You are on page 1of 7

JCTXXX10.

1177/2380084419894576JDR Clinical & TranslationalImpact of Oral Problems on the Social Behavior of Preschoolers
research-article2019

Vol. XX • Issue X Impact of Oral Problems on the Social Behavior of Preschoolers

Original Report: Epidemiologic Research

Self-Perceptions of the Impact of


Oral Problems on the Social Behavior
of Preschoolers
M.F. Perazzo1 , M.C. Gomes2, É.T.B. Neves2, R.T. Firmino1 , A.A. Barros2, L.C. Silva2, C.C. Martins1,
S.M. Paiva1, and A.F. Granville-Garcia2

Abstract: Introduction: Investigating the children for the determination of problems exerted an impact on the
preschool children’s social behaviors dental caries, traumatic dental injury social behavior of the preschoolers
and the association with oral health (TDI), malocclusion, and bruxism. analyzed, such as playing, sleeping,
variables helps to understand child Descriptive and Poisson regression and smiling.
development. Besides that, different analysis for complex samples with
Knowledge Transfer Statement: The
perceptions need to be explored robust variance was used to test the
results of the present study may help
regarding the impact of oral problems associations (α = 5%).
parents and clinicians to understand
on the social behavior between the Results: The variables associated better the association of oral problems with
child’s self-report and parent’s/ with difficulty sleeping were low the social behavior of preschool children.
caregiver’s proxy report. household income (confidence interval Moreover, this study shows the importance
Objective: To determine which [CI]: 1.40–3.01), number of untreated of listening to children in clinical
socioeconomic and oral factors are dental caries (CI, 1.02–1.04), dental decisions. These results also can help in the
associated with difficulty sleeping and pain (CI, 1.76–3.59), TDI (CI, 1.08– elaboration of oral health policies.
playing and the avoidance of smiling 2.11), and anterior open bite (CI,
Keywords: play and playthings, pre-
in preschoolers. 1.11–2.20). Difficulty playing also
school child, quality of life, sleep, smil-
was associated with the low household
Methods: A cross-sectional study ing, psychometrics
income (CI, 1.34–3.15), number of
was conducted with a representative
untreated dental caries (CI, 1.01–
random sample of 769 pairs of parents/ Introduction
1.04), dental pain (CI,1.42–3.61),
caregivers and 5-y-old preschoolers.
and TDI (CI, 1.13–2.33). The number
The preschoolers answered a Child development is a gradual
of untreated dental caries (CI, 1.02–
questionnaire on difficulty sleeping, unfolding of biologically determined
1.05), dental pain (CI, 1.03–2.88),
difficulty playing, and the avoidance characteristics that arise as a child
anterior open bite (CI, 1.30–3.26), and
of smiling for reasons related to oral learns from experience (Pem 2015).
not using dental services (CI, 1.13–
problems. The parents/caregivers Good development in childhood could
2.73) were determinant factors for the
answered a questionnaire addressing mean healthier adulthood in terms
avoidance of smiling.
socioeconomic characteristics as of better social, economic, physical,
well as the use of dental services. Conclusion: Socioeconomic, and cognitive aspects (Blair and Raver
Two calibrated dentists examined symptomatic, and/or oral esthetic 2012; Pem 2015). Factors that exert a

DOI: 10.1177/2380084419894576. 1Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil; 2Postgraduate
Program in Dentistry, State University of Paraíba (UEPB), Campina Grande, Paraíba, Brazil. Corresponding author: A.F. Granville-Garcia, Postgraduate Program in Dentistry,
State University of Paraíba (UEPB), 351 Rua Baraúnas, Bairro Universitário, Campina Grande, 58429-500, Paraíba, Brazil. Email: anaflaviagg@gmail.com.

