Professional Documents
Culture Documents
5: Developing a Behavioral Treatment Protocol in Conjunction with MAT
Developing a Behavioral
Treatment Protocol in conjunction
with MAT
[
Kenneth M. Carpenter, Ph.D.
Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY
Center for Motivation and Change, New York, NY
Kenneth M. Carpenter, PhD
Nicole Kosanke, PhD 1
Module 5: Developing a Behavioral Treatment Protocol in Conjunction with MAT
Educational Objectives
Target Audience
Kenneth M. Carpenter, PhD
Nicole Kosanke, PhD 2
Module 5: Developing a Behavioral Treatment Protocol in Conjunction with MAT
Why Evidenced-Based
Approaches?
• Psychosocial and medication-based interventions can
facilitate changes in substance use (NIDA, 2012).
Kenneth M. Carpenter, PhD
Nicole Kosanke, PhD 3
Module 5: Developing a Behavioral Treatment Protocol in Conjunction with MAT
10
11
12
Kenneth M. Carpenter, PhD
Nicole Kosanke, PhD 4
Module 5: Developing a Behavioral Treatment Protocol in Conjunction with MAT
Relapse:
Cognitive Behavioral Formulation
(Witkiewitz and Marlatt, 2004)
13
Recognize
Avoid
Cope
Evaluate
14
Recognition Skills
• Goal: To help individuals identify the environmental and
subjective contexts in which substance use is likely to
occur (i.e. Triggers or Cues)
• Strategies:
15
Kenneth M. Carpenter, PhD
Nicole Kosanke, PhD 5
Module 5: Developing a Behavioral Treatment Protocol in Conjunction with MAT
Urge/Craving Diary
17
Functional Analysis
Kenneth M. Carpenter, PhD
Nicole Kosanke, PhD 6
Module 5: Developing a Behavioral Treatment Protocol in Conjunction with MAT
Functional Analysis
19
Avoidance Skills
Strategies
• alter travel routes in neighborhood
• avoid or change members of social network
• remove drug paraphernalia from the home
20
Coping Skills
21
Kenneth M. Carpenter, PhD
Nicole Kosanke, PhD 7
Module 5: Developing a Behavioral Treatment Protocol in Conjunction with MAT
22
Thought Diary
(an out of session exercise)
I could use a pick-me-up; I would I have been social in the past without cocaine;I
be more social and have fun. practiced starting conversations with my
therapist and will try out those skills.
23
Evaluation Skills
Strategies:
• Tracking and monitoring behaviors during the week
• Assessing substance use during each treatment visit
• Employing urine monitoring systems as part of the
treatment protocol
24
Kenneth M. Carpenter, PhD
Nicole Kosanke, PhD 8
Module 5: Developing a Behavioral Treatment Protocol in Conjunction with MAT
Practice Helps
25
26
2. Develop Competing
Reinforcement
• The value of drug or alcohol use is dependent, in
part, on the availability of other reinforcers for
non-drug use behavior
• Experimental studies demonstrate drugs and
alcohol are less likely to be self administered when
there is a choice between substance use and
alternative or competing reinforcers (e.g. food,
money, entertainment) (Higgins, 1997).
• A treatment protocol can target the social and
environmental context in which drug use occurs in
order to decrease its value and increase
therapeutically desirable behaviors
27
Kenneth M. Carpenter, PhD
Nicole Kosanke, PhD 9
Module 5: Developing a Behavioral Treatment Protocol in Conjunction with MAT
Contingency Management
28
Four Categories of
Systematic Responding
(Higgins; Silverman, 1999).
To Increase Behavior:
•Positive Reinforcement: delivering a desired consequence
contingent on meeting a therapeutic goal
•Negative Reinforcement: removing an aversive event or a
restricting context contingent on meeting a therapeutic
goal
To Decrease Behavior:
•Positive Punishment: delivering an aversive consequence
(i.e. verbal reprimand) contingent on undesirable behavior
•Negative Punishment: removing something positive (e.g.
attention, access to video games) contingent on
undesirable behavior.
