°Y DETACHARLE asiaura PHiLosorHY (are) | eer. aa a | Manu hn 250 Marks perma wea fat Ie . “ae 28 Baek Prenfnirn fadatt A grrr ee usmtacveiaeriee ee suian a) ga via weil a oA EI seer ciert Late § of ac wrest weet AVE wR HS aR difrg | ete wea (arr & fg fer orm sare at fam rez | | Time Allowed : Three Hours a8 WR WT weit Ht oe din, set afesitnd 2, e) mn arr Tf Seth wart Bharat serge A ara | seifees es B fee ae wee A sere a A ERT at Te ee ae sees eae sem ye a fan, | ae QUESTION PAPER SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS Please read each of the following instructions carefully before attempting questions, There are EIGHT questions divided in Two Sections and printed both in HINDI and in ENGL Candidate has to attempt FIVE: questions in al Question Nos. 1 and $ are compulsory and out of the remaining, THREE. are to be attempted chao at least ONE question from each Section. ‘The number of marks carried by a question/pagtis indicated against it. ‘Answers must be written in the medium authorigad ig, the Admission C: clearly on the cover of this Question-cum-Answer(QyC:A) Booklet inthe sr be given for answers written in medium other, snc authorized one ‘Word limit in questions, wherever specified, should be 2 Attempts of questions shall be counted in Sequeggjat order. Unless struck off shall be counted even if attempted partly. Agy page or portion of the pay Question-cum-Answer Booklet must be clearly, ck of! rept of a question left blank in the 1 sth-p-phly—_—fS Pa ea = em dan mp Gonupl” pi pee 4) phalo 4 os \ ‘heap Digyt ode f? bj bea fos fats < o oO bee ‘ avs ‘A’ SECTION 5 aH 150. Write short swers ta the following in.about 150 won Lge Bt ames fh ere Af: er ae, ig identi | Biatiorate Hegel's dictum : “All identity a anda a et Hoge Foren Cgsplain Husserl’s reasons for advocating phenomenological reductionism fe 3 aman hp )) “Aue wqe a Ber oe a A RA ce ai a a tae? PP How is the “I met a man’, semantically problematic for Russell ? Haw does he account for the meanit 5 of this statement ? 10 far are were srerafeftotke Zea 2 gar al it oat Haare the Fat Rrarn frten me) (Gye Im what sense can ideas be both immanent ad this content Plato's theory of Is = 3 ve ite eh ar rv, fear fey ad Show how Hume's analysis am. 0 ground for belief in Ther physical or mental. sana, qgif\ ‘ite freee 8 gn fare Pia, fieg ‘ate mre ex seems fa ee . © 2 ar “wel Year aT Ue are 8" coe Saas aor oe aeeTTE Sia 7 are APA Sah How is “all bodies ate extended! an analytic judgement but ‘all bodies a heavy’ a synthetic judgement ? Is ‘every event has a cause’ an analytic or a synthetic ju mae ment ? Explain. 20 Facitrerat om ae ar fie cere en @ 7 8 Gren ee rae at ah ae anf & sce fg ay penta wo & a7 wren FP What is Witigenstein’s picture theory of meaning ? What are his reasons for giving up this theory and suggesting the use theory of meaning ? is = area: a fc hs me Feet sare sf ag oneq a a afters (afr) ow sealer FF 3% gare & fort ward rp 2 7 3 ‘of form and Matter, How does it help him resolve the problem of Explain Aristotle's theory | im rare ve aren 8 5 Ah aed & fog tat are & rere A eT * Seer Se Fa arate ware eens SNC SeaPTar BH Ah oa # 7 theory of space and time: How dogs this theo ‘ons can be both synthetic and a priori ? Elaborate Ki ry enable him to explain how mathematical proposit 20 2SRY) i