=e i onsen ‘laced inj by the thors in enter to be sora net IP compat Ie Hod wid he MTC, the same. oa Procedure dor Rule 12, Seaton 3a) shal be Sosened Ievations ae areal nc are usualy et ‘Bensttitonat bt in same sacar may be taken Ht te Complaint oF Information i ed wih thes commands (Baba x. NOL GN. L209 ere Sopnomoor 28 1084) However, the proton of {Steer hie so mist 0 flowed, issung. en “vat” tea parson hoe 2-Tre ude shall pesoraly ovate ito eience, _vorbgtod in conection wih an flnso he fe (personaly exami ning and unde cath, ‘Sispoted to have corvniled I coneeres az ee an ‘ ‘earning uations. a The je ann te ng oft I coubt. he uaa ‘dona! ovens ‘The julge may eu ot rest huge neceesty fo tong ho Condition that must ook Rove sg ARREST ‘SECTION :, DEFINITION OF ARREST — Investpatn ( ‘Thenkng ota porsoninto conto in ocer hate ‘84508 November 4 168) ‘may ba bound w anewer or he commision f an 3.The warm me paints desc he cen ‘itecee (RULES OF COURT, Rue 113, Sac 1). A robetion wt specifies arin. en or wort improper ene (et saron ofan oe egy issu, in poet ome poten @ ge nt 8 ‘Sw. 0eoA Couusaeor Law 374 Doss chetmaiturd BaxOrcumonsCRIMINAL PROCEDURE, scaminon of to ocovsed (ins v. Cour of SECTION 4. EXECUTION OF WARRANT ‘peas, GF. No L270, sy 2 108). The Wege iues a arnt Of eel two + Reece” te: es {Upon the Ming of the ltormation by the ‘geting og ane (te 74 Seoton 25) prosecutor =n sung thi kd of wars [igo does el personaly” eramne the ‘SECTION. ARREST: HOW MADE {mnie and the Waezee he may produc, bite marty evaluies personaly the rport ere ‘ipparing Socumoris another evience ‘added dung the prlminary lvestigaton nd ted to in by tha prosecutor, and i he erart of Brrst: Unto & seach 2 vata ol winch led to tor (10) ‘her went Decors ad Pale, 128 220 rr dB aly of {o ky a warranoss ancl andr Section ‘re rouem menses in te secon rere not © the phyla delivery te very same copy of he Pocoss tothe boung coun bat erp of the Sor charmed wih ke expeton on tho. seen {akon by hin thon, n str. etna periods ‘ciya evive to tw er Snaening te waa io'make a tu 1 tne cout (Pooper SECTION. DUTY OF ARRESTING OFFICER (GAINo. 182188, January 8 2001). ‘Aahy saued waa mahotaon the proper eset SECTION 5. ARREST. WITHOUT WARRANT: Wen TAWeUL General Rule: No peace fear of parscn has tho ‘ower er anor to anest"syone. wid Sore ae ar cers ey aed ‘ytaw (Ut ames, GA No BYGe?, ‘on Sn Bina Cours oF Law 2015 comaimpbaxOvennons. 375 ulExceptions: Lavi warandes arest 3, Evasion of te aerice of sentence “Vin tagrante alco arate ‘When te peor to bo eesti a pian wo ‘ine, me prasece, he person 0 be arosod «han eacaped tom a peel ssabsceret ovo tas ‘commited, Is actualy commiting, or ts where he's soning fn hugo or temporary ‘tenging comm anon ‘confined whe Ne aeo ponding. er has ‘escaped while ‘bong Uanetered om One (rtagrante delet Areas ‘Sonfnemant oan notes commttsain he presence or wha {tee othe prcn aking aret when he The ame founded onthe princi het a he Sic ofonce,athough stadistanca, orhears the ef tho aoa. tho escent ‘Ne etianceecrentod nereby ena puns ato chee fhe soano, oreo oF a uy bust Operalons ‘ess has JUST been commits. Tho time farm ef enapmant which has been repeatedly ‘era bétwoon the actual ‘Scceped to 6 a vald Moats aneting aor Ta fihe ses offlest st of tn Cangorous Drag awh te cnt Note: Coordination wth the POEA is nc an ‘eat of messy: there must bea ae Inasponsatle roqurament toe pols autres ray cary out 8 buy-bus operon (Poop ‘bein, GA. No" 17908, Ao 2012) ‘Sin Bena Couscsor Law 376 Zo15 CacanuzeD BAe OPERATIONSIn by tust operation, these to corm a cr ngs. tom te ‘nth anyoody Saenger Teint the forse {egal saleqiocs, a boy-bust operation deseves |Mcal sanclon” (Peon w. Aguby, GAL No. "81747, Sopombe 28,2008) “The bupbus operation and te soar and wszice ‘pram to the buy burt_eperaton mu Se ae apa 18 ote nineotneaseh 1Otecton to ha Section, WETHOD OF Annest oF OFFICER Sy anrud of WARRANT Bury the areating occr The oes shat or te prton tobe aresie’ ders nde an sre may bm maga evn flies oor ssl poteaton ofthe waa of ‘Stent (Maat vs CA| GA No. 110569, December ‘CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 9, 1988). ton ofa warrant pir ote ret {ot nocensary. Howovar fata to ast te + Porson areca’ 30 rege, he warart sal be Shown hi as soon a praciabl ‘SECTION 8, METHOD OF ARREST BY OFFICER vwirwour WARRANT Duty of arresting officer witout warant: ‘ho fica hal frm fe person be eteted *) arsenw bo sested ig anganed ‘nO dabgin tt Note:The pte person mus dvr toast’ ‘orconto the reatet plc ttn oj, nd he hale procened againsin sceardance wi Fue ‘Wa, Se. Obes, to pate person may be ‘SECTION 10. OFFICER MAY sULMON Assistance SECTION 11. RIGHT OF OFFICER TO BREAK INTO BUNLDING OR ENCLOSURE ‘SECTION 12, RIGHT TO BREAK OUT OF THE saena couse or aw roiscomainssoixcreanons 377PINE LTTE TT rf eae CRIMINAL PROCEDURE BUILDING OR ENCLOSURE TO EFFECT —srestod, delsinod or under cio ventgaon, RELEASE ‘to ero fo vunaone sec. Fs! te reting ote: : To wun site (Secon 1) *" ABR oaIVRrio ox many prone ae Rue ag ‘deems necessary to acest him meecing he Bar. nate at Srests nthe pet Note: Those rts aro ot angi 4 {Tbe pupese'at “Where 2 sorson tantly erated Js Bhie avaliable any #9 pornone in estoy of wale ae tho tau. Apenan win th cto) of aw nh he en & os "te MYR one ee nat a Pisce win to county. The Bueut most Be = "Tie oper sahereee (orp v Hote: The fugtve may be retaken by any parson ‘Baldaas AM No. 2.888, gut 1989), ‘howe sialody ne ascaped cr was escuod:Gven Reson: The pups ct-bal fst secu ond's veto person may. who a amas, sed two vices ors Is bond he soca & mat 29, ‘acon, Raw ‘On bale that 4 aouragen te prevents ! "esi the fon (Salonga v. Holand GA. No L- feat oho formes parisace paces whore the 1258, Merch 28, 1980) ‘cextad gout ust sone anther 'n he stoxd to Dost Ns Os, witout recxgrang the jaan Secon nau oF arronuey on a cout by he sano genus ein ae RELATIVE TO Vist PERSON ARRESTED farepance wih te reauromenis FA ase" det “conan ‘Agi ot peors (Falla. Past Gi Ne 1487, a 1, ‘su Benacousccor tw 378035 Creauzeo BAR Orexnons= roses gue rors eeuee Tena pct othe «Sate ei rere = Ce rrmNTe I sora ssi) 4 tes Ee et ‘A potent! exvadtee may be wibjectd oes, 8 ‘prongs resale of toon and frend 10 lon" may be a pecessary stp la ‘he process af tion, bu ta eng of tne of eae ee Eee Deetaton shout be reosmnase. The spe of Be 5 ee ise vue bear the Jurado of the cou shoving Dem ox sho is ot 2 Heh oak be aris ba nin 6 ober rambers ot y 1 commited