Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Quality Assurance PDF
Quality Assurance PDF
Quadrant 1 – E-Text
Learning Objectives
The word quality has multiple meanings. Two of those meanings are critical, not only to quality
planning, but to strategic business planning as well. They are, ‘product performance ‘ and ‘
freedom from deficiencies '. In the sense of performance, quality refers to the performance
features of a product. Such features are decisive regarding product performance and product
satisfaction. They compete with each other in the market place.
External customers, especially ultimate users, compare competing performances. Their
comparisons then become a factor in deciding whose product will be bought. Due to the
competition in the market place, a primary goal for product performance is to be equal or
superior to the quality of competing products. The word quality also refers to freedom from
deficiencies, which takes many forms, such as late deliveries, customer claims and returns, high
rate of rework and even cancellation of sales. These are collectively forms of product
dissatisfaction.
Some deficiencies impact external customers and hence, are a threat to future sales as well as a
source of higher costs. Other deficiencies impact only customers and hence, are mainly a source
of higher costs. For quality in the sense of freedom from deficiencies, the long-range goal is
perfection.
Quality is Prevention
Constructing solutions to problems before they occur and designing excellence into a product or
service.
Quality is Customer Satisfaction
It is the delight of the ultimate judge of how well products and services measure up.
Quality is Productivity
Quality is Productivity from employees who receive training, tools and instruction they need to
execute their jobs.
Quality is Flexibility
It is the willingness to change to meet demands.
Quality is Efficiency
It is doing things quickly and correctly.
Quality is Meeting
It is a schedule being on time.
Quality is a Process
It is the process of on-going improvement.
Quality is an Investment
Because reaping a payoff in the long run, doing it right the first time is less expensive than
correcting it later.
7.2 Making Quality Measurable
Many companies require regular reports, but take no action to bring about improvements as a
result of those reports. A heavy focus is placed on measuring systems and methods, instead of
results and possible improvements. Measuring a process without improving it leads to increased
costs and lower product quality. 46% of all new product development costs are due to failures,
because measurements are not monitored and effective solutions not planned.
What gets measured gets managed. Conduct of the quality function depends heavily on the
quantification of the product and process characteristics. The process of quantification is called
measurement. The measurement results are dependent on the standards being used. Improvement
occurs when the measured results are monitored and compared against standards, resulting in
actions.
The measurement of current performance is essential for continuous quality improvement. What
cannot be measured cannot be improved. There is no end to quality improvement processes when
results are continuously monitored. Companies measure sales, profits, growth and other
parameters to satisfy stakeholders. It is better to monitor the process that provides these results,
rather than measure the results alone. Results will follow when input is controlled and the
process is monitored.
Controlling Quality
An effective control system is required to ensure that the whole product stream meets
specifications, with only a tolerable amount of exception. Most companies follow the three-tyre
system of quality checking. The best results have been found to be achieved with the system
which has three component activities, linked by a management report. They are: In-process
sampling, 100% examination and quality audit.
Quality Assurance
Quality assurance refers to the assurance to customers that the product, parts, components and
tools contain specified characteristics and is fit for the intended use. In today’s competitive
industrial world, no business unit can exist for a long time without adhering to quality. Now the
assurance of quality is not the responsibility of a senior person or a department only. Only the
inspection department or its personnel cannot be held responsible for assurance of quality. It is
the responsibility of everybody connected with production, directly or indirectly and each
department.
The main objectives of quality control are: to identify and mark fabric faults on the fabric, to
decide to cut the fabric lot or not, to increase productivity of the cutting department.
Quality first products require quality piece goods. Even the most outstanding manufacturing
methods cannot compensate for defective materials. You can use these recommendations to help
create an aggressive piece goods quality control programme, and eliminate many quality
problems before the manufacturing process begins.
The fabric store should always inspect the fabric as soon as it reaches the facility.
Always store the fabric in a clean, moisture free environment.
As soon as the fabric arrives, a swatch, (of dimensions as specified by the laboratory),
should be submitted to a laboratory, to check the fabric for adherence to fabric
performance standards that are required.
Many companies prefer to undertake fabric checking while spreading, though at ABC Garments,
the fabric is checked beforehand as a separate operation. This is because, while spreading, a
spreader is concerned primarily with spreading the fabric and not to inspect the quality of the
fabric.
Roll Size
For better utilisation of fabric, it is suggested that there should not be more than 10-15% of
“short rolls” that is rolls of 20 meters and less in an order.
Selection of Rolls
At least one roll of each colour that is even if it exceeds 10% of the total meterage, should be
selected.
In case, more than one roll per colour is to be checked, then select the number in proportion to
the number of total rolls per colour received.
A maximum of 4 points is charged to one linear meter. Defects less than 1” from the selvedge of
the fabric will not be counted. Only major defects are considered.
Major Defect
A defect that, if conspicuous on the finished product, would cause the item to be a ‘second’.
Note: When inspecting piece goods prior to cutting, it is necessary to rate questionable defects
as major, since the Inspector will not know where the defect may occur on the item.
