PROJEK JALAN AKSES KE EMPANGAN BALEH, BAHAGIAN KAPIT, SARAWAK PAKE] C (FASA 3) Summary of Non-Conformances in the Works (As of October 2020) Description of Non-Conformances | Contractor’s Response | Consultant’s Response + Contractor to justify Change of Design Slope to Normal Slope + Soil Nail Application with required where the Design Slope is steeper than \n of Soil Nail Notmal Slope of 1:1. Without Guniting due to It should be noted that Design Site Discussion with of Cut Slopes with slope Consultant RE. gradient of 4:1 were due to eG cut slope change to Normal Slope 2. Propose for Consultant to restrictions imposed by ROW, and application of Soil Nail without guni Issue Omission of Guniting and also due to high cut slope Works. at some locations. Hence, the 3. If Guniting Work is requirements for applications required, then Contractor of soll nails with gu to proceed. + If Contractor was able to cut the slopes with a gradient of 1:1 or flater, there may not have been a requirement to. apply soil nails with guniting.PROJEK JALAN AKSES KE EMPANGAN BALEH, BAHAGIAN KAPIT, SARAWAK PAKEJ C (FASA 3) Summary of Non-Conformances in the Works (As of October 2020) bor TaaT ste M ed Molt elfen ALCAN Le US ee os eli id ta Overcut on Norrnal cut slope from 2 tiers to 1. Contractorto rectifyasper + Reconstruct to Construction single tier Consultant Requirements. Drawing required profiles. = Contractor to justify Change of Design Slope to Normal Slope + Scil Nail Application with guniting is required where i the Design Slope is steeper Aether than Normal Slope of 1:1. Without Guniting due to : + Itshould be noted that Site Discussion with Design of Cut Slopes with consultant RE: slope gradient of 4:1 were 2. Propose for Consultant to ea Fi if due to restrictions imposed 2 Issue Omission of Guniting by ROW, and also due to high cut slope at some locations. Hence, the requirements for applications of soil nails with uniting. + If Contractor was able to cut the slopes with a gradient of 1:1 or flater, there may not have been a requirement to apply soil nails with guniting. Nail spacing and dimensions of Soil Head differs from design Works. If Guniting Work is required, then Contractor to proceed.PROJEK JALAN AKSES KE EMPANGAN BALEH, BAHAGIAN KAPIT, SARAWAK PAKEJ C (FASA 3) Summary of Non-Conformances in the Works (As of October 2020) Description of Non- CS Contractor’s Response Consultant’s Response en aura) 1, MSE Embankment completed. 2. Works at Site constructed F Change of MSE Embankment based on discussion with * Construction works are not ecco ai 2 Design requirer Consultant RE. to the Drawings. 3. Contractor to rectify any * Contractor is required to rectify. Defects as per Consultant Requirements. + The slope rectified fully 1, Contractor to rectify as per Contractor has identified Ref. Nos. 42 Consultant Requirements & 44 also under the subject. Such are related to Br. Sepanggil & Viaduct. Refer our comments under Item 17. res are required to be Normal cut slope failure. 4 Rectification works yet to be carried outPROJEK JALAN AKSES KE EMPANGAN BALEH, BAHAGIAN KAPIT, SARAWAK PAKEJ C (FASA 3) Summary of Non-Conformances in the Works (As of October 2020) >YCyolgl atte m o] Ce Tela} Coa Contractor’s Response Consultant’s Response * Contractor to justify Change of Design Slope to Normal Slope Nail Application with gunitingis required where the Design Slope is steeper than Normal Slope of 1:1. + It should be noted that Design of Cut Slopes with slope gradient of 4:1 were due to restrictions imposed by ROW, and also due to high cut slope ‘at some locations. Hence, the requirements for applications of soil nails with guniting. *+ If Contractor was able to cut the slopes with a gradient of 1:1 or flater, there may not have been a requirement to apply soil nails with guniting. 1. Application of Soil Nail Without Guniting due to Site Discussion with Consultant RE. a 2. Propose for Consultant to nall without guniting on normal cut Issue Omission of Guniting top) Works. 