Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CH 19 SM
CH 19 SM
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
Q19-1. When standard costs are not incorporated, Q19-6. (a) Deferral of variances is supported on the
they may be used for the purposes of pricing, grounds that, if the standards in use are
budgeting, and controlling cost; but if they are based on normal price, efficiency, and
not used for inventory costing, the advan- output levels, positive and negative vari-
tages from the saving of clerical effort in ances can be expected to offset one
accounting cannot be obtained. another in the long run. Because variance
Q19-2. With actual cost methods, it is first necessary account balances at any given point in
to select a cost flow method—lifo, fifo, aver- time are due to recurring seasonal and
age, etc. It is then necessary to keep detailed business cycle fluctuations, and because
records of quantities and prices and to make periodic reporting requirements result in
fairly complex calculations of inventory costs. arbitrary cutoff dates, variance account
With a standard costing system, only quanti- balances at a particular cutoff date are
ties, not prices, must be taken into account, not assignable to operating results of the
facilitating both record keeping and calcula- period then ended. They will cancel out
tions. Standard costs also provide cost control. over time and therefore should be carried
Q19-3. The number of variance accounts is deter- to the balance sheet.
mined by (a) the number and type of vari- (b) Variances appearing as charges or cred-
ances that are to appear in statements for its on the income statement are regarded
management use, and (b) the need for easy as appropriate charges or credits in the
disposal of variances at the end of the fiscal period in which they arise. They are con-
period, particularly when the variances are sidered the result of favorable or unfavor-
not treated uniformly in financial statements able departures from normal (standard)
and for analyses. conditions and are disclosed separately
Q19-4. (a) The standard cost of products completed from cost of goods sold at standard. This
and products sold can be determined provides management with unobscured
immediately without waiting for the actual information for immediate corrective
cost to be calculated. With standard action.
costs, monthly statements can be pre- Inventory costs and cost of goods
pared more quickly. sold should not be distorted by variances
(b) A firm producing a great many different that represent abnormal efficiencies or
products finds it practically impossible to inefficiencies. The standard cost repre-
determine the actual cost of each prod- sents that amount which is reasonably
uct. The use of standard costs will facili- necessary to produce finished products
tate the preparation of income statements and should therefore be considered the
by product lines. best measure of the cost of goods manu-
(c) Keeping finished goods stock records in factured and inventory cost, as long as
quantities only will result in clerical sav- the underlying operating conditions
ing, since this eliminates the necessity for remain unchanged.
recording the actual unit cost of each (c) The argument for allocating variances
receipt and issue or shipment. between inventories and cost of goods
Q19-5. The standard costing of inventories depends sold is that standard costs are a useful
on (a) the types of standards employed, (b) tool for purposes of managerial control,
the degree of success that the company has but should not be substitutes for actual
in keeping overall actual costs in line with historical costs in the financial state-
standard costs, and (c) the concept held with ments. Only actual historical costs should
regard to the most suitable kind of cost. be used for financial reporting, even
19-1
19-2 Chapter 19
though they are greater or less than which they arise distorts both the inven-
standard costs, and without regard to the tory and gross profit figures. This distor-
reasons for their differences from stan- tion will be even greater if the standards
dard costs. Standard cost variances are are lacking in accuracy or reliability.
not gains or losses but costs (or reduc- Further, to substitute standard costs for
tions therein) of goods manufactured actual historical costs in the financial
and should be allocated between inven- statements represents an unwarranted
tories and cost of goods sold. To treat sacrifice of objectivity.
