Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Peg May01 Fmaf
Peg May01 Fmaf
Objective test questions are awarded 2 marks each. Explanations are provided for
answers to objective test questions involving calculations.
Question 1.1
XYZ Ltd operates an integrated accounting system. The material control account at 31 March
2001 shows the following information:
The £125,000 credit entry represents the value of the transfer to the
The answer is D.
Question 1.2
P Ltd is preparing the production budget for the next period. Based on previous experience, it
has found that there is a linear relationship between production volume and production costs.
The following cost information has been collected in connection with production:
Volume Cost
(units) £
1,600 23,200
2,500 25,000
What would be the production cost for a production volume of 2,700 units?
The answer is B.
Units £
2,500 25,000
1,600 23,200
900 1,800
£1,800
Variable cost per unit = = £2
900
Question 1.3
ABC Ltd absorbs fixed production overheads in one of its departments on the basis of
machine hours. There were 100,000 budgeted machine hours for the forthcoming period. The
fixed production overhead absorption rate was £2∙50 per machine hour.
The answer is B.
Workings
£
110,000 machine hours x £2∙50 275,000 absorbed
Actual incurred 300,000
Under absorbed 25,000
£
Profit
0
Level of activity
Question 1.4
A semi-variable cost.
B total cost.
C variable cost.
D fixed cost.
The answer is D.
Question 1.5
The answer is D.
PP Ltd makes one product, which passes through a single process. The details of the
process for period 2 were as follows:
Material £49,000
Labour £23,000
Production overheads £3,800
During the period, 900 units were added to the process, and the following costs occurred:
There were 500 units of closing work-in-progress, which were 100% complete for material,
90% complete for labour and 40% complete for overheads. No losses were incurred in the
process.
Question 1.6
How many equivalent units are used when calculating the cost per unit in relation to labour?
The answer is C.
Question 1.7
The answer is D.
£ £ £
Costs – Period 198,000 139,500 79,200
OWIP 49,000 23,000 3,800
Total cost 247,000 162,500 83,000
Question 1.8
An engineering company has been offered the opportunity to bid for a contract which requires
a special component. Currently, the company has a component in stock, which has a net
book value of £250. This component could be used in the contract, but would require
modification at a cost of £50. There is no other foreseeable use for the component held in
stock. Alternatively, the company could purchase a new specialist component for £280.
What is the relevant cost of using the component currently held in stock for this contract?
The answer is A.
Workings
The £250 net book value is a sunk cost and therefore not relevant. Therefore the relevant
cost is £50.
A company has budgeted to produce and sell 6,000 units of a single product. The standard
cost per unit was as follows:
In the period covered by the budget, the following actual results were recorded:
Question 1.9
A £2,000 favourable.
B £2,000 adverse.
C £7,000 favourable.
D £7,000 adverse.
The answer is A.
Workings
Question 1.10
A £2,000 favourable.
B £2,000 adverse.
C £5,000 favourable.
D £5,000 adverse.
The answer is C.
Workings
Question 1.11
The following details have been extracted from the debtor collection records of X Limited:
June £100,000
July £150,000
August £130,000
Customers paying in the month after sale are entitled to deduct a 2% settlement discount.
Invoices are issued on the last day of the month. The amount budgeted to be received in
September 2001 from credit sales is
The answer is C.
Workings
Question 1.12
In a standard cost bookkeeping system, when the actual hourly rate paid for labour is less
than the standard hourly rate, the double entry to record this is
The answer is A.
Question 1.13
0 Output
The answer is A.
Question 1.14
X Ltd produces and sells a single product, which has a contribution to sales ratio of 30%.
Fixed costs amount to £120,000 each year.
A is 156,000.
B is 171,428.
C is 400,000.
D cannot be calculated from the data supplied.
The answer is D.
Workings
£120,000
Breakeven point in terms of sales value = = £400,000
0.3
The breakeven point in terms of units cannot be derived because we do not know the unit
selling price.
Question 1.15
P Ltd had an opening stock value of £2,640 (300 units valued at £8∙80 each) on 1 April. The
following receipts and issues were recorded during April:
Using the LIFO method, what was the total value of the issues on 29 April?
The answer is B.
Workings
Question 1.16
The answer is D.
