Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Achieving Success in
Nonprofit Organizations
Authorised for educator review use only by Silvia Fotea, Emanuel University of Oradea. Expiry date 15-Oct-2021
Usage permitted only within these parameters otherwise contact info@thecasecentre.org
Timothy J. Kloppenborg and
Laurence J. Laning, Editors
Educational material supplied by The Case Centre
Copyright encoded A76HM-JUJ9K-PJMN9I
Authorised for educator review use only by Silvia Fotea, Emanuel University of Oradea. Expiry date 15-Oct-2021
prior permission of the publisher.
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Authorised for educator review use only by Silvia Fotea, Emanuel University of Oradea. Expiry date 15-Oct-2021
Bet, Kate, Nick, and Andy
and
Abstract
This book is aimed at leaders of nonprofit organizations. These leaders
include executive directors, managers, board members, pastors, key vol-
unteers, and anyone who wishes to make a difference. The four overarch-
Authorised for educator review use only by Silvia Fotea, Emanuel University of Oradea. Expiry date 15-Oct-2021
ing areas of living the mission, making good decisions, getting things
done, and developing your team emerged from literature searches, focus
groups, and surveys to discover objectively what critical skills and knowl-
Keywords
nonprofit management, leadership, strategy, execution, portfolio manage-
ment, project management, information technology, data-based decision
making, executive leadership, executive sponsorship, organization assessment
BEP1997
Contents
List of Figures ........................................................................................ix
Authorised for educator review use only by Silvia Fotea, Emanuel University of Oradea. Expiry date 15-Oct-2021
List of Tables..........................................................................................xi
Preface ................................................................................................xiii
viii CONTENTS
Authorised for educator review use only by Silvia Fotea, Emanuel University of Oradea. Expiry date 15-Oct-2021
Case Study: Buckhorn Children and Family Services
Timothy J. Kloppenborg
Case Study: Redwood Rehabilitation
List of Figures
1.1 A virtuous cycle in non-profit organization success ....................2
Authorised for educator review use only by Silvia Fotea, Emanuel University of Oradea. Expiry date 15-Oct-2021
2.1 How mission and strategy work together .................................17
2.2 Mind map based on stakeholder interviews,
Friars Club strategy workshop ..................................................18
x LIST OF FIGURES
8.1
Simplified value/risk project portfolio evaluation model.........128
8.2
Risk analysis grid of probability and consequence ..................132
8.3
Jack Pealer chart—who is in the life of a person
with disabilities? .....................................................................135
9.1 Information technologies—four major technologies ..............146
9.2 Estimated number of patients receiving care in
Authorised for educator review use only by Silvia Fotea, Emanuel University of Oradea. Expiry date 15-Oct-2021
public reporting practices .......................................................160
9.3 Number of providers publicly reporting diabetes data ............160
10.1 The cash conversion cycle.......................................................172
List of Tables
2.1 Strategic thinking and management framework .......................14
Authorised for educator review use only by Silvia Fotea, Emanuel University of Oradea. Expiry date 15-Oct-2021
2.2 Brand/mission gap analysis template ........................................25
2.3 Sample completed brand/mission gap analysis template ...........26
4.1 Ten Talbert House values .........................................................57
Preface
We met over 20 years ago. Laurie was midcareer at Procter & Gamble
Authorised for educator review use only by Silvia Fotea, Emanuel University of Oradea. Expiry date 15-Oct-2021
(P&G), having other work experience and his PhD before joining P&G.
Tim was untenured at Xavier University having a few years of business
experience. Laurie held roles of increasing responsibility at P&G includ-
pleted his U.S. Air Force Reserve career with assignments in transporta-
Copyright encoded A76HM-JUJ9K-PJMN9I
APPENDIX
Authorised for educator review use only by Silvia Fotea, Emanuel University of Oradea. Expiry date 15-Oct-2021
This appendix briefly explains the research processes we used to identify
the topics and sections for this book. The two co-editors first performed
Financial
management
7 in, 2 out
Leadership
Stakeholders principles
7 in, 8 out 3 in, 8 out
Strategic
thinking
Authorised for educator review use only by Silvia Fotea, Emanuel University of Oradea. Expiry date 15-Oct-2021
4 in, 4 out
Impact
9 in, 4 out
Programs and
Educational material supplied by The Case Centre
services Ethics
Copyright encoded A76HM-JUJ9K-PJMN9I
Values
3 in, 7 out
We also had our focus group members multivote for the individual
items that constituted each group.3 This was used to limit the number
of questions we would later ask in our surveys. Each member was given
a limited number of votes and asked to vote for the items that he or she
personally thought might be most helpful for leaders of nonprofit, faith-
based organizations, or both. For the sake of simplicity, we only show
the items that received multiple votes, in Table A.1. They are listed by
number of votes each received (out of 10 possible votes).
