Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Broad split up of 1 year Schedule beginning from May 17, 2014 and ending on May 15, 2015.
Police Training at Chandigarh Judicial Academy and visit to Forensic and Computer
Lab at Chandigarh and Mohali.
Bharat Darshan
♦ The Officers will undergo field training from May 19, 2014 to May 24,
2014; July 16, 2014 to June 30, 2014 and August 22, 2014 to September 10,
2014.
♦ During their field training, whatever difficulties are faced by Trainee Judicial
Officers, they will intimate the same to the Faculty Members by e-mail. The
work done statement will also be sent to the Academy by them. The Faculty
Members will respond to the difficulties and queries immediately.
♦ From September 11, 2014 to September 16, 2014 the Officers will reconcile
what they are taught in the Academy and practical experience in the field.
♦ The training on this part of the matter would commence w.e.f. September 17,
2014 and would run upto October 18, 2014. Thereafter, the Trainee Judicial
Officers will go to the sessions divisions and will actually record evidence in
Civil Cases. They will be in the field from October 20, 2014 to November 22,
2014. From November 25, 2014 to December 20, 2014 they will again undergo
Institutional Training at the Academy and then field training at their respective
places of posting from December 22, 2014 to January 10, 2015.
♦ During their field training, whatever difficulties are faced by Trainee Judicial
Officers, they will intimate the same to the Faculty Members by e-mail. The
work done statement will also be sent to the Academy by them. The Faculty
Members will respond to the difficulties and queries immediately.
♦ They will be back to the Academy and period upto January 16, 2015 will be
utilized in reconciling what they have been taught in the Academy and
practical experience in the field.
SESSION – III (January 17, 2015 to January 31, 2015)
♦ From January 17, 2015 to January 31, 2015, the Trainee Judicial Officers will
undergo Police Training and training regarding the files being maintained by
the Staff like Reader, Ahlmad, Record Keeper etc.
♦ From February 1, 2015 to February 28, 2015, Trainee Judicial Officers will
undergo Institutional training in the Academy.
♦ From March 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 Trainee Judicial Officers will undergo
field training at their place of posting.
♦ TJOs will sit with the Senior Judicial Officers on the dias. They will hear
arguments alongwith orders passed on various applications, suits or criminal
cases. They will themselves pass orders and judgments. They shall e-mail the
same to the Faculty Members who will evaluate the said orders and
judgments. Wherever necessary, Faculty Members will appreciate the orders
and judgments passed by the TJOs and wherever they find fault, they will
guide TJOs through e-mail itself.
♦ From April 1, 2015 to April 15, 2015 Trainee Judicial Officers will reconcile what
they are taught in the Academy and their practical experience in the field.
♦ During this period the Trainee Judicial Officers will be imparted practical
training regarding execution proceedings arising in civil matters.
♦ Bharat Darshan.
NOTE : Before the Trainee Judicial Officers are sent to the field for their Field Training,
their respective Sessions Judges will be sensitized about the matter.
They would be requested to assign Kachi Peshi to the Trainee Judicial Officers,
they would further be requested to ensure that after Lunch, all the Judicial
Officers would sit with their senior counterparts during remand proceedings.
During the training of recording and appreciation of the evidence, the Sessions
Judges will ensure that recording of evidence for Civil Cases is actually assigned
to the Trainee Judicial Officers and then Officers would actually record the
evidence.
During the 3rd session of the training the Sessions Judges will be requested to
ensure that Trainee Judicial Officers will sit on the dias alongwith their senior
counterparts during the passing off orders as well as final judgments and then
Trainee Judicial Officers will pass orders and judgments separately.
PHASE - I
CIVIL PROCEDURE
FIRST DAY ZIMNI ORDER, WHAT TO BE SEEN AND WHAT TO BE DONE BY CIVIL
JUDGES ON RECEIPT OF FOLLOWING TYPES OF SUITS.
The Faculty will provide intimation/knowledge to the Trainee Judicial Officers with
respect to the following in particular :-
• It was detected that an officer called the Ahlmad and asked him to prepare
summons but he refused by stating that it is not his duty and it is the duty of
the Advocate.
• Sometimes, the Civil Judges pass a restrain order restraining the respondent
from doing a particular act and then add that the status quo be maintained.