Workings
Maximum stock level = Reorder level (ROL) + EOQ – (Minimum rate of usage x
minimum lead time)
Question 1.17
A company has been asked to quote for a job. The company aims to make a net profit of 30%
on sales. The estimated cost for the job is as follows:
Fixed production overheads for the company are budgeted to be £100,000 each year
and are recovered on the basis of labour hours. There are 10,000 budgeted labour
hours each year.
Other costs in relation to selling, distribution and administration are recovered at the
rate of £50 per job.
The answer is C.
Workings
£100,000 overheads
* = £10 per hour
10,000 hours
Question 1.18
A the budgeted profit and loss account, budgeted balance sheet and budgeted cash
flow.
B the budgeted profit and loss account and budgeted balance sheet.
C the budgeted profit and loss account.
D the budgeted cash flow.
The answer is A.
Question 1.19
RJD Ltd produces a single product. The managers currently use absorption costing, but are
considering using marginal costing in future.
The fixed production overhead absorption rate is £68 per unit. There were 200 units of
opening stock for the period and 360 units of closing stock.
If marginal costing principles were applied, the profit for the period compared to the
absorption costing profit would be
A £6,800 lower.
B £10,880 lower.
C £10,880 higher.
D £24,880 lower.
The answer is B.
Workings
Under marginal costing the profit will be £10,880 lower than the absorption costing profit.
Question 1.20
A company is launching a new product. In order to manufacture this new product, two types
of labour are required – skilled and semi-skilled. The new product requires 5 hours of skilled
labour and 5 hours of semi-skilled labour.
A skilled employee is available and is currently paid £10 per hour. A replacement would,
however, have to be obtained at a rate of £9 per hour, for the work which would otherwise be
done by the skilled employee. The current rate for semi-skilled workers is £5 per hour and an
additional employee would be appointed for this work.
The relevant cost of labour to be used in making one unit of the new product would be
The answer is B.
Workings
£
Skilled labour replacement 5 hours x £9 45
Semi-skilled labour 5 hours x £5 25
Relevant cost 70
Question 1.21
The answer is B.
Question 1.22
A company is currently preparing a material usage budget for the forthcoming year for
material Z that will be used in product XX. The production director has confirmed that the
production budget for product XX will be 10,000 units.
Each unit of product XX requires 4 kgs of material Z. Opening stock of material Z is budgeted
to be 3,000 kgs and the company wishes to reduce stock at the end of the year by 25%.
What is the usage budget for material Z for the forthcoming year?
The answer is C.
Workings
Question 1.23
A (i) only. B (i) and (ii) only. C (i) and (iii) only. D All of them.
The answer is A.
Question 1.24
A flexible budget is
B a budget for a defined period of time which includes planned revenues, expenses,
assets, liabilities and cash flow.
C a budget which is prepared for a period of one year which is reviewed monthly,
whereby each time actual results are reported, a further forecast period is added and
the intermediate period forecasts are updated.
The answer is A.
Question 1.25
A (i) only. B (ii) only. C (i) and (ii) only. D All of them.
The answer is C.
Question 2
(a) Calculate the production plan that will maximise profit for the year ending 31 May 2002.
(7 marks)
(b) Based on the production plan you have recommended in part (a), present a profit
statement for the year ending 31 May 2002 in a marginal costing format. (9 marks)
(c) Discuss two problems that may arise as a result of your recommended production plan.
(4 marks)
(d) Explain why the contribution concept is used in limiting factor decisions.
(5 marks)
Total marks = 25
Rationale
The question examines the application of marginal costing in a limiting factor decision-making
situation. It is designed to encompass as many aspects as possible within this area. It is
important that candidates have a good understanding of this topic as it forms the basis of the
underpinning knowledge required for decision making at the Intermediate level.
In part (a), candidates are asked to calculate the optimum production plan as a result of the
limiting factor and then in part (b) to calculate the profit derived from this plan. In part (c),
candidates are then asked to discuss two problems which may arise as a result of the
company not being in a position to fully satisfy demand. Part (d) of the question then asks
candidates to comment on why the contribution concept is used in limiting factor decisions.
Parts (c) and (d) require candidates to adopt a critical approach by asking them to discuss/
comment on the methods and techniques used and any problems arising as a result of the
limiting factor.
Suggested Approach
Part (a)
• Identify the limiting factor.
• Calculate the contribution per unit.
• Calculate the contribution per unit of limiting factor.
• Rank the products in the order that maximises contribution per unit of limiting factor.
• Allocate scarce resources according to the ranking.
