81. Uyeki TM. Global epidemiology of human adult. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl
361–364.
infections with highly pathogenic avian Med 1964;91:560–563.
influenza A (H5N1) viruses. Respirology 96. Weinberg GA, Hall CB, Iwane MK, et al.
109. Young LW, Smith DI, Glasgow LA. Pneu-
2008;13(suppl 1):S2–S9. Parainfluenza virus infection of young chil-
monia of atypical measles: residual nodu-
dren: estimates of the population-based
82. Chotpitayasunondh T, Ungchusak K, lar lesions. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther
burden of hospitalization. J Pediatr 2009;
Hanshaoworakul W, et al. Human disease Nucl Med 1970;110(3):439–448.
154(5):694–699.
from influenza A (H5N1), Thailand, 2004.
110. Nakanishi M, Okamura S, Demura Y,
Emerg Infect Dis 2005;11(2):201–209. 97. Sinaniotis CA. Viral pneumoniae in chil-
Ishizaki T, Miyamori I, Itou H. HRCT find-
dren: incidence and aetiology. Paediatr Re-
83. Chowell G, Bertozzi SM, Colchero MA, ings for four cases of measles pneumonia
spir Rev 2004;5(suppl A):S197–S200.
et al. Severe respiratory disease concur- [in Japanese]. Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai Zasshi
rent with the circulation of H1N1 influenza. 98. Gasparetto EL, Escuissato DL, Marchiori E, 2001;39(7):466–470.
N Engl J Med 2009;361(7):674–679. Ono S, Frare e Silva RL, Müller NL. High-
111. de Witte L, Abt M, Schneider-Schaulies S,
resolution CT findings of respiratory syncy-
84. Butler D. Swine flu goes global. Nature 2009; van Kooyk Y, Geijtenbeek TB. Measles virus
tial virus pneumonia after bone marrow trans-
458(7242):1082–1083. targets DC-SIGN to enhance dendritic cell
plantation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;
infection. J Virol 2006;80(7):3477–3486.
85. Cohen J. Swine flu outbreak. Out of Mexico? 182(5):1133–1137.
Scientists ponder swine flu’s origins. Science 112. Johnson KM, Bloom HH, Forsyth B, Mufson
99. Williams JV, Martino R, Rabella N, et al. A
2009;324(5928):700–702. MA, Webb PA, Chanock RM. The role of
prospective study comparing human meta-
enteroviruses in respiratory disease. Am
86. Perez-Padilla R, de la Rosa-Zamboni D, pneumovirus with other respiratory viruses
Rev Respir Dis 1963;88(suppl):240–245.
Ponce de Leon S, et al. Pneumonia and re- in adults with hematologic malignancies
spiratory failure from swine-origin influenza and respiratory tract infections. J Infect 113. Boyd MT, Jordan SW, Davis LE. Fatal pneu-
A (H1N1) in Mexico. N Engl J Med 2009; Dis 2005;192(6):1061–1065. monitis from congenital echovirus type 6
361(7):680–689. infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J 1987;6(12):
100. Williams JV, Harris PA, Tollefson SJ, et al.
1138–1139.
87. Cohen J, Enserink M. Swine flu: after de- Human metapneumovirus and lower respi-
lays, WHO agrees—the 2009 pandemic has ratory tract disease in otherwise healthy 114. Toce SS, Keenan WJ. Congenital echovirus
begun. Science 2009;324(5934):1496–1497. infants and children. N Engl J Med 2004; 11 pneumonia in association with pulmo-
350(5):443–450. nary hypertension. Pediatr Infect Dis J
88. World Health Organization. Global alert
1988;7(5):360–362.