• The Civil Judges are confused about two propositions i.e:-
(1) The plaintiff has to stand on his own legs.
(2) The proposition that a particular plea of the plaintiff has not been
rebutted specifically in the written statement.
• Some of the Civil Judges are not aware as to what is the difference between a
Civil Judge and a Judicial Magistrate.
• Sometimes, what happens is, one of the parties dies and its LRs are impleaded
and in some cases some new party is added. In such like circumstances, we
seek amended title only. The result is that when we dictate and scribe
judgment, we detail the parties as per the original plaint and we forget to see
the amended title of the plaint. Therefore, whenever the amended title is
called for, a note should be given on the original plaint that the amended title
dated____ be seen before passing the judgment.
• What happens is some times we have to just grant date and still we keep the
files pending. The Advocates keep on coming for enquiring about their cases,
but somehow the dates are granted at the end of the day. This practice has to
be curbed. Be considerate towards the Advocates and the litigants so that
they do not have to come to the court just to take dates time and again. If you
are hearing arguments and the Advocate comes; see if his case is to be
disposed of first and then continue with the arguments.
WHAT HAS TO BE SECOND ZIMNI ORDER
• The defendant turns up either personally or Advocate before the next day
fixed for his appearance.
• The Court is informed that the defendant is present in the Court or in some
other Court.
• Defendant not served personally but he/she has been served through his/her
Secretary/Member of family.
• Generally, when reported that the respondent has not been served, without
bothering to know the actual report, the Civil Judges direct that the
respondent be served again.
• Sometimes, in such a case, some of the Civil Judges order that the defendant
be served "through all the modes".
• The Civil Judges are to be aware that the procedure is meant to facilitate the
court to arrive at a proper decision.
• RC is not returned.
• In a case where publication was ordered, the publication charges were not
deposited. The officer insisted for dismissal of the case. The Advocate
requested for a date by stating that he is going to deposit the money on that
day itself. In such cases, the Magistrates/Civil Judges must be reasonable.
• What happens is, we issue publication, on occasions we issue dasti publication.
Dasti is some time likely to be misused. It may happen that a party may ensure
that its publisher has no time to send RC to the respondent. Similarly,
sometimes the publisher may be doubtful as to whether the same has been
issued by the court or not. So, in the process, the publication may be delayed.
• Defendant appears and seeks time for engaging an Advocate or for filing
written statement.
• After the case is fixed for ex-parte evidence, the defendant appears before
the Court before the next date and prays for setting aside ex-parte order.
• In some of the cases, it has been found that the defendant has been ordered
to be heard ex-parte and then the case has been adjourned for consideration
of issues.
• Ex-parte stay for protecting the the public property and for restraining the
defendant from interfering into the day to day working of the employees and
to restrain the defendants from demolishing the property of the Government.
Discuss whether ex-parte stay should be granted or not.
• A party wants an ex-parte stay. It is established on the file that the plaintiff has
been in possession of the suit property for long. Injunction is sought against
the State restraining it from dispossessing the plaintiff. What will you do?
• The plaintiff alleges that he has been in possession of the demised premises as
a tenant. No receipts have been issued by the respondent. The electricity
meter is installed in a room, which is in possession of the landlord/respondent.
Now the respondent has threatened to dispossess the plaintiff illegally and
forcibly. What will you do?
• Please grant the stay wherever it is warranted. Please acquit the accused
wherever the case is of the acquittal.
• Where the plaintiff has documentary evidence and prima facie case, the ex-
parte stay is not granted.
• The proposal is that wherever the ex-parte stay is granted, the date of notice
should be the routine date. The reason is that in case the defendant has got
any grievance regarding the ex-parte stay, he would come running and if he
does not come that means that the purpose of litigation has been achieved
and there is no urgency.
• Whenever an application is filed U/O 39 Rule 4 CPC, the notice of the same
would be given immediately or of a day of the application moved U/O 39 Rule
4 CPC.
• Some times what happens is ex-parte stay is not granted and on notice the
other party appears and sometimes the defendant tries to delay the
consideration of stay application. This practice has to be curbed. The Courts
may, where deems proper, order the stay till the filing of the written
statement.
• On the first day itself the defendant appears and files written statement.
• Defendant appears and seeks time to file written statement and reply to the
stay application. How much liberty to be granted to the defendant for filing
written statement and for filing reply to stay and for consideration of stay
application.
