Professional Documents
Culture Documents
THE
REAL PROPERTY ACTS, 1861 to 1963
This section has the effect of repealing the Statute of Uses, 27 Hen. 8, c. 10,
in its application to transfers of land under this Act, but not in its application
to wills, Holt v. Deputy Federal Commissioner of Land Tax (1914), 17 C.L.R.
720.
The provisions of Statutes 13 Eliz., c. 5, and 27 Eliz., c. 4, as to voluntary
settlements were held to apply to land under the Act, Colechin v. Wade (1817),
3 V.L.R. (Eq.) 266; Droop v. Colonial Bank (1881), 7 V.L.R. (Eq.) 71. See
now Mercantile Act of 1867. ss. 46-52, title MERCANTILE LAW, Vol. 12,
p. 124.
As to the effect of this section, see also Trust and Agency Co. v. Markwell
(1874).4 S.C.R. 50.
Parties cannot contract so as to exclude the application of the provisions
of this Act to dealings with land under this Act, Hill V. COX (1882). 1 Q.LJ. 78.
See also Power on The Real Property Acts of Queensland, p. 4.
2. Short title. This Act may be cited for all purposes as the "Real Property
Act of 1861"
Collective title conferred by Act of 1963, No. 25. s. 1 (3).
And generally unless the contrary shall appear from the context
every word importing the singular number only shall extend
to several persons or things and every word importing the
plural number shall apply to one person or thing and every
word importing the masculine gender only shall extend to a
female and shall include a body corporate and whenever a
form in the schedule hereto is directed to be used such
direction shall apply equally to any form to the like effect
signed by the Registrar-General or which for the same pur-
pose may be authorised under the provisions of this Act and
any variation from such forms not being a variation in matter
or substance shall not affect their validity or regularity
but they may be used with such alterations as the character
of the parties or the circumstances of the case may render
necessary
As amended by Acts Citation Act of 1903, s. 10; Act of 1952, 1 Eliz. 2 No.
43, s. 3.
Act referred to:
Mental Hygiene Act of 1938; see now Mental Health Acts, 1962 to J 964,
title MENTAL HEALTH, Vol. 11, p. 715.
As to what constitutes an instrument under the Act for purposes of applying
this section to construction, see Walters v. Eldridge (1891), 4 Q.L.J. 118; Hayes
v. Bourne (1895), 7 Q.L.J. 146.
"Land."-See also Acts Interpretation Acts, 1954 to 1962, s. 36, title ACTS
OF PARLIAMENT, Vol. 1, p. 95.
A right to all standing timber on land suitable for sawing with the right to
enter and remove the same was held to be land for purposes of this Act, Connolly
v. Noone, [1912] St. R. Qd. 70; [1912] Q.W.N. 19.
Semble, the words "messuages tenements and hereditaments corporeal and
incorporeal" have the same meaning as at common law, Sander v. Twigg (1887).
13 V.L.R. 765.
"Hereditaments" covers the ownership of mines and minerals severed in title
from the remainder of the land, Chirnside v. Registrar of Titles. [1921] V.L.R.
406.
"Proprietor."-See also Real Property Act of 1877, s. 3, p. 737 . •ryOSf. As
to "registered proprietor", see s. 34, post.
"Memorandum of transfer".-See also s. 48, and notes thereto. The form
now in use is printed immediately after form D of the Schedule.
"Transmission".-See ss. 88, 89; Real Property Act of 1877. S8. 32-34. 49.
post.
"Certificate of titIe".-See s. 33. The form now in use is printed immediately
after form C of the Schedule.
"Mortgage", "Bill of mortgage".--See s. 56.
"Encumbrance", "Bill of encumbrance".-See ss. 56 et seq.
As to what constitutes an annuity, see Mahony v. Hosken (1912). ]4 C'.L.R.
379.
"Registration abstract".-See s. 105.
"Heirs".-As to the present effect of the reference to "heirs" in the penultimate
paragraph, see Intestacy Act of 1877, s. 27, title SUCCESSION. The word "heirs"
in an instrument will be read as referring to the persons entitled under the law
as to devolution on intestacy as it stands at the time of the instrument becoming
operative. See Macnamara v. Macnamara (1929), 30 S.R.CN.S.W.) 245; Morrice
v. Morrice (1893),14 L.R.CN.S.W.) CEq.) 211; Re Goodwin (1904),4 S.R.(N.S.W.)
682; Re Crane (1908), 8 S.R.(N.S.W.) 132; Re Palmer (1902), 2 S.R.CN.S.W.)
CEq.) 200; In the Will of Connell, [1910] V.L.R. 471; Re Goodman's Trusts (1880), 6
V.L.R. (Eq.) 181. A devize "unto my nearest male heir" was held to mean the
testator's nearest male relative, Lightfoot v. Maybery, [1914] A.C. 782. See also
44 English and Empire Digest, p. 864.
The penultimate paragraph only applies to instruments in which persons are
described in the manner therein set out. Walters v. Eldridge (1891), 4 Q.L.l.
118.
REAL PROPERTY ACTS, 1861 TO 1963 ss.3-7 637
With the earlier portion of the last paragraph, cf. Interpretation Acts, 1954
to 1962, s. 32, title ACTS OF PARLIAMENT, Vol. I, p. 93.
As to prescribed forms and their variation by the Registrar of Titles, iee
also S5. 9, 10. As to what constitutes a variation in matter or substance. see notes
to ss. 35, 56.
10. Penalty for not using forms issued by the Registrar-General. and
every person who in any case in which a form prescribed by this Act
or sanctioned by the Registrar-General is by this Act required to be used
uses without reasonable excuse any form not so prescribed or sanctioned
or who prints sells or uses any document purporting to be a form so
sanctioned knowing the same not to be so sanctioned for the time being
or not to have been prepared and issued by the Registrar-General
shall for each such offence incur a penalty not exceeding twenty dollars
As amended by Criminal Code Act, 1899, s. 3.
Decimal Currency reference substituted pursuant to section 7 of Decimal
Currency Act of 1965.
See also s. 143.
15. Land alienated after this Act to be subject to provisions of this Act.
All lands in the Colony remaining unalienated from the Crown on the day
appointed for this Act to come into operation whether waste lands or lands
set apart as roads or as reserves for public purposes shall when alienated
in fee be subject to the provisions of this Act
This Act came into operation from and after 1 January 1862, s. 144.
For payment to be made upon land being brought under this Act, see s. 41;
Land Acts. 1962 to 1968, s. 12, title LAND. Vol. 9, p. 132; State Advances
Reserve Fund, Real Property Acts Assurance Fund, etc., Transfer Approval Act
of 1931, s. 10 (not reprinted: see 1936 Reprint, title FUNDS, Vol. 3).
As to registration of Crown grant, see s. 34. See also, as to grants from
the Crown, Land Acts, 1962 to 1967, ss. 6-12, 285, title LAND, Vol. 9.
The Registrar has no authority to register dealings with land prior to its
alienation in fee by the Crown, Commonwealth v. New South Wales (1920),
33 C.L.R. 1.
Quaere, whether lands alienated prior to commencement of this Act which
have again become vested in the Crown are brought under the Act by this
sectIOn on subsequent alienation, Re Bourke's Application (1896), 7 Q.L.1. 133.
Where, however, a grant upon such subsequent alienation has been registered
under the Act in pursuance of an application in any form, the land is under the
provisions of this Act, ibid.
The Crown has always been assumed, when land is once under the Act, to
be bound by the Act, ibid., per Griffith, C.l. Compare Re Kelletfs Grant (1896),
7 Q.L.J. 10.
16. Lands granted prior to the day on which this Act comes into operation
may be brought under the operation of this Act. All land alienated from
the Crown in fee prior to the day appointed for this Act to come into
operation whether such land shall constitute the whole or only a part of the
land included in any grant may be brought under the provisions of this Act
in the following manner that is to say
The Registrar-General shall receive applications in form A of the
Schedule hereto or in words to the like effect for bringing land under the
provisions of this Act if made by any of the following persons that is to say
By any person claiming to be the person in whom the fee simple
of the land is vested in possession Provided that wherever
trustees seised in fee simple have no express power to sell the
land which they may seek to bring under the operation of this
Act the person claiming to be beneficially entitled for the first
estate of freehold in the said land shall consent in such
application
By any person claiming to be entitled beneficially to land for an
estate of freehold in possession
REAL PROPERTY ACTS, 1861 TO 1963 5S. 15A-17 643
occupied the name and description of the occupant and the nature of his
occupancy and whether such occupancy be adverse or otherwise and shall
state the names and addresses of the occupants and proprietors of all lands
contiguous to the land in respect to which application is made so far as
known to him and shall make and subscribe a declaration of the truth of
such statement and shall deposit with the Registrar-General all instruments
in his possession or under his control constituting or in any way affecting
his title to such land and also if required a plan of all Lands included in
such application and an abstract of title in which he shall set forth and
describe every instrument constituting or in any way affecting his title to
such land together with the names and so far as shall be within his
knowledge the addresses of all persons if any seised or possessed of any
estate or interest in such land at law or in equity in possession or in
futurity or expectancy and shall make and subscribe a declaration of the
truth of such abstract and that he has deposited with the Registrar-General
all deeds or other instruments in his possession or under his control
constituting or in any way affecting his title to such land or if such applicant
be the sole and only person having estate or interest in such land then he
shall make and subscribe a declaration to that effect
As amended by Act of 1952, 1 Eliz. 2 No. 43, s. 7.
For contents of the application, see also form A in the Schedule, post. As
to certificate of correctness, see s. 139.
As to material alterations in an application, see Real Property Act of 1877, s. 9,
p. 738, post.
For application of the provisions relating to applications to bring land under
this Act to applications for transmission on death, see ibid., s. 33.
As to the interests of other persons which must be disclosed, see Re Beckett
(1894), 15 L.R.(N.S.W.) (L.) 94; Ex parte Pennington (1875), 13 S.C.R.(N.S.w.)
(L.) 305; Re Tanner (1886), N.Z.L.R. 5 S.C. 102.
An application by the owner in fee simple to bring land under the Act does
not lapse on the conveyance pending the application of the applicant's estate
to a purchaser, R. v. Registrar of Titles; Ex parte Murray, [1913] V.L.R. 546.
action for the recovery of possession of the said land or any action for
the recovery of compensation from any person benefited by the bringing
of such land under the provisions of this Act or from the Assurance Fund
by any and every such named person or any person claiming through,
under or from him shall be barred and the estate and interest, right and
title of any and every such named person and of any and every person
claiming through, under or from any such named person to the said land
or any interest therein shall be extinguished:
Provided further that any such caveat lodged by any person claiming
an estate or interest in reversion or remainder or other future estate or
interest in the land shall not lapse until after the expiration of three months
from the date on which his right to bring an action for recovery of the said
land or the rent thereof or other interest has first accrued.
(2) Any person claiming to have an estate or interest in reversion or
remainder or other future estate or interest in any land not under this Act,
or claiming by virtue of such an estate or interest having become an estate
or interest in possession, may give written notice thereof at any time before
the issue of a certificate of title under this Act for that land to the Registrar
of Titles.
Such notice shall contain the following:-
(a) Such description as may be sufficient to identify the land in
respect of which the estate or interest is claimed;
(b) Particulars of the nature and of the origin of the estate or
interest claimed; and
(c) An address at which notices may be served on the claimant.
Any such person may at any time give written notice to the Registrar
of Titles of any change in the facts set forth in such firstmentioned written
notice.
As amended by Act of 1952, 1 Eliz. 2 No. 43, s. 9; Limitation Act of 1960,
s. 35.
Where the Master of Titles has information from some trustworthy sourct"
that the statements upon which the application is based are not true, he may
refuse the application, Municipal District of Concord v. Coles (1905), 3 C.L.R.
96. See also Manning v. Commissioller of Titles (1890), 15 App. Cas. 195,
cited under s. 19.
As to title by adverse possession, see also notes to s. 19.
or at the suit of any person claiming through under or from him unless it
shall be shown to the satisfaction of the Court before whom such action
shall be tried that such notice was not received or such cognizance
acquired in time to enable such person to lodge a caveat forbidding the
bringing of such land under the provisions of this Act as hereinafter
provided
As to the right to bring actions for recovery of land or for damages, see
S~. 123, 126, 127.
Noticcs under this section should be served within the time limited for
caveats under s. 19. See Chappell v. Broughton (1889), 11 L.R.(N.S.W.) CEq.) 65.
As to service by post, see also Acts Interpretation Acts, 1954 to 1962, s. 39,
title ACTS OF PARLIAMENT, Vol. 1, p. 100.
shall contain the same matters and be subject to the same regulations
as are hereinbefore prescribed for the case of an abstract deposited
by a person applying to have land brought under the provisions of this Act
As to abstract of title, see s. 17.
Only a person having a legal or equitable interest in land partaking of the
character of an estate or equitable claim may lodge a caveat, Municipal District
oj Concord v. Coles (1905), 3 C.L.R. 96; Tierney v. Loxton (1891), 12
L.R.(N.S.W.) 308.
There are cases in which a cestui que trust may lodge a caveat, Ex parte
Hodgson (1873), 3 S.C.R. 142; Re Ede (1873), 3 S.C.R. 162. As to the right
of a creditor claiming under an assignment for benefit of creditors to lodge a caveat,
see Ex parte Hodgson, supra.
As to whether the rights of a local authority in the material of roads entitle
it to lodge a caveat, see Concord Municipal District v. Coles (1905), 3 C.L.R. 96;
Local Government Acts, 1936 to 1967, s. 32 (12), title LOCAL AUTHORITIES,
Vol. 10, p. 443. A member of the public cannot caveat against an application
to bring part of a public road under the Act, Re Innes (1891), 12 L.R.(N.S.W.)
180. A Crown grantee of land described as bounded by a Government road cannot
caveat against an application to bring the road under the Act, Tierney v. Loxton,
supra.
A person in possession of the land and claiming adversely to the applicant,
but with no title under the Statute of Limitations is nevertheless entitled to lodge
a caveat and to put the sufficiency of the applicant's title to an issue, Wheeler
v. Baldwin (1934), 52 C.L.R. 609. A caveat claiming an interest as "owner
in fee simple by right of possession" is sufficient, Re Robertson (1907), 7
S.R.(N.S.W.) 474. A caveat claiming an estate or interest "by possessory title"
sufficiently claims an estate in fee simple by possession, Re Cooper (1904), 4
S.R.(N.S.W.) 470.
A person claiming a right of way is entitled to caveat, Re Houi!!O}l (1897), 18
L.R.(N.S.W.) 300. See also as to easements, Lean v. Maurice (1874), 8 S.A.L.R.
119; Re Schmid (1881), 15 S.A.L.R. 48.
