Clinical Nutrition (2008) 27, 557e564

available at www.sciencedirect.com

http://intl.elsevierhealth.com/journals/clnu

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Muscle atrophy, inflammation and clinical outcome

in incident and prevalent dialysis patients
Juan Jesús Carrero a,*,c, Michal Chmielewski a,b,c, Jonas Axelsson a,
Sunna Snaedal a, Olof Heimbürger a, Peter Bárány a,
Mohamed E. Suliman a, Bengt Lindholm a, Peter Stenvinkel a,
Abdul Rashid Qureshi a

a
Divisions of Renal Medicine and Baxter Novum, Department of Clinical Science,
Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
b
Department of Nephrology, Transplantology and Internal Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdansk, Poland

Received 22 February 2008; accepted 17 April 2008

KEYWORDS Summary
Muscle atrophy; Background & aims: Muscle wasting is considered the best marker of protein-energy wasting in
Inflammation; end-stage renal disease (ESRD). We tested the usefulness of a simple observer subjective muscle
Dialysis; atrophy (MA) grading in relation to morbidity and mortality in ESRD patients.
Mortality; Methods: In two different ESRD cohorts (265 incident patients starting dialysis and 221 prevalent
Sex hemodialysis patients), each patient’s degree of MA was visually graded by a trained nurse on
a scale from 1 to 4 as part of the subjective global assessment. This score was confronted with
inflammatory and nutritional indexes as well as objective measurements of muscle atrophy. Pa-
tients were then prospectively followed for up to four or six years, depending on the cohort.
Results: Thirty percent of the incident and 39% of the prevalent patients presented signs of MA.
Across worsening MA scale, nutritional and anthropometric markers of muscle loss were incre-
mentally poorer. Inflammation markers as well as the proportion of women became progres-
sively higher. Female sex, presence of cardiovascular disease, inflammation and low insulin-
like growth factor-1 levels were associated with increased significant odd ratios of MA in each
cohort. After adjustment for age, sex, inflammation, diabetes, cardiovascular disease,

Abbreviations: ESRD, end-stage renal disease; PEW, protein-energy wasting; MA, muscle atrophy; CKD, chronic kidney disease; SGA,
subjective global assessment; HD, hemodialysis; GFR, glomerular filtration rate; CRP, C-reactive protein; IL-6, interleukin-6; IGF-1, insulin
growth factor like-1; LBMI, lean body mass index; MAMC, midarm muscle circumference.
* Corresponding author. Division of Renal Medicine, K56, Karolinska University Hospital at Huddinge, 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden. Tel.: þ46
6693406
E-mail address: juan.jesus.carrero@ki.se (J.J. Carrero).
c
Both authors contributed equally to this work.

0261-5614/$ - see front matter ª 2008 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2008.04.007
558 J.J. Carrero et al.

glomerular filtration rate and/or time on hemodialysis, the hazard ratio of death for moderate/
severe MA was 2.62 (95% CI: 1.34, 5.13; p Z 0.001) and 3.04 (95% CI: 1.61, 5.71; p Z 0.0001) in
the incident and prevalent cohorts respectively.
Conclusion: Increased MA is more common in female dialysis patients and associated with in-
flammation, poor nutritional and anthropometric status, as well as a 3-fold increased 4e6 year
mortality. Our data support the use of frequent MA and/or nutritional assessments in the clinical
practice.
ª 2008 Elsevier Ltd and European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism. All rights
reserved.

