You are on page 1of 9

Journal of Cleaner Production 258 (2020) 120579

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

Journal of Cleaner Production


journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jclepro

External and internal economic impacts of eco-innovation and the


role of political connections: A sustainability narrative from an
emerging market
Gracezelda Latupeirissa , Desi Adhariani *
Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Indonesia, Indonesia

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t

Article history: Eco-innovation is an evolving area of research and might have practical implications for cleaner pro-
Received 12 June 2019 duction. While the identification of eco-innovation’s economic consequences has been widely investi-
Received in revised form gated in the extant literature, many questions remain regarding its impact in the context of developing
11 February 2020
countries. This study investigates the effects of eco-innovation on the cost of equity capital and corporate
Accepted 13 February 2020
financial performance as well as the role of political connections as a moderating variable in Indonesia as
Available online 15 February 2020
an emerging market. The samples are all nonfinancial companies listed on the Indonesian Stock Ex-
Handling editor: Charbel Jose Chiappetta change from 2011 to 2016. The data are processed using the panel regression method. This study finds
Jabbour that eco-innovation does not affect the cost of equity capital or company performance. However, political
connections do, and they moderate the association between eco-innovation and the cost of equity capital
Keywords: but in a positive direction. This implies that political connections cannot generate investor trust via the
Eco-innovation eco-innovation efforts of companies.
Cost of equity © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Financial performance
Political connections

1. Introduction involves the public disclosure of information pertaining to the


environmental performance of companies. The program is driven
For business survival, global competition demands that com- by a reputational incentive linked to environmental performance.
panies innovate. Firm innovation involves new ways of thinking as Thus, companies are pressured to build or maintain a good repu-
regards providing technological, economic, and social solutions tation for market survival. It is generally thought that companies
related to current operations (Albu and Stelea, 2015). These new concerned with environmental performance will generate more
mindsetsdmotivated by the need to compete for survivald urge profits, which will ultimately help them survive longer in the global
businesses to pursue all means of improving their performance marketplace (Fernando and Wah, 2017). Therefore, innovation is a
without necessarily considering the natural environment. good way of improving environmental performance.
For example, in the context of Indonesia, according to the Appropriate eco-innovation efforts, in the right combinations,
Indonesian Ministry of Environment and Forestry, in 2015, 269 boost both company and environmental performance. Sarkar
mining, manufacturing, energy, oil, gas, infrastructure, services, and (2013) outlined many benefits for innovators of eco-innovation,
agribusiness companies generated 125,540,827.76 tons of hazard- including image, supplier relationships, customers, and author-
ous and toxic waste. This demonstrates a continued lack of atten- ities (i.e., indirect benefits). There are also operational benefits,
tion paid to the natural environment. To overcome this, various such as cost savings from greater resource productivity and better
government efforts have been promulgated, including the launch- logistics and sales from commercialization (i.e., direct benefits).
ing of the Rating of Company Performance (PROPER) program, Eco-innovation behavior’s impact on a firm’s environmental per-
implemented to promote firm compliance to legislation. This formance was documented in several studies, including Cai and Li
(2018) and Salim et al. (2019). Financial benefits were docu-
mented by Cheng et al. (2014), Przychodzen and Przychodzen
(2015), and Ryszko (2016).
* Corresponding author.
Research on the contexts of emerging markets has also been
E-mail addresses: sesillatu@gmail.com (G. Latupeirissa), desi.adhariani@ui.ac.id,
desi.adhariani@ui.ac.id (D. Adhariani). performed. According to Latan et al. (2018), organizational

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120579
0959-6526/© 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
2 G. Latupeirissa, D. Adhariani / Journal of Cleaner Production 258 (2020) 120579