ts upheld the ‘Sasod flee 8 motion FEV oman sahie ae wet 2e rae the Pyke person under etme Sipe ol Ths rie cases [re sr pou ot also be allowed 8 peso, wel eee s roi ee ao a es pike Sion nae otha cous posed Oe et Se ft Smonaton Pipe a_i pho. all In Exadlon Proce: Sas ‘See SaiBenacourecortaw’ 555 zoiscommausioBanovenarons 3Persons undor Custody of tay Cours we petenitedin Reasons 1 Ung sete of th may 2.0anger to socuny ax Wey Bre slowed by the goverment teil Une efron: fe 8 Dangerous as the accusedatcer sion bal ‘ay use tha rity ifoonoe To the flow orados inert 13 cvertwow the govern (Comendator "De Vite GA No. ‘agus 2 1809). Forms of dats 4 Eaaste may oly eevee opto. 2. he ou alas ta. uote i Too ‘Recuting Araignmant Before Gro of Bal ot. alld: i's 2 mistaan theory forthe cout Rt ‘eae araignment beter tha grant of bal where [Sautonznd The tease ‘The ta our eouls ensue the pesancs ofthe SavBeoa couse or aw 380. Zots Covrnalz Bak Ornarons J COLLEGE @' SECTION 2. CONDTIONS OF THE BAL; REQUIREMENTS. +The undeating sha be efeive upon sppova, {nd ures cance, shal roman ee ata Sages of the case’ unl promulgate of Iigment ofthe TG, especie of whether 200 wes egal fla nor appeces tik 2.Tha_ acousod shal appoar Belov tho proper EARS wherever wo rege by he cout of ess goa Bi see oe ont ‘seilebticaps from piso of ‘or fece 80 feat th bondsan meat eco he tho 18° day from, promulgsin ot sce of setenes ote: The tal court may impose tne corions ‘1 gfanting bat where th ation’ ot he cared lumping Bator of arming "er are te ‘Gites Years image Vie, Gt No. ‘reas, August 8 1979) Homes, tha cout may not engose editors bigatons upon the Bondsman cfr than those rovied for by lam. Tho cbigaton imposes upon {he bondemen cannot be greater nero a deren ‘Garetar than tose iiowed upon tho eased (Gareey dodge of Court of Fret Instance GA ‘yng fake bal od, an appar ede 0 he "escaped tom ‘confnamnen arte tne ‘ender ois spp ahd nth nal couse otBe Bee CRIMINAL PROCEDURE agg things His apa! shouldbe semisnd besos on ‘Sects Rule f24 (People Dal Rosana, GF. NO. ‘o7e8-8@, December 19,2000 Iota: The conion of th bol that "he acu Shall appesr beloe te proper cout whenever sO osu byte cout or tena nls” operates at 8 {ie excaon on fe igh to Uael fanotoe S GAGA We 6940, May 30 1288. SECTION 3, NO RELEASE OR TRANS EXGEPT ON COURT OROER OA No person nor deetion by 1g be losses or ranalaos eran itor hen he aaa ba Amatter of rights 4 Batre conmenonty te 2A enon by he ve roto oan lst Tasca ts Toes Seite reasons Sens pcs recoariat Notice ot Hearing Requted: Wor bl a Iaterctgn oro cee, rosonate ea ot ROSS? Sian no” aust oe aes m ary thea TBE fb eq oa Ps Seon + ‘ton oacr susn ane ape chart Teton isu ar ones or waar ais fuptv for: jstes (Chin v: Gus, AML Ne fToo8 120, August 17,1995) “Wooing is ot equ if bal recommended by Droveaslon and tis mat of gh "ePagaytan, AM. No. ATS-03-1751, Shine 102003) “Tne Accused Who Absconded ater posting doce not love hio Right to Bait When an 2 1 seus ta 10 trent Bo granted pe 0acambe 41987. ions ott winou vat uenton cderian a fants on reba, ‘ori or under ovate pds éGreumstance of the sutuses or Ne case Tdostos the pote of age released on bal ‘rive ek of commision of anther ee by tho scised dong pendency of ope. Ihmaybe infra om Se. Sint ba accused ic ‘coe by tho RIG of cme wih sonal of ‘et more than (@) years impaonmant bal ‘hl amar! deweton, However tho buonas San toa corceoe Law 201s contmuzeoeanorcnrions: 384A | = the sbowecied crcumetanoe under Sacton 5 i ‘ot ane requ’ In tder for te. Sut to ‘ec whetor soto grat ba Note: in order fo grant ba a6 a mater of ‘dena, i eto the accused shouts appedl the soncton sf th RI tothe appetite ct ‘Upon canviton ofthe RTC, the bal poste erie: 5 a mats of rt loses ts fre and ‘rst ies new ane separate pot ‘rer conce by ta ‘ronson Bena Sitar ccnatnca to ba nal ie gant (Sond edtegnents Bat anc ‘SECTION 6. CAPITAL OFFENSE, DEFINED [eters ost once whieh, tet le 2: ho tine tte conmasion sr he tne th [epeaton be acted to bat, may bo punished ‘wh doth il te ot com ne ot Impose "tho daath"ponaly. the sobeoguat noninent’ of to. law ness the ponaty ‘anol apy tho cae, othenae woud ‘ost acto, ad pales af determinad by tha oe ‘tte tine ote commission of be ofense Seo, Courae oF Law 382. ZoLSCexrmaino Bak Orenanons CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Ip, Fzesapone ot lhe aw a te time of he application for ba has ‘anensed the rior law which rmpased the death * enlly by reducing such penalty, sich fovea few cena has a revoncve ec SECTION 7. CAPITAL OFFENSE NOT BAILABLE General Rule: Captal fone or hake punishable by recs porpeus, tte moron oF death ‘fe netbalabe when evdencec gui song. bo dong pot ha ware ecco iy nl cin be 3 lw cago bo sertenead 10 BM, No. 65220, Fett) 18, jenng the amount ba, ing ceeumetsncn of ios perce geet Hence, yout atenders ate et putin jal by poles authorize open lr ares rhe fone {tat in convcton they 0e not commited how mach more when oy ae not ed much Neos Investigates ‘The capital nature ofthe aens i determined by {he pent prosaibed by lw andra the panty ‘Schlalyimpored on the accumed Brana oh Bova, GF No. 68228, Fb 18 1089),__ ean SECTION @ BURDEN OF PROOF IN BAL. ‘Fate to aloge sur ‘wren ear a ba hater or nt a Is face stimmstatve ena ‘re Sie pms eg we ote Ss Som 5, Sten ana! aoe Be incr dea ais ng ae Serie 7 Saat A Becton ot i wa vec issefonary upon the judge. snd ts ostcane tetnot be “compelled by mandamun (Payee {esaes, GAL No. 45178, Jy 28,1935, {bt i denied by ral eau, he rvw retin 8 the Supreme Court may be Inve, tut ol ‘niout it “appiving tothe Ca (Poop Magatanes, GH Noa 9801914, Oot 1 188)" mt diet) BREDA AO OLLEGE OF 1 es SECTION 0, auouNT OF ‘Aeplcaton tr Bat. ‘Notte rococo raquo ‘hima ema ‘commendation ‘Condt Hearing ofthe "sppicaten orb Evidence of Gute Not 8.The fac hat th escinad was 3 fave fom ste wen srs an 10. ordanoy of ober cats wha te accused oneal, ut ste btn bane th pce for corsa, te dain © ch est ‘her ors redo ie probe of oe ‘Serene ofthe asain of oh tat a ee Blrishine. Kshects be hgh enough ts esas ‘ratonca of eter tt no higher ents Fessorsby called 1 Katte’ gupoes SwiBenacoueceor Law -zois CourmuvcosaxOretarions 383He (CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Ye (taser v Abana, GR Na 23509, September ean Bal must ol be na roti amount. Ecosse ‘al sat be rons, ‘SECTION 10. CORPORATE SURETY ‘ay domestic or foreign corporation fesrsad es 3 surety io accordance. wih I "and cant Sutra 1 act a8 euch, may grouse