© International & American Associations for Dental Research 2019

1
JDR Clinical & Translational Research Month 2019

negative impact on sleeping, playing, Research Ethics Committee of the State orthodontic treatment were excluded
and smiling can affect the development University of Paraiba, Brazil (certificate from the study.
of preschoolers since these behaviors number: 38937714.0.0000.5187), and
have physiological and social importance was conducted following the norms Training, Calibration
(Abanto et al. 2014; Perazzo et al. 2017). of the Strengthening the Reporting of Exercise, and Pilot Study
A healthy smile and playing are important Observational Studies in Epidemiology The training and calibration exercise
components of self-esteem and interpersonal (STROBE) statement. A preschool-based was divided into 2 steps: theoretical
relationships (Bönecker et al. 2012), cross-sectional study was conducted and clinical. In the first step, an
while sleep affects aspects of with a sample of 769 pairs of parents/ expert (pediatric dentist) discussed
neurobehavioral functioning (Maski caregivers and 5-y-old preschoolers the criteria for the diagnosis of dental
and Kothare 2013). enrolled at preschools between caries, traumatic dental injuries, and
Oral problems can exert an impact August and December 2015 in a city malocclusion. In the second step,
on aspects of daily living and the in northeastern Brazil. This city has an 2 dentists and the expert examined
development of preschoolers (Bönecker average income of US$110 per capita per 40 children in a randomly selected
et al. 2012; Clementino et al. 2015). month, a Human Development Index preschool. These participants were
Perceptions regarding the impact of of 0.72, and a poverty rate of 58.88% not included in the main sample.
oral problems on the social behavior of (Brazilian Institute of Geography and Interexaminer kappa coefficients were
preschoolers can differ between a child’s Statistics 2018). 0.80 to 0.90 for dental caries, 0.88 to
self-report and a parent’s/caregiver’s The sample was selected using 0.90 for traumatic dental injury, and
proxy report (Fernandes et al. 2015; a 2-stage strategy to ensure 0.86 to 0.91 for malocclusion. After a
Perazzo et al. 2017). As young children representativeness. In the first stage, 7-d interval, a second examination of
are dependent on others for their health 20 public preschools and 28 private the same children was performed for
care needs, an inadequate perception on preschools were randomly selected the determination of intraexaminer
the part of parents/caregivers can lead to among 263 preschools in the 6 agreement (kappa = 0.87–1.00 for dental
delays in seeking dental/psychological administrative districts of the city. In the caries, 0.82–0.87 for traumatic dental
treatment (da Silva et al. 2011). second stage, pairs of parents/caregivers injury, and 0.94–1.00 for malocclusion).
Understanding a child’s self-perception and children were randomly selected A pilot study was conducted to test the
may help clarify the negative impact that from each preschool. For the calculation nonclinical and clinical data collection
oral problems have on aspects of daily of the sample size, a 50% prevalence rate methods. The participants in the pilot
living, especially in a phase when time is of the outcome was employed to provide study (n = 45) were not included in the
divided between parents/caregivers and the largest possible number of subjects main sample. Based on the results of this
preschool (Pahel et al. 2007; Fernandes and enhance the statistical power of the step, no changes to the data collection
et al. 2015; Perazzo et al. 2017). To our study (Browner et al. 2007). Assuming process were deemed necessary.
knowledge, no previous studies have a 5% margin of error, a 95% confidence
evaluated the effect of problems on level, and a correction factor of 1.6 Nonclinical Data Collection
aspects of daily living, such as sleeping, to compensate for the design effect,
Items were used to evaluate the
playing, and smiling, using the reports of the sample size was estimated at 615
children’s self-perceptions regarding the
5-y-old children. Therefore, the purpose preschoolers, to which 20% was added
impact of oral problems on sleeping
of the present study was to determine if to compensate for possible dropouts,
(has it ever been hard for you to sleep
sociodemographic, economic, and oral leading to a total of 769 children aged
because of your teeth?), playing (has it
factors could be associated with difficulty 5 y. All parents/caregivers received
ever been hard for you to play because
sleeping, difficulty playing, and the clarifications regarding the objectives
of your teeth?), and the avoidance
avoidance of smiling in a randomly selected of the study and were invited to sign a
of smiling (have you ever not smiled
sample of preschoolers. The alternative statement of informed consent.
because of how your teeth look?). Three
hypothesis is that these independents
Eligibility Criteria response options were offered (no =
variables have a negative impact on the
0, a little = 1, a lot = 2) aided by an
social behavior of preschoolers. The inclusion criteria were 5-y-old explanation card with corresponding
children with no systematic diseases faces (Tsakos et al. 2012; Abanto et al.
Methods (based on parents’ reports) enrolled 2013). The following socioeconomic
at preschools. The parents/caregivers characteristics were also collected: child’s
Sample Characteristics
needed to be fluent in Brazilian gender, parent’s/caregiver’s age, monthly
This study was developed following Portuguese and spend at least 12 h household income (categorized based on
the Declaration of Helsinki and per day with the child. Children with the median, which was equal to US$280),
received approval from the Human permanent teeth and/or a history of and the use of dental services.

