Professional Documents
Culture Documents
F01 (C)
Issue No.04 Rev. No 4 Dated: June 7i, 2014
COURSE PLAN
Approved By
_______________________ _______________________
HOD Dean
Programme B. Com., LLB. (Hons.)Taxation Course: Legal Method & Legal Reasoning
: Laws
A. STUDENT OUTCOME:
The student outcome of the course study are as mentioned herein under:
To study the many inter-and cross linkages law has with its frontier and other
disciplines.
To distinguish and delineate the various methods of social control that law
provides.
B. COURSE OUTLINE:
1. Meaning and understanding of the term ‘Law’, Definitions by Key Jurists; Limitations
on having a categorical definition
2. Functions, Application of Law, Territorial Nature of Law , Law and Morality, Question
of Fact Vs. Question of Law ,Law, Science and Technology, General Classification of
Law
3. Introduction to Legal Theories.
4. Introduction to basic Schools of Law
C. COURSE PEDAGOGY
Description Weightage
Continuous Assessment: (Marks 100 - converted to 30) based on the following five (5)
components:
67-75 % 0 Marks
75-80% 5 Marks
80-85% 10 Marks
85-90% 15 Marks
90%-100% 20 Marks
Four components will be used for internal assessment for this course (Total 100 marks),
the details of each component is as follows:
1. Home Assignment:
Assignment is given on the pattern of End Term Examination and it must be hand
written, to submit/present on a definite date. The assignment is attached with the
course plan as Annexure-I. It will have 20% weightage.
c) Every student will be asked to prepare a project from the suggested List
(see Annexure-II) and go through the primary/secondary data collection and
analysis/interpretation and finally prepare the Project.
2. Quizzes/Tests
Mid- Sem examination shall be of two hour duration and shall be a combination of
Objective, short theory, descriptive, analytical and problem based questions.
End-Sem examination shall be of three hours duration. The examination paper shall have
objective & theory questions, short as well as long Analytical and problem based
questions.
Attendance
Cell Phones and other Electronic Communication Devices: Cell phones and other
electronic communication devices (such as Blackberries/Laptops) are not permitted in
classes during Tests or the Mid/Final Examination. Such devices MUST be turned off in
the class room.
E-Mail and LMS: Each student in the class should have an e-mail id and a pass word to
access the LMS system regularly. Regularly, important information – Date of conducting
(No.)
Lecture, Discussions
General Introduction the Subject and
discussion on the Course Plan.
1.
Lectures
Discussion
Illustrations
Introduction to Legal Theories. Jurisprudence –The Legal
Theory B.N Mani Tripathy
Page 12
5.
Lectures
Legal Theories (continued ) Discussions
Jurisprudence –The Legal
Q&A
Theory B.N Mani Tripathy
Book Referencing
6. Pages 19-106
8. Schools of Law
Jurisprudence –The Legal Lectures
Theory B.N Mani Tripathy Discussion
College of Legal Studies July-December 2016
Q&As
Pages 19-106
Studies in Jurisprudence
and Legal Theory
Dr. N.V. Paranjape
9.
Studies in Jurisprudence
and Legal Theory
Dr. N.V. Paranjape
11. Lectures
MODULE 2 : Indian Legal System Discussion
Illustrations
General History of Indian Legal System. PPT
Legal Research
Introduction to Basic Principles under Indian Methodology
Legal System(Continued) Dr. S.R. Myneni Lectures
PPT
Discussion
Legal Research
Methodology
17. Dr.H.N Tewari
Legal Research
Methodology
Dr. S.R. Myneni
Legal Research
Methodology
Dr.H.N Tewari
Legal Research
Methodology
Dr.H.N Tewari
Lectures
Precedents-Centered Reasoning Legal Research PPT
Methodology Discussion
Dr. S.R. Myneni
19.
Legal Research
Methodology
Dr.H.N Tewari
20.
Legal Research
Methodology
Dr.H.N Tewari
Legal Research
Statute/Legislation and Legislative Process Methodology Lectures
Dr. S.R. Myneni Discussion
21.
Legal Research
Methodology
Dr.H.N Tewari
Legal Research
Methodology
Dr.H.N Tewari
26.
Legal Research
Methodology
Dr.H.N Tewari
Legal Research
Methodology Q&A
Revision for Mid Semester Examination Dr. S.R. Myneni Quizzes etc.
Brainstorming
30.
Legal Research
Methodology
Dr.H.N Tewari
Legal Research
Methodology
Dr.H.N Tewari
31.
Social Sciences Research Techniques Legal Research Lectures
applied in Legal Science Research: Non- Methodology Discussion
Doctrinal or Empirical Approach-(Continued) Dr. S.R. Myneni
Legal Research
Methodology
Dr.H.N Tewari
32.
Legal Research Lectures
Rudiments of Social Science Research Methodology Discussions
Dr. S.R. Myneni Q&A
:
Legal Research
Methodology Reading Group
Major Steps in Empirical Research Dr. S.R. Myneni Lectures
Discussion
33.
Legal Research
Methodology
Dr.H.N Tewari
Legal Research
Case Law Study Methodology
Dr. S.R. Myneni Reading Group
Lecture
Discussion
34.
