Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5 - Special Investigations PDF
5 - Special Investigations PDF
5. SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS
Special investigations relate to such items as deep cuts, embankments over soft and
compressible soils, expansive soils and natural slopes.
Regarding the investigations of deep cuts, it is desirable to conduct specific test pits,
borings, auger probes and/or geophysical investigations, since significant cost overruns
can result from erroneous estimates of rock excavation (as opposed to unclassified or
earth excavation).
The potential for water resurgence in deep cuts should also be investigated.
The stability of cut sections needs to be detailed, including provision of cut-off and
interface drainage, and treatment of other slope stability issues.
When new horizontal alignment is required, or when the vertical alignment is changed,
required new cuts should be designed and existing cuts deepened. It is very important to
avoid rocky cuts whenever possible. At the final design stage, visual inspection of these
areas is required.
If additional, possibly expensive, tests are deemed necessary, such as seismic tests or
drilling, a program should be proposed to ERA for approval, describing the scope, intent,
and price of the tests.
Specific drainage systems must also be designed to protect slopes prone to mud slides
from rainfall runoff.
The depth and degree of weathering may be very variable within short distances.
Laterization may also be present. The determination of the rock level is important not
only to estimate quantities and costs, but also because its interface with the overlying soil
may provide an opportunity for the presence of a perched water table. Springs may also
be a problem, depending on the type of rock and its structure.
The water table may be permanent, seasonal or perched. In any event, its presence and
characteristics (level, flow, etc.) should be determined, as they influence the stability and
any drainage system which may be required.
Also, the likelihood of springs occurring within the cut should be assessed.
The complete analytical determination of the stability of a cut section is complex and
beyond the scope of this investigation manual. However, it is worth giving approximate
“rules of thumb”, or guidelines, given by experience, as listed below. It is essential to
remember that these guidelines do not take into account the presence of water or of
external loads. They are also limited to cases of homogeneous masses, and, in the case of
rock, do not account for strong patterns of jointing and their orientation.
Erosion control may occasionally conflict with stability requirements. One reason in
cohesive soils is that erosion is less pronounced for steep slopes than for 1 (V): 1 (H)
slopes, as exposure to rainfall decreases. The 1 (V): 1 (H) slopes may be considered for
cuts over 4 to 5 meters depth if planted with grass, otherwise 1.5 (V): 1 (H) slopes may
be more suitable in combination with berms at 4 meters vertical intervals.
Inspection of existing cut slopes is necessary to benefit from local experience.
(classification) tests among which moisture content and organic content determination
will be more extensive than usual, tests will include consolidation tests, unconfined
compression tests, and triaxial tests. The design parameters for stability analysis and
settlement analysis can be derived from these tests.
Failure in bearing also requires consideration in these embankments. Embankments,
when built on weak foundation materials, may be subjected to sinking and spreading
failures, irrespective of the stability of the new overlying embankment material. A simple
rule of thumb based on bearing capacity theory can be used to make a preliminary
estimate of the factor of safety against circular arc failure for an embankment built over a
clay foundation. The rule is (Cheney and Chassie, 1982, Ref. 9):
6c
F.S. =
γ fill × Hfill
where F.S. = factor of safety
c = cohesion of foundation clay
γfill = unit weight of embankment fill
Hfill = height of embankment fill
The factor of safety computed using this rule serves only as a rough preliminary estimate
of the stability of an embankment over a clay foundation and should not be used for final
design. If the factor of safety using this rule is less than 2.5, a more comprehensive
stability analysis is required.
Possible foundation treatment methods for constructing embankments on soft and
compressible soils include:
• Partial excavation
• Preloading with surcharge fills
• Preloading with vertical drains
• Pile-supported embankments
Detailed analysis of these methods is beyond the scope of this manual.
5.3 Natural Slopes
Many projects intersect ridges and valleys, and these landscape features can be prone to
slope stability problems. Natural slopes that have been stable for many years may
suddenly fail because of changes in topography, seismicity, groundwater flows, loss of
strength, stress changes and weathering. Careful and long-term study of a critical slope
along the proposed alignment is required to understand and predict the slope’s behavior.