2
Vol. XX • Issue X Impact of Oral Problems on the Social Behavior of Preschoolers

Clinical Data Collection performed considering the design effect household income (prevalence ratio
and sample selection weights. The [PR] = 2.05; 95% confidence interval [CI],
The children’s teeth were brushed
analysis was employed to correlate the 1.40–3.01), number of untreated dental
to remove plaque and facilitate the
score of each dependent variable (impact caries (PR = 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02–1.04),
diagnosis. Oral examinations were
of oral problems on playing, sleeping, dental pain (PR = 2.51; 95% CI, 1.76–
performed in the knee-to-knee position
and smiling) and the independent 3.59), traumatic dental injury (PR = 1.51;
with the aid of a portable lamp attached
variables (nonclinical and clinical data). 95% CI, 1.08–2.11), and anterior open
to the examiner’s head (Petzl Zoom
The stepwise backward procedure bite (PR = 1.56; 95% CI, 1.11–2.20).
headlamp; Petzl America). The dentists
was used for the selection of variables The variables associated with difficulty
used individual protection equipment,
with a P value <0.20 in the bivariate playing were low household income
a sterilized mouth mirror (PRISMA),
analysis as well as variables considered (PR = 2.05; 95% CI, 1.34–3.15), number
sterilized Williams probe (WHO-621,
epidemiological determinants. Variables of untreated dental caries (PR = 1.03;
Trinity; Campo Mourão), and gauze to
with a P value <0.05 in the adjusted 95% CI, 1.01–1.04), dental pain (PR =
dry the teeth.
analysis were maintained in the final 2.26; 95% CI, 1.42–3.61), and traumatic
Dental caries was diagnosed using
regression model. The goodness of dental injury (PR = 1.62; 95% CI, 1.13–
the International Caries Detection and
fit of the final regression models was 2.33). The avoidance of smiling was
Assessment System (ICDAS-II), which
evaluated by the Akaike’s information associated with the number of untreated
is a scoring system ranging from 0
criterion (AIC), finite sample-corrected dental caries (PR = 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02–
(absence of dental caries) to 6 points.
Akaike’s information criterion (AICC), 1.05), dental pain (PR = 1.72; 95% CI,
In the present study, the frequency
and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) 1.03–2.88), anterior open bite (PR = 2.06;
of cavitated carious lesions (code ≥3)
statistics. 95% CI, 1.30–3.26), and not using dental
was investigated (Ismail et al. 2007).
services (PR = 1.75; 95% CI, 1.13–2.73).
Traumatic dental injury was diagnosed
based on the criteria proposed by Results
Andreasen et al. (2007) and recorded Discussion
A total of 769 pairs of preschoolers
as present when any traumatic dental and their parents/caregivers participated This study evaluated factors associated
injury or tooth discoloration was found. in this study. The prevalence of with difficulty sleeping, difficulty playing,
Malocclusion was recorded in the children’s reports of difficulty sleeping, and the avoidance of smiling among
presence of at least 1 of the following difficulty playing, and the avoidance of preschoolers. Current evidence shows
conditions: increased overbite (>2 mm), smiling was 23.3%, 22.1%, and 17.8%, that children aged 4 to 6 y are capable
increased overjet (>2 mm), anterior open respectively. Table 1 displays the clinical of reliably reporting on the more
bite, anterior crossbite, and posterior characteristics of the children as well concrete domains of their general health
crossbite (Foster and Hamilton 1969; as the socioeconomic characteristics of and quality of life (Tsakos et al. 2012;
Grabowski et al. 2007). The diagnosis of the sample. Boys accounted for 52.4% Abanto et al. 2013). Moreover, parents/
sleep bruxism was based on parental/ of the preschoolers. Most parents/ caregivers may have limited knowledge
caregiver reports of the occurrence of caregivers were 31 y of age or older regarding their children’s due to their
tooth grinding during sleep, as proposed (56.1%) and had a monthly household working routine, social life outside
by the American Academy of Sleep income of less than US$280 (50.3%). The the home, and the time the child is at
Medicine for preschoolers (Buysse majority of children had never visited preschool or daycare, making proxy
et al. 2003) and employed in a previous a dentist (56.5%). The frequencies of reports less accurate (Jokovic et al.
study (Serra-Negra et al. 2013). Dental oral problems among the children were 2004). The present findings demonstrate
pain at some time in the life of the child 23.8% for dental pain, 26.9% for sleep the negative impacts of socioeconomic
was investigated through proxy reports bruxism, 52.8% for traumatic dental factors and oral problems on sleeping,
from parents/caregivers. Fluoride varnish injury, 57.7% for malocclusion, and 15.2% playing, and smiling.
was applied to the teeth following the specifically for anterior open bite. The Difficulty sleeping (23.3%) was the
examinations. mean (SD) number of cavitated carious most reported negative impact by the
lesions among the preschoolers was 14.6 preschoolers, followed by difficulty
Statistical Analysis
(12.6) (median, 12; range, 66). playing (22.1%) and the avoidance
Data organization and statistical Table 2 displays the results of the of smiling (17.8%). The factors
analysis were performed using the Poisson regression analyses for difficulty associated with these negative impacts
Statistical Package for Social Sciences sleeping, difficulty playing, and the varied mainly in terms of economic,
(SPSS for Windows, version 25.0; SPSS, avoidance of smiling. In the adjusted symptomatic, and esthetic aspects.
Inc.). Poisson regression with robust model, the variables associated with Socioeconomic status affects oral
variance for complex samples was difficulty sleeping were low monthly conditions that are closely associated

