Professional Documents
Culture Documents
”Overemphasized in explaining crisis cults, the political has been curiously neglected in
most studies of shamanism,” observes Weston La Barre (1970:301) in The Ghost Dance.
“Both North American and Siberian shamans . . were often leaders as well as protectors of
their groups; and South American shaman-messiahs commonly combined political and
magical power over men and cosmos alike.” In numerous South American lowland
societies lacking states or hereditary chieftaincies, intragroup conflicts were commonly ex-
pressed and political preeminence established through a complex of magical aggression
and cure that pitted rival shamans against each other as poles of faction formation and
leadership Shamans were also paramount in fighting between stateless groups indeed, in
forest zones bordering the Andes today, great shamans are still accorded the Quechua title
kuraka, which the Inca and Spanish governments used to designate state-endorsed ethnic
lords or chieftains (Porras 1979:28; Oberem 1971:226; Whitten 1976:141-163, Harner 1972
77-1 33, Robinson 1972).
What i s the relation between such stateless forms of political process and the gover-
nance of empires or nation-states? When conquerors impose centralized, hereditary, or
bureaucratic regimens on the periphery of their domains, do stateless modes of political a c -
tion inevitably wither or do they flare up sporadically in the guise of crisis cults? Or might
they acquire new functions that confer durability and even special potency under the new
order? If the latter, we may ask what impact their persistence has on interethnic relations in
the state orbit.
This essay concerns the political importance of magical aggression at the margins of the
later Spanish Empire in parts of what are now Ecuador and southern Colombia On the
evidence available from these places it appears that shamanic politics can well survive the
imposition of the state and indeed affect its subsequent evolution. The reasons for this are
sought both inside the affected ethnic groups and in interethnic relations.
The Pasto indigenous village of Buesaquillo, in the jurisdiction of the city of Pasto in
what i s now southern highland Colombia, was part of a poor region far from the centers of
colonial economy. Settlement by Spaniards was less dense than in most highlands, and
Buesaquillo was slightly outside the farthest margin of the Inca penetration zone (Romoli
1977-78; Moreno Ruiz 1971). Early records indicate a multiplicity of very small native
political units, some of which appear from the clustering of personal names to have housed
localized kindreds. The accused, Lorenzo Buesaquillo, derived his notoriety as a sorcerer
primarily from enmities between him and his neighbors within one of these localized units,
including his own kin. This local controversy might never have come to the attention of co-
lonial judges had not a corregidor (crown governor) given credence to the accusation that
Buesaquillo accepted payment from one Spaniard to kill another. In the course of his trial a
number of intraindigenous accusations surfaced. These instances provide good examples
of sorcery accusation in its most common highland manifestation, the prosecution of con-
flicts whose import to the collectivity i s “micropolitical” (Douglas 197O:xiv). They also
serve to introduce the cast of roles and beliefs omnipresent in shaman trials of the period.
Buesaquillo’s indigenous accusers blamed him for six acts of magical aggression. First,
they said, he killed a minor Spanish official by putting a green toad under the victim’s door-
way so that it would enter the victim’s body and madden or kill him. Second, witnesses said
that after brawling with his cousin’s husband, Buesaquillo infliced a sickness on the hus-
band that made his neck and throat dry up. A curing shaman from the Sibundoy valley diag-
nosed the maleficio (evil spell) and remedied it. Third, three witnesses averred that when a
neighbor whipped Buesaquillo’s children for stealing food from his fields, Buesaquillo
retaliated by poisoning the neighbor’s corn beer. A fatal disease then seized the neighbor’s
heart and “dried” his body to death in three days. The same Sibundoy curer diagnosed this
spell but could not break it. Fourth and fifth, Buesaquillo was blamed for the deaths of two
men whom he had threatened while they were drinking together. Sixth, a man who had
A few days after what had happened (I e., the dispute over the debt). he had a very sharp pain in
the shoulder and it spread throughout his body; when [the curer] cured him and gave him a potion of
a forest vine, he expelled through the mouth, as vomit, something like egg whites, and then lizards.
bumblebees, and centipedes, which amazed everyone.