• What to do when the defendant fails to file written statement despite
adequate opportunity.
• What rights the defendant has when the right to defence has been struck off.
• Within how much time stay application is to be disposed off after the
defendant comes present.
• What to do when the case is fixed for appearance of the defendant or for
filing written statement and the plaintiff does not appear.
• What to be done when both the plaintiff and the defendant do not appear.
• What to do when the Suit is dismissed in default but the plaintiff or the
defendant appears on the same day and seeks setting aside of the dismissal
order.
• What to do when there is a counter claim and the plaintiff does not appear on
the given date.
• What to do when there is counter claim and the defendant does not appear
and only the plaintiff appears.
• What to do when there is counter claim and both the plaintiff and the
defendant do not appear.
• When and where to impose costs. What costs are not paid.
• What to do when it is found that the necessary party has not been impleaded.
• What to do when an application is filed in pending cases not fixed for that day.
ISSUES
• There was a case for specific performance instituted in June 2006. But the
issues could be framed in this case only five years after the institution of the
suit.
• It is found that invariably all kinds of issues are framed though they do not
arise from the pleadings.
• The Civil Judges are invariably found wanting to know as to on whom the onus
lies. The basic principle is that the onus of the issue lies on a party, which sets
up a particular plea.
• What to do in case issues are re-framed & what is necessary to do before
dictating judgment.
• Some times issues are re-framed and subsequently the issues, which were
earlier framed, are taken into consideration and judgment is rendered on
earlier issues only. Therefore, the Judges must go through the entire zimni
order sheets before returning their findings on various issues. Whenever the
issues are re-framed, then the Judges must give an endorsement on the zimini
order sheet where the earlier issues framed that "See Issues dated____"
• If at some time, a judicial official gets annoyed with someone, he/she must
make it a point that the litigant or the Advocate should not suffer.
• Some times, a party comes to complain that whereas it kept on sitting outside,
the counsel for the other party came in and took the date and went away and
when the party went inside, it was informed that the case has already been
adjourned. The Judges should ensure that they should adjourn the cases only
after calling the case.
• Sometimes notices to the Hon'ble retired Judges of the High Courts or some
other senior officers are sent in the form of a direction.
• In some civil suits where either the defendant admits the case of the plaintiff
or the defendant is ex-parte and after close of the ex-parte evidence, the civil
suits remain pending for months together for passing appropriate orders. Such
practice should be discontinued.
• The routine with the Judges is that they pick up the case in accordance with
their respective serial numbers in the cause list. Some times the worthy
Advocate approaches the court in the morning itself. Since in the case nothing
is to be done, therefore, the Advocate requests the court to grant the date in
such a case. But, the Judges advise the Advocate to come when the case is
called. The suggested solution is that since the Advocates have to cover other
courts also, therefore, if they come to collect a date, their files should be
picked up immediately and date be granted.
• The Judges should try to adjourn those cases at the outset itself, wherein
nothing is to be done, so that the court should keep only those files wherein
some concrete work has to be done.
• Some of the Officers do not ensure that the orders passed by them are duly
conveyed to the Advocates or their Clerks or the parties themselves.
• The Officers must grant bail and injunction in appropriate cases. Sometimes, it
has been observed by the Hon'ble Chief Justice that even in the most
deserving cases, the bail and injunction are not granted. Wherever (the
Hon'ble Chief Justice has observed) the Officers have not been able to grant
bail and injunction in the appropriate case the same would be reflected in their
ACRs.
• The Officers have been advised to be brief while dictating the orders and the
judgments.
• Once an Advocate stated that he wanted to withdraw his case, the Judicial
Officer handed over the Judicial File to the Advocate, instead of passing the
order on the file, after recording statement of the Advocate.
• Some times the cases are called, but, the Advocates of the called cases do not
come present. However, other Advocates of other cases keep sitting and
waiting for their turn. First of all, dispose of their cases particularly if they do
not have a lengthy job.
• Some of the Judicial Officers try to slam the doors of the court on a litigant on
finding a minor flaw. For the sake of an example, in one case, the application
was not signed by the Advocate inadvertently though he owned it and
proposed to sign the same, yet, the learned Judicial Officer was pleased to
dismiss the same. The result is that the Advocate, the office and the Judicial
Officer have to do the entire exercise again. The system is already
overburdened, therefore, all the Judicial Officers are advised to avoid
burdening the system further.
