ata Fes) a18@ A5%(20018 10) The Journal of Korean Acupuncture & Moxibustion Society an GRMES 9183 TMT HR BAS) OR) BOR BOE VAY PY BA le AREER B73} { Abstract Clinical Observations of Temporomandibular Disorder Patients used Dong-Qi Acupuncture Treatment Wu-Hao, Wang « Jin-Kang, Lim - Kyu-Beom, Ahn « Hyoung-Seok, Jang - Joon-Shik, Shin Department of Acupuncture & Moxibustion, Hospital of Jaseng Oriental Medicine Objective : The purpose of This study is to analyze influence of functional and clinical improvement effect on temporomandibular disorders of Dong-Qi acupuncture treatment that often be used to temporomandibular disorder patients Methods : We investigated to focus temporomandibular disorders in Jaseng oriental medicine hospital from September 8, 2000 to March 22, 2001. We compared to before and after treatment situation using temporomandibular disease & facial ache dolor pain and malignant function disorders & activation inhibition analysis from one cured Dong-Qi acupuncture treatment of outpatiens-40 examples. Results : These results appeared that Sex distinction occurrence ratio was much more female than male of |: 7. Age distinction occupied the most ratio in 20-30 generation. Jobs was mainly ranked students and companion. In cases treated before visiting our hospital, was mainly ranked our hospital fast dignosis. the distibution interval of solider was mainly followed above 3 years. the distribution interval of treatment was mainly gone within 1 month and above 3 month, frequency of treatment. was examined below $ times, into 6 to 10 times, more than 1] times, respectively. Everything showed a very valuable effect except chewing and dentalgia in decrease of ache dolor pin and linkage pain related to malfunction, There are meaningful effect in Every part on Mal-function improvement. Every contents showed a very excellent effect except activation such as motivation ingestion and recreation in influence of activation “O4 : BH 208-48: Bw 23M HE: BH 250 RUAN : BLE, MBA Bor MAS O35e!A) Ae APB(Tel. 02-3218-2230) E-mail = stomack@hanmail.net 109BAMA 0188) BUMS INGE ASL HEY SE Conclusion: limitation ‘The above results showed a very valuable treatment effect of temporomandibular disorders on Dong-Qi acupuncture treatment. Therefore we are considered the necessity of continuous study and observation applying to other disease as well as temporomandibular disorders. ‘Key words : TMJ Disorders, Dong-Qi acupuncture treatment, Subjective assessment of temp - oromendibular disorders and facial pains, Analysis of temporomandibular disorders and motional LAE oR the tee Pe Bl Age Ss, 4 az 24, Ha FA ae, ded £4) Ad Ten FE $4 SVS Yeh SFT] 4, Bell& ole Po SHAH, tes Ua. ehh Aasgyy, Woes Seat, Hed at ad soe BReae”, Fea BE Anlst Soles F Wel VLA} ola So] EFS ay7] As i983 IF 33-9] 98014] TMI conferences 74]8}4 2} 22 BAF Temporomandibular Disorders# 4 