Experiments on Supersonic Impulse Turbine Eunhwan Jeong’ and Jinhan Kim’ Key Words: Supersonic( 22-49, Impulse( 3-5-8), Turbine( €}¥), Effeiencyl 28), Nozzle velocity ratio( s=% = ¥) ABSTRACT 16 MW class supersonic partial admission impulse turbine has been designed and tested in Korea Aerospace Research Institute for the liquid rocket engine application. The test has been performed using a high pressure air source facility in KARI For the turbine power absorption, a hydraulic dynamometer has been used. Appropriate similarity relations are used for the determination of test condition, Various settings of turbine pressure ratio and rotational speed are tested to investigate global turbine characteristics. From measured data, parameters related to the turbine design are derived and validated. “ZA (specific power FEU (adiabatic wor ‘ Ae olFolaeh oS Mah AWA (fuel-rich) SHE EASES so} 7} ake} aaa ye aya at oe 3088 ABE open ¢ dale AB IFS 7H aa Beals] SeYy/Fa AA, Ta/le Wb A, Falzeloid sa paste} 4 alg Solch. Wet Sel ye Ss) Me 29] a “Qslol th. 1S FAINYQNOM Hay 9] A}ol9H| IPS (inter~ propellant seal) Fo] 710& H7]ec. MEMS] oe & Fig.1ol Heart B SEM pola 284 SEA Bee at ait ee TAS S solid. @ 2 = WPAopen-cycle) 4a] 2AM) ABs e AAD aA paso] AASSo) Veelor BZ AACE EylS] Abu] a ] AA BBS vlalou] ee deel yb lA + eRaeesey AA} E-mail: jeh@karire ke Fig. 1 a0 ton cass tufbopur 26 MIMS: MOM, MGB, PP.25-22, 2005( SENG M2004, 10,25, ALAbeE eT: 2006, 11.23)ASS SSH Cplol HS AA Dat & AH S a] BINS ALS At olFfolztey. Tey 7S. ee AAeHS AANA QAR BAe} UFA7I7] Mal AE Tt AOz o]so}x) 47h Bch. ole ah Hes] BE wo) ES Fa NFS 284 SE¥e] He s|n} yale AS Fee else] PeeAbpartial admission) G43 Aa eet. HE SEIS Aol ee 2a sp dal wl BE) 27ade} web wal Aa 264 SEY Blo Wet AAS Felch. Zhe Fa aAza clsto}. des] eepststat 4) gal) HABLA Hale] sao} 7seaishey. NA Aap 4444 HFOm} me oR SAA] Qoyy ey tse. 2, ERISA Table 14] Eldar ANB FA WEES Yet WS, BARTER VA eb NR AA LAG HAS Bal Foe laa aa] Be BYE He FE Table 2ol Pelstateh. of w FES AA) BW FEMS Sal A Ft Be WEA % gle Aahoe AAMC Lae Als} 2a HEALS BA] Ep GAA] a7), SD SI) AF, HERAP, AS BYES] Fo} in) of82] BHA (mean line) AS] ENYA CAML, Be APY YaRE, Fee) ely {Ye} aagstolziey. Table Soh Lay eles] FQ VARS UepAg. ASW] habe 32} a ASAT F896} LED 7c Bae, He 1 RAIS} VIS aI, ‘Table 1 Turbine design parameters as va eleewo. a2 aTee aan | Cavitation’ ae dapdes aa, aAgaatere 24 ‘Table 2 Turbine shape related design parameters aa ua eel 1~1.5% of Dep saa a 06-05 Aspect Ratio ALT Mt FEAF 0183-097 #9) FEA 08-09 ‘Table 3 Design conditions for the supersonic impulse turin SAAS | daale date ag, qUITe, BeaaDp) | HL AeA ABS aes) Lg Ws deed | daa ad 8 18 ASE ae WaT quad aed We BAA) peop = (@, 0 MANA 7S] Sa SHIH Aa, 6%, 2005 as KARI Eyl i sea at 1 He 8% rom 20.000 eel ates, K 00, P8(Pa/Pd 1445 wae 0253, aul 8, kW 1,660 