resources had a positive impact, comprising corporate environ- This study answers several research questions. “Does eco-
mental strategy, top management commitment, and environ- innovation impact the cost of equity and financial performance
mental uncertainty regarding the use of environmental (‘the two variables’)?” “Does political connection impact the two
management accounting, which in turn might improve the envi- variables?” While the two questions have been widely answered in
ronmental performance of companies in Indonesia. Upon previous research in a variety of contexts (Przychodzen and
comparing eco-innovation and business performance in emerging Przychodzen, 2015; Boubakri et al., 2012), the present research
and developed economies, Santos et al. (2019) found that nearly all focuses on other scarcely-addressed questions related to political
environmental and social eco-innovation variables were significant connections: “Do political connections drive eco-innovation?” and
in their respective dimensions in the developed countries, while “Can political connections moderate the association between eco-
only two environmental and social variables were significant in innovation and the two variables?” Bitencourt et al. (2020) per-
emerging countries. This highlights the more advanced stage of formed a meta-analytical review of eco-innovation, including an
eco-innovation in developed countries. Using a case study examination of its drivers and moderators, but did not mention
approach, Aloise and Macke (2017) found that eco-innovation ini- political connections as a variable. Bringing these factors into the
tiatives are still scarce in developing countries. Among those rare arena of eco-innovation research will advance the literature in this
efforts, a case study from Fernando et al. (2016) on furniture regard. Hazarika and Zhang (2019) found that regulatory instru-
manufacturers in Indonesia, which represented small to medium mentsdthe set of techniques implemented by the governmentd-
enterprises, indicated that a green network is an emerging driver play an integral role in encouraging companies to pursue eco-
that might contribute to eco-innovative practices, aside from other innovation. Based on this finding, a premise regarding political
factors such as regulation, technology, and firm-specific market and connections, which includes connections with the government, can
supply factors. However, another case study from Susilawati and be developed and become the normal reasoning behind the eco-
Kanowski (2019) in an Indonesian pulp and paper value chain, innovation incentive. The method used to answer the research
which represents a large enterprise, suggested that high levels of questions is quantitative panel regression based on 220 and 223
compliance with sustainability and legality requirements were only companies listed in the Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX) from 2011
demonstrated in audit reports, while their fieldwork indicated that to 2016.
these reports might not reflect some areas of poor performance and By investigating the eco-innovation issue and answering the
non-compliance. research questions, this study provides theoretical and practical
Other studies in the context of developing countries are needed contributions. The theoretical contributions are twofold. First, this
to confirm the stage, which also motivated us to perform this research fills a research gap on the impact of eco-innovation on the
research. In contrast, the impact of eco-innovation on the cost of cost of equity as an external impact. This topic is relevant to un-
equity is another topic that has been rarely studied. El Ghoul et al. derstanding how eco-innovation initiatives can be appropriately
(2011) and Hajawiyah et al. (2019) researched the relationship appreciated in an emerging market, especially Indonesia’s. Second,
between corporate social responsibility (CSR) and the cost of cap- given the dearth of eco-innovation research in emerging countries,
ital. However, because CSR is not necessarily an eco-innovation, a this study is expected to contribute to the literature of eco-
research gap remains. innovation and its economic impact. Third, this study contributes
Given the many benefits available to Indonesian companies that to the literature of political connections by examining its impact on
eco-innovate, this study examines its external effects on the cost of eco-innovation and its role in moderating eco-innovation and in-
equity capital and its internal effects on financial performance. In ternal and external factors. Practically, this study contributes to the
Indonesia, PROPER compliance is in its infancy. A study conducted practice of eco-innovation initiatives by presenting the types of
in an emerging market such as ours should encourage more firms innovation that have been conducted by Indonesian companies. We
to innovate. also analyze the benefits on the cost of equity and financial
Apart from the research gap, political connections raise ques- performance.
tions of “effect”. In Indonesia, companies incur costs related to This paper is structured as follows: Section 2 discusses the un-
processing and storing waste per PP No.100, 2014. Given that derpinning theory of this research by citing previous literature,
government regulations often change, firms address the uncer- leading to hypothesis development. Section 3 presents the research
tainty by seeking added value, such as political connections. In the method, followed by results and discussions. A conclusion is pro-
extant literature, political connections are defined as connections vided in Section 5 with research implications and limitations.
by members of a company’s board of commissioners and directors
who had or are currently serving as heads of the central or regional 2. Theoretical perspective
governments, legislative members, ministers or ranks of cabinet,
political party officials, or other political positions, such as mem- Stakeholder theory is often used as the basis of research related
bers of the military and ambassadors, as disclosed in annual reports to sustainability performance (Rezaee, 2016) and factors affecting
(Faccio, 2006; Fan et al., 2007; Habib et al., 2017). These connec- eco-innovation (Hojnik and Ruzzier, 2016). It argues that com-
tions are important and incentivize companies to improve perfor- panies should pay attention to all stakeholders (Jensen, 2002).
mance. However, political connections can both strengthen and According to Freeman (1999 p.41), a stakeholder is any group or
weaken environmental innovation and impact performance and individual influenced by or affecting the achievement of a com-
the cost of equity capital. Political connections can weaken envi- pany’s organizational goals. Stakeholders are important for eco-
ronmental efforts when companies leverage them to avoid regu- innovation. They comprise shareholders, customers, employees,
lation offenses. Conversely, they can strengthen efforts when suppliers, distributors, and local communities (Freeman, 1999). In
companies use them to promote innovation and teamwork with the this respect, eco-innovation is considered a company’s response to
government. Besides examining the effects of eco-innovation on external demands from stakeholders rather than an internal
equity and performance capital costs, this study examines the role mechanism to exploit or explore new markets (Santos et al., 2019).
of political connections on the cost of equity, eco-innovation, and Apart from stakeholder theory, related to eco-innovation, the
performance, and it studies the moderating effect of political con- resource-based theory is commonly used. This theory states that a
nections between eco-innovation and equity capital costs and company’s internal resources are its fundamental strengths in
company performance. terms of running the business or implementing the strategy
G. Latupeirissa, D. Adhariani / Journal of Cleaner Production 258 (2020) 120579 3