3. If Guniting Work is required, then Contractor to proceed.Coa Sa PROJEK JALAN AKSES KE EMPANGAN BALEH, BAHAGIAN KAPIT, SARAWAK PAKEJ C (FASA 3) Summary of Non-Conformances in the Works (As of October 2020) Description of Non-Conformances Change of horizontal alignment Localised slope failure on normal cut slope Cee ee To celac) ty oolat 1. Contractor has already completed the As Built Survey Works by a Licensed Surveyor. 2. The Horizontal Alignment is Within the ROW. 3. Consultant has engaged a 36 Party Consultant to verify the Safety Compliance of RSA. 1. Contractor to rectify as per Consultant Requirements. : Profe: Consultant’s Response Contractor should have notified SO his intention to deviate alignment during Construction Stage, justifying his intention for agreement. Itshould be Contractor's responsibility to engage a nal Engineer (PE) to prove to RSA that the deviated alignment can comply to RSA's safety requirements, with regards to road users driving safety, and safety and stability of as constructed road works both of LHS and RHS of the New Alignment. The slope failures are required to be rectified fully. Contractor has identified Ref. Nos. 42 & 44 also under the subject. Such are related to Br. Sepanggil & Viaduct. Refer our comments under Item 17.8,98&10 1 PROJEK JALAN AKSES KE EMPANGAN BALEH, BAHAGIAN KAPIT, SARAWAK PAKEJ C (FASA 3) Summary of Non-Conformances in the Works (As of October 2020) Description of Non-Conformances Application of Rock Pin with Guniting on slopes designed for Soil N: Normal cut slope overcut to a flat ground formation 3 tiers of fill embankment slope change to single tier of fill slope. Contractor’s Liye 1. Rock Pin was done Without Guniting. ACS has been Approved with All Documehtations in place (RFI and Rock Pin Logs al compiled in the QAQC and ACS) i 1. Contractor to submit Documents to show as evidence that the lagers requested for the Extended Cut for their Future Purpose. 2. Contractor to rectify any Defects as per Consultant Requirements. 1. Contractor to rectify as per Consultant Requirements. Cee yee Contractor to ju: change. Change of design requirement shall be as a proposal endorsed by a Professional Engineer (PE). Submission shall be to SO for his review. Contractor to submit Document(s) to SO to show evidence that over cut is due to Non-Com) Design. Reconstruction to construction drawing required profiles.PROJEK JALAN AKSES KE EMPANGAN BALEH, BAHAGIAN KAPIT, SARAWAK PAKEJ C (FASA 3) Summary of Non-Conformances in the Works (As of October 2020) DpYsrotg feel m Cela RT Tro Contractor’s stl ats Consultant’s Response 2 without soil nailing Bottom tiers of the cut slope are 2. Application of Soil Nail Without Guniting due to Site Discussion with Consultant RE. Propose for Consultant to Issue Omission of Guniting Works. If Guniting Work is required, then Contractor to proceed. Contractor is required to apply soil nails with uniting as per construction drawing. ‘SOR2's Assessment of ACS for soil nail and guniting works as of October 2020 identifies Provisional Quantities have not been exceeded, Guniting works shall be carried out as a combined activity with soil nailing. As such 1g works cannot be deleted where soil nailing is designed for cut slopes. Any change to soil nailing activity on cut slopes requires to be justified by the Contractor, and should be as a proposal endorsed by a Professional Engineer (PE), if Soil Nailing with Guniting Works are to be omitted. If the Contractor foresee that the Provisional Quantities allocated for soil nail and guniting works will be exceeded during application process, he is required to inform SO in wr before exceeding the allocated quantities.14 PROJEK JALAN AKSES KE EMPANGAN BALEH, BAHAGIAN KAPIT, SARAWAK PAKEJ C (FASA 3) Summary of Non-Conformances in the Works (As of October 2020) beytteg lle Celie CCT LUE} Contractor’s Response insultant’s Response Soil nail cut slope change to normal cut slope Change of spur road location on Application of Soil Nail Without Guniting due to Site Discussion with Consultant RE, Propose for Consultant to Issue Omission of Guniting Works. If Guniting Work is required, then Contractor to proceed. The changed of Spur Road Location was a Request by the Tuai Rumah. Consultant RE also aware. Contractor to provide evidence (Letter from Tuai Rumah). Contractor to justify Change of Design Slope to Normal Slope Soil Nail Application with guniting is required where the Design Slope is steeper than Normal Slope of 1:1. It should be noted that Design of Cut Slopes with slope gradient of 4:1 were due to restrictions imposed by ROW, and also due to high cut slope at some locations. Hence, the requirements for applications of soil nails with guniting Hf Contractor was able to cut the slopes with a gradient of 1:1 or flater, there may not have been a requirement to apply with guniting, Contractor to justify by notifying SO of “Tuai Rumah’s” request with evidence (letters, etc.)ES Description of Non-Conformances 15 16 aw PROJEK JALAN AKSES KE EMPANGAN BALEH, BAHAGIAN KAPIT, SARAWAK PAKEJ C (FASA 3) Summary of Non-Conformances in the Works (As of October 2020) 5 tiers of embankment fill slope change to 2 tiers of fil slope without complying to design requirements shown in the construction drawing. 3 tiers of cut slope overcut to single tier cut slope. Loose earth material from cut slope dumping without compaction and proper slope formation (etic lace) Response «Contractor to rectify as per Consultant Requirements. |. Contractor to rectify as per Consultant Requirements, - Contractor to trim the erosion of loose materials and make good on the Slope. . Contractor to desilt the Road Side Drains. ole besa} Response + Reconstruct to construction drawing required profiles. * Reconstruct to construction drawing required profiles. + Contractor to attend to Triming & Compaction of the loose fill and apply turfing to exposed surfaces ‘on completion, to SO’s satisfaction.18 PROJEK JALAN AKSES KE EMPANGAN BALEH, BAHAGIAN KAPIT, SARAWAK PAKEJ C (FASA 3) Summary of Non-Conformances in the Works (As of October 2020) Description of Non- feted elias Cel irra cl m Co ela Consultant’s Response + Soil Nailing with guniting not applied at the middle tier + Slope failure observed on middle tiers. + Soil Nailing without guniting observed on top tiers . 1. Application of Soil Nail Without Guniting due to Site Discussion with Consultant RE. : Propose for Consultant to Issue Omission of Guniting Works. If Guniting Work is required, then Contractor to proceed. Contractor to rectify as per Consultant Requirements. Contractor is required to apply soil nails with gu as per construction drawing. ‘SOR2’s Assessment of ACS for soil nail and gur works as of October 2020 identifies Provisional Quantities have not been exceeded. ing works shall be carried out as a combined activity with soil nailing. As such guniting works cannot be deleted where soil nailing is designed for cut slopes. requires to be justified by the Contractor, and should be as a proposal endorsed by @ Professional Engineer (PE), if Soil N omitted. Ifthe Contractor foresee that the Provi ‘Quantities allocated for soil nail and guniting works be exceeded during application process, he is required to inform SO in writing before exceeding the allocated quantities. The slope failures are required to be rectified fully, Contractor has identified Ref. Nos. 42 & 44 also under the subject. Such are related to Br. Sepanggil & Viaduct. Refer our comments under Item 17,Loa 19, 20 20a PROJEK JALAN AKSES KE EMPANGAN BALEH, BAHAGIAN KAPIT, SARAWAK PAKE) C(FASA 3) Summary of Non-Conforma (As of October 2020) ysraal li leh Nerd Levies Rouen Normal cut slope overcut to single tier. Change of vertical alignment at the approach to bridge. Contractor’s Lit Yeye to) 1 Contractor to rectify as er Consultant Requirements, Contractor has already completed the As Built Survey Works by a Ucensed Surveyor, The Vertical Alignment is Within the Row, Consultant has engaged a 314 Party Consultant to verify the Safety Compliance of RSA. nces in the Works Leones Lith sTen tad Reconstruct to Construction Drawing required Profiles, intention to deviate alignment during Construction Stage, Justifying his intention for agreement, It should be Contractor's esponsibility to engage a Professional Engineer (PE) to prove to Rn that the Gleviated alignment can comply to RSA. safety requirements, with regards to road users driving safety, and safety and stability of as Constructed road ‘works both on LHS and RHS of the New Alignment.PROJEK JALAN AKSES KE EMPANGAN BALEH, BAHAGIAN Kap Summary of Non-Conformanc (As of October 2020) Description of Non- Contractor’s LIT) Conformances 1. Contractor has already completed the As Built Survey Works by a Licensed Surveyor. 