He Re % 8 3. EIRIALBL 3.1 ASH) aa Aes BefTara ull dale ast O7) SHAS ADEG WES Fig. 244 4 eygich. ©] Behe 40m? 842] Sao) anit 320 bar2| B71E A#ee] Aol 9) Sat F ES lols ate] Ble we) 2871 (regula— tor) Sa] 488 don Ae Aso] ge ae Belalte] gee] 28S ole} o}Fofalcy. P| BERBSIS AE AM WALA] PY ol Bala. Hebe te] S(venturi_no— ze) %u(Fig. 3)2 AQ 1$mm9] us SS 2 229 AG F RA (choking) FAS 28a}. ABA Sdsehs sete} esse paola ARIS FVILL AY E84 yy a7 + 0.9883 Bojulsich. RAS SI Use BILE 2Ae At tae US Sse} Fed wp daa aa = Hal Able] SCthroat)S shee}, ey B A) Bes MUS Abs] dekh. ys Sap dele AS4OE GIABRS Fits] HWS PEt FS 7 YSASH GUY wdeas Mat 2of haat Bal s)oiet. elle W7PAe, FAFSA ol Fo}a|e] 1 “3 Fig. 404 UEh gach. ABE Ele Aas SUG AK alats|ghon| EUsaas at 2s eee cL vet Spr TM, ce aa, AIST, ela SPE Fes} Balehshch wr i able 4°} Jelsistt. ‘ow straightener Fig. 3 Vertur type flowmeter Fig. 4 Turbine test rig Table 5 Oynammometer spec. (Froude Consine, F249) as aa BAL = TD RW ag Ea 1272 Nm | aid a): 14000 mm aa aes Bo <132Nm (025% of full scale load) wae lpm 1 ole 61 VWeh ek 2-4 bar HE AHR #22 Bt cpolopzaly aaak AGe AA(TIE model, Sensotec) & “H3}i¢}, EMA Moe el Seabee eel eee) zs (diaphragm) 8415] 2S Hal 7 wi7/Mes AMeeteich duel Bal = GAZ8el AW? TEMA (globe valve) Et Yo} Bus} 44] Als SHS FA2E so} 4 20 mAS} A7la1Sol dato} AACS ASRS 414 (electro~pneumatic linear positioner) & Sal Foye. Sas] BR] Baza} azisto} alae} yale} BAZ Froude Consine*}3] #815-42I (Hydraulic Dynamome— ter, model F249) A}e}9tch. F249 FASE SANA HBS, 2005284 SSe ejulol et Nees aa AS T50kWHl4} ao} BASS 14,000 rpm Al AHe] 7Hesheh. FEES AS epele] Sat AS oa SS 2S Fal Fret F249 +A Fell 2) 44 Ad) 5.5 liter/sec] $HSS2 TAL S Th Oo] B2}2) Abalet Ale Table 5] els}aich. F249 +288eae Seal Aleiaai(Texcel V 1002 2d. o| aloe a4, WELT Se} BEE £655) +E5A M4 4498 FE, ES LL G2 BY AEE O1Bs}0) Ol} oO} ovat. Hole] 54I(data acquisition system, DAS) CS (control system) 2} MS(measure~ ment system) 2.3 F4s|=0) CSE T3871 BRE VI AS slop W aetelo]e|gs alojape} ARAL $9 WIS EUTWET. MSE Aaa AG Saat 24, AVS cole] YB, tela A) B ole} Ae] S27 FVeh AGS AS!) WHECaccuracy)S DAY & ahi As} SETA] ESSA] VRE opt 7d em aA Saas] BES L.2%olel ZO UEbECh. 3.2 Alt SB wah aNoe Eee) Peles aa) Aa7la. Ol dd Br PIS lesie Pods Fase BF7t Beh ole 7AWe Ue ABA Bt OS SolD Hz S38 77) 2H) Way] Bh Sut PACs etsy] WEolch. ee 7A Yet Ga7Ae wa Ast ASS] ee HU TEs) WE SUS FES Fev] MA SAS Aa) SS AAryry ad Fe ao] ol solzyal ath. AABAS Wile Wlsar, MEST bt + 2am WSE-ddFa(Goal Ge Ase OA ¥), UGE BALA SUA BITS EA Gold + gen) PA Gr = obs} Zo] asia. Gy P2= Lays = G Ten (BI Boo i) wm BE dole2r2] BFE Aolware] Be oO] A} aed BABES SP KES USE RUINS HER, HGS, 2005 ‘Table 6 Turing test siilanty condition (design point) ee ua__[ aaa | asd TIAA kgk R14 tL viel : me |_1@ sae om | 200 | 9170 aaatee K xo | 28 spare [MPa a7 | 150 a