(Barney, 1991). A company’s resources include its assets, capabil- (2014) found that reducing carbon emissions did not affect the
ities, organizational processes, organizational completeness, infor- cost of equity capital, because the concept of reducing environ-
mation, and knowledge, etc. Most variance in company mental impacts through the reduction of carbon emissions remains
performance can be attributed to the distribution of resources and relatively new. Thus, there is a delay in the market’s reaction to
the heterogeneous capabilities of competitors, with industry and such information, and there is a lack of understanding of the pos-
markets playing relatively minor roles (Masakure et al., 2009). The itive environmental impacts of the reduction of carbon emissions.
efficient distribution, utilization, and preservation of resources This leads to the first hypothesis.
offer a way to reduce adverse environmental impacts, whereas eco-
H1. Eco-innovation has a negative effect on the cost of equity
innovation provides firms with opportunities to enhance their
capital.
competitive advantage.
Eco-innovation as a business strategy focuses on increasing Eco-innovation affects company performance (Przychodzen and
corporate profits while improving and preserving the ecology. Eco- Przychodzen, 2015; Brasil et al., 2016). Companies that consider
innovation comprises part of a larger innovation, but it adopts an eco-innovation tend to also address regulation and consumer
environmentally responsible approach to achieving positive and perception concerns (Doran and Ryan, 2012). Companies are
direct economic and environmental results (Albu and Stelea, 2015). increasingly seeking to embrace innovations that bolster their
Pujari et al. (2003) summarized methods in which companies environmentally-friendly credentials to improve their financial
benefit from environmental improvements, such as increased sales, performance by increasing their appeal to and thus demand from,
better consumer responsiveness, better customer proximity, and consumers who care about the environment. Przychodzen and
better corporate reputation. Environmental innovations comprise Przychodzen (2015) added that companies that engaged in eco-
the development of new products, processes, techniques, practices, innovation had higher levels of profitability and were more likely
and systems aiming to avoid adverse environmental impacts (Beise to face lower exposure risks. Research by Brasil et al. (2016) found
and Rennings, 2005). Eco-innovation highlights the behavior of the that each type of eco-innovation was both a determinant of and a
actors of innovation (e.g., innovators and companies) in terms of contributor to business performance. Apart from increased sales,
their pursuit of the dual objectives of ensuring economic perfor- corporate profits can be increased by reducing greenhouse gas
mance while maintaining responsibility for their environment. emissions via reduced production costs (Nishitani et al., 2017). This
Their actions have direct and indirect positive impacts on the leads to the second hypothesis.
environment via the development of ecological improvements
H2. Eco-innovation has a positive effect on the company’s finan-
(Albu and Stelea, 2015; Halila and Rundquist, 2011).
cial performance.
There are several types of eco-innovation. First, organizational
eco-innovation is achieved through the development of training In Indonesia, the environmental regulations of Law no.3, 2014,
and education programs that focus on environmental management art. 30 provide rules for industry players. Industrial companies
and innovative product design. Another type includes organiza- must process and utilize natural resources in an efficient, envi-
tional efforts to reduce social and economic impacts via product ronmentally friendly, and sustainable way. For actors violating
and relationship improvements with stakeholders (Brasil et al., these obligations, para. 5 of the law provides sanctions beginning
2016). Eco-innovation is undertaken by redesigning and devel- with a written warning. The worst case includes the suspension of
oping products that use less energy, reduces waste, and contains the firm’s business license. Via government regulation, it is easily
fewer substances harmful to human health (Brasil et al., 2016). assumed that eco-innovation provides the benefit of helping pro-
Process eco-innovation refers to measures, such as reusing raw- tect the surrounding environment. Unfortunately, it is costly to
materials, recycling for human health, and reducing negative apply continuous innovation, and this is where corporate political
environmental impacts (Brasil et al., 2016). Marketing eco- connections come into play. Li et al. (2018) stated that companies
innovation (Halila and Rundquist, 2011) involves new marketing with political connections benefited from more subsidies than
methods that result in changes to the design or impression of a those with none. A company with connections can be expected to
product in terms of its placement, promotion, or price. Attention is improve innovation, including eco-innovation. Tsai and Xu (2018)
paid to the principle of the environment or the formation of found that companies with strong political connections innovated
ecological awareness as part of the promotion (e.g., an eco-label). more as they received larger government subsidies. In line with
This could take the form of a green brand, used for improved resource-based theory, political connections is one type of com-
commercialization of products or services. pany resource that can provide benefits to companies as regards
Environmental policy in Indonesia addresses the importance of accessing new information about government policy, making
the roles played by industry in the preservation of the natural obtaining investment capital easier, improving tax administration,
environment. Law no. 5, 1984, was revised to Law no.3, 2014. Article and increasing government subsidies for conducting business.
30 lists industry rules, including the obligation to process and Unlike Tsai and Zang, however, Han (2019) found that CEOs with
utilize natural resources efficiently and in environmentally friendly political connections tended to have lower levels of innovation. This
and sustainable ways. For violations, Law no.3, 2014, art. 30, para. 5, is because CEOs with political connections adopted a more flexible
outlines sanctions ranging from written warnings to business- employment policy, which in turn meant that they had a lower
license suspension. level of innovation output from their employees. Since previous
studies present mixed evidence, the present study’s hypothesis is
2.1. Previous research and hypothesis development based on the resource-based theory, that is, political connections
are expected to positively affect eco-innovation. This leads to the
Since previous research on the association between eco- third hypothesis.
innovation and the cost of equity is still scarce, this study’s first
H3. Political connections positively affect eco-innovation.
hypothesis is based on carbon research, a part of environmental
innovation. Kim et al. (2015) found that firms with a lower carbon In developing countries like Indonesia, the government is the
risk had lower equity capital costs because of their reporting re- main driver of economic development. Thus, all government pol-
quirements. As such, the higher a company’s carbon emissions, the icies greatly affect the activities of a firm. Political connections play
greater the cost incurred (e.g., lawsuits). Contradictorily, Li et al.
4 G. Latupeirissa, D. Adhariani / Journal of Cleaner Production 258 (2020) 120579

an important role in these activities, including the reduction of rates of return (Easton, 2004). At the calculation stage, a negative
equity costs. Boubakri et al. (2012) found that firms with political ratio was removed from the study. The negative value was gener-
connections had lower equity capital than unrelated companies ated from the negative earnings per share from four consecutive
because shareholders viewed companies with political connections years and is considered invalid. Valid representations of this ratio
as having a lower risk than companies with none. Furthermore, help lower measurement errors (Witmer and Zorn, 2007) and can
they found that political connections had a stronger effect in terms be used to estimate the highest capital costs better than other
of lowering the cost of equity capital in large and older companies estimation models (Lee, 2006). The cost of equity capital using the
and those located in countries with lower freedoms of the press, PEG ratio is measured using Eq. (1).
weaker democracies, higher corruption, limited stock market sffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffiffi
growth, and a greater probability of economic depression. This EPStþ2  EPStþ1
leads to the fourth hypothesis. CoC ¼ : (1)
P0
H4. Political connections have a negative effect on the cost of
equity capital. where:

Maintaining good relations with the government creates valu- CoC: cost of equity capital
able social capital for businesspersons (Ling et al., 2016). The ease EPStþ2: earnings per share at date t þ 2
with which firms can access information and bureaucratic benefits EPStþ1: earnings per share at date t þ 1
directly impacts their corporate performance. Zhang (2017) argued P0: price per share at current date t ¼ 0
that political connections could provide an opportunity for com-
panies to modify or influence future government policies and Eco-innovation is assessed using content analysis of related in-
regulations in the sense that the company could lobby or bargain formation disclosed by company websites, annual reports, and
with the government. This would affect the company’s perfor- sustainability reports. Previous studies measured eco-innovation
mance as well. For example, via lobbying, a company could secure a using a dummy variable (i.e., 1 for doing eco-innovation, 0 other-
lower tax rate than it would otherwise pay and be able to borrow wise) (Przychodzen and Przychodzen, 2015). This study leverages
funds more easily. This leads to our fifth hypothesis. scoring to measure eco-innovation, for which there are several
H5. Political connections have a positive effect on company types: product, process, organization, and marketing. It is per-
performance formed as follows.

