Professional Documents
Culture Documents
On 31 December 2018 Beta Ltd’s retained earnings were BDT 1,250,000 and its revaluation surplus was
BDT 350,000. All other components of equity were unchanged.
The consideration for the equity stock was paid in below manner-
i) Madina Ltd. had taken over an overdue loan of BDT 7,600,000, which Madina Ltd. had immediately paid off.
ii) Madina Ltd. handed over a sedan car with carrying amount of BDT 200,000. The car had a fair value of
BDT 1,000,000. No entry was passed in the books of Madina Ltd.
b) The fair values of the assets and liabilities of Beta Ltd. at the date of acquisition were equal to their
carrying amounts, with the exception of inventory. On 1 January 2018 the fair value of Beta Ltd’s
inventories was BDT 125,000 but their carrying amount was BDT 108,000. At 31 December 2018 half
of these inventories were still held by Beta Ltd.
c) Madina Ltd has decided to measure goodwill and the non-controlling interest using the proportionate method.
d) Madina Group acquired 40% of Gama Ltd on 30 June 2018 for BDT 186,000 when the retained
earnings of Gama Ltd were BDT 150,000. Gama Ltd. had declared 50% cash dividend, on 30
September 2018.
e) Gama Ltd. had a disaster in operation during the 4th quarter, which had led to negative retained earnings
at the end of the year.
f) On 1 January 2018 Madina Ltd. sold a machine to Beta Ltd for BDT 180,000. The machine had a
carrying amount in Madina Ltd’s books of BDT 156,000. The estimated remaining useful life of the
machine was reassessed on the date of sale at six years.
g) In October 2018, Madina Ltd. sold goods to Gama Ltd. for BDT 20,000, making a gross profit margin
of 30%. At 31 December 2018 Gama Ltd held one-third of these goods in its inventories.
h) Inventories in the statements of financial position of all three companies at 31 December 2018 were
based on physical inventory counts carried out on 31 December 2018.
i) However, on 10 January 2019 Beta Ltd received a report from one of its customers, showing that on 31
December 2018 the customer held BDT 23,600 (at cost to the customer) of Beta Ltd’s inventories on a
sale or return basis. Beta Ltd makes a gross profit margin of 25% on all sales but has not yet raised any
invoices for this transaction.
Requirement:
Prepare the consolidated statement of financial position of Madina Ltd. as at 31 December 2018. 25
Page 3 of 4
5. (a) CB Ltd. is a reputed multinational company in Bangladesh. The company was initially registered as a private
limited company, but very recently the company was converted to a Public Limited Company. In the
process, the company had issued shares to a number of new investors.
The Head of Reporting of CB Ltd. has just completed preparing the consolidated financial statements of
the company. During the audit kick-off meeting, the newly appointed audit manager had asked if all the
related party disclosures have been properly made. The audit junior has raised question about adequacy
of related party disclosure in below circumstances:
i. Mr. C, who owns 51% share in the company has acquired 20% stake in BZ Limited. The audit
managers view is BZ Limited should be treated as a related party of CB Limited.
ii. CX is the only importer of raw material for the company. CB has a significant amount of dues to
CX. Mr. X, the Chair of CX, often visits CB Premises. During his last visit, he had visited company
warehouse and had warned management about the working environment at factory premises. The
audit manager asked why CX or Mr. X has not been considered as a related party.
iii. Mr. Z is appointed as the Chief Operating Officer. His wife, Mrs. P, has a raw material supply
contract with the company since long. However, upon appointment, Mr. Z, stopped ordering further
material from her company, lest it should be questioned by the board. The audit manager is
convinced that the contract needs to be disclosed. Mr. Z will not like to disclose such dormant
contract as a related party disclosure.
Requirements:
You, as a newly appointed professional accountant, were asked to advise if related party disclosure
would be needed in above cases. Share your advice and underlying justification. 2x3=6
(b) A Limited has prepared below Profit or Loss Statement for the year ended 30 June 2019.
A Limited
Statement of Profit or Loss
For the year ended 30 June 2019
Taka
Revenue 1,000,000
Cost of goods sold (250,000)
Gross profit 750,000
Operating expenses
Selling expense (120,000)
Advertisement, Promotion expense (270,000)
Administrative expense (300,000)
Total operating expenses (690,000)
Operating profit 60,000
Finance income, net 24,000
Profit before tax 84,000
Income tax expense -25,000
Net profit after tax 59,000
You are the engagement partner for the audit of the company. Your Engagement Manager is having a
review meeting with you where he has asked for your opinion on below matters:
a) One of the suppliers of A Limited has imposed penal interest of USD 10,000 due to delay in payment of
annual maintenance fees. The bank has denied to remit the amount without permission from the
Government. Historically, the Government has never allowed remittance against penal interest.
b) On September 30, the Government enacted a new environment law, by virtue of which local environment
office would be able to levy Taka 200 per Kg. of by-products from its manufacturing plant. Until 30 June
2019, the company had produced 1,000 KG of such by-product. No provision was made.
c) An item has been produced at a manufacturing cost of Taka 18,000 against a customer’s order at an
agreed price of Taka 23,000. The item was in inventory at the year-end awaiting delivery instructions.
In July 2019 the customer was declared bankrupt and the most reasonable course of action seems to be
to make a modification to the unit, costing approximately Taka 3,000, which is expected to make it
marketable to other customers at a price of about Taka 19,000.
Requirements:
Please give your opinion in each of the above cases, in light of IFRS. Also assist your manager in re-
constructing the Profit or Loss account. 3x3=9