z Geo-Solutions Soll & Groundwater Problems Solved, MIX DESIGN REPORT LAB STUDY CEMENT-BENTONITE L-31N LEVEE SEEPAGE BARRIER MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA. January, 2012 REF. NO.: P-L147Tabie of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION 11 opjective 12 TRCHNICAL APPROACH 13 LABORATORY TESTING 2.0 MATERIALS 21 MIXWATER 22. BENTONITE 23. CEMENT 24 SAND 3.0 SAMPLE PREPARATION 3a BENTONITE SLURRY MIXING 3.2. CEMENT-BENTONITE SLURRY MIXING 33. SAND ADDITION LAB STUDY 4.0 RESULTS 4.1 SLURRY TESTING 4:2 CURED CBSAMPLES 43. COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TESTING PERMEABILITY TESTING 44 PINHOLE DISPERSION TESTING 5.0 CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATIONS 10 101.0 INTRODUCTION ‘This document represents the final report for the laboratory testing program completed to evaluate the proposed Cement-Bentonite (CB) trial mixes. The purpose ofthe program was to determine ifthe proposed CB mixes will meet the project requirements for strength and permeability. One portion of the testing program included adding sand and water to two CB mixes to simulate actual field conditions encountered during the Installation of the test section installed in 2009. Another portion of the testing program evaluated two CB mixes ‘without the addition of sand to either mixture. 1.1 ORJRCTIVE The objective of this testing program was to develop a site-specific, CB backfill material for the seepage barrier along the L31N canal, adjacent to Everglades [National Park. The testing program was performed which included the following: Properties ofthe CB slurry to permit efficient pumping ofthe slurry; Proportioning of differing ratios of cement and bentonite; Permeability testing with a target value ofless than 9x 10 cm/sec at 28 days; Compressive strength testing with a target value of greater than 10 psi @ 28 days. 5. Investigate the impact of CB slurry with large amounts of saturated sand added. 1.2. TECHNICAL APPROACH For this testing program, the primary focus was to develop a CB slurry mix that ‘would have adequate fluidity, sample strength and permeability. The CB slurry was also tested for the ability to suspend saturated sand/gravels. Initially, two CB mixes were formulated for a lab study using sand addition. The frst mix (Mix #:) was similar to the mix used in the original test section (B/W=.054, C/W=.17). A second CB mix (Mix #2) added approximately 30% more cement and bentonite tc the original mix (B/Ws.07, C/W=22) in an attempt to overcome the additional water potentially introduced from the entrainment of saturated sand, Saturated sand was added to each of these mixes ata ratio of one part sand to two parts CB slurry, by volume, The samples were cured and taken to an offsite lab for UcS at 7 and 28 days, and permeability testing at 28 days. A second setof CB slurry mixes were formulated using differing bentonite additions, while holding the cement addition constant at 2296. These mixes were chosen based ‘on the results of the lab study with the addition of saturated sand, One mix (Mix #3) used a bentonite content of 5.4% and the other mix (Mix #4) used a bentonitecontent of 7%. Mix #4 was a duplicate of the mix #2 slur-y used in sand lab study. Both of these samples were cured and taken to an offsite lab for UCS at 7, 14 and 28 days, and permeability testing at 14 and 28 days. Pinhole dispersion testing was also performed at 7 days on each of the samples to determine the erodibility ofeach of the CB mixes. 1.2 LABORATORY TESTING ‘The lab study and the CB slurry mixing were performed by Geo-Solutions Inc. in New Kensington, Pennsylvania. The UCS testing, permeability testing and the pinhole dipersion testing were performed by Geotechnics of East Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. The primary emphasis ofthe lab study focused on the following tests and or material properties: ‘+ Fluid properties as measured by Marsh Funnel and mud balance (API 138). + Hydraulic conductivity as measured by triaxial permeameters + Strength as measured by UCS tests 2.0 MATERIALS ‘The materials used for the testing program were follows: 24 MIXWATER ‘The mixing water used for the laboratory study was Pittsburgh tap water. Bentonite slurry mixes were made using the Pittsburgh tap water, The Pittsburgh tay water ‘was previously tested and the properties are listed below: TargetValue Pgh Tap Water. pH 7s 75 TDs <1500 mg/L 2 Hardness $250 mg/L 131 ‘The test results of the tap water can be used as a background comparison to the canal water, should the bentonite slurry properties in the lab differ from those encountered inthe field using similar proportions. 22 RENTONITE ‘A sample of premium grade, 90 bbl yield, powdered bentonite was obtained from ‘Wyo-Ben Inc. (Hydrogel). The bentonite used for the previous test section was also.a 230 90 bbl yield bentonite, obtained from Federal Industrial Products (Fed Jel 90). The 90 EbI yield refers to the minimum amount of barrels (42 US gallons) of 15 centipoise (viscosity measurement equal to ~40 second slurry as measured through Marsh Funnel) slurry that can be created with one ton of bentonite, A 90 bbl yield bentonite is the standard material used for a majority of the slurry wall construction and grouting work performed in the United States, This bentonite complies with American Petroleum Institute 13A requirements 2.8 CEMENT ‘The cement used for the laboratory design mix was a standard Portland Type I /l powdered cement. For this project, Cemex will supply the cement. 24 SAND ‘The sand used for the lab testing program was medium-coarse sand purchased at a local supply store. ‘MIX SAND USED IN LAB STUDY SAMPLE PREPARATION 3a BENT ‘The initial bentonite slurry mixtures were made using the Pittsburgh tap water and Hydrogel 90 bentonite. The bentonite slurry used for the selected mixtures was at a B/W ratio of 054 for mix #1 and Mix #3, and.07 for mix #2 and mix #4 The initial bentonite slurry mixtures were prepared using a high-speed mixer uetil the abentonite and water were fully mixed, The mixtures were allowed to sit for a ‘minimum of one hour to allow for partis! hydration, similar to what is expected in the field. The bentonite slurry was then mixed again using the high speed mixer before the properties were tested and recorded. These tests included the Marsh Funnel viscosity and density MEASURING VISCOSITY AND DENSITY ‘The results ofthe bentonite slurry tests are as follows: Mitt BAW Ratio ‘Marsh Funnel Viscosity Density. 