Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Cougar Collection Agency B
Cougar Collection Agency B
Prepared By
Chris Diaz
Issues
Facts
Analysis
Conclusion
Issues
1. How did your systems design from the Cougar Collection Agency (A) case differ
compare to Melvin Cooley’s design characteristics described in this case? Explain any
differences.
2. Why are internal controls missing from Melvin Cooley’s list of design characteristics?
3. What mistakes did Melvin Cooley make on this project? How could these mistakes have
been avoided?
5. From Jim Lake’s perspective, is this a lost project? Can it be salvaged? How?
Summary of the Facts
Over the period of the next several months, Melvin Cooley made several visits and phone calls to
Cougar Agency. He then presented to Jim Lake and his assistant manager, Andria Seely, a
conceptual design of an automated collection system that had the following characteristics:
1. The new system would be a personal computer (PC) environment utilizing a secondhand
2. Initially, the system would use batch processing in the single workstation to generate
daily status reports. Personnel would use the reports for manual file inquiries.
3. When more development funds become available, the system would be upgraded to real
4. The processing for delinquent customer and payment register files would be automated.
Any entry to the payment register file would automatically update the other files.
5. Data entry screens designed according to human factors considerations would allow
relatively untrained operators to update records more quickly than making manual
entries.
6. Customer checks would be generated automatically every two weeks. The amount of
each check would be computed automatically and consolidated from separate entries on
7. The delinquent file would be scanned automatically once a month to produce a report of
LAN, the proposed new system could not promise better posing of credit collection
contacts. However, daily reports annotated by individual collectors can facilitate manual
entry of actions. Clerical personnel then could enter these entries the next day. This
John Lake was enthusiastic about the proposed system and signed a letter of agreement with
Melvin Cooley relating to consulting fees, payment schedules, scope of the project, delivery
schedule and Melvin’s post-changeover responsibilities. Melvin then began the detailed design
and programming of the new system. However, problems began to surface and boil. Melvin felt
that most of these problems might have existed in a large system environment, but they seemed
complicated by the small business setting of Cougar Collection Agency. Some of these problems
1. Workstation competition: Clerical personnel had started to use the PC for word
processing tasks (e.g., letters and contracts). There was not always sufficient time during
the day for Melvin to enter his test programs. The workstation available to the consultant
was compatible with others. Melvin began using the workstation at night and on
2. Change of Scope: Almost daily, the manager and assistant manager requested changes to
the proposed system to address points they had forgotten. These changes to the proposed
system slowed down development. Very late in the project, Melvin Cooley was asked to
suggest how a Web-based application might work. Melvin never responded to this
particular request.
3. Lack of File Integrity: The manager hired a part-time programmer to develop a small
Access customer and delinquent file to generate mailing labels. Melvin would return to
find part of his programs and test files missing or modified, presumably by the part-time
programmer. He decided to take a complete dump of his work whenever he left the
and shout at debtors; debtors shout back. The atmosphere in a credit collection firm is
angry and tense. Managers and credit collectors often took out their frustrations on the
atmosphere, became tense and made more than the expected number of logic errors. It
was like a student trying to take an examination on the floor of the New York Stock
Exchange.
5. Impatience: Jim Lake became impatient with development progress although the project
never was more than a week behind schedule. Even when the system was about to be
implemented, Jim’s impatience grew. Melvin Cooley decided that there were not enough
clerical hours available to convert the entire old customer delinquent and payment
register card files to the new automated format. So he decided to convert individual cards
(records) when some activity (e.g., payment) occurred. This is called a “day-one
approach”. It would take about one month for all active records to be converted to the
new system. When Melvin tried to explain this to the computer-naïve Jim Lake, Jim
Ranted, raved and started to treat Melvin the same way as he treated the browbeaten
clerical personnel.
Jim lake withheld the next scheduled payment to Melvin Cooley. Melvin had called Jim and
explained that he could not continue working on the new collection system until he received his
payment. Jim Lake had shouted at Melvin over the phone, and threated to sue Melvin. After this
Conclusion