(Practical Training regarding Criminal Matters)
(iv) Calendars
(v) Criminal Complaint in a case triable by a Magistrate.
(vi) Criminal complaint regarding offences exclusively triable by the Sessions
Court.
(vii) Complaint u/s 340 Cr.P.C.
(viii) Criminal complaint under provision of Protection of Women from Domestic
Violence Act, 2005.
• Sometimes wives are earning even double than the income of their husband
and, still, the husband is directed to pay more amount than his income, what
to do.
• What to do when the accused himself surrenders and claims that a criminal
case in the Court is pending against him.
• What to do when a person surrenders before the Magistrate though no case
is pending and files the bail application.
• What to do when no case against the person is pending but the Police seeks
Non-Bailable Warrant against a particular person.
• Sometimes it happens that bail order has been passed. The Numberdar and
the surety are present, but they are made to wait.
• The Magistrate must ensure that in every remand application, the date of
arrest of the accused is recorded. It is the duty of the Magistrate to ensure
that provisions of Section 167(2)Cr.P.C are not violated.
• What to be done when ladies are produced before the Court with allegations
of prostitution.
• What to do when the accused either appears or he claims that he is a minor.
• What to do when an accused is presented and transit remand is prayed for.
• What to do when a person files bail application by alleging that he has been
granted anticipatory bail or a regular bail by the Hon’ble Superior Court, or any
other Superior Court.
• In small quantity cases, where the total prescribed imprisonment is one
month, even there the bail applications are dismissed by the Magistrates.
Resultantly, when the man is out of jail, he has already spent more time in the
jail than the time he would have spent in the jail had he been convicted and
sentenced.
• What if the accused jumps bail during anticipatory bail or when the bail order
is passed by a Superior Court.
• What if the accused, while on bail, does not appear on a particular date.
• Whether the Court can refuse to accept Challan.
• What to do when the challan is present but the accused is not present.
• What to do when the challan is presented and the accused is also present.
• Whether the Court can direct the prosecution to file Challan.
• Do not refuse to attest the affidavit of a prosecution witness on the ground
that the police station concerned is not within your jurisdiction.
• What to do when a criminal complaint is presented under offences triable by
the Magistrate.
• What to do when a criminal complaint is presented in a Sessions case.
• Sometimes it happens that there are two cases arising out of the same
transaction. One is committed to the Sessions Judge and the other is triable by
the Magistrate.
• The tendency of fixing too many cases in their cause lists.
• In one of the cases, it has been discovered that there were three accused. Two
accused were being summoned, whereas the 3rd accused was appearing
regularly. He is coming to court from Delhi after every fortnight. In such like
cases, the accused, who has been coming regularly, his presence can be
exempted till the presence of the other accused is secured/obtained.
Otherwise also, the accused has to come from such a distant place only to
collect a date. The said purpose can also be achieved through the counsel of
such an accused.
• What to be seen while accepting Bail Bonds furnished by a Party or its Surety.
• The Judges should also realize that surety bond and the surety is such, which is
reasonable.
• What to do when there is request for recording statement u/s 164 Cr.P.C.
• In a case of theft, the statement of the accused must be recorded as to
whether he claims ownership of stolen property.
• The case is under Sections 406 and 498-A IPC and the mother-in-law and the
father-in-law of the lady have remained in jail for a week, what the Judge is to
do in case the bail application is presented.
• The allegations are that the accused had stolen Rs.59,000/- and one LCD.
However, no recovery of any kind stands effected. The bail application has
been dismissed by holding that the allegations are serious.
• In one case, cheque was of Rs. one lakh and the bail order of Rs.4 lakhs was
passed.
• Sometimes the Hon’ble High Court or Supreme Court directs that the accused
be not arrested till a particular date and before that date if a regular bail
application is filed that be considered and disposed off by the Magistrate.
What to do.
• In a case where the FIR is registered under Sections 323, 452 and other similar
Sections, interim anticipatory is granted to the accused. Subsequently, the
police arrest the accused by adding Section 326 IPC. When the accused is
brought before the Magistrate, it is brought to his notice that the accused was
already under interim anticipatory bail. The prosecution states that the interim
bail order was not in the notice of the police. After the police comes to know
about the interim anticipatory in question the police seeks police remand of
the accused. What the Magistrate should do?