A caveat "claiming estate or interest, documentary title" is bad, Re Mitchell
(1895), 16 L.R. (N.S.W.) 123. As to what is a sufficient statement of facts where
documentary title is claimed by the caveator. see also, Re Spencer (1904), 4
S.R.(N.S.W.) 471.
As to what is an "interest in any land", see also Sraples & Co. Ltd. v. Corby
(1900), 19 N.Z.L.R. 517.
A caveat is not bad for referring to the whole land when the interest claimed
is only in part thereof, Re Robertson (1907), 7 S.R.(N.S.W.) 474.
On the creation of easements, see Re Webb's Lease; Sandom v. Webb, [1951]
Ch. 808.
The section is only permissive and does not preclude an injunction to restrain
an application notwithstanding that no caveat has been filed. Public Trustee v.
Milrray (1922), 22 S.R.(N.S.W.) 555; Staples & Co. Ltd. v. Corby, supra. Com·
pare Walsh v. Alexander (1913), 16 C.L.R. 293, cited under s. 98. See also note
to s. 25.
See further Power on The Real Property Acts of Queensland, p. 30.
25. Caveats lapse unless proceedings taken within three months. After
the expiration of three calendar months from the receipt thereof every
such caveat shall be deemed to have lapsed unless the person by whom
or on whose behalf the same was lodged shall within that time have taken
proceedings in any Court of competent jurisdiction to establish his
title to the estate interest lien or charge therein specified and shall have
given written notice thereof to the Registrar-General or shall have obtained
from the Supreme Court an order prohibiting the Registrar-General from
bringing the land therein referred to under the provisions of this Act
The applicant may summon the caveator under s. 99, to show cause why the
caveat should not be removed. Where an applicant sought to oppose the
confirmation of an order restraining the Registrar made under this section, it was
held that his real object being to obtain the removal of the caveat, he must proceed
under s. 99, Re Cooper (1904), 4 S.R.(N.S.W.) 134.
Where proceedings to enforce the claim set up in the caveat have been
taken within three months the Registrar of Titles has no power to deal with the
caveat, Re Ede (1873), 3 S.C.R. 162.
Commencement of proceedings within three months prevents lapse of the
caveat even though final decision is not given within that time, Ex parte Hodgson
(1873), 3 S.C.R. 158. A caveat expires at the end of three months unless
proceedings are taken or an injunction obtained, Re Caird (1888), 9 L.R.(N.S.W.)
(L.) 424. When a writ to establish the title of the caveator lapses for non-service,
semble, the caveat lapses, Ex parte McIntosh (1871), 10 S.C.R. (N.S.W.) 146. Where
a writ was issued and renewed from time to time, but not served, the caveat was
removed under s. 99, Ex parte Pennington (1877), Knox (N.S.W.) 317, 376.
Where notice was not given to the Registrar of the commencement of proceedings
by the caveator, the caveat was held to have lapsed, Nicholls v. Lee (1890), 11
L.R.(N.S.w.) 122.
The limit of time and lapse of the caveat may be waived by the person
applying to bring land under the Act. Whether such waiver has taken place
is a question of fact, Wilson v. McIntosh, [1894) A.C. 129. See also, as to waiver,
Nichulls v. Lee, supra; Phillips v. Martin (1890), 11 L.R.(N.S.W.) 153.
A lapsed caveat cannot be revived by the court, nor can the applicant or
the Registrar be then restrained from proceeding with the application, Clissold v.
Bellomi (1889), 10 L.R.(N.S.W.) (Eq.) 187. But see Dwyer v. Caird (1888),
9 L.R.(N.s.W.) (Eq.) 119; Dwyer v. Caird (1889), 10 L.R.(N.S.W.) (Eq.) 83;
Collins v. Featherstone (1889), 10 L.R.(N.S.W.) (Eq.) 192. See also the
penultimate note to s. 23.
It is appropriate under this section for a caveator to bring an action complaining
that defendant has put plaintiff unjustifiably to expense by falsely asserting title,
Stockdale v. Hamilton (1866),5 S.C.R.(N.S.W.) 180; see also 6 S.C.R.(N.S.W.) 261.
On the withdrawal of an application to bring land under the Act, caveat
and injunction lapse and do not prevent a second application, Gaffney v. McLaughlin
(1901), I S.R.(N.S.w.) 373.
See Re N. lobsoll, [1950] 51 S.R.(N.S.W.) 76.
26. Caveats in certain cases not to bar the bringing of land under
this Act. The Registrar-General shall not notice any caveat prohibiting
the bringing of land under the provisions of this Act if the person lodging
the same claims only an estate or interest to take effect after the determina-
tion or in defeasance of an estate tailor prohibits the bringing of such
land under the provisions of this Act on the plea only of the absence
of legal evidence that a former proprietor was in being and capable at
the time when any power of attorney executed by such proprietor was
exercised by his attorney in the selling or purchasing or releasing of
such land
This section by no means gives the caveator a right to object to the title,
and merely provides that if the title is questioned then such and such objections
are not to be taken, Ex parte Hodgson (1873), 3 S.C.R. 158.
REAL PROPERTY ACTS, 1861 TO 1963 ss.25-29 651
29. Applicant may withdraw his application. It shall be lawful for any
applicant to withdraw his application at any time prior to the issuing of a
certificate of title and the Registrar-General shall in such case upon
request in writing signed by such applicant return to him the abstract
and all instruments of title deposited by him for the purpose of supporting
his application
See also Real Property Act of 1877, s. 9, p. 738, post.
652 REAL PROPERTY Vol. 14
30 C.L.R. 34. He cannot question the propriety of an order within the jurisdiction
of the Supreme Court and purporting to authorize a dealing sought to be registered,
ibid.; Assets Co. Ltd. v. Mere Roihi, [1905] A.C. 176. See also A.-G. v. Odell,
[1906] 2 Ch. 47; notes to ss. 35, 36.
It appears that the High Court has jurisdiction to issue a mandamus to the
Registrar to register an instrument at the suit of the Commonwealth. See R. v.
Registrar of Titles (1915), 20 C.L.R. 379.
As to duties of the Registrar of Titles, see also Power on The Real Property
Acts of Queensland, p. 16.
33. Certificates of title to be in duplicate and to be bound up in register.
Schedule C. Every certificate of title shall be in duplicate and in the form
C of the Schedule hereto and the Registrar-General shall note thereon in
such manner as to preserve their priority the particulars of all unsatisfied
mortgages or other encumbrances and of every lease rent charge or term
of years or outstanding estate or interest whatsoever affecting such land
which may have been registered or of which he may have notice and if
such certificate be issued to a minor or to a person otherwise under
disabilities he shall state the age of such minor or the nature of the
disability so far as known to him and shall cause one of such certificates
of title to be bound up in the register book and shall deliver the other to the
person entitled to the land described in such certificate
and every certificate of title duly authenticated under the hand and
seal of the Registrar-General shall be received in all Courts of Justice as
evidence of the particulars therein set forth and of their being entered in
the register book and shall be conclusive evidence that the person named
in such certificate of title or in any entry thereon as seised of or as taking
estate or interest in the land therein described is seised or possessed of
such land for the estate or interest therein specified and that the property
comprised in such certificate of title has been duly brought under the
provisions of this Act
and no certificate of title shall be impeached or defeasible on the
ground of want of notice or of insufficient notice of the application to bring
the land therein described under the provisions of this Act or on account
of any error omission or informality in such application or in the
proceedings pursuant thereto by the Master of Titles or by the Registrar-
General
See also the definition of "certificate of title" in s. 3.
The form now in use is printed following form C of the Schedule.
As to entry on the register book of an order for protection of the estate
of an aged or infirm person, see Public Curator Acts, 1915 to 1957, s. 85H, title
TRUSTEES AND EXECUTORS.
As to entry of caveat by the Registrar to protect interests of persons under
disability, see s. 11 (5).
For the effect of certificates of title, see ss. 44, 96, 109, 123 and notes thereto.
A Crown grant may be proved by the copy kept by the Registrar of Titles,
Evidence and Discovery Acts, 1867 to 1967, s. 40, title EVIDENCE, Vol. 5,
p. 500.
As to entry of unsatisfied mortga~es where land is alienated by the Crown,
see Land Acts, 1962 to 1968, s. 285, title LAND, Vol. 9, p. 310. The mortgagee
under an unsatisfied common law mortgage noted under this section does not
thereby become entitled to exercise the powers conferred by the Act on a registered
mortgagee, Re Smith (1893), 15 A.L.T. 85. But see the section lastly cited.
"Disabilities" means such as infancy, mental illness, or coverture, and does
not include the case of a person taking under a voluntary settlement, Ex parte
Cameron (1894), 15 L.R.(N.S.W.) 139. The Registrar cannot cancel registration
of an instrument executed under disability of which he had no notice at the
time of registration, Ex parte the Recorder of Titles, Barham v. Hog/?ins, (1909),
6 Tas. L.R. 6.
654 REAL PROPERTY Vol. 14
It has been held in Victoria that the rule of law that an infant who contracts is
entitled to avoid the contract before attaining his majority or within a reasonable
time thereafter does not prevail when such a contract has been followed by a
transfer duly registered under the Transfer of Land Act 1928 by one who had
no knowledge of the fact of infancy and who has been granted a certificate of
title free from encumbrance, Percy v. Youngman, [1941] V.L.R. 275; [1941] A.L.R.
358. See. also Caras v. Webb and Hoare, [1942] St. R. Qd. 66 (avoidance by
mfant subject to operatIOn of statute). As to infants, see now s. lIlA.
The Registrar has no duty to endorse on the certificate any notification of a
contingency which might result in a liability of the land to death duty, Ex parte
Dettman (1918), 18 S.R.(N.S.W.) 545.
A person who has the benefit of an easement is entitled to have it noted
as an encumbrance upon the certificate of title for the servient land, when such
land is brought under the Act, Re Schmid (1881), 15 S.A.L.R. 48. As to notation
of easements, see also s. 51.
As to entry on the certificate of a judgment recovered against an applicant
to bring land under the Act, see Re Real Property Act of 1861, Special Case No.1
(1862), 1 S.C.R. 56; Re Real Properly Acl of 1861, Speci.al Case No.2 (1862), 1
S.C.R. 60.
A certificate of title speaks from the moment it is issued, Lange v. Ruwoldl
(1872), 7 S.A.L.R., at p. 15.
As to the meaning of the expression "the land therein described", see Dabbs
v. Seaman (1925), 36 C.L.R. 538. The issue of a certificate describing the land
as bounded by "high-water mark" does not prevent the application of the doctrine
of accretion in favour of the owner, Verrall v. Manly Municipal Council C1939), 39
S.R.CN.S.W.) 89.
The ordinary rules for construction of written instruments are applicable
to certificates of title; extrinsic evidence is admissible to identify its subject matter
and the doctrine of falsa demonstratio non nocet is applicable, Overland v. Lenehan
(1901), 11 Q.L.J. 59, at p. 60. Semble, where land has repeatedly changed hands
on the basis of a certificate of title and the description of the parcels has for
a long period been accepted as sufficient, the description will not be read in the light
of that contained in the transfer by which the parcels were created. See
Boulter v. lochheim [1921] St. R. Qd. 105, at p. 119; [1921] Q.W.N. 18; affirmed,
29 C.L.R. 602.
As to the effect of showing land in a certificate of title as being bounded
by a lane, see Boulter v. lochheim, supra; Dabbs v. Seaman (1925), 36 C.L.R.
538.
Where the description of land was by a plan showing abuttals at each end
of a street, and the dimensions were shown in figures which were less than the
actual distance between such streets, the description by abuttals was held to prevail
over the dimensions given in the figures, Smail v. Glen (1880), 6 V.L.R. (L.) 154;
Archard v. Ellcrker C1888), 10 A.L.T. 196. Where there was a discrepancy between
the description of the area of the land given in a certificate of title and the figures
given in the plan in the margin showing the boundaries and measurements, the
laller was held to prevail, Re Irwin & Taylor's Contract, [1918] V.L.R. 661. Where
land in a certificate of title was described as containing a certain area "or
thereabouts" it was held that such description was not a representation that the
br,d cc'rnpriscd that area, but was merely an estimate. ibid. With regard to
eUl1strlJction of descriptions of parcels in certificates of title and Crown grants,
sec also Wale/Win V. A.-G .. [1919] A.C. 533; [1918-19] All E.R. Rep. 455.
It is now possible, within defined limits, to obtain a title by adverse possession
to land under the Act. See Real Property Acts Amendment Act of 1952, ss. 46
II 1"0., " 7.'(,. post. Mis(,I1/Ilhl{' v. Phillips. [19361 SI. R. Qd. 136, Rc BI'Yl/ulIl
(1899). 9 Q.LJ. (N.C.) 93, and cases to the like effect, must now be read subject
tn tl'·~ Act of 1952.
Sec :,],0 Power on The Real Property Acts of Queensland, p. 39.
34. Grants and certificates of title registered when embodied in register
book. Every land grant and certificate of title shall be deemed and taken
to be registered under the provisions and for the purposes of this Act so
soon as the same shall have been marked by the Registrar-General with
the folio and volume appertaining to it in the register book and every
memorandum of transfer or other instrument purporting to transfer or in
any way to affect land under the provisions of this Act shall be deemed to
REAL PROPERTY ACTS, 1861 TO 1963 8'>.33·35 655
One of several joint tenants cannot make a disclaimer. The only disclaimer
that joint tenants can make is one made by them all. See Re Schar; Midland
Bank Executor and Trustee Co. Ltd. v. Darner, [1951] Ch. 280; 66 T.L.R. 1131.
See Toop v. Rutherford and Gilshenan, [1942] St. R. Qd. 168; 36 Q.J.P.R.
89 (attempt to sell part of un subdivided parcel of land; which part uncertain).
As to the position where two joint tenants have died under circumstances
suggesting that one may have murdered the other, see Re Thorp and the Real
Property Act 1900, [1962] N.S.W.R. 889. Compare Re BarrowclifJ; Elder's Trustee
and Executor Co. Ltd. v. Kenny, [1927] S.A.S.R. 147.
Provision for the closing of the Assurance Fund by transfer of the moneys
therein to the Consolidated Revenue was made by The State Advances Reserve Fund,
The Real Property Acts Assurance Fund, etc., Transfer Approval Act of 1931, ss. 8,
9, title FUNDS, not reprinted. See 1936 Reprint, Vol. 3. The payments
formerly made to the Assurance Fund are now made into Consolidated Revenue
and upon the closing of the Assurance Fund claims which might formerly
have been made on that Fund are to be satisfied out of Consolidated Revenue, ibid.,
ss. 10·12.
The list marked R in the Schedule has been superseded by the list of fees
contained in Order in Council published Gazette 12 February 1966, p. 1147.
The payment under this section is to be made before the issue of a grant from
the Crown, Land Acts, 1962 to 1968, s. 12, title LAND, Vol. 9, p. 132.
