HASIL STATISTIK

A. Karakteristik Responden

Usia_L
Frequency Percent Valid Cumulative
Percent Percent
< 20 Tahun 2 13.3 13.3 13.3
20-35 tahun 11 73.3 73.3 86.7
Valid
> 35 tahun 2 13.3 13.3 100.0
Total 15 100.0 100.0

Pendidikan_L
Frequency Percent Valid Cumulative
Percent Percent
SMA 11 73.3 73.3 73.3
Valid PT 4 26.7 26.7 100.0
Total 15 100.0 100.0

Pekerjaan_L
Frequency Percent Valid Cumulative
Percent Percent
Bekerja 8 53.3 53.3 53.3
Tidak
Valid 7 46.7 46.7 100.0
Bekerja
Total 15 100.0 100.0

Usia_P

Frequency Percent Valid Cumulative

Percent Percent
< 20 tahun 1 6.7 6.7 6.7

20-35 tahun 12 80.0 80.0 86.7

Valid
> 35 Tahun 2 13.3 13.3 100.0

Total 15 100.0 100.0

Pendidikan_P

Frequency Percent Valid Cumulative

Percent Percent
 SMA 8 53.3 53.3 53.3

Valid PT 7 46.7 46.7 100.0

Total 15 100.0 100.0

Pekerjaan_P
Frequency Percent Valid Cumulative
Percent Percent
Bekerja 8 53.3 53.3 53.3
Tidak
Valid 7 46.7 46.7 100.0
Bekerja
Total 15 100.0 100.0

B. Uji Normalitas

Case Processing Summary

group Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
A.Lavende pretest 15 100.0% 0 0.0% 15 100.0%
r posttest 15 100.0% 0 0.0% 15 100.0%

Tests of Normality
group Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
*
A.Lavende pretest .149 15 .200 .936 15 .333
r posttest .203 15 .095 .889 15 .064
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

Case Processing Summary

kelompok Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
A.pepermin pretest 15 100.0% 0 0.0% 15 100.0%
t posttest 15 100.0% 0 0.0% 15 100.0%

Tests of Normality
kelompok Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.
*
pretest .175 15 .200 .933 15 .298
A.pepermin
posttest .203 15 .095 .889 15 .064
t
*. This is a lower bound of the true significance.
a. Lilliefors Significance Correction

C. Uji Paired T Test

Paired Samples Statistics

Mean N Std. Deviation Std. Error
Mean
pretest_Lavender 10.07 15 1.486 .384
Pair 1
Posttest_lavender 4.27 15 1.033 .267

Paired Samples Correlations

N Correlation Sig.
pretest_Lavender &
Pair 1 15 -.199 .478
Posttest_lavender

Paired Samples Test

Paired Differences t df Sig. (2-
Mean Std. Std. 95% tailed)
Deviatio Error Confidence
n Mean Interval of the
Difference
Lower Upper
pretest_Lavender - 11.39
Pair 1 5.800 1.971 .509 4.708 6.892 14 .000
Posttest_lavender 6

Paired Samples Statistics

Mean N Std. Deviation Std. Error
Mean
pretest_pepermint 11.07 15 1.944 .502
Pair 1
posttest_pepermint 4.47 15 1.060 .274

Paired Samples Correlations

N Correlation Sig.
pretest_pepermint &
Pair 1 15 .192 .494
posttest_pepermint
 Paired Samples Test
Paired Differences t df Sig. (2-
Mean Std. Std. 95% tailed)
Deviatio Error Confidence
n Mean Interval of the
Difference
Lower Upper
pretest_peper
mint - 12.60
Pair 1 6.600 2.028 .524 5.477 7.723 14 .000
posttest_pepe 2
rmint

D. Uji T-Test

Group Statistics
group N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error
Mean
A. Lavender 15 5.80 1.971 .509
Mual_Muntah
A.PepperMint 15 6.60 2.028 .524

Independent Samples Test

Levene's t-test for Equality of Means
Test for
Equality of
Variances
F Sig. t df Sig. Mean Std. 95% Confidence
(2- Differen Error Interval of the
tailed ce Differe Difference
) nce Lower Upper
Equal
-
variances .085 .772 28 .283 -.800 .730 -2.296 .696
1.095
Mual_ assumed
Munta Equal
h variances - 27.97
.283 -.800 .730 -2.296 .696
not 1.095 7
assumed