St Re apa’, ops] adele ob] Besa] Fez Wal Be OU PH BEAD, PRE A, Mote 2S), obel-RU7} ABS Bee] Se BH RBES ), Ue StChI-RUE AZ Sa We Se, 9] Sol, ASS), Hea aalleel, UF, + 25 Stade set doe gaya yey? Ss TMDS| Ale As] Fel StS] MTA SUT Gq wey 2d, aq ae, aaa ae $92 THE + om o|go] Az Hoe Heste op7|ectay B+ eh. Re Belo] ARE Ar) AAAlEs BAL 22 Yyoljea, JAE WS oplrjd a Masse ZB Arse ABW] Be Zamele dhe] Se Ble AS Bel, Estaoee Rago] uwg ay, + 7l7} These] ASABE Hold AF AMe] HE saad? PIPAGRRH SE FFAs 3B 7leb Be a go] $ose ARYoe Seat] YoA| 27] WS BEL FAN FS] ME Bt WE AS Hae 2 7 Se aswce Heels, sda A, TM), 82%, 44, PILHSA, RHE CE Wade Ue Fue oF, AENIS F aE ave Agsie] $3] $50] AG 2e, dAS. Haq 44a gl tadagh So] zl Bae Spt alt, oll Aah Salo] HAE FAS Ae} Whales Be ah s Fade let at = ace WA Bee Ae HAG BIE a A714 BRsHE Blo}ch. 1. atayy 2 Oe 1, BR 20008 9@ 8@Fei 20014 3H 229 72) At AVVIA HAE F422 Ae} MaRS= ‘The Joural of Korean Acupuncture & Moxibustion Society Vol 18. No. $. Oct 2001 @ BS S71 Net St 40s Gyo 2 aac. 2. FiRAS Dae ated ste] Be, Awd BE, ala, ul OA ALAS, Et, Hee HE BW tee Ag, ba FS] FWA Bh eyls Bone USAR Ej Sel depo} aspen Hess HS] WS BE FL NSE Sat Beh, (D) deedsehe] at % APl4 teed Ade) ade ava gy AHA WARS olf} o)-FolFos| TEA A ae, SUA UBS, HYG Baas, as4 Baga FY Ws We Hees ARS LF ES AHL>| MRI, ArthroscpeS AWS] SUAE ARAM Ad Bt Besta Beso PH ay] ett. (2) Hed aw F dass oleate wy SeAt 4 SB UAE US 1S YEAS Aarsle] B4 Aa Y UAS ET Be FAA Bh, ls AL, BEAM ALS Astol Bas B7HIAO a, 4 AB] $9 4 OSes ars tel aR Ad ARH ToS wa Y7HweH(Table 1). 2) a ARE. a) aaa BRAT 52 : FIKBY TRABE lS ML | % 1/2189] 2S 8b Sz HE AV at. (2) ena PPAPATA ABA 0.03x40nm2] 184 SE BS AB, 14] 1~23) AV] AM WS RE WY AZ AV) LSHeS Ro} Wd AHS Bal Adee. al F dS Bact QEach sho} oF 10K FAS BH Fig 1), Table 1. Subjective assessment of temporomendibular disorders and facial pains, Analysis of temporomancibular isorders and Analysis of motional limitation |, ee WEB oie SBS FA BI eM OFFA CE ye ose rested ost ea A 20 a > ol e124, tg ase 018C} Prerrery om, 2a ORLA 98) Sie HE OF am Oot BOR OF ae), 3. &, Fmt BOL onan a2 8B apne eee xB utSAME C180 MMM IO BS! NOIRE BO His #e et 212 ct oF et mat ea acy | SS Baar ae Be Ue 34 ees MSU US ee Oo So) we | | de wacl eS | aM CHA] Ret | = ae eu 2 | i ete ae geez | 8 see Banga | ozxasc | goings | SET o% | sees wen ) ay (2) (3) ABO! BCE @ 4 Sal ELOECEE i @ welt 3 2a Ba ae 84 7071 910 i #4 _ ss aay 2 aoe L WW. AERO] SA AY BA NS 1. 1B ABPE wR? 1) sisack. 2) zt susie 3) 8 Bieich. 4) cf sala 2. BH Mwo] gIeiL487 1) gic, 2) aster 2 BEOHL SIGICHE OL EIS] OFT teh BA! HILICL 3. AO] SUSIE SIMA Ofe! ER ASHHLIR? 4) Je mua, 2) SRO HS FelsIO ISEICY 3) Efe HOH CHIC 4, ON SDE Te SASS, Uw See, Uwe Ol Azi7 UC, FH B)ol LES? neice. eich 5. 