Minor Defect
A defect that would not cause the product to be termed a second either because of severity or
location. No penalty points are recorded for minor defects.
_______________________________________________
Inspection Guidelines
In Case of a Marker
Always compare the marker with the original pattern.
Marker Making
Ensure that all parts of a particular garment appear on the marker. Check for the smaller parts
[collars/cuffs] and their presence in pairs.
Marker Placement
To check that the marker is placed on the spread and the edge is parallel to the selvedge of the
piece goods. Ensure that all cut pieces are complete.
Table Marks
Check the table for all table marks. Allow no minus tolerance for splicing [a minimum of one
inch of overlap].
Markers
Ensure that the marker is not creased, damaged or has overlapped parts.
Marker Blueprint
Make a random check of some measurements in the marker. Sometimes, while making a
blueprint of the marker, unknowingly, the marker gets pulled. This distorts the sizes.
Spread Height
Ensure that the height of the spread is at least two inches less than the cutting blade knife. In case
of knits, ensure that the ply height is stable.
Narrow Goods
After completion of the spread, check the far edges of the spread to see that all piles extend
beyond the marker line.
Leaning
Check carefully to ensure that one edge of the fabric is square to the table top. Visually inspect to
ensure the alignment to the edge with the table top.
Count
Check the count after completion of spreading, and before cutting. Count all plies at both ends.
There should be no tolerance.
Inspection Guidelines
When inspecting: Always try and inspect without disturbing the cut block. This is essential in
case the particular piece has to be re-cut. Do not disturb the order of the cut pieces as they have
not yet been numbered.
For the purpose of inspection, the parts chosen for size ‘M’ would be Fronts, back and Sleeves
for the Straight Knife and Placket, Yoke half-moon, Cuffs for the Band Knife.
In case all garment parts are cut on one type of cutting machine, the parts selected should be a
combination of both the big and small parts. In case, there are a lot of measurement problems
observed in the sewing room, it is advisable that all garment parts be checked in the cutting
room.
Defect Classification
Miscuts
Check for miscuts or for the failure of the cutter to “split the line”. Tolerance is +/- 1/16”.
Ragged Cutting
This is a judgment defect. For certain parts such as pockets and collars, ragged cutting can be a
critical problem, whereas, for some parts like the front the defect would be less severe in case the
ragged edges are not too severe.
Notches
The notch location should be checked by placing the pattern over the top ply. Tolerance is +/-
1/8”.
Check Pattern
Compare the pattern to the marker to ensure that the marker was correct.
Slant Knife
Check the top and last ply for slant knife. This occurs while cutting when the knife blade tilts and
results in a difference in sizes throughout the ply height.
Measurement Checks
Tolerance for: Straight Knife - 3 mm, Band Knife - 2 mm, Dye-cuts - 1 mm.
1. In-process sampling
2. 100% Inspection
3. Quality Audit
In Process Sampling
Sampling is more economical and feasible than checking everything. A proper sampling system
can give results that are closely representative of the actual situation. Attention can also be
focussed on areas where defects are being produced. The objectives of in-process sampling are,
maintaining a steady and tight control over all operators, and concentrating attention where poor
quality is being produced.
Inspection Guidelines
The “Inspector” should be a person not directly responsible for production.
The Inspector should have adequate knowledge of the garment being produced in terms of
tolerances, stitching details, workmanship quality that is required and manufacturing standards
for the garment.
This information should be available to the operator at their workstation where it is easy to read.
It should be legible, that is it should be neat and if required in the local language. It is the
responsibility of the supervisor that each operator understands his or her specification clearly,
before production starts.
Depending on the results of the check, the whole bundle is accepted as being of satisfactory
quality or rejected as being unsatisfactory. The rules, which decide what constitutes a
satisfactory or unsatisfactory bundle, are laid down as part of the factory’s system. Accepted
bundles should proceed to the next operation while the rejected bundles are passed to the
supervisor for action.
When the operator has been cleared he or she is not checked again, until her name comes up in
the normal random sampling procedure. In this way, the Inspector keeps checking a operator
whose quality is bad, while still going around the factory checking other operators. Of course,
neither the Inspector nor the Supervisor is expected to calmly allow an operator to remain
“uncleared for quality” for long. The supervisor will speak to the operator on the first rejection,
and should take urgent action after a second rejection to find out what is wrong, and cure it.
An important point of this system is that at no time does the Inspector return the work directly to
the operator; only the supervisor returns work for repair. The operator is responsible for that
particular section and should review all work that is being returned. The operator will then judge
the reason for the defect and take appropriate action, dealing with operator, machine or cut work.
The ideal situation is where the supervisor feels that the Inspector is there to help her, by finding
quality problems for her before they become serious. This attitude must be introduced from the
start when installing a sampling system. The supervisor should be educated to see the Inspector
as a helper, an extra pair of eyes, not someone there to create trouble. Unless the supervisors and
Inspectors co-operate, the system will not work.