and response (GAR): Pandemic (H1N1) 2009. 101. Williams JV, Wang CK, Yang CF, et al. The
http://www.who.int/csr/disease/swineflu role of human metapneumovirus in upper 115. Cheeseman SH, Hirsch MS, Keller EW,
/en/. Accessed April 29, 2009. respiratory tract infections in children: a Keim DE. Fatal neonatal pneumonia caused
by echovirus type 9. Am J Dis Child 1977; 128. Gasparetto EL, Davaus T, Escuissato DL, 141. Paul NS, Roberts H, Butany J, et al. Radio-
131(10):1169. Marchiori E. Hantavirus pulmonary syn- logic pattern of disease in patients with
drome: high-resolution CT findings in one severe acute respiratory syndrome: the
116. Schieble JH, Fox VL, Lennette EH. A prob-
patient. Br J Radiol 2007;80(949):e21–e23. Toronto experience. RadioGraphics 2004;
able new human picornavirus associated
24(2):553–563.
with respiratory diseases. Am J Epidemiol 129. Ketai L, Paul NS, Wong KT. Radiology of
1967;85(2):297–310. severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS): 142. Chen HL, Chiou SS, Hsiao HP, et al. Respi-
the emerging pathologic-radiologic corre- ratory adenoviral infections in children: a
117. Watanabe T. HTLV-1-associated diseases.
lates of an emerging disease. J Thorac Im- study of hospitalized cases in southern Tai-
Int J Hematol 1997;66(3):257–278.
aging 2006;21(4):276–283. wan in 2001–2002. J Trop Pediatr 2004;
118. Sugimoto M, Kitaichi M, Ikeda A, Nagai S, 50(5):279–284.
130. Peiris JS, Yuen KY, Osterhaus AD, Stöhr K.
Izumi T. Chronic bronchioloalveolitis asso-
The severe acute respiratory syndrome. 143. Myers GD, Bollard CM, Wu MF, et al. Re-
ciated with human T-cell lymphotrophic
N Engl J Med 2003;349(25):2431–2441. constitution of adenovirus-specific cell-
virus type I infection. Curr Opin Pulm Med
mediated immunity in pediatric patients
1998;4(2):98–102. 131 . Muller MP, McGeer A. Severe acute respi-
after hematopoietic stem cell transplanta-
ratory syndrome (SARS) coronavirus. Semin
119. Poiesz BJ, Ruscetti FW, Gazdar AF, Bunn PA, tion. Bone Marrow Transplant 2007;39(11):
Respir Crit Care Med 2007;28(2):201–212.
Minna JD, Gallo RC. Detection and isola- 677–686.
tion of type C retrovirus particles from 132. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
144. Chong S, Lee KS, Kim TS, Chung MJ,
fresh and cultured lymphocytes of a patient (CDC). Outbreak of severe acute respira-
Chung MP, Han J. Adenovirus pneumonia
with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Proc Natl tory syndrome—worldwide, 2003. MMWR
in adults: radiographic and high-resolution
Acad Sci U S A 1980;77(12):7415–7419. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2003 ;52 (11):
CT findings in five patients. AJR Am J
226–228. [Published correction appears
120. Kompoliti A, Gage B, Sharma L, Daniels Roentgenol 2006;186(5):1288–1293.
in MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2003;
JC. Human T-cell lymphotropic virus type
52(13):284.] 145. Müller NL. Unilateral hyperlucent lung:
1–associated myelopathy, Sjögren syndrome,
MacLeod versus Swyer-James. Clin Radiol
and lymphocytic pneumonitis. Arch Neurol 133. Peiris JS, Chu CM, Cheng VC, et al. Clini-
2004;59(11):1048.
1996;53(9):940–942. cal progression and viral load in a commu-
nity outbreak of coronavirus-associated SARS 146. Chang AB, Masel JP, Masters B. Post-
121. Okada F, Ando Y, Yoshitake S, et al. Pulmo-
pneumonia: a prospective study. Lancet infectious bronchiolitis obliterans: clinical,
nary CT findings in 320 carriers of human
2003;361(9371):1767–1772. radiological and pulmonary function se-
T-lymphotropic virus type 1. Radiology 2006;
quelae. Pediatr Radiol 1998;28(1):23–29.