Introduction 1994e2005. Patients younger than 18 and older than

Protein-energy wasting (PEW) is the term proposed1 to de-
scribe the state of decreased body stores of protein and en-
ergy fuels (body protein and fat masses) in chronic kidney
disease (CKD). PEW is present in 18e75% of CKD patients.2,3
Muscle wasting is considered one of the most valid markers
of PEW in CKD,4e6 especially because of the limitations of
assessing changes in body weight in patients with impaired
salt and water regulation. Catabolic factors that accelerate
muscle wasting in this patient population are numerous and
include acidosis, comorbid illnesses, corticosteroid use, he-
modialysis (HD) treatment, and sedentary lifestyle.1,7,8 In-
deed, the severity of muscle wasting increases as kidney
function worsens (independently of age and main comorbi-
dites),9 directly contributing to asthenia and to the reduc-
tion in physical activity and quality of life.10
The development of muscle wasting may also be a result
of chronic low-grade inflammation,6 linked to protein
breakdown.11 As recent investigations documented a power-
ful association between muscle wasting and mortality in pa-
tients with CKD,12,13 even in the presence of overweight,14
early detection may allow the implementation of appropri-
ate therapeutic measures. However, there are currently no
clinically useful, uniform and reproducible measures for as-
sessing the presence of accelerated muscle protein catabo-
lism.15 The objective of the present study was thus to study
determinants of muscle wasting in a dialysis population and
to assess whether using a simple subjective visual evalua-
tion of muscle atrophy (done as a part of the subjective
global assessment (SGA) questionnaire) could be used to
predict outcome in two large CKD populations.
Methods
Patients
70 years, with HIV, hepatitis B and signs of acute infection
or unwilling to participate were excluded. The causes of
kidney disease were diabetic nephropathy (31%), chronic
glomerulonephritis (27%), polycystic kidney disease (11%)
and other or unknown causes (31%). Clinical history of dia-
betes mellitus or CVD (obtained from the patient’s medical
records) was documented in 30% and 36% of the patients,
respectively. CVD was defined by clinical history or signs
of ischemic cardiac disease, and/or presence of peripheral
vascular disease and/or cerebrovascular disease. The pa-
tients were followed up for up to 5 years from inclusion in
the study. Follow-up was censored on transplantation and
no patient was lost to follow-up. Although the original ma-
terial consisted of 330 patients, 65 patients refused or
could not attend the nutritional evaluation visits.
The second cohort17 consisted of 221 prevalent HD pa-
tients (126 (57%) men, median age 66 [IQR 51e74] years)
from the Karolinska University Hospital at Huddinge, Stock-
holm (including four satellite dialysis units), Danderyds Hos-
pital and Uppsala Academic Hospital. Patients were
enrolled from October 2003 through March 2004. The only
exclusion criteria were patients with HIV, hepatitis B or un-
willingness to participate. The causes of kidney disease
were diabetic nephropathy (17%), chronic glomerulonephri-
tis (18%), polycystic kidney disease (12%), nephrosclerosis
(15%) and other or unknown causes (38%). Clinical history
of DM or CVD (obtained from the patient’s medical records)
was documented in 24.9% and 64.3% of the patients, re-
spectively. CVD was defined by clinical history or signs of is-
chemic cardiac disease, and/or presence of peripheral
vascular disease and/or cerebrovascular disease. The pa-
tients were followed-up for up to 4 years from inclusion in
the study. Follow-up was censored on transplantation and
no patient was lost to follow-up. Although the original ma-
terial consisted of 228 patients, 7 patients refused or could
not attend the nutritional evaluation visits.

