You are on page 1of 1

PAQUITO V.

ANDO, petitioner in their personal capacity and thus


v the execution should not prosper.
ANDRESITO Y. CAMPO, ET AL., - It was likewise denied. Hence, the
respondents petition.

ISSUES:
FACTS: - W/N the subject property can be
- Paquito Ando (petitioner) was the levied for reason of a debt incurred
president of Premier Allied and by him, in his company, PACSI.
Contracting Services, Inc. (PACSI),
an independent labor contractor. RULING:
- The petition is meritorious.
- Respondents, hired as pilers or
haulers, were dismissed from - The power of the NLRC to execute
employment. Consequently, they its judgment extends only to
filed a case for illegal dismissal. properties unquestionably belonging
- The Labor Arbiter ruled in to the judgment debtor alone.
respondents’ favor. - Thus, a sheriff has no authority to
attach the property of any person
- PACSI and Ando were directed to except that of the judgment debtor.
pay for separation pay and other - The property in question belongs not
fees. only to Ando, but his wife as well.
- PACSI and Ando appealed to NLRC, - She stands to lose the property
which affirmed the Labor Arbiter’s subject to execution without ever
decision. being a party to the case – which is
tantamount to deprivation of
- The NLRC acting sheriff issued a property without due process.
Notice of Sale on Execution of - By Section 16, Rule 39 of the Rules
Personal Property over a property in of Court, the officer shall not be
the name of “Paquito V. Ando xxx bound to keep the property since
married to Erlinda S. Ando.” there is a third-party claim on the
- Ando files an action for prohibition property, which is the wife subject to
and claims that the property her conjugal property.
belonged to him and his wife, not the
corporation, and hence, could not be - WHEREFORE, the petition is
the subject of the execution sale. GRANTED.

- RTC denied the prayer for TRO and


directed him to file a claim with the
NLRC Sheriff.
- Instead, Ando filed a petition for
certiorari before the CA.
- Ando argued that the property to be
levied belonged to him and his wife

You might also like