CUCad) - ox | 028 sbsiei) - 1445 1352 ae % DS OB a4 KW. 16 | 208 = WAATS SUSRPHY AAPLUS chil oy. Elel Aaa at AAS Table Gol UENH a. AWAGe BVIAIS Faeged 2a MB ACS BAVA HE Wess AA WV] Baas Sdate ele] aalae Aesde a7] deel. 2 gage] Azde els) As YEA" +4 -SA AS) 7H ESISS Dep Be} Agathe. AGE Fold wWpse Bsel debe} Bars alate shde| Saabs Sojujgeea) wi7)pa B Ags} eel eh ute] FARE THE UE atch. 7S] AVS PIAA a Fy Bap Balxeé V8 4 85a v7 aga quay) 2) BAS NBA. HSE) ashe Tele AS SU JAFE AUG Fa Tash. 4. MB ABE Table Gol Yea YAN stehw) AF] cH 7s] Agel aso) Paetsch. epee ef ‘a St teHet Ashes} SPT VWseee] wie wee th. Folal en) AACES wpe] 2¥)el a a Hels] sales Sle] ob eel eS oR] wayh slgieh 2 AY RASS Table 704 Bela. Fig. 5= 27 HZUY HSE Babel chs eel AE(total to static) 2] WIS Gera PLAS 2 test dol Belsied, efficeneylt—3) = Wings, @gee uaet Table 7 Test condtions qe [wre] ae] vee | saree mae | ate) | apa, aie) |_ (eM) coset | 5% | 22 156 | 4000~12000 cased | 566 | 124 156 | 4000~12000 cad | axe | 129 156 | 4000~12000 case | 8896 | 136 18 | 000-1200 cad | 886 | 210 295 | 3000~12000 efficioney(ts) 000 = ole 020030 Uhy Fig. 5 Tutbine charactoristcs efficiency vs. UiCad WS me At EMS ARGS elpetch. Fold UML hah SET: Sree oe} AE © Brew Ole WS MSE AMS she HE RARE S54 ele] quad Sel. wee dene) det She AES Boled oe +FH— ae 2845288 7H Bel] Syoe eul7y S7e SEAPCAASESM Ue SE bP Bah SAE] ut S7baes Blo 7iebebeh. Aha) WAL, A) SE DZ geo eels] RAE 1a a Al ASA) 50.8%} FARE 49.3%% Epc 4b BASS AAU Gylo] de HVSEG WS 7 28 3a HEA S RSTO] 57.5%6R 42 ¥ Al AS 213REE) ofS ARM ME Ae alos ABSA) VS Zell 7ieheich Fig. 6& 884 (corrected power) | M4S, 4 Heol HE WSS epi, BASaAS EY AS (W// Tele) = AALS BWwWASS a ASF th. 20 Corrected Power Fig, 6 Turbine characterstics : conected power vs. UICad Fig 72 EaS2) Was Beles 7ey 28 YEN elt NE BASS N/VTo7Te = AAA. DAA Hela raap w7lwss| Agel Hate AHS PAGO et Sey] Eel elle (5% ON) SAS S + eh. Tey elelal Tt AVF Se ST Bets) ME deh felals ke & Vy] aapol cS wae Ae teuls} et ale] ABS UehSHl oS fig Bell Hehisich. Fig. 8& cased 4} 4h] SW Ze 5141 Fel HS eS seule) BS de Ale) Ta ol & Ke) eS ewe sare) aE Ba SS Hele + Uh. obs Awe] AF HSA SB Hol et PEAS eee] Hz} REL] sal SS we} delle fee) alse7t easel AP ANTES S29) Eo ay Agee, me) ASS Hulse] AF Belo] ay7t AHS ZY AMHSSEM AVA VHS lala oR A a ee EP SHIM tee] Wabi ach. Fig Gels cased AG SMS Sah AA! Se] UT | SE AS) alalpel wHE Was 7h los ehusich THA att BS At Aa SAbb AREAS Anlst] Ae AaGE(C), AAS AMS (wy) MES peach. Ho]al ata} 3] AS, Ted Stele] Ja Sesetae Aas led sae7t SR oe} SHES AAT ah) 2 eS Bae) 722 ae w(under— expansion) #)¢] #}d)-8%(over—expansion) AZ MPA A HSE BAREIB)S 7] S22 2 OU AS Plz oI, Ole 2EGx BHDIIANE IBM, HIBS. 2005£86 S59 Cell He AHA ae ware on x11 1.05 «0.88 Keb ow & & Rap xo cael ce? coos cere aes xxone o 5) 1 5 0 Turbine pressure ratio Fig. 7 Tutine