Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Section 125 of Code provides that any person having sufficient means if neglects or refuses to
maintain
(a) His wife unable to maintain herself.
(b) His legitimate or illegitimate minor child whether married or not, unable to maintain itself.
(c) His legitimate or illegitimate Major child (Not being married daughter) who by reason of any
physical or mental abnormality or injury unable to maintain itself.
(d) His father or mother unable to maintain himself or herself.
Magistrate upon proof of such neglect or refusal, order such person to make any amount of
monthly maintenance allowance for each of the above stated persons.
As per the second proviso to section 125 (a) Magistrate may during pendency of the proceedings
regarding monthly allowance for maintenance order for the interim maintenance of wife, child,
father or mother. Provided that application for interim maintenance will be disposed of within 60
days from the date of service of notice to the other party. In 1999 Criminal Law Journal 2919, it
was held that though proceedings under section 125 are wholly governed by Criminal Procedure
Code and application for maintenance is entertained and disposed of by a Magistrate,
proceedings are in reality of civil nature. So very basis of proceedings under Section 125 of code
are twofold. Firstly the person from whom Maintenance is claimed must have sufficient means
and he neglects or refuses to maintain. Secondly person who claims maintenance must be unable
to maintain him or herself. In Narain Sahu v. Sushama,1 it was held that no order for
maintenance can be passed under Section 125 unless neglect or refusal to maintain is proved.
Neglect or refusal to maintain can even be inferred from conduct.
Sub-section (3) of Section 125 of Code then provides that if any person against whom an order
has been made, has failed to comply with the order, Magistrate may issue warrant for levying the
amount of maintenance in the same manner as provided for levying fines and may sentence the
person in default to imprisonment for a term of one month for every breach of order. In Priyal v.
Dr.Pradeep Kumar Kamboj,2Minor child was claiming maintenance under Section 125 of code
from father who was living in U.S.A. The Punjab and Haryana High Court directed that
Magistrate to issue warrant for recovery of amount of maintenance to concerned court in U.S.A.
through Ambassador of India in U.S.A. and if father fails to send amount of maintenance then,
Magistrate will proceed according to law in this regard.
There are also various laws governing maintenance except secular laws as per S.125 of Criminal
Procedure Code, 1973 & The Special Marriage Act, 1954 which are as follows:
For Hindus - Hindu Marriage Act, 1955; Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956
For Muslims - Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986
For Parsis - Parsi Marriage and Divorce Act, 1936
For Christians - Divorce Act, 1869
1
1992 Criminal Law Journal 2912
2
2000(2) Recent Criminal Reports 217
ORDER FOR MAINTENANCE OF WIVES, CHILDREN AND PARENTS
Section 125 of Cr.P.C deals with “Order of maintenance of wives, children and parents”. In this
Section, it is given the name of parties who are entitled to get maintenance, essential ingredients
to claim and get maintenance and order of the first-class magistrate.
In case of Mohd. Ahmed Khan v Shah Bano Begum, Supreme Court delivered a judgment
favouring maintenance given to an aggrieved divorced Muslim woman.
WIFE
In the case of Chanmuniya v Virendra Singh, Supreme Court has defined ‘Wife’ and it includes
even those cases where a man and woman have been living together as husband and wife for a
reasonably long period of time. Strict proof of marriage should not be a precondition of
maintenance under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C.
In the case of Smt. Yamunabai Anantrao Adhav v Ranantrao Shivram Adhav, the Supreme Court
held that marriage of women in accordance with Hindu rites with a man having a living spouse is
completely nullity in the eye of law and she is not entitled to benefit under Section 125 of the
Cr.PC.
In the case of Siraj mohmed khan Janmohamadkhan v Hafizunnisa Yasinkhan, the Supreme
Court held that maintenance can be allowed to the wife when her husband is impotent.
A wife can claim and get maintenance from her husband in the following conditions:
She is divorced by her husband, or
Obtained divorce from her husband, and
She has not remarried, and
She is not able to maintain herself.
A wife cannot claim and get maintenance from her husband in the following conditions:
Wife living in adultery, or
Refuses to live with husband without any valid reasons, or
Living separately by mutual consent.
FATHER OR MOTHER
Natural father and mother can claim maintenance.
Mother includes adoptive mother, she can claim maintenance from adoptive son.
Father can claim maintenance, it is a statutory obligation, this claim cannot be defeated
by pleading that the father failed to fulfil his parental obligation.
A childless stepmother can claim maintenance.
In the case of Pandurang Bhaurao Dabhade v Baburao Bhaurao Dabhade, Bombay High Court
has held that the father or mother can claim maintenance under Section 125(1)(d) if he or she is
unable to maintain himself or herself. But it is also important that if parents claim maintenance to
their children, children must have sufficient means to maintain their parents and yet neglects or
refuses to maintain the father or mother.
Quantum of maintenance
Quantum of maintenance means the amount of maintenance. Quantum of maintenance depends
on the standard of living. For example- If any issues raised in a rich family, then demand for
maintenance will be more as compared to poor family according to their standard of living in a
prior life. In simple words, the Court should also make sure that whether maintenance granted is
justified according to the status of a family or not?