• Sometimes, neither the presence of the accused has been marked, nor his
presence has been exempted, nor any other explanation for his absence has
been given. But, at the same time, the case is being proceeded for recording
the evidence of the prosecution/complainant in the absence of the accused.
• In some of the cases, it has been observed that free legal aid assistance has
been provided to a particular party. On occasions the Judicial Officers impose
costs upon such a party. The Judicial Officers are requested to find out some
other way of meeting any exigency.
• Sometimes in the criminal cases in which free legal aid has been provided,
copies supplied to the accused are not complete. Hence, the Judicial Officers
in such cases are advised to be co-operative with the free legal aid Advocates
and ensure that whenever they demand, copies be supplied.
• In which ever case the free legal aid is provided, it should be written on file in
bold letters that free legal aid is provided in this case.
• The Judicial Officers may call the free legal aid Advocates provided to the
accused by making a phone call.
• Sometimes free legal aid services are provided to a litigant and a private
Advocate also appears on his behalf, even then, whenever the free legal
Advocate appears his presence must be marked on behalf of the said litigant.
EVIDENCE
CIVIL CASES
• Application for permission to produce some, more evidence when the same
has already been closed by order.
• Some times what happens is that the court either closes the evidence of a
party or holds the cross examination of a witness nil. Thereafter, an application
is filed either for grant of another opportunity to adduce the evidence by the
party whose evidence is closed by order or for calling the witness. Some times
what happens is that the Judicial Officer dismisses the said application by
stating that he has no authority to recall or revoke his/her earlier order. But,
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Kannan has circulated an order thereby declaring that the
Judge passing such an order has got the requisite authority to
reconsider/review her/his earlier decision.
• Difference between documents which have been exhibited and which have
been marked only.
• What to be seen when allowing evidence in rebuttal.
• Objections which are raised usually during examination and cross examination
and objections which are raised ordinarily regarding exhibition of the
documents.
• The courts invariably grant last opportunity and on some occasions close the
evidence of the plaintiff, defendant or prosecution. The court by adopting
one of the ways closes the evidence and then adjourns the case for the
appropriate next step. But, it is advisable that it should be ordered that in case
the party whose evidence has been closed by order brings in any evidence on
the next date, it would be recorded first subject to costs of Rs.____.
• Some times it becomes clear in the morning itself that there is no witness in
the particular cases, but the cases are kept pending till 4.00 p.m.
• Some witness may be dispensed with by the officer like the witnesses
pertaining to registering FIR, like who drew/scaled site plan, photographer etc.
• Ensure that the Doctor prosecution witness is summoned first so that he may
not be transferred in the mean time.
• In a case under Section 125 Cr.P.C, interim maintenance was granted and the
case was adjourned for evidence of the petitioner. On the next date, the
petitioner insisted for the payment of interim maintenance ordered by the
learned JMIC and the learned JMIC insisted that first witnesses be recorded.
Discuss.
• In a case, Advocate's father-in-law passed away, but, a Judicial Officer
imposed costs and granted date.
• Please ensure that you are polite and courteous towards all human beings,
particularly towards the doctors. Please also ensure that the moment it comes to
your notice that there is a doctor present in your court for the purpose of his/her
evidence, record his/her evidence promptly in order to free him/her as early as
possible, as there may be patients, may be your relatives, awaiting the doctors.
• Some of the Magistrates have remarked that they would never close evidence of the
prosecution in a case under Section 498-A IPC (Discuss)
• The witness has not named even a single person, who has caused a particular
injury, but the Magistrate has convicted ten accused for the offence
punishable under Section 323 IPC. However, on the strength of the discussion,
he should have convicted all of them under Section 323 read with Section
149 IPC. For that matter, he was required to prove on file that all the accused
had common intention of causing the injury in question. But no reference
was made to Section 149 IPC.
• A person was convicted under Section 148 IPC, but no ingredient of the
Section 148 IPC was discussed or proved on file.
• The accused were convicted under Section 341 IPC, but no ingredient of this
Section 341 was discussed.
• The convicts have a right of being heard on the question of probation. But,
they were heard only on the quantum of sentence.