As to sworn appraisers, see Real Property Act of 1877, 55. 6, 7, p. 738,
post.
42. Assurance fund to be invested in Government securities. All sums of
money so received as aforesaid shall be paid to the Treasurer of the Colony
who shall from time to time invest the same in Queensland Government
securities together with all interest and profits that may have accrued
thereon to constitute an assurance fund out of which shall be made good
the full amount awarded by any verdict judgment or decree of Court to
any person deprived of any land or of any estate or interest therein by
bringing such land under the provisions of this Act or by the issue of any
certificate of title or by the registration of any transmission transfer or other
dealing with land under the provisions of this Act failing recovery from
the person who derived benefit thereby
Provided always that in case of the insufficiency of such assurance
fund the full amount so awarded shall be made good to the person entitled
thereto out of the General Revenues of the said Colony
Provided also that no person shall be entitled to be indemnified out
of the said Assurance Fund or General Revenue of the Colony for any
loss occasioned by any breach of trust or default committed by any trustee
guardian committee of a lunatic or of a person of unsound mind executor
administrator or other person standing in the relation of trustee to any
other person
As to investments under this section, see note to s. 41.
For duty of the Registrar of Titles to account for and pay to the Treasurer
moneys received, see s. 141.
The prohibition against indemnification for breach of trust does not extend
to constructive trusts or trusts which can only be established with the aid of the
court, Finucane v. Registrar of Titles, [1902] St. R. Qd. 75.
The Supreme Court of Victoria has held that the Registrar of Titles has no
duty towards registered proprietors to take care to prevent forged instruments
from being registered, Davies v. Ryan, [1951] V.L.R. 283; [1951] A.L.R. 623.
for registration and endorsement he shall register and endorse that instru-
ment under which the person claims property who shall produce to him
the grant or certificate of title of such land.
Instruments take effect according to date of production for registration. See
s. 56; Real Property Act of 1877, ss. 12, 14, 15, pp. 739, 740, post. As to the
point of time at which registration takes place, see s. 34. As to what constitutes
registration, see also Great West Permanent Loan Co. v. Friesen, [1925] A.C. 208.
The Registrar must not register an instrument which is not duly stamped,
Stamp Acts, 1894 to 1968, s. 30, title STAMP DUTIES.
A transfer must be in prescribed form and registered in order to pass the
legal estate, Macindoe v. Wehrle (1913), 13 S.R.(N.S.W.) 500; Kelly v. Doody
(1871), 5 S.A.L.R. 132.
This section does not mean that an unregistered instrument has no effect
whatever but that it does not confer an unquestionable and indefeasible title,
O'Regan v. Commissioner of Stamp Duties, [1921] SI. R. Qd. 283; [1921] Q.W.N.
41. An unregistered instrument confers a claim to registration (see Real Property
Act of 1877, s. 48, p. 751, post), and equitable interests in land under this
Act may still be created and assigned by the forms of disposition recognised by
equitable principles, ibid., s. 51; Conroy v. Knox (1901), 11 Q.L.J. 112; Sempil/
v. Jarvis (1867), 6 S.C.R.(N.S.W.) (Eq.) 68; Barry v. Heider (1914), 19 C.L.R.
197; Great West Permanent Loan Co. v. Friesen, [1925] A.C. 208; Little v.
Dardier (1891), 12 L.R.(N.S.W.) (Eq.) 319. An instrument in registrable form
creates an equitable interest prior to registration. See Naumberg v. Albertson's
Executors (1888), 3 Q.L.J. 125. A transferee who is in possession of land under
an unregistered transfer has the ordinary rights of action of a person in possession
against a trespasser, Wilkinson v. Madorsky (1914), 16 W.A.L.R. 164.
There may be an equitable mortgage of land under this Act by deposit of
title deeds, Re Wildash (1877), 5 S.C.R. 46; Real Property Act of 1877, s. 30,
p. 745, post.
This section does not prevent an unregistered instrument from passing the
right to have a certificate of title set aside on the ground of fraud, McEllister v.
Biggs (1883), 8 App. Cas. 314.
As to unregistered voluntary instruments, see notes to Real Property Act of
1877, s. 48, p. 751, post.
As to the effect of unregistered instruments, see also Waitara v. McGovern
(1899), 18 N.Z.L.R. 372; Spiers v. Cape well, [1917] N.Z.G.L.R. 396; Orr v. Smith,
[1919] N.Z.L.R. 818; Smith v. Sturtevant, [1923] N.Z.L.R. 481.
This section does not apply to wills, Holt v. Deputy Federal Commissioner
of Land Tax (1914), 17 C.L.R. 720.
Competing Equitable Interests.-In determining priority as between equitable
interests, the principles applicable to land not under the Act are in general to be
applied, Lynch v. O'Keefe, [1930] SI. R. Qd. 74. A prior equity will, therefore,
ordinarily prevail over a later equity. But where the owner of an equity has
misled the holder of a later equity by conduct amounting to representations
inconsistent with the existence of his interest, his interest will be postponed, Barry
v. Heider (1914), 19 C.L.R. 197. Thus a prior equity will be postponed where
its holder's negligence in leaving the register clear or in enabling a third person
to represent himself as unencumbered legal owner has caused the holder of the
later equity to contract on the basis that the title was clear, Abigail v. Lapin,
[1934] A.C. 491; [1934] All E.R. Rep. 720; 51 C.L.R. 58; Connolly v. Noone,
[1912] SI. R. Qd. 70; [1912] Q.W.N. 19; Butler v. Fairclough (1917), 23 C.L.R.
78, approved in AbiRail v. Lapin, supra. Quaere, however, whether a prior
equity will be postponed where it is accompanied by possession of the certificate
of title, Lynch v. O'Keefe, [19301 SI. R. Qd. 74, at pp. 108, 87, 77; O'Keefe v. Lynch
[19271 St. R. Qd. 270, at p. 276. An unregistered instrument of transfer may
amount to a representation by the transferor to any person into whose hands
it may come without notice of any right to set it aside, that the transferee has
an assignable interest in the land. See Barry v. Heider, supra; Great West Permanent
Loan Co. v. Friesen, [1925] A.C. 208. A person proposing to take a mortgage
is not entitled to rely on the representation of the solicitor of the borrower who
purports also to act for the owner of a prior equitable interest that such equitable
interest has been extinguished, Barry v. Heider, supra. A mortgagee is under
no duty to inform a proposing purchaser of the mortgage where he has no
REAL PROPERTY ACTS, 1861 TO 1963 ss. 43, 44 661
(1934), 51 C.L.R. 217, which, however, is not a decision binding on the High
Court itself, Tasmania v. Victoria (1934), 52 C.L.R. 157, at p. 183. Although
registration will not perfect a forged instrument, a forged transfer or mortgage
which is void at common law will, when duly entered on the register, become
the root of a valid title in a bona fide pu,chaser from the transferee or mortgagee,
Gibhs v. Messer, supra; Bailey v. Cribb (1884), 2 Q.L.l. 42. See also
i,211CCi.!/{(l1d investment and Land Mortgage Co. v. Grimley (1893), 4 Q.L.l.
224, Supp. p. 10; Boyd v. Mayor of Wellington, [1924] N.Z.L.R. 1174; Gallagher
v. Thomson, [1928] N.Z.G.L.R. 373; Kay v. Barnett, [1909] Q.W.N. 39, cited
under s. 56; A.-G. v. Odell, [1906] 2 Ch. 47.
In Davies v. Ryan, [1951] V.L.R. 283, it was held that a forged transfer was a
nullity and that the registration of the transferee as proprietor was of no validity as
against a defrauded proprietor, who was entitled to have his name restored to the
register.
Registration alone does not affect personal equities against the registered
proprietor. See notes to s. 43. The section refers to interests outstanding at the
time of the issue of the certificate, not to interests created by the proprietor himself,
Josephson v. Mason (1912), 12 S.R.(N.S.W.) 249; Cuthbertson v. Swan (1876),
11 S.A.L.R. 102.
Rights of public highway may exist over land comprised in a clean certificate
of title, Vickery v. Strathfield Municipality (1911), 11 S.R.(N.S.W.) 354. The
mere omission to note an easement as an encumbrance on the certificate of the
servient tenement, or to note it on the certificate of the dominant tenement does not
extinguish it, James v. Stevenson, [1893] A.C. 162. Where a certificate of title was
issued without a memorial as to a fencing covenant, it was held that a purchaser
was not bound by the fencing covenant, Brown v. Wellington and Manawatu Rail-
way Co. Ltd. (1898), 17 N.Z.L.R. 471. Quaere, whether an easement can be
acquired by prescription over land under this Act, Boulter v. Jochheim, [1921] St.
R. Qu. 105; [1921] Q.w.N. 18; affirmed, 29 C.L.R. 602. Miscamble v. Phillips,
[1936] St. R. Qd. 136; 30 Q.J.P.R. 71.
The exception by this section of cases of wrong description shows that extrinsic
evidence is admissible to identify the land in a certificate of title; an error in
description of boundaries will not displace the title otherwise good of a person in
possession of land erroneously included in a certificate of title, Overland v. Lenehan
(1901), 11 Q.L.J. 59. As to "wrong description," see also HlNI1ilton v. Iredale
(1903), 3 S.R.(N.S.W.) 535.
A title by aJverse possession can, within limits, be acquired against a registered
proprietor. See note to s. 33.
As to whether s. 44 is binding on the Crown, see Martin v. Cameron (1893),
12 N.Z.L.R. 769; Raven v. Keane, [1920] N.Z.G.L.R. 168.
The rule in Flureau v. Thornhill (1776), 2 W. Bl. 1078, and Bain v. Fothergill
(1874), L.R. 7 H.L. 158; [1874-80]. All E.R. Rep. 83, that where a vendor of real
property is unable, through no fault of his own but owing to a defect in his title, to
complete the contract the purchaser cannot recover damages for the loss of his
bargain, applies to land under this Act, Boardman v. McGrath, [1925] Q.W.N. 8;
Merry v. Australian Mutual Provident Soc. (1872), 3 S.C.R. 40.
See also Power on The Real Property Acts of Queensland, p. 49.
power of delegation, and any such authority may specify the manner in
which the officer named therein is to so sign the name and affix the seal of
the Registrar of Titles
Endorsement signed by Registrar-General to be evidence. and every
instrument so endorsed and authenticated shall be received in all Courts of
Justice as conclusive evidence of the particulars therein set forth and of all
covenants conditions and matters therein expressed or by this Act declared
to be implied and that such instrument has been duly registered
As amended by Act of 1952, 1 Eliz. 2 No. 43, s. 15.
As to entry of memorials in the register book, see s. 34.
The Registrar of Titles has certain power under s. 95, to dispense with
production of duplicates. As to lost grants of certificates of title, see s. 117.
Endorsement on the duplicate instrument is conclusive evidence that the
instrument has been duly registered, and due registration includes the time of
registration, Great Central Freehold Mines Ltd. v. Chapman (1904),29 V.L.R. 940;
Phillips v. McLachlan (1884),5 L.R.(N.S.W.) (L.) 168.
48. Transfer. Schedule D. When land under the provisions of this Act is
intended to be transferred the transferor shall execute a memorandum of
transfer in form D of the Schedule hereto and every such memorandum
shall be attested by a witness and shall for description of the land intended
to be transferred refer to the grant or certificate of title of such land or shall
give such description as may be sufficient to identify that particular portion
of land intended to be transferred and shall contain an accurate statement
of the estate or interest intended to be transferred and a memorandum of
all mortgages and other encumbrances affecting the same and if such land
be leased the name and description of the lessee with a memorandum of
the lease
For "transfer" and "memorandum of transfer", see s. 3.
;\s to transfers to a spouse and to the transferor and others, see s. 82. As
to c~'cct of a transfer to husband and wife, see note to s. 40.
Trzmsfer subject to a charge or easement may be made under the Real
p, j'c:ty Act of 1~77, 55. 23·28. p. 743. post.
Provision for transfer of mortgages, encumbrances ang leases is made by s. 65.
As to attestation, see 5S. 115, 116, and notes thereto.
The form of memorandum of transfer now in use is printed following form D
in the Schedule.
For manner of giving consent to or direction for a transfer, see s. 110.
For the certificate of correctness to be endorsed, see s. 139.
A. transfer of an estate in fee simple need not be in duplicate. See s. 35,
ar;d Re:!l Property Act of 1877, s. 16, p. 741, post.
A transfer not duly stamped should not be registered, Stamp Acts, 1894 to 1968,
s. 30, title STAMP DUTIES.
An instrument dealing with land in a subdivision must not be registered
m:k~s a plan of subdivision has been duly registered, Local Government Acts,
1936 to 1967, s. 34 (17), title LOCAL AUTHORITIES, Vol. 10, p. 458.
As to registration of the vesting of land on a resumption, see Acquisition of
bl1d Act of 1967, title WORKS; Railways Acts. 1914 to 1965, ss. 50, 51, 92, title
RAILWAYS AND TRAMWAYS, pp. 475, 489, ante. As to registration of title
0.' l::C Commonwealth on acquisition of land, see notes to s. 35, and Real Property
(C<';1lmonwealth Titles) Act of 1924, p. 769, post.
As to acquisition of land by a local authority where the rates have not been
paid. see Local Government Acts, 1936 to 1967, s. 27 (11) (vi), (vii), title
LOCAL AUTHORITIES, Vol. 10, p. 413.
The legal estate in land may pass by will without registration, Holt v.
DepUl)' Federal Commissioner oj Land Tax (1914), 17 C.L.R. 720. And see s. 89,
and Real Property Act of 1877, s. 32, p. 746, post.
A purported assurance to trustees upon uses, not in the statutory form and
not registered, was held to pass no estate and uses declared thereunder were held
to be of no effect, Re Ward (1872), 3 S.C.R. 74; Finucane v. Registrar of Titles,
[19021 51. R. Qd. 75. As to necessity for registration and the effect of an
unregistered transfer, see s. 43, and Real Property Act of 1877, ss. 48, 49, 51,
pp. 75 L 753, post, and notes thereto.
/\. memorandum of transfer does not, when registered, operate as an estoppel
so as to prevent the vendor from showing that the purchase money, acknowledged
in the transfer to have been received, has not in fact been received, Kelly v.
Fuller (1867), 1 S.A.L.R. 15. As to the effect of the provision in s. 35, that a
registered instrument shall be as effective as if sealed and delivered, see cases
cited under that section.
As to atte,tation and proof of instruments, see S5. 115, 116, and notes
thereto; Evidence (Attestation of Documents) Acts, 1937 to 1950, title EVIDENCE,
Vol. 5, p. 527.
