This document discusses the treatment of a 19-year-old male cleft patient using distraction osteogenesis of the maxilla (LeFort I surgery) and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) of the mandible. Due to previous cleft surgery, the patient had scar tissue formation that led to a hypoplastic maxilla and class III malocclusion. Maxillary distraction was first used to advance the maxilla, followed by LeFort I and BSSO surgery to further correct the class III deformity. The expected results were achieved, with the patient now in the finishing stage of orthodontic treatment.
Original Description:
Original Title
CLEFT WITH DISTRACTION OSTEOGENESIS AND LEFORT WITH BSSO
This document discusses the treatment of a 19-year-old male cleft patient using distraction osteogenesis of the maxilla (LeFort I surgery) and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) of the mandible. Due to previous cleft surgery, the patient had scar tissue formation that led to a hypoplastic maxilla and class III malocclusion. Maxillary distraction was first used to advance the maxilla, followed by LeFort I and BSSO surgery to further correct the class III deformity. The expected results were achieved, with the patient now in the finishing stage of orthodontic treatment.
This document discusses the treatment of a 19-year-old male cleft patient using distraction osteogenesis of the maxilla (LeFort I surgery) and bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) of the mandible. Due to previous cleft surgery, the patient had scar tissue formation that led to a hypoplastic maxilla and class III malocclusion. Maxillary distraction was first used to advance the maxilla, followed by LeFort I and BSSO surgery to further correct the class III deformity. The expected results were achieved, with the patient now in the finishing stage of orthodontic treatment.
In cleft patients due to multiple surgical interventions there is scar tissue
formation which impedes maxillary growth resulting in a hypoplastic maxilla leading to a class III appearance with a concave profile. Hence various surgical protocols like distraction osteogenesis and bi jaw surgeries are advocated in bringing out positive results for a better profile and smile. This paper discusses a case of 19 year old male patient who was reported to department of orthodontics with a chief complaint of backwardly placed upper jaw and difficulty in mastication and speech. On Extra oral examination patient had a unilateral cleft which was treated , deficient malar eminence, concave profile and gross facial asymmetry. On Intra oral examination it was noticed that patient had Angle’s class III Molar relationship with severe negative overjet, constricted arch, midline shift , crowding and posterior crossbite . Cephalometric values showed a class 3 skeletal base with vertical growth pattern. Initially case was bonded and quad helix was placed for expansion once the expansion was achieved , maxillary distractor was used to bring the maxilla forward. After distraction osteogenesis was performed a second surgery was planned and performed which included LEFORT 1 with BSSO. Hence Maxilla was brought forward and Mandible was set back . All the expected results were achieved. Currently patient is in finishing and detailing stage.