1 5.4% 43sec 645 pet 2 70% 57 sec 655 pet a 5.4% 42sec 64.5 pet 4 7.0% 5Assee 65.0 pef 3.2 CEMENT-BENTONITE SLURRY MIXING ‘The hydrated bentonite slurry was then used to make the CB slurry mixes. Cement ‘was added and mixed with the high speed mixer until the mix was homogeneous. Mix #1 was the same mix (B/W=.054, C/W=.17) that was used in the original test section installed in 2009. Mix #2 (B/W=07, C/W=.22) was formulated to reflect a 30% increase in the material quantities, which is expected to overcome the addition of water from the saturated conditions known to be present. Mix #3 (B/We.054, (C/W=.22) was formulated to compare the results to mix #1 using additional cement. Mix #4 (B/W=,07, C/W=22) was used to duplicate mix #2, with focus on the actual CB slurry properties without the addition of saturated sand, Each sample was tested for Marsh Funnel viscosity and density.‘The results ofthe CB slurry tests are as follows: Mixt = B/WRatio C/WRatio Marsh Funnel Viscosity 1 2 3 4 a3 [As part ofthe lab study, sand was introduced into CB slurry for mixes #1 and #2 in 4an effort to simulate what was encountered during the initial test trench. The sand ‘was a medium coarse sand that was oven dried, prior to the start of the lab study, to ‘remove the moisture content. Approximately 10 cm of dry sand was added to a 5- gallon bucket. This represented approximately 1/3 of the volume of the bucket. Water was added to the sand until the sand became completely saturated, In each sample, 1.9 liters of water was used to saturate the sand before the fresh CB slurry was added. In both samples of this portion of the study, this equates to adding MIXING AND TESTING CB SLURRY 5.4% 17% 7.0% 22% 5.4% 22% 7.0% 22% ‘SAND ADDITION LAR STUDY 75sec 176 sec 58sec 203 sec approximately 17% more water to the CB slurry mixes. Density 715 pot 735 pet 735 pet 735 petSAND/SATURATED SAND BEFORE CB SLURRY ADDITION CCB slurry was then added to the buckets until the total height of the samales were approximately 30 cm. The resulting samples represented approximately 2 parts CB slurry and 1 part saturated sand by volume. The sand and CB slurry were mixed together using the high speed mixer until the sand and water appeared to be ‘thoroughly mixed into the CB slurry. Each sample was tested for Marsh Funnel viscosity and density. The results of the CB/sand tests are as follows: Mix wsand —BAWRatio G/W Ratio Marsh Funnel Viscosity Density 1 5.4% 17% 44sec B84.0peF 2 7.0% 22% 125 see 920pef ‘Samples of the final CB/sand mixtures were taken and placed into Z-inch x 4-Inch ‘molds for laboratory testing for strength and permeability. The mixtures were allowed to sit fora minimum of one hour to determine ifthe sand would settle out of the CB slurry mixes. At that point, additional samples were made in tke plastic cylinder molds. One set was taken from the top of the buckets and another set was taken ‘rom the bottom of the buckets. These samples will be tested for strength at 7 and 28 days.(CB/SAND SAMPLES Clear tubes were also placed into the buckets to allow for visual observation of the cured samples. These tubes were removed from the buckets after 4 days of curing, OBSERVATION TUBES ‘There were no obvious differences in the amount of sand that either mix suspended when looking through the tubing. The tubes were cut in half to make another visual observation of the hardened CB/sand mixtures. It was difficult to determine if one ‘sample suspended more sand than the other. The bottom 10 cm and the top 10 em of the tube samples were washed through a #40 sieve to determine if one mix suspended more sand than the other by weight. The results were as follows: Mix Sand Retained on #40 Sieve vwsand — B/WRatio C/W Ratio Top1cm Bottom 10cm 1 5.4% 17% 208 288 2 709% 22% 28 298,‘TUBE SAMPLES 40 RESULTS ‘The properties ofthe slurry mixes, along with the cured CB sample results are presented in the following discussion, 44 SLURRY TESTING ‘As expected, the properties ofthe bentonite slurry, comprised of Hydrogel and tap ‘water, were typical. The viscosity and density Increased as the amount of bentonite increased. When cement was add to each sample, the viscosity and density also Increased accordingly. The workability of Mix #2 and #4 was atthe upper end of the viscosity that can be pumped over a long distance. When the saturated sand was Introduced into the CB slurry, the viscosity of both samples was reduced, due to the addition of water, and the unit weight of both samples was increased, due to the addition of sand.4:2 CURED CH SAMPLES ‘Lab Study with Sand Ater one day of curing, the bucket samples used in the sand lab study portion of the test program were examined fer the amount of "bleed" on each sample, Mix #1, which contained the lesser amount of bentonite and cement, showed approximately 1 om of bleed, which is approximately 3.5% by volume. Mix #2 which contained '30% more bentonite and cement had no observable bleed after one day. The molded samples were also examined forbleed and similar observations were made, bas CURED MIX #1 CORED Mix #2 The cured samples in the tubes showed that either mix could suspend sand when properly mixed. No notable settlement was observed in either sample, Mix Desion Mix #3 and mix #4 were also observed for any visual bleed after one day of curing, and no observable bleed was recorded, Both of these samples appeared to cure as expected for CB slurry, with minimal shrinkage. 