characterises : efficiency vs. turbine pressure ratio EAS LASS Heol get dea a ay Ree WAM. cased S24 HYSE LA FE At, PEGE, FEVER Table Sol Pelagic. S488 ceveue Fa GUA $2 as shel KSFEANCS Asal + gked Walt A auld 2 we 0.8% AAR 0.883) & Ao} S HEA. obs AH Ball MEST te Bo] 4494S wie qed GEAre ese) eFe Poole TAMA SA rs Sol set 2aedS EMH AA HNRHeE ALE Belch E44 2 F QE] SEA PATI S71 me} oF Baste} Te} cased] BF thee + EAE 0,91, case3é 0.78 AFZ AW Beye) SIVt SEATS S7UOR UH RAS A AA olf} Ba E+ Uch Pig. 5. 7 32) Fig. 102 cased ABLGIA GM ZF DA sh SAS Ue O~4 Table dol Heb HHS} So] Ht, SET, LAST, BIST WET & eich. Fig. 10 (b= @S Faq aol Heb Zleley. eel BE 712] BE Pale] BS Sa Mole SS9 Gul Awad dae ES Belt Fig. 10 (WE HAF S7e HE XS deule] Ges ca] Peles + eh. Aalst Be] Be] APB A—2)ela ete] ghey Aol EAT ole Cla UBBEY Spee] wey ah BS ASIA AV.< 0.66) BR AS Saka] seteel S7bshed) ols Helse} & Sal So] Wee} Yes Arlee Beet SRDIIMS MBH. MGS, 2005 cost gs |e, fs i D 5 i ° 2 ° z ma Fa 8 Note pessve flo verter wih eed 1 tal go Tele 8 Fo aay ts cs 4 Caset : a] NeNed [Se GSH) (avs) (cx) 0.44 M2 40 BS 0.66 139 AB a7 os [as [ar [wo a a Lab 130, 42 161 ZA a at Fe. 9 Voreon of welt ange wh rant speed + STMBb|G-DAIE S7 feWdoe cal Aetee] Uae AHS Fels + eh. 5.42 Be EEis errata Wee 264 SSS HV Ae AGAMS Beata. 31Besa ~SNina soe @ ast ons cased me Nav 3 wave x NING ae NN . SENN Soe . . i en 4 1 2 08 Sta, No w) Fig. 10 Pressure distibuiton in tutine for various rational soeed AAT el AE chy 72) see) gel dele] GES Ball BASS Seah} Ba Pets Bogor AAP] Ges 49.3% SIA AARS 50.8%). bee} sar aialel THE Sebe ule] was} ool] mE HE zbS) waste Hato} TA Aeol AsG7t BS ByoyAy Hlxee 342499 VHe SEH Bal Patel ole] Bal heulel 7H AS Veht Aa) a At oils Ade JAS AES Hele BAGS AA] Aal els} aarelA aa & (18°) 7H AHS EMULOM Base] | Bel Ge} BUF SEA(ES EAN al Ba SE Ho) MBH SESE] AIA ASS selat Bry elel ute] Geshe Sele Azp epee} APYe] Wea} Sasly) ole Ue Ga] HR o] Ba + NSO] Helsiaet. Hae] AS Ede so} Bay eel 171 AAA Sols} Aa) clojebo|A Bus Hal web ae ALS EE oleh, azEe G) 24, gale, 9A, 2003, “225 Bea HUY] TAs Bee ae aa aa ws Tas,” GHEE TAS] Vol. 31, no. 8, pp. 99~106, (2) Noh, J. Gi Lee, E. Si Kim, J. Hs Lee, D. S. 2004, CFD Analysis of Partial Admission Turbine Using a Frozen Ro— tor Method, Asia Joint Conference on Propulsion and Power, AJCPP 2004, Seoul National University. (3) SET, BSA, eA, Wale, 2004, “BRS EE 792 olde HESS ele) alas,” HAIAA ATA 6S, lalla Stratford, B. S,; Sansome, G. E,, 1959, ‘The Performance of Supersonic Turbine Nozzles, A.R.C. R&M 3273, June, 1959. (5) Johnston, I. H., Dransfield, D. C., 1959, ‘The Test Performance of Highly Loaded ‘Turbine Stages Designed for High Pre~ ssure Ratio, ARC. R&M 3242, June, 1959. (6) ZEA, AFA, DAE, ole, dale, 2004, “ASS AN Vee] HeSgel dat Wea a FT” AS3] FA EAB, pp. 67~ 73. 2004. 5, #3}. 4 BRIAN S:NBA, MGS, 2005