29
Evidence
30
Kenneth M. Carpenter, PhD
Nicole Kosanke, PhD 10
Module 5: Developing a Behavioral Treatment Protocol in Conjunction with MAT
Office-Based Programs
31
CLINICAL SPOTLIGHT
Community Reinforcement & Family Training
32
CLINICAL SPOTLIGHT
Community Reinforcement & Family Training
• Utilizes a menu-driven, CBT, skills-based approach
• Evidence-based approach with success rates for getting
substance user into treatment at 60-70% (vs. rates of
treatment entry at 30% for more widely known “Intervention”
approach and 12% forAl-Anon)
• Once substance user is engaged in treatment, families trained
in reinforcement paradigms and participating in a positive,
active manner they can better support the treatment
contingency management efforts, provide supervision of
medications (as needed, e.g. disulfiram), support continued
treatment engagement and help promote and sustain
abstinent lifestyle and environment
33
Kenneth M. Carpenter, PhD
Nicole Kosanke, PhD 11
Module 5: Developing a Behavioral Treatment Protocol in Conjunction with MAT
CLINICAL SPOTLIGHT
Community Reinforcement & Family Training
34
35
Kenneth M. Carpenter, PhD
Nicole Kosanke, PhD 12
Module 5: Developing a Behavioral Treatment Protocol in Conjunction with MAT
37
7. Self-Care
• Use self-assessment tools to gauge CSO mental
health status over time
• Set goals that prioritize self-care (for own sake and as
role model of healthy behavior to others in the family)
38
39
Kenneth M. Carpenter, PhD
Nicole Kosanke, PhD 13
Module 5: Developing a Behavioral Treatment Protocol in Conjunction with MAT
40
CLINICAL SPOTLIGHT
Motivational Interviewing
(Miller and Rollnick, 2013)
41
Conversational Goals
42
Kenneth M. Carpenter, PhD
Nicole Kosanke, PhD 14
Module 5: Developing a Behavioral Treatment Protocol in Conjunction with MAT
MI Conversational Tools
43
Open Questions:
Examples:
If you were to quit, how would you do it?
How could this medication be helpful to you in meeting
your goals?
What would be different about your day if you did change
your diet?
44
Affirmations
45
Kenneth M. Carpenter, PhD
Nicole Kosanke, PhD 15
Module 5: Developing a Behavioral Treatment Protocol in Conjunction with MAT
Examples of Affirmations
• A statement of appreciation
I appreciate your openness and honesty today
• A compliment
I like the way you said that
46
Reflective Listening
Simple Reflections
• A simple statement reiterating what the provider is hearing from the
client
• A simple reflection conveys the provider’s effort to collaboratively
understand the client’s experience and builds a mutual
understanding between client and provider
Complex Reflections
• Convey a deeper or more complex picture of what the client has
said
• May be used to emphasize a particular part of what the client has
said to make a point or take the conversation in a different direction
47
Example of Reflective Listening
Managing Blood Sugar
48
Kenneth M. Carpenter, PhD
Nicole Kosanke, PhD 16
Module 5: Developing a Behavioral Treatment Protocol in Conjunction with MAT
Examples of Reflections
49
Summary Statements
50
51
Kenneth M. Carpenter, PhD
Nicole Kosanke, PhD 17
Module 5: Developing a Behavioral Treatment Protocol in Conjunction with MAT
• Querying Extremes
1.What concerns do you have about your heroin use in the long run
?
2.If nothing were to change, what do you imagine could be the worst
outcome?
3.If things were to change the way you want them to, what would life
look like?
52
Identify patients’ bigger goals and values (what they want their life to
stand for (e.g. being a good parent).
53
54
Kenneth M. Carpenter, PhD
Nicole Kosanke, PhD 18
Module 5: Developing a Behavioral Treatment Protocol in Conjunction with MAT
55
Family Interventions
56
Family-focused Treatments
57
Kenneth M. Carpenter, PhD
Nicole Kosanke, PhD 19
Module 5: Developing a Behavioral Treatment Protocol in Conjunction with MAT
Self-Help Groups
58
Conclusion
59
References
•Aharonovich E, Hasin DS, Brooks AC, et al: Cognitive deficits predict low
treatment retention in cocaine dependent patients. Drug Alcohol Depend 81:
313- 322, 2006
•Apodaca TR, Longabaugh R. 2009. Mechanisms of change in motivational
interviewing: A review and preliminary evaluation of the evidence. Addiction
104: 705-715.