reheated Ketan E28) | Ss ff so enhd timapl 7 por pee 4) ph, 4 | t > J he ¢ b saa | | Acspt . fon} ! D/ fase #5 mom és ka pan lens A > t worn 1 @ 7 oe afte afin geet cht arenes fap ‘Teil feet at fig a Rare a ween #2 Fn clear and distinct idea’? What i the epistemological net ideas ? Do. st ip Descartes prove that material objects exist ? Wouneisp Tre WaT Bere ate? fetta ea chitin — Cchuchls otto” Piricism that Quine attacks cording to Descarte: rand d + freg oe a What are the two dogmas of c What he calls the second de Aja) “Rie fra yan AR TT se are his argument: aa Pe ae 2 2 Te Te pT a wow at a ata af tg ac @ 7 Pron SAG How does Locké-draw a distinction between primary and secondary draw a distinction betweeg the of secondary qualities and S389 ‘ash via? ae free’, 3 ara Brea ait & wore ities ” Does he also primary qualities and primary qualities as well idea qualities ? Discuss. 20 aA origin facta A rae ae 4b) ed”, satisfy the criterion of meaningfulness Discuss Hei lost self? 1 Wve ‘BR’ = SECTION ‘B” 5. ‘Prairies & wate an aT 150 anet t afire see ST Write short answers to the following in about 150 words each Wx5=50 Sa), ‘teen a frie ep & srry sree pe ae" ee a a eter aA A asi Boe aE as) ok “The soul is nothing but conscious body." What are the reasons for Carvaka in holding this a) view? Bees a aaiften wala & agar send & araere mem ee 2 What are the necessary characteristics of padartha according to Vaidesika philosophy Sigh ame cal artes 2g (Ake Ba) A gat aren re), Explain the conditions of valid hetu as propounded in N} cirasergterroe:” 8 an amen B 7 Pega ort fitaa | iva philosophy, 0 sak yerat ar gala 3 ape = Premade dpayesye roy i yee 77> Explain fattavrtti ghd its effects accord rate 2 — feet ay * 1A aaron Fe eS es EE” yalalac acai b ser om lucidate the role of tuskori)h explaining th since ts thou, ic sth-p-phly6a wean fl wrt Explain the early Nyaya definition the later Naiya 6ipr iat arteaTe 1 neat: # The Jaina metaphysics is relativistic and realistic pluraticm” Discuss 6.(0) aera eh 3 fed aah ES 2 ay 8 ak hr (gama) ara at site a are What are the arguments of the Buddhists (0 establish eked 10 krianisa and akrtabhyupagama ? 15 raven wal waffem a Pron 2 Farad 8 fa FA Machyamikas, Yogaearavading and Sarvisivac | the namie of reality 7 How dogSarvastiy 1‘ knowledgeabil 7 =a J safer Berar St orqat at at ree a Ruts J How does Sri Aurobindo’s inte ee Adiscuss. \ faractarg wei aRorsare % ata erhaen-ae & ai Nf 8% OE TT, 3 A FERAA (stomus) & Tare HAA Fee ae Distinguish between vivartavada and parindmavada with reference to caus in the light of these theories §: wea 2? ae al yogathelp in the realization of supramental fife £3 eee at aw rrem eri on al exp nisi and Ramanuja differ on the siats of the v itr seqere ars 3 rere fares (reece) oft Ay srateon Htaten Fa at E 7 Explain the theory of Validity of Knowledge (pramanyavacs yey critic Nyaya theory of Va va did they criticize the Nyaya theory of Yaliginy 7 $s 8s) gene Hf eng & TT OST ABR ite expat St Fe ei Are ce 3 ed fare eae ore ara A TO a explain Ramanuja’s conception of God SI RRagins picts he faced in explaining he relation of God to matter and spirit be fete) areh serene rar TT OM hy fee TH eT every ay ears 7 Freran oif | ‘Given its theory of causation, is it possible fp ina world ? Discuss Sik wo ex _sth-p-phly