CASES
Sustenance defined
Maintenance of wife for her ‘sustenance’ does not mean animal existence but signifies leading
life in a similar manner as she would have lived in the house of her husband. Husband is duty
bound to enable his wife to live life with dignity according to their social status and strata,
Bhuwan Mohan Singh v. Meena.3
Wife defined
“Wife” Includes a woman who has been divorced by or has obtained a divorce from, her husband
and has not remarried, Section 125(1) Explanation (b), CrPC 1973.
“Wife” in Section 125 CrPC means a legally wedded wife and also includes a divorced wife, D.
Velusamy v. D. Patchaiammal.4
Maintenance only to legally wedded wife
Only a legally wedded wife is entitled to maintenance. A Hindu woman marrying a Hindu male
having a living wife, is not entitled to maintenance as this marriage is void, Yamunabai
Anantrao Adhav v. Anantrao Shivram Adhav.5
Maintenance to ‘previous wife’
A Muslim husband contracting another marriage or taking a mistress is liable to pay maintenance
to the previous wife who also has right to live separately which is payable from the date of the
other marriage. Irrespective of religion, husband cannot absolve his liability by offering to take
back the wife and maintain her, Begum Subanu v. A.M. Abdul Gafoor.6
Maintenance to second wife
3
(2015) 6 SCC 353.
4
(2010) 10 SCC 469.
5
(1988) 1 SCC 530.
6
(1987) 2 SCC 285.
Husband who conceals subsistence of his earlier marriage while marrying the second wife is
entitled to give maintenance to second wife. Second wife is to be treated as a legally wedded
wife for the purpose of maintenance, Badshah v. Urmila Badshah Godse.7
Wife ‘living separately with mutual consent’ does not include divorced wife
The meaning of ‘wife’ under Sections 125(1) and 125(4) CrPC is different. Section 125(4)
contemplates a married woman. Wife living separately from husband with mutual consent does
not mean wife who obtains divorce by mutual consent and lives separately and therefore cannot
be denied maintenance on this ground, Vanamala v. H.M. Ranganatha Bhatta.8
Is an earning wife entitled to maintenance?
Wife having a school of her own and possessing wet lands is in a better financial position than
husband who is not doing well in his profession and has no land. Hence, it is unnecessary to pay
any maintenance to the wife, Rosy Jacob v. Jacob A. Chakramakkal.9
Wife’s income to be accounted for determining maintenance
Wife’s income has to be taken into account while determining the amount of maintenance
payable to her. It is not an absolute right of a neglected wife to get maintenance nor it is an
absolute liability of husband to support her in all the circumstances, Bhagwan Dutt v. Kamla
Devi.10
Maintenance to woman in a live-in relationship
The Supreme Court expressed its opinion that a broad interpretation of “wife” should include
cases where man and woman live together as husband and wife for a reasonably long period of
time (live-in relationship/ presumed marriage/ de facto marriage/ cohabitation). A strict proof of
marriage should not be a precondition for maintenance under S. 125 CrPC so as to fulfill the true
spirit and essence of the beneficial provision of maintenance, Chanmuniya v. Virendra Kumar
Singh Kushwaha.11 (This judgment has however been referred to a larger bench)
Recently, it is held that a woman in a live-in relationship has an efficacious remedy to seek
maintenance under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 even if it is
assumed that she is not entitled to the same under Section 125 CrPC. In fact, under the Domestic
7
(2014) 1 SCC 188.
8
(1995) 5 SCC 299.
9
(1973) 1 SCC 840.
10
(1975) 2 SCC 386.
11
(2011) 1 SCC 141.
Violence Act, the victim would be entitled to more relief than what is contemplated under
Section 125 CrPC, Lalita Toppo v. State of Jharkhand.12
Woman knowingly entering in a live-in relationship with a married man
All live-in relationships are not relationships in the nature of marriage. There has to be some
inherent/ essential characteristic of marriage though not a marriage legally recognised. A live-in
relationship between an unmarried woman knowingly entering into relationship with a married
male cannot be termed as a relationship in the “nature of marriage” and her status would be that
of a concubine or mistress and therefore is not entitled to maintenance, Indra Sarma v. V.K.V
Sarma.13
Muslim woman entitled to maintenance under CrPC
A divorced Muslim woman has right under Section 125 CrPC to claim maintenance even beyond
the iddat period. If the woman is able to maintain herself then the liability of husband to maintain
her ceases with the expiration of iddat period. However, on the inability of maintaining herself,
she can take recourse of that section. Section 125 has an overriding effect on personal law in case
of conflict between the two, Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum.14
CONCLUSION
Chapter IX of the Code of Criminal Procedure is essential for the protection of the rights of the
divorced wife, children and aged parents. It is made to protect them from unusual livelihood.
Maintenance is the duty of everyone who has sufficient means for the same. In this chapter of
Cr.PC, there are various provisions given related to maintenance like who is entitled to
maintenance, essential conditions for granting maintenance, Procedure of maintenance,
Alteration of the previous order, Enforcement of order of maintenance etc.
12
2018 SCC OnLine SC 2301.
13
(2013) 15 SCC 755.
14
(1985) 2 SCC 556