OCCUPAT Loyalty Loyalty

GENDER AGE
ION Mean Categorised
2 2 2 4.00 1 Ho There is no association between loya
2 2 2 2.50 0 Ha There is association between loyalty
1 2 1 1.83 0
1 2 4 4.50 1 Observed / Actual Data
2 3 4 2.33 0 Loyalty
1 4 5 4.17 1 Age High
1 1 4 3.17 0 Very Young 13
2 1 2 3.33 1 Young 52
2 2 2 3.67 1 Old 12
1 1 2 3.33 1 Very Old 24
2 4 3 3.00 0 101
2 2 4 4.17 1
2 3 3 2.00 0 Expected Data
2 3 3 4.00 1 Age High
1 2 2 4.33 1 Very Young 13.07
2 1 2 4.17 1 Young 53.87
2 4 3 3.00 0 Old 7.13
1 3 3 3.17 0 Very Old 26.93
2 2 5 4.67 1 101
2 2 2 3.50 1
1 2 2 3.67 1 df (r-1)(c-1)
2 4 4 4.00 1 chi test 0.104698675
2 1 2 4.00 1 Sig 0.05
1 1 2 3.00 0
2 2 2 3.33 1 since the sig is greater than 0.05, we accept the nul
1 2 2 3.83 1
2 4 5 3.83 1
2 2 2 3.33 1
1 2 2 3.00 0
2 2 2 4.00 1 ho: There is uniformity in absenteesm
2 1 2 3.00 0 ha: thereis no uniformity in absenesm
2 2 4 3.33 1
Absentees -
2 2 2 3.00 0 Day Actuals
1 1 2 4.00 1 Mon 5
2 3 4 3.33 1 tue 3
2 2 4 3.83 1 wed 2
2 2 5 4.33 1 thur 3
1 4 1 2.83 0 fri 7
2 2 2 4.00 1 20
2 2 4 2.83 0 Expected value = Mean value
2 1 2 4.17 1
1 1 2 3.00 0 pvalue CHITEST
2 2 4 3.00 0 pvalue CHISQ.TEST
2 2 4 3.00 0 df n-1
2 2 4 3.17 0
2 2 5 4.67 1
1 1 2 2.83 0
2 4 5 3.00 0
2 2 4 3.00 0
2 2 4 4.00 1
1 2 4 3.33 1
2 2 2 3.00 0
2 2 4 3.17 0
1 2 4 3.00 0
2 2 2 3.33 1
2 2 4 3.00 0
2 2 2 3.83 1
2 2 2 4.00 1
2 4 4 4.00 1
2 2 4 4.00 1
2 2 4 3.83 1
2 2 4 4.33 1
1 2 2 4.00 1
1 1 2 2.33 0
2 2 2 3.83 1
2 4 4 3.00 0
2 1 4 3.00 0
2 1 2 4.00 1
2 4 3 3.33 1
1 4 1 4.00 1
1 1 2 4.67 1
2 1 4 3.67 1
2 2 4 3.50 1
2 4 5 3.50 1
2 4 5 3.50 1
2 1 2 4.50 1
2 2 2 3.00 0
1 2 2 2.67 0
2 2 5 2.00 0
2 1 4 3.17 0
1 1 2 3.50 1
2 1 2 4.17 1
2 1 4 2.67 0
1 1 2 3.83 1
2 2 4 3.00 0
1 2 2 4.00 1
2 2 2 3.33 1
1 3 4 2.83 0
1 1 4 3.00 0
1 2 2 2.67 0
2 1 2 3.17 0
1 4 1 4.00 1
2 2 4 4.33 1
1 1 4 4.50 1
1 1 2 3.83 1
2 2 2 4.00 1
1 2 4 3.83 1
2 2 3 3.00 0
2 2 4 2.00 0
1 1 2 3.50 1
2 4 4 4.00 1
2 2 2 3.17 0
1 1 2 3.83 1
2 1 2 3.50 1
1 2 2 2.67 0
1 1 2 3.00 0
1 2 4 3.17 0
2 2 4 3.00 0
1 2 2 3.83 1
2 2 2 3.00 0
2 4 4 2.83 0
1 1 2 3.83 1
1 1 2 3.50 1
1 4 1 3.50 1
2 2 2 3.33 1
2 2 2 3.33 1
2 1 2 3.00 0
2 2 4 3.67 1
2 2 2 3.33 1
2 2 2 3.33 1
2 2 4 4.67 1
2 2 2 3.00 0
2 2 4 3.83 1
1 2 2 3.83 1
ere is no association between loyalty and age Sum - AGE Loyalty Categorised
ere is association between loyalty and age AGE 0 1 (empty)
1 13 20
2 52 84
3 12 6
Low Grand Total 4 24 44
20 33 (empty)
84 136 Total Result 101 154
6 18
44 68
154 255

Low Grand Total

19.93 33
82.13 136
10.87 18
41.07 68
154 255

eater than 0.05, we accept the null hypothesis that there is no association between age and loyalty Ho
Ha

ormity in absenteesm ( no diff bet ex and actals )

iformity in absenesm
Observed / Actual Data
Expected
Absentism Gender Vs
4 Male
4 Female
4 Grand Tot
4
4
Expecte Values / Contin
4
Expected Value = (Row
0.40600585
0.40600585 Gender Vs
Male
Female
Grand Tot

Chi Squar

Compare with 0.05

Since the chi square va

 Chi square
test Purpose Association between variables Movie Watching
Movies and trailers Trailer w Yes
Total Result Nominal data /ordinal data Yes 57
33 NO 13
136 There is no association between the loyalty for the product and gender of people
18 There is association between loyalty and gender CONTINGENCY TABLE
68 OBSERVED DATA / ACTUAL DATA
Loyalty
255 Age High
Young 57
Old 13

Sum - GENDER Loyalty Categorised

GENDER 0 1 (empty) Total Result
1 17 25 42
2 64 100 164
(empty)
Total Result 81 125 206

There is no association between the loyalty for the product and gender of people
There is association between loyalty and gender

Observed / Actual Data

Not Loyal Loyal Grand Total

17 25 42
64 100 164
81 125 206

Expecte Values / Contingency Table

Expected Value = (Row total *column total) / grand total

Not Loyal Loyal Grand Total

16.51 25.49 42
64.49 99.51 164
 81 125 206

0.863543015

Compare with 0.05

Since the chi square value is greater than 0.05, we accept the null hypothesis that there is no association betweeen gender and Loy
ovie Watching
No
7
32

INGENCY TABLE Crate an Expected Data

DATA / ACTUAL DATA

Low
7
32
betweeen gender and Loyalty
Actuals Accounting Finance Marketing Total
BA 31 13 16 60
B Ebg 8 16 7 31
BBA 12 10 17 39
Other 10 5 7 22
Total 61 44 47 152

ho: there is no association between the UG degree and the specialisation

ho: the choice of specialisation is independent of UG Degree
Type of test Chisquare test for independence
level of sig 0.05
Expected Value = Row total * Column Total / Grand Total

Expected Valaue Table

Accounting Finance Marketing Total
BA 24.1 17.4 18.6 60
B Ebg 12.4 9.0 9.6 31
BBA 15.7 11.3 12.1 39
Other 8.8 6.4 6.8 22
Total 61 44 47 152

Chi Square p Value 0.02270674

The sig value of Chi Square test is 0.02 , when comparing it with level of significance
of 0.05 , it is clear that the null hypothesis is rejected and the alternate Hypotheis is
accepted. Therefore it can be concluded that the choice of specialisation is
dependent of the students UG Degree. And there is assocaition between the UG
degree and the choice of specialisation.