240(2):559–564. 134. Antonio GE, Wong KT, Hui DS, et al. Thin-
section CT in patients with severe acute re- 147. Marti-Bonmati L, Ruiz Perales F, Catala F,
122. Duchin JS, Koster FT, Peters CJ, et al.
spiratory syndrome following hospital dis- Mata JM, Calonge E. CT findings in Swyer-
Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome: a clinical
charge: preliminary experience. Radiology James syndrome. Radiology 1989;172(2):
description of 17 patients with a newly recog-
2003;228(3):810–815. 477–480.
nized disease. The Hantavirus Study Group.
N Engl J Med 1994;330(14):949–955. 135. Guidelines for laboratory diagnosis of SARS- 148. Lynch DA, Brasch RC, Hardy KA, Webb WR.
CoV infection. Centers for Disease Control Pediatric pulmonary disease: assessment
123. Khan AS, Khabbaz RF, Armstrong LR, et al.
and Prevention Web site. http://www.cdc with high-resolution ultrafast CT. Radiology
Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome: the first
.go/ncidod/sars/lab.htm. Accessed May 3, 1990;176(1):243–248.
100 US cases. J Infect Dis 1996 ; 173( 6 ):
2005.
1297–1303. 149. Lucaya J, Gartner S, García-Peña P, Cobos N,
136. Hwang DM, Chamberlain DW, Poutanen Roca I, Liñan S. Spectrum of manifestations
124. Cleri DJ, Ricketti AJ, Porwancher RB,
SM, Low DE, Asa SL, Butany J. Pulmonary of Swyer-James-MacLeod syndrome. J Com-
Ramos-Bonner LS, Vernaleo JR. Viral
pathology of severe acute respiratory syn- put Assist Tomogr 1998;22(4):592–597.
hemorrhagic fevers: current status of en-
drome in Toronto. Mod Pathol 2005;18(1):
demic disease and strategies for control. 150. Stern EJ, Samples TL. Dynamic ultrafast
1–10.
Infect Dis Clin North Am 2006;20(2):359– high resolution CT findings in a case of
393, x. 137. Nicholls JM, Poon LL, Lee KC, et al. Lung Swyer-James syndrome. Pediatr Radiol 1992;
pathology of fatal severe acute respira- 22(5):350–352.
125. Ketai LH, Williamson MR, Telepak RJ, et al.
tory syndrome. Lancet 2003;361(9371):
Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome: radio- 151. Moore AD, Godwin JD, Dietrich PA,
1773–1778.
graphic findings in 16 patients. Radiology Verschakelen JA, Henderson WR Jr. Swyer-
1994;191(3):665–668. 138. Müller NL, Ooi GC, Khong PL, Nicolaou S. James syndrome: CT findings in eight pa-
Severe acute respiratory syndrome: radio- tients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1992;158(6):
126. Ketai LH, Kelsey CA, Jordan K, et al. Distin-
graphic and CT findings. AJR Am J Roent- 1211–1215.
guishing Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome
genol 2003;181(1):3–8.
from acute respiratory distress syndrome 152. Bruno B, Gooley T, Hackman RC, Davis C,
by chest radiography: are there different 139. Wong KT, Antonio GE, Hui DS, et al. Thin- Corey L, Boeckh M. Adenovirus infection
radiographic manifestations of increased section CT of severe acute respiratory syn- in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation:
alveolar permeability? J Thorac Imaging drome: evaluation of 73 patients exposed to effect of ganciclovir and impact on survival.
1998;13(3):172–177. or with the disease. Radiology 2003;228(2): Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2003;9(5):
395–400. 341–352.
127. Boroja M, Barrie JR, Raymond GS. Radio-
graphic findings in 20 patients with Hanta- 140. Ooi GC, Khong PL, Müller NL, et al. Severe 153. Ohori NP, Michaels MG, Jaffe R, Williams P,
virus pulmonary syndrome correlated with acute respiratory syndrome: temporal lung Yousem SA. Adenovirus pneumonia in lung
clinical outcome. AJR Am J Roentgenol changes at thin-section CT in 30 patients. transplant recipients. Hum Pathol 1995;
2002;178(1):159–163. Radiology 2004;230(3):836–844. 26(10):1073–1079.