The current study was performed in two different cohorts
of CKD-5 patients (the MIA and MIMICK cohorts) according to
protocols that have been described in detail elsewhere.16,17
The Ethics Committee of the Karolinska University Hospital
in Huddinge, Stockholm, approved both study protocols,
and informed consent was obtained from all patients.
The first cohort16 consisted of 265 CKD-5 incident pa-
tients (162 (61%) men, median age 55 [inter quartile range
44e64] years) from the Karolinska University Hospital at
Huddinge, Stockholm, who were investigated close to
the start of renal replacement therapy (median  SD glo-
merular filtration rate [GFR] 6.4  2.3 ml/min) during
Anthropometric evaluation
Body mass index (BMI) was defined as the weight in
kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters.
Body composition was assessed in both cohorts by using the
four skinfold thicknesses (biceps, triceps, subscapular, and
suprailiac), measured with a conventional skinfold caliper
(Cambridge Scientific Instruments, Cambridge, MA). Lean
body mass (LBM) and fat body mass were estimated by
means of dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (in the pre-
dialysis cohort) using the DPX-L device (Lunar Corp, Madison,
WI) or according to a theoretical formula (in the HD cohort)
Muscle atrophy and outcome in dialysis
based on skinfold thicknesses and body density.18 Lean
body mass index (LBMI) was defined as the total lean body
mass in kilograms divided by the square of the height in
meters.19 Midarm circumference (MAC) was measured
with a plastic tape measurer and was normalized with
measurements from healthy subjects; midarm muscle cir-
cumference (MAMC) was calculated by using the following
formula: MAMC Z MAC  (3.1416  triceps skinfold thick-
ness/10).18 Handgrip strength was measured using a Harpen-
den Handgrip Dynamometer (Yamar, Jackson, MI) in the
dominant hand (in the incident dialytic cohort) or in the
hand without fistula (in the HD group) and normalized
with measurements from healthy subjects (see below).
These assessments were completed either at the time of
or within 1 week of blood sample collection and after the
HD session in the prevalent cohort.
Nutritional status and muscle atrophy (MA)
assessment
Estimation of muscle atrophy is a part of the SGA question-
naire.20 This questionnaire includes six different compo-
nents: three subjective assessments that are performed
by the patients and that concern the patient’s history of
weight loss, incidence of anorexia, and incidence of vomit-
ing, and three objective assessments that are performed by
the evaluators and that are based on the presence of mus-
cle atrophy (MA), the presence of edema and the loss of
subcutaneous fat. The grading of MA was assessed by a spe-
cially trained nurse examining the temporalis muscle, the
prominence of the clavicles, the contour of the shoulders
(rounded indicates well-nourished; squared indicates mal-
nutrition), visibility of the scapula, the visibility of the
ribs, and interosseous muscle mass between the thumb
and forefinger, and the quadriceps muscle mass. The signs
of MA were scored as follows: 1, no signs of MA; 2, mild signs
of MA; 3, moderate signs of MA; 4, severe signs of MA. This
assessment was completed either at the time of or within
1 week of blood sample collection.
Healthy subjects were recruited among the hospital
staff. These individuals underwent a similar protocol as
above described. Anthropometric and handgrip values were
used for normalization of the patient’s data. Individuals
younger than 18 and older than 70 years, or presenting with
clinically manifest disease were not included. A total of 44
healthy volunteers (24 men and 20 women, median age 44
[21e64] years) were recruited. None of these individuals
presented a history of CVD or diabetes. Also, none of these
individuals presented signs of malnutrition (SGA > 1), MA or
inflammation (C-reactive protein > 10 mg/l) at the time of
evaluation.
Laboratory analysis
Blood samples were collected after an overnight fast in the
pre-dialysis cohort and before the dialysis session in the HD
cohort (morning or afternoon rounds). Plasma samples were
kept frozen at 70  C if not analyzed immediately. Glomer-
ular filtration rate (GFR) in the pre-dialysis cohort was esti-
mated as the mean of urea and creatinine clearances. In
both cohorts, routine determinations of creatinine, serum
559
albumin (bromcresol purple) and high-sensitivity C-reactive
protein (CRP) (nephelometry) were performed by routine
procedures at the Department of Clinical Chemistry,
Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge. In both patient
materials plasma interleukin-6 (IL-6) and insulin growth
factor like-1 (IGF-1) concentrations were measured using
commercial kits available for an Immulite Automatic Ana-
lyzer (Diagnostic Products Corporation, Los Angeles, CA).
Statistical analysis
Variables were expressed as means  SD or median (inter-
quartile range), as appropriate. Differences among the
muscle atrophy groups were analyzed with the Kruskale
Wallis analysis of variance followed by a post hoc Dunn’s
test for non-parametric comparisons when assessing differ-
ences in inflammation markers. A c2 test was used for cat-
egorical variables. A multinomial logistic regression model
was used to assess the predictors for muscle atrophy; this
model included the variables significantly associated with
muscle atrophy in univariate analysis or other variables
with a documented causal relationship (in this case age
and diabetes mellitus). Survival analyses used the Ka-
planeMeier survival curve and the Cox proportional hazards
model. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to
examine survival differences after the analysis had been
adjusted for potential confounding factors. Statistical sig-
nificance was set at p < 0.05. All statistical analyses were
performed with SAS statistical software (version 9.1; SAS
Institute Inc., Cary, NC).
Results
MA scores for the patients included in the study are shown
in Fig. 1. After dichotomization into two major categories,
81 (30%) of the incident dialysis patients and 87 (39%) of the
HD patients showed some sign of MA (ranging from mild to
severe). Since the sample sizes for the groups displaying
moderate and severe signs of MA were small in both co-
horts, they were merged for comparative purposes.
Demographic and laboratory data for the cohorts studied
and ratings of MA intensity are shown in Tables 1 and 2. In
Figure 1 Prevalence of muscle atrophy (MA) in ESRD patients
as derived from the subjective global assessment.
560 J.J. Carrero et al.

Table 1 Clinical and biochemical characteristics in 265 incident CKD-5 patients starting dialysis according to their degree of
muscle atrophy (MA)
No signs of MA Mild MA Moderate/severe MA p
(N Z 184), 70% (N Z 59), 22% (N Z 22), 8%
Clinical characteristics
Age (years) 54 (43e64) 59 (48e65) 58 (49e66) n.s.
Sex (% male) 65 54 41 <0.05
Diabetes (%) 28 34 41 <0.01
CVD (%) 28 61 41 <0.001
GFR (ml/min) 6.7  2.3 5.7  1.9 6.4  2.7 n.s.
Nutritional parameters
BMI (kg/m2) 25.4  4.0 22.9  4.1 21.6  5.0 <0.0001
Weight (kg) 75.9  14.1 64.9  13.5 62.9  16.1 <0.0001
IGF-1 (ng/ml) 185 (129e246) 133 (89e94) 107 (55e192) <0.001
s-Creatinine (mmol/l) 775  259 627  183 516  223 <0.0001
s-Albumin (g/l) 33.5  6.2 31.6  7.2 30.5  5.2 <0.05
LBMI (kg/m2) 16.9  2.3 15.6  1.9 15.3  1.8 <0.001
Inflammation parameters
hsCRP (mg/l) 4.0 (1.5e12.8) 12.5 (2.5e24.5)* 6.1 (3.0e34.5) <0.01
IL-6 (pg/ml) 5.5 (3.3e9.2) 9.7 (5.6e17)* 9.3 (5.0e20.5)* <0.001
Data presented as mean  standard deviation or median (interquartile range). n.s., not significant; CVD, cardiovascular disease; BMI,
body mass index; IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor-1; LBMI, lean body mass index; hsCRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; IL-6, inter-
leukin 6.
*p < 0.05, different from the group with no signs of MA.