The Spanish judge took these accusations quite seriously and ordered Buesaquillo inter-
rogated on the rack. The trial record contains verbatim the questioning under torture:
When the magistrate saw that (Buesaquillo) did not want to say or confess anything, he ordered him
stripped naked to the skin except for some underclothes t o cover his shame, and thus stripped he
ordered him placed and tied onto the said rack, and ordered the torturer to tighten the cords, and
when they were thus tightened asked the said Lorenso if it was true that he had killed the people
mentioned in the trial with his spells and likewise if with his spells he had undone the sanity of the
Royal Constable as he had said in confession-[Buesaquillo] said he had not killed for Cod’s sake
sir, that he had not made the Royal Constable insane, sir, for the love of Cod, and [the magistrate]
ordered [the torturer] t o give another turn [of the rack], Ayayay, for the love of Cod, I did not do
what they are punishing [me] for (Inconsistencies of direct and indirect quotation are thus in the
original )
Buesaquillo withstood the torture without confessing further. Nonetheless, he was ordered
to testify again, before the Audiencia (supreme tribunal), at the insistence of churchmen
who suspected that “a mixture of heresy” in his magic justified further investigation. N o
other records have been found.
In its simplicity, Buesaquillo’s case illustrates some popular expectations about in-
digenous sorcery cases as shared by Indians and Spaniards. The magical aggressor was felt
to have an adversary in the victim’s defender, a magical curer. Curer and killer were in-
variably described as very distinct roles. Curers were not credited with revenge killings, and
the curer was almost always a foreigner or outsider t o the victim’s own immediate group,
usually a member of a forest-dwelling ethnic group. Killers killed on their own behalf or for
clients.
Lorenzo Buesaquillo was accused of using the two most common magical weapons, the
magical dart and the disease bundle. A shaman in drug trance was thought to be capable of
shooting into his victim’s body ”darts” that engendered or contained harmful vermin
(Whitten 1976:145-163; Parsons 1945:72). Disease bundles, of which the toad was perhaps
the most common, had to be buried where the victim trod, usually under his doorway. In mod-
ern usage the toad is tortured beforehand as a proxy victim (Mac-Lean y Estenos 1940:304).To
prepare a disease bundle, modern killers sprinkle the toad with alcohol, tie it with colored
thread, wrap it in a piece of cloth belonging to the victim, and sometimes seal it in a pot
(Esteva Fabregat 1970:33). Both the dart and the bundle have distributions that span coast,
sierra, and Amazonia and extend from the northern to the southern extremes of the Andean
cultural province (Bastien 1978:160-167; Taussig 1980). This complex i s in latge part a New
World creation. The European witchcraft tradition, as recorded in Malleus Maleficarum
(Kramer and Sprenger 1971[1486]:137-148), employed buried disease agents, but the
elaboration of wrapping is probably related to the Andean technique of making despachos
(offering bundles) for benign purposes (Bolton and Bolton 1976). Magical darts are an
American tradition.
The Sibundoy curer also used techniques that appear almost invariant in the South
American tradition. The administration of a vine brew, probably Banisteriopsis, to the vic-
tim, enabling him to see disease agents, resembles, for example, modern Jivaroan practice
(Harner 1972). In most cases (see below) the dart i s sucked out. To neutralize a disease bun-
dle, the curer-shaman must find, unearth, and burn it. In all such techniques, prior prepara-
A slightly earlier outbreak of shamanic combat in the west-slope rain forest (montaiia)
community of Paccha also mirrored colonial tendencies, but these derived from change on
a macroregional scale. Paccha belonged to the district of Zaruma, whose gold mines at in-
tervals had brought many highland laborers into a region of scarce aboriginal population.
During the 17th and early 18th centuries the Zaruma mines had declined; but large
numbers of highlanders still took to forest regions such as Zaruma in the hope of evading
tribute or escaping latifundia (Moreno Yanez 1976:395). Among these migrants, as among
modern colonos in similar regions, cattle raising brought fast profits, dominion over wide
terrains, and favorable integration with the market economy. At the same time the cattle
economy proved gravely disruptive of aboriginal forest society, as i t still does today
(Macdonald 1981). Taussig (1980:244) observes that the consequent conflicts not only pit in-
migrant cattle raisers against aboriginal forest groups but also create splits within the local
aboriginal groups-
Land disputes between colonists and Indians [in the Colombian Putumayo] lead to disputes among
the Indians themselves. Colonization forces Indians to adapt their land usage and landholding prac-
tices to those favored by the national market and national law. Disputes develop within Indian com-
munities as to whether to opt for individual private property holdings or communal land under the
aegis of the shaman.