Political relations play an important role in strengthening or - It is given a value of 0 if the company does not have eco-
weakening the relationship of eco-innovation to performance and innovation types.
the cost of equity capital. Lin et al. (2014) provided evidence that - It is given a value of 1 if the company carries out 1 of the 4 types.
political connections had a negative effect on green products and - It is given a value of 2 if the company carries out 2 of the 4 types.
innovation processes. Political connections can negatively affect - It is given a value of 3 if the company carries out 3 of the 4 types.
corporate governance via the inefficient allocation of resources. - It is given a value of 4 if the company carries out all types.
Thus, these connections reduce green-innovation implementation.
In contrast, Zhang (2017) provided evidence that political connec- Company performance, a dependent variable for the second
tions had a positive effect on corporate environmental re- model, is measured using the return on assets (ROA), a measure-
sponsibility. A company’s political connections can provide ment of a company’s financial performance. It is used because it is a
advantages in terms of accessing policy information, funds, tax more holistic performance indicator and measures corporate
advantages, and subsidies. The contribution of political connections profits as a representation of total assets (Lau, 2016). Then, the
will then strengthen the negative and positive impacts of eco- variable is intended to reflect on how profitable companies can
innovation on the cost of equity capital and financial perfor- have better investment opportunities. Following Przychodzen and
mance, respectively. Przychodzen (2015), the ratio is computed as
H6. Political connections strengthen the negative association be-
EBIT
tween eco-innovation and the cost of equity capital. ROA ¼ : (2)
Total Asset
H7. Political connections strengthen the positive association be-
tween eco-innovation and company financial performance. where:

ROA: return on assets


3. Research methodology EBIT: earnings before interest and taxes

This study leverages secondary data using panel regression. Eco- Political connections, an independent and a moderating vari-
innovation data on variables, cost of equity, financial performance, able, can strengthen or weaken the impact of eco-innovation. It is
and political connections are taken from audited annual reports. measured using dummy variables. It receives 1 if commissioners
Eco-innovation data are also gathered from companies’ sustain- and directors of companies get involved with government agencies,
ability reports and official corporate websites. and 0 otherwise. Political connection occurs when commissioners
or directors have been or are currently serving in government
3.1. Operational definition of the primary variables agencies, military posts, or political parties (Zhang, 2017).

The cost of equity capital, a dependent variable in the first 3.2. Research models
model, is measured using the price-earnings growth (PEG) ratio
(Easton, 2004). This ratio combines prices, estimated earnings, and Two research models are used in this study. The first was tested
profit growth, which can be used as the basis for stock recom- using a total of 1,100 observations, comprising 220 firms over a 5-
mendations. It can also implicitly provide a comparison of expected year period of research (2011e2015). The cost of equity capital is
G. Latupeirissa, D. Adhariani / Journal of Cleaner Production 258 (2020) 120579 5

measured using the PEG ratio, which requires a t value þ 2, score from 0 to 4 based on the number of innovation types
requiring the data to be curtailed at 2015 for Model I. The second performed.
model used a total of 1,398 observations, comprising 233 sample Control variables used in the regression are: Lev represents the
companies over a 6-year period of research (2011e2016). The leverage by total debt/TA. Size represents company size, measured
research models are presented below. by the natural logarithm of total assets. CsL is the company’s life
cycle, measured by retained earnings divided by total assets. Neg is
3.2.1. Research Model I negative net income, measured by a dummy. Negative net income
The first model tests Hypotheses 1, 4, and 6, which discuss the is given a value of 1, 0 for positive.
external economic impact of eco-innovation through the com- This study uses ordinary least square (OLS) statistical regression
pany’s cost of capital. A benefit obtained by companies from for data analysis. To test the hypothesis, a regression with balanced
implementing eco-innovation as part of their business strategy is panel data is used for each research model. Before testing the hy-
cost reduction. Kim et al. (2015) found that companies with lower pothesis, all classical assumptions are tested first. Panel data
carbon risks have lower costs of equity capital. The cost of equity is regression was then conducted using the Chow and Hausman tests
the focus of this research, as shareholders have a higher risk to decide whether to use common effect, fixed effect, or random
compared with debt holders arising from fluctuations in share effect.
prices. The first research model was tested using 1100 observations,
consisting of 220 companies and a five-year research period 4. Results
(2011e2015). The research is limited to 2015 because in the
dependent variable, the cost of capital measured by the PEG ratio This study’s sample included companies listed on the IDX that
requires the value of t þ 2, where 2017 is the most current data for met several purposive sampling criteria, as follows. There were
this research. 1,100 observations for the first model and 1,398 observations for
For Hypotheses 1 and 4 the second.Table 1.
Before proceeding to the results of hypothesis testing, the
CoCit ¼ ait þ b1EcInit þ b2HubPolit þ b3levit þ b4Sizeit þ b5CsLit descriptive statistics are presented. As shown in Table 2, for
þ b6Negit þ εit Research Model I, the dependent variable, cost of equity capital,
was measured using the PEG ratio, revealing an average of 9.46
For Hypothesis 6 with a standard deviation of 8.89. The average eco-innovation score
was 0.61, with a standard deviation of 0.80.
CoCit ¼ ait þ b1EcInit þ b2HubPolit þ b3EcIn*HubPolit þ b4levit Table 3 shows the results of the descriptive statistics for Model
II, using financial performance, as measured by ROA. The average
þ b5Sizeit þ b6CsLit þ b7Negit þ εit
ROA was 0.077, with a standard deviation of 0.147. This is low,
reflecting the general financial environment in Indonesia. The
average eco-innovation was 0.63, and its standard deviation was
0.79. Additionally, political connections as an independent variable
3.2.2. Research Model II averaged 0.48. This indicates that 48% of companies from the
The second model tests Hypotheses 2, 3, 5, and 7, related to the sample of 233 had political ties.
company’s internal economic impact of applying eco-innovation. Detailed eco-innovation scores are presented in Table 4. The
Przychodzen and Przychodzen (2015) empirically prove that com- data shows a decreasing trend in the number of companies not
panies implementing eco-innovation demonstrate enhanced per- engaging in eco-innovation initiatives, from 67% in 2011 to 44% in
formance and higher profitability. The total observations for this 2016. Most companies had one type of eco-innovation, mostly via
model are 1398, with 233 company samples and a six-year research product or process. None had all four types.
period (2011e2016).
For Hypothesis 2 and Hypothesis 5
4.1. Results of hypothesis testing
FirPerfit ¼ ait þ b1EcInit þ b2HubPolit þ b3Levit þ b4Sizeit
4.1.1. Research model I
þ b5CsLit þ b6Negit þ εit Table 5 shows the results for Hypotheses 1 and 4. It can be seen
that Hypothesis 1 was not accepted. Thus, eco-innovation was not
For Hypothesis 7
found to affect the cost of equity capital. This could be because, in
FirPerfit ¼ ait þ b1EcInit þ b2HubPolit þ b3EcIn*HubPolit Indonesia, investors are generally not aware of environmental is-
sues. This result differs from Kim et al. (2015), who found that firms’
þ b4Levit þ b5Sizeit þ b6CsLit þ b7Negit þ εit