It is primarily the obligation of the transferee to procure registration of a
transfer, but the transferor is also entitled to do so, Commonwealth v. New
South Wales (1918), 25 C.L.R. 325. Compare Ex parte Hunter (1892), 9 Q.L.I.
(N.C.) 59.
666 REAL PROPERTY Vol. 14
In certain cases where the purchase money for land has been paid and no
transfer executed. the Public Curator is authorized to execute a transfer, Public
Curator Acts, 1915 to 1957, s. 56A, title TRUSTEES AND EXECUTORS. As to
a vesting order under Trustees and Executors Acts, 1897 to 1964, s. 27, title
TRUSTEES AND EXECUTORS, where the vendor cannot be obtained to execute
a transfer, see Re Holloway and White's Contract, [1907] Q.W.N. 34; Re Campbell
(1861), 1 S.C.R. 39. For difficulties in the way of an action by a sub-purchaser
against a registered proprietor for a declaration that the sub-purchaser is entitled
to the land, that the registered proprietor is trustee for him and for a vesting
order, see Maltby v. Pang See, [1911] St. R. Qd. 12; [1911] Q.W.N. 2.
Quaere whether a person registered as proprietor of an estate tail can deal
with the land to the prejudice of the remainderman, Allison v. Petty (1899),
9 Q.LJ. 125. He may, however, dispose of the estate tail by a transfer under
this section, ibid., and an equitable tenant in tail of land under this Act may
dispose of his interest by an instrument in writing duly attested, ibid. See further
notes to Registration of Deeds Act of 1843, s. 16, p. 785, post.
As to transfer of a right to standing timber on land and the right to remove
same. see Connolly v. Noone, [1912] St. R. Qd. 70; [1912] Q.W.N. 19.
Execution of a blank transfer is improper, Halcrow v. Fletcher, B.C.R.,
1 June, 1886; Bishop v. Donkin, 7 June, 1887. A memorandum of transfer in
blank is absolutely void, Gilbert v. Bourne (1895), 6 Q.L.J. 270; Stamp Acts,
1894 to 1968, s. 53 (5), title STAMP DUTIES.
As to the duty of the Registrar of Titles to register transfers substantially
in the prescribed form, see notes to s. 35. A transfer not showing all encumbrances
to which the land is subject should not be registered, McGlone v. Registrar of
Titles (1886), 2 Q.L.J. 182; Perkins v. Registrar of Titles (1887), 3 Q.L.J. 47.
As to whether unauthorized insertion of a memorandum of a mortgage or
encumbrance after execution of the transfer will avoid the transfer, see Brunker v.
Perpetual Trustee Co. Ltd. (1937), 57 C.L.R. 555.
As to the effect of showing land transferred as being bounded by a strip
of land subject to a right of way, see Boulter v. Jochheim, [1921] St. R. Qd. 105;
[1921] Q.W.N. 18; affirmed, 29 C.L.R. 602; Dabbs v. Seaman (1925), 36 C.L.R.
538.
The doctrine that where parties enter into an executory contract to be
carried out by a deed afterwards to be executed, the contract becomes merged in
the deed upon its execution, applies to contracts for sale of land under this Act.
See Knight Sugar Co. Ltd. v. Alberta Railway and Irrigation Co., [1938] 1 All
E.R. 266, P.C.; Wellington Railway Co. v. Haselden (1899), 18 N.Z.L.R. 278.
But see Merry v. Australian Mutual Provident Society (1872), 3 S.C.R. 40,
at p. 63, where the transfer was void; West v. Read (1913), 13 S.R.(N.S.W.) 575.
See further Power on The Real Property Acts of Queensland, p. 63.
of transfer and every such certificate of title shall refer to the original
grant of such land and to the memorandum or other instrument of transfer
to the purchaser or other registered transferee thereof and the Registrar-
General shall retain every such cancelled or partially cancelled grant or
certificate of title and whenever required thereto by the proprietor of an
unsold portion of land included in any such partially cancelled grant or
certificate of title or by a registered purchaser or transferee of such
portion or of any part thereof shall make out to such proprietor purchaser
or transferee a certificate of title for such portion Or for the part thereof
of which he is the proprietor purchaser or transferee
Where the whole of the land is transferred, see Real Property Act of 1877,
s. 17, p. 741, PO,I/'
A mortgagee or encumbrancee taking a transfer is entitled to a certificate free
from his mortgage or encumbrance, ibid., s. 19.
As to issue of a single certificate upon surrender of certificates for separate
parcels or issue of certificates for separate parcels where a single certificate is
surrendered, see s. 94. For power of the Registrar to require a single certificate
to be issued where an owner purchases contiguous land, see Local Government
Acts, 1936 to 1967, s. 34 (18), title LOCAL AUTHORITIES, Vol. 10, p. 458.
the Real Property Acts of Queensland. Compare Nelson v. Hughes, [1947] V.L.R.
2"27, a decision of Lowe, 1., that an easement may be so acquired under the law
of Victoria.
668 REAL PROPERTY Vol. 14
52. Lands under the provisions of this Act how leased. Schedule E.
When any land under the provisions of this Act is intended to be leased
or demised for a life or lives or for any term of years exceeding three
years the proprietor shall execute a lease in form E of the Schedule
hereto and every such lease shall refer to the description that is given in
the grant or certificate of title of the land or shall give such other
description as may be necessary to identify such land and shall be attested
by a witness
No lease of mortgaged land valid without consent of mortgagee.
Provided always that no lease of mortgaged or encumbered land executed
subsequently to the registration of any bill of mortgage or bill of
encumbrance shall be valid and binding 3gainst the mortgagee or
encumbr::mcee unless such mortgagee or enCllmbrancee shall h3ve
consented to such lease prior to the same being registered
. Leases for three years or less are valid and if in the proper form may be
regIstered, Re:tl Property Act of 1S77, s. 18. p. 741. post. As to the etlcct of
unregistered leases for three years or less as against a registered proprietor, see ibid.,
s. 11.
As to the cancellation of registration of leases of extinct corporations, see Real
Property Acts Amendment Act of 1956, p. 765, po)t.
As to attestation and proof of execution, see ss. 115, 116, and notes thereto.
As to certificate of correctness, see s. 139.
A lease for registration must be in duplicate and may be in triplicate, s. 35;
Real Property Act of 1877, s. 16. p. 741, post.
For manner of giving consent to a lease, see s. 110.
As to necessity for registration, see s. 43. A lease for more than three years
not registered under this Act is void at law, Hill v. Cox (1882), 1 Q.L.J. 78. But
where parties have entered and paid rent under a lease which is void because not
registered under this Act, a legal tenancy from year to yeur upon the terms
of the void lease so far as they are applicable to such a tenancy arises, Hill v.
Cox (18S2), 1 Q.LJ. n; Mars/wI! Y. COUpOIl Furnit!lre Co. Ltd., [1916J St. R. Qd.
120; [1916] Q.W.N. 29; Ilughes v. Graham, [1902] Q.W.N. 79; Edl1'ards Y. Horri"an,
[1923J St. R. Qd. 8; [1'!23] Q.W.N. 4: 16 Q.J.P.R. 159. An agreement to give :l lease
under this Act under which the lc,;see has entered and which is specifially enforceable,
comtitutes an equitable lease for the term specified, whether less or more than three
years, and in the Supreme Court rights will be determined between the parties
as if the specific performance had been granted and a lease at law had heen
made, Ahern v. L. A. Wilkinson (Northern) Ltd., [1929] St. R. Qd. 66.
An unregistered lease for more than three years, whether in registrable form
or not, will be treated as an agreement for a lease and if it would be specifically
enforce:::blc will have the same effect in constituting an equitable lease, National
Trustees and Executors Co. v. Boyd (1926), 39 C.L.R. 72; York House Pty. Ltd.
v. Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1930), 43 C.L.R. 427; Hill v. Cox (1882),
1 Q.LJ. 78; Smith v. Ritchie (1919). 15 Tas. L.R. 60; Mayor of Timaru v. Hoare
(1898), 16 N.Z.L.R. 5S2. Many of the New South Wales cases on this point
are distinguishable by virtue of the separate administration of law and equity
in that State. See D[l\'is v. McCol1ochie (1915). 15 S.R.(N.S.W.) 510, at p. :'15.
See further, as to the effect of unregistered instruments, s. 43, and Real Property
Act of 1877, S5. 48, 49, 51, pp. 751, 752, post, and notes thereto.
REAL PROPERTY ACTS, 1861 TO 1963 ss.51-54 669
As to the necessity for leases for more than three years and agreements for
leases to be in writing, see the Statute of Frau1s and Limitations of 1867, ss. 2-5, title
FRAUDS, Vol. 6, p. 207.
Land subject to a tenancy from year to year arising by entry and payment
of rent under a purported lease for more than three years is "demised property"
within the Real Property Act of 1877, s. 31, p. 745, post, Hill v. Cox (1882) 1
Q.L.J. 78.
A lease not substantially in the form in the schedule is not registrable,
Marshall v. Coupon Furniture Co. Ltd., [1916] St. R. Qd. 120; [1916] Q.W.N.
29. As to when a lease is substantially in the form required by this Act so as to
make it registrable, see Crowley v. Templeton (1913), 17 C.L.R. 457, and notes to
s. 35.
The proviso does not apply to leases for three years or less; but it does not
give rise to the implication that such a lease has priority over a mortgage executed
before it, English, Scottish alld Australian Balik Ltd. v. City National Bank Ltd.,
[1933] St. R. Qd. 81; Gangell v. Townsend (1911), 7 Tas. L.R. 107; Daniher v.
Fitzgerald (1919), 19 S.R.(N.S.W.) 260. The proviso only validates a lease where
it is registered and the mortgagee's consent was prior to registration, Bacchus
Marsh Brick, etc., Co. v. Federal Building Society (1895), 22 V.L.R. 181, at p.
188. The proviso is for the protection of the mortgagee and does not affect the
validity of the lease as against anyone else, Daniher v. Fitz/?erald, supra. The
fact that a mortgagee has consented in writing to a lease by the mortgagor under
this section, the lease not being subsequently registered, does not entitle the
mortgagee to recover the rent from the lessee, National Trustees Executors and
Agency Co. of fiustra/asia Ltd. v. Tindall, [1933] V.L.R. 369.
Leases of minerals and mines appear to be within this Act in the same manner
as other leases. See Munro v. Didcott, [1911] A.C. 141.
If the description in a lease aided so far as permissible by extrinsic evidence
does not identify the land, the instrument is ineffective as a lease. Zuschlag v.
RL.H. Motors Pty. Ltd. (1959), 76 W.N.(N.S.W.) 471.
As to whether a lease of land and chattels can be registered under this Act,
see Boswell v. Reid, [1917] N.Z.L.R. 225.
A mortgagee of a leasehold interest by transfer of the lease is entitled to enter
into posses ion upon default under the terms of the mortgage, Mayeshiba v.
Hennessey, [1910] St. R. Qd. 351; [1910] Q.W.N. 53.
See also Power on The Real Property Acts of Queensland, p. 73.
being in force in the said State relating to bankrupt estates there shall be
endorsed upon such lease or on the counterpart thereof the word
"Surrendered" with the date of such surrender and such endorsement shall
be signed by the lessee and by the lessor as evidence of the acceptance
thereof and shall be attested by a witness
and the Registrar-General thereupon shall enter in the register book
a memorandum recording the date of such surrender and shall likewise
endorse upon the lease a memorandum recording the fact of such entry
having been made in the register book and upon such entry being so
made in the register book the estate or interest of the lessee in such land
shall revest in the lessor or in the person in whom having regard to
intervening circumstances (if any) the said land would have vested if no
such lease had been executed and production of such lease or counterpart
bearing such endorsement and memorandum shall be sufflcient evidence
that such lease has been so surrendered
Provided that except where the surrender is effected through the
operation of a surrender in law or under the provisions of any law at the
time being in force in the said State relating to bankrupt estates any lease
subject to a mortgage, encumbrance or sub-lease shall not be surrendered
without the consent of the mortgagee, encumbrancee or sub-lessee as the
case may be.
As amended by Act of 1963, No. 25, s. 4.
As to attestation, see ss. 115, 116, and notes thereto.
As to necessity for surrenders of leases to be in wntmg. see the Statute
of Frauds and Limitations of 1867, s. 4, title FRAUDS, Vol. 6, p. 208.
As to surrender in law, see 23 Halsbury's Laws of England, 3rd ed., p. 683.
such land a greater sum than the amount of rent or moneys payable in
respect of such occupancy which at the time of making such distress may
be then due and payable by such lessee or tenant or occupier as aforesaid
to the mortgagor or encumbrancer or to the person claiming the said land
under the mortgagor or encumbrancer.
As amended by Act of 1942, 6 Geo. 6 No. 14, s. 3.
For construction of this section when the mortgagor or encumbrancer IS the
occupier or tenant of the mortgaged or encumbered land, see s. 61A.
See also the second paragraph of s. 60.
The words "besides his personal remedy against the mortgagor" set aside the
rule of law which suspends the personal liability in debt during the time a distress
for rent is levied, A ustralian Mutual Provident Society v. Ceo. Myers & Co. Ltd.
(1931),47 C.L.R. 65, at p. 80.
Registration of the mortgage as a bill of sale is not necessary to allow of the
exercise of the power of distress under this section, even where the mortgage
contains an express power to distrain, Australian Mutual Provident Society v. Ceo.
Myers & Co. Ltd., supra. But it seems that such registration is necessary in order
to validate the express power, ibid., at pp. 82, 77.
The remedy under this section extends to the case where the mortgagor is the
occupier, Australian Mutual Provident Society v. Ceo. Myers & Co. Ltd. (1931),
47 C.L.R. 65; [1931] St. R. Qd. 83.
The goods and chattels of the occupier do not cease to be such when a
receiver is put into possession of the mortgaged premises under a floating charge,
ibid. As to when a receiver entering into possession under a floating charge on the
mortgagor's property is in possession as agent of the mortgagor, see ibid.
The goods of a husband living with his wife on her land cannot be distrained,
Trautweiler v. Federal Building Land and Investment Co. Ltd. (1896), 7 Q.L.J.
(N.C.) 78.
An express attornment clause in a mortgage under this Act does not confer
any right on a mortgagee to distrain on a person not a party nor a privy to the
estoppel created thereby, Partridge v. Mcintosh & Sons Ltd. (1933), 49 C.L.R. 453.
64. (Repealed.)
