Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Phil-Final Exam Semester Paper 1
Phil-Final Exam Semester Paper 1
Through the study of philosophy, many civic engagements arise. One of the civic
engagements that I first thought of was volunteering. Studies have shown the effects on
volunteers when they choose to provide service. The effects are almost always positive
on the participant and can help one self-reflect on their own lives. This reminds me so
much of Socrates and what he spent his life preaching about. I know when I volunteer it
is like a reality check on my life because it helps me to realize what I am grateful for.
Whether that is volunteering for the homeless shelter or seniors, both helped me to
increase my thankfulness for life itself. Socrates believed in constantly stepping outside
of oneself to help determine what is needed to reach their idea of happiness and truth.
For many people, volunteering can be this for them because it can help them see the
different types of people in this world. It could also make the volunteer more open-
From being exposed to different types of people, individuals can come outside
their bubble and realize that they have more in common with someone they did not
expect. Once the common ground is found, a sense of community can be established
benefiting the whole of society. It helps to build bridges between peoples and
cultures....,” (“Philosophy Can Benefit Society, Aid Search for Peace and Development –
UN Official”). When we feel like we are a part of a community we are more likely to do
everyone. This can help us when we are deciding to vote as we would be more likely to
do our research to make our decisions. And let’s say if you were an active participant in
the community, you can also choose what candidate will best benefit your city, state, or
country.
Another civic engagement that arises from the study of philosophy is being a part
of different community groups such as a community garden or a book club. With those
two groups, they both could individuals improve their relationships with others in their
neighborhood and community. For community gardens, they can help food quality as
they do not have to travel the many miles that some kinds of food do. With each group,
it can also help individuals learn from each other and take pride in their community. It
could also yield good dietary habits for habits and encourage them to eat well. By
building this sense of community, it can lower crime rates and even economic
opportunities.
as it could be one's idea of improving their quality of life. It can teach the participator
humility by learning to take care of a fragile item and even learning to take care of that.
From this consciousness can be improved as we are thinking about elements outside of
yourself and the whole picture. Instead we are looking outside ourselves to capture
groups do the same. There are studies that show it can also improve one’s mental
health and self esteem. These all have the common ground of one’s need to continue
Aristotle was one of the philosophers that came to mind when I thought of
civic engagements. Throughout our readings of him, we find that he taught about the
search for a “good life”. The book explains that, “Aristotle argued that in order to
this to be very valuable when it comes to the civic engagements we discussed earlier
and even ones not mentioned. Similar to community gardening, it deals with learning
about plants or vegetables in order to take care of it and yield the best results possible.
By understanding it, we can take the best course of action when caring for it.
Another view of Aristotles that can be applied to civic engagements is the idea
that “... although various kinds of souls are different enough that no single definition of
soul can cover them all, they are similar enough that we can still recognize a common
nature in all their varieties” (Soccio). I can imagine him using this belief when deciding
to volunteer or even participating in a community group. The reason being that although
there may be different people joining these groups, the great thing is that we can come
together for a better cause. I believe this is what Aristotle was trying to explain, is that
we may come from different walks of life but that is okay. And if we work together,
making the most of your situations at this very moment. So, I would assume he would
want to participate in every kind of civic engagement because they all have to do with
donating to food banks or joining a neighborhood watch because these all have to do
with taking advantage of all the different situations now. I think this also deals with his
community groups can make for a full life as Aristotle described. He thought that taking
the different civic engagements. My initial thought was voting and his thoughts on
voting. I can see him encouraging people to vote because he was all about questioning
those in authority. He would be the one to ask those crucial questions of whether we
want a certain political figure in office and if we don’t then we need to do something
about it.
Socrates also taught about standing up for your own truth. This can be applied to
activism or advocacy such as peaceful protests and petitioning the government. He was
a true example of dying for something he believed in which shows how much he
advocated for one’s own truth. I believe he would think activism would come from his
philosophy because it dealt with heightening public consciousness. He, himself was
trying to bring awareness about finding one’s truth so this would be all too familiar.
Even with how he handled his whole trial and execution with no defense because
he felt so strongly about his beliefs. This can be applied to civil disobedience and those
involved such as Martin Luther King. He was very peaceful about his protests and even
got arrested for them but he did not physically fight back. He even references Socrates
in some of his letters because of his teachings on questioning. He never used violence
to make people agree with them but instead used non-violent approaches which is
exactly what Socrates did too. He never wanted to push people to agree with his beliefs
but rather start thinking deeper. Once we start thinking deeper it can be a catalyst to
beliefs of Soren Kirkegaard and his definitions of inauthenticity which “ results when
the nature and needs of an individual are ignored, denied, obscured, or made less
Much like Socrates, I see peaceful protests arising from his philosophy because
he too preached about asking questions to find the truth beneath ourselves and the
groups and systems surrounding us. When we disagree with a group or feel that we are
being inauthentic according to his definition then we must do something about it. Which
I think is where peaceful protests may come in and voting. He always asked the
question of “How am I to exist”. All of these civic engagements have to do with making
a choice to do something that helps you to become more authentic. I think overall his
beliefs were just about finding the answers to the everyday choices we are presented
with.
References:
“Philosophy Can Benefit Society, Aid Search for Peace and Development – UN
can-benefit-society-aid-search-peace-and-development-un-official#:~:text=
%E2%80%9CThe%20practice%20of%20philosophy%20is%20a%20process