• There are a few courts which hear the arguments, but do not like to
pronounce the order for months together.
• Sometimes the Civil Judges order "the suit be decreed." It means that
somebody else has to decree the suit, whereas it is the job of the Civil Judge
himself.
• One of the Civil Judges has decreed the suit for recovery and has directed that
the decretal amount be paid within seven days.
• In some of the cases, the arguments extended by an Advocate against whom
ultimately the judgment is delivered are not reflected in the judgment and at
the same time sometimes even the judgments cited by such an Advocate also
do not find mention in the judgment.
• The Advocates invariably report that the judgments cited by them are not
reflected or referred to in the judgment.
• In the judgments recorded by the Judicial Officers, the names of the counsel
are not reflected.
• One SSP has stated that some times even when the police is convinced that no
police case is made out against a person, the police has to register a criminal
case by wilting under the pressure of the Public, which organizes Dharna and
Gherao etc. He stated that the police does so in the hope that the Judiciary will
rectify the error. On the other hand, some of the Magistrates state that since
the police has mentioned in the FIR some Sections which indicate grave
offences, therefore, they are not going to grant bail to the accused.
• I wanted to cross the road. The moment I stepped on the road, the respondent
came driving his truck rashly and negligently. He struck his truck against me. At
the time of the accident, I was on the extreme left side of my road. Who is
negligent?
CONSTITUTIONAL AND SUBSTANTIVE LAWS
For teaching this part of the curriculum, the 5th period on every working day will be
utilized.
Judicial leadership
Court Management
Adjudication Management
Judicial Accountability.
Recusal
Fairness
Standards for Ethical Conduct of Judges
Court Rules, interface with society
Identifying and Avoiding Prejudices and
Biases.
Access to Justice Initiatives
Legal Aid
Interpretation of Statutes :-
• Role of Interpretation – Internal and
External Aids.
• Doctrine of Stare Decisis.
• Legal language and Latin Maxims.
Environmental Laws
• Concept of Environment Ecology.
• Environment Pollution and Sustainable
Development.
• Environment protection : Common Law
Remedies (Tort).
• Statutory Remedies :-
♦ IPC – Sections 268, 294A, 426, 430, 431
and 432.
♦ CPC – Sections 91 and 133.
♦ Cr.P.C.- Section 89.
♦ Environment Protection Legislation : An
Overview.
REVENUE
Khasra Girdawaris
• 6th period every day will be reserved for revision of the work done during the
day by sitting in the Library. There will be only 3 units on every Saturday.
• While teaching practical aspect of the matter, in every period the Resource
Persons will teach only for ½ hour and remaining ½ hour will be utilized in the
interaction.
• As far as possible whatever we are referring to, we must show the same to the
TJOS like summons, bailable warrants, endorsements of Ahlmad, Jamabandi,
Girdawari, Challans, Plaints, Written Statements.
• During practical and theoretical training during these entire periods, the
emphasis would be on journey of a Judicial File beginning from its institution
till its final disposal and final consignment to the record room.
• The intention would always be to discuss the matter with the practical aspect
in view.
• Resource Persons will get in touch with the Ahlmads to arrange actual matters
pending before the Court and then he/she will handover copies thereof to the
Trainee Judicial Officers and will discuss.
• We will ensure that whenever we talk about a Statute, we ensure that all the
Trainee Judicial Officers know as to what objective is required to be achieved
by that Statute.
• While talking about the jurisdiction of the Civil Court, we talk about the
jurisdiction of Civil Court vis-à-vis the cases where the jurisdiction of Civil Court
is barred.
• Whatever topics we are going to take up with the Trainee Judicial Officers,
we shall first discuss them in the entire faculty.
• We will ensure that Trainee Judicial Officers are not reluctant in interacting in
Hindi/Haryanvi as far as the Trainee Judicial Officers from Haryana are
concerned as well as in Punjabi as far as Trainee Judicial Officers from the
State of Punjab are concerned.
(a) Actual Kachi Peshi will be assigned to the Trainee Judicial Officers; they
shall themselves pass Zimni Orders. They shall do this duty in the fore-
noon session. They will e-mail whatever Zimni orders they have passed.
They shall also e-mail the problems faced by them to the Academy.