Repealed by Public Curator Act of 1915, s. 3, title TRUSTEES AND
EXECUTORS. See now ibid., s. 56.
request of the mortgagee or lessor hand over to and deposit with him the
policy of every such insurance and produce to him the receipt or receipts
for the annual or other premiums payable on account thereof
Provided always that all moneys to be received under or by virtue
of any such insurance shall in the event of loss or damage by fire be laid
out and expended in making good such loss or damage
Provided also that if default shall be made in the observance or
performance of the covenant last above-mentioned it shall be lawful for
the mortgagee or lessor without prejudice to and concurrently with the
powers granted him by his bill of mortgage or lease in manner in and by
this Act provided to insure such building and the costs and charges of
such insurance shall until such mortgage be redeemed or such lease shall
have expired be a charge upon the said land
Paint outside. The words "and paint outside every alternate year"
shall imply as follows viz. and also will in every alternate year during the
currency of such lease paint all the outside woodwork and ironwork
belonging to the hereditaments and premises mentioned in such lease with
two coats of proper oil-colors in a workmanlike manner
Paint and paper inside. The words "and paint and paper inside every
third year" shall imply as follows viz. and will in every third year during
the currency of such lease paint the inside wood iron and other works now
or usually painted with two coats of proper oil-colors in a workmanlike
manner and also re-paper with paper of a quality as at present such parts
of the said premises as are now papered and also wash stop whiten vr
color such parts of the said premises as are now whitened or colored
respectively
Fence. The words "and will fence" shall imply as follows viz. and
also will during the continuance of the said lease erect put up and maintain
on the boundaries of the land therein mentioned or upon such boundaries
upon which no substantial fence now exists a good and substantial fence
Cultivate. The words "and cultivate" shall imply as follows viz.
and will at all times during the said lease cultivate use and manage all
such parts of the land therein mentioned as are or shall be broken up
or converted into tillage in a proper and husbandmanlike manner and
will not impoverish or waste the same
Not use as a shop. The words "that the lessee will not use the said
premises as a shop" shall imply as follows viz. and also that the said lessee
will not convert use or occupy the said hereditaments and premises
mentioned in such lease or any part thereof into or as a shop warehouse
or other place for carrying on any trade or business whatsoever or permit
or suffer the said hereditaments and premises or any part thereof to be used
for any such purpose or otherwise than as a private dwelling-house without
the consent in writing of the said lessor
Offensive trades. The words "and will not carryon offensive trades"
shall imply as follows and also that no noxious noisome or offensive art
trade business occupation or calling shall at any time during the said term
be used exercised carried on permitted or suffered in or upon the said
hereditaments and premises above-mentioned and that no act matter or
thing whatsoever shall at any time during the said term be done in or upon
the said hereditaments and premises or any part thereof which shall or may
be or grow to the annoyance nuisance grievance damage or disturbance of
the occupiers or owners of the adjoining lands and hereditaments
686 REAL PROPERTY Vol. 14
Assign or sub-let. The words "and will not without leave assign or
sublet" shall imply as follows viz. and also that the said lessee shall not
nor will during the term of such lease assign transfer demise sub-let or set
over or otherwise by any act or deed procure the lands or premises therein
mentioned or any of them or any part thereof to be assigned transferred
demised sublet or set over unto any person whomsoever without the consent
in writing of the said lessor first had and obtained
Cut timber. The words "and will not cut timber" shall imply as
follows and also that the said lessee shall not nor will cut down fell injure
or destroy any growing or living timber or timber-like trees standing and
being upon the said hereditaments and premises above mentioned without
the consent in writing of the said lessor
Business of publicau in orderly manner. The words "and will carry
on the business of a publican and conduct the same in an orderly manner"
shall imply as follows viz. and also that the said lessee will at all times
during the currency of such lease use exercise and carryon in and upon
the premises therein mentioned the trade or business of a licensed
victualler or pUblican and retailer of spirits wines ale beer and porter and
keep open and use the messuage tenement or inn and building standing
and being upon the said land as and for an inn or public-house for the
reception accommodation entertainment of travellers guests and other
persons resorting thereto or frequenting the same and manage and conduct
such trade or business in a quiet and orderly manner and will not do
commit or permit or suffer to be done or committed any act matter or
thing whatsoever whereby or by means whereof any license shall or may be
forfeited or become void or liable to be taken away suppressed or
suspended in any manner howsoever.
Apply for renewal of license. The words "and will apply for renewal
of license" shall imply as follows viz. and also shall and will from time to
time during the continuance of the said term at the proper times for that
purpose apply for and endeavour to obtain at his own expense all such
licenses as are or may be necessary for carrying on the said trade or
business of a licensed victualler or publican in and upon the said heredita-
ments and premises and for keeping the said messuage tenement or inn
open as and for an inn or public-house as aforesaid
Facilitate the transfer of license. The words "and will facilitate the
transfer of license" shall imply as follows viz. and also shall and will at
the expiration or other sooner determination of the said lease sign and give
such notice or notices and allow such notice or notices of a renewal or
transfer of any license as may be required by law to be affixed to the said
messuage tenement or inn to be thereto affixed and remain so affixed during
such time or times as shall be necessary or expedient in that behalf and
generally to do and perform all such further acts matters and things as shall
be necessary to enable the said lessor or any other person authorised by
him to obtain the renewal of any license or any new license or the transfer
of any license then existing and in force
The covenant to insure is not limited to buildings erected on the land at the
time of the lease. See Reid v. Smith (1905), 3 C.L.R. 656, at p. 662.
An equitable assignment of a lease does not constitute a breach of a covenant
not to assign, Naumberg v. Albertson's Executors (1888), 3 Q.L.J. 125. The
words "set over" are not equivalent to "part with possession", but are words of
assignment, Lapin v. Cohen (1923), 23 S.R.(N.S.W.) 507.
REAL PROPERTY ACTS, 1861 TO 1963 ss.73-77 687
74. Such covenants may be set forth in declaration in actions for breach.
Where any memorandum of transfer or other instrument in accordance
with the provisions of this Act is executed by more parties than one such
implied covenants shall be construed to be several and not to bind the
parties jointly and in any declaration in an action for a supposed breach of
any such covenants the covenant alleged to be broken may be set forth and
it shall be lawful to allege that the party against whom such action is
brought did so covenant precisely in the same manner as if such covenant
had been expressed in words in such memorandum of sale or other
instrument any law or practice to the contrary notwithstanding
75. Covenants declared to be implied to have the same force as if the same
had been expressed. Every covenant which shall be implied by virtue of
this Act shall have the same force and effect and be enforced in the same
manner as if it had been set out at length in the instrument wherein the
same shall be implied
82. Proprietor may vest estate jointly in himself and others without
limiting any use or executing any assignment. It shall be lawful for the
registered proprietor of any land or of any estate or interest in land whether
such land estate or interest shall be of the nature of real or personal
690 .IlliAL PROPERTY Vol. 14
85. (Repealed.)
Repealed by Act of 1877, 41 Vic. No. 18, s. 4.
An order for registration of the person entitled on intestacy was made on the
application of a judgment creditor seeking to sell his interest in execution, Baud v.
Cooktown Municipal Corpn. (1885), 2 Q.L.I. 93.
For form of order, see Re Pearce, [1947] Q.W.N. 30 (moiety interest under
partnership agreement; assignment of deceased pal1tner's interest), Re Francis,
[1949] Q.W.N. 45 (order that the land vest in infant devisee; noted also under
s. 27 of the Settled Land Act of 1886, title SETTLED LAND), Re Mitchell, [1951]
Q.W.N. 38 (order that Public Curator register as proprietor the daughter of the
testatrix, Who, although registered proprietor, had died without having distributed
the real estate but left a will-<iuly proved-appointing the daughter her sale
execturix and sole beneficiary, no other person being interested). See also Re Muller,
[1950] Q.W.N. 33, where on the construction of a will whereby the testator gave,
devised and bequeathed the whole of his real and personal estate to a trustee upon
trust for one of his sons (the applicant) "until he shall attain the age of twenty-one
years," and the son in question had since the execution of the will attained that age,
Mack, I., following In the Will of Vickers ([1912] V.L.R. 385) and Re Patterson
([1948] V.L.R. 427), held that he took an absolute interest in the whole estate and
made an order under this section directing the Registrar of Titles to regi~ter him as
proprietor of the land. See also Re Henriksen, [1951] Q.W.N. 40 (joint tenants; order
presuming death of one of the tenants and direoting the Registrar of Titles to register
the petitioner as sole proprietor by survivorship). Compare Re Drane, [1946]
Q.W.N.3.
See also Power on The Real Property Acts of Queensland, p. 118.
90. Powers of Supreme Court under statute of the 6th Queeu Aune
applicable to registration under tbis Act. For the purpose of registration
of an estate or interest in land under the provisions of this Act or on any
application for the issuing by the Registrar-General of a certificate of title
under the provisions of this Act it shall be lawful for the Supreme Court
or a Judge thereof in its equitable jurisdiction upon motion or petition to
exercise all such powers as are conferred or as may be applicable for any
of the purposes hereinbefore mentioned under a Statute passed in the sixth
year of the reign of Her Majesty Queen Anne and intituled "An Act for
"the More Effectual Discovery of the Death of Persons Pretended to be
"Alive to the Prejudice of those who Claim Estates after their Deaths"
Act referred to:
Cestui Que Vie Act, 1707, p. 621, ante.
91. No writ of execution binding until a memorial shall have been entered
in the register book and also upon the instrument evidencing title. No
writ of execution issued in pursuance of any judgment notwithstanding
any purchaser mortgagee or creditor may have had actual or constructive
notice thereof shall bind or affect or be effectual against any land under the
provisions of this Act or any estate or interest therein as to purchasers
mortgagees or creditors unless and until a memorial of the said writ shall
have been entered in the register book and also upon the instrument
evidencing title to the estate or interest intended to be charged or taken
in execution in case such instrument shall be produced to the Registrar-
General.
and upon proof to his satisfaction that any such writ of execution has
been discharged or satisfied the Registrar-General may enter in the register
book and on the certificate of title or other instrument evidencing title to
the estate or interest charged or affected a memorandum to that effect and
upon such entry being made the writ of execution to which such entry
relates shall be deemed to be discharged or satisfied
696 REAL PROPERTY Vol. 14
objects are effected by compelling the creditor to proceed with}? a H!Dited tim~, to
enforce an execution by actual sale of the land affected thereby , RegIstrar of TI.les
v. Paterson (1876), 2 App. Cas. 110.
The execution creditor does not by virtue of registration of the writ obtain any
right of property in, or any proprietary charge on, the land, Bond v. McCla.y,
[1903] St. R. Qd. 1; Corfield v. Groundwater (1868), 1 S.C.R. 1~4, and the Shenff
cannot convey any greater interest ,than the Judgment debtor hImself could. have
conveyed, Bond v. McClay, supra. Accordingly interests in the land created pnor ~o
registration of the writ will prevail over the rights of a purchaser from the Shenff
who has not procured himself to be registered, Corfield v. Groundwater, supra; Re
Retallack (1911), 11 S.R.(N.S.W.) 332; Coleman v. De Lissa (1885), 6
L.R.(N.S.W.) (Eq.) 104; Re Broughton (1916), 17 S.R.(N.S.W.) 29; Re Elliott
(1886),7 L.R.(N.S.W.) (L.) 271; Rowe v. Equity Trustees, etc., Co. Ltd. (1895),21
V.L.R. 762, even though not protected by caveat, Corfield v. Groundwater, supra;
Re Broughton, supra. Where, however, the purchaser from the Sheriff has obtained
registration of his transfer his title will prevail and he is entitled to the benefit of
s. 44, Real Property Act of 1877, s. 35, p. 748, post; Re Bosquet's Caveat (1883),
17 S.A.L.R. 173; Robertson v. Keith (1870), 1 V.R. (Eq.) 11; National Balik of
Australasia v. Morrow (1887), 13 V.L.R. 2.
A judgment creditor who has obtained registration of his writ is entitled to
sell within three months thereafter notwithstanding any dealing by the judgment
debtor in the meantime, Re Anderson, Mitchell & Co. Pty. Ltd. (1928), 23 Tas.
L.R. 35; Colonial Bank at Australasia v. Riddel (1893), 19 V.L.R. 280; Re Shears
(1891), 17 V.L.R. 316, at p. 320. The transfer from the Sheriff may be registered
after the lapse of three months from entry of the writ, but if it is not produced for
registration within three months it will be postponed to a transfer from the registered
proprietor lodged before it, Re Real Property Acts (1891),4 Q.L.J. 70; Re Deane's
Transfer (l8n), 9 Q.L.J. 106; Registrar of Titles v. Paterson (1876), 2 App. Cas.
110. A judgment creditor who has obtained registration of his writ under this section
is a secured creditor within the Bankruptcy Act 1924-1965 (Commonwealth), Re
Price; Ex parte Tinning (1931), 26 Tas. L.R. 158.
93. Agent holding power of attorney to sell or dispose of the fee may
apply to bring land nnder Act and receive certificate of title in the name of
his principal. Where any attorney or agent acting under a power-<lf-
attorney from a person who would himself be entitled to make application
to bring land under the provisions of this Act and to receive a certificate
of title for the same shall by such power be authorised to sell or absolutely
to dispose of such land it shall be lawful for such attorney or agent to make
a declaration that his principal is so entitled as aforesaid and to apply on
behalf of his principal to bring such land under the provisions of this Act
and to receive a certificate of title for the same in the name of his principal
and every instrument dealing with such land in accordance with the
provisions of this Act and signed by such attorney or agent on behalf of his
principal shall be valid and effectual for the purposes intended by such
instrument and such land shall be considered to have been properly brought
under this Act notwithstanding the absence of any express authority from
the principal to sign such instruments or make such declaration or
application
698 REAL PROPERTY Vol. 14
Provided that nothing herein contained shall interfere with any express
direction prohibiting an attorney or agent from bringing any land under the
operation of this Act
A register of powers of attorney is kept under the Real Property Act of 1877,
s. 13, p. 740, post.
Applications to bring land under this Act are dealt with by ss. 17 et seq.
As to construction of powers of attorney, see Re Baxter (1863), 1 S.C.R. 99.
Connolly v. Noone & Cairns Timber Ltd., [1912] St. R. Qd. 70; a contractual
right to have a mortgage executed, Re Dixon (1922), 39 W.N.(N.S.W.) 89; the
interest of an heir-at-law, Ex parte Cooper (1898), 15 W.N.(N.S.W.) 290. A
caveat may be entered by a person claiming land erroneously included in the
certificate of title where the caveator had no notice of the granting of such
certificate, Ex parte Salling (1893), 14 L.R.(N.S.W.) (L.) 399; ss. 44. 123.
The following have been held not to be sufficient interests to support a
caveat: the right under a personal covenant restricting the user of land but not
running with any other parcel of land, Woodberry v. Gilbert (1907), 3 Tas. L.R.
7; any rights of a mortgagor whose land has been sold under an unregistered
equitable mortgage. Keogh v. Registrar-General (1918), 24 C.L.R. 413; the
interest of a shareholder in the land of a company which is in liquidation and
has paid all its debts, Ex parte Canowie Pastoral Co. Ltd., [1931], S.A.S.R. 502.