3
JDR Clinical & Translational Research Month 2019

Table 1. associations found between the number


Characterization of Sample. of untreated dental caries and traumatic
dental injury and both difficulty sleeping
Frequency and playing. However, a previous study
Variable n % involving the analysis of proxy reports
from parents/caregivers found that dental
Child’s sex caries exerted no impact on playing
 Female 366 47.6 (Abanto et al. 2014). It is likely that the
concerns of parents/caregivers are rather
 Male 403 52.4 different from those of their preschool
children and are focused more on other
Parent’s/caregiver’s age, y
functional aspects of daily living (Abanto
  <31 323 43.9 et al. 2014; Fernandes et al. 2015). Such
differences underscore the importance of
  ≥31 413 56.1
considering both children’s and parental
Monthly household income reports in studies involving preschoolers
(Abanto et al. 2015; Perazzo et al. 2017).
  ≤US$280 370 50.3
For a long time, it was believed
  >US$280 365 49.7 that most esthetic oral factors were
not an important aspect of the lives
Use of dental services of preschoolers (Tsakos et al. 2012).
 Yes 334 43.5 However, children’s reports of social
behavior have proved otherwise (Abanto
 No 434 56.5
et al. 2013; Granville-Garcia
Dental pain et al. 2016; Perazzo et al. 2017). Anterior
open bite can affect oral esthetics and
 Yes 180 23.8 was associated with difficulty sleeping
 No 576 76.2 and avoiding smiling. Functional
limitations related to anterior open
Sleep bruxism bite, such as pronouncing words,
 Yes 205 26.9
also could contribute to this negative
impact (Ramos-Jorge et al. 2015). A
 No 556 73.1 similar justification can be attributed to
the association between the number
Traumatic dental injury
of untreated dental caries and social
 Yes 406 52.8 aspects. Besides the functional limitation
caused mainly by dental pain, there is
 No 363 47.2
a negative impact on esthetics when
Malocclusion carious lesions are located on anterior
teeth (Clementino et al. 2015; Perazzo
 Yes 443 57.7
et al. 2017). Sleep bruxism was not
 No 325 42.3 associated with a negative impact,
probably because it was not severe
Anterior open bite enough to cause aesthetic problems or
 Yes 116 15.2 pain (Perazzo et al. 2017).
Parents/caregivers play an important
 No 648 84.8 role in seeking dental care for the oral
Mean (SD) Median (Range) conditions of their children (Granville-
Garcia et al. 2015; Perazzo et al. 2016).
Untreated dental caries 14.6 (12.6) 12 (66) Children who failed to use dental
services were more likely to avoid
with a negative impact on social Perazzo et al. 2017). In the present smiling. Not visiting the dentist regularly
behavior, especially when the problem study, the probable dental pain caused may increase children’s susceptibility to
is symptomatic (Abanto et al. 2014; by oral problems could explain the oral problems and their consequences

4
Vol. XX • Issue X Impact of Oral Problems on the Social Behavior of Preschoolers

Table 2.
Poisson Regression Analyses of Independent Variables Associated with Difficulty Sleeping, Difficulty Playing, and Avoiding Smiling in
5-y-Old Children.

