ition gnehred MAR) LIF \aepmE oon " EXPERIMENT# 5, "To determine the effect of length/diameter ratio on accuracy of machining by varying the diameter of work piece. — Fa turteing operation performed by the Iathe machine depends ‘The accuracy of machining 61 ‘on a munber of parameters, The scope of this experiment is to find out how the effect of engthidismeter ratio on accuracy of w turing process performed by the lathe machine varies with diameter, Apparatus:- Lathe machine: Micrometer Dial indicator. Magnetic mand machine and holding it like 2inch grip length plus TOinch working length. $2, Divide und mark the working length into five equally spaced L/D ratios, iene, Faas 9°10"), 3-3. Now cheek the total run out error by installing the magnetic stand. with dial indicator (heer type) On the Slide as briefed. 3-4. Install the lover of dial indicator with some tension by taking first position (ix. fn Ihe work pisve extension length then rotate the bezel (revolving scale) to zero. After positioning the dial indicator, rotate the chuck by hand at 360°and note the total Indicating reading in the ble, 5-5, Repeut he same procedure by taking four L/D miios further and note down the totatinclicaring readting én the tible accordingly. Affer calculating the: maximum run out (*TIR "otal indicating reading) apply the depth of cut accordingly and machine the whole working length. 5-8, Now, measure the initial diameter at five equally spaced L/D ratios and note the measurement in the table provided. 3-9. Now apply“ Imm’ depth of cut anid muichine the job, $-10.After machining whole working tength measure and note the required, obtuined diameters of job also differcace of reading at five equally spaced L/D ratios in the table (1st observation), $411 Now apply imum’ dept of cut again and machine the job, $42. After machining measure and note the required, obtained dinmeter of job und difference of seating at five equilly spaced L/D ratios in the 2nd observation table. $-13,Compare the diffrence by-changing the length/dinmeter ratio and conchide the ‘Temarks necordingly 54.ditions should remain constant except diameter of job. ‘se1d: Ench (ime cutiing eon" - Figure 5.1 Rolationship hetween the work plece extension length /diameter ratio In turning appliestion‘opm ora neh Fa Le Soest LL A pai cas ett eich tal wage Least Count, Od) apy ay dicoldt Least Count 2 -p\ yn ene wee) | e/a = ec) [1a Tie Te ie “rR Ode pe won| an] e2 | ave be. | din | 012 avg: Ou: | Ol | Din? | Ao olm a= 99-24-24) 12-23 hp-18) 10 122? iat yl [2 a nal < AM qay/ 193) yy-23 vz |ii2e | oa Dyess Lys rete vl yy iz [ave Dia. | ona | pina | Avg a onal ia af Avg. Dia isa foot fev 0-477 |gul gal wee St haat v2 fue ie B-eK 086) o-oS pose P=) .07 fe pe) 02S jest aeOBSERVATION a SS TNE GeO Michp mela amet alia uate teas Cownt DOlyayw Aw olic aly east cane___O-lmys__— a ema oe] tah Dn tes) | EaeaW PLT IN ree) TR: : re —— Re [oot [™ _o-08 we g-ob | ~2-08 oe ba.| oud | aa] ave ot [oad |on2| Ave vie [et | D9? wap [esl 2 erey 2H 11>) dv SD M)2-2F lowly e| v.07 (reaal seis | (049 bias | Diat2 | Avg. Din. yaar [49-20 N24 Joliors} (2-26 [te ‘avai, | Dia.1 | Dia2| Avg. Dia. Joa Nea) [Nb 24l yodb| W-2S pina | pia2'| Ave, Om | ota | Diaz! sort fro-ay|re-AM] Yor Bh frond] ror tod) _|\o4 paCfoe7 one Jor | orel}oo& joelne : Z wT Lhe ah dary te idee, te Sane fiz__leinch Ah wh plese Littl Ba pup vn fou" __lobhw Diane A mp th tha eat ~ Then wt “Diemetan og thee T we ple 0d amd Oren ved the heck eK. Lp ADD pe ee Ke) P that bt rete * eahsing thi Dia wf wpe picbe » OB¢. Alix verge Wwe: Hi pis at f tL be Leselph hi adh, . We paptlided thyt fhe ie fet — luted Pee ef Nin Lhe tuk Al te” trad —aA= Ofy aie. LAIeA+ a oT ae R e