4.3 COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH TESTING/PERMEABILITY TESTING ‘The molded samples were capped and cured. A minimum of six samples were made for each mix. For mix #1 and #2, the CB samples before the addition of sand were tested at 7 days for UCS and at 28 days for permeability. The other samples, after the addition of sand, were made from the top and bottom of the bucket after a minimum of one hour of curing time to ailow the sand to potentially settle. These samples were tested for UCS at 7 days and 28 days. For mix #3 and #4, each CB mix was tested at 7, 14 and 28 days for UCS, and at 14 and 28 days for permeability. The results ofthe laboratory testing are as follows; 9Ucs (psi) Permeability (cm/sec) pw __ cw __7day 14 28d: wai 23 m 0054 a7 403 37x10" Top 2a 6.82 Bottom Bas 994 ry 007 = 0.22 et Rar 10% Top ao7 17.48 Bottom 1.00 29.18 #8 ose 022 5.09 88.7 29x20 4.510 wa 0070022 aor ts8 1594 12x30 77x10 44 PINHOLE DISPERSION TESTING Per the project specifications, a Standard Pinhole Dispersion Test was performed for cach of the CB samples at 7 days. The pinhole test was performed on the samples from mix #1 and #2 that had sand added to the CB slurry. The testing for mix 43 and #4 were on pure CB slurry. The results ofthis laboratory testing showed no change 1m sample shape, and erodibility was not an issue in any ofthe samples. 5.0 CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the results ofthis program, a CB slurry mix with increased bentonite and cement will result in improved physical parameters for the completed wall. All of the samples with 22% C/W met the specified strength of 10 psi at 28 days. The sample with 17% C/W did rot meet this requirement. It should also be noted that the strength of the samples with sand (#1 and #2) increased with depth. ‘The CB slurry mixes with 7% B/W content met the requirements for permeability helng in the 10 m/sec range, while the samples with 5.4% B/W content did not. The results also indicate that permeability will decrease slighty as the samples cure. While the small scale tests with the addition of saturated sand did not show a significant éifference in sand-suspending properties of the two CB slurries, it is certainly presumable that the thicker slurry should perform better in this regard. We were able to establish that either mix would work if the sand is completely mixed with the CB slurry. The samples mixed without the addition of sand performed as expected. As Indicated with the lab data,‘more bentonite added to the CB slurry will provide better permeability results, and more cement will provide higher strengths, It is our intention to begin the barrier wall installation in the field with the thicker slurry (mix #2 and mix #4) and adjust, as appropriate, to achieve the project objectives. aUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH ‘echnics ASTM 02168067 AASITO T2605 osc Peak nd On (SOP 3) _ lent GEO-SOLUTIONS Boring No. saz Client Reference P4147 KROME AVE opin ct) Projet No. 2011-88001 ‘Sample No. LabiD 2011-880.01-03, Visual Descrigion: "GRAY CEMENT BENTONITE TRITIAL SAMPLE DNENSTONS WATER CONTENT AFTER TEST Length tem 3401 2007| [Tare No. 594 Length 20m) 3.338, 2021] wa Tare + WS.foms) 140.13, Leng 30m) 3.304 2.025] lw Tare+Dsioms) 197.92 lava tenatnen: 3.377 3.228] |. of Teretams) 80.80 Lx Moisture 87.34 UNIT WEIGHT lw. Tube & w5.coms) 2o786 ‘Sample Volume(e=) req lw. OF Tubotams) 2.00 Unit Wet we (gmsicc) 1.39 lw: or ws. coms) 25784 Unit Wet We (po) 93.48] Diameter cn) 203 Moisture Content, % 2734| eo) 338 Unit Ory Wot) 49.09 [Length (mn 358 ELECTRON DEVICE LOAD (bs) STRESS (psd Dae 1291 IPERMEABILITY TEST Genes ASTID 5084-03 (S0P-S22A & $228) ent GEO-SOLUTIONS Boring No. 122-11 Giont Project P1147 KROME AVE. Depth) Project No. 2011-559-01, Sample No, Lab ID Wo, 2011-569.0%-08 averace rerwcanury= §7E88GRmaLle °c AVERAGE PERMEABILITY = 3.7E-07 misec @ 20°C TOTAL FLOW vs. ELAPSED TIME 5 = g 2 ELAPSED re, re PORE VOLUMES EXCHANGED vs. PERMEABILITY eee g ze é Re VOLUMES EXCHANGED Testy: JOM ___Date-_‘2f8011_checke cate: 1-8 PaeTaT re oer me a 544 Braddock Averuo + East Ptsoug, PA 15112 + 412625-7000 + FAX 4124258000 + wowgnctectes itPERMEABILITY TEST eotechnics AST. 5084-03 (60-8224 8 8728) Cent seo-soLuTiONS BosingNo, 122-11 Client Proje P-1147 KROME AVE. Depth) #1 Project No. 2011-55901 SamploNo 2808Y LabIDNo, ——2011-889401-08 ‘pectic Gravity 270 Assured ‘Sample Constion Undistroad Visual Description: GRAY STABILIZED MATERIAL MoisTURE CONTENT: crore Test arven Test Tare Number we seo {it of Tre WS (om) saae 200 2 Vit of are 898 (om) tree tose ‘of Tare om) trozr aie ‘eof itera) ‘oor oss ww of BS gn) iB aes Moisture Cortet(%) 768 sa SPECIMEN: BEFORE TEST AFTER TEST Wt of Tue & ws (gm) aise wa Yt of Fuse (mm) 300 NA Ye of 9 eae Kom) rise 25081 erat (3 3078 20s tena 2 are beet eng 3 ites ber Top Dame (h) aes ‘eee Ide Barter) boas ‘a0 Bm amen) 488 1387 Average Length in) aor aoe “Average Ares (in?) 3.24 att ‘Sample Volume (om?) 163.20 151,83 Unit Wet Wi. (gm con® } 142 1.68 Unt et ee) ws wet Unt We et) oa sso Unit Dry WE gms cen? ) 080 0.86 Vora‘ 236 a Pores. 37 ace Pore Volume (cm® ) 114.6 1032 “ea Wit Sabet Tet wa Tesiod sy JOM Date 1a00111_chected ay; AC ate 15-12. PanTTT ne a ‘54 Braddock Avenue * East Ptsbuoh, PA 18112 + 412820-7600 + FAK 4128228009 + won geotchnis.natPERMEABILITY TEST edtechnics ASTRO 500403 recur ere (SOP-S22A & $228) “ cient ceo. sowurions BonrgNo. 122414 GlertProeet Peter KROME AVE Domi Fojecno Sorracbon SanpeN>. 28 08y tap'ione. —Zotrsseor4e Pressure Heads (Constant) Fina Sample Dinsions “ep capi oo Sompl Lange (em) 2s Beton ca () ‘00 Sane Det (om) 505 Cell (ps) 75.0 ‘Sample Area (em), A 20.07 “Total Pressure Head (cm) 703 Inflow Burette Area (om), ein 0.900 ‘Hydraulic Gradient 928 ‘Outflow Burette Area (em*), a-out 0.959 Parameter) 8 AVERAGE PERMEABILITY = 3.76.05 emfsoc @20°6 AVERAGE PERMEABILITY= 7607 misee @ 20% DATE TIME ELAPSED TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL FLON—_TEMP. INCREMENTAL Sue mievow currecw wean Pesueasurry 5 (Oto) rmrmicaiyy) the} (min) (he) {om® fem* fem) (tstop) (°C), wits) 0000 ou sso a we 2) oy 22 23 8 ts wore 2 7 02 63 a 0 ot wor 12 % 06 i888 tora 2 & 08 300 ons vere 2 a 68 2 2 0 vane 2 680 fet bas 1 te “Tested +2790 Checked By ACL TTT = ee S514 Braddock Avenue * East PSOUIGh, PATSTT2 * 412.829-7600 + FAK 412828-0999 + wn goolchnice atLUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH eotechnics RORY TEST AST 0216608 AASHTO T2005 eat Pak Lend On (SOP 6.) cient (GEO-SOLUTIONS Boring No, saat Cient Reference P1147 KROME AVE Depth gt) Project No. 2ott-s50.01 ‘Sample No. LapiD 2011-850.01-02 Visual Description: GRAY CEMENT SENTONITE. [INITIAL SAMPLE DIMENSIONS WATER CONTENT AFTER TEST luengtn 100 3.430 Top Dian) 2.010) are No. 286 lLenath 200) 3.506 Mid Dia. (in) 2.034 Tare + WSigms) 15304 lLength 300) 3.44 Bot Dia. (in) 2.010) lw. Tare +05.