Difficulty Sleeping Difficulty Playing Avoidance of Smiling


PR Adjusted PR Adjusted PR Adjusted
Variables Mean (SD) (95% CI)a Mean (SD) (95% CI)b Mean (SD) (95% CI)c
Child’s sex
 Female 0.3 (0.6) 0.3 (0.6) 0.2 (0.5)

 Male 0.3 (0.6) 0.3 (0.7) 0.3 (0.6)

Parent’s/caregiver’s age, y
 <31 0.3 (0.6) 0.3 (0.6) 0.3 (0.6)

  ≥31 0.3 (0.7) 0.3 (0.6) 0.2 (0.6)

Monthly household income


 >US$280 0.2 (0.5) 1.00 0.2 (0.5) 1.00 0.2 (0.5) 1.00

  ≤US$280 0.4 (0.7) 2.05 (1.40–3.01) 0.4 (0.7) 2.05 (1.34–3.15) 0.3 (0.6) 1.60 (0.98–2.62)

Number of untreated 1.03 (1.02–1.04) 1.03 (1.01–1.04) 1.03 (1.02–1.05)


  dental caries
Dental pain
 Yes 0.6 (0.8) 2.51 (1.76–3.59) 0.5 (0.8) 2.26 (1.42–3.61) 0.4 (0.7) 1.72 (1.03–2.88)

 No 0.2 (0.6) 1.00 0.3 (0.6) 1.00 0.2 (0.5) 1.00

Sleep bruxism
 Yes 0.3 (0.6) 1.00 0.3 (0.6) 0.74 (0.46–1.20) 0.2 (0.5)

 No 0.4 (0.7) 1.49 (1.00–2.24) 0.3 (0.7) 1.00 0.3 (0.6)

Traumatic dental injury


 Yes 0.4 (0.7) 1.51 (1.08–2.11) 0.4 (0.7) 1.62 (1.13–2.33) 0.2 (0.5) 1.00

 No 0.3 (0.6) 1.00 0.3 (0.6) 1.00 0.2 (0.6) 0.85 (0.55–1.30)

Malocclusion
 Yes 0.3 (0.6) 0.33 (0.65) 0.3 (0.6)

 No 0.3 (0.7) 0.29 (0.61) 0.2 (0.5)

Anterior open bite


 No 0.3 (0.6) 1.00 0.3 (0.6) 1.00 0.2 (0.5) 1.00

 Yes 0.5 (0.8) 1.56 (1.11–2.20) 0.5 (0.7) 1.44 (0.96–2.17) 0.4 (0.7) 2.06 (1.30–3.26)

Use of dental services


 Yes 0.3 (0.6) 0.3 (0.6) 0.2 (0.5) 1.00

 No 0.3 (0.7) 0.3 (0.7) 0.3 (0.6) 1.75 (1.13–2.73)

PR, prevalence ratio.


a
Variables incorporated into multivariate model (P < 0.20): monthly household income, number of untreated dental caries, dental pain, sleep bruxism, traumatic
dental injury, and anterior open bite. Model fit: Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) = 18,380.463; finite sample-corrected Akaike’s information criterion (AICC) =
18,380.622; Bayesian information criterion (BIC) = 18,412.450.
b
Variables incorporated into multivariate model (P < 0.20): monthly household income, number of untreated dental caries, dental pain, sleep bruxism, traumatic
dental injury, and anterior open bite. Model fit: AIC = 19,567.400; AICC = 19,567.559; BIC = 19,599.386.
c
Variables incorporated into multivariate model (P < 0.20): monthly household income, number of untreated dental caries, dental pain, traumatic dental injury,
anterior open bite, and use of dental services. Model fit: AIC = 15,361.968; AICC = 15,362.126; BIC = 15,393.994.