both cohorts the proportions of women became progres-
sively and significantly higher as the MA scale worsened.
Also, across worsening MA scale, nutritional parameters
and anthropometric measurements tended to be poorer.
Clinical and biochemical reflections of muscle wasting,
i.e., IGF-1 levels, lean body mass index (LBMI), handgrip
strength and MAMC were progressively decreased (Fig. 2).
Furthermore, inflammation parameters (e.g. CRP and IL-6)
became gradually higher. However, some differences be-
tween the two cohorts turned out, probably due to

Table 2 Clinical and biochemical characteristics in 221 prevalent hemodialysis patients according to their degree of muscle
atrophy (MA)
No signs of MA Mild MA Moderate/severe MA p
(N Z 134), 61% (N Z 57), 26% (N Z 30), 13%
Clinical characteristics
Age (years) 62 (47e72) 70 (58e77) 68 (58e78) <0.01
Sex (% male) 67 42 40 <0.001
Diabetes (%) 24 26 27 n.s.
CVD (%) 59 75 67 n.s.
Dialysis vintage (months) 29 (16e57) 29 (15e61) 27 (8e78) n.s.
Nutritional parameters
BMI (kg/m2) 24.8  4.8 24.0  5.0 23.6  7.1 n.s.
Dry weight (kg) 74.6  12.2 67.3  13.9 65.7  17.2 <0.01
IGF-1 (ng/ml) 182 (124e256) 143 (94e225) 138 (79e206) <0.01
s-Creatinine (mmol/l) 838  207 691  143 639  212 <0.0001
s-Albumin (g/l) 35.5  4.2 33.8  4.7 31.5  4.3 <0.0001
LBMI (kg/m2) 16.8  2.6 15.6  2.4 15.8  3.1 <0.01
Inflammation parameters
hsCRP (mg/l) 5.5 (2.3e17.0) 7.3 (2.3e17.5)* 25.5 (6.0e46.3)* 0.001
IL-6 (pg/ml) 7.4 (4.2e11.7) 9.2 (6.2e15.8)* 16.0 (9.5e31.3)* <0.0001
Data presented as mean  standard deviation or median (interquartile range). n.s., not significant; CVD, cardiovascular disease; BMI,
body mass index; IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor-1; LBMI, lean body mass index; hsCRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; IL-6, inter-
leukin 6.
*p < 0.05, different from the group with no signs of MA.
Muscle atrophy and outcome in dialysis 561

Hangrip strength
Incident dialysis patients
% of age-matched controls
CVD in the incident dialysis cohort, such relations were
not observed in the prevalent HD patients, possibly because
of the inclusion of older subjects in the HD cohort.

Prevalent hemodialysis patients

Logistic regression estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95%
confidence intervals (CIs) for presence vs. absence of MA,
after dichotomization of the MA categories into two main
groups, are shown in Table 3. In the incident dialysis cohort,
female sex, inflammation, low IGF-1 levels and a clinical
history of CVD were associated with higher ORs to present
signs of MA. In prevalent HD cohort female sex, inflamma-
tion and low IGF-1 levels, but not clinical history of CVD,
were associated with higher ORs to present signs of MA. In
P<0.0001 in both models, age and DM did not contribute.
both cohorts
During the follow-up periods, 88 (33%) and 85 (38%)
patients died in the incident and prevalent cohorts, re-
spectively. In unadjusted KaplaneMeier curves, a worsening
Mid arm muscle circumference
on MA scales was associated with a higher mortality in both
cohorts (Fig. 3). These differences persisted after adjust-
% of age-matched controls

ment for potential confounding factors by using the Cox

proportional hazards model (Table 4). Thus, patients with
mild signs of MA showed a non-significant trend towards
an increased mortality risk in the incident cohort, that at-
tained statistical significance in the prevalent cohort (Haz-
ard ratio [HR] 1.76 [95% CI: 1.02, 3.01; p Z 0.03]). The HR
of death for moderate/severe MA was 2.62 (95% CI: 1.34,
5.13; p Z 0.001) in the incident dialysis patients and 3.04
(95% CI: 1.61, 5.71; p Z 0.0005) in the prevalent HD
P<0.0001 in patients (Table 4).
both cohorts