(0ms) 18292 JAva.Lenginan; 3.400 ‘Area in2) 3.205 Jw of Taream) 108.77 [x Moisture 9678 ‘Unit WEIGHT | Tube & ws.oms) 26558 Sample Volumeice) ssi] |w. of Tube(gms) ‘0.00 Unit Wet wt (ons) 146] lw. oF ws.cams) 265.58 Unit Wet Wee) 91.29 loiameter Gn.) 202 Moisture Cantor, % ee.re ILenath a 3.48 Unit oy wt sr) aaa Icongth (om) 370 EvecTRoc Device ‘Loa _srress| 9 e28tk! ‘Testeu By Jom aw {12/9/11_nput chokes (ege Td ecaascAten Ro ERE gh PA 1SHT2 = 4¥.9D9-7h0D + FAX 419.008 OCD TROR ARS RCAUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH ‘eotechnic: cient ceo-sowumions arn No rears Ghent rokrence PANT RROME AVE Dae) Proc Ne dorrseoon Saris oot aorrseeots atl Boscpton ABLUZED MATERIAL TAITACSRPLE DENSON WATERCONTENT AFTER TEST lens em) 3820 TopDia tay 2034 bare no 2083 smnacy Sse a aley 2004 lat'Tae-+W5\ons) 37808 [ignated Sze Bat Dn) lat reDsige) 2atot Inotengiwn) Sse eagn’s) 3 fat ceTertcms)” “eno Shure on aT WEG lv Tobe 8 ws ams) as sample Votre) 1264 lt ortavetoms 300 tne wet gc) ive het ows me} mrs Unt wets) asi Barnet 303 Mowsre Cer % ay Leng on 33 Une ete stad eng fem bos a vecrnowe oewee To sress 2 682 Testedy JCM ___Date 1200/11 nptChecedoy fk, Date 1-3-0 Re TO baa SPEER BrP Rcbueh, Pa tst12 + 492.028.7000 + FAX 412.22 TE AEP‘eotechnics LUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH heesesy bse ‘ASTI D208 G8) AASHTO T2085 stad Pek Loo On (SOP 8-8 Chent GEO-SOLUTIONS Boring No. 2m ‘Gent Reference PLA147 KROME AVE. Depth ch.) rojoct No. 2ot1-s88-01 ‘Sample No. Labi 2011-550-01-01 ‘Visual Description: GRAY CEMENT BENTONITE. TRITIAL SAMPLE DINENSTONS WATER CONTENT ‘AFTER TEST lLenath 10m) 3.422 Top Dia. (in) 1.974 [Tare No 03 Length 200) 3.445, Mid, Dia, Gn) 1.985) ln. Tare + Wsfoms) 188.11 Longin 30a) 3.418 Bot Dia (i) 4.989) Hw. Tare + DS.cams) 156.03 Javatenatnen; 3428, ‘Area (2) 3.078) Wt of Taretoms) 109.71 [6 Moisture 6232 “ONT WEIGHT \wr. Tube & ws.(gms) 268.81 ‘Sample Volume(ee) saa] Iw. OF Tube(ams.) 0.00 ‘Unit Wet Wfomsioc) 183 lw. Of ws.(oms) 208.81 Unit Wet Woe) 7.00] Joiameter Gn.) 198 ‘Moisture Content, % 62.32 Length ia) 343, Unit Ory Wp) 59:76| [Length (em. an ELECTRONIC DEVICE LOAD | STRESS (ps) 26 845 ‘Testud By Jc ate 120/11 ‘oe Ta eracanacneonst amma PA 1SHT2 » 417-823-700 FA 432.295 AOR ANNLUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH ‘eotechnics ASTI D218606/ AASHO T2086 asin ak Ld On (2830) cin eeosouuTions eon saan Gretretoone star naONe SE eon) Poste oreo Serpo ie Zor soo04 Teumoomspten: “Gee STABLZED MATERIAL TAC APE RR WATER CONTENT Arenas Lenn xn) 3578 Topi. tm) 200) arene ses tema) Soae 3a] nciwe-woiere) aosee swan) Soe dom) fctaesosgma douse Jotorattey S80 cotmy) 333] attend nS Meise 4 TT WERT lw Tues sans is sone Vaures) wo Mit arrests) cto tne ony we fac orws rs) an Ute er ae ona 22 Ware Coat ea re io Unto vip Sa eaten a sxecmone ocr Ting smess.o 2 os Tested By JCM Date 12/90/11 Input Checked By WL) Date V2 fae, SHAT TERE Poa, Pa tstt2 + 412823:7600 + FAK «12H ERT‘eotechnics LUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH cco aoe -AST.021506/AASNTO T20805 oss Pa Loi (20P 63 eat (GEO-SOLUTIONS Boring No. raat Cleat Reference ——_~P-1147 KROME AVE. Project No 2011 580.01 Labi 2011-859.01-09 [ INITIAL SAMPLE DIMENSIONS lLenatn 1m) 884 Top Diam) 2.005} |Longth 20m) 3651 Mid. Dia. (a) 4.999} fuengin 3¢m 839 Bo. Dia. ny 1.9921 lavaLengtngn; 849 ‘Area(in’2) 3.136) DRIT WEIGHT Tube & WS.(gms) 2008 ‘Sample Volume(ee) sere] lw. oF Tuberams,) 0.00, Unit Wet We (gmsice) 1.53) jw. oF ws.cams) 2809 Unt Wet (pet) 5.45 Diameter (in) 2.00 Moisture Content, % 7.03 ILenath On) 385 Unit Dey wot) 53.08 [Lengtn (om). 927 ELECTRON DEVICE LOAD ts) TRESS (ps) ested By JCM Date_12/10/11_Input Checked ‘a Taiteraseac rere amegh, PA IST?Client Client Project Project No LAID Ne. 00 TOTAL FLOW, em? PERMEABILITY, emisee $80 PERMEABILITY TEST Ge "Aur D 5008-03 ITEORTY wT (S0P-S228 8 $228) Geo-SoLuTioNs Boring No. 128-11 P14 KROME AVE, bepany 2011-560-04 Sample N 2011-569-01-12 oc 886-08 msec @ 10°C AVERAGE PERMEABILITY AVERAGE PERMEABILI TOTAL FLOW vs. ELAPSED TIME ELAPSED TINE, hrs PORE VOLUMES EXCHANGED vs. PERMEABILITY PORE VOLUMES EXCHANGED Tested By: JCM Date-_12/90/11_Checked By: pate: |-5.) PageTes 44 Bak Avenue * East burgh, PA 5112 + 412.629-7600 + FAX 412-429-6900 + wanegectecinis etPERMEABILITY TEST eotechnics ‘sim b suet us nam I EIN (SOP-S224 & $228) ent GEO-SOLUTIONS BorngNo. 128-11 Cent Project P-1147 KROME AVE, Deptn(t) #2 Prete, 2011-550-01, Sarple No. 28DAY LabIDNe, ——2011-550-01-12 Specie Gravity 2.70 Assumed Sarple Conctton Unlturoect Visual Descrpton: GRAY STABILIZED MATERIAL MOISTURE CONTENT: erone 185 arreR TEST Tare Number ane ‘00s Yet of Tae 8 WS om) wares oss We offre 808 (an) for ato We ottose for) 3520 oe vt often) nor so0ae verbs tom) ust 425328 Moisture Content (%) oy m2 SPECIMEN: AFTER TEST of Tbe & Sam) 570 Na WW. oF Tube) oo NA (of We (ele om) 2570 aso Leng tin) 2887 2937 Length 2m) ae 35 tens 3) rae aa10 Top Dametr (a) 1986 ia0e Ide amet a) 1 oe6 1388 Bator Daren) tose 1398 Average Length (in) 260 299 ‘Average Area (in?) 3.12 an Sompt Voume (or) 982 1830 tine user) or rr dhs Wet oe) tex ws Unt by Wt) os oe sty (em?) 80 tat Vou Rabo ‘ee ‘oe Porsty. 8 a6 8 Pore Voue (en?) toa 3 ‘oa Wg. OF Same tar Tost 28 Tess 5y: eM __bato:_200t_checkeay ——R_—_—_oate_ IBD. FamTTS eT Sa ‘44 Braddock Avenue + East Ptsouph, PAISI12 + 412808-7600 » FAK 412.805.8909 + we goctchic netPERMEABILITY TEST ASTM D 208603 eotechnics (SOP-$22A 4 $228) tent (Geo-SOLUTIONS CGient Project P-1147 KROME AVE. Project No 2011-560-01 LabIDNo.