154. Motallebi M, Mukunda BN, Ravakhah K. 167. Razonable RR, Emery VC; 11th Annual man. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1979;132(5):
Adenoviral bronchopneumonia in an im- Meeting of the IHMF (International Herpes 820–822.
munocompetent adult: computed tomogra- Management Forum). Management of CMV
180. Falsey AR, Walsh EE. Viral pneumonia in
phy and pathologic correlations. Am J Med infection and disease in transplant patients.
older adults. Clin Infect Dis 2006;42(4):
Sci 2003;325(5):285–287. 27–29 February 2004. Herpes 2004;11(3):
518–524.
77–86.
155. Chiu CY, Wong KS, Huang YC, Lin TY. Bron-
181 . Camps Serra M, Cervera C, Pumarola T,
chiolitis obliterans in children: clinical pre- 168. Thorne LB, Civalier C, Booker J, Fan H,
et al. Virological diagnosis in community-
sentation, therapy and long-term follow-up. Gulley ML. Analytic validation of a quanti-
acquired pneumonia in immunocompro-
J Paediatr Child Health 2008;44(3):129–133. tative real-time PCR assay to measure CMV
mised patients. Eur Respir J 2008;31(3):
viral load in whole blood. Diagn Mol Pathol
156. Luyt CE, Combes A, Nieszkowska A, 618–624.
2007;16(2):73–80.
Trouillet JL, Chastre J. Viral infections in 182. Lau SK, To WK, Tse PW, et al. Human
the ICU. Curr Opin Crit Care 2008;14(5): 169. Bonatti H, Pruett TL, Brandacher G, et al.
parainfluenza virus 4 outbreak and the
605–608. Pneumonia in solid organ recipients: spec-
role of diagnostic tests. J Clin Microbiol
trum of pathogens in 217 episodes. Trans-
2005;43(9):4515–4521.
157. Umans U, Golding RP, Duraku S, Manoliu RA. plant Proc 2009;41(1):371–374.
Herpes simplex virus 1 pneumonia: con- 183. González Y, Martino R, Rabella N, Labeaga R,
ventional chest radiograph pattern. Eur 170. Nomura F, Shimokata K, Sakai S, Yamauchi
Badell I, Sierra J. Community respiratory
Radiol 2001;11(6):990–994. T, Kodera Y, Saito H. Cytomegalovirus pneu-
virus infections in patients with hematologic
monitis occurring after allogeneic bone
malignancies. Haematologica 1999;84(9):
158. Ramsey PG, Fife KH, Hackman RC, Meyers marrow transplantation: a study of 106 re-
820–823.
JD, Corey L. Herpes simplex virus pneu- cipients. Jpn J Med 1990;29(6):595–602.
monia: clinical, virologic, and pathologic 184. Wendt CH. Community respiratory viruses:
features in 20 patients. Ann Intern Med 171 . Moon JH, Kim EA, Lee KS, Kim TS, Jung organ transplant recipients. Am J Med
1982;97(6):813–820. KJ, Song JH. Cytomegalovirus pneumonia: 1997;102(3A):31–36, discussion 42–43.
high-resolution CT findings in ten non-AIDS
159. Gasparetto EL, Escuissato DL, Inoue C, immunocompromised patients. Korean J 185. Castagnola E, Cappelli B, Erba D, Rabagliati
Marchiori E, Müller NL. Herpes simplex Radiol 2000;1(2):73–78. A, Lanino E, Dini G. Cytomegalovirus in-
virus type 2 pneumonia after bone marrow fection after bone marrow transplanta-
172. Franquet T, Lee KS, Müller NL. Thin-section tion in children. Hum Immunol 2004;65(5):
transplantation: high-resolution CT findings
CT findings in 32 immunocompromised pa- 416–422.
in 3 patients. J Thorac Imaging 2005;20(2):
tients with cytomegalovirus pneumonia who
71–73.
do not have AIDS. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186. Konoplev S, Champlin RE, Giralt S, et al.