As to what is "an interest in any land", see also Re Bielfeld (1894). 12
N.Z.L.R. 596; Staples & Co. Ltd. v. Corby (1900). 19 N.Z.L.R. 517; Ex parte
Graves (1905), 7 N.Z.G.L.R. 318; Wellington City Corporation v. Public Trustee,
[1921] N.Z.L.R. 1086.
A claimant by title antecedent to the issue of the original certificate, who
had notice of the application, cannot caveat, but may move the Registrar to
proceed under s. 130; see s. 21; Ex parte Doust (1881), 14 S.C.R.(N.S.W.)
531; Re Hayton (1884), 1 W.N.(N.S.W.) 17. But if he had no notice. he may
caveat, Ex parte Salling (1893), 14 L.R.(N.S.W.) (L.) 399.
The right of a person to caveat does not exclude his right to proceed for an
injunction to restrain a dealing in land inconsistent with his interest, Walsh v.
Alexander (1913), 16 C.L.R. 293. See also penultimate note to s. 23.
See hereon, Ex parte Little, [1958] S.R.(N.S.W.) 173 and Re Fairlie (1959),76
W.N.(N.S.W.) 475.
See also Power on The Real Property Acts of Queensland, p. 129.
When a caveat is lodged against dealings with a freehold estate having severa,
registered proprietors, anyone of them may summ_on the caveator to show cause
why it should not be removed, Re Wilks (1933), 33 S.R.(N.S.W.) 276.
The right to object to a defective caveat is not waived by taking no steps to set
it aside, Palmer v. Wi[ey (1906), 23 W.N.(N.S.W.) 90.
It is the duty of the vendor, at the request of the purchaser, to take proceedings
to have a caveat removed, Taylor v. Land Mortgage Bank of Victoria Ltd. (1886),
12 V.L.R. 748.
As to the right of a mortgagee to withdrawal of a caveat lodged by a
subsequent mortgagee in order to have his mortgage registered, see Re Swain's
Caveat, [1902] St. R. Qd. 120; Re Victorian Farmers' Loan and Agency Co. Ltd.
(1897),22 V.L.R. 629.
As to when a caveat against an application to bring land under the Act will
be ordered to be withdrawn prior to the time for lapse under s. 25, see Ex parte
Hodgson (1873), 3 S.C.R. 158.
The consent of the registered proprietor to a caveat does not prevent the court
from making an order for its withdrawal in a proper case, Re Hill and Dodgson,
[1903] St. R. Qd. 101.
The onus of showing a case for removal of the caveat is upon the party taking
out the summons, Ex parte Hodgson (1873), 3 S.C.R. 158. But where he shows
that the caveator has no title which is fairly arguable the caveat will be removed,
ibid. See also Ex parte Muston (1903), 3 S.R.(N.S.W.) 663; Re Talbot (1892),
13 A.L.T. 270. The court will not determine a doubtful question of title on an
application under this section, Ex parte Hodgson (1873), 3 S.C.R. 142; Ex parte
Davenport (1872), 3 S.C.R. 95. In such a case removal of the caveat will be
ordered after a period which will allow of proceeding:; being taken by the caveator
to establish his title, ibid.; Re Hill and Dodgson, [1903] SI. R. Qd. 101; Commercial
Bank of Sydney v. Henry (1871), 2 S.C.R. 160. Where the time allowed is
insufficient, it may be extended by the court, Ex parTe Davenport (1873), 3 S.C.R.
117. Where further caveats were lodged on the same grounds before the time
expired, the court ordered their withdrawal, ibid.; Ex parte Davenport (1873), 3
S.C.R. 121. And see now Real Property Act of 1877, s. 40, p. 749, post.
The court is entitled to make an order putting the applicant or proprietor upon
terms as a condition of removal of the caveat, Ex parte Lyons (1864), 1 W.W. &
a'B. (L.) 119; or putting the caveator upon terms as a oondition of its being
continued, Rismondo v. Rismondo (1886), 12 V.L.R. 1. A caveat was ordered to
be withdrawn on security being given to protect any rights the caveator might have.
such security to become void if the caveator took no proceedings, Ex parte Hodgson
(1873), 3 S.C.R. 142. As to the power of the court to order or permit the amend-
ment of a caveat, see Re Victorian Farmers' Loan and Agency Co. Ltd. (1897), 22
V.L.R. 629.
As to costs, see Ex parte Hodgson (1873). 3 S.C.R. 142, at p. 154: Ex parte
Hodgson (1873),3 S.C.R. 158.
A person failing to withdraw a caveat no longer required may be ordered to
pay costs of an application to remove it, Re Beauchamp (1867), 1 S.C.R. 161.
For an example of an unsuccessful summons for the removal of a caveat, see
Re Gough, [1950] Q.W.N. 9.
It was never intended that a claim should be fully litigated on an application
to remove a caveal. It is not appropriate to consider the evidence, and the matters
of law raised, and make findings similar to those which may have to be made
subsequently in a substantive action. Nor is it appropriate that there should be a
summary determination as to whether there is an actionable right in respect of
specific performance or nol. The matters in issue should be tried otherwise than on
application. See Oil Tool Sales Pry. Ltd.; Classified Pre-Mixed Concrete Pty. Ltd.,
Caveator, [1966] Q.W.N. 11.
A caveat which forbids dealing with the whole of the land when the claim
is to an easement affecting only a small portion of that land is too large and will
be removed, Re Powell's Caveat, [1966] Q.W.N. 9.
A caveat was held to be defective because the quantum of the estate was not
specified nOr were the grounds under which the respondents claimed an estate or
interest set forth. See Re Powell's Caveat, supra. See also Re Fairlie (1959),76 W.N.
(N.S.W.) 474.
There is no power under the Real Property Acts, 1867 to 1963, whereby a caveat
can be amended by leave of the court, Re Powell's Caveat, supra..
702 REAL PROPERTY Vol. 14
A registered proprietor of an area of land who has sold two parcels thereof
and has been paid for one, and executed a transfer in respect thereof, and has not
been paid for the other, but has issued a specially endorsed writ claiming the
purchase price as a liquidated sum, does not have aII¥ estate or interest in the land
(for which he has been paid) which can be made the subject of a caveat, Ex parte
Durmil Pty. Ltd.; Re A Caveat by McCosker, [1961] Q.W.N. 19.
102. Registrar-General may cancel caveat upon proof that the interests of
parties have been satisfied or tbat the interest of the caveator is inadequate
to warrant the caveat. Any caveat which may be lodged under ·the
provisions hereinbefore contained may be cancelled by the Registrar-
General upon its being proved to his satisfaction and that of the Master of
Titles that the es·tate interest or claim of the person by whom or on whose
behalf the same is lodged has ceased been abandoned or withdrawn or
that the rights of the persons on whose behalf such caveat may have been
lodged are satisfied or arranged or in case the Registrar-General and the
Master of Titles shall be satisfied that the nature of the estate interest or
claim of the person by whom or on whose behalf the caveat is lodged is
not such as to entitle him to prohibit the sale or mortgage or other dealing
with the land estate or interest referred to in such caveat
Provided always that at least seven days before cancelling any caveat
in such last-mentioned case the Registrar-General shall cause notice to be
served in the manner hereinbefore provided upon the person by whom
the caveat is lodged
As to lapse after three months, see Real Property Act of 1877, s. 39, p. 749,
post.
A caveat can only be withdrawn by the person lodging it, Re Beauchamp
(1867), 1 S.C.R. 161.
As between the caveator and the Registrar, and, semble, also as between the
caveator and a person proposing to enter into a transaction respecting the land, the
solicitor by whom a caveat was lodged prima facie has authority to withdraw it, at
all events, until it has been noted on the title, Barry v. Heider (1914), 19 C.L.R. 197.
See also Re Paul (1902), 19 W.N.(N.S.W.) 114, cited under s. 100.
103. Compensation for lodging caveat without reasonable cause. Any
person lodging a caveat with the Registrar-General without reasonable
cause shall be liable to pay such damages as may be recovered in an action
at law by any person aggrieved thereby
As to a further caveat on the same grounds, see Real Property Act of 1877,
s. 40, p. 749, post, and Ex parte Davenport (1873), 3 S.C.R. 121, cited under s. 99.
As to whether an injunction may be obtained to restrain the threatened lodgment
of a caveat, see Stocks and Holdings (Imperial Arcade) Ltd. v. Fink (1965), 82
W.N.(N.S.W.) (Pt. 1) 386.
704 REAL PROPERTY Vol. 14
U1A. Persons of eighteen years of age may deal with land. Notwith-
standing any Act or rule or practice of law, any person of the age of
eighteen years but under the age of twenty-one years may acquire, transfer,
mortgage, or otherwise deal with any estate or interest in any lands under
the provisions of this Act to the same extent and as fully and effectually
in law as if he were of the age of twenty-one years, and every transfer,
REAL PROPERTY ACTS, 1861 TO 1963 SS. 109-113 709
or to the effect of the form marked Q in the Schedule hereto and it shall
not be necessary for such instrument to be proved by the attesting
witness in manner aforesaid
Provided also that such questions as aforesaid may be varied as
circumstances shall or may require in case any person shall sign such
instrument by his mark
As amended by Act of 1952, 1 Eliz. 2 No. 43, s. 31.
the said land may be divided marked with distinct numbers or symbols
and every such plan shall be certified as accurate by the declaration of a
licensed surveyor before the Registrar of Titles or a Justice of the Peace.
(2) The registered proprietor shall endorse on such plan that he
agrees to the plan of subdivision and dedicates to public use any new
roads, streets, passages, thoroughfares, lanes, pathways, parks, squares
or reserves appropriated or set apart thereon for public use.
Such certificate and endorsement shall, for all purposes of this Act,
sufficiently certify that the plan is correct for registration as an
instrument.
(3) If the Registrar of Titles is satisfied that the plan is correct
and that the requirements of "The Local Government Acts, 1936 to
1951" (or, as the case requires, "The City of Brisbane Acts, 1924 to
1951"), in respect thereof have been complied with, he shall register
the same in the register book by recording a memorial thereof on the
grant or certificate of title therein relating to the land and thereupon
and thereafter the land shall not be dealt with under this Act otherwise
than in accordance with that plan of subdivision.
Such memorial shall include particulars of any such dedication as
aforesaid.
Any such dedication shall be of all the estate or interest of the
proprietor in the land so dedicated unless he specifically reserves therefrom
any part thereof below the surface in which event the land below the
surface so reserved shall remain vested in such proprietor.
Except as aforesaid, and except to the extent it is specifically provided
otherwise by any Act, any land so dedicated shall vest in the Crown.
( 4) Whenever land under the provisions of this Act is subdivided
into ten or more subdivisions, the registered proprietor thereof shall,
after the plan of subdivision has been registered, apply forthwith to take
out and receive in his own name, a certificate of title for each such
subdivision of the land so subdivided as aforesaid as the Registrar, having
regard to the number of subdivisions shall deem necessary or expedient
for the orderly registration of dealings therewith.
(5) This section and section one hundred and twenty of this Act
shall apply with respect to plans lodged with the Registrar of Titles
before and not registered at the date of the passing of "The Real
Property Acts Amendment Act of 1952," as well as plans lodged with
him on or after that date.
Substituted by Act of 1952, 1 Eliz. 2 No. 43, s. 33; as amended by Act of
1963, No. 25, s. 9.
Acts referred to:
Local Government Acts, 1936 to 1967, title LOCAL AUTHORITIES,
Vol. 10, p. 315.
City of Brisbane Acts, 1924 to 1967, title BRISBANE, Vol. 3, p. 30.
Real Property Acts Amendment Act of 1952, p. 755, post.
Upon subdivision the provisions of s. 34 of the Local Government Acts, 1936 to
1967, title LOCAL AUTHORITIES, Vol. 10, p. 452, must also be observed. See
also ibid., s. 3 ("subdivision"), Vol. 10, p. 326.
Showing a strip of land as a road on a plan deposited under this section is
strong evidence of an intention to dedicate. See Re O'Quinn':; Application, supra;
Ex parte Le Gould (1864), 1 S.C.R. 130. Compare Boulter v. Jochheim, [1921]
SI. R. Qd. 105; [1921] Q.W.N. 18; affirmed, 29 C.L.R. 602; Dabbs v. Seaman
(1925), 36 C.L.R. 538 (creation of right of way by implication).
714 REAL PROPERTY Vol. 14
As to evidentiary effect of instruments, see also ss. 7, 33, 96, and Evidence
and Discovery Acts, 1867 to 1967, ss. 40-42, title EVIDENCE, Vol. 5, p. 483.
The list marked R in the Schedule has been superseded. See now Order in
Council, Gazette 12 February 1966, p. 1147.
124. Supreme Court may order the cancelling of any entry in the
register book obtained through fraud and the substitution of any other
entry. In the event of the recovery of any land by action of ejectment
from a fraudulent proprietor or from any of the persons against whom
action of ejectment is not by this Act expressly barred it shall be lawful
for the Supreme Court to make an order for cancelling or altering any
certificate of title or other instrument or entry in the register book
relating to the said land and for substituting any fresh certificate of title
or instrument or entry in lieu thereof and directing and ordering such
other acts dnd instruments to be done and executed as such Court
shall under the circumstances deem necessmy and just and the Registrar-
General shall give effect to any such order
As araended by Acts Citation Act of 1903, s. 10.
This section and s. 127, are based on the view that a person will not
in general be deprived of land by the operation of s. 123, and the operations of
this Act without some other person deriving benefit thereby, and that a right of
action for damages under this section and the guarantee under s. 127 should
therefore be substituted for the right ,to recover possession taken away by s. 123.
See Finucane v. Registrar of Titles, [1902] St. R. Qd. 75, at p. 93.
For an example of an action in which the plaintiffs were held to be entitled
to damages, to be recovered from the Assurance Fund, see Finucane v. Registrar
of Titles (No.2), [1947] St. R. Qd, 26; affirmed by High Court sub nomine
Registrar of Titles v. Crowle (1947),75 C.L.R. 191.
Deprivation under this section is deprivation of the right of enjoyment, not
of the right of disposition; there is therefore no deprivation until the right of
present enjoyment arises and a remainderman is not deprived until his estate vests
in possession, Finucane v. Registrar of Titles, [1902] St. R. Qd. 75, 96; Spencer
v. Registrar of Titles, [1906] A.c. 503. A person is deprived of an estate in
possession in land, whether corporeal or incorporeal and whether legal or equit-
able, so soon as his right to recover possession is extinguished by the statu'e,
Finllcane v. Registrar of Titles, [1902] St. R. Qd. 75, at p. 94.