20p Change of horizontal alignment of 2. The Horizontal Alignment is approach to the bridge Within the Row, 3. Consultant has engaged a 3 Party Consultant to verify the Safety Compliance of RSA. 1. Contractor constructed the Rock Fil, 2. Works at Site constructed based on discussion with Consultant RE. 3. Contractor to rectify any Defects as per Consultant Requirements. Rock fill embankment change to normal fill embankment 20¢ IT, SARAWAK PAKEJC (FASA 3) es in the Works Consultant’s Leena Contractor should have Notified SO his intention to deviate alignment during Construction Stage, justifying his intention for agreement. It should be Contractor's responsi engage a Professional Engineer (PE) to Prove to RSA that the deviated alignment Gan comply to RSA\s safety requirements, with regards to road users driving safety, and safety and stability of as constructed road works both on LHS and RHS of the New Alignment, Contractor is required to engage a Professional Engineer (PE) to submit an endorsed New Design to SO, if the pustructed works differs from the Design Drawings. Cross section of As-Constructed Embankment Slopes requires to be Provided to SO for review,PROJEK JALAN AKSES KE EMPANGAN BALEH, BAHAGIAN KAPIT, SARAWAK PAKEJ C (FASA 3) Summary of Non-Conformances in the Works (As of October 2020) Description of Non- ee UU) Ceara Cee Cee el a Soil nail cut slope not done 21 3. Application of Soil Ni Without Guniting due to Site Discussion with Consultant RE, Propose for Consultant to Issue Omission of Guniting Works. If Guniting Work is required, then Contractor to proceed. Contractor is required to apply soil n with guniting as per construction drawing. SOR2's Assessment of ACS for soil nail and guniting works as of October 2020 identifies Provisional Quantities have not been exceeded. Guniting works shall be carried out as a combined activity with soil nailing. As such guniting works cannot be deleted where soil nailing is designed for cut slopes. Any change to soil nailing activity on cut slopes requires to be justified by the Contractor, and should be as a proposal be omitted. If the Contractor foresee that the Provisional Quantities allocated for soil ye exceeded hes required in writing before exceeding the allocated quantities.Cot 21a PROJEK JALAN AKSES KE EMPANGAN BALEH, BAHAGIAN KAPIT, SARAWAK PAKEJ C (FASA 3) Summary of Non-Conformances in the Works (As of October 2020) Description of Non- Cen lire} Change of horizontal alignment Soil nail cut slope change to normal cut slope 1 Ze ontractor’s Response Contractor has already _completed the As Built “Survey Works by a Licensed Surveyor. The Horizontal Alignment is Within the ROW. Consultant has engaged a 3" Party Consultant to verify ‘the Safety Compliance of RSA. Application of Soil Nai Without Guniting due to Site Discussion with Consultant RE. Propose for Consultant to Issue Omission of Guniting Works. If Guniting Work is required, then Contractor to proceed. Consultant’s Response Contractor should have notified SO his intention to deviate alignment during Construction Stage, justifying his intention for agreement. It should be Contractor's responsi engage a Professional Engineer (PE) to prove to RSA that the deviated alignment can comply to RSA’s safety requirements, with regards to road users driving safety, and safety and stability of as constructed road works both on LHS and RHS of the New Alignment. Contractor to justify Change of Design Slope to Normal Slope Soil Nail Application with guniting is steeper than Normal Slope of 1:1 It should be noted that Design of Cut Slopes with slope gradient of 4:1 were due to restrictions imposed by ROW, and also due to high cut slope at some locations. Hence, the requirements for appl of soil nails with guniting. If Contractor was able to cut the slopes with a gradient of 1:1 or flater, there may not have been a requirement to apply soi nails with guniti| ei 23 PROJEK JALAN AKSES KE EMPANGAN BALEH, BAHAGIAN KAPIT, SARAWAK PAKEJ C (FASA 3) Summary of Non-Conformances in the Works Description of Non- ei US Soil nail cut slope change to normal cut slope without RC. bench drains Application of rock bolt and / or soil nail without guniting. (As of October 2020) Cte CaCle ae 1. Application of Soil Nail Without Guniting due to Site Discussion with Consultant RE. 2. Propose for Consultant to Issue Omission of Guniting Works. 