Apart from this relationship with the supervisor, the Inspector must be able to understand what is
being looked for. The Inspector should also interpret quality specifications and have sufficient
confidence in her own judgement to insist that a mistake is a mistake, even when the supervisor
says “That’s not too bad, it can go on.”
Parameters
There are 4 parameters that need to be defined before starting in-process sampling.
LOT
Example: 1 bundle.
SAMPLE SIZE
The number of garments / parts to be taken for inspection from the lot.
Example: 6 garments from one bundle of 25 pieces.
ACCEPTANCE NUMBER
The number of faulty garments / parts that a sample may have without the entire lot being
rejected.
Example: 0 out of 6. If there is even 1 defective piece in the sample the entire lot will be
rejected.
CLEARANCE NUMBER
The number of lots that must be accepted in succession to take the operator out of the clearance
procedure.
Example: 1 lot.
For economic reasons, there should be as few examination points as possible. On the other hand,
for easy repairs, examination points should be placed before any operation which oversees an
earlier one. To reconcile these opposing objectives, it should be considered how many defects
are actually being produced by each operation, how many are found at the examination point and
whether or not these defects will be visible in the finished garment. The usual position for in-line
examination points is after a critical component has been made, before attaching it to the main
garment. For example, after ‘making a shirt collar’.
Inspection Guidelines
The Inspector should be trained to inspect. This implies that there should be a pre-defined set of
actions that is undertaken, to examine each garment or part for visual, measurement and
workmanship.
Examination tends to be a boring job and any Inspector can become ‘mesmerised’ after a while
and simply not see what is being looked at. To help avoid this, an operation description must be
written for this job, detailing how the Inspector should check the garment. The Inspector should
be positioned within the line, similar to a sewing operation.
The Inspector
The Inspector should have a workstation that is adequately large to handle the garment part that
is to be checked, as well as the reports, and other work aids that are required to carry out the
inspection.
The Inspector should have adequate authority not to send a bundle to the next operation in case
faults are found. Under no circumstance should an inspector be harassed by the operator to pass
on the bundle, just because the production target for the day has to be met.
Quality Audit
Quality audit is an examination of a small number of garments from the finished stock from
sewing.
These are taken as representative of the quality that is going to the finishing room. All end-line
checkers are audited individually, 4 times a day to ensure control on the checking efficiency of
end-line checkers. The objectives of a quality audit are to: Check the other parts of the system,
obtain figures which can be compared with figures of in-process sampling, and final inspection,
giving comparisons of the effectiveness of the above two systems, look at the garment from the
customer’s viewpoint and analyze results.
Inspection Guidelines
The Auditor for the Sewing floor should be a qualified and experienced Quality Controller, and
should be able to check a garment thoroughly as per buyer’s specifications. The Auditor should
himself randomly pick up the garments from each checker’s passed pieces. These pieces should
not be given to him by the supervisor or any other personnel. He should audit each checker at
least 4 times a day, in order to get a representative checking efficiency of the checker.
It is recommended that 100% inspection and an audit be carried out either after washing or
finishing. In case, the wash process is rigorous or a special wash is being done, it is advisable to
check all garments after washing. It is recommended that the garments be slightly ironed and
then inspected. The main objective of a 100% inspection is to identify defects that occur after
washing.
Inspection Guidelines
When inspecting, emphasis should be on those areas that are affected by washing, such as button
attachment and fraying of collars. The inspection could be combined with thread trimming in
case of normal washes. It is recommended that the garments be ironed lightly before inspection.
This eases out the creases from the garment and aids the inspectors in identifying defects.
The main objectives of the Finishing Quality Audits are, to check the other parts of the system
and to obtain figures which can be compared with figures of 100% final inspection. This will
give comparisons of the effectiveness of the above system. Finally, it allows an inspection to be
done from the customer’s viewpoint and to analyze results.
Inspection Guidelines
The Auditor for the Checkers audit should be a qualified and experienced Quality Controller, and
should be able to check a garment thoroughly as per the buyer’s specifications.
The Auditor should himself randomly pick up the garments from each checker’s passed pieces.
These pieces should not be given to him by the supervisor or any other personnel. He should do
and audit of each checker at least 4 times a day in order to get a representative checking
efficiency of the checker.
The main objectives of the Pre-shipment Quality Audit are to check the other parts of the system,
obtain figures which can be compared with figures of in-process sampling and final inspection,
giving comparisons of the effectiveness of the above two systems, look at the garment from the
customer’s viewpoint and analyze results.
Inspection Guidelines
The Auditor for a quality audit should ideally be from the senior management and should try and
scrutinize the product from the buyer’s point of view. The Auditor should himself randomly pick
up the garments to inspect from the day’s production. These pieces should not be given to him by
the supervisor or any other personnel.
Quality Audit
Quality Audit is an everyday process and should be undertaken without fail. The following
points must be checked for conformity with standard:
7.9 Conclusion
In this unit, you have learnt about In-process sampling, 100% sampling and quality audit. You
have also learnt about quality assurance for raw materials, spreading and cutting, sewing,
finishing and packing. You have also been given an overview of inspection standards and
guidelines for various stages of manufacturing apparel.