This section includes the case of a partial as well as a total deprivation
of land, Finucane v. Registrar of Titles, [1902] St. R. Qd. 75, at p. 94. A
mortgage constitutes a deprivation of land or an estate or interest therein ibid.;
Queensland Trustees Ltd. v. Regi~trar of Titles (1893), 5 Q.L.J. 46. The section
applies to deprivation of equitable as well as legal interests, Williams v. Papworth,
[1900] A.C. 563, as an equitable mortgage created by deposit of the certificate of
title, Tolley v. Byrne (1902), 28 V.L.R. 95. Deprivation of the expectation of
obtaining an estate or interest in land is not sufficient, Oakden v. Gibbs (1882),
8 V.L.R. (L.) 380. A person contracted to purchase a piece of land identified
by its situation and occupation irrespective of its dimensions, and the certificate
of title showed these dimensions as being greater than in fact they were. It was
held that such person was not deprived of land within this section, Dempster v.
Richardson (1930), 44 C.L.R. 576; 26 Tas. L.R. 18.
As to what consti,tutes fraud, see notes to s. 44. A plaintiff alleging fraud
must plead the specific facts whereon he relies as constituting fraud, Lawrance v.
Norreys (1890), 15 App. Cas. 210; [1886-90] E.R. Rep. Cox v. Bourne (1896), 7
Q.L.J. 53; R.S.C. (1900), Order 22, rules 6, 14, title SUPREME COURT.
The section applies only to a deprivation by erroneous registration, not by a
voidable transfer, Re Pepper (1921), 21 S.R. (N.S.W.) 37. Fraudulent misrepre-
sentation is not necessary; error caused by misdescription is sufficient, Has.'ett v.
Colonial Bank (1881), 7 V.L.R. (L.) 380, at p. 388. As to wrong description,
see also s. 44, and notes thereto.
As to deprivation of land by rectification of the register, cf. A.-G. v. Odell,
[1906] 2 Ch. 47; Re Chowood's Registered Land, [1933] 1 Ch. 574.
"Person who derived benefit by such fraud" includes all persons deriving
benefit from the fraud with knowledge of it, Cox v. Bourne (1897), 8 Q.L.J. 66.
An action may be brought against a person who has purported to acquire title
by forgery, Heron v. Broadbent (1920), 20 S.R.(N.S.W.) 101. See also notes
to s. 44.
The protection under the last proviso is limited to purchasers from a registered
proprietor and does not apply where the purchaser himself has brought the land
under the Act, Oelkers v. Merry (1872), 2 S.C.R. 193. The object of the proviso
is to protect an honest purchaser for value; his certificate of title is good, even
against the rightful owner, whose remedy is against the person committing the
fraud or against the assurance fund, Main v. Robertson (1886), 7 A.L.T. 127.
A purchaser in good faith is protected even though his vendor became registered
through error, Oelkers v. Merry, supra. The purchaser must not only pay his
purchase money, but he must act with honesty, Franklin v. Ind (1883), 17 S.A.L.R.
133, at p. 168. As to the duty of a purchaser or mortgagee from a person
claiming under an unregistered transfer to inquire as to the validity of the
transfer, see Gilbert v. Bourne (1895), 6 Q.L.J. 270.
Beneficiaries are not necessarily barred from bringing an action by a period
of limitation because their trustees are so barred, Williams v. Papworth, [1900]
A.C.563.
The damages must be ascertained as at the date of the act of deprivation,
Finucane v. Registrar of Titles, [1902] St. R. Qd. 75, at p. 95; Spencer v. Registrar
O'f Titles, [1908] A.C. 235. As to measure of damages, see Queensland Trustees Ltd.
718 REAL PROPERTY Vol. 14
This section does not give any right of action in respect of a deprivation of
imd or an estate or interest in land within s. 126; with respect to such right
that section is exclusive, Finucane v. Registrar oj Titles, [1902] St. R. Qd. 75,
at p. 97. As to a right to sue under this section in respect of the loss of the right
of disposition of land as distinct from that of enjoyment, see ibid.
See also Boulter v. Jochheim, [1921] St. R. Qd. 105; [1921] Q.W.N. 18;
affirmed, 29 c.L.R. 602; Dempster v. Richardson (1930), 44 C.L.R. 576; 26 Tas.
L.R. 18.
131. In case person summoned keep out of the way summons may be
served upon any servant or inmate of his last known place of abode.
In case it shall be shown by affidavit to the satisfaction of the Registrar-
General that the person to whom a summons ought to be directed
as hereinbefore mentioned is keeping out of the way and cannot be
personally served therewith and that due pains have been taken to effect
REAL PROPERTY ACTS, 1861 TO 1963 ss.128·134 721
135. Costs unpaid may be levied by distress. In case such costs and
expenses shall not be paid pursuant to the direction for payment thereof
the amount of such costs and expenses shall be levied by distress and
the Registrar-General or Judge shall issue his warrant of distress
accordingly and the sum therein directed to be levied shall be levied by
distress and sale of the goods and chattels of the person liable to pay the
same and the overplus arising from the sale of such goods and chattels
after satisfying such sum of money and the expenses of the distress and
sale shall be returned on demand to the person whose goods shall have
been dis trained
136. No distress to be trespass for want of form. No distress levied
by virtue of this Act shall be deemed unlawful nor shall any person
making the same be deemed a trespasser on account of any defect or want
of form in the application warrant of distress or other proceeding
relating thereto nor shall such person be deemed a trespasser ab initio
on account of any irregularity afterwards committed by him but all
persons aggrieved by such defect or irregularity may recover full
satisfaction for the special damage in an action on the case
137. Indemnity of Registrar-General. The Registrar-General shall not
except as hereinbefore is provided be subject to be sued or prosecuted by
any person whomsoever on account of any act done or default made by
him in his character of Registrar-General unless the same has happened
through his wilful act or default and the person goods or lands of the
Registrar-General shall not be liable to execution of any legal process
by reason of any act or default made or done by him in his character
of Registrar-General but he shall be indemnified out of the assurance fund
or out of the general revenues of the Colony in case such assurance
fund shall prove to be insufficient in respect of all losses costs or damages
which may be incurred or recovered by any person under any action or
suit brought or prosecuted under the provisions of this Act touching
or concerning any matter or thing relating to the execution of this Act
and the powers hereby granted
For rights of action against the Registrar of Titles, see 5S. 127, 128.
As to the assurance fund, see ss. 41, 42, and notes thereto.
138. Witnesses to have expenses tendered. Every person summoned
to attend before the Registrar-General as a witness in respect of any
instrument required to be produced or any act matter or thing by this
Act authorised to be done proceeded with or inquired into by or before
the Registrar-General shall have his necessary expenses tendered to him
in like manner as is now by law required upon service of a subpoena to a
witness in an action at law
139. Authority to registet'. The Registrar-General may refuse to receive
and shall not register any application for bringing land under the provisions
of this Act or any instruments purporting to deal with or affecting any
land under the provisions of this Act or any application under Part III of
"The Real Property Acts Amendment Act of 1952", for a title by
possession unless there shall be endorsed thereon a certificate that the same
is correct for the purposes of this Act signed by the applicant, or party
claiming under or in respect of such instrument or by his solicitor or
conveyancer
REAL PROPERTY ACTS, 1861 TO 1963 ss. 135-140 723
140. Fees to be charged. For the purposes of "The Real Property Acts,
1861 to 1887," and any Act amending the same, it shall be lawful for the
Registrar of Titles to charge and recover such fees as shall from time to
time be prescribed by the Governor in Council by Order in Council
published in the Gazette in and for such purposes as may be prescribed:
Provided that until otherwise so prescribed, the fees specified in the
list marked R in the Schedule hereto, together with any amendments
thereof or additions thereto which shall have been made up to the passing
of "The Justices Acts and Real Property Fees Act of 1932," being the
scale of fees in force at the passing of such lastmentioned Act (and which
scale is dated the sixth day of May, one thousand nine hundred and twenty-
one, and published in the Gazette of the seventh day of May, one thousand
nine hundred and twenty-one, at page one thousand four hundred and
seventy-six) shall be the fees so chargeable and recoverable:
Provided further that the Governor in Council may by Order in
Council amend such scale of fees, being the scale of fees in force at the
passing of "The Justices Acts and Real Property Fees Act of 1932," by
amending (whether by increase or otherwise) all or any of such fees, and
by the addition of further fees for such other purposes as may be
prescribed, and for fixing any new basis or bases of calculation in respect
of any fee or fees, existing or prospective:
724 REAL PROPERTY Vol. 14
144. Commencement of Act. This Act shall commence and take effect
from and after the first day of January 1862.
REAL PROPERTY ACTS, 1861 TO 1963 s. 140-Sch. B 725
SCHEDULES REFERRED TO
As to application of the forms generally, see ss. 9, 35, (IIlt('. For powers of the
Registrar of Titles to alter forms, see ss. 9, 3, ante.
Decimal currency references in the Schedules substituted pursuant to section 7
of Decimal Currency Act of 1965.
[so 16]
A
ApPLICATION TO BRING LAND UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE REAL PROPERTY
ACT OF 1861
I, A.B., of , do declare (that I am) or (on behalf of
oj that he is) (here state the description of the estate, whether in fee
simple or a lesser estate, or as trustee or held in trust for uses) in all that piece of
land situated in (here state the situation) containing (here state the area) be the
same a little more or less (exclusive oj roads intersecting the same if any) with
(here state rights of way and other privilege.I' or easements appertaining, and set
forth a sufficient descriptioll to identify the land) which piece of land is of the
value of $ and no more, and is (the town allotment or coulltry section, or
is part of the town allotment, caul/try section, or reserve), originally granted to
, by land grant under the hand and seal of , Governor of
the Colony of Queensland (or formerly Governor of the Colony oj New South Wales,
in which Colony the said land was then situated.) Dated the day of
, numbered in the plan of the (district, township, or
COlillty) of as delineated on the public maps of the Colony, deposited
in the Survey Office, Brisbane. And I do further declare that I am not aware
of any mortgage, encumbrance, or claim affecting the said land, or that any person
hath any claim, estate, or interest in the said land, at law, or in equity, in possession
or in expectancy, other than is set forth and stated as follows, that is to say-
(here state particulars of all unsatisjiC'd mortgages, encumhrances, claims, or interests,
if any). And I further declare that there is no person in possession or occupation
of the said lands adversely to my estate or interest therein, and that the said land
is now (here state name and description of occupier, or that the land is unoccupied),
and I make this solemn declaration conscientiously believing the same to be true.
Dated at , this day of , 19
Made and subscribed by the above-named this day
of in ,the presence of me , Registrar-General, or Justice of
the Peace.
I, A.B., the above declarant, do hereby apply to have the piece of land
described in the above declaration brought under the provisions of the Real Property
Act of 1861.
Dated at , this day of , 19
Witness to signature--C.D.
A.B.
[so 23]
B
CAVEAT FORBIDDING LANDS TO BE BROUGHT UNDER THE REAL PROPERTY ACT OF 1861
Take notice that I , claiming estate or interest (here state the
nature of the estate or interest claimed, and the ground on which ,~uch claim is
founded) in lands described as (here state particulars of description from declaration
of applicant) in notice dated the day of , advertising
the same as land in respect to which claim has been made, to have the same
brought under the provisions of the Real Property Act of 1861, do hereby forbid
the bringing of the said land under the provisions of the said Act.
Dated this day of , 19
Signed in my presence, this day of
To the Registrar-General of the Colony of Queensland.
726 REAL PROPERTY Vol. 14
[ss. 33, 3]
C
[For the purposes of this reprint and for identification the following forms of
Schedule C have been numbered consecutively.]
[No.1]
QUEENSLAND
[Royal Arms]
CERTIFICATE OF TITLE
A.B., of (here insert description, and if certificate be issued pursuant to any
transfer, reference to memorandum of transfer) is now seised of an estate (here
state whether in fee simple), subject nevertheless to such encumbrances, liens, and
interests as are notified by memorandum endorsed hereon, in that piece of land
situated in the (county or township) of (here insert sufficient descrip-
tion to identify the land), which said piece of land is (or is part of) the (country
section, or town allotment) marked delineated in the public map of the
said (country or towl/ship) deposited in the office of the Surveyor-General,
originally granted the day of , under the hand and seal
of Governor of the said Colony (or at formerly Governor
at the Colony ot New South Wales, in which Colony the said land was then situated)
to C.D.
In witness whereof, I have hereunto signed my name and affixed my seal,
this day of
Registrar-General, (L.S. )
Signed, sealed, and delivered, in presence of
the day of
[No.2]
CERTIFICATE OF TITLE
No.
QUEENSLAND
[Royal Arms]
(C)
Reference to Previous
Vol. Folio
Register Book, Vol. Folio
of pursuant to Memorandum
of Conveyance No. produced the day of 19 ,
registered the day of 19 ,now seized of an
Estate in Fee-simple subject nevertheless to such encumbrances liens and interests
as are by memorandum notified hereon, in All that piece of Land situated in
the County of Parish of
containing
more or less, as shown on the Plan hereon, and therein edged red. Being
which said piece of Land is of the marked
delineated in the Public Map of the said deposited in the Office of the
Surveyor-General, originally granted by Deed of Grant No.
Saving Always to the CROWN all the rights and interests reserved to it by the said
Deed of Grant.
IN WITNESS whereof, I have hereunto signed m~ name and affixed my seal, this
day of One thousand pne hundred and
Signed, Sealed, and Delivered, the }
day of , 19 , in presence of
Registrar of Titles.
Scale. cJwins per inch.
[No.3]
CERTIFICATE OF TITLE
Register Book, Vol. Folio
[C]
Dealing No.
Reference to previous
Vol. Folio
QUEENSLAND
[Coat of Arms]
[No.4]
CERTIFICATE OF TrTLE
QUEENSLAND
[Coat of Arms]
(C)
Building Units Plan No.
Unit Entitlement
Reference to Previous
Vol. Folio
Register Book, Vol. Folio
is now seised of an Estate in Fee-simple, subject nevertheless to such encumbrances,
liens, and interests as are by memorandum notified hereon, in All that piece of land
situated in the county of parish of city of
being in Building Units Plan registered in the office of the Registrar
of Titles, No. and is also seised of an Estate in Fee-simple in
undivided shares in the common property shown in the said Building Units Plan.
Saving Always to the CROWN all the rights and interests reserved to it by Deed of
Grant No. Subject nevertheless to interests notified in the Building
Units Plan and any amendments to Lots or common property notified thereon by
virtue of the provisions of "The Building Units Titles Act of 1965."
In Witness whereof, I have hereunto signed my name and affixed my seal
this day of , One thousand nine hundred and :
Signed, sealed, and delivered in the presence of
Registrar of Titles.
Inserted by Order in Council, Gazette 29 May 1965, p. 698.
728 REAL PROPFRTY Vof. ] 4
[No.5]
CERTIFICATE OF TITLE
QUEENSLAND
[Coal oj Arms]
(C)
Building Units Plan No.