64 Awol cle I Ase OBL 1) & SAi7t Sia} 2 AWOL Sa} XIzI01 ch 2) Wat BHO IAI AIBO! Ach 9) OF DEABH WAMEBO! A12I0) Bch mz‘The Journal of Korean Acupuncture & Moxibustion Society Vol. 18. No. $. Oct. 200 Fig 1. Dong-Ci acupuncture treatment Method 3. SAA SAAZE SPSS program] paired T-test& oleate} oak adie] Fea Se Fl eile, B Fat GE Asp} FE Aseston, p<0.0591 8S F290] YE AOE ssict I. B34 Bt EIA 1, 88, 83 YAMA EZ BARES PAvh Sal, lib 354 Ab 12.5%, 87.5%1929 B49 wee 1722 4 A eA VERA, ABS EXE 20cH7} 19a, 30cH7} 10a=z 7 % BRO, A 4SLSE 10dH7} 7a, 404 o] Ae] dale] Oe YEbtet. AMA BES OY, Spe, FH PA, 71S 22 ro) BAe Ast By BW Hatao] Az 122 60%)2 7 Bee, HH 1a (27.5%), Fle] 3al(7.5%), 71EE AZ Lele 5%) 9] E22 YET. Aad oe AVG BES dowd BAS Ba, ayAtalo] Zz} 2al(S 80%), Flo) 1a (20%)2 YEO, gE FH} Lal) (31.4%), BB SA}Ae] 10M (A 28.6%)E & A Yeh oe, FA} Bt lel} 22h 2a (2h 5.7%) | BES Uebach(Table 2) 2. UBS AE AS uaa Az aS Aza Ee 220] 2224 (S5H)2 7 BO, 1 Hels BAD Aa Rasy] A]B7} 162 (40%), HE ion of Sex, Age and Occupation Male Female ‘ae 10-19 2140.0) 5(14.3) 20 ~ 29 2140.0) 17148.) 30 ~ 98 010.0) 10(28.6) 40 ~ 1120.0) 308.6) Total 5(100.0) 35(100.0) ‘Occupation ‘Student 2140.0) 10(28.6) Work jab 2140.0) 10(28.6) House wife 0(0.0) 1101.4) None 1120.0) 26.7) Others 010.0) 215.7) Total 5(100.0), 35(100.0) 113AMES 0180! MINN AOUH KS! AH RE aoa st dejdlo}] 2a(6%)9 E2= Uebsct (Table 3). i. faa Table 3. Previgus Treatment eo First visit 2 cy Hospital and Dentist 16 0 Other Oriental medicine 2 5 Total 4” 100 3. S72 EE WARE 3d0l4o] 232 (57.57%)Z 7 HH, GAIB~3a>] zo] 9aH(22.5%), 67 e1et ©} 82(20%)2 YebktH Table 4). Table 4. Duration of Disease Sex Male Female No. of No.of subjact(%) __subject(%) 6 months > 010.0) 8122.9) 6 months ~ 3 years 1120.0) 8(22.9) < 3 yeas 4(80.0) 1964.3) Total 5(100.0) —_36(100.0), 4. ABA UMASS EE ARNE VAD VB 37M 1-0) 22h 15a (2 37.5%), 2~371Mo] 10a(25%)= Het sta, Phe] Role 2~37AD Y 37H fo] Az 2a (ZA 40%), LaNa op i7} 121(20%), of of LOE 17a lit 1484(40%), 371 Bolt ©] 1324(37.1%), 2~371Be] 82I(22.9%) 21 2 2 debt. ABATE 5solsy} 152(37.5%), 6~ 1087+ 149(35%), 118) ole] 118127.5%)9] 22 YERLD, Wak} loyq= 6~108) Bl 118) ot us * 2] 22} 2al(Z} 40%), 58] ola}7t 1a1(20%), 94 AA WME S8lo}Bi7t 1424 (40%), 6~108]7 1284 (34.3%), 113] 9]4fo] 984(25.7%)2] 22 UebETH(Table 5) Table 5. Sex, Treatment Period and Numbers Sex Male No. of subject(%) Period = 1 month 1(20.0) 1440.01 1 ~ 2 months 2(40.0) (22.9) 3 months ~ 2140.0) 13(97.1) Total 5(100.0) 35(100.0) Numbers ~5 1(20.0) 14140.0) 6-10 2(40.0) 12(34.3) nH 2(40.0) 9125.7) Total 5(100.0) 35(100.0) 5. SES Ast BW OH SSO] FAY BI S7aN ARAe dee ag wl del SE Fa4 Qe deed de aq ea a, 7b] IS 4, ol Meld Wl SS, ABE, Aas S B BPE ARF FARPOO1, PK0.05, P<0.01, P<0.01, P<0.01, P stancard deviation Table 7. Anasis of Temporomandibulr Disses Pre-Treainant Post-Treatnont 7 (seo. #80) (score=80) Basa 2.8000%1,0008 2.205030 6519 3601 O01 oR S.0760+1.4744 ———3.805071.0836 3.40 oo oa eae 27500%1.1712 ——2.0500-0.84858 3.894 oo oc ae 1,37600.8066 1.0780: 0.2667 2628 £0.05 1) Statistical