3. If Guniting Work is required, then Contractor to proceed. Consultant’s Response Contractor to justify Slope to Normal Slope Soil Nail Application with guniti required where the Design Slope is. steeper than Normal Slope of 1:1. It should be noted that Design of Cut Slopes with slope gradient of 4:1 were due to restrictions imposed by ROW, and also due to high cut slope at some locations. Hence, the requirements for applications of soil nails with guniting. If Contractor was able to cut the slopes with a gradient of 1:1 or flater, there may not have been a requirement to apply soi nails with guniting.PROJEK JALAN AKSES KE EMPANGAN BALEH, BAHAGIAN KAPIT, SARAWAK PAKEJ C (FASA 3) Summary of Non-Conformances in the Works (As of October 2020) Description of Non- Contractor’s 5 ean Li Consultant’s Response Conformances Lh Teli 1, Contractor Waiting for New Proposal from its * Contractor to justify Design Change. eee eronmall Geotechnical Consultant. + Proposal for the change is required to be. awe i 2. Propose for Rectification provided to SO for review, if Contractor intends to 23a Over dumping of fill material 7 : withodl Broper comaeaion at Works to be carried out adopt a Design Change. Proposal shall be within bliin scl into the DLP. an endorsement by a Professional Engineer (PE) 3. Contractor to provide a together with design calculations. Letter of Undertaking. * Contractor to justify Change of Design Slope to Normal Slope 1. Application of Soil ait _-*--S0l! Nail Application with gunitingis required where the Design Slope is steeper than Normal Without Guniting due to Seer ae ih + Itshould be noted that Design of Cut Slopes with 2. Propose for Consultantto __S!0Pe gradient of 4:1 were due to restrictions Soil nail cut slope change to ae imposed by ROW, and also due to high cut slope normal cut slope without RC nthe at some locations. Hence, the requirements for 24 bench drains. met ‘ applications of soil nails with guniting. 3. If Guniting Work is. required, then Contractor to proceed 4. Contractor to rectify as per Consultant Requirements, + If Contractor was able to cut the slopes with a gradient of 1:1 or flater, there may not have been a requirement to apply soil nails with guniting. + The slope failures are required to be rectified full * Contractor has identified Ref. Nos. 42 & 44 also under the subject. Such are related to Br. Sepanggil & Viaduct. Refer our comments under Item 17. Localise slope failures observed.PROJEK JALAN AKSES KE EMPANGAN BALEH, BAHAGIAN KAPIT, SARAWAK PAKEJ C (FASA 3) Summary of Non-Conformances in the Works (As of October 2020) Contractor’s Consultant’s Response Ceol as Response * Contractor to justify Change of Design Slope to Normal Slope + Soil Nail Application with guniting is required 1. Application of Soil Nail Without Guniting dueto where the Design Slope is steeper than Normal Slope of 1:1. Sane ae Ko) 3 pe to‘ Itshould be noted that Design of Cut Slopes with 25(1) application of rock bolt/soil nail Issue Omission of stovesralent) 41 pe due foretcions re Saar! imposed by ROW, and also due to high cut slope ieee asee at some locations. Hence, the requirements for - ut 4 ute Contractor __@PPlications of soil nails with guni fe reese + If Contractor was able to cut the slopes with a Er gradient of 1:1 oF flater, there may not have been a requirement to apply soil nails 1. Contractor We New Proposal from its Very high and steep cut slope Geotechnical Consultant. Very high and steep cut slopes requires to be f 2. Propose for Rectification 25(2) not cut according to recut to Design profiles shown in the Works to be