No muscle Mild muscle Moderate/severe Discussion

atrophy atrophy
Figure 2 Handgrip strength and mid-arm muscle circumfer-
ence across muscle atrophy categories in 265 incident dialysis
patients and in 221 prevalent hemodialysis patients.
different cohort designs and inclusion criteria. Whereas
worsening MA scores were associated with increasing age
in the HD cohort, such relations were not observed in the
incident dialysis cohort in which age >70 years constituted
an exclusion criterion. Also, whereas worsening MA scores
were associated with increasing prevalence of DM and
muscle atrophy
The present study, performed in two independent ESRD
patient cohorts, demonstrates that a simple subjective
assessment of MA is significantly associated with patient
survival, as well as with multiple measures of inflammatory
and nutritional status. Furthermore, even after adjustment
for confounders, mortality was significantly higher in
patients assessed as having MA.
Although several methods exist to assess the degree of
muscle wasting (from simple ones like MAMC, handgrip
strength or creatinine generation to more sophisticated
including CT-scanning and magnetic resonance), their

Table 3 Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for muscle atrophy after dichotomization into two main groups: no pres-
ence vs. presence of muscle atrophy (from mild to severe) in each of the cohorts studied
Incident dialysis patientsa Hemodialysis patientsb
Odds ratio (95% CI) p Odds ratio (95% CI) p
Intercept of presence of muscle atrophy <0.01 <0.01
Age (>55 [in CKD-5] or 66 [in HD] years) 0.86 (0.39e1.88) n.s. 1.54 (0.81e2.90) n.s.
Diabetes (presence) 1.37 (0.67e2.82) n.s. 1.00 (0.48e2.13) n.s.
Sex (men) 0.43 (0.21e0.86) <0.01 0.31 (0.16e0.56) <0.0001
Cardiovascular disease (presence) 3.08 (1.43e6.65) <0.01 1.17 (0.92e2.23) n.s.
Inflammation (IL-6 > 6.5 [in CKD-5] or 8.6 [in HD] pg/ml) 2.81 (1.33e5.91) <0.001 2.55 (1.38e4.70) <0.01
IGF-1 (<163 [in CKD-5] or 161 [in HD] ng/ml) 1.94 (0.86e3.89) <0.05 1.82 (0.95e3.32) <0.05
The models included muscle atrophy gradation as the dependent variable and factors either significantly associated with the dependent
variable in univariate analysis or with a documented causal relationship. Age, IL-6 and IGF-1 groups were defined according to the me-
dian value in each cohort. n.s., not significant; CRP, C-reactive protein; IGF-1, insulin-like growth factor-1; IL-6, interleukin-6.
a
Pseudo r2 Z 0.18, p < 0.0001.
b
Pseudo r2 Z 0.17, p < 0.0001.
562 J.J. Carrero et al.

A DEXA and anthropometrics), handgrip strength and MAMC.