C a t t l e raising has now become a troublesome preoccupation. It features dramatically in social con-
flicts, heightens preexisting animosities between people, and raises the risks and amount of money
involved in farming to a very high degree (1980:259).
Around 1700, Andres Arevalo, the universally feared killer shaman of Paccha, made it no
secret that he hated cattle-raising newcomers and those among his own people who fol-
lowed their example. O n one occasion, neighbors reported, he asked what right outsider In-
dians had to come to Paccha with one skinny cow and then give themselves the airs of
The Spanish authorities at Zaruma found Arevalo and his wife guilty. Ignoring the vic-
tims’ fevered pleas for capital penalties, the judge sentenced the two to be whipped in the
streets, stripped of their modest goods, and exiled for six years to the highland town of
Alausi where they were to do unpaid penal labor in a textile workshop. Arevalo appealed
his case to the Audiencia in Quito, and the Protector of Natives (a state-paid officer) made
a spirited defense on the grounds that Arevalo was really a harmless maisincho (seer) and
not a sorcerer But the judges of the Audiencia, convinced that even a rumor of his return
t o Paccha would cause the community to disband entirely, imposed an even stiffer
sentence than the first. They condemned the couple to lifelong exile and also ordered pros-
ecution of the curing shaman Vallejo.
The political nature of the episode was clear to the parties involved, although they did
not use political terms to describe it. The crucial issue was that a locally dominant practi-
tioner of lowland shamanism had set his face against the ascendancy of an immigrant
ranching population that preferred governance along highland lines. In his bid to win their
”respect,” Arevalo behaved with the fierceness proper to the killer-leader. By doing so, he
not only drove the newcomers into the arms of the Spanish authorities but even alienated
members of his own kindred. Seven of the alleged victims, including three who died, were
his deudos (relatives). The upshot was a consensus against him that crossed the divide be-
tween locals and immigrants and welded them into a new political alliance. In this situa-
tion the vara authorities, although holders only of delegated and temporary power, were
able to act as mediators of an alliance between the aggrieved and the Spanish authorities in
Zaruma. One notable facet of the case is the very weak role of the jural chieftaincy in the
controversy. I t i s likely that hereditary chieftaincy in this region had never been strong prior
to the ranchers’ immigration. I t did not become stronger afterward, partly because the
newcomers were, in effect, refugees from it and partly because hereditary chieftaincy was
not likely to be easily stabilized among the ethnically heterogeneous immigrant popula-
tion. I t is almost impossible to imagine a controversy of this magnitude occurring in the
more colonized highlands without the hereditary chiefs playing a crucial role.
I t would be interesting to know more about the role of Juan Vallejo, the forastero curer.
We do not know where he came from or what became of him, but he evidently played a
crucial role in the transition. In a sense, the collectivity as a whole was his patient (Turner
1967:359-373). Faced with the task of reconstructing the local economy, the people of Pac-
cha availed themselves of ritual t o reconstrue social institutions and reevaluate them.
Household by household, Vallejo taught Paccha that the former social order, exemplified
by the dominance of the killer shaman Arevalo, was an ”illness” that could be ”cured,”
that is, extracted from self and soil and thereby expelled. Spanish authorities seemed to be
unsure how to respond t o Vallejo. In Zaruma his achievement and potential for leadership
were apparently treated with equanimity, perhaps because they would in the short term
reinforce vara authority. But the higher authorities in Quito feared he might become
another local tyrant. How a successful shaman might in fact take command of legal institu-
tions becomes clearer in the following case.
Despite the drastic depopulation of indigenous coastal settlements during colonial times
(Tyrer 1976:66), the Pacific shore parish of Punta Santa Elena still housed in 1786 a native
community probably descended from Huancavilca seafarers. It was not a dramatically “In-
dian” group; no native language seems to have been in use and, with the abolition of the
jural chieftaincies in reprisal for the Tupac Amaru I I rebellion (Rowe 1954:39), i t had ap-
parently lost its last remaining institution of distinctively aboriginal politics. The vara
hierarchy had become the only theater of overtly political action by Indians. Nonetheless,
despite dependence on the Spanish church and state, and despite close supervision,
shamanism played a documented role in competition for vara office.