• Devise the production plan.
Part (b)
• Calculate the profit generated by the plan using marginal costing principles.
Examiner’s Comments
This question examined the application of marginal costing in a limiting factor decision -
making situation in section (iv) of the syllabus.
Part (a) asked for the production plan resulting from the limiting factor. Many candidates
derived the plan by incorrectly ranking on the basis of total profit, completely ignoring the
limiting factor. Other candidates incorrectly derived the plan on the basis of profit per unit of
limiting factor and only a small number of candidates correctly derived the plan on the basis
of contribution per unit of limiting factor.
Part (b) asked for a marginal costing profit statement based on the plan recommended in part
(a). Disappointingly a large number of candidates did not know how to calculate contribution
or how to present the information in a marginal costing format. The most common error when
calculating contribution was to exclude the variable selling and distribution overheads from
variable cost. A large number of candidates incorrectly adopted an absorption costing
approach and apportioned the common overheads between the two products. The common
overheads should have been charged as a period cost in full against the contribution.
Part (c) was well answered with many candidates offering well thought out and structured
answers to the problems associated with their recommended plans.
Part (d) was avoided by many candidates especially those who did not apply a marginal
costing approach in parts (a) and (b). Many candidates who attempted this part of the
question correctly defined contribution and how the contribution concept is applied in limiting
factor decisions, yet their calculation of contribution and the application of the contribution
concept was incorrect in parts (a) and (b). This demonstrated that many candidates had rote
learned the definition of contribution and limiting factors but did not really understand the
application of the contribution concept to limiting factor decisions.
Common Errors
• Using absorption costing and ranking products on the basis of profit per unit of limiting
factor rather than contribution per unit of limiting factor.
• Forgetting to include other variable costs, i.e. variable selling and distribution costs, in the
calculation of contribution.
• Adjusting the fixed costs in line with the change in activity.
Question 3
(a) Prepare the contract account in the books of SS Developments Ltd for the year ended 31
December 2000. (8 marks)
(b) Calculate and explain the amount of profit (if any) to be recognised on the contract for the
year ended 31 December 2000. (8 marks)
(d) Explain briefly two non-financial factors which may arise as a result of the increase in
residential accommodation in Toyville. (4 marks)
Total marks = 25
Rationale
This question examines candidates’ understanding of contract costing. This is a new syllabus
area at the Foundation level and therefore the question is designed to encompass as many
aspects of contract costing as possible.
In part (a), candidates are asked to prepare a contract account for SS Developments Ltd.
They are then asked in part (b) to calculate the amount of profit (if any) to be recognised on
the contract for the year. Part (c) asks the candidates to explain why interim profits are
calculated on contracts. It seeks to test the candidates’ understanding of the answer that they
have calculated in part (b). Finally in part (d), candidates are asked to discuss non-financial
factors arising as a result of the contract. This part of the question requires candidates to
apply some common sense.
Suggested Approach
Part (a)
• Draw up the T account entering the various costs associated with the contract.
• Enter the closing balances for stock of raw materials and the net book value (NBV) of
plant at the end of the period.
• Close off the contract account, the balancing figure being the cost of work not yet
certified.
Part (b)
• Calculate the profit expected from the contract.
• Take a proportion of the profit expected according to the degree of completion to date;
this will then be the profit recognised for the contract.
Part (c)
• In your own words explain why companies recognise interim profits on contracts.
Part (d)
• Applying a common sense approach consider two non-financial implications of a
development of this nature.
Part (a)
Entries into the contract account 5
Adjust for depreciation and the NBV of the plant 3
Part (b)
Calculation of the expected profit and the profit recognised 5
Explanation of the calculation 3
Part (c)
Provide an explanation incorporating the length of the contract, fluctuation
in the reported results and prudence 5
Part (d)
Two problems for Toyville associated with the residential development 4
Examiner’s Comments
This question examined candidates’ understanding of contract costing in section (iii) of the
syllabus. Performance was either very good or very poor. It was evident that a large number
of candidates had never studied contract costing but preferred to answer this question rather
than the other optional question on standard costing and variance analysis.
In part (a) candidates were required to prepare a contract account. This was reasonably well
answered but many candidates included non-cost items in the contract account e.g. value of
work certified to date, cash receipts. Also many candidates correctly calculated annual
depreciation but did not charge the correct proportion (10/12ths) to the contract account.