bat by 2 Sond seated jor by the ecousd. a SECTION 12. QUALIFICATIONS OF SURETIES 'pRoPenTY BOND. The iifiestine of surabes in propety bond alba fons: JNEach must bo 2 resent ownee of tales ‘etn he ‘2Mihere tare 5 ony one ray, is ral cette ‘rust be worh et lest the amauta te Undoing and Sif ter ato or mere sures, each may tty ‘SeBebA Cousce oF Law 38 3015 Covmal Ban Oremanons ban amount less than that expessed in the ndorakin bol the aggregate of the stint ‘lars must be equivalent ote whole acu ‘he bol demanded Inaleaces, ovary sty mut be wort the amount paca nis cwn undertaking over and above st dete, oblgatons and propertes exes em Prine residency eroqured of property ‘reason for hs al boncemen sng cule of the Prppnes, ‘react the pocesces tthe (9 No L-23506, beng und oa, ny fly ‘hereto by the sure upon a maton st : Wout render him tbr perry ‘SECTION 14. DEPOSIT OF CASH AS BA. ‘The socused or any person cag in habe may leptin cas ah to dere Soec" ora Feloaso of the accused without a nocd for 8 our order sus sum {apercoritcate of epost ond 2 wien uncerng towing cmplance ih ‘The money deposi stall bo condor os bai and apple to the payment of fe sn Sst TheCRIMINAL PROCEDURE towhoeve made the pest posible mation resorbed Tor the orenea charg, wit ‘preudeo. te te entation of tho a ot tho process on appes ‘s.Aule tia, Soe 84 Where the. ecased has apd for prebaton ‘boone ‘esated but ro ball wes ‘apatie of fing. one. Note: The wil cout may oot reject otarice ‘ocopiae surtes. and inal Mal He aoomad ‘itans hs proveional erty oly Ura a eash bon Etcasive bal shal not be reauted (Amada Via, G No. 81685, August 1975) oles 16 an obigaton of recon, entra, ‘efore some Goo oF OMS Uh onaon emia ‘ppoararce of th acces. er * Aer GF No L258 Geter 27,1950. Note: The reas’ of tlio Bicone earn SECTION 16. BAL WHEN NOT ul Sebct ba oundeoganiee UP i ed by"Po sat Fath ath sot soa her ob recom ota rompers each Palo 114, Soe 16 - A Iegtarces whorsin the accused may be relsased on, ecogane, witht puting Bal br ok y waa [paren secned et an chan 5 ell ‘ence wth a masta cranky, onal ot stor chal coma oferty fe reloseed ator tity (G0) aaye ot povenve ‘le 114, Sec. 16—Apwroan In cody fr apr eal ote prince penaly Prosatios tor "he. fens heros, wou soplcaton Songun iw oe ary frosting cheamatsnes ena 5 reseed on mavens al Fon ie own resopnsanoe, She acannon ot ‘conmuaty 3.PD. 808 In casa of a (Giaral Rule Nob lean, tia Spal tent ti | Aa Son te 8 ‘Sistody Yor» period equal | one oe tan te | Exception: Whey 2 waren sf aoa seed fo fore to apsear hon rome’ ty ‘Bout (S00 96 oF ine Pines So "Summary Proce, zorscommaendanonmanons 385Exceptions to Release In Recognizance under Rates ‘item he le caught commiting the ofenee i Tagan. than conte toh corneon ofthe ‘ete uns he contest aa opcaaod oe ithe tes found ioe roves escaped ‘rom legal contents video sorte ‘iam «ite nd have rev i ‘provisions of Sec, 2 hereof, ae sin b's tp ba mck solemn eepte ne ing o fog bate the a, anamtoa the ital oun (rl 114, Soe 5) 2. e scmed sarin a iad pay ober han atte fering, Bl mays bo wan Sy Semin wth any hetrcout ge vate wih any aivhanoer he grr of bat weet” ot Uheowton, or ha sessed tok obs locas cognzance, the appaton may ead Si he patadoe sean wae te St i fertin whtner entra or appa! (Aa sono ante z «oy pon tod ost yt charged in ‘au may apy fr al ah ay coun De rovnen ty or mercial ors al ‘ite tiiden ofthe ea cur cane the ‘esos changed anata eft ose th ‘omelette alaie tm spies or bal Sy ery toed wih ‘bd ced Oy the Sppelinrcoun ‘A Juige pring In one baz has no power to ‘so ston cource ot Law 3862015 Comune Bak Oras ‘gant bal to an aecused who ie beng tied Srttarteanch proted by anchor je wh ‘et absent or ueavaltl, tnd is act of ons ‘bm on bal constulse ignorance of law which suects ti to dacnary saneton (Barbero Dymis, At Ne MTs.07 168 ane 18, 2008, SECTION 18. NOTICE OF APPLICATION TO Prosecuroa The mle makes no dition wheter bait ‘ot ght or ct dcr. It istancas, of hearing voulred wo be gon {ratast he must be exe er ‘An accused released wot bat upon fg of the ‘compli or infomation may, tay susoguent ‘tage of th procoodngs and whenaver aon shoniog of gt openrs tobe court be equaBes itag>(_CRIMINAL PROCEDURE egy ‘ho ball 9 me amount fa, on eu there, orem to eed, ‘The gusnes proved for Ruse 114, Sac. 9 fting'the amount of bat ae a80 epee reducing or iereasing the bal prev fed SECTION 21, FORFEITURE OF BAL ‘men th appearance of te sited out on bal is speotealy fquted by the cat and he fled to {The provisional tory of te a ‘at tora shat be fvthed a 2 shal requ Be) ondoman 8 inca . Win iy (20) deren & Gea Setter ae _ duce the SR sgn epi secon pat ‘Court may mga neat sonuses has boon surendared Note: The. wity (0)-cay Dboncsman to emp wh ‘SECTION 22. CANCELLATION OF BALL tthe boncemen with ue hates {the presociaar, upon saranda ofthe ecu prot tie dah ‘2.pon acquit of sored, ‘.Upen Blmissal of te ase: ‘Brenton of dgmont of oven, ‘alt te cancesoe:(AADE) ‘gen Appteston Note: Tiss winout peje to ay ably onthe SECTION 23. ARREST OF ACCUSED OUT ON BAL Methods by which Suraties may relleve ‘themselves rom responses: {Res the. peal End dale him fo he proper ‘auporas: ey cuse Ne af be made by any Brits ot ob powon of ssa abe DG ‘se Gi ‘Hind Departure Wate Allow Departure ‘Oraore ‘Arold. dopa ‘nde may be insu only by the Gs sn ctimina coor wan et ace Itedcton "(80 Greawr No 3097 (hn 13, 1897. Ths the 04 promulptes 00% Creat No, 41 gavering the sane of HOO, Wats! ‘rm ane ow Depress[ Se Reson — pana ial bo Teal Cours, the. Regina! Teal Court 2Agaks!” me aen woes presence is 2 Aasinst the ‘aguted ‘rer as 3) maponient, deterdort respondent | Irespocive of Oo winess in 2 oor | anally, aor "case “pending | Gririnal” casen gate any exes Sear ” emia sgeney S.Against any ion ‘nat pragma, on fe equa ot the ead a8 Depart, ‘Fv Goverment | Ssrumentalis, or in {he merest of nao seu, pe salty {punts neath {OCU uta No, See a thtdtie i teavance, | She due otis lowce, Une sooner nes sonar terns (20, Crear | Ul sooner Nos S24) earetetee pal fertenable periodot hot more than days CRIMINAL PROCEDURE )® (Dad Gretar No 41, See. ‘the | validly | 1. When ato ot the HOO has | "perod of the Steady expe Soody varaty cd SaBeaA cousceor Law 388 2015 connec Bak OrenaTOnS 2When the seamed sect oF te HOO ts toon slowed Senate pene ing to pendency 0 the cae, ors olen cuits of he chrge or he eae neh the ‘Goverment or “any of ie agencies ot ‘naan oF a iateat OF eons secu puloSfey cr pute heath, maybe