—_2011-550-01-12 Pressure Heads (Constant) Top Cap (8) vd Betiom Cp (ps) 70.0 Cel ins 750 Total Pressure Head (om) 1055 ycraute Gradient waar Boring No. 12-311 Depth) #2 Sample No 28 DAY Final Sample Dimensions Sample Length (em), L rag Sample Damete em) 506 Sample Area (mn), A 2007 Infiow Burete Area (er), ain oes ‘Outew Burts Aa (em), a-out oe B Parameter (6) 97 AVERAGE PERMEABILITY= 8.86:06 emisec @ 20°C AVERAGE PERMEASILITY= 8.86.08 miec @ 20°C DATE TIME ELAPSED TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL «FLOW TEMP,_ INCREMENTAL “TIME INFLOW OUTFLOW HEAD PERMEABIUTY t (Ow) emda) (olay ye” (om _tomy tsp) 0) waz fs) 0000" 00 wsa 098 wwe 2 6 02 18 47 sa ot wr 2 % 06 64 = O87 0 tee vere 2 @ 08 80 B12 0 iBB yor? 12 2 08 92 94 1085 o 88 wore 19 0 11 04 1081058 oa wore 13 8 120 13S t039 o 88 vane % % 13° Be Re HOD 1 98 Testedy: JCM __Date_s2/50'1_checkes sy WL bat 4-4 D0 Faget aT Tar Tar ont Sno reneore —— 544 Braddock Avenue Pits, PA 15112 412.828.7800 + FAX 612-628.6909 + vor geoeUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH echnics ‘ASTVA.02168-06 / AASHTO 208-5 (Moctied-Peak Load Only) (SOP $-30) i wom cet 2€0.s0uTIONS anno No raat Stent Rofrence 5:47 KROME AVE Dovtn tt) Prot no. eriss001 Sample No Capt 2o1185601-00 Visual Description: GRAY CEMENT BENTONTE TRITIAL SAMPLE DIMENSIONS Juan 4m) 3741 Tapia. (my 1.909 lesan 20) 378. iam) 1.988 lian om) «3787 Bou aim ta8t JAvotenmmon, 3748 ean’) 3.009 ‘WAIT WEIGHT lm. Tube & ws.oms) 2ar8 Sample Vounetes) 1904 [we orrubocans) 00 Unt Wet Wome) 154 hm orws gms) zara Unt wet oe). 9433] loiameter tind +9 Nossture Content, 6 %, sna 374 Un Ory We 5837 erat om ast euscrrowe bewee ton) sreess| 25 “a07 a “Testes By JOM Date 12/10/11 Input Checked By WL _ate_12-19-\\ Fe TOT aRNNON™ PRP 6T2 = 412287600 = FN 412 2 ORION SAEUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH eotechnics ASTI 0216608 AASHTO 20610 Meas Pos Lind On SOP ©) lent GFO SOLUTIONS Boing No any Cent Reference at 47 KROME AVE Desth Project No 2orrss61 Sanple No ioe ponanoort Vs Bseoton: GRAY STABLIZED MATERIAL TRITIAL SAMPLE DIMENSIONS WATER CONTENT AFTER TEST erat in 3.689, opie (a) 1.089 [rare no 500 length aim) 3500, MO. (n) 1989 lw Tare + ws gms) 202.9 ling aim) 3586 Bot ie (a) 1.909 ha Tare 05(gms) 240.08 Javetengivay 3605 dean’) 3.0a9 we ofTareigms) aa 7t ls mostre rea TAT WEIGHT hut Tube & ws (ams) a8 Sample Voune(ce) se26| lat OF Tube(ame) oa Unit et gmste) 152 we orws gms) oa Unt et Weise) 9439 Diameter in) 198 Moisture Content, % ire Leman) a6 Unt oy wiper} sai Lena (om) a1 sxecrnowe Device LOAD (By) STRESS os) 54 17.48 Tested By _JcM Date 1200/11 InputChecked By Date 1-39.12. PTO oa, ESSER as TEER Pouch, PA S112 « 612-828. 7800 + Fax 412 2 SSE TAREE RRLUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH technics ‘ASTI 02168.08/ AASHTO T2805 Mode Peak Lond On (SOP 830) eiialiied Giient GEO-SOLUTIONS Boring No. 12311 Giiont Reference P4147 KROME AVE, Depth Projeat No, 2o11-550-01, ‘Sample No. Labi 2011-559-01-07 ‘Visual Description: 'Y CEMENT BENTONTTE | TRITIAL SARPLE DIMENSIONS WATER CONTENT ‘AFTER TEST [Length 1m) 3.678 TopOia. (a) 1 [Tare No. 876 [cength 2Gn) 3.685, Mig. Dia. Gr) 1.988] |W Tere + WS.(gms) 169.70 Icongth 360) 3.683 Bot. Dia. (in) 1.986) Tare + DS.(gms) 143.57 lAvaengtnin, 3.682 ‘Atos (n'2) 3.082 of Tare(ors) 109.97 [9 Moisture mn UNIT WEIGHT Tube & WS.gms), 202.47 ‘Sample Volume(co) 106.5 lw. of Tubetomes) 0.00 ‘Unit Wet We (gmsicc) 187] lw. oF ws coms.) 202.17 Unit Wet Wp.) or) [Diameter dn.) 4:98 ‘Moisture Content, % rn| [Length ¢n.) 3.68, [Unit Ory W(t) 54.99| [Length (em, 9.35 ELECTRONIC DEVICE {LOAD (bs) STRESS (pa) “Tested By _JCM Date_12/10714 Ingut Checked By _ WC) _bate 2.49 ‘ae TSE racean PENSE™ REE PREDEG, PA ISTT2 © AT2B23-7600 + FAX 412-805-008 AMARUEERET ESUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH eotechnics AST 02165.05/ AASHTO 1708-10 asta Pak Lead On (SOP) Client GEO-SOLUTIONS Boring No. vant lent Reference P1147 KROME AVE Deoin it) Project No. 2011-550-01, Semple No Leb ID 2011-889.01-10 Visual Description: /ABILIZED MATERIAL, TAITTAL SAMPLE DIMENSIONS WATER CONTENT AFTER TEST Length (my 3.856 Top ia. (in) 4.989] [rare No 586 Length 2¢r) 3.652 Mid Oia. (my 1987] Jw Tare+ws.(gms) 968.88 Length 3m) 3.850 Bot Dia (in) 1.967] Jun Tare +DS(gms) 240.02 JavgLengthin) 3.683 Area (in?) 3.128 lw. of Taretgms) 8221 Ls Moisture 71.86 UNIT WEIGHT lw. Tube & ws (gms) 28124 ‘Sample Volume(cc,) 1872] wt Of Tube(gms) coo ‘Unt Wet it fomsice) 153) lw. Ors coms.) 28724 Unit Wet We (oot) 95.79 Diameter in} 200 Moisture Content, % 7188| Length (im) 285 Unit Ory We (pet) 85.70 Length om 928 ‘ELECTRONIC DEVICE LoD oe) srnes (2) 60 e918 Tested By _JOM Date 12/00/11 Input Checked By YC Date_\~5 200 T OF, sPRASESEA ERE PELE Pouch, PA ASH12 + 412-829-7000 + FAX 472 <6 OP REELSLUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH ‘ASTM O26 08/AASHTO T2810 fad Pood Os) (BOP 9) ‘eotechnics Zine SER a a Sra Too aren se leon iar tom ae (et ina ie eaaes = rates, fi aces = seen a ee, Fe ELECTRONIC DEWCE LOAD tb STRESS (os) Tested By AC ave ToT RESEPEETBcarh, Ph 15112 + «1225 7eC0 + Bax eA 16 809 Date 1222/11 input Checked weeotechnics UNcoNriven coMPRESSIVE STRENGTH sou mem ‘Asm cziboe/ AHO 2 gated Pete Om) BOP 3) chet ceo.so.uT0Ns sont ” GlertRetwerce PASAT HROME AVE Sopot) ea emt mortar Stoo RO, oe Bete i Coton ——. TA SAUPLE DENTONS 1 ware CONTE — aren Tear lenawscn 9780 topo. tate) ram oes tewnae, See telat) Tame] Asien) 098 lgnasy ame eae) tame] om rawsoeggi? | BZ latent) 37ot eaten) Sato] caftognl™ eae Iva 28 Ta WET la rte 215 may man ems Mit ota 000 ceresinoecy Mi ore aise vorwerw eas once vs Wet a tera iB Uo oe Le, Ba | eee _. (ion os 28 (899 Tested By Ck Date 1272011 Input Checked ay WG __oate_19-S)-4) 100 Tg PRESALE Pgh PAIS2 + ai2gceEnn + SAC Ha RIT ROTO‘ectechnics LUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH ASTM D2188-06 AASHTO T208-10 (Mofilad Peak Load Oy) (SOP $30) es rent e0-souuTIONs Bongo sans lest Reterence Pita RROMEAVE Dope) Pree No ates Same No, He dor s80.2.08 Visual Deserpton: GRAY STABILZED MATERIAL TRVTIAC SAWPLE DIIENSTONS WATER CONTERT AFTER TEST lengtsfa) 3.549 Top Dla dn) 2.004 rar io 1522 Lenat2ie) 3.542 Mek ai). Nit Tare+ Wis (ors) 22088 letatn) 340 Bat in) 1a lit Tae D8.gms) 62.83 Javgtengtnin) 3642 Arona) 28 |W of rertoms) oer - betel 20264 — TRIT WEIGRT Inn ruse ws.come) 2459 SanpieValmeten) seis] Inn Ortube(ame) 0.00 Unt et gms nua Int ors ons) 2439 ‘Unt wet ipe) naire (lamate (in) 200 oistire Cote, % 2264 natn) as ator wept) 1023) Leng (om) 30 sxscraome pevice Ton fa) STRESS psi 39 12.47 __Tested 8y JAC Date 1/12/12 Input Checked Cate 2 ‘asa atlas Area EAR Piha, PA 5312 + 612.623.7800» Fax ane BOON GSOasm $004.08 secu neo PERMEABILITY TEST Geae (S0P-s22k 4 $228) cient Geo-sowuTioNs Baring No. Cont Projet alia7 KROME AVE. Depth (t) Projet No 2ortsss02 ‘Sample LabI0 Ne, 2o14550.02.08 AVERAGE PERMEABILITY [AVERAGE PERMEABILITY. aga are ere TOTAL FLOW vs. ELAPSED TIME m8 2 we ELAPSED TIME, bre PORE VOLUMES EXCHANGED vs. PERMEABILITY : we Emo E toner oo oo) PORE VOLUMES EXCHANGED Tested JCM __Date: 1272911 _Checkesty: WW _oate_1-5 49. Payee Torro Bn Sere Reins ew ne rnanay ba ‘Sti Bradock Avenue + Eat Pitbugh, PASH + 4128037600 = FACAIEAE HBO we gasketPERMEABILITY TEST ‘eotechnics ASTID 5084-03 'SOP-822A 8 $228) cent Geo-sowuTions Bog No. 1245-11 Cent Project P1147 KROME AVE. Depth.) Mc Projecto, 2011-580.02 Sample No. 14 CAY LabID No. 2047-589-02.0¢ Specie Grauty 2.70 Assured ‘Sample Condon Unastixood VieualDescrpton: GRAY STABILIZED MATERIAL ‘MOISTURE CONTENT: BEFORE TEST AFTER TEST Tate Number 554 eo Wot Tare & WS (om) 2434 526.25, Wt of Tere 08 (em) i800 2190 Wi of Tare (gr) e103 23.20 of Water (ar) 105.04 30836 We of 0S om) 3737 4138.70 Hosatze Content (4) m3 n04 ‘SPECIMEN: BEFORE TEST AFTER TEST ot Tube & WS (gm) use NA tof Tube (em) 0.00 NA of WS (eat Kam) 445.79 37133 Length #() 3197 ‘3318 Length 2(n) 3.198 3198 engi 3 tn) aig7 3.06 Top Dieter fn.) sos 300s Middle Oot (a) 3.031 3.005 Botton Dimetra) 3.009 3.009 ‘Average Length tn) 320 320 ‘average Area (a?) m2 8 ‘Semple Volum (or?) srrar arrs0 ‘nit Wet Wm?) 118 ose Unt Wet wa. (pet) 138 814 Unit ry (et) 192 192 nity WH (a em?) o3t ost Void Rati, 178 mm Porosity oa ae Pore Value (em?) sua aus Tota! Wat Of Sole Afr Test anus Tess 8y: JCM _Dale:_1228/1_Checkos By: Date: 1-6 geTaTS Taro a {54 Braddock Avenue + Eas PRb ah, PA S112» $12423.7600 + FAX AIEAZOEROD + wage ntPERMEABILITY TEST eStechnics ASTM 8084-03 NTEGITY IN TESTS Serszina sas) cient eo.souurions Boing No. 2844 Siartroject etter etowe AVE Seon tt) xo Precio dort seen Sanpieto, teDAY tptcne. —Zernsseczea rina Sample Cimenstons Tepcie oe 00 sarge tora on). ax Bote Co =) no Surete Deco) 10 Call (psi) 75.0 ‘Sample Area (om*), A 48.41 ‘Total Pressure Head (cm) 70.3 Inflow Burette Area (cm? ), a-in 0.891 ‘Hydraulic Gradient 8.64 Outflow Buretie Area (em*), a-out 0915 SP arareter ” [AVERAGE PERNEABIITY= 296-05 omisee@ 20°° AVERAGE PERMEABILTY® 286-07 mises @ 20 ORE WE ELAPSED TOTAL, TOTAL TOTAL FLOW TEMP. _INOREMENTAL TIME INFLOW OUTFLOW WEA PERMEABLITY C . ‘ozre (m__ fem" (om comp vee) jag a8 00 00 063 ina 2 @ 08 27 a8 or aazos in B® of 4 Syme aieos ina fo 01 7) 93 Soees jam a 02 ao 8 me aaeos io 4B @ 0s ms 7 ose bees jam af t¢ toe nee doeoe jee Bs be ts war ites Tested By. JCM Date: 12/29/11 _Checked By. iS VS Tata oo SE 524 Brack vere * East Pburh, PASTE + 4124207600 + FAX 12-29 900 + wuwegoleciic etLabIONo, PERMEABILITY TEST ag ASTMLD 2094-10 peanror vera (60-8224 4 5226) GeO-SoLUTIONS Boring No, 1246.14 LIMA KROME AVE, open (t) 2orvsse02 Semple No 2014 589.02-05 AVERAGE PERMEAGILITY # oC AVERAGE PERMEABILITY= 1.8 ee @ 20°C TOTAL FLOW vs, ELAPSED TIME TOTAL FLOW, em? ELAPSED TIME, hrs PORE VOLUMES EXCHANGED vs. PERMEABILITY PERMEABILITY, emisge 0807 PORE VOLUMES EXCHANGED Tested By JOM Date: i202 Checked By. _Y__Date:_|-}8-1D- Pages 54 Broddack Avenue» Eau Pitsburg PASI » 4126987600 + FAXATBEZENIO + waogeotcha nePERMEABILITY TEST Si technics TaD soe t0 BOPSAAR S225 ent Gco-sowTieNs Borng No. 124541 (Cie Project P-1147 KROME AVE Dept) wa Projecto 2011-860-02 Semple No. 2808Y LaIO No, ——201-550-02.05 ‘Speeine Gravy 2.70 Assumed ‘Sample Condition Undated Visual Desrtion: GRAY STABILIZED MATERIAL MOISTURE CONTENT: BEFORE Test AFTER TEST Tare Numbee 540 a We of Tere & WS (om) rsa 545.95 Wt ef Tare 8 DS (gm) 123.98 e724 We of Tae (gm) 83.5, 100 wi of Weer (am) 110008 271 Wf D8 (am) wont 25.94 iatre Content (4) aaa ot ‘SPECIMEN: AFTER TEST of Tube 8 is (om) NA ot Tube (gm) NA tof WS cai gm) 226.70 Length 4 Gn) 35 Length 2m) 316 Length 3 (in) 35 Top Diemator (in) 8080 Middle Oameter (rn. 3008 Bottom Diameter (in) 3010 ‘Average Length (i) ai ‘vorage Area (in*) 149 ‘Sample Volume (em) 6708 Unt Wet We (nem) ose Unt Wet We (Bet) Bs Unit ry (pet) 22 Une by Wa. (gem?) 032 Void Ratio, 735 Pores, = o8e Pore Velume (em?) m4 “esata Of Sarole Ar Test 444 led By: JCM __Date: 1/1242 _Chockas By: Date: o aT [4 Bincdook Avenue East Pastor. PAYEE + 4126257000 + FAKATZEZS ERE » wun attenPERMEABILITY TEST ‘eotechnics ‘ASTM D 5084-10 (S0P-S224 8 8228) smideue’ cient GEO-soLUTIONS Boring No 32-15-11 Cont Project P1147 KROME AVE Depth) Mx3 Projecto. 2011-869-02 Sample No. 28DAY LapiONa, —2041-860-02.08 Pressure Heads (Constant) Final Sample Dimensions Top Cap (ps) 520 ‘Sample Length er), 79 Botiom Cap (ps) m0 ‘Semple Diameter (tn) 788 ots) 750 Sample Ara (em), 438 Tota Pressure Heo (om) 703 Tron Burts Area (em), an 0.90 HyoreueGrasent 888 (Outtow Burt rea (er), 8out 0888 Parameter (%) 99 AVERAGE PERMEABILITY®= 1.56.05 emisoc @ 20°C AVERAGE PERMEABILITY 1.56.07 misee @ 20°C OATE TIME ELAPSED TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL. «FLOW TEMP. INCREMENTAL TIME INFLOW OUTFLOW HEAD PERMEABILITY 1 how) exc recap) (ne) (in) te) (om fem tom) 1380p) (0) __—_ervsee) weia 1-8 0000 90a ° 3 NA men2 1 1 0200 502m o 395 1805 wen 1 2 03 88 RAT ° 5 15E08 we 3 04 Mae 3 ‘es tee08 wena 11 430815315258 2 195 1805 were 1 53 08 83 tez tw 2 195 18E05 wan? 11 58091785 as > 1951505 wien 2 4 10 30 oO aa 3 195 teE08 Tested By: JOM. Date: 112/12 Checked By: A Date: {-|8-19- Paes Gert ave ae near EaTErRcaeienoy I KI ‘544 Braddock Aeron + Eat Pisa, PA 18112 + 20237000 + FAXAIOAR- = wm eect neUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH ‘eotechnics AST D218 AASHTO T2080 nes Pak Land Oi GOP 0) tent ‘ceo sownons Borng a saris ‘lent Reference Pata KROME AVE Deptt) Proc te aorvasoue Samp No. tio