Progressive failures of natural slopes are most likely due to materials such as clays and
shale. The presence of such materials and their properties should be investigated in slope
studies.
(i) Forms of falls in rock masses: (a) free fall and (b) toppling by overturning (ii) Slide forms in
soil formations. (a) Single block failed along slope as a result of high groundwater level, or
strength increase with depth in cohesive soils. (b) Single block in homogeneous cohesive soils
failed below toe of slope because of either a stronger or weaker soil boundary at base. (c) Failure
of multiple blocks along the contact with strong material. (d) Planar slide or slump in thin soil
layer over rock. Often called debris slides. Common in colluvium and develop readily into flows.
(e) Failure by lateral spreading.
Detailed analysis of these methods is beyond the scope of this manual. Depending on the
site conditions, an appropriate method of remediation needs to be adopted.
5.4.1 GENERAL
Expansive soils are those that exhibit particularly large volumetric changes (shrinkage
and swell) following variations in their in-service moisture contents.
Expansive soils, which usually contain the clay mineral montmorillonite, include
sedimentary and residual soils, claystones and shales. Relatively large areas are covered
with expansive soils such as black cotton soils and red silt clays. These clays have caused
persistent difficulties in road construction and are a relatively common problem in
Ethiopia. The following paragraphs give an outline of the problems associated with these
soils, in order for the personnel in charge of the investigations to be aware of their nature.
5.4.2 IDENTIFICATION
Routine investigations are those analyses carried out during normal centerline soils
surveys and site observations, including simple geological and geomorphological
assessments, field reconnaissance, routine indicator tests of Atterburg limits and grading.
Table 5-3 shows information usually collected during a field reconnaissance, with typical
features of expansive soils given in the second column:
Where
wp = PI x (% passing 425mm)/100
ws = Shrinkage Limit x (% passing 425µm)/100
In-depth studies are carried out where extended investigations have revealed the
occurrence of expansive soils and the required countermeasures are costly. Treatment of
expansive soils has far-reaching economic consequences on major road projects
traversing long sections of expansive soils. Such projects may warrant in-depth studies of
the expansiveness of the soil, including determination of clay minerology. In-depth
studies to quantify swell potential include:
• Oedometer compression test with unloading and consolidation stages
• Determination of swell index from unloading stages
• Calculation of expansiveness from formula relating to swell index below
• Instrumental anaylsis to identify characteristic clay minerology, e.g. X-ray
diffraction, differential thermal analysis, and electron microscopy
The system for relative classification of expansive soils is given in terms of Єex in Table
5-4:
• Volume changes: expansive soils shrink and crack when they dry out and swell when
they get wet. The cracks allow water to penetrate deep into the soil, hence causing
considerable expansion. This results in deformation of the road surface, since the
expansion and the subsequent heave are never uniform. Furthermore, these volume
changes may produce lateral displacements (“creep”) of the expansive clay, if the
side slopes are not gentle enough. Seasonal wetting causes the road edges to wet and
dry at a different rate than those under the surfacing. This mechanism in turn causes
differential movements over the cross section of the road and associated crack
developments, first occurring in the shoulder area, and subsequently developing in
the carriageway, as indicated in Figure 5-2.
• Bearing capacity: when the moisture content increases, expansion occurs and the
bearing strength of the expansive soil decreases dramatically. The CBR may be
reduced to less than 2 if the soil becomes completely saturated.
• Susceptibility to erosion: when they are or become dry, expansive soils may present a
sand like texture. In this state, they are prone to erosion to a much greater extent than
that normally anticipated from their plasticity and clay content.
Some design and construction considerations specific to expansive soils are mentioned in
the following paragraphs, to the extent that they may influence the scope of the
investigations undertaken in the field and the laboratory.
The measures chosen to minimize or eliminate the effect of expansive soils shall be
economically realistic and proportionate to the risks of potential pavement damage and
increased maintenance costs.
The design engineer may consider the following four main approaches to mitigate or
overcome the problem of expansive clays:
• Avoid expansive clays areas by realignment
• Excavate the expansive clays and replace them with suitable material (backfilling)
• Treat the expansive clays (with lime)
• Minimize moisture changes and potential swelling in the expansive clays.