IGF-1 (part of the pathway mediating growth hormone ac-
tion in skeletal muscle) is being increasingly recognized as
a sensitive indicator of the muscle catabolic state and
PEW present in CKD.22,23 Thus, it is interesting that also
IGF-1 levels decreased across MA categories in our study
No MA
and contributed to increase the ORs of MA.
Mild MA The present study comprised two separate cohorts, one
Moderate/
severe MA of incident dialysis patients and one of prevalent hemodi-
Log-Rank 35.0; p<0.0001 alysis patients. MA was common, and the prevalence
similar, in both cohorts. Approximately one third of the
patients showed some sign of MA. Also of note, the
proportion of women increased with worsening MA, consis-
B tent with a previous report of an approximately 30%
increased prevalence of muscle wasting in non-Hispanic
No MA
healthy white healthy women vs. men of a similar age
range.24 The reasons for the increased prevalence of MA in
Mild MA uremic women is not apparent from the present study, but
may include differences in fat distribution and/or body
Moderate/ composition as well as a sex-specific effect of uremia on ap-
severe MA petite17 and food intake. Supporting this hypothesis, older
Log-Rank 25.8; p<0.0001
sarcopenic women (60 years) in the NHANES III study
showed increased functional disability as compared to their
male counterparts.25
As muscle loss is a common feature of many inflamma-
Figure 3 KaplaneMeier curves depicting the cumulative pro- tory disorders, it has been suggested that subclinical
portion of survivors according to their muscle atrophy (MA) chronic inflammation is an important component of the
grading among 265 incident dialysis patients (A) and 221 prev- pathophysiology of muscle wasting.26 Pro-inflammatory cy-
alent hemodialysis patients (B). tokines, such as IL-6 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF), stim-
ulate the breakdown of muscle protein.27 The close
association between muscle wasting and IL-6 in previous
reproducibility, time-consumption and in some cases their
studies performed in CKD patients6,28 suggests that IL-6
cost make them often impractical and difficult to imple-
may be associated with muscle wasting also in patients
ment in a clinical setting.15 Furthermore, while LBMI may
with advanced CKD. The present study supports such a hy-
be influenced by the hydration status,21 MAMC may relate
pothesis, as inflammation (defined by median IL-6 levels)
to fat mass.4 In this study we demonstrate that a simple vi-
was, indeed, a significant determinant of MA in our cohorts.
sual assessment of muscle mass relates very well to classic
The same association was found for CRP, in agreement with
markers of muscle wasting such as LBMI (as assessed both by
some,29 but not all9 studies in CKD patients.
Contrary to our expectations, neither age nor diabetes
Table 4 Adjusted relative risk of all-cause mortality ac-
was a significant determinant of MA in the present study.
cording to muscle atrophy categories in 265 incident dialysis
This was unanticipated, as skeletal muscle mass typically
patients (A) and in 221 prevalent hemodialysis patients (B)
declines with age9,30 and HD diabetic patients present in-
creased muscle protein breakdown29 and accelerated loss
Hazard ratio p of lean body mass.31 As MA in the present study was associ-
A: Incident dialysis patients ated with a low handgrip strength and lower circulating
Mild muscle atrophy 1.29 (0.71e2.34) n.s. IGF-1 (objective measurements of muscle wasting), it ap-
Moderate/severe muscle 2.62 (1.34e5.13) 0.001 pears likely that factors such as uremia,7 dialytic proce-
atrophy dure8,32 and inflammation11 may be more important in
Likelihood ratio (c2) Z 57.03, p < 0.0001 determining muscle mass in this patient group.
Adjusted for age (median), sex, inflammation (median Also of note in the present study is the association
IL-6), diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease and between MA and CVD in the incident dialysis cohort. While
glomerular filtration rate (median). inflammation and malnutrition (PEW) have long been
recognized to be associated with CVD and a poor outcome
B: Hemodialysis patients in ESRD,16 cardiac disease per se has also been shown to
Mild muscle atrophy 1.76 (1.02e3.01) 0.03 contribute to muscle catabolism.33 Indeed, in non-uremic
Moderate/severe muscle 3.04 (1.61e5.71) 0.0005 chronic heart failure (CHF), cardiac cachexia is a serious
atrophy complication characterized by PEW and a poor prognosis.34
Likelihood ratio (c2) Z 66.17, p < 0.0001 As CHF is common in ESRD and associated with CVD,35 it is
Adjusted for age (median), sex, inflammation (median not surprising that CVD is also an important predictor of
IL-6), diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease and MA in this population. Finally, as there should be a close
time on hemodialysis (median). correlation between diabetes and CVD, the effect of CVD
may take away the effect of diabetes due to collinearity.
Muscle atrophy and outcome in dialysis
