Professional Documents
Culture Documents
LK6
LK6
« Archives, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63,
64, 65, 66
Centralized discussion
Contents
1 Virtual Asia-Pacific Wikipedia 20 CentralNotice for regional editors
2 Sorry for disturbing...
3 Stanford Article About Inauthentic Editing on Wikipedia
4 Want to ask NASA a question?
5 Category of G7 nominations
6 Looking for examples of good feedback on bad and mediocre articles
7 Login attemps
If you have questions to submit, please respond below or send them to me via email
by Sunday, 10 January (UTC). Thank you! Ed Erhart (WMF) (talk) 22:51, 7 January
2021 (UTC)
Please do post any questions you have ASAP - I'm finalising the list this weekend
and welcome community input. Modest Genius talk 12:24, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Category of G7 nominations
This category is exclusively comprised of transclusions of the main AfD log, which
by definition is not supposed to be deleted, and it does not even transclude the G7
template, nor even mention G7. JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 13:27, 8
January 2021 (UTC)
That category looks empty to me? Majavah (talk!) 13:30, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Majavah, it was not empty when I saw it for some reason, but it now is.
JJP...MASTER![talk to] JJP... master? 13:37, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Looking for examples of good feedback on bad and mediocre articles
I'm working on a revamp of some of the instructions for student editors in Wiki
Education courses, specifically for when they are assigned to either evaluate an
article (as an early assignment to learn about Wikipedia article quality standards
and think critically about content and sources) or to peer review a classmate's
draft work. I want to include links to a collection of examples of the kinds of
useful and substantive feedback they should be aiming for, and I want to cover a
range of quality levels and article topics. It's easy to find good examples for
really well-deleveloped articles (for example, in GA and FA reviews), but I'm
having trouble finding a diverse range of examples of good feedback for articles in
the Start to B range.
@Sage (Wiki Ed): The permanent revisions at WP:VG/A#Quality scale are some nice
sets (I do not know what the present quality is on those). I can also offer some of
the articles I've worked on: Master_X_Master (needs updating both for time passage
and for the reception from other sources even from the time that I wrote it),
Call_to_Arms_(video_game) (similar), Quality_function_deployment for significantly
lacking coverage (and indeed you could probably pick out several engineering topics
that are lacking citations or sufficient coverage or both). --Izno (talk) 21:26, 8
January 2021 (UTC)
Login attemps
There have been over 2000 attempts to log in to my account in the last day.
Usually, it is just a couple a week. Wondering if anyone else is seeing activity
like this... --SamuelWantman 21:50, 9 January 2021 (UTC)
Languages
العربية
Español
Bahasa Indonesia
Jawa
Bahasa Melayu
Português
Русский
اردو
中文
51 more
Edit links
This page was last edited on 9 January 2021, at 21:57 (UTC).
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License;
additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and
Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation,
Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policyAbout WikipediaDisclaimersContact WikipediaMobile
viewDevelopersStatisticsCookie statementWikimedia FoundationPowered by MediaWiki