es Scaled apie ie scan teeny ingore’ by the. governm iho requested heinous of heated ROOM (OGY Creare 4, Soc eh Wen low Oepartie rear (ABOs) may Forexceptonal reson alow he person leave upan uomissen of te flowin "An fiat of puto, ean Sy udatatng ropa he DO} Fmedily Ubon vou °Saag CNA OCDE peggy eee Phair kare vawsclerancn ome 2:7 legato the wart eave arena or Sitar apermerae goverment otc octom 3 The ala a unseen ay Ine investgtng prosecute lining imetigtion of the charge aeiat SECTION 24, NO BAL AFTER FINAL UBGHENT; EXCEPTION Provided th the acswood reisce un ‘nterng is lea. Tne coset shal cbsawe the mater as ay oo ractesbe, bl nat ear han te str oe dot ce an Spporunty ta be {Gt monies wit tbo ory (esa Panam GP SECTION 25. coURT. sir Sevantes x The clr hal oxrise_ sneraian fers ih city for he pose ot Lieesesery ston. The ccc jo Areal ly rr En ‘n folly and minke te isn. bona a inna cone wn Wow oepctreinltons Oe oaineo othe uso of subaancad or radocanie ‘ra cies une Subhuman sndtins shel be eat with by ew (CONST. Ace I, Secton 192). SECTION 26. BAIL NOT A BAR TO BVECTIONS ON ILLEGAL APREST, Lack OF OR IRREGULAR prguivaRY lvesrigarion {0 application for or admiasios toi shal not berth accused trom challenging ‘the vay ths ant Sw BeoA Cource or aw 2oiscewimueebanOraamons 289Note: Abst eatainty of gil ot ernaned 1 Right to be Informed of the Nature and the oc ete SP eit cere Bat atm he Ree i Na ‘Sauteds oven propesiton of protests Moana of the accused ofthe charge: Sores tawe Pecre'ormays Ga,—erahanataming ha No t23bee, Osta 28 191) 2Roqutemadt of scent alegatons t compa } Reason: The sighost posstiny of an ianosert 9.2 “inal coawsld for an ofa to tae not Qua Shriekicneeamdaenaoes eters $i om 9 peci areae f Ramee, od no cn Sees Srsoy cee Pr ae aspen ay nt Sanita te earch ee t see 5 Si — f Saree ¥ which lacks certain tear na Spe ce Saori maar Se (Sens a a Sere (Reed Sete 2 i ; senna ee yaa i Bai th Soa ee Fett ea sn i Ets ° b Rhee i ern te ¢ She oe at ees Ta ee aes aes (. Beats meet mad pacer eter rar Sa mesa ee i as sae | Seta thy stone: & é ee : Scion bed Wm Th Ra rt Te See Boy om een a ei tt © Rintele sne o ke? Sa Sees Steere ie ee me SERS ag EET: eames ormyany someones f See tes Sted os Serco oe song Uther Alt aed ape Ts to wtb ciao re ean pase 00; ican Sau eae ta 2Falue io en posession of ahien propery cr Us Eon GA No LSbig mugual oy | Secu ‘to, na 3. Fafa account nds snd oe ule tor errata io tim secs & People Gi No 184875, Deco Ga) bt of sacelense, he person who imckes goefensa ie presumed uty tn the Saeed ‘overs a wit bo ha . ‘SAN BeOA Couteczor Law 3 2015 centaauzes Ban rceanonsI Right to be Present and Defend In person fad iby Counsel at every sage’ tthe Broceeding Gener! Rue: Prosenés of te scusod rng the minal action snot Yequkad and shel be Gases ‘oon sole daureton Exception: he prosarca of the ected le ‘mandatory ne oteng acer le 16 Se. 1) comin 53 hh cee i "ay be pronourzed inthe ‘ourel of a eprecartathe (Fa ‘No 1108s, Decerer 20, 1294) Mar 9, 1000) ser court curing te (ue 126, Seay ‘Coniston. A No 96 Pesaro war Since a 2 roi he oce be Linton to vonguoh wim Vili aonote site I's important sista Constiion authorizing te ta cet nae ol nto appre ah CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Bocas AN SE ee a Such waiver of raht of the accused done het imesn aelsse ct be aseusa fam he Sopa, under be bond te appear in cout whan oe Sri Ti Sete ray we ng ot iy oF ebgaen "the cout (Came People eal, GA No 78342 March is tee Requirements for Tal n Absent 1: The acoued hasbeen araigroas ONY? ona LAU 2Daring a -s h scuse who mut aasert "git counsel. The cout wt nk at sons ‘he accede hs Fgh lots of 2 Pemon under Custodial Inveatgnion "Pe esol imestgntin ie me qustonng bj ew camer! often of 3 siapea” nha! ft Sisoy oF chenwes cad oss Scion ha sgn wy. Wincuces ey ound‘ tte! fos pone invoatgaid i cmmeton wih a cea ipectadto hve ces Pe 7s SwvBeoa Couxceor Law 2035 commu Ban OrtingCRIMINAL PROCED! JURE Not: Roadie qssioning fa motor detanee puruartte 2 rauiee tate stp questioning ot fal urd cusogal tropa, nor conf Be onscord aformal arrest by wits of te nate fhe questing, ths expectaos of the nos fed the offea.” ard the length ot time. te Drcondire snd. ‘Sine te mote! hese Was only sected to modest questions wt i! tthe stone he tate sap he was nt ha ‘momeat placed under cust such that he shoul havo been epered of he Manda Aas) fee can westmest ‘otha chazctera athe unatonas fomatarest SS: ‘Thi ring cas ok ing thet there ca, siesta wt ermowat @ Soaaieake ke 909). the former Stee’ anes (ol Stas kt the some veut (uk: Cement {A Fight To be assated by Counao tal mos Wilver ot the right fo eeuneel must be mae ‘wiht aealtance of counsel (A, See a), Conan ‘Speake inte fsowing instances: 1 Sning ote writen costal opt: 2. Sang of te writen er od confesslon, Bequie or he vat of anoxia Confestion: Sana bein ting: © Signed by to person arosad, detained or hae caste nose. an EI must oe signed In be. Pesenco of hi uns or the fate’ boone, Upon aid weir, whic mst be igned i th proenoe of S510 Depa couse oF Law 392 215 covsalzeD Baa Oreumions Eh. ‘ry of he parents, elérbromers and ait, his Seis, the musical mayer te. mantel Ig, atet"senoe supensscr, or pst or Innblerof he gospel a chon by im, 3, Sioniog ofthe waver fo te provisions of Art TRC, Assisting counsel may be any lawyer, ee one ~ " entajodal conesson Ne. 128177, August 5, 2008) at RX pBeson under ivestigaon hse te cht to be fii a Cel ly fc The Wor ‘reforabi" ‘does not con the massage bhatt coice & excuse ao praca St ‘eely ‘conpatom ane. naapendert ateoys IRanling ho" cate, cterice, the tompo. of stl invesigaon wil be soley nth hands of ‘ap cowed by sibbomniynaating to. be ‘presented bya lawyer aha, fr one Yeeson ot ‘hater ft avalabis toprol he treet Pom Basha, GA. se Lana 2, Note: The ig o counsel and he ih oremalo slot o ‘po cosa even” aor 8 cena foriplanuincmaten hes "aleady oes Bed ‘gant the accused, 2s org seh inci(oa * Mein GI Ne 12508 Mach 22, Otended pry canna wae sentance of ‘995, counsel * Reason: The offended party can ony intervene ln Tiesiel ie surto sci coune eottio "the cae tay courts Whe Benes pak (ihe accused has 0 lgalcoursl of cheice canna aiid ‘pate, prnseven Sa sean fd estos to employ the serices of one is prsocuar an epters e ‘monday only at th na of arigenon Tue Tie See") ¥, Right to testy as nese In hie own beh The a able ght"A dana of he caterers Consequence of Denial Right te Gounset "oh fo arty In ns bana wou cone a ‘Accusoa was coved dis sunkable voaton oth conatuena ight he. etaned “te sencos sight to counsel (Sa6 Tean v. CA (Gi 95026, (Rule 118. Sec. t/a). See ee Be . To be allowed visttatiy ér coltofarides! with) examined as to Tornanwers te a ses cee ‘once a ets peice ty a ka gat Sn ec nla aga oe ree ae Consequence of Veaton rctsig oa 8 penalty of imprisonment Yeats bat not mare than 10. ae betruction, proven or pohibion of terete orontrenees cena Seon git tere shal utr tho pon Intonation yt ave tn ‘SwuBeoacousceortaw 2015 Cevranizen Ban Oresavions 393(ah, Sonet aetna ay ate. {rhe ground that he anewer tat ha Ge, oF io" edoncs he wil pas wad hae be tenceroy theta forte crime wih wen ‘a's charged. Gut he may onto anewee ary Giestontnsimnatng tm for on ofence inch ‘om tt forunicn has hate lwcminating Question ‘hace may soot Men penal Scope covered by the right ‘he coneutonal arty, tat 9, rrpates i ay ext con anata ised jo Erroueary telinonil "sane ‘Grotary tthe. propos ie fot: The okt spb Spl t produce 2 accent a ‘cpl to fume a spec ef hs Bal fal irinten nen a eee Sur ‘iconee agane! meat ‘Bara Febuary 1h, 1960) ‘nstaness not covered by the Inermiaton (Enyce 2Exmiraon of ap ane gonortea swale 3Exmifaion of © woman for eth culty vl (Var No 15875, Saplmber 7, 1920) 006 7" 4Urderguaviact ight for examinat of rosence of fuoresoont powder “dusted Sn ‘amec money wood tuyus (Poop. Tranen, GR No. 10982, Asgut 7, 1804) Furisheg of spocimon. of sgn in flat of domiment case fs coveted By fe ‘2h because wing snl purely a mocha at fort hvowes te oppeaton of liane snd ‘fonten (tran. Samson, GA No. 32025, September 28, 102), ‘Tho right does Include cases covered by Immunity statutes Suen: Tia fara forteure ‘of opaly Obianed Waa 2A 749 Boor nd Gra Caaes ‘an Beoa Cote o¢ aw 39% Zol5 CenmauztD Ban Orenanions Whore Avail: Not ony mil but as government proceedings, ch admintatve Frococcngs whee tare i'w! penal sencton han invoked: ter the sskng of # question and ‘Reason for protecting the right agsinet salt Inerimination™ ame azn on poet criminal abi for whl he may Popeye cma a su ess = elena "ew Tannct co prosoctod Foams tina sch nt cae ott foto ot ‘ocuspd In the Mattor ot ‘The mah to telly an Ne own bai subject to ous exammaton oe pesecuton snd “Xin Teatyng the at Tete © specie ‘uoston when tid inet hi fr care Sher rime compat ectrory ena tue Wine, romanaAPO eaggs( CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Dag testy, gan in anoter case oF procecting, just ‘of admiral, ioivng the same saties an Subject mati, the severse arly Ravn tha fineness can a Sece6 is the ated tation }———_}.__ lam may ve wot; en pry ts a ne Sppatuniy cross examine a wes ute! to oct of ota! of accused to testy: Sra hms of po neces fresher a General Rule: Stones should ot projdco the rau Nmetl of. he receesty fares the ih esos ‘Exception: Unteyrase ference fl ‘ Petpet aay cas, sare Surtees ne 2 fw tatoo Mao ww ab cevsnat ety. res erases: GENRES Taso node corel Right to Conront determin ‘he pes sansa | o Thissewaebiongie | ee ‘tay orn oa 1 Note An esigan wa. rh A ia . Soon wales hang ; fa» sa ana Sh bo ond. winoasos nto tated Tato 0 no sts Contontaton . person in cour: Tre aa of sting a witness * Steud to tat a ator ny i apbonhe tum Rae 21) has he wibwss, and tt 113) We eusod, ati mat Presanco of tho out hava PospaNetbh of extrony Puls 194, an tho priioge of crose-examnaten. , covey (Ro 2929, Sas. 12,12, E 110, GR. No. 152643, Van, De burpen: Th pry pupon ae 5 Fos, August 28, 2008) oporunty ef eroseexaminaon ana th Seconcary supose is io enable the Jule 12 Sy comin proceed, the deterant ‘seve he demeanoc of wanesses tha rh to have compukoy process te sare te ‘Stendance of wtnoster ard the proton ot The ight 1 coronation dos not aro, in Siduneain nis wena Ppeimirary fwesigaton. The ivestgeing ofcar Seng preiminry svesigan ey selena! Right to ave a sped, impart and pubic wines. Whe he pares ae stowed tbe i herve oh Frese tt nerng, ney sre roxt nero ia rors or eros axon They Mey. ewe, purpewer To ott fheson and io provert Submit to rvesigeting offer queatone which may Gay "by mpeg on to cous and on Bo be geked othe pty or wines concered (FBP Desseuton'an “otigaln To ‘ptood "wih peasy ‘eosonane y way ofan exception fo hs nde, ts proved Fact conalered to determine I righ to spec ‘Tatethor pany may ciao spr ots evaonca rast colar ed {hetestmony of © winess who docoared, out ot’ 5 Conaet of to part (Laman ve. Praia, Je: {fo county 2 cannot wit due ignce bofeundin "QC he paring Cumann ‘fe Pilppnes, unevalable x oharwse nade Ne 19, 2006 5 Sav Bena CouuscoF Law porscenteaze Bxaormrons 395i RTPA Bt EA TT ¥ ‘ BB ie CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 2 Length ofa aeay, 2here the penty prescribes by law dss not 5 Renton forth coy, ‘iced sx (8) rors mprsonmont ce 8 fe ot ‘Tha accused's seston or aon sazaron ofthe + _ Pwo bah ‘gt and ‘Thos astorzed by the Chit Jus ofthe 66 ‘sPrejdce to tho accused reauting tam the (Second ‘day(Coscobeta ve Sandgandayan, GA. No ‘918 y 1, 2079) “The ine its stb tho Speedy Til Act of 1608 4 not procd justice porponement ent ‘Note: There is no wton of tho right where the delays when 20" warrantad by. to” sfuaton ely pula to the accused (Sais v Age, (Domondon v. Sndiganbayan, GAN, YS6006, ‘Ne nin 276s, done 27.1979. Tinie er 29, 2003). maneuver, waned is rot (oop lari OP No B809 "a8 y ‘The Speedy ral Act of 1998 (RA. Duty of the court ster arrignment $n focused: "ine Cour hall ater a prea, onfrence conidr the oon {Phe bergen {3 Mork fo toricaton of avidence of partie: ‘Cites of objectors to admiesBly of eaencs 5 Such othor meter ae wil promote a fair tnd ‘expeclios tl (Scton 2. reel [oot hat the Judges have boon wn encod, ie nt for te triacs hal ey a ty a ny ae {ot ezand one hanced eighty (60) ye rors the puny (Pople vs Santee GA No 121658, rat yf ak eer ‘Bebe 1 201) Exeeptons: Right to appeal onal cass allowed by lan ‘Those governed by the: Rules on Summay and nthe mannerpresebed by aw Procode or ‘Thats a wavable Mh The TOM spol om 3 ‘Sin B04 outta o Uw 398 2015 cowrmuzen Bax OFexaTOnSa |AL PROCEDURE {gront of conviction surement a eer. ‘ign iis not a natural nese may be dno bye lpstare a ong a8 hearing conducted tcet th spetate jsacon ofthe Supreme our when Congress cannot move But hare 8 alakory gato! appa. dnl he amo i violiton of due prose itv ofthe Right to Appea: The Is parca tothe “si SECTION 1. ARRAIGNMENT AND PLEA; HOW taape Arraignment “Ta ema moe of molementng te constant {ah ofthe sessed tobe ioe’ th nakre hd cause ofthe secusaion agent he he | Sandigareayan, GA Box 7207698 Purposes of enaignment: “VTo apprise te accused of the possible lose of trem, eve of his Me, depending ot te nate lth tive mpute to hime or 21am hin why the praseitng am ofthe ‘Slate is mobizod agate en. (Boogie Tenead No. 171020, March 14, 2007; People vMontron, GAL No, 190708, Mare 6 2002)| 30 inform fe accused of the reason for his Ingeimert. te spofe charges hw i Gourd to Sw BeoA Cousot or Aw 2orscenmeauaio Ban Ontanons 397CRIMINAL PROCEDURE . 