Organizational Behavior-BUS 212

Video Based Analysis (Individual Assignment)

10 marks

Submission Guidelines:

 Write your assignment in report form.

 Submission will be accepted via blackboard only.
 To know more about the grading criteria and what is expected of you to get a good grade for this assignment, check &
follow the detailed rubric.

NOTE: Mark deduction criteria would be followed according to the given below rubric column.

Rubric
Language and Style (30%)
Poor (0) Fair (0.25) Good (0.50) Very Good (0.75) Excellent (1)
Student has Student has not Student has partially Student has met Student has
poorly met the supported the met the criteria of the criteria of excellently met
criteria of criteria proper proper organization, proper the criteria of
proper organization, professional writing, organization, proper
Criteria
organization professional logical flow of professional organization,
professional writing, logical analysis and writing, logical professional
writing, logical flow of analysis formatting flow of analysis writing, logical
flow of analysis and formatting and formatting flow of analysis
and formatting and formatting

1. Appropriate formatting rules & Most of the formatting

Only Few formatting rules Only some formatting rules All formatting rules
No formatting applied rules applied. One -Two
Cover Page applied. applied.
aspect missing
applied
 Font type: Times New Roman,
 Size 12,
 Spacing 1.5
 University logo Somewhat structured
 College Name No cover page, No cover page but lacking
Structured cover page with Structured with good flow Well-arranged structured
 Department Name partially flow of information of information details and coherent information
information details coherent sequence of
 Section No details details
information details
 Name of Instructor
 Students name and IDs
Case has 6 or more
Case has 5- 6 grammar, Case has 3-4 grammar, Case has 1-2 grammar, Case is free of grammar,
grammar, sentence,
sentence, spelling and sentence, spelling and sentence, spelling and sentence, spelling and
spelling and
2. Writing mechanics (grammar, punctuation errors.
punctuation errors. punctuation errors. punctuation errors. punctuation errors.
sentence, spelling, punctuation and Partially accurate
fluent vocabulary, formal academic Inappropriate Somewhat appropriate Inadequate vocabulary, with vocabulary, with partially Appropriate fluent
tone. vocabulary, Informal vocabulary, but Informal partially formal academic formal academic tone vocabulary, formal
academic tone. academic tone tone academic tone.

Few sentences are fluent All sentences are fluent,

3. Fluent sentences, clear
transitions, and effective paragraph
structure.
No fluent sentences, Some sentences are fluent, Most sentences are fluent,
but transitions are not clear transitions, and
clear transitions, and transitions are not clear, but clear transitions, and
effective paragraph
clear, and contains
contains effective paragraph effective paragraph
effective paragraph
ineffective paragraph structure.
structure.
structure.
structure structure.
Contents (70%)
Fails Approaches Meets
Exceeds
No Evidence (0) Expectations Expectations Expectations
Expectations (1)
(0.25) (0.50) (0.75)
Student has shown Student has shown Student has shown Student has shown Student has shown
no understanding minimal average understanding considerable thorough
and missing understanding and analysis. understanding and understanding and in
analysis. Key analysis. Communicates the key comprehensive depth analysis.
Criteria ideas/findings are Communicates the key ideas/findings with little analysis. Communicates the
not communicated ideas/findings with no degree of clarification Communicates the key key ideas/findings
clarification and and justification ideas/findings with with high degree of
justification. considerable degree of clarification and
clarification and justification
justification

Executive summary lacks
clarity and has incomplete
Entire sections of the sections (such as the
executive summary are problem section or the
1. Effective executive summary missing or the polling opinion poll). It contains
report is missing and very little detail and does
the executive summary not clearly explain what
lacks detail and not well the problem and the
explained. solutions are.
Executive summary either
has sections which are too
brief or contains paragraphs
that have not been well-
developed. There is a line or
bar graph and a public
opinion section. The
executive summary is
lacking in detail.
Executive summary
contains a very detailed
Problem Section,
History/Background
Executive summary Section, Effects of the
contains the proper Problem, Public Opinion
sections and a line or bar (and a full-page bar or
graph and outlines the line graph),
problem and the solution, Recommendation, and
but does not contain Conclusion. The essay
enough detail. should be extensive and
should clearly identify the
problem and the solution.

