Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology
‘The President and Fellows of Harvard College
The "Kulturbolschewiken" I: Fluxus, the Abolition of Art, the Soviet Union, and "Pure
Amusement"
Author(s): Cuauhtémoc Medina
Source: RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics, No. 48, Permanent/Impermanent (Autumn,
2005), pp. 179-192
Published by: The President and Fellows of Harvard College acting through the Peabody
Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology
Stable URL: http://www jstor.org/stable/20167686
Accessed: 29-05-2016 15:03 UTC
Your use ofthe JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance ofthe Terms & Conditions of Use, avaiable at
higp/about stor orgterms
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, end students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in rusted
digital archive, We use information technology and lool (o inerease productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information sbout
ISTOR, please c
ct support@jstor.org.
Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology. The President and Fellows of
Harvard College are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to RES:
Anthropology and Aestheties
his content downloaded fom 129.105.215.146 on Sun, 29 May 2016 15:03:39 UTC
“Al use subjee to ht idbout jor rgternsThe “Kulturbolschewiken” |
Fluxus, the abolition of art, the Soviet Union, and
“pure amusement”
(CUAUHTEMOC MEDINA
The secret revolutionary project
‘One ofthe most telling paradoxes of the history of
Fluxus is that at the precise moment that the concept of
the avant-garde was put into question by critics and
artis in the early 194, Ganrge Maciunae (the
polemical “Fluxus leader’) reached the conclusion that
it was finally possible to apply Dada’s attack against the
institution of art tothe Soviet project.
The way anti-art was going to contribute, in George
‘Maciunas’ mind, tothe victory of Socialism has never
been entiely revealed in the diferent studies of the
group. This isin part due to the secrecy of Maciunas’
activities. Under the dark spell of the Cold War era, and
ater having had a few bruises with the FB at the
beginning of the 1960s Maciunas always Kept his
ultimate political intentions locked in his heart.
However, there are enough traces of his plans to
[propose a reconstruction. At times it seemed as if he in
fact was testing his collaborators to find those who
would be ideologically prepared to join the secret. For
instance, inthe letter he sent to Emmet Williams in June
1963 he tried to snare his friend to support the idea of
relating Fluxus to the Communist Party. advancing the
argument that if Dada had been only a transient
phenomenon, it was because it had lacked a clear
political commitment:
Emmet: | must know how you feel about involving Fluxus
politically with the party (you know which one). Our
activities loose (sic) all significance if divorced from socio-
political struggle going on now: We must coordinate our
This isthe fist installment ofa two-part essay; he second pat
“The “Kalubolschewiken I: Hanus, Khusches, and the “concretist
society” will appear in RES 48 2006. A previous ance by this author
on "Architecture and efficiency: George Maciunas andthe economy of
Sf appeared n RES #5 Spring 2008
1 See Mate Calinescu, Fve Faces of Modernity. Modernism.
‘Avant Garde. Decadence. Kitch. Postmodernism. (Ducham: Duke
University Pres, 19871, pp. 120-125,
‘This content doymlosdd from 129 105.215
activities or we shall become another ‘new wave,” another
dada club, coming and going?
We also know that, faithful to an old leftist tradition,
‘Maciunas understood Fluxus’s function in the two
regimes under entirely diferent light. This surfaced. in
fact, in one of the biggest deceptions the leader suffered
atthe hands of his associates
In the summer of 1964, Dutch Fluxus artist Eric
‘Andersen traveled to East Europe and the U.S.S.R. Along
the way, he decided to play a ciuel joke on the Fluxus
leader. He sent Maciunas several postcards and letters
making him believe that in the company of Addi
Kopcke, Tomas Schmit, and Emmet Williams, he was
doing a Fluxus tour in Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary,
and Russia. His account was grossly exaggerate:
‘According to him the Fluxus concerts in the Socialist
‘countries were attracting thousands of spectators.
‘Andersen claimed that they were provocatively
perfoning pieces like Maciunas’s Homage (o Adriano
Olivett by drinking, eating, and pissing, and therefore
‘were creating a “succes de scandale” in Moscow's
newspapers. He went so far as to boast thatthe
authorities had decided to probibit the press from even
mentioning ther festival in Leningrad.
‘Maciunas was shocked. To Emmet Williams's
puzzlement, who was entirely ignorant of the hoax, he
wrote an angry letter to the four artists expelling them
from the group, explaining that he had been forced to
denounce their “apostasy” to the Soviet press. Infact,
Maciunas issued a press release reproving the “four
renegades and impostors" for having deliberately
performed Fluxus compositions “in the most scoundrelly
Isic] and scandalous way.” Maciunas stated further that
2. George Macunas Leter to Emmet Wiliams, June 1963. In
Emmet Willams and Ann Node), Mr Fluxus A collective potait
(oF George Maciunas 1451-1978 (London: IRames and Hudson, 197),
p. 102,
3. See the exchange of eters and Andersen and Willams’
recollections ofthe event in id pp. 110-113,
46 09 San, 29 May 2016 15:08:39 UTC
“Allus ubjct to htplaboat ste orgtsas180. RES 48 AUTUMN 2005
Fluxus was in “full agreement with the criticism and