Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The modal verbs include can, must, may, might, will, would, should. They are used with other
verbs to express ability, obligation, possibility, and so on. Below is a list showing the most useful
modals and their most common meanings:
We tend to use could as the past tense of can to talk about ability in the past:
We use could to talk about less definite aspects of possibility or suggested options,
either now or in the future:
These past modal verbs are all used hypothetically, to talk about things that didn't really
happen in the past
Should have means that something I’m sorry that I’m late
did not happen, but we wish it had for work. I should
happened. We use should have to have woken up
earlier.
talk about past mistakes.
We use may:
We use might:
We use may have and might have to show that something has possibly happened now or
happened at some time in the past:
It’s ten o’clock. They might have arrived now.[= Perhaps they have arrived]
They may have arrived hours ago. [= Perhaps they arrived hours ago.]
If you don’t know the truth about a possible past situation at the time of speaking or writing,
you can use may have or might have:
√ I think that comment may have offended some people.
√ I think that comment might have offended some people.
If you’re referring to a possibility in the past but you know that it didn’t actually happen, it’s
preferable to use might have:
√ Rose assured us that she was well, but she might have been badly hurt.
X Rose assured us that she was well, but she may have been badly hurt.
When politely asking for permission to do something, it’s acceptable to use may or might, but
nowadays might is regarded as very formal. May is considered more polite than the most
typical way of asking permission in English, using can:
May I borrow your pen? [polite] Might I borrow your pen? [polite and very formal] Can I
borrow your pen? [less polite; considered by some to be incorrect usage]
When giving (or refusing) permission, only may and can are acceptable:
√ Yes, you may (borrow my pen). [polite] √ Yes, you can (borrow my pen). [less polite] X Yes,
you might (borrow my pen).
√ No, you may not (borrow my pen). [polite] √ No, you can’t (borrow my pen). [less polite] X
No, you might not (borrow my pen).
Both Must and have to express obligation or necessity, but there are some small differences:
• Must expresses the speaker's feelings, whereas have to expresses, above all, an impersonal
idea:
You must come. You are obliged to come (I require that you come)
You have to come. You are obliged to come. (There's a rule requiring you to come)
Must I wear this tie? Am I obliged to wear this tie? (What do you think?)
Do I have to wear this tie? Am I obliged to wear this tie? (Is there a rule about ties?)
• Have to mainly expresses general obligations, while must is used for specific obligations:
I have to brush my teeth twice a day.
I must tell you something.
Important: To express obligation, duty or necessity in the future or the past, must and need are
not used. They are replaced by have to:
We must (need to) buy another ticket.
We had to buy another ticket yesterday.
We'll have to buy another ticket later.
However, in their negative forms, mustn't and don't have to have completely different
meanings:
Ought to
Ought to and should are similar in meaning. Should is more common than ought to. Ought to is
more formal than should.They both express the conditional:
You ought to pay him back shortly. You should pay him back shortly.
She oughtn't speak so loudly. It would be better if she didn't speak so loudly.
You ought not to speak with your mouth full. You should not speak with your mouth full.
The negative of ought to is not common. We usually use shouldn’t or should not instead:
You shouldn’t speak to your father like that.
We use ought to have + -ed form to talk about things that were desired or ideal in the past but
which didn’t happen. It can express regret:
We ought to have locked the gate. Then the dog wouldn’t have got out. (The ideal or desired
thing was that we locked the gate, but we didn’t.)
I often think that I ought to have studied medicine not pharmacy. (I would be happier now if I
had studied medicine.)