carried out into the DLP. 3. Contractor to provide a Letter of Undertaking. construction drawing Construction Drawings.PROJEK JALAN AKSES KE EMPANGAN BALEH, BAHAGIAN KAPIT, SARAWAK PAKEJ C (FASA 3) Summary of Non-Conformances in the Works (As of October 2020) Es Loy Syoig | oh e(eSa mem Cols) Contractor’s ener oe Conformances Response 1. Contractor has already + Contractor should have notified SO his intention completed the As Built to deviate alignment during Construction Stage, Survey Works by a ing his interition for agreement. Licensed Surveyor. + Ithould be Contractor's responsibility to engage 4 5: 2. TheHorizontal Alignment a Professional Engineer (PE) to prove to RSA that a hea Tonos Reno Deas is Within the ROW. the deviated aligriment can comply to RSA’s 3. Consultanthasengageda safety requirements, with regards to road users 3° Party Consultant to driving safety, and safety and stability of as verify the Safety constructed road works both on LHS and RHS of Compliance of RSA. the New Alignment. 1. Contractor Waiting for. Construction works shall be according to the New Proposal from its ae RC retaining wall change to Geotechnical Consultant. Cortrnctor may make a design change proposal, asp -hormalembankment filand 2. Propose for Rectification Fe SEH te SOc ROSIE RSIS over dumping of fill materi Works to be carried out es esaional Eeaicos (ool Ree tr road level. into the DLP. Contractor, with the new design endorsed by PE. 3. Contractor te id ees Submission shall be to SO for review. Letter of Undertaking.27 PROJEK JALAN AKSES KE EMPANGAN BALEH, BAHAGIAN KAPIT, SARAWAK PAKEJ C (FASA 3) Summary of Non-Conformances in the Works Description of Non- Ce laure (As of October 2020) Contractor’s Response Consultant’s Response Change of vertical alignment of the bridge. nail cut slope change to normal cut slope and application of soil nai and/or rock bolt without guniting. By 2 3. Contractor has alread completed the As Bui Survey Works by a Licensed Surveyor. . The Vertical Alignment is Within the ROW. Consultanthas engageda + 3" Party Consultant to verify the Safety Compliance of RSA. Application of Soil Nail Without Guniting due to . Site Discussion with Consultant RE. . Propose for Consultant to Issue Omission of Guniting Works. If Guniting Work is required, then Contractor = to proceed. Identification of Ref. No. 26, which relates to Vertical, Profiles of the Bridge & Viaduct under this activity No. 10 relating to Road Works, is inappropriate. Such is commented upon by SOR2 under Item 17. Contractor is required to confirm that as constructed vertical profiles of the Bridge and Viaduct are as per Design. Any deviation(s) shall be checked by a Professional, Engineer (PE) with Bridge Design experience, and a proposal for rectifications shall be provided to SO for review, if deemed necessary. A report with endorsement is to be provided by the PE. Contractor to justify Change of Design Slope to Normal Slope Soil Nail Application with guniting is required where the Design Slope is steeper than Normal Slope of 1: It should be noted that Design of Cut Slopes with slope gradient of 4:1 were due to restrictions imposed by ROW, and also due to high cut slope at some locations. Hence, the requirements for applications of soil nai with guniting. If Contractor was able to cut the slopes with a gradient of 1:1 or flater, there may not have been a requirement to apply soil nails with guniting.PROJEK JALAN AKSES KE EMPANGAN BALEH, BAHAGIAN KAPIT, SARAWAK PAKEJ C (FASA 3) Summary of Non-Conformances in the Works (As of October 2020) Description of Non- (Tara M oo elie Consultant’s Response Cetera 1. Contractor Waiting for New. Proposal fromh its Very high and steep slope, Sectech ; 2. Propose for Rectification * Very high and steep cut slopes requires to be recut to 27a beside one side of bridge y . < Works to be carried out into Design profiles shown in the Construction Drawings. abutment the DLP. 3. Contractor to provide a Letter of Undertaking. 