2.0ariosue of winass igh eos (2 teats ot dangor oe We of such wines, ‘the accused wil al know the onty of the Wressos ait fim wan thoy taxa the stan (Peeps. Palace, GR. NO T-13930 Way 25, 1060) hon araignment a made: ‘inon the accused not under preventive ‘etenton- Uniase# shoe paod = ewes oy fal sw Suprene. Coutt crosar the be el witht (3) aye 1s out to cova rom nn tet date of en te ayraged wut ay (A 7610 (Cis Abuse At), me encod wit tives (3) ay FR Ry wal . ‘wii tty (2) days fom he "ecreabyeCone ‘bin of ce les on arlgrment: i ton may cal [omoston curng ta (Rope vs Pagina, ‘To prossctan may clon tis ter winasees See and sows aris he ‘to mentored in te. comvlont or iarmaton Sin aamng ue, 00 presented the acined dung sragrmart Sheed presumed t have ‘eon valdy ‘Sia Depa Cousceor Law 2OLSCentmazD BAR OreeaTiOns(CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CB 5.1 ane may be consid ely ater thot prior sraignmen, te scuged cannot Irucke buble ‘Miranda y Fao, GR No 159768, March 31, 206), If an information amended in subetnce whch starges te nate of he ofense,aaigent ot {he amended nermatn iw mandston, excel ‘he amendment Is ely as fo form: few v8 lames, GF. No. 182577, August, 2040) eat General rule: Araignment must odade the soto tal or heer th Iease ‘Exception: Arai teh wpe mat ate. pronalion utd tel ie Saudade {ul eprint. 10 ‘2 Goaneel of tha accueer ‘Soot examine to wingsibs Ghia. C9008 sane 17 180) be oiner words, thre stig farting ine ‘hen Ne ontrs e cantonal plea of aty (People shat, GA No. 190025, ay 3) Boe ‘When i pea nde or antiuous (People ‘Stong. GA RL 38626 ay ta 1978) let of Guilty is steal Conession ‘Gonert Pula Iie lomontary tat pl of guy i = judi ‘oniesion ‘of gut os" warts ofS the ‘atl fas alaged inte ntomaton, inuang ‘he apuravsingekeurstancos aged (People Cononcader, GR No. CS6080, September 18, "800, ae racine aa ae Pea of uty is mitating W 8 machete ‘sesin tas ecloie Pat St eo) Marsha, GR. No 878 March 18,1947, 2. the acciged id not hy ended the ‘easing and coneequens of i fare, GFP. No 49087 May 1 1935, ilamaton Is fester to austin ese” charged (Poop. Me 1053, Novara, foe) oes rot cheige_ the Senses panty t appear “Stowte gue ties the coun ay) sion ae : ; nen ates bie tai Se ae SF gh Pct 5 Sec. 1). “e = soreeae acre are gous resumption that Accused wae Araigned Geral fle" In vaw of the rescngion of ‘eolarty ne pextormance of ofl dite fea ‘Sireiond tpn snodt nn as ‘reigned In the abeence of snjing ‘ate crsy (ashe Gita EAA esas, Faonary 20,10) Exception: When the oflense chaiges ie bunhoble by deat (oops Aicango, GF No "17487, Decombar 13,198) Stal Beoi Courer or Law 2oIscommztosasOmnarions 399CRIMINAL PROCEDURE agg A Note: mere wrton manostaton isnot vats ‘ea (Cabo vs. 'Saraganbeyan, GI. Ne. 163500 Sine 6, 2008, ‘SECTION 2: PLEA OF GUILTY TO A LESSER ‘OFFENSE Pos barguning (in crime cases) Ib process were the accused and te prosecution work ot ‘Aer silent but before ial he secede {ube owes to pon guty to te ces ‘her winaroing heel nt pty om loa Sout toa nsarchaan oo Snort of ‘onal Weston receemy (ae 78, 3 However, Supreme Cut hel that los of {uly ols ofenee may ba conallrea dug {he tl propor and even afr fhe prosoron at Fresh posontng is evden and rete t case ‘Thus; the Gout hos eld Wat ft ater at lea barat was net race ding tho pal age or ttt was made ony aftr he prosoaton Soasy plosonted ‘overs! waneses (Baan “GASNos 1397277, Merch 2 2008. Si Bana Couzctor Law 400 2015 CovTanizeD BAROFERATIONS 3 provont ovisance rim to sah Soiree. Thdans more than mara noring the accused {hat he faces alton but sc forming fim ‘2c lng of Fp’ uno tel he ofan tht heal save tine atthe noon ‘penentary or 3 penal ely ‘The joie must seo to atthe accused s not Aint te fale imprason at ples of guy ‘aroe! witha enint veo” or & Shr eaten because hie admission shows romorse one part SECTION 4. PLEA OF GULTY To Now: caprral “orrense:’ ‘Recernon “oF EVIDENCE, DISCRETIONARY Consequences of Pea of Gul: As 3 re, 8 plea of gully conte an ureniedaceiasinCRIMINAL PROCEDURE aaa of ho cle ond of the stent ckcumsiances Sleged in to hiormaton and may tus be the foster 3 opment wnat ne nocd of evens Bore the sare. However, the cout may. upon Frater, alow he presentation of erence © prove ricgtng creumstances. ETS Cen seenteer ess SECTION 5, WHOA reer cute Pes of Guy ‘An ineordons Etec of improvident Pies: ‘en to an improviser pea of guilty, does ‘ot mean hat th case hous borer he, ‘tal our. Ths cour of acon fe appropri only wer te apolar lon of gat we sla subsite by a pla of ret gully (ue 16, Se. a “Tne wana ofp of gut is ata mati of oho the acasnedtt of sound deren tote ial cout People Lanbera, GF No C1055, ‘p28, 1288) Effect of withdrawal: Sting aside ‘ot the Jusgent of canton and tha epening of De {a ow al spl Mende, Nw iy 20 1882). ‘accus IGHT TO COUNSEL. aly NN Egg co sp evet wpa te procure an tomy of ‘ost grat he aeons ‘counse de otcio Fees courted! eppoted by the cout epesant ‘and oto he accused n casa cannot ad > ‘poy one need. iho tay be appointed Counsel de ofc 1,Secn mori of tha tor agp standing whe tun comput duond ta occas 2imtocalieswbare such moribare of the bar ae zoiscomuustobarorcntns 402Seton squalis fom act 36 counsel do ‘enor he ther dsendan ne sare ee, However sthaugh te attomey appointed a¢ counee ce offen tod previously sppoared 96 private pesoctor inte caso, tk appear that caused wore propery defend, the spporiment IFtb0 srenaous ons reversible err (Poole 1 Wangbas, GFL Ne L1035289, September 9 ‘oeoy SECTION 3. muieigoR cour seoran cane cau General, a reasonabe ii Biscay x ‘SECTION 8 BILL OF PARTICULARS: ‘Accused may, aor bor araigneent, move bit of parislrs tn enable i fo prope lead ne papa fra Purpose: noe far the scouted tobe, tay ‘prised of the tue corges apa tom. has 500i ay anda posable supe, wich mht Ds Grmetal to tho nis and Inrosts (People ‘Road Soros, GF No Ls ne 17, 1980) Uke in et cass, heb of patios hare shud be conserod on terl part