For Hypothesis 3 Table 1


Research sample.
EcInit ¼ ait þ b1HubPolit þ b2Levit þ b3Sizeit þ b4Negit þ εit
Number of companies listed on the IDX from 2011 to 2016 398
CoC is the cost of equity capital as measured using the PEG ratio Less:
(Easton, 2004). It is the roots of EPS, tþ2-EPS, tþ1, divided by the Delisting companies from 2011 to 2016 (18)
share price of the current year. FirmPerf is the financial performance Incomplete annual reports (93)
measured using the ROA (EBIT/TA) (Przychodzen and Przychodzen, Companies that posted in a mid-year of the research period (75)
Companies with negative EPS for 4 years straight (Model 1) (12)
2015). HubPol represents the political connections measured using
Research sample for Research Model I 220
the dummy variable, 1, for companies with political links, and 0 for Research sample for Research Model II 233
those with none. EcIn is a judged score. Eco-innovation in this Research period (2011e2015 for Research Model I) 5
research comprises several types of product innovation, processes, Research period (2011e2016 for Research Model II) 6
organizations, and marketing. After examining the disclosure of Total Observations for Research Model I 1,100
Total Observations for Research Model II 1,398
eco-innovation activities published by the company, we provided a
6 G. Latupeirissa, D. Adhariani / Journal of Cleaner Production 258 (2020) 120579

Table 2 coefficient of 1.532. This indicates that the stronger a firm’s political
Descriptive Statistics. Model I. connections, the higher its cost of equity capital, which shows that
Mean Median Max Min Std Dev a company’s political connections are viewed as neither strength
CoC 9.4665 7.2459 66.6200 0.1270 8.8933
nor an advantage by investors. Although a company may have
EcIn 0.613 0 3 0 0.800 political connections, it does not lower its cost of equity capital.
HubPol 0.465 0 1 0 0.499 These results differ from those of previous studies, notably that of
Lev 0.254 0.218 4.976 0 0.320 Boubakri et al. (2012), who found that politically connected firms
Size 28.360 28.316 33.134 22.930 1.663
enjoyed lower equity capital costs compared with those with no
CsL 0.118 0.184 9.424 85.65 4.486
Neg 0.105 0 1 0 0.307 such connections.
CoC: cost of equity capital, EcIn: eco-innovation score, HubPol: political connections,
Lev: leverage, Size: company size, CsL: company life cycle, Neg: negative income. 4.1.2. Research model II
Results showed that companies with political connections
innovate more. The stronger the company’s connections, the
Table 3
greater the level of eco-innovation. This could be because com-
Descriptive Statistics. Model II.
panies with political connections have opportunities to obtain
Mean Median Max Min Std Dev more and bigger subsidies. Under Indonesia’s environmental reg-
ROA 0.077 0.0649 3.655 0.509 0.147 ulations, there is a provision requiring firms to manage their waste.
EcIn 0.637 0 4 0 0.797 They are forced to pay high fees for waste management in accor-
HubPol 0.481 0 1 0 0.499 dance with standards. This could be a reason companies with po-
Lev 0.289 0.232 4.976 0 0.417
Size 28.409 28.395 33.198 22.930 1.672
litical connections are more compliant. This finding supports
CsL 0.189 0.155 9.424 85.650 4.268 previous research by Tsai and Xu (2018), who found that companies
Neg 0.203 0 1 0 0.402 with strong political connections innovated more.Table 6.
RoA: return on assets, EcIn: eco-innovation score, HubPol: political connections, From Table 7, Hypothesis 2 was not accepted. It had a probability
Lev: Leverage, Size: company size, CsL: company life cycle, Neg: negative income. of 0.93 at a 10% significance level. This could be due to company
costs increasing to the point where they exceed income, resulting in
eco-innovation having no effect on financial performance. This
Table 4 supports the assertion by Nishitani et al. (2017), who said that
Eco-innovation scores. company environmental concerns were focused more on
- 0 if the company did not have eco-innovation of any kind.
- 1 if the company performed one of the four types of eco-innovation.
improving the environment than financial performance. Hojnik
- 2 if the company performed two of the four types of eco-innovation. and Ruzzier (2016) believed that eco-innovation only yielded
- 3 if the company performed three of the four types of eco-innovation. benefits for the environment by reducing the environmental
- 4 if the company performed all types of eco-innovation. impact of the company. However, it is the company that is obliged
Scores* Year to bear all of the costs. When considering eco-innovation, a com-
pany must have adequate resources and competent management,
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
both of which entail greater expenditure.
0 67% 59% 53% 51% 48% 44% Political connections have a positive effect on company financial
1 23% 27% 32% 32% 34% 38%
2 9% 12% 13% 15% 14% 14%
performance. Thus, Hypothesis 5 was accepted. The stronger the
3 1% 1% 2% 3% 4% 3% company’s political connections, the better its financial perfor-
4 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% mance. This could be caused by better support from political con-
*Note. nections (Zhang, 2017).
The results shown in Table 8 suggest that political connections
moderately strengthen the positive relationship between eco-
Table 5 innovation and the cost of equity capital. The random-effect
Panel Data Regression Results. Hypotheses 1 and 4. H1: Eco-innovation has a model showed a probability of 0.085, less than the alpha of 0.10.
negative effect on the cost of equity capital. H4: Political connections have a
negative effect on the cost of equity capital.
Thus, Hypothesis 6 was rejected because it was expected that po-
litical connections would strengthen the negative association be-
CoC tween eco-innovation and the cost of equity capital. This highlights
Coeff. Prob. the previous findings wherein eco-innovation positively impacted
EcInov 0.08 0.79 the cost of equity capital, meaning that market players were not
HubPol 1.532 0.038 well-informed about a company’s eco-innovation efforts or did not
Lev 2.426 0.101 have enough trust to believe that such an effort would contribute to
Size 0.952 0.025
CsL 0.075 0.436
Neg 0.045 0.935 Table 6
R Square 0.89 Panel Data Regression Results. Hypothesis 3. H3: Political connections positively
CoC: cost of equity capital, EcIn: eco-innovation score, HubPol: political connec- affect eco-innovation.
tions, Lev: leverage, Size: company size, CsL: company life cycle, Neg: negative
Eco-innovation
income.
Coef Prob