Some limitations of the present cross-sectional study
should be considered. First, the cross-sectional design of
our study makes causal inference impossible. Second, our
results are influenced by the different inclusion/exclusion
criteria, as well as the differing natures, of the cohorts
studied. However, this is also a strength as it allows us to
make more broadly applicable findings. Third, body weight,
skinfold thicknesses and DEXA may all be affected by fluid
retention in the ESRD setting.21 However, our findings were
consistent and also correlated with markers not influenced
by fluid status, such as handgrip strength and IGF-1.
In summary, the present study shows that a simple
subjective assessment of MA may constitute a clinically
relevant tool to predict patients’ mortality risk. While an
association between muscle wasting and mortality has
been already documented in CKD,12,13 also in the presence
of obesity,14 the present study is to our knowledge the first
to use such a simple and inexpensive assessment and sup-
ports the use of frequent MA and/or nutritional assess-
ments in the clinical practice. Early detection of muscle
loss may allow the implementation of appropriate thera-
peutic and preventive measures such as resistance train-
ing,36 exercise maintenance,37 increasing protein intake38
or a combination of both approaches, which seems to
reverse MA39 and increase albumin fractional synthetic
rate40 in HD patients.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank the patients and personnel involved
in the creation of these cohorts. Also, we are indebted to
our research staff at KBC (Ann Dreiman-Lif, Annika Nilsson
and Anki Emmoth) and KFC (Björn Anderstam, Monica
Ericsson and Anki Bragfors-Helin).
Sources of funding
The MIMICK cohort was supported by an unrestricted pro-
ject grant from Amgen Inc. We also benefited from
Karolinska Institutet Center for Gender-based Research,
MEC (EX2006-1670), the Swedish Heart and Lung Founda-
tion, the Swedish Medical Research Council, the Swedish
Exports Association, Martin Rind’s and Westman’s Founda-
tions, an unconditional grant from Scandinavian Clinical
Nutrition AB and research grants from the ERA-EDTA.
Conflict of interest statement
B.L. is affiliated with Baxter Healthcare Inc. None of the
other authors had any conflicts of interest.
References
1. Fouque D, Kalantar-Zadeh K, Kopple J, et al. A proposed no-
menclature and diagnostic criteria for protein-energy wasting
in acute and chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int 2008;73:391e8.
2. Kalantar-Zadeh K, Ikizler TA, Block G, Avram MM, Kopple JD.
Malnutrition-inflammation complex syndrome in dialysis pa-
tients: causes and consequences. Am J Kidney Dis 2003;42:
864e81.
563
3. Qureshi AR, Alvestrand A, Danielsson A, et al. Factors predict-
ing malnutrition in hemodialysis patients: a cross-sectional
study. Kidney Int 1998;53:773e82.
4. Heimburger O, Qureshi AR, Blaner WS, Berglund L,
Stenvinkel P. Hand-grip muscle strength, lean body mass, and
plasma proteins as markers of nutritional status in patients
with chronic renal failure close to start of dialysis therapy.
Am J Kidney Dis 2000;36:1213e25.
5. Kaysen GA. Diabetes, a cause of progressive sarcopenia in dial-
ysis patients? Kidney Int 2005;68:2396e7.
6. Kaizu Y, Ohkawa S, Odamaki M, Ikegaya N, Hibi I, Miyaji K,
Kumagai H. Association between inflammatory mediators and
muscle mass in long-term hemodialysis patients. Am J Kidney
Dis 2003;42:295e302.
7. Du J, Hu Z, Mitch WE. Molecular mechanisms activating muscle
protein degradation in chronic kidney disease and other cata-
bolic conditions. Eur J Clin Invest 2005;35:157e63.
8. Ikizler TA, Pupim LB, Brouillette JR, et al. Hemodialysis stimu-
lates muscle and whole body protein loss and alters substrate
oxidation. Am J Physiol 2002;282:E107e16.
9. Foley RN, Wang C, Ishani A, Collins AJ, Murray AM. Kidney func-
tion and sarcopenia in the United States general population:
NHANES III. Am J Nephrol 2007;27:279e86.
10. Mak RH, Cheung W. Cachexia in chronic kidney disease: role of
inflammation and neuropeptide signaling. Curr Opin Nephro
Hypertens 2007;16:27e31.
11. Mitch WE. Malnutrition is an unusual cause of decreased muscle
mass in chronic kidney disease. J Ren Nutr 2007;17:66e9.
12. Desmeules S, Levesque R, Jaussent I, Leray-Moragues H,
Chalabi L, Canaud B. Creatinine index and lean body mass
are excellent predictors of long-term survival in haemodiafil-
tration patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004;19:1182e9.
13. Dong J, Li YJ, Lu XH, Gan HP, Zuo L, Wang HY. Correlations of
lean body mass with nutritional indicators and mortality in
patients on peritoneal dialysis. Kidney Int 2008;73:334e40.
14. Honda H, Qureshi AR, Axelsson J, et al. Obese sarcopenia in pa-
tients with end-stage renal disease is associated with inflam-
mation and increased mortality. Am J Clin Nutr 2007;86:
633e8.
15. Workeneh BT, Rondon-Berrios H, Zhang L, et al. Development
of a diagnostic method for detecting increased muscle protein