Sebastian Carlos Cavino, a literate Indian, was reputed among the Hispanic population
of that politically tense period to be a “seditious” person, hostile to the church and respon-
sible for fomenting “tumults and arsons.” He was known for aggressiveness in setting
himself up as a jurisprudente [legal adviser), encouraging litigious Indians; his ostentation in
owning lawbooks annoyed non-Indians. His allegedly loose sexual mores and his sideline in
treasure hunting on the wreck-littered beaches also made him unpopular among “whites.”
When he was elected to become the alcalde ordinario (a native magistracy similar to justice
of the peace) for 1786, the parish priest interrupted his ceremony of investment, withheld
his vara, and imprisoned him.
Soon afterward Sebastian Carlos was tried on charges of criminal sorcery. The local te-
niente (magistrate), an ally of the priest, found him guilty. Hoping t o rid themselves of
Sebastian Carlos before he might rouse his local allies, the authorities took him from his
cell at midnight and under close guard led him shackled onto the highway, where a convoy
was to take him to prison and exile in Quito. But indigenous friends learned of the plan at
once and set out for Guayaquil to lodge a complaint before the Protector of Natives. Mean-
while, on the road between Chanduy and El Moro, Sebastian Carlos managed to escape
from his captors, hide in a ravine, and flee overland. Shortly after, he appeared at the house
of the Protector, requesting appeal. When the Protector obtained a subpoena for the
original acts of imprisonment and trial, the local authorities at Punta Santa Elena mounted
so many delaying tactics that by the time Sebastian Carlos received a transcript of his own
trial, the term of office in question had already elapsed. Nevertheless, he pressed his claim.
From the record of this trial it i s clear that the Indian witnesses, with the sole exception
of the sacristan, would rather have shielded the nature of Sebastian Carlos’s dominance
from non-Indian eyes. Even his surviving victims yielded information grudgingly, and only
when browbeaten and threatened. Perhaps they felt the court was meddling in an in-
tragroup process that could better have settled itself; or perhaps they feared Sebastian
Carlos’s revenge.
The trial record also shows that, unlike Arevalo, Sebastian Carlos chose to involve
himself directly in colonial institutions and used them for unsanctioned ends. Not only the
power of law but also the magical power of the church could be appropriated for shamanic
purposes. In 1783 he prevailed on the sacristan to hide certain objects under the altar so
they would absorb magical force. The sacristan recalled the incident:
The said Carlos took to him 1i.e.. the sacristan] four rods of iron about one hand [i e., 21 cm] long,
and a (heron! goose?] feather with its forked tines at the tip and with the greatest deceptions and
supplications, he begged him to put them under the consecrated communion table, secretly, in
order that the priest not suspect it, so that on a certain feast day mass would be said over them. . .
Sebastian Carlos later used the rods to divine the location of buried silver from a shipwreck.
In both lncaic and Hispanoamerican culture, the antithesis between highland cities and
lowland forests is an element of cosmology that has conditioned political relations. High-
land cities are associated with centricity, culture, civility, and the power of the state, while
the forest stands for the primordial, uncivilized, and centripetal powers of nature, never
subdued by the state. The shaman stands in opposition to the statesman as an exponent of
a contrary kind of power. But the two roles are functionally complementary. Shamans,
both colonial and modern, depend on the highlands for wealth (they travel into highlands
to seek clients) and for legitimacy (to have traveled afar is an important credential). High-
landers, in turn, travel to the homes of lowland shamans seeking cures for disease and
misfortune or to prosecute their vendettas magically. One concomitant of this mutual
dependence is a substantial “vertical” exchange of goods; another is exchange of political
power. We have seen, in the Ar6valo case, that state power and shamanic power were seen
as countervailing forces and that the distressed parties to a shamanic conflict sought to
avail themselves from afar of the state power centered in Quito. In the case of Juan Roza
Pinto, we find an obverse example: the distressed party in a legal conflict in Quito availed
himself from afar of a forest shaman’s services.
Juan Roza Pinto, born in the western montana Yumbo community of Cuagpi, near
modern Nanegal, grew up in an area reputedly riven by shamanic rivalries; indeed, the
eventual dissolution of Cuagpi village was attributed t o them (Salomon in press). AltRDugh
conclusions
Even in areas where the tradition of centralized and dynastic ethnic lordship remained
strong under Inca and early Spanish rule, the late-colonial demotion of the ”republic of In-
dians” appears to have elevated the relative value of supernatural expertise as a political
asset. This i s still more true in areas where ethnic dynastic and vara rule had never been
strong. The rise of shamans to political power at the colonial periphery (Langdon 1981) can
sometimes be correlated to specific colonial pressures within or upon native societies,
pressures that jurally mandated leadership was ill equipped to relieve.