1. Contractor has already completed the As Buil * Contractor should have notified SO his intention to Survey Works bya Licensed deviate alignment during Construction Stage, justifying Surveyor. his intention for agreement. Change of horizontal 2. The Vertical Alignment is * It should be Contractor’s responsibility to engage a 27b alignment approach to the Within the ROW. Professional Engineer (PE) to prove to RSA that the bridge 3. Consultant has engaged a deviated alignment can comply to RSA’s safety 3 party Consultant to requirements, with regards to road users di verify the Safety safety, and safety and stability of as constructed road Compliance of RSA. works both on LHS and RHS of the New Alignment. tiers cut slope overcut to 1. Contractor to rectify as per 28 Rake i single tier Consultant Requirements. + Reconstruct to Construction Drawing required profiles.PROJEK JALAN AKSES KE EMPANGAN BALEH, BAHAGIAN KAPIT, SARAWAK PAKEJ C (FASA 3) Summary of Non-Conformances in the Works (As of October 2020) Description of Non- Cee Tau) Contractor’s Response Consultant’s Response eS Comractor has already * Contractor should have notified SO his intention to completed the As Built fyi Survey Works by a Licensed poe alignment during Construction Stage, justifying Stevan saree for agreement. i A as + Itshould be Contractor's responsibility to engage a Change of the horizontal 2. The Vertical Alignment is " - 29 uctech he reaal Seni nenon Professional Engineer (PE) to prove to RSA that the deviated alignment can comply to RSA’s safety requirements, with regards to road users driving safety, and safety and stability of as constructed road works both on LHS and RHS of the New Alignment. 3. Consultant has engaged a 3% Party Consultant to verify the Safety Compliance of RSA. 1. Contractor constructed the Rock Fil + Contractor is required to engage a Professional Gabion wall and rock fil 2" Works at Site constructed Engineer (PE) to submit an endorsed New Design to based on discussion with SO, if the constructed works differs from the Design 29a change to normal Consultant RE. Drawings. embankment fl rl 3. Contractorto rectify any Cross section of As-Constructed Embankment Slopes Defects as per Consultant requires to be provided to SO for review. Requirements.30, 31, 32, 33 34 PROJEK JALAN AKSES KE EMPANGAN BALEH, BAHAGIAN KAPIT, SARAWAK PAKEJ C (FASA 3) Summary of Non-Conformances in the Works Description of Non- Ceol aay Cut slope overcut to single tier cut slope Soil nail cut slope change to normal cut slope Application of si without guniting. nail (As of October 2020) Cee lacl eM Cy Lely Contractor to rectify as per Consultant Requirements. Without Guniting due to Site Discussion with Consultant RE. Propose for Consultant to Issue Omission of Gur Works. If Guniting Work is required, then Contractor to proceed. Consultant’s Response Reconstruct to Construction Drawing required profiles. Contractor to justify Change of Design Slope to Normal Slope Soil Nail Application with guniting is required where the Design Slope is steeper than Normal Slope of 1:1. It should be noted that Design of Cut Slopes with slope gradient of 4:1 were due to restrictions imposed by ROW, and also due to high cut slope at some locations. Hence, the requirements for applications of soil nails with guniting. If Contractor was able to cut the slopes with a gradient of 1:1 or flater, there may not have been a requirement to apply soil nails with guniting.35 36 37 PROJEK JALAN AKSES KE EMPANGAN BALEH, BAHAGIAN KAPIT, SARAWAK PAKEJ C (FASA 3) Summary of Non-Conformances in the Works Dyas Lia Cera) (As of October 2020) (Ciera oo ea Cee cae ely Single tier of Soil nail cut slope change to 5 tiers of normal cut slope MSE wall change to normal fill embankment Rock fill embankment change to normal fill embankment Application of Soil Nail Without Guniting due to Site Discussion with Consultant RE. Propose for Consultant to Issue ‘Omission of Guniting Works. If Guniting Work is required, then Contractor to proceed. Contractor Waiting for New Proposal from its Geotechnical Consultant. Propose for Rectification Works to be carried out into the DLP. Contractor to provide a Letter of Undertaking. Contractor constructed the Rock ‘Works at Site constructed based on discussion with Consultant RE. Contractor to rectify