1. In this case, Mr.

X invited 15 individuals to his party in writing with proper invitation card

with a request to regret if they chooses not to attend the part or RSVP with a cell number. On
the day of the party, only 5 out of 15 people attended the party, and the rest of the people did
not inform that they will be unable to attend. As a result, Mr. X incurred a financial loss of
Tk. 75,000/- since he already paid for the food in advance. He is now eager to sue the ones
who did not attend his party as a breach of written contract.
However, legally, Mr. X cannot sue the ones who did not attend his party. According to The
Contract Act, 1872, in order to have a contract, there must be an agreement between the
parties intending to have a contract. But all agreements do not amount to a contract. If the
parties do not have any intentions to create a legal relationship between them, such
agreements are not contracts, rather social engagements. And, social engagements cannot be
enforced in the court of law.
4. According to Section 10, if an offer is not accepted within the prescribed time set by the
offeror, it lapses. Every offer remains open for a reasonable period of time only, and this
reasonable period varies within different kinds of contract.
5. According to the Contract act, if an acceptance letter somehow gets lost while being in
transmission process, there will in fact be a binding contract. If the offeror merely posts the
letter of acceptance, the acceptance is sufficiently communicated even though the letter may
not reach the offeree at all.

Tamim Zahed
ID:17304147