Armed with the focus group results, the third step in our research
was to create a pilot survey. After receiving responses, we tightened up
the language on a number of our questions and constructed a large-scale
survey. Nearly 200 leaders of various nonprofit and faith-based organi-
zations across the United States responded by rating the value of each
suggested item on a scale of 1 to 5 with 5 being the most important.
We performed factor analysis on the survey responses, and are using the
results from the survey as justification for our book. Many of the items in
BEP1997
Authorised for educator review use only by Silvia Fotea, Emanuel University of Oradea. Expiry date 15-Oct-2021
7—Document outcomes
7—Pragmatic, well-understood vision for both short- and long-term
5—Board development: includes succession, continuity, and governance
the survey did not cluster into reliable factors and so we did not use them.
There are four reliable factors and these form the four major sections of
our book and are described in detail in those sections.
Notes
Authorised for educator review use only by Silvia Fotea, Emanuel University of Oradea. Expiry date 15-Oct-2021
1. Center for Quality of Management (1997).
2. Brassard and Ritter (2008).
References
Brassard, M., & Ritter, D. (2008). The memory Jogger II healthcare edition: A
pocket guide for continuous improvement and effective planning. Salem, NH:
Educational material supplied by The Case Centre
Copyright encoded A76HM-JUJ9K-PJMN9I
GOAL/QPC.
Center for Quality of Management. (1997). The method for priority marking.
Cambridge, MA: Center for Quality of Management.
Carver, J. (2006). Boards that make a difference: A new design for leadership in
nonprofit and public organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Collins, J. (2005). Good to great and the social sciences. Boulder, CO: Jim Collins.
Crutchfield, L. R., & McLeod Grant, H. (2012). Forces for good: The six principles
of high-impact nonprofits. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Denhardt, R. B., Denhardt, J. V., & Aristiguenta, M. P. (2013). Managing human
behavior in public and nonprofit organizations (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA:
Sage.
Drucker, P. F. (2006). Managing the nonprofit organization principles and practices.
New York, NY: Harper Collins Publishers.
Gordon, G., & Crabtree, S. (2006). Building engaged schools: Getting the most out
of America’s classrooms. New York, NY: Gallup Press.
http://www.cultureofaccountability.ca/index.html
http://www.jeanroberts.com.au/non-profit/critical-success-factor-checklist/
Kloppenborg, T. J., Tesch, D., & King, B. (2012). 21st century project success
measures: Evolution, interpretation, and direction. Proceedings, Project
Management Institute Research and Education Conference. Limerick, Ireland.
Lowney, C. (2006). Heroic leadership: Best practices from a 450 year old company
that changed the world. Chicago, IL: Loyola Press.
Morino, M. (2011). Leap of reason: Managing to outcomes in an era of scarcity.
Washington, DC: Venture Philanthropy Partners.
BEP1997
Authorised for educator review use only by Silvia Fotea, Emanuel University of Oradea. Expiry date 15-Oct-2021
and start being the church again. New York, NY: Gallup Press.
Worth, M. J. (2012). Nonprofit management: Principles and practices. Los Angeles,
CA: Sage.