any Defects as per Consultant Requirements. Contractor to justify Change of Design Slone to Normal Slope Soil Nail Application with guniting is required where the Design Slope is steeper than Normal Slope of 1:1. It should be noted that Design of Cut Slopes with slope gradient of 4:1 were due to restrictions imposed by ROW, and also due to high cut slope at some locations. Hence, the requirements for applications of soil nails with guniting. If Contractor was able to cut the slopes with a gradient of 1:1 or flater, there may not have been a requirement to apply soil nails with guniting. Contractor to justify Design Change. Proposal for the change is required to be provided to SO for review, if Contractor intends to adopt a Design Change. Proposal shall be within an endorsement by a Professional Engineer (PE) together with design calculations. Contractor is required to engage a Professional Engineer (PE) to submit an endorsed New Design to SO, if the constructed works differs from the Design Drawings. Cross section of As-Constructed Embankment Slopes requires to be provided to SO for review.38 39 40 PROJEK JALAN AKSES KE EMPANGAN BALEH, BAHAGIAN KAPIT, SARAWAK PAKEJ C (FASA 3) Summary of Non-Conformances in the Works (As of October 2020) Det oa oa Leen tc Taco Xo lel d Ce ie a) rs elel ght d Gabion mattress with a layer geotextile and gabion box wall with geotextile not constructed as per drawing observed that the pile cap level is higher than the level designed for it. We observe erosion in front of pile cap taking place and eventual collapse o* pile cap foundation can be expected. Gabion mattress with a layer geotextile and gabion box wall with geotextile not constructed as per drawing. 1, Contractor to rectify as per Consultant Requirements. 1. Contractor to rectify as per Consultant Requirements. 1. Contractor to rectify as per Consultant Requirements. Contractor to construct as per construction drawing. Contractor to confirm that the pile cap level is as per design. Heavy erosion is required to be rectified soonest. Contractor to construct as per construction drawing.PROJEK JALAN AKSES KE EMPANGAN BALEH, BAHAGIAN KAPIT, SARAWAK PAKEJ C (FASA 3) Summary of Non-Conformances in the Works (As of October 2020) Leela clay Description of Non-Conformances Consultant’s Response Response + Identification of Ref. No. 26 and 41, which relates to Vertical Profiles of the Bridge & Viaduct under this 1. Contractor has already ac ity No. 10 relating to Road Works, completed the As Built is inappropriate. Such is commented Survey Works by a upon by SOR2 under Item 17. tae eeat SS ae eae Licensed Surveyor. + Contractor is required to confirm that 5 2. The Vertical Alignment is as constructed vertical profiles of the 41 the top levels of the abutments and the piers. j : : : Within the ROW. Bridge and Viaduct are as per Design. ae 3. Consultant has engaged + Any deviation(s) shall be checked by a 23% Party Consultantto __Professional Engineer (PE) with Bridge verify the Safety Design experience, and a proposal for Compliance of RSA. rectifications shall be provided to SO for review, if deemed necessary. A report with endorsement is to be provided by the PE. 1. Contractor to rectify as per Consultant * Contractor to rectify erosions soonest. Requirements, Ground profile seem to have eroded 42 Immediate rectification of slope is requiredPROJEK JALAN AKSES KE EMPANGAN BALEH, BAHAGIAN KAPIT, SARAWAK PAKEJ C (FASA 3) Summary of Non-Conformances in the Works (As of October 2020) celiac la celacy Peco ET Tc Ua Response Pyles) ion of Non-Conformances Roadside drain incomplete. Water drainage diverted 1. Contractor to rectify as 8 towards pier 1 may give rise to erosion of earthwork per Consultant surrounding pier 1. Requirements. * Contractor to complete drainage works Heavy erosion is observed to take place at the location. 1 Sontractortorectifyas * Contractor to rectify iy Immediate rectification is required per Consultant erosions soonest. Requirements. Formworks left underneath the bridge deck requires to. + Comtractortorectifyas . Contractor to remove 45 per Consultant be removed ‘temporary formwork. Requirements.