Legal Research
Methodology
Dr.H.N Tewari
Legal Research
Methodology Reading Group
Legal Citations (Bluebook, Chicago Manual Dr. S.R. Myneni Lectures
Etc.) Discussion
Legal Research
Methodology
Dr.H.N Tewari
Lectures
Discussion
Legal Research
39
Methodology
Dr.H.N Tewari
Legal Research
40 Case Law Exercise Methodology PPT
Dr. S.R. Myneni Lectures
Workshop
Legal Research
Methodology
Dr.H.N Tewari
Legal Research
Methodology
Dr.H.N Tewari
44 Tutorial on Writing
46 Viva Voce
Viva Voce Viva Voce
The students can meet the faculty on any working day between in the Faculty Room Floor III, 2306).
(Subject to time table/Availability of Faculty).
3. Jurisprudence –The Legal Theory B.N Mani Tripathy Allahabad Law Agency
6. Studies in Jurisprudence and Legal Dr. N.V. Paranjape Central Law Agency
Theory
11. Legal System and Lawyers’ Julius Stone Universal Law Publishing
Co.
Reasoning
12. Text book on Legal Methods, Legal Tushar Kanti Saha Universal Publishers
13. Legal Research Methodology Shipra Agrawal Sri Sai Law Publication
College of Legal Studies July-December 2016
14. Legal Research Methodology Dr. S.R. Myneni Allahabad Law Agency
M. Afzal Wani
SUGGESTED READINGS
Calabresi, Steven & Prakash Saikrishna, The President’s Power to Execute the Laws, 104
YALE LAW JOURNAL 541 (1994).
Cohen, Felix, Transcendental Nonsense and the Functional Approach, 35 COLUMBIA LAW
REVIEW 809 (1935).
Eberie, Edward J., & Grossfeld, Bernhard, Law and Poetry, 11 ROGER WILLIAMS UNIVERSITY
LAW REVIEW 353 (2005).
Grossfeld, Bernhard & Eberie, Edward J., Patterns of Law in Comparative Law: Discovering
and Decoding Invisible Powers, 38 TEXAS INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL 291 (2003).
Holmes, Oliver Wendell, The Path of the Law, 110 HARVARD LAW REVIEW 991 (1997).
Irani, Phiroze K., The Courts and the Legislature in India, 14 INTERNATIONAL AND
COMPARATIVE LAW QUARTERLY 950 (1965).
Manning, John F., Textualism and Legislative Intent, 91 VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW 419 (2005).
McLeod, Adam J., Law as Bard: Extolling a Culture’s Virtue, Exposing Its Vices, and Telling
Its Story, 1 JOURNAL JURISPRUDENCE 11(2008).
Prakash, Saikrishna, The Essential Meaning of Executive Power, UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS LAW
REVIEW 701 (2003).
Treanor, William, Against Textualism, 103 NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW 983
(2009).
H. INSTRUCTIONS
f) Plagiarism, in any form, will be least tolerated. Student, if found plagiarized, will be
subject to disciplinary action. To avoid plagiarism, the instructor recommends the
following:
1. Acknowledge by way of a citation whatever is borrowed.
2. Put in quotation any sentence in which there are more than 12 words in a
sequence
3. To the maximum extent possible, paraphrase others’ ideas and then
acknowledge them through citations.
4. Make all borrowings, which are more than 50 words in a sequence, into a
block quote.
However,
Annexure-I
SEMESTER - I
ASSIGNMENT –I
FOR
Legal Method & Legal Reasoning
(LLBG102)
College of Legal Studies July-December 2016
Under the Supervision of: Shambhavi Sinha
NAME: _______________________
SAP NO: _______________________
ROLL NO -------------------------------------
ON ASSIGNMENT SOLVING
3. Please remember that due to the dynamic and rapidly changing global legal
environment and the continuously realigning geopolitical situation, your answers
should capture and depict the current contemporary information.
Say no to plagiarism!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6. CIVIL JUDGE
7. CIVIL LAW
12. CONCILIATION
24. EUTHANASIA
58. MEDIATION
81. PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION AND ITS CONTRIBUTION IN INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM
*The above mentioned are suggested topics, the students can opt for other topics in
consultation with the Faculty.
May be in 3 paragraphs
a. Highlighting the topic
b. Areas of concern and expected solution
c. Scheme of research
d. Key words
2. Submission of synopsis
5. The student shall indicate clearly and extensively in his/her project, the
following:
6. A certificate to the effect that the project work carried out by the student
independently or in collaboration with other student(s) endorsed by the student
shall form the part of the submission for evaluation.
8. All projects submitted by the students will go through the process of plagiarism
check through the anti-plagiarism software (Turnitin). The report produced by
the software will necessarily be as per the standards prescribed by the
university. If the report is below standards the supervisor will reject the project
and award zero marks.
Annexure-IV
Class test Class test 2/ Quiz Abstract Synopsis Assignment Final Project Viva
1/quiz submissio submission Project Presentations
n Submission
Snap Test Snap Test 2 August September September October 10, October November
1 7, 2016 10, 2016 2016 20-31, 2016 24 - 30,
To be intimated a 25, 2016
2016*
To be week before the
intimated test/quiz
a week
before the
test/quiz
Tentative Dates; Any changes will be informed with within Appropriate time lines