signitcance test was done by paved Ties t: Test statistic. P: P ~ vale $0 standare devation Table 8, Anaysts of Motional Limitation Pre-Tieainent__Post=Treatiert 5 (score:t $0) score 80) ‘ P FEN 7-10000.3789 _1-050020.16 1438 NS age ae 1.926020.8286 ——_*1,62500.6875 2.504 0.08 weaned 1.7500207763 ——_1.40000.4961 3.009 oi sonal 1.487220,7566 ———1,20080.4846 2919 oi BANRaet 1.425020.6360 —_1.175040.4485 2.687 0.05 ayaa 11750404465 ———_1.0500+0.2207 2.260 008 caste 1.4500+0.6985 ——_‘1.2000+0.4061 3.204 01 NAIL 1.2500+0.5883 1 100009038 1.984 NS SEN 1.276020.5681 1.100+0.3038 2479 0.05 Bazeude 1ssootoedse ——_1.277520.4522 2.905 ) A7) VAs AES TIt BSel Ye BF HE AR SE B+ Ue algdeld. avace Ha a B Sle Ul ZH] +4, olde] Ais SH FH deat Fo] Sop We Seo] Fz] S of Se] Ach. o] SBE lt Mo] BA S| ZOE Va 2H0] FS SSsfeal, ola tes o] AEEE DAS Wa 87] Aa} FSS Gol WA BS B4e] 24a She SFE EH | B7).axlo}ch, SNMIS Ws] 7leolale awe 8 A) ey 7} S Able tee S4del lt. BS a AS Ade AE F 7H] BLE Zo] alto] 4 Saas ale # Assos Sao 2h & Fs224 ARaae Yea. S718We eas, FrjAa, TM, Ves, 4a, Pave, HUE BS D dda de Sat 2S, ABBE SE ave Ass) 38] $50] Ve QE, Aa, Yay Ase Bosh $2] AR Be Aapt et. ol BS SMS Vso] tee Aeohol USsH: Ud RAAT 58 S02 so} Ha a ave 40a) HS ARAHE Bat a 3 Pa] BEAMS wayh Sal, olayt sale Aga We L722 a7} ges, Al GE EXE 20d7t 199, 3007} 10922 20~ 20th} AAAS] 72.5%H Also] Be Sah of do] REGS GE T7} oleh AME ty Wf Sbde] 42} 12e($ 60%)= 7H BOM, FH 11A(27.5%), Fale] 32(7.5%), 71EVY zt LAS 5%) ELS VEbt Veo) HE Ada BES dyad Pele Ba, Hbde] 7AAG 1S 2) UE OE BHO! ME BIR At 2a(F 80%), AINE FHF AGL, 4%), HYD Saree} 10a (Zt 28.6%) sal ebdtch. oat steed age] say ate A would B74 FE Basgiow, ae Gh BA, AF Bd Pep} chr] ajol7} she + oe de aa UP aaa FAS SAE oA Baz, ul Ale S tbe] SB 2b Bz go Aa at FF 1l0GE WIS F STINE ARS Dopok Y Meee Zo] aeaia dao, Pulinger $2] wate ae tee Ah] SIS Bole Bt7t Bas] 39%ZM FSO] 14%, 7S Ol] 35%eT HR 2, Gazit" $2 56.4%, Grosteld” $2 67%21 2 Fe4, 2 He] Ato 15~58%9) WES BU Ho}. ER Pousene AS AIF Pao] BABS] PAH, 1/29NF7t lo) HS ada aac. uaa az asl wo ¥azAle] 222 (95%)2 7H Beto, 2 gos SHA 4M BL A}3}2}81) of} 2] 2]B 7b 162(40%), HE weoya DP Gide] 26a) e2e Yeht we Hh} VFol Noi EB ase) de Ws7t Bee @ 77 Ve. BANE REE Feolfo] 232H(67.5 7%)2 THE BT, 67D~Bevizol 92H (22. 5%), 67H IR] Bal (20%) 2] colton, Yu BF seolge] Bayh waht. AR DRS EES Be a7] Vi ool Bt 37h o1-go] Az 15a (At 37.5%), 2~37M°] 102 (25%) 2 ERK, Sto} Bol] = 2~3HM BY 3M lo] 2b Zaz 40%), eatel Solve LAR uit 1481(40%), 3718 ole] 1321(37.1%), 2~37Hgo} 8ah(22.9%) 9] E2e Yet ABRFE Salolét 15a (37.5%), 6~103}7} 1429(35%), 118] 14°] 11 — AC75%) 9 E22 Yet, wl UIE 6~108) B 118}9}4t0) 212} 2al(2 40%), 58] lett 1al(20%), ote} Shoe 58lo1 87h 14 (40%), 6~108)7} 1221(34.3%), 118] 9}4G0] 9aN(25.7%) 2] 22 Yebste, cee Aol SS Be FA SS AT Ee Ad weaes Erde, 84 dy AFA FA SH ths, He] Saas] wa Sis. 49 wield, rat Se 2 FW He) ole SSS HFSS