them as gains or losses in the period in
Chapter 19 19-3
EXERCISES
E19-1
Price variance recorded at the time materials are received and placed in the storeroom:
Materials recorded at actual cost when received, and price variance determined at the
time materials are issued to production:
Price variance determined when the materials are received, but not charged to produc-
tion until the materials are actually placed in process:
E19-2
E19-2 (Concluded)
(2) Unit
Average costing Total Cost Quantity Cost
Beginning inventory..................... $ 15,880 2,000 $7.94
Purchases ................................... 96,960 12,000 8.08
Available for use........................... 112,840 14,000 8.06 average
E19-3
Payroll.............................................................................. 18,144
Accrued Payroll ........................................................ 18,144
E19-4
Work in Process
(10,000 units × 2 SQ per unit × $2 SP) ............. 40,000
Materials Price Variance
(($2.02 AP – $2 SP) × 21,000 AQ)...................... 420
Materials Quantity Variance
($2 SP × (20,000 SQ – 21,000 AQ)).................... 2,000
Materials (21,000 AQ × $2.02 AP) ........................... 42,420
Work in Process
(10,000 units × 1/4 SH per unit × $12 SR) ........ 30,000
Labor Rate Variance
(($12.20 AR – $12 SR) × 2,425 AH) ................... 485
Labor Efficiency Variance
($12 SR × (2,425 AH – 2,500 SH))...................... 900
Payroll (2,425 AH × $12.20 AR) ............................... 29,585
E19-5
E19-6
E19-7
E19-8
E19-9
Percentage of current-year labor cost element in finished goods and cost of goods
sold:
Amount %
Finished goods, 19,000 units × $4 labor ...................... $ 76,000 20
Cost of goods sold (from current production),
(91,000 units – 15,000 units) × $4 labor ................. 304,000 80
$380,000 100
End-of-year balances:
Finished Cost of
Goods Goods Sold
Balance at standard .................................................................. $171,000 $819,000
Current year’s labor variances allocation............................... 10,400 41,600
Last year’s variances, all applicable to cost of goods
sold on a fifo flow assumption .......................................... 5,800
$181,400 866,400
E19-10
Percentage of units in inventories and cost of goods sold:
Direct Labor and
Materials Factory Overhead
Account Units % Units %
Work in Process ........................................... 1,500 25% 500 10%
Finished Goods ............................................ 1,200 20% 1,200 24%
Cost of Goods Sold...................................... 3,300 55% 3,300 66%
Total ............................................................... 6,000 100% 5,000 100%
Allocation of variances:
Cost of
Total Work in Finished Goods
Variance Amount Process Goods Sold
Materials purchase price ........... $ (150.00) $ (37.50) $ (30.00) $ (82.50)
Materials quantity....................... 500.00 125.00 100.00 275.00
Labor rate.................................... 600.00 60.00 144.00 396.00
Labor efficiency.......................... 1,200.00 120.00 288.00 792.00
Controllable................................. 1,500.00 150.00 360.00 990.00
Volume ....................................... (1,800.00) (180.00) (432.00) (1,188.00)
Total ............................................. $ 1,850.00 $ 237.50 $ 430.00 $ 1,182.50
19-8 Chapter 19
E19-11 APPENDIX
Work in Process ($4 FO rate × 3,450 units × 1.5 SH per unit) 20,700
Applied Factory Overhead ................................................. 20,700
E19-12 APPENDIX
PROBLEMS
P19-1
Work in Process
(5,500 equivalent units × 3/4 SH × $16 FO rate)......... 66,000
Applied Factory Overhead ................................................. 66,000
Cost of Goods Sold (5,500 units × $26 standard cost) ......... 143,000
Finished Goods ................................................................... 143,000
19-10 Chapter 19
P19-2
P19-3
Conversion
Materials Cost
Units completed and transferred out this period........ 5,000 5,000
Less all units in beginning inventory........................... 3,000 3,000
Equivalent units started and completed this period .. 2,000 2,000
Add equivalent units required to complete
beginning inventory........................................... 0 2,000
Add equivalent units in ending inventory.................... 2,000 1,500
Equivalent units of production this period.................. 4,000 5,500
Multiply by standard quantity of input per unit
of product .......................................................... 6 units 1/2 hour
Standard quantity of input allowed for work
produced during the period.............................. 24,000 2,750
P19-3 (Concluded)
P19-4
LEESVILLE CORPORATION
Income Statement
For Year Ended December 31, 20A
Sales ((20,000 units + 110,000 units – 12,000 units) × $25)........................ $2,950,000
Cost of goods sold at standard (118,000 units × 17.60) ............................. 2,076,800
Gross profit at standard................................................................................. $ 873,200
Add net manufacturing variance................................................................... 901
Gross profit, adjusted to actual..................................................................... $ 873,290
Less marketing and administrative expenses ............................................. 680,500
Operating income ........................................................................................... $ 192,790
Factory overhead:
Controllable .................................................................. 8,000
Volume .......................................................................... 1,100
$48,760 $48,850
48,760
Net favorable variance....................................................... $ 90 fav.
Chapter 19 19-13
P19-4 (Continued)
Materials:
Actual quantity × average cost
(250,000 lbs. × 1.485 per lb.).................................... $371,250
Actual quantity × standard cost
(250,000 lbs. × $1.50 per lb.).................................... 375,000
Materials purchase price variance................................ $ (3,750) fav.
Labor:
Actual labor cost ............................................................ $1,313,760
Actual hours × standard labor rate (161,000 hours × $8) 1,288,000
Labor rate variance ........................................................ $25,760 unfav.