zortss6206, aval Deston STABILIZED MATERIAL INITIAL SAMPLE DIMENSIONS WATER CONTENT ‘AFTER TEST lence see) 60 Top Dia. fm) 2008 Haro. es lenge 2m) Seo Om) 0 Yat Tare wsgms) 90551 lng ain) a0 «Bet Data) 983 jt tae + Dsems) 144.00 Javguenaiviny 300 Nea) 39 jt otrartemsy 338 Lemoine 20035, UNIT WEIGHT lar Tape & ws.ors) 205 Sanpie Vouresee) 1253] bt or Tusetamsy ow Ur Wet ware) ‘a hi or wes(ome) 208 Unt Wet Weipa) 7394 ameter) 20 Mose Content 22038) Leng Gen) 300 Unt Dry Wiper) 1903 (en) - 255 suzcrrowe oevee LOAD to) s1Ress ps) 28 (892 Tested By _JAC Dato 1222/11 Input Cracked By WC Date AN 908° OT sug BASRA PERT, PA C12 + 412-425-7600 + FAX ITT ONEcent Gent Reference Project No bio LUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH ‘ASTM UEIES28/AASHTO T2109 Peak 0e On} (SOP 630) (seo-sowumions P-4147 KROME AVE 2ovtssea2 2015550.02.07 Bating No Depih(t) ‘Sample No. Visual Description ‘eotechnics ransiis STABILIZED MATERIAL TNT SAMPLE DIMENSIONS length ce) 8a length 2m) 3.833 Leng atm) 3.24 ‘Top Dia (in) 1.08) Miia. in) 1,982 Bot Dis. fr) 989 rare No [Wi Tare +WS.(ms) 318.72 lw Tare+ DS(gms) 147.80, ‘WATER CONTENT — AFTERTEST 604 lava Lengtniny 3.834 ‘area ('2) 3.19) We of Tartgms) erty [I Meise 27608 f ONT WEIGHT 1 Tube & WS. (me) 23321 Sample Volume(ea) 196] lw. oF Tubetams,) 0.00 Unt We We fomsioc) 1g we oF ws (gms) 23321 ‘Unt Wet Wee) ra [Diameter (in) 198 Moisture Conte 276.) Length 38 Unit Ory Wiper) 1972 onath (om) ars ELECTRONIC DEVICE TOAD fs STRESS fos) “ected beae 11D, GAMER IRS PRAT Purp, Paste» are cK 36 Bote 127005 Inout Checked 8 UC owe 12-904 THO © FAK 12 BLOT RTOLUNGONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH ‘eotechnics ‘ASTM 0218636 AASHTO T2080 Pend Pk Lind On) OP 699) tent ‘seo.souunons Bea Ne GtentReternce Pear KROME AVE epi) Prose Ne aovso02 Sampo tee Sos9-02.08 Vaal Deion: “GRAY STABILZED MATERIAL TRITAL SRHPLE DOTERSTONS WATER COwTENT AFTER TEST lense soy 9582 «= Topoa.cm) 20m are No 40 lensh ai) 31a atm) 2000 lwetare+Ws.ors) 22458 lergm te) 3.586 Bak Om) 08 lwe tare DSigme) 6450 [avptergee) 3583 et) tae lweertarorsy “873 eioanre ae RIT WEIGHT ha Tae & ws fame) nee sample Vourees) 1042] lat Orato) 00 Un et omc) 9 le Orws cane) nae Unk Wet We (pa 7409 [tte (m) 200 Nottie Contant Feel Lena) 3s Und Woe) ‘a. Leng fom) a0 xscrrome oewce ono ts Rss ps 80 (15.94 ‘Tested By JAC Date 122 InputChecked ay f{ date} “)3-19 ba0e OF Loe ARASESR ARE ELA Widcugn, Pa 1Si2 + 49-820:7600 + Fax ate AER a GEERint CientProet Project Na, LapioNo, PERMEABILITY TEST 0% technics ‘ASTM 0 508-08 (Smsva nz) Geo-soLurions: Boring No. PaltaT KROME AVE. Depth (2) 2ovssse02 Sample No 2011880.02-09 AVERAGE PERMEABILITY = AVERAGE PERMEABILITY = TOTAL FLOW vs. ELAPSED TIME a ELAPSED TIME, We PORE VOLUMES EXCHANGED vs. PERMEABILITY Totes PageTas 40 Brook ava rT FORE VOLES EXCHANGED ou oom wows omeaty. RC own | of f+ Eon Psu, PA SHI2 + 612-429-7600 + FAX AIRAPRAR » wan cotecnicentPERMEABILITY TEST ‘eotechnics ‘ASTM D 08445 (soP.sz7na 5728) cient oe0-soLuTiONS. Boring No. 12-18-15 (Gent Proest Pel t47 KROME AVE, epi t) mcs Projecto. 2011-550-02 Samgieto. 4 DAY CapID No 2041-558-02.09, ‘specre Gravy 270 Assuee ‘Sample Gondlion Undeturved Views Description: GRAY STABILIZED MATERIAL MOISTURE CONTENT: BEFORE TEST AFTER TEST “Tare Number ere of Tare & WS (@m) 728.08 vk ofTare & 05 (om) ar ‘of Tare (om) 1056 Wt otter erm) 08.36 Wt S108 (gm) 3178 Moisture Content) zo SPECIMEN: BEFORE Test AFTER TEST 1. of Tube & 95 (om) 437.08 NA We of Tbe (gm) 0.00, NA WE of WS (eae om) 43708 «308 Longth (2) 3132 3107 Lengts 2) an 3108 Leng 3a) a2 3103 ‘Top Dametee (n) 3028 5014 Md Olamote (in) 3.086 aoa Batlm Olamstr in) 3.040 5018 ‘Average Lergtn (in) 32 an ‘Average Are in") 123 76 ‘Sample Velume (er?) 37008 36351 ‘rat ieee) sa 449 Unt wiet (pet) 737 745 Unt ry (et) 195 98 Unity We (gem) ost 032 Void Rao, 782 Tar Pores, 2 ose 088 Pore Volume (em?) srt 08 Tel! Wat OF Sompe Aer Test 4309 Tested ty: JOM _Date:_12729/11_ checked By ates_| Page Tae Tore Tie vee © wT eRe SET 4 adsock Avene * Gea PiDUIGh PA SH2 © 12-29-7600 » FAX EI-EOSAIHA « wane geletni nl‘eotechnics Final Sample Dimensions 109 768 48.00 0.901 oars 7 INCREMENTAL PERMEABILITY ec lomvese) 10-05 10505 1005 98608 986.05 196-05 49608 PERMEABILITY TEST ASTM 5084.03 (S0P-522A 4 8228), Cent ‘ec0-SOLUTIONS Boring No. 42-15-11 CGient Project P1147 KROME AVE Depth) Min Projet. 2017-560-02 Sample No. 14 DAY LapiD No, 2911-$80-02-09 Pressure Heads (Constant) ‘Yop Cap (ps) s00 ‘Sample Length (em). Botim Cap (ee) 700 Samp Dametr (em) Col os) 750 Sample Area (er). Total Pressure Head (em) 703 Indow Bute Area (en?) 9 Hyeraute Gradient Bat Outow Burtt Area (or). out B Parameter (%) AVERAGE PERMEABILITY= 1.06.05 emisec @ 20°C AVERAGE PERMEABILITY» 1.06.07 msec @ 20°C DATE TIME ELAPSED TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL «= FLOW TEMP, TIME INFLOW OUTFLOW HEAD ‘ (0 few) (reed) (min) dhe) iow” on™ tem) top). “aie 2-8 000000 B43 oe wig 2 08 8892 rak ° 198 weno 47 O77 at ° 198 wiz 2 M08 | 83138 es ° 198 viz 13 2 0881155 oT ° 168 wiz 13 8 10 636780 ° 138 wore 13 11878 ° 198 ww. 13 13 9399S 1 198 ‘Tested By: _JOM 4212811 Checked By: WL Date: j- §~| PageTas ‘Sut Braddock venue + Fal Pb, PA1Si12 * 4526287600 * FAX 12-22.8009 «wn galanin‘ent Cont Project Project No LaBID No ‘TOTAL FLOW, em? ‘ASTM D 808410 pero rte (60P.8224 8 5278) Ge0-soLuTions Boring No P1147 KROME AVE. Dean (n) 2oti-sso-2 Sale No 2011-856.02.40 PERMEABILITY TEST Civics AVERAGE PERMEABILITY T7608 mises @ 20°C ‘TOTAL FLOW vs. ELAPSED TIME a PERMEABILITY, emisec ELAPSED TIME, hrs PORE VOLUMES EXCHANGED vs. PERMEABILITY FE ee 300 oor oc oo ou ry 08 PORE VOLUMES EXCHANGED Temed ey: JCM __Date:_vi2/12_checkes By: UC ate: 1-16-12. eT 544 Brack Avera» East Paahugh, PA IS12 + 4128207800 + FAK 12-428 8000 - wan geotce nePERMEABILITY TEST technics ASTM D 5084-10 (S0P-S228 4 5228) tent geo-sowumicns Boring No 92-15-19 Cent Projet 2.1147 KROME AVE. Dest) Mics Projecto 2011-550-02 Sample No, 28 DAY Labib No 2041-866-00-18 Soveie Geaty 270 Assumed ‘Samate Condition Undeturbes Visual Detention: GRAY STABILIZED MATERIAL MOISTURE CONTENT: BEFORE TEST AFTER TEST Tore Number 5 1004 We of Tare & WS (om) ‘691 535.08 Wk of Tee &DS (gm) 11348 3079 i. of Tare gm) 227 5361 Wor Water (om) esas 193.27 We of DS (om) aon 28.18 Moise Content (16) ant 184 ‘SPECIMEN: BeroRe Test AFTER TEST of Tube 8 WS (om) saa NA of Tube (om) 0.09 Na of WS ea Kem) asaaT 2483 Length 4 Gn) 3236 3202 Length 2 (in) 328 3226 Length 3 in) 3247 3245 Top Diamar.) 