HubPol 0.084 0.045


Lev 0.063 0.110
disclosures on reduced carbon risks resulted in lower equity capital Size 0.157 0.000
costs. Neg 0.034 0.167
For Hypothesis 4, Table 5 shows that political connections had a R Square 0.049
positive effect on the cost of equity capital. At the 10% significance HubPol: political connections, Lev: leverage, Size: company size, CsL: company
level, the probability of political connections was 0.038, with a life cycle, Neg: negative income.
G. Latupeirissa, D. Adhariani / Journal of Cleaner Production 258 (2020) 120579 7

Table 7 the application of eco-innovation and the influence of political re-


Panel Data Regression Results. Hypotheses 2 and 5. H2: Eco-innovation has a posi- lationships wielded by the company to moderate influences.
tive effect on the company’s financial performance. H5: Political connections have a
positive effect on company performance.
Although the impact on financial performance has been investi-
gated in prior studies (Cheng et al. (2014); Przychodzen and
ROA Przychodzen (2015); and Ryszko (2016)), the impact on the cost
Coef Prob of equity and the role of political connections have not been widely
EcInov 0.0005 0.9349 investigated. Thus, these are original contributions of this research.
HubPol 0.0392 0.0045 Based on the content analysis of eco-innovation disclosed in the
Lev 0.3534 0.0000 corporate reports and official websites, it was found that there was
Size 0.0473 0.0000
an increasing trend of companies engaged from 2011 to 2016. Most
CsL 0.0040 0.0061
Neg 0.0923 0.0000 performed one type of eco-innovation. This implies that Indonesian
R Square 0.65 companies increased their attention to stakeholders’ interests, as
RoA: return on assets, EcIn: eco-innovation score, HubPol: political connections,
suggested by the stakeholder theory, by engaging in eco-innovation
Lev: leverage, Size: company size, CsL: company life cycle, Neg: negative income. as a specific sustainability initiative. The political connection was
the main variable found to be a significant determinant of eco-
innovation, representing the resources, as suggested by the
Table 8
Panel Data Regression Results. Hypothesis 6. H6: Political connections strengthen resource-based theory, available from the political ties that could
the association between eco-innovation and the cost of equity capital. be utilized to engage in eco-innovation.
The other results of the study demonstrated that a firm’s
CoC
application of eco-innovation did not affect its cost of equity capital
Coef Prob and financial performance. This might be attributed to the situa-
EcInov 0.669 0.141 tions in Indonesia where the environmental regulations are
HubPol 0.004 0.995 focusing more on the management of hazardous waste, making
EcInov * HubPol 0.931 0.085
other matters a minor concern. Additionally, there was limited in-
Lev 0.194 0.883
Size 1.598 0.000 formation in the companies’ voluntary disclosures, which could
CsL 0.036 0.686 have caused investors to miss the signal on environmental
Neg 0.148 0.780 improvement initiatives. Otherwise, in Indonesia, companies may
R Square 0.048
tend to only focus on improving their financial performance
CoC: cost of equity capital, EcIn: eco-innovation score, HubPol: political connections, without prioritizing the environment. This was evident from Model
Lev: leverage, Size: company size, CsL: company life cycle, Neg: negative income. II, where, from 233 companies, only 39% had implemented eco-
innovation, which could be related to the increase in costs borne
by firms compared with profits. Additionally, the government did
Table 9
Panel Data Regression Results. Hypothesis 7. H7: Political connections strengthen
not provide special assistance or incentives at the time.
the association between eco-innovation and company financial performance. This result differs from Kim et al. (2015), who found that com-
panies with a smaller carbon risk had a lower cost of equity capital.
ROA
This might be owing to the existence of mandatory government
Coef Prob regulations that require companies to achieve carbon emission
EcInov 0.002 0.849 reduction targets at a certain level in the countries being studied.
HubPol 0.036 0.033 However, this study only considers Indonesia, where environ-
EcInov * HubPol 0.004 0.734
mental preservation is only a rule; no mandatory requirements for
Lev 0.353 0.000
Size 0.047 0.000 companies to achieve a certain target in the improvement of their
CsL 0.005 0.006 environmental performance by means of eco-innovation exist.
Neg 0.092 0.000 However, this result supports the findings of Li et al. (2014), that is,
R Square 0.65 reducing carbon emissions does not affect the cost of equity capital.
RoA: return on assets, EcIn: eco-innovation score, HubPol: political connections, This is probably because the reduction in carbon emissions is still
Lev: leverage, Size: company size, CsL: company life cycle, Neg: negative income. relatively new and hence the market has not been able to react
sufficiently to environment-related information.
a company’s success regarding sustainability. The results of Table 9 This study also found that political connections positively
show that Hypothesis 7 was also not accepted, meaning that po- affected company financial performance. However, it also increased
litical connections did not affect the relationship between eco- the cost of equity, representing the lack of appreciation from capital
innovation and company financial performance. market players. Politically connected firms could be viewed as
To check the robustness of our results, we performed a sensi- having higher risks because the connections are not seen as a
tivity analysis by using the alternative measurement for the cost of source of corporate strength. The study found that political con-
equity capital and financial performance. Following Hajawiyah nections strengthened the eco-innovation relationships against
et al. (2019), we estimated the cost of equity capital using the equity capital costs, but they did not moderate the influence of eco-
CAPM model and used ROE (return on equity) to measure financial innovation on financial performance. The moderating effect of
performance (Przychodzen and Przychodzen, 2015). The results political connections on the association between eco-innovation
(un-tabulated) were consistent with the main tests, and we still and the cost of equity might hinder the direct positive benefits
could not find any impact of eco-innovation on the cost of equity on eco-innovation when there is no adequate channel to commu-
capital and financial performance in the Indonesia context. nicate the efforts to investors.

