Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Book Content .U PDF

    Uploaded by

    Noble BernisEarl McGill El Bey
    7 views1 page

    Original Title

    book content .u..pdf

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views1 page

    Book Content .U PDF

    Uploaded by

    Noble BernisEarl McGill El Bey

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1
    At bachnen AFFIDAVIT Of Truth Tribal (Sovereign) & Imperial (Crown) IMMUNITY Verified Statement of Noble BernisEarl McGill El Bey Ancient Imperial Aborigine Moors are out of Interregnum June 25, 2016 Library of Congress Certificate No. TXu-2-049-663 Sagamores of Turtle Island Cherokee Nation of Moors Pursuant 38 § 14 ir ‘ursuant to NCGS § 1-85. Affidavits on hearing for removal; when removal ordered. No action, civil or criminal, shall be removed, unless the affidavit sets forth particularly and in detail the ground of the application. ie aut Court preserimens, wherein the State & Federal United States District, Superior and Federal Courts ice: To States, Municipalities, Law Enforcement and Court Officers — Notice to the Principal is 1e Agent - Notice to the Agent is Notice to the Principal. ooo aaa Now Comes; Noble BemisEar! McGill El Bey: living soul, executor of his own Estate haven taken first lien right ownership over all his and his children’s chattel paper property, names and numbers. Cannot be now or in the future be considered a minor. Derivatives thereof, contracts created knowingly and unknowingly from the time of creation are owned by Noble BernisEarl McGill El Bey. Further standing Noble BemnisEarl McGill E Bey: is a member of the Cherokee Nation of Moors - North Carolina Territory with sovereign immunity. The Jurisdiction for his matters does not lay within any admiralty maritime court system, operating (on water). Noble BemisEarl MeGill El Bey is not a party to any contracts implied, adhesion or otherwise by or for the State of North Carolina or any other State that would bind or waive his sovereign immunity at law. All adhesion contracts regarding traffic, legal, state and federal matters have been satisfied and appeared to by special visitation, verified statement. This is one of the devices thatthe State Trustee and Federal Trustee is using to falsely impede the commerce of Noble BernisEarl McGill El Bey’s movement in commerce on the land in which he has title to and is considered part and parcel thereof, This essentially means that Congress has the final word as to the scope of tribal sovereignty and the powers that Tribes are able to exercise. 1. One exception to this general rule is the doctrine of tribal ity. Tribal sovereign immunity is part of federal common law; it was not ereated by any statute or act of sovereign immut Congress. 2. Rather, the Supreme Court first identified it, and its exact boundaries have been further defined through a ‘substantial body of federal case law. 3. A. THE DOCTRINE OF TRIBAL SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY. The Supreme Court first acknowledged tribal sovereign immunity in Turner y. United States. 4. In which @ non-Indian lessee was barred from suing an Indian tribe for alleged damage done to his property [Noble BernisEarl McGill Fl Bey’ Private Indigenous Affairs ‘Ancient Imperial Aborigine Moors are out of Interregnum June 25, 2016. Library of Congress Certificate No. TXu-2-049- 6663. 5. The Court stated that itis the “general law” that “[I]ike other governments, municipal as well as stat, [tribes ae] free °6. In United States v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 7. the from liability for injuries to persons or property Supreme Court reiterated that Indian tribes are immune from suit when it voided a monetary judgment from a previous fations.8. It stated that tribes do not waive their sovereign immunity when n Puyallup Tribe, Inc. v. Department of Game of State of Washington. 10 in Indian country “[aJbsent an effective proceeding against the Choctaw and Chickasaw N: they fail to object to cross-claims in litigation. 9. the Court held that a state could not sue a tribe to enforce its fishing regulation States. 11. In Santa Clara Pueblo v. Martinez. 12. the Court expanded ‘waiver or consent” from either the Tribe or the United immunity “must be unequivocally expressed.” Puyallup’s holding by stating that any waiver of tribal i ywatomi Indian Tribe. 14. The Court rejected a contention that was 13. In Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Citizen Band Pota nearly identical to the one it had addressed in United States Fi tribal immunity as black letter law. 15. In Kiowa Tribe of Oklah Court, for the first time, declared that Native American tribes were i ‘deity over a half-century prior, further solidifying the status of

    You might also like