BRAVO ‘SAUSAGE CUTTER INOTEC. WTO05R ID Hazard Type Asset Hazard Register GRAYSONLINE ‘As at September 13,2013 Auction Venue: SALE 3003518 Lot number; LOT 89 Sale Date: Hazard Description 1 Plent Operation 2 Plant Operation 3 Noise 4 Electrical 5 Signage 6 Contois 7 Signage 8 PlantOperation 9 Guarding 10 Plant Structure NEEDS OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS AFFDED IN VEW OF OPERATOR NO SERVICE OR MAINTENANCE RECORDS AVAILABLE ‘SOUND PRESSURE LEVEL (SPL) NEEDS TESTING AT OPERATOR STATION. IF SPL GREATER THAN 8568(A), CLEAR & VISIBLE WARNINGS MUST BE ATTACHED re: USE OF HEARING PROTECTION NEEDS TO BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH EARTH LEAKAGE CIRCUIT BREAKER (ELCB) NEEDS HAZARD WARNING SIGN ATTACHED RE USE OF HEARING PROTECTION OPERATOR CONTROLS NEED CLEAR IDENTIFICATION & LABELLING HAZARD WARNING SIGN RE " KEEP HANDS CLEAR OF IMPACTICUTTING AREA" TOBE ATTACHED ENSURE ONLY TRAINED & COMPETENT PERSONNEL HAVE ACCESS TO THE PLANT MOVING PARTS OF THE PLANT MAY ENTRAP OR CUT BODY PARTS. ALL FIXED AND OPENABLE GUARDS MUST BE REPLACED AFTER MAINTENANCE/CLEANING ACTIMTIES. GUARDING SHOULD BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH A$4024.1: SAFEGUARDING OF MACHINERY. ENSURE THAT DISMANTLING, TRANSPORT AND STOWING IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH MANUFACTURER'S, Page £0 of 73 1210072013, Hazard RegisterBRAVO 11 Electrical 12 Controls 18. Plant Operaton 14 Plant Maintenance 18 Plent Structure Asset Hazard Register GRAYSONLINE As at Soptomber 13,2013, INSTRUCTIONS, PLANT TO BE REGULARLY INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED AS PER ASINZS3760: INSERVICE SAFETY INSPECTION AND TESTING OF ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT, AS/NZS3000: WIRING RULES AND OR AS1543: ELECTRICA. EQUIPMENT OF INDUSTRIAL MACHINES CONDUCT AND DOCUMENT REGULAR INSPECTIONS OF THE PLANT (INCL. SAFETY EQUIPMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLANT) RELEASE OF STORE ENERGY DUE TO MALFUNCTION AND OR DAMAGE TO THE PLANT PLANT POWERED MOTIONS NEED TO BE ISOLATED AND DE-ENERGISED PRIOR TO REMOVING ANY FIXED. (GUARDING DURING MANTENANCE ACTMTIES, ENSURE PLANT IS MOUNTEDIFIXED ON STABLE/FIRM GROUND TO PREVENT IT FROM TOLPPING OVER. Page 51 of 72 0072013 Hazard RegisterHazard Register graysonine Occupational Health and Safety Plant Safety Purchaser Information This plant health and safety information has been prepared by Graysonline for the purchaser of the plant item as required by National and State OHS Legislation. Whilst every effort has been made to identify all of the hazards, it should be recognised that such hazards have been identified given due consideration to the state of knowledge of the plant item IF this plant item is being purchased for use at a place of work, the purchaser is reminded of their obligations to review the hazard register and in consultation with employees, prepare a formal risk assessment for the operation of the plant item in the new environment. In order to assess the risk, itis necessary to consider the likelihood of an incident that would impact (consequence) on health and safety at the workplace. The following guidelines are provided to assist the purchaser to complete the plant assessment. Likelihood Consequence ‘* Frequency and duration of exposure ‘Assume “worst case” injury, but also competent follow-up medical and rehabilitation of occurrence of hazard or event (including | support 5 a z 5 g 2 & g ° g 2 & g e energy levels, highest belt tensions, size of gears, pulleys or other to avoi the damage, | entrapment points and therefore body parts likely to be injured impact or harm * Consider sharpness of entrapment 's, surrounding parts likely to exacerbate + Reliability and effectiveness of existing / established | injury, and any give in the entrapment point systems of control * Consider, will entrapment continue until plant is stopped, or can an injured part travel through the entrapment area © Are temperatures of plant, or chemicals, likely to further injure entrapped person ‘The outcome of the risk assessment is 2 prioritised list of risks and risk controls (existing and proposed) for further action based on the following risk ratings: Low risk- may be considered acceptable, where the existing controls in place are seen to be effective, requiring periodic monitoring for effectiveness. Medium risk- considered to be unacceptable and requiring additional risk controls within medium to long term. High risk - considered to be unacceptable and requiring action within the short to medium term Extreme risk — unacceptable, where immediate action required these cases employees/operators must be made aware of the risk controls in place to protect them from the hazards.