2. Clear explanation of key strategic

issues
Shows no
understanding of the Shows little understanding Shows adequate Shows superior
• The problems, scope, and seriousness were of the issues, key
Shows some understanding
knowledge of the issues, knowledge of the issues,
clearly identified in the discussions. issues, key problems, of the issues, key problems,
and the topic’s present problems, and the topic’s key problems, and the key problems, and the
and the topic’s present
situation and strategic present situation and topic’s present situation topic’s present situation
• There was a well-focused diagnosis of strategic issues.
situation and strategic issues.
and strategic issues. and strategic issues.
strategic issues and key problems that issues.
demonstrated a good grasp of the topic related
present situation and strategic issues.
3. Valid arguments & appropriate
analysis of factors with relevant
supportive detail
Critical issues, key
Critical issues, key factors Critical issues, key factors Critical issues, key factors Critical issues, key factors
factors and key
and key problems that and key problems that and key problems that and key problems that
· Logically organized, key points, key problems that supported
supported the scenario supported the scenario supported the scenario supported the Case
arguments, and easily identified key factors the scenario analysis
analysis were /illogically analysis were not clearly analysis were partially Analysis were clearly
were not logically
organized, poorly identified, not logically identified, logically identified, logically
· Critical issues and key problems that organized, identified,
identified, analyzed, and organized, analyzed, and organized, analyzed, and organized, analyzed, and
supported the topic were identified and clearly analyzed, and
supported. supported. supported. supported.
analyzed and supported. supported.

4. Justification of points made using

references, strategies, models &
approaches Comprehensive
. Comprehensive
description of . Comprehensive . Comprehensive
. Comprehensive description description of
consistencies or patterns description of description of
of consistencies or patterns consistencies or patterns
leading to a summary of consistencies or patterns consistencies or patterns
leading to a summary of the leading to a summary of
the problem or situation leading to a summary of leading to a summary of
problem or situation the problem or situation
supported by no the problem or situation the problem or situation
. Comprehensive description of consistencies or supported by 2 evidences. supported by more than 3
evidence. supported by 1 evidence. supported by 3 evidences.
patterns leading to a summary of the problem or evidences.
situation supported by evidence.
No evidence of
supported key points Few supported key points Most supported key points All supported key points
. Key points were supported with a well thought Some supported key points
with a well thought out with a well thought out with a well thought out with a well thought out
out rationale based on applying specific with a well thought out
rationale based on rationale based on rationale based on rationale based on
concepts, models, strategies and approaches rationale based on applying
applying specific applying specific applying specific applying specific
learned in the course. specific concepts, models,
concepts, models, concepts, models, concepts, models, concepts, models,
strategies and approaches
strategies and strategies and approaches strategies and approaches strategies and approaches
learned in the course..
approaches learned in learned in the course. learned in the course. learned in the course.
the course.

5. Logical organization and

presentation
No evidence of main
ideas and logical
Main ideas have logical Main ideas have a logical Main ideas have most Main ideas have a logical
progression of ideas
Main ideas have a logical progression of ideas progression of ideas with progression of ideas with logical progression of progression of ideas with
with well-executed
with well-executed transition sentences poorly-executed transition partially-executed transition ideas with good-executed well-executed transition
transition sentences
sentences sentences transition sentences sentences
6. Conclusions and recommendations
are congruent with strategic analysis

Specific facts necessary Specific facts necessary to Specific facts were not Specific facts were Specific facts were
Specific facts were referred to when necessary to to support the analysis support the analysis and referred when necessary to occasionally referred when referred when necessary
support the analysis and conclusions. and conclusions was not conclusions was not support the analysis and necessary to support the to support the analysis and
provided. provided. conclusions. analysis and conclusions. conclusions.
one -two
No evidence of Few recommendations and Some recommendations Recommendations and
Recommendations and conclusions were recommendations and
recommendations and conclusions were presented and conclusions were conclusions were
presented and supported in a literate and conclusions were
conclusions and and inadequately supported presented and partially presented and supported
effective manner. presented and not
supported in a literate in in a literate and effective supported in a literate and in a literate and effective
supported in a literate and
effective manner. manner. effective manner. manner.
effective manner.

Effective
Effective recommendations or plans of action recommendations or Effective
provided. plans of action not Few effective Some effective recommendations or plans Effective
provided. recommendations or plans recommendations or plans of of action were partially recommendations,
of action not provided. action inadequate. provided. solutions or plans of
action were provided.
APA style is inaccurate; APA style is accurate; re- APA style is accurate; re- APA style is accurate; re- APA style is accurate; re-
non re-findable sources, findable sources, all the findable sources; all the links findable sources; all the findable sources, all the
all the links don’t work links work for only 2 or 3 work for 60-79 % of the links work for 80-95 % of links work for sources.
7. Referencing: Citation (APA) for sources. of the sources. sources. the sources.

Marks Deductions (from total earned marks)

Word Limit More than 2000 Less than 1000 Between 1000-2000
(Minus 1 mark) ( Minus 1 mark ) (No deduction)
2 days late One day late On deadline
Late Submission Penalty
(Minus 2 marks) (Minus 1 mark) (No deduction)
More than 40 % Less than 30% Less than 20% Less than 10 %
Plagiarism
(Fail/10 marks) (Minus 2 marks) (Minus 1 mark) (No deduction)
Total marks deducted