160. Frangides CY, Pneumatikos I. Varicella- 2003;181(4):1059–1063. Cytomegalovirus pneumonia in adult autolo-
zoster virus pneumonia in adults: report of gous blood and marrow transplant recipi-
173. McGuinness G, Scholes JV, Garay SM, ents. Bone Marrow Transplant 2001;27(8):
14 cases and review of the literature. Eur J
Leitman BS, McCauley DI, Naidich DP. 877–881.
Intern Med 2004;15(6):364–370.
Cytomegalovirus pneumonitis: spectrum of
161 . Popara M, Pendle S, Sacks L, Smego RA Jr, parenchymal CT findings with pathologic 187. Chang GC, Wu CL, Pan SH, et al. The di-
Mer M. Varicella pneumonia in patients correlation in 21 AIDS patients. Radiology agnosis of pneumonia in renal transplant
with HIV/AIDS. Int J Infect Dis 2002;6(1): 1994;192(2):451–459. recipients using invasive and noninvasive
6–8. procedures. Chest 2004;125(2):541–547.
174. Gautschi O, Berger C, Gubler J, Laube I.
Acute respiratory failure and cerebral hem- 188. Aisenberg GM, Torres HA, Tarrand J, Safdar
162. Kim JS, Ryu CW, Lee SI, Sung DW, Park
orrhage due to primary Epstein-Barr virus A, Bodey G, Chemaly RF. Herpes simplex
CK. High-resolution CT findings of varicella-
infection. Respiration 2003;70(4):419–422. virus lower respiratory tract infection in
zoster pneumonia. AJR Am J Roentgenol
patients with solid tumors. Cancer 2009;
1999;172(1):113–116. 175. Teira P, Agbalika F, Bergeron A, et al. Primary 115(1):199–206.
163. Maher TM, Gupta NK, Burke MM, Carby Epstein-Barr virus infection with pneumonia
transmitted by allogeneic bone marrow 189. Whimbey E, Champlin RE, Couch RB, et al.
MR. CT findings of varicella pneumonia
after transplantation. Clin Infect Dis 2006; Community respiratory virus infections
after lung transplantation. AJR Am J Roent-
43(7):892–895. among hospitalized adult bone marrow
genol 2007;188(6):W557–W559.
transplant recipients. Clin Infect Dis 1996;
176. Kutok JL, Wang F. Spectrum of Epstein- 22(5):778–782.
164. Gasparetto EL, Ono SE, Escuissato D, et al.
Barr virus–associated diseases. Annu Rev
Cytomegalovirus pneumonia after bone mar- 190. Thompson WW, Comanor L, Shay DK.
Pathol 2006;1:375–404.
row transplantation: high-resolution CT find- Epidemiology of seasonal influenza: use of
ings. Br J Radiol 2004;77(921):724–727. 177. Kramer SS, Wehunt WD, Stocker JT, surveillance data and statistical models to
Kashima H. Pulmonary manifestations of estimate the burden of disease. J Infect Dis
165. Kang EY, Patz EF Jr, Müller NL. Cytomeg-
juvenile laryngotracheal papillomatosis. AJR 2006;194(suppl 2):S82–S91.
alovirus pneumonia in transplant patients:
Am J Roentgenol 1985;144(4):687–694.
CT findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1996; 191 . Bowton DL, Bass DA. Community-acquired
20(2):295–299. 178. Zawadzka-Głos L, Jakubowska A, Chmielik M, pneumonia: the clinical dilemma. J Thorac
Bielicka A, Brzewski M. Lower airway pap- Imaging 1991;6(3):1–5.
166. Worthy SA, Flint JD, Müller NL. Pulmo-
illomatosis in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhi-
nary complications after bone marrow 192. Jennings LC, Anderson TP, Beynon KA,
nolaryngol 2003;67(10):1117–1121.
transplantation: high-resolution CT and et al. Incidence and characteristics of viral
pathologic findings. RadioGraphics 1997; 179. Glazer G, Webb WR. Laryngeal papilloma- community-acquired pneumonia in adults.
17(6):1359–1371. tosis with pulmonary spread in a 69-year-old Thorax 2008;63(1):42–48.