P19-4 (Concluded)
**Computation of equivalent production for labor and factory overhead:
Hour Unit
Basis Basis
Transferred out of work in process .............................. 165,000 110,000
Beginning inventory—work in process........................ 15,000 10,000
Started and completed this period............................... 150,000 100,000
Add 3/5 to complete beginning inventory.................... 9,000 6,000
Add 1/3 of ending inventory.......................................... 7,500 5,000
Total ........................................................................... 166,500 111,000
P19-5
KALMAN COMPANY
Interim Income Statement
For the Second Quarter, 20—
Sales (600,000 × $30) ............................................................... $18,000,000
Cost of goods sold at standard (500,000 × $18) ................... 10,800,000
Gross profit at standard .......................................................... $ 7,200,000
Adjustments for standard cost variances:
Materials price variance1 ........................... $237,600
Labor efficiency variance2 ........................ 36,000
3
Overhead spending variance .................. 135,000
Variable overhead efficiency variance4.... 8,000
5
Overhead volume variance ...................... 0 416,600
Adjusted gross profit ............................................................... $ 6,783,400
Less commercial expenses:
Marketing expenses ($18,000,000 × 10%) .. $1,800,000
Administrative expenses ($6,000,000 × 25%) 1,500,000 3,300,000
Income before income tax....................................................... $ 3,483,400
Less income tax expense ($3,483,400 ×
($3,750,000 / $7,500,000))................................................... 1,741,700
Net income ................................................................................ $1,741.700
Chapter 19 19-15
P19-5 (Continued)
1Thematerials price variance should be prorated between work in process, finished
goods, and cost of goods sold as follows:
Ending balance of $72, 000
= = 4, 000 units
work in process $18 per unit
P19-5 (Concluded)
The overhead spending variance charged against second quarter income is calcu-
lated as follows:
P19-6
P19-6 (Concluded)
(2)
P19-7
P19-7 (Continued)
P19-7 (Concluded)
Schedule 1
GRINDLE CORPORATION
Schedule of Variances
For November
Unfav. Fav.
Materials purchase price variance .......................................... $ 800
Materials quantity variance ...................................................... $ 4,000
Labor rate variance ................................................................... 2,016
Labor efficiency variance ......................................................... 1,400
Factory overhead spending variance...................................... 2,000
Factory overhead variable efficiency variance ...................... 1,200
Factory overhead volume variance ......................................... 4,500
$12,516 $3,400
(3,400)
Net unfavorable variance.......................................................... $ 9,116
CGA-Canada (adapted). Reprint with permission.
P19-8
Allocated to Cost
Allocated of Goods Manufactured
to Cost of
Work in Finished Goods
Total Process Total Goods Sold
Materials price usage variance ........ $1,500 $500 $1,000 $375 $625
Materials quantity variance .............. 660 220 440 165 275
Direct labor rate variance ................. 250 50 200 75 125
Factory overhead spending variance (300) (60) (240) (90) (150)
Total variances .................................. $2,110 $710 $1,400 $525 $875
Discounts lost on purchases ........... 120 40 80 30 50
Total .............................................. $2,230 $750 $1,480 $555 $925
Factory
Materials Direct Labor Overhead
Pro- Pro- Pro-
duction duction duction
Units % Units % Units %
Work in Process:
Materials (1,200 units × 100%)................. 1,200 331/3
Direct labor (1,200 units × 50%) .............. 600 20
Factory overhead (1,200 units × 50%) .... 600 20
Finished goods (900 units × 100%)............... 900 25 900 30 900 30
Cost of goods sold (1,500 units × 100%)...... 1,500 412/3 1,500 50 1,500 50
Total............................................................ 3,600 100 3,000 100 3,000 100
Chapter 19 19-21
P19-8 (Concluded)
(2) Factory
Direct Over-
Materials Labor head Total
Work in process at standard cost:
Materials (1,200 units × $7 × 100%)..... $ 8,400
Direct labor (1,200 units × $8 × 50%) .. $ 4,800
Factory overhead (1,200 units ×
$2 × 50%) ........................................ $1,200 $14,400
Finished goods at standard cost:
Materials (900 units × $7) ..................... 6,300
Direct labor (900 units × $8)................. 7,200
Factory overhead (900 units × $2)....... 1,800 15,300
Cost of goods sold at standard cost:
Materials (1,500 units × $7) .................. 10,500
Direct labor (1,500 units × $8).............. 12,000
Factory overhead (1,500 units × $2).... 3,000 25,500
Total mfg. cost at standard cost... $25,200 $24,000 $6,000 $55,200
Less work in process, Dec. 31, 20— ... 8,400 4,800 1,200 14,400
Cost of goods manufactured at
standard cost ................................. $16,800 $19,200 $4,800 $40,800
Add: Variance allocation....................... 1,440 200 (240) 1,400
Allocation of discounts lost on
purchases ............................... 80 80
Cost of goods manufactured at actual
cost.................................................. $18,320 $19,400 $4,560 $42,280
P19-9 APPENDIX
Conver-
Cotton sion
Cloth Dyes cost
