Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MAGISTRATE AT BANGALORE.
P.C.R.No_______________/2011
C.C. No._______________/2011
V/s
VERIFICATION
I, Manmohan Singh Gadhok, the above named complainant,
do hereby declare that what is stated above is true to the best of my
knowledge, belief and information.
Bangalore,
Date: Complainant
List of Documents
WITNESSES
1. The Complainant
2. Branch Manager,
Honk Kong and Shanghai Bank
Corporation Bank, MG road Branch,
Bangalore
3. Branch Manager,
ICICI Bank,
Bandra West Branch.
Mumbai
V/s
4. I submits the notice sent to the Accused through RPAD was duly
served on 21.01.2011. The accused has failed to make payment
within 15 days from the receipt of the said notice. After service of
the notice the accused neither paid any amount towards the
cheques and nor replied.
Identified by me
Deponent
Advocate
Bangalore
Date:30.04.2011
7. The Complainant submits that the accused no.1 and 2 are the partners of M/s Amulya Projects. The
accused no.1 and 2 have purchased the property from the complainant company and got the sale deed
registered in favour of M/s Amulya Projects on 16.09.06. The accused no.1 and 2 have issued two
cheques towards two sale deeds for a sum of Rs.50,00,000/- each. bearing No.083453, dated on
30.10.2006 and cheque bearing no.083454, drawn on UTI BANK LTD, Jayanagara IV Block,
No.55/5, 30th Cross, 13th Main, Bangalore-11, drawn in favour of complainant towards the
consideration of the said sale deeds you have issued the said cheques promising complainant that
accused are having sufficient balance at their account and on presentation the said cheques will be
honoured.
8. The complainant submits that complainant herein has presented the cheque for encashment through his
banker UNION BANK OF INDIA, Koramangala, Bangalore, as per your instruction on 22.04.07. The
said cheques were returned dishonoured with the shara “FUNDS INSUFFICIENT” on 23.04.07. The
complaint got issued the legal notice to the accused hereon on 11.05.2007 calling upon the accused
herein calling upon them to pay the amount towards the cheques within 15 days from the receipt of
the said notice. The notice send to the Accused No.1 and 2 was duly served on 15.05.2007. The
accused have failed to make payment within 15 days from the receipt of the said notice. The accused
have committed on
Contd.3
-3-
offence Under Section 138 of N.I. Act. They have issued the said cheques knowing fully aware that
the said cheques will be dishonoured their intention is to cheat the complainant herein. Hence the
accused have committed an offence punishable Under Section 138 of N.I. Act.
9. The complainant submits that the cheques were issued towards the sale transactions and the cheque
has been issued for the sale consideration and there is a debt liability on the part of the accused
persons. At the time of issuance of cheque the accused have promised that they have got sufficient
fund in their account and on presentation the cheques will be honoured. The accused persons have
deliberately failed to arrange the funds with an intention to cheat the complainant there by to cause
wrongful loss to the complainant and to have wrongful gain. They have committed an offence under
section 138 of N.I.Act and section 420 of I.P.C.
10. The complainant submits that the complainant has presented the cheques for encashment on
22.04.2007 and the same was returned with the shara INSUFFICEINT FUNDS on 23.04.07. The
company has got issued legal notice on 11.05.2007 the notice was served to the accused on
15.05.2007. The accused have failed to make the payment within 15 days. Hence the above complaint
is filed with in one month from the date of cause of action. Hence the above complaint is in time.