Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FACTS:
As narrated by AFP, Atty. Roque fomented disorder by inciting his clients
to scale the perimeter fence, to see Pemberton. Thus, AFP filed a
disbarment complaint against Atty. Roque, before the IBP. On the same
day, respondent Cabunoc, AFP Public Affairs Office Chief called a
conference at Camp Aguinaldo, and publicly announced that a
disbarment complaint had been filed against Roque. Cabunoc also
distributed a press statement regarding the disbarment case. Roque
claims that AFP's acts put to question his professional and personal
reputation. However, AFP countered that the press statements are not
among the contumacious acts prescribed under Section 3, Rule 71 of the
Rules of Court.
ISSUE:
Whether the press statement merits punishment for contempt.
HELD:
No. The power to punish for contempt should be invoked only to
ensure or promote the proper administration of justice. Accordingly,
when determining whether to declare as contumacious alleged
violations of the confidentiality rule, we apply a restrictive
interpretation.