Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Antiplatelet Therapies
2015
Joseph M. Sweeny, MD
Assistant Professor of Medicine
Division of Cardiology
Interventional Cardiology, Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory
Mount Sinai School of Medicine
Mount Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York
Key References
• Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice
Guidelines Replacing the 2011 Focused Update): A Report of the
American College of Cardiology Unstable Angina/Non-ST-Elevation
Myocardial Infarction (Updating the 2007 Guidelines) Circulation.
2012;126:875-910
• N= 26,449
• Prior MI, CVA or PAD
• 2.5mg vs placebo
• Mod/severe bleeding 4.2% vs 2.5% (increase ICH), ~80% prior MI on DAPT
Vorapaxar (Zontivity)
TRACER Trial
• N=12,944 with ACS
• 1°EP in 18.5% vs 19.9% (P=0.07)
Clumping
Anucleated
Disc shaped cell fragments
Circulate
Source of GF (Granules) CF 5, 8
ADP, ATP
TxA2, Fib
Receptors:
GP 2B/3A,P2Y12
TxA2
PAR-1
• Abciximab a potent
platelet inhibitor
(aggregation)
• 8555 patients
undergoing PCI
• Risk of hemorrhagic or
non hemorrhagic CVA at
30 days. No difference
• Standard vs low dose
heparin 100 vs 70U/kg)
Very
Late ST
(>1 yr)
Late ST
(1-12months)
Subacute ST
(24h to 30d)
Acute ST
(<24 hours)
Limited DAPT duration Indefinite DAPT duration
Primary Endpoint
Overall Death, MI or CVA
CEC adjudicated
24 mo DAPT 6 mo DAPT
12
10.1
No benefit by prolonging DAPT treatment 10.0
8
P=0.91
%
P=0.00018
8
Questions if initial recs overemphasized 7.4
the benefit over the risk of long-term DAPT
%
4
3.5
12M DAPT
10 P = 0.86 P = 0.91
HR 1.03 HR 1.03
(0.71 – 1.51) (0.66 – 1.60)
5
3.5
3.3 2.6
2.6
0
0 3 6 9 12
Time After Initial Procedure (Months)
Month 0 1 3 6 12
No. at risk 1563 1520 1504 1468 1384
No. events 18 25 11 18 21
No. at risk 1556 1514 1497 1466 1381
No. events 16 25 11 16 22
Dual antiplatelet therapy beyond 1 year after placement of a drug-eluting stent, as compared
with aspirin therapy alone, significantly reduced the risks of stent thrombosis and major adverse
cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events but was associated with an increased risk of bleeding.
Relative
0.12 + Aspirin Risk
(n=6303) Reduction
0.10
0.08
Clopidogrel
0.06 + Aspirin P < 0.001
(n=6259) N=12,562
0.04
0.02
Higher bleeding complications 8.5 vs. 5.0, p < 0.001
0.00
0 3 6 9 12
Months of Follow-up
• Prolonged antiplatelet
effect
• More consistent
antiplatelet activity
Intestine
(60%)
↓138 events
HR 0.81
(0.73-0.90)
(CV death, MI, stroke, %)
P=0.0004
10
Primary Endpoint
NNT = 46
No hepatic
activation
3 Ticagrelor
3
0
0
0 60 120 180 240 300 360 0 60 120 180 240 300 360
Days after Randomization Days after Randomization
NEJM 2009;361:1045
Question 9
• Which of the following are true regarding
platelet reactivity testing in routine clinical
practice?
A) The utility of Platelet reactivity testing has been
validated in randomized clinical trials.
B) Patients with High on Treatment Platelet
Reactivity (HTPR) have a higher CV event rate.
C) Increasing Clopidogrel dosing has been shown
to reduce CV events in patient with HTPR.
D) Switching from Clopidogrel to Prasugrel or
Ticagrelor has been shown to reduce CV
events in HTPR.
Question 9
• Which of the following are true regarding
platelet reactivity testing in routine clinical
practice?
A) The utility of Platelet reactivity testing has been
validated in randomized clinical trials.
B) Patients with High on Treatment Platelet
Reactivity (HTPR) have a higher CV event rate.
C) Increasing Clopidogrel dosing has been shown
to reduce CV events in patient with HTPR.
D) Switching from Clopidogrel to Prasugrel or
Ticagrelor has been shown to reduce CV
events in HTPR.
Variable Response to Clopidogrel
4
• Same rate of CV death, MI, or stent
thrombosis in 2 groups (P = 0.98)
(P = 0.98)
• GUSTO moderate or severe bleeding:
1.4% HD vs. 2.3% standard, respectively
2.3 2.3
(P = 0.10)
2
Conclusions
• Patients with high residual platelet
reactivity after PCI with DES did not
benefit from high-dose clopidogrel
0
primary outcome
• High-dose clopidogrel for 6 months did
High Standard not reduce the primary ischemic outcome
clopidogrel clopidogrel dose
dose • GUSTO moderate or severe bleeding was
not increased
ARCTIC TRIAL 2012 • Routine testing of platelet reactivity after
Personalized medicine is an important goal for both patients
And physicians, but it appears that it is difficult goal to reach PCI is not warranted
for antiplatelet therapy
10 P = 0.01 reduced-function
9 allele
8.0 2
8
7 P = 0.02
6 Non-carriers of 2C19
reduced-function allele
5
Non-carriers of 2C19
4 1 reduced-function allele 0.8
3
2
1
0 0
0 30 90 180 270 360 450 0 30 90 180 270 360 450
Days Since Randomization Days Since Randomization
• Clopidogrel 75 mg daily; or
• Prasugrel 10 mg daily; or
• Ticagrelor 90 mg twice a day*
Randomize < 24 h
Start/Continue Clopidogrel < 24 h
Randomize between
Clopidogrel Prasugrel 1-7 days
300 mg LD 30 mg LD
75 mg MD 10/5 mg MD* Clopidogrel Prasugrel
75 mg MD 10/5 mg MD*
* 5 mg MD of prasugrel for age 75 yrs or weight < 60 kg
HR (95% CI):
Endpoint (%)
HR (95% CI):
1.31 (0.81, 2.11)
P = 0.27