193. Mandell LA, Bartlett JG, Dowell SF, et al. 206. Crowe JE Jr. Human metapneumovirus as 221. Hogg JC. Infection and COPD. Exp Lung
Update of practice guidelines for the man- a major cause of human respiratory tract dis- Res 2005;31(suppl 1):72–73.
agement of community-acquired pneumonia ease. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2004;23(11 suppl): 222. Papi A, Bellettato CM, Braccioni F, et al.
in immunocompetent adults. Clin Infect Dis S215–S221. Infections and airway inflammation in chronic
2003;37(11):1405–1433. obstructive pulmonary disease severe ex-
207. Coker R. Swine flu. BMJ 2009;338:b1791.
194. Shapiro JM, Jean RE. Respiratory syncytial acerbations. Am J Respir Crit Care Med
208. Cohen J. Swine flu outbreak: past pandemics
virus. N Engl J Med 2001;345(15):1132–1133. 2006;173(10):1114–1121.
provide mixed clues to H1N1’s next moves.
195. Falsey AR, Walsh EE. Respiratory syncytial Science 2009;324(5930):996–997. 223. Falsey AR, Hennessey PA, Formica MA,
virus infection in adults. Clin Microbiol Rev Cox C, Walsh EE. Respiratory syncytial
209. Beckford-Ball J. Swine flu panic shows how virus infection in elderly and high-risk adults.
2000;13(3):371–384.
little we really care. Br J Nurs 2009;18(9): N Engl J Med 2005;352(17):1749–1759.
196. Schlesinger C, Koss MN. Bronchiolitis: 521.
update 2001. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2002; 224. Seemungal TA, Wedzicha JA. Viral infec-
210 . Greenberg SB. Viral pneumonia. Infect Dis tions in obstructive airway diseases. Curr
8(2):112–116.
Clin North Am 1991;5(3):603–621. Opin Pulm Med 2003;9(2):111–116.
197. Angeles Marcos M, Camps M, Pumarola T,
211 . Macfarlane J, Holmes W, Gard P, et al. 225. Smith CB, Golden CA, Kanner RE, Renzetti
et al. The role of viruses in the aetiology of
Prospective study of the incidence, aetiol- AD Jr. Association of viral and Myco-
community-acquired pneumonia in adults.
ogy and outcome of adult lower respiratory plasma pneumoniae infections with acute
Antivir Ther 2006;11(3):351–359.
tract illness in the community. Thorax 2001; respiratory illness in patients with chronic
198. Mandell LA, Wunderink RG, Anzueto A, et al. 56(2):109–114. obstructive pulmonary diseases. Am Rev
Infectious Diseases Society of America/ Respir Dis 1980;121(2):225–232.
212 . Creer DD, Dilworth JP, Gillespie SH, et al.
American Thoracic Society consensus guide-
Aetiological role of viral and bacterial in- 226. Beckham JD, Cadena A, Lin J, et al. Re-
lines on the management of community-
fections in acute adult lower respiratory spiratory viral infections in patients with
acquired pneumonia in adults. Clin Infect Dis
tract infection (LRTI) in primary care. Tho- chronic, obstructive pulmonary disease.
2007;44(suppl 2):S27–S72.
rax 2006;61(1):75–79. J Infect 2005;50(4):322–330.
199. Bouza E, Muñoz P. Introduction: infections 227. Woodhead M, Blasi F, Ewig S, et al. Guide-
213. Johnstone J, Majumdar SR, Fox JD, Marrie
caused by emerging resistant pathogens. lines for the management of adult lower
TJ. Viral infection in adults hospitalized
Clin Microbiol Infect 2005;11(suppl 4):iv. respiratory tract infections. Eur Respir J
with community-acquired pneumonia: prev-
200. Schwartz DA, Bryan RT, Hughes JM. Pathol- alence, pathogens, and presentation. Chest 2005;26(6):1138–1180.
ogy and emerging infections—quo vadimus? 2008;134(6):1141–1148. 228. Mallia P, Johnston SL. How viral infections
Am J Pathol 1995;147(6):1525–1533. cause exacerbation of airway diseases. Chest
214. Gern JE. Viral respiratory infection and
201 . Cheney PR. Update on emerging infections the link to asthma. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2006;130(4):1203–1210.