5
JDR Clinical & Translational Research Month 2019

due to reduced access to oral health Garcia, contributed to conception, Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics.
preventive strategies. Furthermore, dental design, data analysis, and interpretation, 2018. Paraíba: Campina Grande. [accessed
pain was also associated with avoiding drafted and critically revised the 2019 Nov. 22]. https://cidades.ibge.gov.br/
brasil/pb/campina-grande/panorama.
smiling, contributing to explain the manuscript. All authors gave final
association between lack of use of dental approval and agree to be accountable for Browner W, Newman T, Hulley S. 2007.
Estimating sample size and power:
services and avoiding smiling. However, all aspects of the work.
applications and examples. In: Designing
no association was found between the clinical research. 3rd ed. Philadelphia:
other aspects of the child’s daily living Acknowledgments
Lippincott and Williams & Wilkins. p. 65–94.
evaluated and the use of dental services This study was supported by Paraíba Buysse DJ, Young T, Edinger JD, Carroll J,
in this study. State University, State of Minas Gerais Kotagal S. 2003. Clinicians’ use of the
The present investigation has the Research Foundation (FAPEMIG), International Classification of Sleep
limitations inherent to cross-sectional Brazilian Coordination for the Disorders: results of a national survey. Sleep.
studies using questionnaires, such as Improvement of Higher Education 26(1):48–51.
memory bias. However, a pilot study Personnel (CAPES)/Ministry of Education, Clementino MA, Gomes MC, Pinto-Sarmento
was executed to diminish possible biases and the National Council for Scientific TC de A, Martins CC, Granville-Garcia AF,
in the study. The items on difficulty and Technological Development (CNPq). Paiva SM. 2015. Perceived impact of dental
sleeping, difficulty playing, and the The authors declare no potential conflicts pain on the quality of life of preschool
children and their families. PLoS One.
avoidance of smiling have appropriate of interest with respect to the authorship 10(6):e0130602.
psychometrics proprieties to be used and/or publication of this article.
da Silva AN, Mendonça MH, Vettore MV. 2011.
in studies evaluating the reports of
preschoolers (Abanto et al. 2013). ORCID iDs The association between low-socioeconomic
status mother’s Sense of Coherence and their
Moreover, Poisson regression analysis M.F. Perazzo https://orcid.org/0000 child’s utilization of dental care. Community
may have led to overdispersion of data, -0003-1231-689X Dent Oral Epidemiol. 39(2):115–126.
which is another limitation of the study. R.T. Firmino https://orcid.org/0000 Fernandes IB, Ramos-Jorge J, Ramos-Jorge ML,
Therefore, these findings show the -0001-5581-0658 Bönecker M, Abanto J, Marques LS, Paiva SM.
importance of considering the reports 2015. Correlation and comparative analysis
of preschoolers regarding aspects that References of discriminative validity of the Scale of Oral
involve social behaviors in clinical Abanto J, Tello G, Bonini GC, Oliveira LB, Health Outcomes for Five-Year-Old Children
Murakami C, Bönecker M. 2015. Impact of (SOHO-5) and the Early Childhood Oral
interventions and public health
traumatic dental injuries and malocclusions Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS) for dental
strategies. Parents/caregivers and dentists caries. BMC Oral Health. 15:29.
on quality of life of preschool children: a
should be aware of oral conditions and population-based study. Int J Paediatr Dent. Foster TD, Hamilton MC. 1969. Occlusion in
aspects of the daily lives of children to 25(1):18–28. the primary dentition: study of children at
prevent future negative consequences. Abanto J, Tsakos G, Paiva SM, Carvalho TS, 2 and one-half to 3 years of age. Br Dent J.
Longitudinal studies are needed to clarify Raggio DP, Bönecker M. 2014. Impact of 126(2):76–79.
the relationship of causality and allow dental caries and trauma on quality of life Grabowski R, Stahl F, Gaebel M, Kundt G. 2007.
the establishment of public policies among 5- to 6-year-old children: perceptions Relationship between occlusal findings and
aimed at encouraging early dental care. of parents and children. Community Dent orofacial myofunctional status in primary
Oral Epidemiol. 42(5):385–394. and mixed dentition. Part I: Prevalence
Author Contributions Abanto J, Tsakos G, Paiva SM, Goursand D, of malocclusions. J Orofac Orthop.
M.F. Perazzo, contributed to Raggio DP, Bönecker M. 2013. Cross-cultural 68(1):26–37.
design, data acquisition, analysis, adaptation and psychometric properties of
Granville-Garcia AF, Clementino MA, Gomes
the Brazilian version of the scale of oral
and interpretation, drafted and MC, Costa EM, Pinto-Sarmento TC, Paiva
health outcomes for 5-year-old children
critically revised the manuscript; M.C. SM. 2015. Influence of oral problems and
(SOHO-5). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 11:16.
Gomes, É.T.B. Neves, contributed to biopsychosocial factors on the utilization of
Andreasen J, Andreasen F, Andersson L. 2007. dental services by preschool children. J Dent
conception, data acquisition, analysis, Textbook and color atlas of traumatic injuries Child (Chic). 82(2):76–83.
and interpretation, drafted and critically to the teeth. 4td ed. Copenhagen: Munskgaard.
revised the manuscript; R.T. Firmino, Granville-Garcia AF, Gomes MC, Dantas LR,
Blair C, Raver CC. 2012. Child development Dantas LR, da Silva BR, Perazzo Mde F,
C.C. Martins, contributed to design, data in the context of adversity: experiential Siqueira MB. 2016. Parental influence on
analysis, and interpretation, drafted and canalization of brain and behavior. Am children’s answers to an oral-health-related
critically revised the manuscript; A.A. Psychol. 67(4):309–318. quality of life questionnaire. Braz Oral Res.
Barros, L.C. Silva, contributed to design, Bönecker M, Abanto J, Tello G, Oliveira LB. 30. pii: S1806-83242016000100230.
data acquisition, and interpretation, 2012. Impact of dental caries on preschool Ismail AI, Sohn W, Tellez M, Amaya A, Sen A,
drafted and critically revised the children’s quality of life: an update. Braz Hasson H, Pitts NB. 2007. The International
manuscript; S.M. Paiva, A.F. Granville- Oral Res. 26(Suppl 1):103–107. Caries Detection and Assessment System