In part (b) candidates were required to calculate and explain the amount of profit to be
recognised on the contract. Many candidates correctly calculated the amount of profit to be
recognised on the contract, but only a small number explained the result. Some candidates
simply calculated a profit as at 31 December 2000 and used this as the profit recognised for
the year. Candidates should have calculated the expected profit for the whole contract and
then taken a prudent proportion that represented the profit recognised as at 31 December
2000.
Part (c), concerning the reasons why interim profits are recognised on contracts, was well
answered by most candidates. Many earned full marks on this part of the question.
Part (d) was well answered. There were some well thought out and structured answers with
many candidates earning full marks.
Common Errors
• Including non-cost items in the contract account e.g. value of work certified to date, cash
receipts.
• Forgetting to adjust for depreciation and charging the contract with the full cost of the
plant.
• Charging a full year’s depreciation when the contract only commenced on 1 March.
• Not adjusting the final expected profit to recognise a profit at this stage in the contract.
Question 4
(b) Prepare an operating statement for the period using detailed variance analysis to
reconcile the standard cost of the new specialist unit with the actual cost of the new
specialist unit. (10 marks)
Total marks = 25
Rationale
This question examines the application of standard costing in a service environment. The
question focuses on the labour and overhead cost variances. It is designed to encompass as
many aspects as possible within this area. It is important that candidates have a good
understanding of this topic as it forms the basis of the underpinning knowledge required for
performance measurement at the Intermediate level.
In part (a) candidates are required to calculate the standard cost for each type of assessment.
This then forms the basis for calculating the labour and overhead cost variances in part (b).
Candidates are also asked in part (b) to prepare an operating statement reconciling the
standard cost for the period with the actual cost. Part (c) asks candidates to give a reason for
each of the variances arising and to explain the possible difficulties that this type of
organisation may encounter when using standard costing. Candidates should apply a
common sense approach when answering this part of the question.
Suggested Approach
Part (a)
• Identify the standard costs for a general health assessment and a medical assessment.
Part (b)
• Draw up the pro-forma operating statement.
• Using the standard cost for each assessment calculate the total standard cost and insert
the figure into the operating statement.
• Calculate the actual cost and insert the figure into the operating statement.
• Calculate and insert the variances.
Part (c)
• Suggest some reasons why the variances calculated may have occurred.
• Discuss the difficulties of using standard costing in this type of organisation.
Part (a)
Standard cost calculation 5
Part (b)
Operating statement - format 1
Actual cost and standard cost 3
Variances 6
Part (c)(i)
One reason for each variance calculated 3
Part (c)(ii)
Key points explaining the difficulties of using standard costing in this
organisation 7
Examiner’s Comments
In part (a), candidates were required to calculate the standard costs of a general health
assessment and a medical assessment. Many candidates failed to earn marks because they
prepared the budgeted costs for each type of assessment rather than a unit standard cost for
each.
In part (b), the preparation of an operating statement was required. Many candidates failed to
earn presentation marks because they were unable to produce such a statement. Only a
small number of candidates correctly calculated the standard cost for the new specialist unit.
Many candidates incorrectly used the budgeted costs even though the question specifically
asked for the reconciliation of standard cost to actual cost. The labour efficiency and labour
rate variances were well done by the majority of candidates. However, the majority were
unable to calculate the fixed overhead expenditure and fixed overhead volume variances, and
tended to calculate only the total fixed overhead cost variance.
Part (c)(i) was generally well answered. However some candidates, when offering their
explanations for the variances arising, tended not to make them specific to the variances
calculated in part (b) and simply offered a general explanation for variances occurring. In
some cases candidates wrote about the material usage variance and the material price
variance even though there were no materials to consider in the question!
Part (c)(ii) required a general discussion of the possible difficulties of using standard costing
in this type of organisation. Most candidates provided poor answers to this part of the
question. Discussions were too general and in most cases too brief to warrant the award of
seven marks. Candidates failed to discuss the general problems associated with using
standard costing in a service industry and in particular the problems encountered when
setting a standard time per assessment in relation to the specialist unit. Many candidates
believed that all organisations could easily use standard costing without any difficulties!
Common Errors
• Confusing standard cost with budgeted cost.
• When explaining the reason for variances, failing to make the reasons specific to the
variances calculated in part (b) and instead giving general reasons for variances
occurring.
• Believing that all organisations can easily use standard costing without any difficulties.