MIE BAF a 24a Baldveldsd gageld7t soy U aeeeaey Velo] rela GW Ye) FZ A] aaa a Bes} S2 Sestepeselay yeh Aa GE Bs, FER ash, olte7], FBIGH, UW] Bs Fe ets 7b aa 25 oa Bol) 7 Le Soe Yo) wl BA(11~59%), G2] MHE4~21%), FET~ 30%) 2 Hea UAE PS O~44%) 22 YEE WHE sls, ME HHea ER she So] Fol, BETS, BES} HAS AzHlel oy a 4, BVA, Azo, Algal MHS SE zai, $8] 7, Sel, Fela] EE] WAY Sho] Qeace LAS Sate BH NST asic, dea As gw de $F2] FAA B87} ol S7la AR AF HD WS qe FF BQ Ass Aqstsr YS aq Ba oA, 7) 3h 24, el dle FSS, ahs, ASF SUSE F LE He #9 Ne $F AE BGOo, ds By e4Me Bas, ad At, Bo] Bee HB, APTd BFA HI8 WE MA Bayh ssich Meat Bol Ae FS4 Ba, FA Ve BES Alsae BE S54] F914 Le 7 BS welch. BAY ARF) Bho] ABa Be AE oie lege] Ha} asics sa 1982 + k ae ces. ‘The Jour of Korean Acupuncture & Moxibustion Society Vol 18. No. $. Oct 2001 % WMAovl sye Aa Ysicta sets, Saga Ho] UMS BEAMS ye] Rsic-a seta ISB Maa sect ago] Was ob et BS Be ALIS 1390] Se Z}go] ag AMP BE Hl HES TUS] He 2 GE BE eae ct sac. a aA Ala Bea Stel Neue AEA F 403 F 3590] Fo] sa 582 gn Hee . Sho} ghee AEd ae Ag IVs 183°] 2 EA7t 47] tu Be AH 2170} AAD ARO, TBS UHgee efzte} As o} skehz ehsatt. oye] Atl BAS gy S7iael sea As Ago lle SRE AUWALE Fash BA} Ae aes ERT FF SITS Heals SM] Blo] Yoo. ep otea BH WA oe} HE Delo] Asstoy aaa AFA BR] Aeaele-s shzech, V.a€ 20008 9% 82 FE 20018 3B 22a 77) ARP GAT aso] Sed Bohs] Waa & Ho} EM 4099 Be aoe so} F71 gag jee # Woe zee aa est Be AEs UA. 1 Pea WEE BA 125%, zt 87.5%, “a HE b 722 ay} Beto, aaa we = 20 47.5%, 300) 25% 20~30dI7t 7 po Bee Ap lesich. 2, AMAZE Ay gl sable] 60% 74 B Hom, FH, FA, lee] E2e yebeeh 3, Uda ARS WS BH7t 45%e Bola B alzsial, eyglae] so] Bon ea ad o] 55%2 7 Bete}. 4, S878 BEE suelo] 57.5%% 7t ESS, 67T~SU |e, 7A Mee] E2e yep sith, 5. ABZ ¥BE VM BW 37t@ o}-zo} 10%2 7 Boe, ARRFE S8|olspt 37.5%, 6~108|7} 35%, 118) le] 27.5% e222 Uett, 6. Mis Hee SE 2 ABs] A244 AS AD ASS an LE Wl HIE Ase 2gich 7. Ws WANS BE HA HE Aa Ept Ws. BS PAE BAS FE4 Aa D2 #4} Ue VSS Adar ZE BS | $918 ole WAL ESHE wich, 8 Rea AREY BE Zab] Set B ASS 87.5694 AR AV THAD, VA gaa Soo] Ue 2 BEd det Aza S we 3599] MSS 514K BeAr A) 2x VE BHO Aa] ago] ges sisted olde] AHR Zo} pea Bes} @ S719N9 ARRE WF FFs Yet ROM, GE pedal Bet ohlet Ge ase Agee] ASA APS} Bato] Aaateley Ab zac. n910. Bz. OLS tY AM mE AI Vi. JzEd Bell, W.. Classification of TM Disorder in ‘The President's Conference on the Ex~ amination, Diagnosis and Management of ‘Temporomandibular Disorders. American Dental Association, 1983:24-29 Bed. Hwa sgn] Az. debate} APMSIA]. 1985; 23(7): 561-8. . ASY, SP, Hale] FS BS AF. FESS AA], 8(1): 86-92 . Hansson T. Temporomandibular joint ¢- hanges related to dental occlusion, Ch - icago Quintessence. 1980'129~30. AST, YHasHs] aler| Ay weap &. cease} si2), 1991906): 420- 22, B74 AY 1, Seer sosats] WEAA) BA Suse Be aes, deare FRNA. 1995;6(2):116-124 Anders Johansson, et al. Acupuncture in treatment of facial musculer pain, ACTA ODONTOL SCAND. 