You are on page 1of 3

Naval War College Review

Volume 54
Article 25
Number 1 Winter

2001

Most Secret and Confidential: Intelligence in


theAge of Nelson,
Michael Riggle

Follow this and additional works at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review

Recommended Citation
Riggle, Michael (2001) "Most Secret and Confidential: Intelligence in theAge of Nelson,," Naval War College Review: Vol. 54 : No. 1 ,
Article 25.
Available at: https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol54/iss1/25

This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. It has been accepted for
inclusion in Naval War College Review by an authorized editor of U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons. For more information, please contact
repository.inquiries@usnwc.edu.
BOOK REVIEWS 175
Riggle: Most Secret and Confidential: Intelligence in theAge of Nelson,

of twentieth-century navies with the around the world, was able to provide a
same comprehensiveness. continuous flow of intelligence to the gov-
ernment, but it is fascinating to learn
JAMES GOLDRICK
Captain, Royal Australian Navy that by virtue of opening diplomatic and
personal mail, the British Post Office
became the largest intelligence-gather-
ing branch of the government.
Maffeo, Steven E. Most Secret and Confidential: In- Subsequent chapters treat other aspects of
telligence in the Age of Nelson. Annapolis, Md.: Na-
the British intelligence effort. The Admi-
val Institute Press, 2000. 355pp. $32.95
ralty’s collection and use of intelligence is
In Most Secret and Confidential, Steven discussed in depth, and so is the transmis-
Maffeo has written an exceptional study sion of information. The difficulties are
of how intelligence was collected and shown of sending any type of message, es-
used during the French Revolutionary pecially when the usual form of communi-
Wars and the Napoleonic Wars of the late cation at sea was signal flags, which were
eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries. useless at night or in limited visibility,
To limited degrees, the intelligence activi- such as in battle. The subject of several
ties of the United States, Spain, Russia, chapters is the commander as his own in-
Denmark, and several other European telligence officer. Some commanders, such
nations are described. More detail is pro- as Nelson, were expert intelligence offi-
vided concerning the excellent French in- cers; others were not. However, all com-
telligence efforts under Napoleon. The bulk manders had to sort through whatever
of the text, however, deals with the use of information was available to them and
intelligence by the British government, make the best decisions they could—they
especially the Admiralty, during the years were literally on their own. Communica-
between 1793 and 1815. tions between detached fleets and the Ad-
Maffeo, who is a commander in a naval miralty often took weeks, if not months.
reserve intelligence unit, has combined Commanders, therefore, without knowl-
his intelligence expertise with the skills edge of the current government policy,
of an accomplished historian to write would ultimately decide on courses of ac-
this informative and most enjoyable tion. The fact that they were fully sup-
history of British intelligence efforts ported by the Admiralty and the
during this period. His knowledge of government demonstrates the high level
the history of intelligence operations is of intelligence skills among the officers of
excellent, and his grasp of the British the Royal Navy.
navy of this era is unsurpassed. He uses The concluding chapters are case studies
not only primary sources (government that show what role intelligence, or the
papers and personal letters) to docu- lack thereof, played in three naval en-
ment his work but also the books of such gagements. They are remarkable summa-
novelists as C. S. Forester and Patrick tions of the Indian Ocean action of Pulo
O’Brian to make his points. Aur in February 1804, the Copenhagen
The opening chapter describes how the expedition of December 1800–April
British government collected intelli- 1801, and the Nile campaign of March
gence. It has been clear that Lloyd’s of through August 1798. These three chap-
London, by means of its agents located ters form an excellent conclusion.

Published by U.S. Naval War College Digital Commons, 2001 1


176 NAVAL WAR COLLEGE REVIEW
Naval War College Review, Vol. 54 [2001], No. 1, Art. 25

This is a must read for every intelligence substantiates that such fictional charac-
officer, and for any member of the mili- ters as Horatio Hornblower and Jack
tary who is interested in the history of in- Aubrey are soundly based on historical
telligence. It should also be on the fact, and that their activities, especially
reading list of every military and naval concerning intelligence, are authentic.
historian, most history buffs, and fans of
MICHAEL RIGGLE
naval fiction of this period. It Naval War College

https://digital-commons.usnwc.edu/nwc-review/vol54/iss1/25 2

You might also like