The document analyzes collusion among power holders in state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in Indonesia despite reforms towards democracy and good governance. In-depth interviews reveal practices of collective conservatism, reciprocal opportunism, and normalization of corruption, allowing conglomerate business owners to gain control over SOE management. There is a continuous process of "wall-building and gatekeeping" among political and business elites and officials to maintain the status quo and prevent new competition. Tackling collusion and illicit practices in SOEs is necessary for good governance reforms and an improved business environment in Indonesia.
The document analyzes collusion among power holders in state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in Indonesia despite reforms towards democracy and good governance. In-depth interviews reveal practices of collective conservatism, reciprocal opportunism, and normalization of corruption, allowing conglomerate business owners to gain control over SOE management. There is a continuous process of "wall-building and gatekeeping" among political and business elites and officials to maintain the status quo and prevent new competition. Tackling collusion and illicit practices in SOEs is necessary for good governance reforms and an improved business environment in Indonesia.
The document analyzes collusion among power holders in state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in Indonesia despite reforms towards democracy and good governance. In-depth interviews reveal practices of collective conservatism, reciprocal opportunism, and normalization of corruption, allowing conglomerate business owners to gain control over SOE management. There is a continuous process of "wall-building and gatekeeping" among political and business elites and officials to maintain the status quo and prevent new competition. Tackling collusion and illicit practices in SOEs is necessary for good governance reforms and an improved business environment in Indonesia.
AB - Purpose The purpose of this paper is to illuminate the hidden process of
collusion among power holders in state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in an emerging economy, which endures despite comprehensive reforms towards democracy and good governance. Why are mechanisms of checks and balances not functioning in the way they should?Design/methodology/approach The analysis is based on in-depth interviews with board members, executives, politicians, bureaucrats and representatives from auditing boards involved in the management of SOEs in Indonesia.Findings The findings reveal practices of collective conservatism, reciprocal opportunism and normalisation of corruption. The costs of getting into powerful positions are so high that conglomerate business owners gain control over the management of SOEs. The authors use the terms “wall-building and gatekeeping” to explain such cases.Research limitations/implications There is a continuous process of wall building and gatekeeping occurring among business oligarchs, bureaucrats and elected politicians in Indonesia. New entrants into the system are co-opted by the established elite.Practical implications This study shows collusion, rent-seeking and corruption among political and business elites as well as top officials in the government hinder good governance reforms in state-owned Indonesian enterprises.Social implications Collusion and illicit business practices in SOEs are clearly grounded on wall building and gatekeeping. Tackling this problem is a precondition for good governance and an improved legal and regulatory business environment in Indonesia. The ideal separation of powers and the checks and balances for good governance apparently need more than a democracy to break through. A further strengthening of the free press and critical academics will be one crucial contribution.Originality/value There is generally a lack of understanding of the context of corruption, such as the influence of institutional and organisational structures. The topic of corruption is also under-researched due to the difficulty of finding empire evidence. This paper contributes to explaining why new political and organisational structures, such as a democratically elected parliament and a particularly designed corruption eradication commission, are not able to hinder rent-seeking practices and illicit political business in state agencies. VL - 14 IS - 5 SN - 1746-8809 DO - 10.1108/IJOEM-08-2018-0433 UR - https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOEM-08-2018-0433 AU - Apriliyanti Indri Dwi AU - Kristiansen Stein Oluf PY - 2019 Y1 - 2019/01/01 TI - The logics of political business in state-owned enterprises: the case of Indonesia T2 - International Journal of Emerging Markets PB - Emerald Publishing Limited SP - 709 EP - 730 Y2 - 2020/12/13 ER -