ofthe compa oF Intenraton which x suplmerts ‘Tho remedy agalnst an indemont that fas to ‘Blage'ine tine ot conmaion ofthe oe vith Sufisent detotorase le moton for abil of Swann courct oF Law 2015 COUTRALZAE Bag OPERATIONS 2000) ‘hota to aco bi of pariulars amourst> 2 water of sich ABR ana E depres hol fe fghtto objeto visor hh cau be lawl, ‘troduced and emits under an inmaten of ‘moro loss gonaral toms. wien selon, Shares’ we etendaris wi 3 deine me (Poepie ve Caradon, GR No. 167178, sansary 208). “Tis ng of moson obi of rarresuspercs tho etd a le teponsi pleasing. Upon fe ‘sore toll pertatasorafrthe token ot onal of uch mobon, he avant mus He is ‘epansve sleaaing wenn te remaning pat ‘When shat ot be less han fie (5) a (Rae See. 8)“ogyp(_CRIMINAL PROCEDURE )egames z > rote efoned sty, | tat wt es can “fie “2. bil af |resporahe posing Pariculats Ss he wil | can ast tor Sb SECTION 10, PRODUCTION on INSPECTION OF MATERIAL EVIDENCE IY POSSESSION CF PROSECUTION Aight to odes ot Discovery “RU otto oceuen 0 oe or ats oe rsesiton in ke poke Parmison ofthe cut? 2 Teens val pri uncon SA Fer Reo oe ano we Froeas parang ‘at Be ‘Dope distor tie Boe & fhe Piesuene posses ‘hte nod ot supe shal a esos ‘iy 6) dye aod tom pf fet: «Thre ai ponding aceon such as {att to Quen E-ANtion fr tontiin: at AMton fe Sn of Parla, Roe 117 Motion ro Quast ‘Section 1. TIME TO MOVE TOQUASH Motion to Quash ‘special ploadng fed by ths dofendent before sig nn utes pt hes Sind ate onan Se rea weg ee ae " pomearae “BEF p cepa estoy of iho i Wace = WEBET ana or cat etre of ena atlty: eect dona cs ome 0 nol aleged in ne nomen but tet dnl bythe posacon may be ate eee Suransseen mets General Rule: The accuses may move to quash {he comets or IMormeton ‘wt any ne, ees entering is ea xcopion: Instances wher ® mtn to quash ve te fone charge 23 Etincion of beaters pany, Teac el ben da Iecpany (orn tes Ne. 83756 Febnuay 181: arose. ‘GAN. 1240801, Fotmeay 28 2000, Note: ltt to fle» moten to gush belongs eny Sia Bena cousce or Law 2015 CevTRauzeD BaROrsranions | 403i ‘othe accused. Thee is sashing i the ula wen futnarzes ne court jg o mot propo ie ‘moton to queah (Peep va" David, GF No ‘o7bet 65, Fobra 7, 7000), ‘he motion fo quash not responsive pleasing “isnot aoeresaod to the compat but tthe Parr a pret eae {pproval ofthe cot nthe excise of del ‘rots, peas ofthe nate ef nonrsu o ‘Esconaarco mt eut and aren te mtr ite sarm condtion in wen twos Boe ne ‘omarcoreat of te" posecton int on Scat its not a inal postion ofthe cose; ad Fen nt bor @subeonuert prosecution fr the fare ofeae (Gover ver'CA gir NO. 114008, Caer 189) Flag @ motion to quash consequent results fh the eubmleston ofthe pereon of te accused ‘ete jrsaeton of the court ‘Generate: ing poadings socking stimsve ‘sot aust at a mon to qurah aque Yuriy {epesrancanuronser nd ho coneoduant ‘ubmiseon of ones parson tote jursdeion athe Sinenacousst or Lv 2015 Covrmauzen Bak Oreeaions eur. Guests on te jrscton over he perton tftne accused ae darned wats byte accuse ‘Won he fice any plsang tecking on sftmatve rin Exception: n cases of sesangs whose payer ‘ectaly forthe awoke othe pation of oe out, vein ony loads to 9 apecal appearance SInd does not need fe submit ores person To 9 pol inser 9 grounds ihr, than tie maton sept ack ot tog ove! te ofene choos and wen the “rot et gee. a tps las Py GHG wont ncn ot» Se et aS nck inguors cete ea aies rinse tence fs pe hn OF Re roa 24198) Fasdluton of @ Motion to Quash: A maton to {quash must be techved bole als cot ote the Peay ad deiarminain of sald rota tein on fw rte a wc pat the Po Th accuse specy Wil Nk Way so. be seaatved a the. praimnary Ibwestgaton since ihe investing ofa nar a power to shor lems the case. of bid Bat Eccssed ove fr al by Ge. proper cout, Sepending ons determination ef ace presence ‘sterebie cause (Omnibus Motion Rule Dwain attacing pleading, cde, jdgmon, or roading shat’ chide ah" obec, on Be deemed waved (fe 15 Sex 8).BB Bis CRIMINAL PROCEDURE quent eo plea, thee I a0 amnbus matin ns. Bee, fate toot me Rusa ot Gel Preceare; Grinds. must to tod in tba moto fo emis, Storie cannot be raed anymore. Thor ere Suah smiar provision in the Rvisod Puls of nwa Procedio. Ta imi 30, the Senos can fio over mations Yo qua wh Gfiorent grounds before the aragrmen ‘ample: M te accused fled 8 maton to quash 2 iat cout ring ‘ie he ote to He ae ‘8.That More than'one offense fs charged aaiéopt Siero arma mate AEE on oe aes RET pear Sie een, eceoete en Saas a See Note: Those gounds under fle 117, See 9 ore ‘cluave in aracar Accra, wo ol! {at leer praimanaryimestgabon nl ground {era maton fo quash, not only because ‘hod by te ro sone of tbe ground, bu lea osnice lac a preiminey Investatn doos ot GE Ose na diosiees Inga the vality of he infomation, does. ot (Seman toner selection sl Cond Soa ‘tojusacton cf the cour over ease (Boop Yili, GR No L32701, danny 27. 1989) 1 The facts charged donot constitute an otenge $e Shar mat toe ones ato Laer ee ra a Peas ‘oye cel cel esc he lege rts saraton, meters ose rc natn wf gen i ws Prien esas See try ee stirs, Bh. est [Blmaton, ¢besper'e Acumen Gn Aes 5300742, A 2,108." 2 Lack of Juredetion over the oftinse eels mew mane Sea ae rae ct Sere eg mee oh A Lack of Juecton over ne " ee pron of he ‘S10 Bua Couter or Law 2015 comaauzto Sun orearions 405CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Um at itoratan shen be: Se es a Socetineeie ees tess onctoena Ena salons i So nae ene Sota eae eohecs o Sree en Pp Sa orc een information is ta trout me confer inj 2 ES COLLEGE Ot ascending As nny in th gan ft nunonty of the Oat ae toy of otmen Chagas FAS iy 7.70 Criminal Action or Habllty has een Saingulshed Grounds tot Extinction of Criminal Libity (PC re 89) (HAD) {5 abet Baron 215) Brecon th ote; Sau Bs Couee oF Law 405 Zonscovrmauzi Bax OvexanoNs semen an 8 By Seve be sorence, Not: Where te a ay of he prensa paras {eting avomatoe's Say oe, ‘maton eno Enger hea ele ing Tec efor tsa ec tenes pusnsming SP he aaa, shure 24, 1885) ay 5 prt a a av 15 etons, whieh I rue, fercuse or ustiction trder ul 17, S07). om comma on Lan tone Select nthe corgi oe pe be bao of oon seer ha Poa ‘tendon intend! gaashing Jn both instances, tne mc to quash shal be, The protection fale to make the arene The complaint o¢ifrmaton sti eters froin In etme dfoc!dospo amereinan. Note! Whon the orginal compat sates a cause stn tl som mot, ‘anored compan 'e eee the eso preston we oe tne oft lg of he ea! compan “There Is nang nthe ros which