6
Vol. XX • Issue X Impact of Oral Problems on the Social Behavior of Preschoolers

(ICDAS): an integrated system for measuring Pem D. 2015. Factors affecting early childhood Ramos-Jorge J, Motta T, Marques LS, Paiva SM,
dental caries. Community Dent Oral growth and development: golden 1000 days. Ramos-Jorge ML. 2015. Association between
Epidemiol. 35(3):170–178. Adv Practice Nurs 1:101. anterior open bite and impact on quality of
Jokovic A, Locker D, Guyatt G. 2004. How life of preschool children. Braz Oral Res.
Perazzo MF, Gomes MC, Neves ÉT, Martins 29:46.
well do parents know their children? CC, Paiva SM, Costa EMM de B, Granville-
Implications for proxy reporting of child Garcia AF. 2017. Oral problems and Serra-Negra JM, Paiva SM, Abreu MH, Flores-
health-related quality of life. Qual Life Res. quality of life of preschool children: Mendoza CE, Pordeus IA. 2013. Relationship
13(7):1297–1307. self-reports of children and perception between tasks performed, personality traits,
Maski KP, Kothare SV. 2013. Sleep deprivation of parents/caregivers. Eur J Oral Sci. and sleep bruxism in Brazilian school
and neurobehavioral functioning in children. 125(4):272–279. children—a population-based cross-sectional
Int J Psychophysiol. 89(2):259–264. study. PLoS One. 8(11):e80075.
Perazzo MF, Gomes MC, Neves ÉT, Martins
Pahel B, Rozier RG, Slade G. 2007. Parental CC, Paiva SM, Granville-Garcia AF. 2016. Tsakos G, Blair YI, Yusuf H, Wright W, Watt RG,
perceptions of children’s oral health: the Oral health-related quality of life and sense Macpherson LMD. 2012. Developing a new
Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale of coherence regarding the use of dental self-reported scale of oral health outcomes
(ECOHIS). Health Qual Life Outcomes. services by preschool children. Int J Paediatr for 5-year-old children (SOHO-5). Health
5:6. Dent. 27(5):334–343. Qual Life Outcomes. 10:62.

You might also like