3034 3028 idle mater.) 304 3024 Bottom Diameter) 3030 3028 Average Length (n.) 324 ra ‘average area (in) 1 718 ‘Sample Volume (em?) 8407 weisa Unit Wee wg em") 118 086 Unit Wet We (Bet) 133 351 Unity Wt (pet) 109 200 Unt Or (rae?) 032 a3 Vola Ratio, ¢ 148 742 Prosi 8 088 oa Pore Volume (em?) ssa sae “etal Wat OF Samote Afr Test 4505 som ba Testes by Date: V2 _ Checked By ‘524 Bracdook Avenue * Eat Pbuah, PA ISH» 41223-7600 + FAX 412423000 «war gst naPERMEABILITY TEST feotechnics tent Geo.soLUTIONS Cont roject__P-1147 KROME AVE. ProjeNo. 2017-85002 LepIONe, §——2011858.02-10 Pressure Heads (Constant) ‘op Crp (oa) ens, Botts Cap (ps) 700 cel es 750 Total Pressure Head fe) 1055 Hydrate Gradient i282 AVERAGE PERMEABILITY AVERAGE PERMEABILITY ‘ASTID 5086-10 yesnibis (s0P-s22A 4 8229 pensar orien Boring No. 12-18-11 Depin ) Me Sample No. 280A Final Sample Dimensione ‘Sample Leng fem oz ‘Sample Diameter (em) 753 Sample rea (er), A ast Infow Buta Aza (om), on ose Ouitow Burts Area (em), ut 0.904 8 Parameter) 95 1TE96 emisec @ 20°C 7 7E.08 misee @ 20°C DATE TIME ELAPSED TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL FLOW TEMP. INCREMENTAL TIME” INFLOW OUTFLOW HEAD PERMEABILITY t m— (0few) auc emvesy) (9 (ey totem” ten” tery ftp) (0) free) view ns 0999 00s a mez i % 02 38 35 mS terse mo i 25 03 83 2 estes TE mez HS 0s 84 BaD) tS 2E mew HO 08 8 5 wee Dt TaEe mow M5 08 45 wats Dts 786 ie i 58 08 88 ss Seo D185 Tae wo i 4 4000 3 hae 4 M88 ae Testes by awe 22 cnecked by. C = 18-1 PayesTT Tera TAT CET wa SRT 546 Back Aveo + East Petaburgh PA 1512 + 41289-7000 + FAX 412620800 we gchareotechnics PINHOLE DISPERSION TEST ‘ASTM D4647-05{ SOP-S80) ion £0 SoLUTIONS, Ne Boing, 121811 Ghent Retaerce P47 KROME AVE Deo — Propet no bo sa San Ne too onvsence Vout GRAY STABL.ZED MATERIAL Taro, set WiocTae + Wet Specmen(gm) 11868 rurewrry Wittae sn Spoomen ton) 1438 vo. veny oan Weis! Tare or sae Doar ‘Wott Water gm) 40 NNO” MODERATELY OA Waar ofr Specimen on) i168 0 -suiciTLY DARK By BARELY VSBLE Ver Coot 05 6 COMPLETELY CLEAR ny Denay gb Meo A Poattow bam tn) Cecsteaion NonotsPensive Clock Head Flow ow Rate Tuiaty Turia emacs ‘Tne Tate From Side From Top (nt) (ese) (meee) (Choose rom the above et) wo 2 7 Se bap op co wee ep a “om eo ee 20 ez we Le Loss co «eo «SURGE -RUNTOMNUTES were sr “om co ee fea” 2 eo ow co «eo Nocunr nenEASE TED A = B le Le Te pas ze os co eo teas @ ~a~ Moe “eo oo =o ro a ea ee % = ea Fa ise cs 1280 2 tse Lec Tec Mommencweme 2S ee a Se % ses aw am ce 1255 an aD 10 3.000 co | ROGUE OTST. Note: For complete desorpon of cassitcatn cra soo ASTM 0464799 Sec.0.1.1410.17, and Table 1. Tested By KEL Date 12/22/11 _ Checked By Date 12-28-11 44 Baldock Avenue + East Pitabuigh, PRIGHY2 + 412809-7600 + FAX 4126208099» ww geotechnisaneteotechnics PINHOLE DISPERSION TEST ‘ASTM D4647-06(SOP-$50) tent {GEO SOLUTION, INC. orng No, t2n6i1 Cent Retoronce P1147 KROME AVE Denn ty Proje: No 2011559.02 Sapo No Labo 2ort-8.c29 Vous GRAY STABILIZED MATERIAL “Taro No. o7 Wor Tare« Wet Spacian (om) 140.48 Tursiomy WotTare «Ory Specimen om) 12807 Yo. VERY DARK ‘eign Tare (om ‘087 -DAAK Wiig of Water gm 1499 IMD - MODERATELY DARK Wiolgh ot ry Specimen (gm) 110 '8D- SLIGHTLY DARK 8V- BARELY VISBLE Water Const) eos (C0 COMPLETELY CLEAR ‘ay Density (ned ory eee a Fal Hot Or (rr) 13 Cassteaton NDI NONDISPERSIVE Glock Head Flow Flow Rate Tubity Turbidity Remarks Tie Rate From Side FromTop (rot) (200) (rlnee) (Choose from the above lst) 1400 2 5 is ose _o0 oc _ sao a os ee oc 3405 zw ae Los ee. Cc RO GHANGE UNTO TOMNUTES wor z so. as Tossr 6. ec a 20 0 “oss cc. co WO GUNG WEREASEREAD ie » _S mo oe oe _ 1aa3 zo a ome co cc 145 7 «soem oo CC.“ NOGHANGE GREASE HEAD a ee aa ra ser it a8 Laas cc ao is 61280 (OC NOGHANGE INCREASE HEAD az 2D 7 ser = 46 20 S _as00 was Tar oe “20 ‘ROGANGE-ENOTEST Note: For complote descrpsion of clasiteation cra sop ASTM O4647-39 Se.101.141017, and Table Tenesy KGL Date 544 Braddock Avenue sass Cracks yA Date _19-26-\ East Pssurgh, PA 15112 * 812.800.7800 + FAX 412.020.6080 + worgocecnic et‘GE0-soLUTONS, we. 1147 KROMEAVE 2orn-59.02 aoriseaee2 09 WigTates Wet Szecinen Gm) 19620, WatTare + Oy Specimen md. 11860, 1960 Wot of Bry Speman fm) a2 Water Comsat 8) mma ry Dana oc ws Fa ele Dam (rnd 13 Ccaseteaton Not Clock Head Faw (200) 1595 1607 = 26 Ss 27 Ter a 1532 ao st ses ez ae Lt Tisz" = 3525 = 1528 1690 ‘eofechnics PINHOLE DISPERSION TEST ‘ASTM 4847-26 (SOP-S60) Boring No Det) ‘Sampse Ro Vial GE coun Tuner o- ven DARK - DARK MO - MODERATELY DARK. '5D- SUGHTLY DARK. BV-GARELY VISIBLE (CC COMPLETELY CLEAR wens a NONDISPERSIVE Tenby Turbaty Remar (lace) (Chooee tom he above at) 0.40 86 oc TOCHANGE- RON TO TOUTES NOCaNGE NEREGEEOD NOUNGE WOREASE EAD NO GANG “CREASE HEAD | sl Fe 5 | Not: Fr complete dostoton of clasoaton tla se ASTM DAGA7.G9 .10.3.1410.17, nd Tb Kot___ bate set Gracock Avene» East Pesto s2e2nt chested PA IBN + 412400-760 » FAX AI2A28009 + wan getaemnen.ntcat {GEO-SOLUTIONS, NC, Cert Relrance S147 KROME AVE, Promcine, port sence Gio soy aoe Tare no we Wat Ter Wet Specimen gm) 10808, WiatTare ry Speman gn) 20.26 Weihtat Ta (or e423 Wait of Water nd 1388 Weight of Ory Specimen (gn) 503 Water Content) 80 12 not (eee PINHOLE DISPERSION TEST ‘ASTI D4847-08 (SOP-S60) ‘eotechnics Borg No, vanes Denso Vis! STABILIZED MATERIAL ‘unsiory o- VERY DARK DARK 1MO- MODERATELY DARK '50- SUGHTLY DARK 1V- BARELY VISIBLE (6C- COMPLETELY CLEAR Mattos a NONDISPERSIVE Flow Rate Turbety —Turbty Remarks Rate From Side FromTop {imlsee) (Choose trom the above lit) oz oe. co os ee. 06. 0259 e0, co NOGWNGE-AINTOT NUTS 28s oc) ‘oc Teas Tec Tec wo ainge nena nD He Te as cc cc ‘oss cc cc GE NRREHOD. Tow ee oe 1000 ee. ce 100 oe. OC _-NOGHANGE NOREASE HEAD S44 Braonk Avenue + East Pesugh PASI» 4128237800 + FAX 124239389 + vamngaatctris ne