1991;49:153-158 Thomas List and Martti Helkimo. Acu~ puncture and occlusal therapy in the treatment of craniomandibular disorders. ACTA ODONTOL SCAND. 1992;50:37 5-85, add, Waa, AUs, ae 27] ARS] Ba. 2000:38 (6). teal Beh, ua as ate} hata ape] APS OFF, 1997;268:15 ~18. iL 12, 13, 14, 16. 1. 18, 19, 20, 21 22. . BBA. tr Dolwick MP, Riggs RR. Diagnosis and treatment of internal derangements of temporomandibular joint. Dent Clin North AM, 1983:27:561-572 AB. GWA (Temporomandibular Disorders) @?, Heta]>}2]4b48]], 1991; 264: 342-347, ROE MATAR. AS AGL 19 84114 Ada. teases] 7144) Al Ae ABA, 1992:274:190-200. orate ( MIE) HG. HR. 19 86:145:51-53, Gray, Davies and Quayle. A clinical ap ~ proach to temporomandibular disorders. British Dental Jounal. 1994iJune 11 429-35, June 25:473~77, July 23:63 8, August 6:101-6, August 20:13 5-42, September 10:171-8, 48s, 239A, AAU, 71448 A. eva Bes} BY. DEAE 1991, Sidney, L. Bronstein. Diagnostic and O- perative Arthroscopy: Historical Persp - ectives and Indications, Oral and Ma- xillofical Surgery Clinics of North Am- erica, 1989:1:59-68. Dolwick, M. F., Sanders, B TMJ In- ternal Derangement & Arthrosis; Su~ rgical Atlas, Mosby. 1985. Sak BRM. UA SRPELNRRL, 198 2:2312-3, SRS AATERSAES. RBA BA @rmPaME, 1995:97. HE, BER. RAMS SRORE ; Deeg cheala} LA} a1The Jounal of Korean Acupunstwe & Moxibuston Society Vol 18. No. S. Oot. 2001 23. 24. 25. 26, 21. 28. JGR: RARER, 1991°1585. Okeson JP. Management of tempor ~ omandibular disorders and occlusion. 3rd ed. St Louise. CV Mosby 199 3:143-50. ASF A 4. Hea Bohs) At BAB (ap, waealste) Aas). 1991;29(6):4 19-40, James R, Fricton. Developing Outcomes for Temporomandibular Disorders: How successful are we ?, Hey 7Ha}e}sohet 3) 29-4,1995:4-7. Pullinger AG, Seligman DA, Solberg WK. Temporomandibular disorders. Part 1: Functional status, dentomorphologic fe ~ atures, and sex difference in @ nonp- atient population. J Prostho Dent. 198 8;59(2):228-35. Gazit E, Lieberman M, Eini R et al, Prevalence of mandibular dysfunction in 10-18 year old Israeli schoolchidren. J Oral Rehabil. 1984:11: 307-17. Grosfeld O, Jackowska M, Czarrnecka B. 29, 30. 31 32. 33, 34, Results of epidemiological examinations of the temporomandibular joint in ad - olescents and young adults. J Oral Rehabil. 1985; 12: 95-106. SF. He ether SE 7s BAS). HAHAHA). 1983:21 (3): 189-94, Paesani D, Westesson PL, Hatala MP, et al. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis for TMI internal derangement and arthrosis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 19 92:73:360-3. Rebort D, Schenck J, Joseph P, et al Temporomandibular joint:magnetic res ~ onance imaging, Radiology. 1985;156: 829-30. 25%, HH SS WF aa SES Baad Bite dd weed A 1341.1993:311~26. BAA, HER. Sraettenel AA. AE ARBSWAL 1994:15-23. 8s, Seabees] ads ale. AE ARSW}. 1996:4-7, 13. 11