Student Course Assessment Survey (SCAS) Report for the

Instructor: Gabriel Redondo Andrade

Fall Semester 202010

College of Medicine

Course title: Primary Health Care & Rural Health

Section Number: 0 / TUT

Project Title: Student Course Assessment Survey (SCAS) - 202010

Courses Audience: 57
Responses Received: 39
Response Ratio: 68.42%

Report Comments

Analysis report of the Student Course Assessment Survey (SCAS):

Ajman University (AU) has developed and implemented assessment strategies and processes to regularly assess its academic
programs. In this regard, the Student Course Assessment Survey (SCAS) is used for assessing the courses and instructors as part of
the assessment and continuous improvement of all academic programs. The results of this report are included in the Instructor
Course Assessment Report (ICAR) that has to be submitted for each section at the end of the semester by the Course Instructor.

This report illustrates the Weighted Average/5 with the Course and Instructor for each question, which is based on the number of
responses received for each of the provided scales for each question. .

The scale used in the Survey is as follows:

(5) (4) (3) (2) (1)

Highly Satisfied Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Highly Dissatisfied

Prepared by: Amina Abousharkh

Creation Date: Wednesday, December 23, 2020
Sections included in this report:

1. Number of responding students Vs. Number of registered students to fill the survey:
This section includes a table of the number of students who responded to the survey Vs. the number of registered students, and the
response ratio.

2. Demographic information:
The gender breakdown of respondents is illustrated in this section.

3. Weighted Average Summary:

This section shows the Weighted Average/5 for each question, which is based on the number of responses received for each of the
scales provided.
The "Overall average of all questions" is displayed at the end of the table that represents the average score of all questions for each
section, which should be included in the ICAR.

Number of responding students Vs. Number of registered students to fill the survey:
Raters Students
Responded 39
Invited 57
Response Ratio 68.42%

Demographic Information
Gender Breakdown of Respondents

2/3
Weighted Average Summary:

c: Weighted Average/5 Summary for the Lab/Studio/Clinic related

questions
Weighted
Statement
Average/5
The lab/studio/clinic instructor presented the practical material well and clearly. 4.32
The instructor was well-prepared for the lab/studio/clinic sessions. 4.34
The instructor started and ended the lab/studio/clinic on time and was regular. 4.39
The instructor was fair in the evaluation of students’ work in lab/studio/clinic. 4.11
The instructor took interest in developing students’ practical skills and answered their questions. 4.21
The instructor evaluated the students’ work in a timely manner. 4.22
The equipment/components/material available in the lab/studio/clinic were sufficient and in good working
4.09
condition.
Overall, the instructor’s performance in the lab/studio/clinic was excellent. 4.18
Overall average of all questions 4.23

c: Comments and Suggestions related to the Lab/Studio/Clinic instructor

Comments
No comment

3/3