Such instances reflect the local impact of far-reaching social changes. In Buesaquillo,
conflict between curing and killing shamans, and the expulsion of a veteran killer shaman,
may have served t o redistribute households brought into conflict by the land scarcity con-
sequent on latifundium expansion. In Paccha, a curing shaman seems to have galvanized a
notes
Acknowledgments. The research on which this article i s based was made possible by a Tinker Foun-
dation Field Research grant administered by the University of Illinois Center for Latin American and
Caribbean Studies. This help i s gratefully acknowledged.
’ The following are the main manuscript sources on which the present article rests (author transla-
tions from Spanish):
1. Criminales contra don Salvador Ango por Haver Pretendido Quitar la Vida a Don Sebastian Man-
rique por Medio de un Hechicero. Archivo Nacional de Historia, Quito, Indigenas 28. 18
September 1704.
2 . Don Andres de Arevalo, Cacique de Pagche lurisdiccion de Zaruma sobre Destierro por Crimen de
Hechiseria. Archivo Nacional de Historia, Quito, lndigenas 29 3 October 1705
3 Criminales sobre unas Brujas. Archivo Nacional de Historia, Quito, lndigenas 45 18 May 1730.
4 Autos Seguidos por el Protector de Naturales por el Amparo del Yndio Sebastian Carlos sobre Im-
putarle de Brujo. Archivo Nacional de Historia, Quito, lndigenas 114. 9 March 1786
These are the only known primary sources on North Andean indigenous belief systems during the later
colonial era (1680s-1820s). They bear comparison with approximately a dozen cases of magical aggres-
sion for political ends during the same period, conserved in Lima’s Archivo Arzobispal, and with a scat-
tering of similar cases in highland Peruvian archives. Nonetheless, documentation of this type is, on
the whole, scarce
The reason for the scarcity is probably not that indigenous beliefs had ceased t o condition local
political events but that following the end of systematic “extirpation” campaigns around 1660, they
came t o do so through syncretic or crypto-indigenous but outwardly Catholic forms useful for their
superficial compatibility with church requirements (Marzal 1977:115). We know from Webster’s
(1974-76:143-156) studies of a modern Quechua community that shamanic prowess is still a factor
conditioning leadership, yet it has been integrated in a fashion that keeps it off the jural record In-
deed, “the sorcery complex i s surrounded by greater secrecy and more intensive fear than any other
aspect of Andean culture” (Bolton 1974.200). Cases In which shamanic leadership came to trial prob-
ably represent the minority of instances whereby parties offended by shamans’ actions could not or
would not defend themselves within the de facto system by contracting counter-shamans (In some
cases they went to court following the failure of such initial responses.) Cases where shamanic politics
perpetuated itself smoothly within colonial systems are by that very fact unlikely to be documented. If
we are t o get at the shamanic past, we must make the best of the exceptions that test the rule
references cited
under Spanish Rule In Women and Colonialism. Anthropological Perspectives Mona Etienne and
Eleanor Leacock, eds. pp 149-185. New York: Praeger.
1979b Witchcraft Models and the Andean Devil: Women and Witches in Colonial Peru Paper
presented at 43rd International Congress of Americanists, Vancouver, 1979
Spalding, Karen
1974 De lndio a Campesino Cambios en la Estructura Social del Peru Colonial. Lima lnstituto
de Estudios Peruanos
Taussig. Michael
1980 Folk Healing and the Structure of Conquest in the Southwest Colombian Andes Journal of
Latin American Lore 6(2).217-278.
Turner, Victor
1967 The Forest of Symbols. Ithaca: Cornell University Press
Tyrer. Robson B.
1976 The Demographic and Economic History of the Audiencia of Quito: Indian Population and
the Textile Industry. 1600-1800. Ph.D. dissertation. Department of History, University of Cali-
fornia, Berkeley.
Webster, Steven
1974-76 Factores de Posicion Social en una Comunidad Nativa Quechua. Estudios Andinos 11:
131-1 59.
Whitten, Norman E., Jr. (with the assistance of Marcelo Naranjo, Marcelo Santi Simbana, and
Dorothea S . Whitten)
1976 Sacha Runa: Ethnicity and Adaptation of Ecuadorian Jungle Quichua. Urbana. University of
Illinois Press.