Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Kazimierz Kukulski
• Large waist circumference — a waistline that measures at least 89 centimeters for women
and 102 centimeters for men
• High triglyceride level — 150 milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL), or 1.7 millimoles per liter
(mmol/L), or higher of this type of fat found in blood
• Reduced high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol — less than 40 mg/dL (1.04 mmol/L)
in men or less than 50 mg/dL (1.3 mmol/L) in women of this "good" cholesterol
Atenuation of wave
propagation is reported
on the left hand side
Wave velocity and
Interquartile Range of
velocities measured is
reported on the right
hand side
F3 F4
F1 F2
© Hitachi Medical Systems Europe 2015. All rights reserved.
© Hitachi Medical Systems Europe 2015. All rights reserved.
SWM: Measurement Result (Vs / IQR / VsN)
Vs Median IQR:
Value interquartile
range
Histogram
analysis VsN: Number
of valid Vs
measurements
0 1 2 3 4 m/s
Higher VsN represents a valid detection of the shear wave propagation velocity.
Lower VsN represents an inaccurate detection due to the propagation across vessels,
hypoechoic regions (shadowing) or body motion.
VsN: 100%
VsN: 16%
Rejection conditions:
Vs less than or equal to zero (1)
Outside a certain defined range of Vs (2): 0.7-4m/s (1.47-48kPa)
When phase fluctuations are observed at a particular depth (3) (fluctuations are mainly generated by
small blood vessels and/or body motion)
(Total # Vs pts measured) – (Rejected # Vs pts)
VsN (%) = X 100
(Total # Vs pts measured)
• Depth dependance
• Minimum 1cm below the capsule not deeper than 5cm
• Frequency dependance
• Higher frequency transducer – higher stifness values
• Region of the liver (left lobe bigger variations)
Ruling-
Fibrosis Stage SWM, kPa in
Ruling-out Ruling-in Ruling-out
(interquartile range) F≥2 F=4 F=4
F≥2
(95% CI) (95% CI) (95% CI)
(95% CI)
Mild/No fibrosis (F0-F1) 4.8 (4.0-5.7)
Cutoff, KPa 6.78 5.55 9.15 8.41
Significant fibrosis (F2) 7.2 (5.7-9.0)
Sensitivity 76.9 90.6 83.3 90.6
Advanced fibrosis (F3) 8.5 (6.7-9.5)
Liver cirrhosis (F4) 14.0 (11-17) Specificity 90.3 72.2 90.1 82.2
18
Steatosis grades according to ATT and CAP
Grade ATT median (95% CAP median (95% CAP median (95%
Cut off confidence level) confidence level) confidence level)
dB/cm/MHz dB/m M-probe dB/m XL-probe
Koizumi Y, Hirooka M, Tamaki N, Yada N, Nakashima O, Izumi N, et al. (2019) New diagnostic technique to evaluate hepatic steatosis using the
attenuation coefficient on ultrasound Bmode. PLoS ONE 14(8): e0221548. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0221548
19
Different methods of Elastography
RTE SWM
*Fujimoto K. et al, Oncology 2013;84(suppl 1):3–12
© Hitachi Medical Systems Europe 2015. All rights reserved.
Model by: KAROUMPALIS IOANNIS M.D
CONSULTANT GASTROENTEROLOGIST
DISTRICT HOSPITAL OF ATHENS “G.GENNIMATAS”
© Hitachi Medical Systems Europe 2015. All rights reserved.
Methodology of RTE in LF evaluation
Frame 1 Frame 2
Before Compression Under Compression
Frame 1 Frame 2 Large strain → soft
F1 F2 F3 F4
F1 F2 F3 F4
convex
transducer
Automatic
compression
of liver from
the heart beat
LF Index = 1.23 LF Index = 2.15 LF Index = 3.07 LF Index = 3.83
RTE
30
F index, A index
31
Yada N, et al: Diagnosis of Fibrosis and Activity by a Combined Use of Strain and Shear Wave Imaging in Patients with Liver
Disease. Digestive Diseases 2017; 35(6): 515-520. doi: 10.1159/000480140.
32
© Hitachi Medical Systems Europe 2015. All rights reserved.
© Hitachi Medical Systems Europe 2015. All rights reserved.