5. Discussion 6. Conclusion

This study aimed to determine the external impacts (cost of This study investigated the external and internal impacts of eco-
equity capital) and the internal impacts (financial performance) of innovation on the cost of equity capital and corporate financial
8 G. Latupeirissa, D. Adhariani / Journal of Cleaner Production 258 (2020) 120579

performance, as well as the moderating role of political connections between political connections and the cost of capital and financial
in Indonesia as an emerging market. The findings show that eco- performance.
innovation does not have a significant impact, but political con-
nections do. Political connections are also found to influence eco- Declaration of competing interest
innovation and strengthen its association with the cost of equity
capital. None.
The results of this study bring several implications. First, the
insignificant impact of eco-innovation on the cost of equity implies CRediT authorship contribution statement
that there should be adequate, readable, and understandable dis-
closures on firms’ initiatives so that investors can appreciate the Gracezelda Latupeirissa: Writing - original draft, Conceptuali-
low cost of equity capital. Second, to convey the impact of eco- zation. Desi Adhariani: Writing - review & editing,
innovation on financial performance, the government could Conceptualization.
enhance eco-innovation by providing monetary incentives, such as
additional subsidies for continuous innovation to compensate for
References
the additional costs of eco-innovation, which require adequate in-
vestments in human resource capacity and technology. The results Albu, A., Stelea, S., 2015. Green business development using eco-innovation. Qual.
of this study can be used as the basis for environment-related Access Success 16 (1), 465e472.
regulations by the government. In the absence of monetary in- Aloise, P.G., Macke, J., 2017. Eco-innovations in developing countries: the case of
Manaus free trade zone (Brazil). J. Clean. Prod. 168, 30e38. https://doi.org/
centives, Indonesian companies might also try to implement low- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.212.
cost eco-innovation by conducting benchmarking with companies Barney, J.B., 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J. Manag. 17
that have already applied similar strategies. This will contribute (1), 99e120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108.
Beise, M., Rennings, K., 2005. Lead markets and regulation: a framework for
significantly to the eco-innovation effort, ultimately leading to analyzing the international diffusion of environmental innovations. Ecol. Econ.
cleaner production methods and environmental sustainability. 52 (1), 5e17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.007.
Apart from the practical implications, this research also brings a Bitencourt, C.C., de Oliveira Santini, F., Zanandrea, G., Froehlich, C., Ladeira, W.J.,
2020. Empirical generalizations in eco-innovation: a meta-analytic approach.
theoretical implication that bolsters the interest of academicians to J. Clean. Prod. 245, 1e14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118721, 118721.
conduct more research on the impact of eco-innovation, given the Boubakri, N., Guedhami, O., Mishra, D., Saffar, W., 2012. Political connections and
relative lack of similar studies in Indonesia. We focused on litera- the cost of equity capital. J. Corp. Finance 18 (3), 541e559. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2012.02.005.
ture regarding the association between political connections and
Brasil, M., Abreu, M., SilvaeFilho, J., Leocadio, A., 2016. Relationship between eco-
eco-innovation, considering that political connections is one type innovations and the impact on business performance: an empirical survey
of company-related capital from the resource-based theory research on the Brazilian textile industry. Rev. Adm. 51 (3), 276e287. https://
perspective that articulates the importance of optimally employing doi.org/10.1016/j.rausp.2016.06.003.
Cai, W., Li, G., 2018. The drivers of eco-innovation and its impact on performance:
capital to encourage eco-innovation initiatives in Indonesia. As evidence from China. J. Clean. Prod. 176, 110e118. https://doi.org/10.1016/
stated by Whetten (1989), a legitimate contribution to theory j.jclepro.2017.12.109.
development primarily comes from the explanation of the rela- Cheng, C.C., Yang, C.L., Sheu, C., 2014. The link between eco-innovation and business
performance: a Taiwanese industry context. J. Clean. Prod. 64, 81e90. https://
tionship between variables owing to changes in specific variables doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.050.
(additions or deletions from the research model). By adding the Doran, J., Ryan, G., 2012. Regulation and firm perception, eco-innovation and firm
political connections variable, we extend the literature by showing performance. Eur. J. Innovat. Manag. 15 (4), 421e441. https://doi.org/10.1108/
14601061211272367.
that in the Indonesian context, political connections have a direct Easton, P.D., 2004. PE ratios, PEG ratios, and estimating the implied expected rate of
positive impact on eco-innovation; however, the connections have return on equity capital. Account. Rev. 79 (1), 73e95. https://doi.org/10.2308/
not yet been utilized optimally to provide investors with “trust” in a accr.2004.79.1.73.
El Ghoul, S., Guedhami, O., Kwok, C.C., Mishra, D.R., 2011. Does corporate social
company’s eco-innovation initiatives. This might be owing to the
responsibility affect the cost of capital? J. Bank. Finance 35 (9), 2388e2406.
investors’ difficulties in understanding the company’s disclosures https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2011.02.007.
regarding eco-innovation initiatives, or because the disclosures Faccio, M., 2006. Politically connected firms. Am. Econ. Rev. 96 (1), 369e386.
https://doi.org/10.1257/000282806776157704.
themselves are not adequate to ensure transparency, hence
Fan, J.P., Wong, T.J., Zhang, T., 2007. Politically connected CEOs, corporate gover-
resulting in a higher cost of equity capital. nance, and Post-IPO performance of China’s newly partially privatized firms.
This study has a number of limitations. The small number of J. Financ. Econ. 84 (2), 330e357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2006.03.008.
years is insufficient to describe the overall impact of the imple- Fernando, Y., Wah, W.X., 2017. The impact of eco-innovation drivers on environ-
mental performance: empirical results from the green technology sector in
mentation of eco-innovation on either the cost of equity capital or Malaysia. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 12, 27e43. https://doi.org/10.1016/
company performance. Thus, further research should look to in- j.spc.2017.05.002.
crease the number of years included in the period of study. Addi- Fernando, Y., Shaharudin, M.S., Wahid, N.A., 2016. Eco-innovation practices: a case
study of green furniture manufacturers in Indonesia. Int. J. Serv. Oper. Manag.
tionally, the measurement of financial performance was conducted 23 (1), 43e58.
using only ratios. Hence, it could not capture the full performance Freeman, R.E., 1999. Divergent stakeholder theory. Acad. Manag. Rev. 24 (2),
of the firm. Future research should thus add a measure of company 233e236. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.1893932.
Habib, A., Muhammadi, A.H., Jiang, H., 2017. Political connections, related party
performance, based on both accounting and market size. The transactions, and auditor choice: evidence from Indonesia. J. Contemp. Account.
measurement of eco-innovation was based only on secondary data Econ. 13 (1), 1e19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2017.01.004.
in the form of written information issued by the companies (e.g., Hajawiyah, A., Adhariani, D., Djakman, C., 2019. The sequential effect of CSR and
COE: family ownership moderation. Soc. Responsib. J. 15 (7), 939e954. https://
annual reports and official websites), meaning that the eco- doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-09-2017-0179.
initiative implementation was based only on information the Halila, F., Rundquist, J., 2011. The development and market success of eco-
company chose to provide. Furthermore, it should apply observa- innovations: a comparative study of eco-innovations and “other” innovations
in Sweden. Eur. J. Innovat. Manag. 14 (3), 278e302. https://doi.org/10.1108/
tions and questionnaires focusing on one industry or company. In
14601061111148807.
this study, political relations were looked at holistically. In practice, Han, S., 2019. CEO political preference and corporate innovation. Finance Res. Lett.
however, a company’s political relationships arise from different 28, 370e375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2018.06.006.
agencies. Certain types of extant political relationships in the Hazarika, N., Zhang, X., 2019. Factors that drive and sustain eco-innovation in the
construction industry: the case of Hong Kong. J. Clean. Prod. 238, 117816.
business sector have big impacts. Future research can also inves- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117816.
tigate the moderating role of eco-innovation on the association Hojnik, J., Ruzzier, M., 2016. The driving forces of process eco-innovation and its
G. Latupeirissa, D. Adhariani / Journal of Cleaner Production 258 (2020) 120579 9