Faculty Members will analyse zimni orders they have passed and will also
respond to problems faced and sent by Trainee Judicial Officers.
(b) After lunch, Trainee Judicial Officers will sit with their respective Senior
Colleagues and observe the bail applications and remand requests being
dealt with. TJOs will themselves pass orders separately on remand
requests and on bail applications; then they will e-mail the same to the
Faculty Members who will respond to the same.
(C) Sessions Judges will assign duties to the Trainee Judicial Officers to
record evidence in civil cases.
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR TRAINEE JUDICIAL OFFICERS
• The Civil Judges are to be aware that the procedure is meant to facilitate the
Court to arrive at proper decision.
• It is seen that Civil Judges do not put full signatures on leave applications. Not
appreciable.
TRAINEE JUDICIAL OFFICERS WILL GO THROUGH THIS PART OF SYLLABUS
THEMSELVES AND WOULD COME PREPARED WHILE ATTENDING THE CLASSES.
CIVIL
Frame of suits. (Or. II CPC along with relevant High Court Rules)
Pleadings in general. ((Or. VI CPC along with relevant High Court Rules))
Issuance and service of summons. (Sections 27, 32 and Or. 11 CPC along
Ex-parte order/decree. (Or. IX CPC along with relevant High Court Rules)
Law of discovery and Inspection. (Or. XI CPC along with relevant High Court
Rules)
Production impounding and return of documents. (Or. XIII CPC along with
Evidence on commissions.
Grant of adjournments.
Admissions of facts and documents. (Or. X CPC alongwith relevant High Court
Rules)
Withdrawal & adjustment of suits. (Or. XXIII CPC alongwith relevant High
Court Rules)
Suits by indigent person. (Or. XXXIII & Order XLIV CPC along with relevant
High Court Rules)
Attachment before judgment. (Or. XXXVIII CPC along with relevant High Court
Rules)
Law of summary procedure. (Or. XXXVII CPC along with relevant High Court
Rules)
Execution of orders and decrees & its various modes (Section 36-74 order
XXI)
Stay of execution. (Or. XLI CPC along with relevant High Court Rules)
Attachment of property in execution. (Or. XXI CPC along with relevant High
Court Rules)
Sale of property in execution. (Or. XXI CPC along with relevant High Court
Rules)
Suit by or against the Govt. (Section 79-80 and Or. XXVII CPC along with
relevant High Court Rules)
Suits by or against corporations. (Or. XXIX CPC along with relevant High Court
Rules) Suits by or against firms. (Or. XXX CPC along with relevant High Court
Rules)
Suits by or against minor. (Or. XXXII CPC along with relevant High Court Rules)
Suits by or against person of unsound mind.
Suits relating to mortgages. (Or. XXXIV CPC along with relevant High Court
Rules)
Police Custody, Judicial Custody, Transit remand and concept, nature &
implications of compulsive bail. (Section 167 Cr.PC)
Judicial Remand (under section 309(2) of CrPC) How it is different from the
one under section 167 Cr.PC.
Inquest proceedings & Inquiry by Magistrate into cause of death & Inquiry
by Judicial Magistrate in cases of custodial rape or custodial death. (Section
174 -176 Cr.PC)
Trial of warrant cases other than police report under Section 173 of CrPC.
on complaints (Chapter 19 Secs. 244 to 247 Cr.PC and 248 Cr.P.C.etc.)
(Section260-265Cr.PC)
Protest petition in criminal cases. Procedure for trial of a police case and
complaint case arising out of same offence.
(Sec. 173 of CrPC, Section 190 CrPC and Section 210 of the CrPC).
Concept of free legal aid in criminal trial. (Section 304 Cr.P.C.) Examination
of accused during the trial. Implications of non-recording of statement v/s
313 of Cr.P.C. (Section 313 Cr.P.C)
Principles of law regulating the grant of regular bail and anticipatory bail.
(Section 436 to 441 Cr.PC)
Quantum of sentence,
Arrest of persons from foreign states under Extradition Act 1962 & Chapter
VII-A Cr. PC.
Phase - I
Kachi Peshi, Service of Summons, Filing of Replies for appearance by defendants, Framing of
Issues.
Phase –II
Phase – III
Phase – IV
Recording of Judgments
Phase – V
Execution
Phase – VI
Bharat Darshan