(a) Realignment: this solution is possible only if the areas covered with expansive clays
are of limited extent. It is still possible to consider at this stage of design.
(b) Excavation and replacement: this simple procedure effectively eliminates the
problems and is therefore recommended as much as possible. However, backfill materials
are to be obtained from borrow pits, thereby increasing the need for such investigations.
The investigations should focus on minimizing haulage of the materials, and this method
will be economically viable only if suitable backfill material is available in the vicinity of
the road.
It is usually considered sufficient to excavate the expansive soil to a depth of about 1 m
(even if some expansive soil remains under the backfill material, it will be confined and
protected from moisture changes). This may consequently be used for preliminary
estimates of the required quantity of backfill material. Such backfill material should
exhibit strength (CBR) characteristics similar to those of the overlying embankment
materials (preferably at least CBR on the order of 5, i.e. subgrade strength class S3) and
should not be too pervious in order not to act as a drain.
(c) Treatment with lime: Treatment of expansive soils with hydrated lime can give good
results. The addition of 4 to 6% of lime is usually required and provides the following
improvements:
- Reduction of the plasticity index to less than 20
- Considerable increase of the shrinkage limit
- Reduction of the swell to negligible values
- Increase of the CBR to a minimum of 10 (after 7 days cure) and 15 (after 28 days
cure), with corresponding improvement of the subgrade strength class.
- Modification of the particle size distribution (by agglomeration of the clay particles),
the final grading being similar to that of a silt.
If the above methods cannot be utilized, because of excessive costs or the absence of
suitable fill or replacement material, expansive clays may be used for fill and subgrade.
Special practices are then necessary to avoid detrimental moisture and volume changes in
the swelling soils, as follows:
These unwanted effects can be avoided by placing a slippage layer, consisting of a thick
polythene sheet, and a thin layer of sand, at the interface between subgrade and
pavement. They inhibit the upward travel of the cracks. Alternatively, not using or
modifying these materials can reduce the problems.
It is essential that the swelling soils under the pavement are protected from moisture
changes, whether caused by external water or by internal variations. To this end, the
following practices should be adopted:
2. The shoulders must be sealed. They should be extended to a width at least equal to the
depth of the zone affected by seasonal moisture changes. Their width should in no case
be less than 2 m.
3. The side ditches should be dispensed with, or if this is impractical, they should be
located as far away as feasible from the pavement. They should have sufficient section
and grade to ensure that no water ponding can occur.
• Pavement selection
Since small differential movements of the subgrade are almost inevitable, even if
mitigation measures are implemented, flexible pavements are required. Double surface
treatment is generally adequate if the pavement layers are impervious. Asphalt concrete
is preferred over pervious roadbase and subbase layers.
• Embankments slopes
If the side slopes of the embankments are protected by non-swelling materials, usual
slopes (e.g. 1(V):2(H)) may be used. However, if left unprotected, expansive soils are
prone to erosion and also to creep due to lateral expansion movements. Safe slopes in
expansive soils are therefore very gentle. If expansive soils are to be left exposed, as may
be the case in shallow cuts or side ditches, it is recommended that the slope does not
exceed 1 (Vertical) : 4 (Horizontal).
• Drainage structures
Culverts must not be cast and drainage pipes not be laid directly against expansive clays.
Surrounds or haunches, made from non-swelling material, must be placed. The use of
impermeable and, if possible, gravelly material is essential.
Current Consequences
The site investigation capacity available at present in Ethiopia is limited, and the
recommendations to drill and sample deep cuts, rock quarries, and two holes at each
bridge abutment and pier, have a number of consequences:
• Design Consultants will be put at greater risk due to having to let sub-contracts to
variable performers.
In the present system, the Design Consultant obtains surface samples from rock quarries
and investigates bridge sites by a combination of trail pits, probe holes and geosysmic
and resistivity survey, and then provides a full site investigation rig for the Supervision
Engineer’s use in the Construction Contract. It is suggested that this system is more
economic and better suited to Ethiopia at present, where constraints of access inhibit site
investigation contractors working in isolation.
One drill hole per abutment and pier, three to four holes per rock quarry, and one to two
holes per major deep cut should be sufficient and this program will take approximately
three months to carry out per 100km of average road.