Unit Entitlement
Reference to Previous
Vol. Folio
Register Book, Vol. Folio
is now seised of an Estate in Fee-simple as tenant in common in undivided
part or share, subject nevertheless to such encumbrances, liens, and interests as are
by memorandum notified hereon, in All that piece of land situated in the county
of parish of city of being
in Building Units Plan registered in the Office of the Registrar of Titles.
No. and is also seised of an Estate in Fee-simple in an undivided
share of a undivided in the common property
shown in the said Bui1din~ Units Plan.
Saving Alway, to the CR()WN all the rights and interests reserved to it by Deed of
Grant No. Subject nevertheless to interests notified in the Building
Units Plan and any amendments to Lots or common property notified thereon by
virtue of the provisions of "The Building Units Tilles Act oj 1965."
In Witness whereof, I have hereunto signed my name and affixed my seal
this day of One thousand nine hundred and
Signed, sealed and delivered in presence of
Registrar of Titles.
[No.6]
C
Conditions and Reservation,: Certificate of Title
DIG. No.:
Portion: Register Book,
Allotment: QUEENSLAND Vol. Folio
Section: [Royal Arms] Issued:
Dealing No.:
Previous Title:
Vol. Folio
I certify that the person or persons described in the First Schedule and
whose name or names has or have not been cancelled is or are the registered
proprietor or proprietors of the undermentioned estate in the land within
described subject nevertheless to conditions and reservations in the Deed of
Grant therefor together with such easements and subject to such encumbrances
liens and interests as are shown in the Second Schedule.
Witness: Registrar of Titles.
Scale: chains per inch.
PLAN OF LAND
t
containing an area of
ESTATE AND LAND REFERRED TO
Estate in Fee Simple in
, Parish
on Registered Plan No.
• County
FIRST SCHEDULE-continued overleaf
Registrar of Titles.
SECOND SCHEDULE-continued o~'erleaf
Registrar of Titles.
FIRST SCHEDULE-continued
1 '
1 .
'0
>
SECOND SCHEDULE--continued
--'------.--.---- -----
I Cancellation
i i '
Instrument
Particulars
I Signature
I. Entered I of I
I
Instrument I
....o _______ I
i Registrar
of Titles
I Signature
of
I
I
I
Nature No. Pro- I
I I I I Registrar
Nature I No.1 Pro- Entered of Titles
1
---,-' '---I--I---i--I-I---I--
, duced ! , I duced ,
: ' ! :
~s.48,3] D
[For the purposes of this reprint and for identification the following forms of
Schedule D have been numbered consecutively.]
[No.1]
QUEENSLAND
MEMORANDUM OF TRANSFER
I, A.B., being registered as the proprietor of an estate (here state 1UJture of the
estate or interest, whether in fee simple or life estate, or of ,a greater or less description
than a life estate) subject, however, to such encumbrances, liens, and interests as
are notified by memorandum endorsed hereon, in all that piece of land situated in
the (county, or township) of , containing (here state area), be the
same a little more or less (exclusively of roads intersecting the same, if any. Here
state rights of way, privileges, or easements, if any, intended to be conveyed; and if
the land to be dealt with contain all that is included in an existing grant or certificate
refer thereto for descripion of parcels and diagrams, otherwise set forth the
houndories in chains, links, or feet, and reter to plan delineated on the margin, or
annexed to the instrument, or deposited in the Registry Office), which said piece of
land is (or is part of) the (country section, or town allotment), marked ,
delineated in the public map of the said (county or township) deposited in the office
of the Surveyor-General, which was originally granted the day of
, under the hand and seal of , Governor of the said
Colony (or formerly Governor of the Colony of New South Wales, in
which Colony the said land was then situated) to C.D., in consideration of the sum
of $ , paid to me by E.F., the receipt of which sum I hereby
acknowledge, do hereby transfer to the said E.F. (all my estate or interest. or a
lesser estate or interest, describing such lesser estate,) in the said piece of land.
In witness whereof I have hereunto subscribed my name, this day
of
Signed on the day above-named, by the J
said A.B., in the presence of G.H.
[No.2]
MEMORANDUM OF TRANSFER
of being the Registered Proprietor of an Estate
Subject, however, to such encumbrances, liens, and interests as are notified by
Memorandum endorsed hereon, in all th piece of Land described in the following
Schedule, namely:-
ScHEDULE
-------
Deed of Certificate
Grant of Title Vol. Folio CoUNTY PARISH Description of Land AREA
No. No.
A. R. P.
-- ---
I
I
I
I
I I- - - I --
I
In conSideratIon of the sum of
paid to by
the receipt of which sum hereby acknowledge
Do hereby Transfer to the said
all estate and interest in the said piece of land
In witness whereof have hereunto subscribed name this
day of 193
Signed on the day above-named by the )
said , Signature of }
Vendor
In the presence of '
Signature of
Correct for the pur~ of Registration. Purchaser
REAL PROPERTY ACTS, 1861 TO 1963 Schs. D-F 731
[So 52]
E
LEASE
I, A.B., being registered as proprietor of an estate (here state nature at ~he
estate or interest, whether in fee simple or life estate, or of a greater or less descTlptlon
than a life estate) subject, however, to such encumbrances, liens, and interests as
are notified by memorandum endorsed hereon, in that piece of land situated in the
(county, or township) of containing (here state area), be the same a
little more or less (exclusive of roads intersecting the same, if any [here state rights
of way, privileges, or easements, if any, intended to be conveyed.] If the land to be
dealt with contains all that is included in an existing grant or certificate of title, refer
thereto for description and diagram; otherwise set forth the boundaries in chains,
links, or feet, and refer to a plan thereof on margin of or annexed to the lease, or
deposited in the Registry Office), which said piece of land is (or is part of) the
(country section, or town allotment), marked , delineated in the public
map of the said (county, or township) deposited in the office of the Surveyor-General,
which was originally granted the day of , under the hand
and seal of , Governor of the said Colony (or , formerly
Governor of the Colony of New South Wales, in which Colony the said land was
then situated), to C.D., do hereby lease to E.F., of (here insert description) all the
said lands, to be held by him, the said E.F., as tenant for the space of
years, at the yearly rental of $ , payable (here insert terms of paYment
of rent) subject to the following covenants, conditions, and restrictions (here set
forth all special covenants, if any, and state what covenants declared by the Real
Property Act of 1861, to be implied against a lessor and lessee respectively are
intended to be barred or modified, and in what manner).
I, E.F., of (here insert description), do hereby accept this lease of ,the above
described lands, to be held by me as tenant, and subject to the conditions, restrictions,
and covenants above set forth.
Dated this day of
Signed by the above-named A.B., as lessor, and by the above-named E.P., as
lessee, this day of , in presence of X.Y.
(Signed) A.B., Lessor.
E.F., Lessee.
land is (or is part of) the (country section, or town allotment) marked ,
delineated in the public map of the said (county, or township), deposited in the
office of the Surveyor-General, which was originally granted the day of
, under the hand and seal of Governor of the said Colony
(or formerly Governor of the Colony of New South Wales, in which
Colony the said land was then situated) to C.D.
In consideration of the sum of $ , this day lent to me by E.F., of
(here insert description), the receipt of which sum I hereby acknowledge, do hereby
covenant with the said E.F., that I will pay to him, the said E.F., the above sum of
$ on the day of . Secondly, that I will pay
interest on the said sum at the rate of $ by the $100 in the year, by
equal payments on the day of , and on the
day of , in every year. Thirdly (here set forth special covenants, if any
are intended, and state what covenants declared by the Real Property Act of 1861,
to be implied in mortgages are intended to be barred or modified, and if so in what
malIner). And for the better securing to the said E.F. the repayment in manner
aforesaid of the said principal sum and interest, I hereby mortgage to the said E.F.
all my estate and interest in the said land above described.
In witness whereof I have hereto signed my name this day of
A.B., Mortgagor.
Signed by the above-named A.B., as mortgagor, this day of
in presence of G.H.
Semble, the word "encumbrance" in the fifth last line and in the third last line
should read "encumbrancee".
REAL PROPERTY ACTS, 1861 TO 1963 Sells. F-K 733
[so 65]
H
TRANSFER OF MORTGAGE, LEASE, OR ENCUMBRANCE, TO BE ENDORSED ON ORIGINAL
MORTGAGE, BILL OF ENCUMBRANCE, OR LEASE
I, the within-mentioned C.D., in consideration of $ , this day paid to
me by X.Y., of , the receipt of which sum I do hereby acknowledge,
hereby transfer to him the estate or interest in respect to which I am registered
proprietor, as set forth and described in the within-written security, together with
all my rights, powers, estate, and interest therein.
In witness whereof I have hereunto subscribed my name this day of
C.D.
Signed by the above-mentioned C.D., in the presence of E.F., the
day of
Accepted as above X.Y., transferee,
In the presence of G.H.
Schedule of Trusts
It is agreed that the above described land shall be held by the above-named
trustees upon the trllsts following that is to say-
Semble, the words "of the said Colony" in the seventh line from the end should
follow "to C.D."
[so 98]
K
CAVEAT FORBIDDING REGISTRATION OF DEALING WITH ESTATE OR INTEREST
To the Registrar-General of Queensland.
Take notice, that I , claiming estate or interest (here state the
nature of the estate or interest claimed, and the grounds on which such claim is
founded) in (here describe land) forbid the registration of any memorandum of
sale, or other instrument affecting the said land, save and except (here describe any
instrument the registration of which is by the caveat not forbidden), until this
734 REAL PROPERTY Vol. 14
[So 104]
L
POWER-oF-ArrORNEY
I, A.B., being registered as proprietor of an estate (here state nature of
the estate or interest, whether in fee simple or life estate, or of a greater or
less description than a life estate) subject, however, to such encumbrances,
liens, and interests as are notified by memoranda endorsed hereon, in (here
refer to schedule for description and content of the several parcels of /ond
intended to be affected, which schedule must contain reference to the existing
certificate of title or land grant of each parcel) do hereby appoint C.D., to
be my true and lawful attorney and on my behalf, to (here state the nature and
extent of the powers intended to be conferred, as whether to sell, lease, mortgage,
etc.) the lands in the said schedule described, subject nevertheless to the restrictions
and limitations declared and set forth at foot hereof, and to execute all such
instruments, and do all such acts, matters, and things as may be necessary for
carrying out the powers hereby given, and for the recovery of all rents and sums of
money that may become or are now due or owing to me in respect of the said lands,
and for the enforcement of all contracts, covenants, or conditions binding upon any
lessee or occupier of the said lands, or upon any other person in respect of the same,
and for the taking and maintaining possession of the said lands, and for protecting
the same from waste, damage, or trespass.
I declare the said lands (or my estate or interest in the said lands) shall not
be sold for less than $ (here insert conditions, if any to be imposed).
I declare the amount of money to be raised by mortgage on the security of the
said lands under this power shall not exceed $ , or be less than ,
and that the rate of interest at which the same is raised shall not exceed $
for every $100, by the year.
I declare the said land shall not be leased for any term of years exceeding
or at a less rent than $ (here insert conditions, such as
whether right of purchase may be given, and at what price, etc., etc.).
I declare that this power shall not be exercised after the expiration of
from the date hereof.
In witness whereof I have hereunto subscribed my name this
day of
Signed by the abovenamed A.B. this day of in the
presence of X.Y.
Schedule referred to.
[ss. 105, 3]
M
REGISTRATION ABSTRACT
I, A.B., being registered as proprietor of an estate (here state nature of the
estate or interest, whether in fee simple or life estate, or of a greater or less
description than a life estate) subject, however, to such encumbrances. liens. and
interests as are notified by memoranda endorsed hereon, in (here refer to schedule for
REAL PROPERTY ACTS, 1861 TO 1963 Sells. K-O 735
description and content of the several parcels of land intended to be dealt with,
which schedule must contain reference to the existing grants or certificates of title
of the said parcels of land) requ~st that a registration abstract o~ my title. to the
said lands may be granted, enabhng me ,to sell, lease, or otherwise deal WIth the
same, at places without the limits of the Colony.
(Signed) A.B.
To the Registrar-General.
Signed by the above-named A.B., this day of , in the
presence of X.Y.
I, , Registrar-General of the Colony of Queensland, do hereby
certify that the above particulars relating to the above-<lescribed land, and to the
estate and interest therein of E.B., whose signature is above subscribed, are correct
as appears by entries recorded in the register book of the said Colony, Vol.
Fol. Pursuant therefore to the above application, and by virtue of the
powers in me vested by Act of the Legislature of the said Colony, intituled "The
Real Property Act of 1861," this registration abstract is issued for the purpose of
enabling the said A.B. to deal with the said lands at places without the limits of
the said Colony.
This abstract shall continue in force from the date thereof to the
day of , unless sooner delivered up.
In witness whereof I have hereunto signed my name and affixed my seal this
day of
Registrar-General.
Signed, sealed, and delivered the day of in the presence
of X.Y.
Schedule referred to.
[so 108]
N
REvOCATION ORDER
I, A.B., of , being seised of an estate (here state the nature of the
estate, whether in fee simple or ot a less description), all that piece of land (here
describe land, referring to the existing grant, certificate, or other instrument of title),
hereby revoke the power of mortgaging (or selling) the said land, given by me to
by a power-of-attorney, dated the day of
In witness whereof I have hereunto subscribed my name this day of
A.B., of
I, M.~., Registr!lr-General! hereby certify that the above-named proprietor has
executed this revocatlon order In manner above appearing, and that the particulars
thereof are entered in the register book.
(Signed) , Registrar-General.
Semble, the word "in" should precede "all that piece of land".
o
Repealed by Act of 1952, 1 Eliz. 2 No. 43, s. 38 (b).
REAL PROPERTY Vol. 14
[so 116]
P
CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRAR-GENERAL, JUSTICE OF THE PEACE, ETC., TAKING
DECLARATION OF ATTESTING WITNESS
Appeared before me at , the day of ,
C.D., of attesting witness to this instrument, and acknowledged his
signature to the same; and did further declare that A.B., the party executing the
same, was personally known to him, the said C.D., and that the signature of the said
instrument is in the handwriting of the said A.B.
(Signed) Registrar-General or J.P.
[so 116]
Q
CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRAR-GENERAL OR JUSTICE OF THE PEACE BEFORE WHOM
INSTRUMENT MAY HAVE BEEN EXECUTED BY THE PARTIES THERETO
Appeared before me at , the day of , A.B.,
of the party executing the within instrument, and did freely and
voluntarily sign the same.
(Signed) Registrar-General or J.P.
R
[This Schedule which prescribed fees payable for the performance of the several
acts, matters and thing, therein specified has been superseded. See Order in Council
made under present section 140 of the Act, published Gazette 12 February 1966,
p. 1147.]