impact on performance: insights from Slovenia. J. Clean. Prod. 133, 812e825. financial performanceeevidence from publicly traded companies in Poland and
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.06.002. Hungary. J. Clean. Prod. 90, 253e263. https://doi.org/10.1016/
Jensen, M.C., 2002. Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate j.jclepro.2014.11.034.
objective function. Bus. Ethics Q. 12 (2), 235e256. https://doi.org/10.2307/ Pujari, D., Wright, G., Peattie, K., 2003. Green and competitive: influences on
3857812. environmental new product development performance. J. Bus. Res. 56 (8),
Kim, Y.B., An, H.T., Kim, J.D., 2015. The effect of carbon risk on the cost of equity 657e671. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(01)00310-1.
capital. J. Clean. Prod. 93, 279e287. https://doi.org/10.1016/ Rezaee, Z., 2016. Business sustainability research: a theoretical and integrated
j.jclepro.2015.01.006. perspective. J. Account. Lit. 36, 48e64. https://doi.org/10.1016/
Latan, H., Jabbour, C.J.C., de Sousa Jabbour, A.B.L., Wamba, S.F., Shahbaz, M., 2018. j.acclit.2016.05.003.
Effects of environmental strategy, environmental uncertainty and top man- Ryszko, A., 2016. Proactive environmental strategy, technological eco-innovation,
agement’s commitment on corporate environmental performance: the role of and firm performancedcase of Poland. Sustainability 8 (2), 156. https://
environmental management accounting. J. Clean. Prod. 180, 297e306. https:// doi.org/10.3390/su8020156.
doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.106. Salim, N., Ab Rahman, M.N., Wahab, D.A., 2019. A systematic literature review of
Lau, C.K., 2016. How corporate derivatives use impact firm performance? Pacific- internal capabilities for enhancing eco-innovation performance of
Basin Finance Journal 40, 102e114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2016.10.001. manufacturing firms. J. Clean. Prod. 209, 1445e1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/
Lee, S., 2006. The Comparison of the Predictive Ability of Different Cost of Equity j.jclepro.2018.11.105.
Capital Models for the Lodging Industry. The Pennsylvania State University, Santos, D.F.L., Rezende, M.D.V., Basso, L.F.C., 2019. Eco-innovation and business
Pennsylvania (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). performance in emerging and developed economies. J. Clean. Prod. 237, 117674.
Li, Y., Eddie, I., Liu, J., 2014. Carbon emissions and the cost of capital: Australian https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117674.
evidence. Rev. Account. Finance 13 (4), 400e420. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAF- Sarkar, A.N., 2013. Promoting eco-innovations to leverage sustainable development
08-2012-0074. of eco-industry and green growth. Eur. J. Sustain. Dev. 2 (1), 171e224. https://
Li, X., Luo, J., Chan, K.C., 2018. Political uncertainty and the cost of equity capital. doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2013.v2n1p171.
Finance Res. Lett. 26, 215e222. https://di.org/10.1016/j.frl.2018.01.009. Susilawati, D., Kanowski, P., 2019. Cleaner production in the Indonesian pulp and
Lin, H., Zeng, S.X., Ma, H.Y., Qi, G.Y., Tam, V.W., 2014. Can political capital drive paper sector: improving sustainability and legality compliance in the value
corporate green innovation? Lessons from China. J. Clean. Prod. 64, 63e72. chain. J. Clean. Prod. 248, 119259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119259.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.046. Tsai, L.L., Xu, Y., 2018. Outspoken insiders: political connections and citizen
Ling, L., Zhou, X., Liang, Q., Song, P., Zeng, H., 2016. Political connections, over- participation in authoritarian China. Polit. Behav. 40 (3), 629e657. https://
investments, and firm performance: evidence from Chinese listed real estate doi.org/10.7910/DVN/VXVBNI.
firms. Finance Res. Lett. 18, 328e333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2016.05.009. Whetten, D.A., 1989. What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Acad. Manag. Rev.
Masakure, O., Henson, S., Cranfield, J., 2009. Performance of microenterprises in 14 (4), 490e495. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308371.
Ghana: a resource-based view. J. Small Bus. Enterprise Dev. 16 (3), 466e484. Witmer, J., Zorn, L., 2007. Estimating and Comparing the Implied Cost of Equity for
https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000910977170. Canadian and US Firms. Bank of Canada Working Paper, p. 48, 2007.
Nishitani, K., Jannah, N., Kaneko, S., 2017. Does corporate environmental perfor- Zhang, C., 2017. Political connections and corporate environmental responsibility:
mance enhance financial performance? An empirical study of Indonesian firms. adopting or escaping? Energy Econ. 68, 539e547. https://doi.org/10.1016/
Environ. Dev. 23, 10e21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2017.06.003. j.eneco.2017.10.036.
Przychodzen, J., Przychodzen, W., 2015. Relationships between eco-innovation and

You might also like