Index
accrual- based accounting statements, Love Your Neighbor Center, case
171 example, 40–44
Authorised for educator review use only by Silvia Fotea, Emanuel University of Oradea. Expiry date 15-Oct-2021
advanced visualization, 149 roles and responsibilities of (see
adverse consequence absorption, 131 responsibilities, of boards)
affinity diagrams, 112–114 Borders Books, 11
318 INDEX
Authorised for educator review use only by Silvia Fotea, Emanuel University of Oradea. Expiry date 15-Oct-2021
191–192 pivotal role of, 76
control systems for, 188–191 confidence interval, 105
external environmental changes, Congregation Leadership Team
INDEX 319
Authorised for educator review use only by Silvia Fotea, Emanuel University of Oradea. Expiry date 15-Oct-2021
Danone, 90 280–282
dashboard, 149 StrengthsFinder 2.0 role, 283
data-based decisions, 97–98 employee motivation
108–110
decision tree, 108–109 psychological ownership in, 299,
expected value, calculating, 301
109–110 role in board election, 297
expected value for each decision worker/owners, participative
alternative, 109 decision making, 297
decision tree, 108–109 employees
deferral risk, 131–134 development and teamwork, 266
Define, measure, analyze, improve, empowerment of, 265
and control (DMAIC) model, employees first approach, in
268–270 organizations, 67–68
Deloitte & Touche, 152 Employees First, Customers Second
DESIGN stage, 86 (2010), 67
DISCOVER stage, 86–87 Ethics Resource Center (ERC), 49
discretionary effort, 130 executing stage, in project life cycle,
distributed-leadership organizations 220–224
three-part job structure in, 66–67 external customers, 262
dominant quality management external environment, 186–187, 188,
methods, 260–261 190–191
door-to-door selling, 90
Drohan, Mary Jo, 160–161 Facebook, 150
Drucker, Peter, 36–37, 43, 44 facilities infrastructure project, 126
dual goal strategy, defined, 4 faith- based organizations, 58,
167. See also nonprofit
effective innovation process, 87–88 organizations
Eigel Center for Community- family life balance, 131
Engaged Learning, 194 features, of book
The Elements of Great Managing, 289 for nonprofit leaders and
Embrace, 91–92 practitioners, 4–5
employee engagement, 265, 279 Federal reporting Form 990, 34
BEP1997
320 INDEX
Authorised for educator review use only by Silvia Fotea, Emanuel University of Oradea. Expiry date 15-Oct-2021
income statement, 169 works for better health care, at
fixed assets, 175 lower costs, 144
Flickr, 150 YourHealthMatters website, 159
INDEX 321
Authorised for educator review use only by Silvia Fotea, Emanuel University of Oradea. Expiry date 15-Oct-2021
innovation first program partners
best practices for, 85 involvement, 74
choices, 88 network partners role, 75–76
322 INDEX
Authorised for educator review use only by Silvia Fotea, Emanuel University of Oradea. Expiry date 15-Oct-2021
responsibility for COA’s regional Statistics, 3
HCAT, 208–210 National Council of Nonprofits, 43
lessons learned, 210 Nayar, Vineet, 67
INDEX 323
Authorised for educator review use only by Silvia Fotea, Emanuel University of Oradea. Expiry date 15-Oct-2021
management shift to risks assessment, 54–55
engagement and strength strong ethics creation and
approach, key resources, maintenance, benefits of,
324 INDEX
Authorised for educator review use only by Silvia Fotea, Emanuel University of Oradea. Expiry date 15-Oct-2021
at Starfire Council (see Starfire QUALIFY stage, 86–87
Council) qualitative data analyses, 110–115
sustained organizational affinity diagrams, 112–114
INDEX 325
Authorised for educator review use only by Silvia Fotea, Emanuel University of Oradea. Expiry date 15-Oct-2021
assessing performance, annual vendors
reviews, 33–34 application, 145
chief executive, selection and cloud computing, 154–155
326 INDEX
Authorised for educator review use only by Silvia Fotea, Emanuel University of Oradea. Expiry date 15-Oct-2021
Strengths-based leadership, 281, 289 Tapscott, Don, 151
strengths-based leadership, and target customer, 85
engagement, 281. See also Tata Teleservices Limited, 93
INDEX 327
Authorised for educator review use only by Silvia Fotea, Emanuel University of Oradea. Expiry date 15-Oct-2021
organizations 99–100
board’s The World is Flat, 144
characteristics, and attributes World Trade Center attacks, 189,