•Carroll KM. 1998. A Cognitive-Behavioral Approach: Treating Cocaine
Addiction. Therapy Manuals for Drug Addiction Manual 1 (NIH Publ No 98-
4308). Rockville, MD, National Institute on Drug Abuse.
•Carroll KM, Ball SA, Nich C, et al. 2001. Targeting behavioral therapies to
enhance naltrexone treatment of opioid dependence: efficacy of contingency
management and significant other involvement. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 58,755-
761.
60
Kenneth M. Carpenter, PhD
Nicole Kosanke, PhD 20
Module 5: Developing a Behavioral Treatment Protocol in Conjunction with MAT
References
•Epstein EE, McCrady BS: 1998. Behavioral couples treatment of alcohol and
drug use disorders: current status and innovations. Clin Psychol Rev 18, 689-
711.
61
References
•Galanter M. 1999. Network Therapy for Alcohol and Drug abuse, 2nd Edition.
Boston, MA, Allyn & Bacon, 1989.
•Hasin DS, Stinson FS, Ogburn E, et al: 2007. Prevalence, Correlates,
Disability, and Comorbidity of DSM-IV Alcohol Abuse and Dependence in the
United States: Results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and
Related Conditions. Arch Gen Psychiatry 64: 830-842.
•Hettema J, Steele J, Miller WR: Motivational Interviewing. 2005. Ann Rev
Clin Psychol 1:91-111.
•Higgins ST. 1997. The influence of alternative reinforcers on cocaine use and
abuse. A brief review. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 57: 419-427.
•Higgins ST, Silverman K.1999. Motivating Behavior Change Among Illicit-
Drug Abusers: Research on Contingency Management Interventions.
Washington DC; American Psychological Association.
62
References
•Moos RH, Moos BS. 2004. The interplay between help-seeking and alcohol-
related outcomes: divergent processes for professional treatment and self-
help groups. Drug Alcohol Depend 75: 155-164.
•McLellan AT, Lewis DC, O’Brien CP, Kleber HD. 2000. Drug
Dependence, a chronic medical illness: Implications for treatment,
insurance, and outcomes evaluation. JAMA. 284: 1689-1695.
63
Kenneth M. Carpenter, PhD
Nicole Kosanke, PhD 21
Module 5: Developing a Behavioral Treatment Protocol in Conjunction with MAT
References
64
PCSS Listserv
65
Kenneth M. Carpenter, PhD
Nicole Kosanke, PhD 22
Module 5: Developing a Behavioral Treatment Protocol in Conjunction with MAT
PCSS-MAT is a collaborative effort led by the American Academy of Addiction Psychiatry (AAAP) in partnership
with the: Addiction Technology Transfer Center (ATTC); American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP);
American Academy of Pain Medicine (AAPM); American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP); American College of
Emergency Physicians (ACEP); American College of Physicians (ACP); American Dental Association (ADA);
American Medical Association (AMA); American Osteopathic Academy of Addiction Medicine (AOAAM); American
Psychiatric Association (APA); American Psychiatric Nurses Association (APNA); American Society of Addiction
Medicine (ASAM); American Society for Pain Management Nursing (ASPMN); Association for Medical Education
and Research in Substance Abuse (AMERSA); International Nurses Society on Addictions (IntNSA);
National Association of Community Health Centers (NACHC); and the National Association of Drug Court
Professionals (NADCP).
Funding for this initiative was made possible (in part) by Providers’ Clinical Support System for Medication Assisted Treatment
(1U79TI026556) from SAMHSA. The views expressed in written conference materials or publications and by speakers and
moderators do not necessarily reflect the official policies of the Department of Health and Human Services; nor does mention of trade
names, commercial practices, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. 67
Kenneth M. Carpenter, PhD
Nicole Kosanke, PhD 23