from the Centers for Disease Control and Pre- 2008;27(10 suppl):S97–S103. 229. Carroll KN, Hartert TV. The impact of re-
vention. Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome— spiratory viral infection on wheezing ill-
215. Falsey AR. Respiratory syncytial virus in-
Colorado and New Mexico, 1998. Ann nesses and asthma exacerbations. Immu-
fection in adults. Semin Respir Crit Care
Emerg Med 1999;33(1):121–123. nol Allergy Clin North Am 2008;28(3):
Med 2007;28(2):171–181.
539–561, viii.
202. Hammel JM, Chiang WK. Update on emerg-
216. Manoha C, Espinosa S, Aho SL, Huet F,
ing infections: news from the Centers for 230. Jartti T, Lee WM, Pappas T, Evans M,
Pothier P. Epidemiological and clinical fea-
Disease Control and Prevention. Outbreaks Lemanske RF Jr, Gern JE. Serial viral in-
tures of hMPV, RSV and RVs infections in
of avian influenza A (H5N1) in Asia and fections in infants with recurrent respiratory
young children. J Clin Virol 2007;38(3):
interim recommendations for evaluation illnesses. Eur Respir J 2008;32(2):314–320.
221–226.
and reporting of suspected cases—United 231. Bardin PG, Johnston SL, Pattemore PK.
States, 2004. Ann Emerg Med 2005;45(1): 217. Lim WS, Macfarlane JT, Colthorpe CL. Viruses as precipitants of asthma symp-
88–92. Treatment of community-acquired lower re- toms. II. Physiology and mechanisms. Clin
spiratory tract infections during pregnancy. Exp Allergy 1992;22(9):809–822.
203. Cameron PA, Rainer TH. Update on emerg-
Am J Respir Med 2003;2(3):221–233.
ing infections: news from the Centers for 232. Beadling C, Slifka MK. How do viral infec-
Disease Control and Prevention. Update: out- 218. Kumar D, Erdman D, Keshavjee S, et al. tions predispose patients to bacterial infec-
break of severe acute respiratory syndrome— Clinical impact of community-acquired re- tions? Curr Opin Infect Dis 2004;17(3):
worldwide, 2003. Ann Emerg Med 2003; spiratory viruses on bronchiolitis obliter- 185–191.
42(1):110–112. ans after lung transplant. Am J Transplant
233. Corne JM, Marshall C, Smith S, et al. Fre-
2005;5(8):2031–2036.
204. Hamelin ME, Abed Y, Boivin G. Human quency, severity, and duration of rhinovirus
metapneumovirus: a new player among re- 219. Palmer SM Jr, Henshaw NG, Howell DN, infections in asthmatic and non-asthmatic
spiratory viruses. Clin Infect Dis 2004;38(7): Miller SE, Davis RD, Tapson VF. Commu- individuals: a longitudinal cohort study.
983–990. nity respiratory viral infection in adult lung Lancet 2002;359(9309):831–834.
transplant recipients. Chest 1998;113(4):
205. Madhi SA, Ludewick H, Abed Y, Klugman 234. Kim YJ, Boeckh M, Englund JA. Commu-
944–950.
KP, Boivin G. Human metapneumovirus- nity respiratory virus infections in immu-
associated lower respiratory tract infections 220. Hopkins P, McNeil K, Kermeen F, et al. nocompromised patients: hematopoietic
among hospitalized human immunodefi- Human metapneumovirus in lung transplant stem cell and solid organ transplant recipi-
ciency virus type 1 (HIV-1)–infected and recipients and comparison to respiratory ents, and individuals with human immuno-
HIV-1-uninfected African infants. Clin In- syncytial virus. Am J Respir Crit Care Med deficiency virus infection. Semin Respir Crit
fect Dis 2003;37(12):1705–1710. 2008;178(8):876–881. Care Med 2007;28(2):222–242.