saonaes ts ‘otto geo mots pop tate 8 maton fo ‘gush no” sin man yee ad 0s sessed‘People v Hittin GA Nos. 10758686, Febuary 2 Accuned shod goto Hl wihout preue to he me rec detonwer i mance ne rston oF {Appeal fom a Judgment of conan. any, xcept: Maton to quash bsed on’ lack of and iterpose ht Gon tthe motor 6 jussdton wich nay be rived or coined by rr. {te cour mon pros (Uy CA, A Mo 178000, ‘oy 28 197), SECTION 5. EFFECT OF SUSTANING THE orion ro quasi toot court sustains the Mo ‘ie and ote poten BPAIERE ove | expose nt a rrr noaubey tea cvtnat dose at wy, nel EO PURAS NE P pe SSEIOB 2 Vn fUstoay ortho cancelation of is bond he Sai 2 te gun wean ich tm motan io inan Se mano Gua ede ee ‘sie the cout hes con nce Sizes. teeta pocice I er he cout Fomand or Torwar Uo case the proper cou re Jeopardy dacause tar ere signet yt sed att qh tha compli or ntormation, the. demiseal wat obtaned wit) hs expose ProcedreitMotion to Quash ie denied: ‘Resved shoul load Suv seoa Cousce or Law zoiscomtmize Six Oroaions 407“Te question to be passed spn by the appaite gous pat op Sat shad be ama be remanded to the cova eign for hither Procecangs to dolerite gut or Iraconcs ot ‘SECTION 6, ORDER SUSTAINING THE MOTION To, QuaSH NOT ABA" TO ANOTHER ‘ners staining the meson oa i neh Props No.ar268 Pov 1% Kinds of double Jeopardy: {Ne person shal pu woe in eoprey fe ‘ame ofense (25. SAFNe-Mld) ‘2Whon an act punished Oya law, and an ‘ranencs, conveson or antl undo eer Shot ta bar fo smother pronsciton fr he Same at (CONST. Atl Se. 21) Note: The dog of double joparty has bear ‘fords "es judicata in prison grey” Ths (veal ofa cami prosecution iid ony ‘tee, net whenever pleas the ste Io do 9 (an # baron, CA. No. 854-82, Cobar 18, 1880, “Ra jst pier gry te cal ‘aw concapt of evel Joopauy (Tad v. Otee pg Gna GP oto, Oem, Sinn Cour oF La 408-2015 CovTanLzeD BAR CreaTONS ‘fat ba doendant eno uty GR No. 91755 sly 91,7008). ‘ante Saban, von fhe docson of eet was eroneout, ‘oseciton sll cannot appeal acon 86 t Sul pre secede Jopay Diemissa! wit Express Consent Expres consort t a provslon! mia is given ‘thor viva von orn wings» postva, ec ‘eguoral consent requing no rerenco oF8 eee ems lmofeaton supply ts meaning (People v. {exon GA Mo. 190489. Octber 72003 Genoral Rule: A dtmissal wit the expe ‘orzo ofthe accused wt net bar be proses Of the same conse becmee uch consent anidored ais waver offi apat dost ‘Reparsy (People. Sale, GA No L180, (coco 1, 7309, Exeeption: When 3 dlamisal even with ‘ven BY bresecuton) Sed ty the accuse aftr te poses Nh 2am a to tina of Bl Sone al nd pees a Gorda rote SI Re Ses can Novato eo “Teste for Determining whether ate Kenton Thor" ory ‘ens who ha necond ofa” 5s exact tho same otha eet 2's an atempt oor tustaon otha et, 3 nocoeartyncudeg ine st oF “(Nesmesarly Indudes th fe and Is necsetaly Ilused nthe offenso charge in feat ‘oman Excertions tothe 4 rule upon conviction for the Ft Ottance Charged Tine ‘tons The ples o uly tothe loner oon was ade ides the consent of prosooaor and oe ‘ileded party: except whan the sfonde pty fale osppea’curng be salman ‘Second OYense Necessarily theludes the Fret, (Ofonae: Whother the tats ao alleged nts second ifrmaton, I proved, would nate boos Sct ke susan We former intomaton, ton ‘3 secind lean, the accused May hone ‘een acquit or contd fo fat oopsarpa CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Petod tor ensttement: TOfersespuneble. "by impAscnment not ‘exceeding 8b (8) years ~ one (1) Year sor ‘seionen of me rasr 2otenses punirable by Imptsonment of more ‘ha sc (0) yoors~ tw (2) eae afte ssance oth oer {6 no covval of the cage is made. win the Dretentad prod the Ganmasal shal be terse ormty of sae mow pews ‘SECTION 9, FALURE TO MOVE TO QUASH OR ‘TOALLEGE ANY GROUND THEREFOR. ‘Argiendator 2 motion to quash ae waived tnt ‘tascnsy read before he lads, except SRmen te. infomation does rot chorge an ‘tee. aiade ot of the cout (People, ‘rn, FN. 86282, Febuary 28 1860 sEnton af he offence or pray (People v (Casvo, A, No 18407, ay 20,1054) ond «a Soubljeoparsy. ‘ph Beoa Cour oF Law 410. ots covteizD Bar OPEXTIONS 3 oF SECTION 1. PRETRIAL; MANDATORY IN CAMINAL CASES Purposes of Presi {roe tenses of he case; 270 shape up De tesbmeics an documents 1 record a at and 3 generally aw i erganie the dask ofthe ‘are forthoti. Importance of predriat ‘TiPeovere net ony Wat paid ecnlaly defined‘CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, in. le 198 a sos tat evi om ing of he Ircrmatn up to th scl cond! owt 2 Vlenconparses mary gal omedes such 38h fing of Maton o Guach (e117). Moon Y Suppress Evidarce Rule 120 Sec. 4), Motion {ordotemiaton of Probate Cause (le 12), {tistht pend when an accused may twos the presumption of acence an be assured tht he Fed not ayer do anything ese (td nach ore Ft ps pm Fetal Bargaining equied 6 | (Seeafaussion in le 116, Section 2) St” ne | Plasbararing tobe encccsoed 1 0483) 2 ain te Serial gombe nome ee Sec, 25). * " sforolamerna sone Seperate “Se Broa coucaeor Law ‘oiscovteumo Sanoesnnions 412RGRRER INN no ince inthe nando ‘spearance the Jfeae that te” naue tim ete vote, Sgawatine sessed ‘consiona igh remain tet. Requlstes betore the pro‘ial agreement can Bewsod ae endance ‘SECTION 4 PRE-TRIAL ORDER ‘TRetoees ewig, ang ‘Aer the prea confrencs he cout shall ove 2 Signed bythe acasses and hs coun, fp order reding the ectone taken, the fas Stpuatoa, ane extence mentee, (A, 8469, Sos Ihe agweorenss a estan to mater reeredioin 5 Sesion 2 hereot i subject to tha approval ofthe ut. Proved, tat he agrerant on he fhe castes to lesser ofones same fs contary law, ble fey (RA 845 Sa) atv is presence, 6 she Wrepie 1 Un GF No. 120 ‘siosments covering te ma ‘Sec af Rue 418 shall bo SECTION 3. NON-APPEARANCE AT PRE? ‘onrenehce Non-appearance at Pro-Tral Conference: Whore eran accepiable excuse fo hie lack of Note:The dacoaue ender uns count to the ‘Seperation, ‘he petal toa or idge may gh ofthe aocused tbe presumed Iocan an ‘npoue proper sanctons of poatioe (RA. £403, tho burda a pon (arise 11, Ses om hess see. ‘Heo esl in absurdly wore Be Accined pla ‘not uty but maybe roared "prove he ° The senctons o penalty may bein ie tor of mecenas’ he teronas “san Etta ‘epfvané, na of mprsoment. aemuch as tis dense isin ort contempt of cox tho pansy ‘eine contampl may bo imposed. ‘he accused ie ot the one competes fo sppee, {nly the ‘counsel for the aooued ot Poss. The pemeal rasan why secured le ‘Sin Ben Cousce oF Law 422 Zois couealzee aR OreeATONS