The document discusses two case studies:
1) A USA university admission scandal where families were involved but students may not be at fault. Questions discuss whether students should be sanctioned and how to prevent these problems.
2) A pilot prison privatization project with a clear structure and questions. One question is rephrased to ask about the objectives of the privatization and the potential effects of EU alternatives on prisoner numbers.
The document discusses two case studies:
1) A USA university admission scandal where families were involved but students may not be at fault. Questions discuss whether students should be sanctioned and how to prevent these problems.
2) A pilot prison privatization project with a clear structure and questions. One question is rephrased to ask about the objectives of the privatization and the potential effects of EU alternatives on prisoner numbers.
The document discusses two case studies:
1) A USA university admission scandal where families were involved but students may not be at fault. Questions discuss whether students should be sanctioned and how to prevent these problems.
2) A pilot prison privatization project with a clear structure and questions. One question is rephrased to ask about the objectives of the privatization and the potential effects of EU alternatives on prisoner numbers.
Considering this case study with education subject I think a “+” may be that the text offers enough information and details on which you can discuss or answer several questions. From my point of view one “-“ can be represented by its structure, which is not an organized one. Questions: Do you think that students should be sanctioned or expelled because of the situation in which their families are involved? Please argue your answer. What security methods must be implemented by each university in order for these problems to be prevented and university admission to be a fair process?
The pilot project for prison privatization
The next case study with prison privatization has a much better organized structure, is a clear and easy to understand text, and the questions are very clear and based on the information provided in the text. Questions: My question: Do you think that this process of privatization of prisons has only financial consequences or are there other objectives that Senator Cristian Bodea has in mind? For the last question I could rephrase and it would sound like this: Regarding the EU proposal on the use of alternatives, what effect do you think it could have on the number of prisoners, could increase or decrease these numbers? Argue your answer. Nothing else to change or object about this case study, it seems well structured and the questions are some very well thought out.