235. Hwang EA, Kang MJ, Han SY, Park SB, 242. Lyu DM, Zamora MR. Medical complications the status quo. Clin Transplant 2007;21(2):
Kim HC. Viral infection following kidney of lung transplantation. Proc Am Thorac 149–158.
transplantation: long-term follow-up in a Soc 2009;6(1):101–107.
single center. Transplant Proc 2004;36(7): 250. Saner FH, Olde Damink SW, Pavlakovic G,
243. López-Medrano F, Aguado JM, Lizasoain M, et al. Pulmonary and blood stream infec-
2118–2119.
et al. Clinical implications of respiratory tions in adult living donor and cadaveric
236. Ljungman P. Respiratory virus infections in virus infections in solid organ transplant liver transplant patients. Transplantation
stem cell transplant patients: the European recipients: a prospective study. Transplan- 2008;85(11):1564–1568.
experience. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant tation 2007;84(7):851–856.
2001;7(suppl):5S–7S. 251. Zhang XD, Hu XP, Yin H, et al. Aspergillus
244. Mattner F, Fischer S, Weissbrodt H, et al.
pneumonia in renal transplant recipients.
Post-operative nosocomial infections after
237. Matar LD, McAdams HP, Palmer SM, et al. Chin Med J (Engl) 2008;121(9):791–794.
lung and heart transplantation. J Heart
Respiratory viral infections in lung trans-
Lung Transplant 2007;26(3):241–249. 252. Whimbey E, Ghosh S. Respiratory syncytial
plant recipients: radiologic findings with clin-
ical correlation. Radiology 1999;213(3): 245. Puzio J, Kucewicz E, Sioła M, et al. Atypi- virus infections in immunocompromised
735–742. cal and opportunistic pulmonary infections adults. Curr Clin Top Infect Dis 2000;20:
after cardiac surgery [in Polish]. Anestezjol 232–255.
238. Leung AN, Gosselin MV, Napper CH, et al. Intens Ter 2009;41(1):41–45.
Pulmonary infections after bone marrow 253. Flomenberg P, Babbitt J, Drobyski WR,
transplantation: clinical and radiographic 246. Campos S, Caramori M, Teixeira R, et al. et al. Increasing incidence of adenovirus
findings. Radiology 1999;210(3):699–710. Bacterial and fungal pneumonias after lung disease in bone marrow transplant recipi-
transplantation. Transplant Proc 2008;40(3): ents. J Infect Dis 1994;169(4):775–781.
239. Ison MG, Fishman JA. Cytomegalovirus 822–824.
pneumonia in transplant recipients. Clin 254. Rañó A, Agustí C, Jimenez P, et al. Pulmo-
247. Puchhammer-Stöckl E. Herpesviruses and nary infiltrates in non-HIV immunocom-
Chest Med 2005;26(4):691–705, viii.
the transplanted lung: looking at the air promised patients: a diagnostic approach
240. Bozbas SS, Eyuboglu FO, Ozturk Ergur F, side. J Clin Virol 2008;43(4):415–418. using non-invasive and bronchoscopic pro-
et al. Pulmonary complications and mortality 248. Sund F, Lidehäll AK, Claesson K, et al. CMV- cedures. Thorax 2001;56(5):379–387.
after liver transplant. Exp Clin Transplant specific T-cell immunity, viral load, and
2008;6(4):264–270. 255. Templeton KE, Scheltinga SA, van den
clinical outcome in seropositive renal trans-
Eeden WC, Graffelman AW, van den Broek
plant recipients: a pilot study. Clin Trans-
241. Ng YL, Paul N, Patsios D, et al. Imaging of PJ, Claas EC. Improved diagnosis of the
plant 2010;24(3):401–409.
lung transplantation: review. AJR Am J etiology of community-acquired pneumonia
Roentgenol 2009;192(3 suppl):S1–S13; quiz 249. Fishman JA, Emery V, Freeman R, et al. Cyto- with real-time polymerase chain reaction.
S14–S19. megalovirus in transplantation—challenging Clin Infect Dis 2005;41(3):345–351.