degradation in patients with catabolic conditions. J Am Soc
Nephrol 2006;17:3233e9.
16. Stenvinkel P, Heimburger O, Paultre F, et al. Strong association
between malnutrition, inflammation, and atherosclerosis in
chronic renal failure. Kidney Int 1999;55:1899e911.
17. Carrero JJ, Qureshi AR, Axelsson J, et al. Comparison of nutri-
tional and inflammatory markers in dialysis patients with re-
duced appetite. Am J Clin Nutr 2007;85:695e701.
18. Durnin JV, Womersley J. Body fat assessed from total body
density and its estimation from skinfold thickness: measure-
ments on 481 men and women aged from 16 to 72 years. Br J
Nutr 1974;32:77e97.
19. Kyle UG, Schutz Y, Dupertuis YM, Pichard C. Body composition
interpretation. Contributions of the fat-free mass index and
the body fat mass index. Nutrition 2003;19:597e604.
20. Detsky AS, McLaughlin JR, Baker JP, et al. What is subjective
global assessment of nutritional status? J Parenter Enter Nutr
1987;11:8e13.
21. Nielsen PK, Ladefoged J, Olgaard K. Lean body mass by Dual
Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) and by urine and dialysate
creatinine recovery in CAPD and pre-dialysis patients
compared to normal subjects. Adv Periton Dial 1994;10:
99e103.
22. Axelsson J, Qureshi AR, Divino-Filho JC, et al. Are insulin-like
growth factor and its binding proteins 1 and 3 clinically useful
as markers of malnutrition, sarcopenia and inflammation in
end-stage renal disease? Eur J Clin Nutr 2006;60:718e26.
564
23. Mak RH, Rotwein P. Myostatin and insulin-like growth factors in
uremic sarcopenia: the yin and yang in muscle mass regulation.
Kidney Int 2006;70:410e2.
24. Baumgartner RN, Koehler KM, Gallagher D, et al. Epidemiology
of sarcopenia among the elderly in New Mexico. Am J Epide-
miol 1998;147:755e63.
25. Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Ross R. Low relative skeletal muscle
mass (sarcopenia) in older persons is associated with functional
impairment and physical disability. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002;50:
889e96.
26. Roubenoff R. Catabolism of aging: is it an inflammatory pro-
cess? Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 2003;6:295e9.
27. Goodman MN. Interleukin-6 induces skeletal muscle protein
breakdown in rats. Proceedings of the Society for Experimen-
tal Biology and Medicine Society for Experimental Biology
and Medicine 1994;205:182e5 (New York, NY).
28. Castaneda-Sceppa C, Sarnak MJ, Wang X, et al. Role of adipose
tissue in determining muscle mass in patients with chronic kid-
ney disease. J Ren Nutr 2007;17:314e22.
29. Pupim LB, Flakoll PJ, Majchrzak KM, Aftab Guy DL,
Stenvinkel P, Ikizler TA. Increased muscle protein breakdown
in chronic hemodialysis patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Kidney Int 2005;68:1857e65.
30. Janssen I, Heymsfield SB, Baumgartner RN, Ross R. Estimation
of skeletal muscle mass by bioelectrical impedance analysis.
J Appl Physiol 2000;89:465e71.
31. Pupim LB, Heimburger O, Qureshi AR, Ikizler TA, Stenvinkel P.
Accelerated lean body mass loss in incident chronic dialysis pa-
tients with diabetes mellitus. Kidney Int 2005;68:2368e74.
32. McIntyre CW, Selby NM, Sigrist M, Pearce LE, Mercer TH,
Naish PF. Patients receiving maintenance dialysis have more
J.J. Carrero et al.
severe functionally significant skeletal muscle wasting than
patients with dialysis-independent chronic kidney disease.
Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006;21:2210e6.
33. Norrelund H, Wiggers H, Halbirk M, et al. Abnormalities of
whole body protein turnover, muscle metabolism and levels
of metabolic hormones in patients with chronic heart failure.
J Intern Med 2006;260:11e21.
34. von Haehling S, Doehner W, Anker SD. Nutrition, metabolism,
and the complex pathophysiology of cachexia in chronic heart
failure. Cardiovasc Res 2007;73:298e309.
35. Foley RN, Parfrey PS, Sarnak MJ. Clinical epidemiology of car-
diovascular disease in chronic renal disease. Am J Kidney Dis
1998;32:S112e9.
36. Cheema B, Abas H, Smith B, et al. Randomized controlled trial
of intradialytic resistance training to target muscle wasting in
ESRD: the Progressive Exercise for Anabolism in Kidney Disease
(PEAK) study. Am J Kidney Dis 2007;50:574e84.
37. Kopple JD, Wang H, Casaburi R, et al. Exercise in maintenance
hemodialysis patients induces transcriptional changes in genes
favoring anabolic muscle. J Am Soc Nephrol 2007;18:2975e86.
38. Castaneda C, Charnley JM, Evans WJ, Crim MC. Elderly women
accommodate to a low-protein diet with losses of body cell
mass, muscle function, and immune response. Am J Clin Nutr
1995;62:30e9.
39. Majchrzak KM, Pupim LB, Flakoll PJ, Ikizler TA. Resistance ex-
ercise augments the acute anabolic effects of intradialytic oral
nutritional supplementation. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2008;23:
1362e9.
40. Pupim LB, Flakoll PJ, Ikizler TA. Exercise improves albumin
fractional synthetic rate in chronic hemodialysis patients. Eur
J Clin Nutr 2007;61:686e9.