Units completed and transferred out this period........ 3,000 3,000 3,000
Less all units in beginning inventory........................... 1,000 1,000 1,000
Equivalent units started and completed this period .. 2,000 2,000 2,000
Add equivalent units required to complete
beginning inventory ................................................. 0 0 750
Add equivalent units in ending inventory.................... 750 750 250
Equivalent units of production this period.................. 2,750 2,750 3,000
Multiply by standard quantity of input per unit
of product.................................................................. 2 yards 1 pint 1
/2 hour
Standard quantity of input allowed for work
produced during the period .................................... 5,500 2,750 1,500
Accounts Receivable (3,100 units sold × $14 sales price) ... 43,400
Sales ..................................................................................... 43,400
Cost of Goods Sold (3,100 units × $10.50 standard cost) .... 32,550
Finished Goods ................................................................... 32,550
P19-10 APPENDIX
CASES
C19-1
(1) The quotation implies that “actual” manufacturing costs form the preferable basis
for inventory costing because they were incurred in producing the inventory.
The notion that actual costs are the only acceptable costs for inventory pur-
poses has been challenged by advocates of standard costs. Accountants who
advocate using standard costs for reporting purposes believe that standard
costs are more representative of the true cost of the product than actual costs.
They maintain that variances are measures of abnormal inefficiencies or abnor-
mal efficiencies; therefore, variances cannot be inventoried and should be imme-
diately recognized in determining net income of the period rather than prorated
to inventories and cost of goods sold. Thus, the costs attached to the product
are the costs that should have been incurred, not the costs that were incurred.
Many accountants believe that variances do not have to be inventoried as
long as standards are currently attainable. But if standards are not up to date, or
if they reflect theoretical performance rather than performance under reasonably
efficient conditions, then, conceptually, the variances should be split between
the portion that reflects departures from attainable standards and the portion
that does not.
Most accountants agree that unfavorable variances resulting from the differ-
ence between standards based on theoretical performance and those based on
normal performance should be treated as product costs and prorated to inven-
tories and cost of goods sold. There is less agreement relating to variances
resulting from the difference between actual performance and standards based
on normal (attainable) performance. Standard cost advocates believe that these
variances should be expensed because they represent abnormal conditions.
Many other accountants believe that these variances represent part of the actual
cost of producing the goods and, therefore, should be treated as product costs
and prorated to inventories and cost of goods sold.
(2) The three most appropriate alternative methods of variance disposition would
require the following entries:
(a) Cost of Goods Sold ............................................ 500
Finished Goods Inventory .................................. 1,000
Variance .......................................................... 1,500
(b) Cost of Goods Sold............................................. 1,500
Variance .......................................................... 1,500
(c) Finished Goods Inventory .................................. 1,500
Variance .......................................................... 1,500
19-26 Chapter 19
C19-1 (Concluded)
(3) The first journal entry is in accordance with the discussion in part (1) as the most
appropriate method of handling variances. Cost of Goods Sold is charged with
the excess cost above what it should have taken to complete the project, based
on a normal (attainable) standard. The costs (variances) resulting from the differ-
ence between the theoretical standard and the normal standard should be pro-
rated to cost of goods sold and inventories, based on the relative proportion of
the associated cost contained in each. In the situation presented, the entire
$1,000 is charged to Finished Goods Inventory instead of being prorated to
inventories and cost and goods sold because the production is included solely
in finished goods inventory.
The second journal entry can be justified as an appropriate method for dis-
position of the variance primarily on practical considerations but has little theo-
retical justification. The practice of charging all variances to Cost of Goods Sold
(or against current revenue) often has been justified on the grounds of simplic-
ity, convenience, and immateriality.
The last entry would be appropriate where it is desired to adjust the standard
cost inventory to actual costs. Many accountants would advocate this entry in
the circumstances presented because the inventory would then be stated at
actual costs of production. However, when this method of variance disposition
is followed, the asset inventory will be carried on the financial statements at an
amount that exceeds the cost that should have been incurred. Thus, inefficien-
cies in operations are being capitalized as assets in the financial statements
when this method is applied.