Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Anupam Chakrabarti
2
The assumption generally made in limit analysis is that the moment-
curvature relation is an idealised bilinear elasto-plastic relation
This has validity only if the section is adequately under-reinforced and the
reinforcing steel has a well-defined yield plateau.
Formation of Plastic hinge
With the idealised M – ϕ relation, the ultimate moment of resistance (MuR) is assumed to
have been reached at a ‘critical’ section in a flexural member with the yielding of the tension
steel
On further straining (increase in curvature: ϕ > ϕy), the moment at the section cannot
increase. However, the section ‘yields’, and the curvature continues to increase under a
constant moment (M = MuR)
In general (with bending moment varying along the length of the member), the zone of
‘yielding’ spreads over a small region in the immediate neighbourhood of the section under
consideration, permitting continued rotation, as though a ‘hinge’ is present at the section, but
one that continues to resist a fixed moment MuR. A plastic hinge is said to have formed at the
section
If the structure is statically indeterminate, it is still stable after the formation of a plastic
hinge, and for further loading, it behaves as a modified structure with a hinge at the plastic
hinge location (and one less degree of indeterminacy)
It can continue to carry additional loading (with formation of additional plastic hinges) until
the limit state of collapse is reached on account of one of the following reasons:
formation of sufficient number of plastic hinges, to convert the structure (or a part of it) into a
‘mechanism’
limitation in ductile behaviour (i.e., curvature ϕ reaching the ultimate value ϕmax, or, in other
words a plastic hinge reaching its ultimate rotation capacity) at any one plastic hinge location,
resulting in local crushing of concrete at that section
Example: Limit analysis
Loading on beam
𝑤𝑤1 𝑙𝑙 2 𝑤𝑤1 𝑙𝑙 2
𝑅𝑅𝐴𝐴 × 𝑙𝑙 − + =0
2 8
𝑹𝑹𝑨𝑨 = 𝟎𝟎. 𝟑𝟑𝟑𝟑𝟑𝟑𝒘𝒘𝟏𝟏 𝒍𝒍
Bending moment at any section in span AB
𝑤𝑤1 𝑥𝑥 2
𝑀𝑀𝑥𝑥 = 𝑅𝑅𝐴𝐴 𝑥𝑥 − −−− −(2)
2
Bending moment up to limit of elastic phase
Maximum bending moment in the span AB will be where the shear force is zero, i.e.
𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑥𝑥
= 0 ⇒ 𝑅𝑅𝐴𝐴 − 𝑤𝑤1 𝑥𝑥 = 0
𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑
0.375𝑤𝑤1 𝑙𝑙
𝑥𝑥 = = 𝟎𝟎. 𝟑𝟑𝟑𝟑𝟑𝟑𝟑𝟑
𝑤𝑤1
Substitute ‘x-value’ in equation (2)
2
𝑤𝑤1 × 0.375𝑙𝑙
𝑀𝑀(𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴)𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚 = 0.375𝑤𝑤1 𝑙𝑙 × 0.375𝑙𝑙 − = 𝟎𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝒘𝒘𝟏𝟏 𝒍𝒍𝟐𝟐 = 𝟎𝟎. 𝟓𝟓𝟓𝟓𝟓𝟓𝟓𝟓𝑴𝑴𝒖𝒖𝒖𝒖
2
(if 0.125𝑤𝑤1 𝑙𝑙 2 = 1𝑀𝑀𝑢𝑢𝑢𝑢 then 0.0703𝑤𝑤1 𝑙𝑙2 = 0.5624𝑀𝑀𝑢𝑢𝑢𝑢 )
Plastic hinge at continuous support
• Now, increase the load on the beam to 𝑤𝑤2 = 𝑤𝑤 > 𝑤𝑤1 , the beam behaves as a two-span beam with a
hinge at support B and the span moment alone increases while the support moment remains constant
at MuR
• Assuming that the support section is sufficiently under-reinforced such that it will not break down prior
to the formation of the next plastic hinge, this phase of behaviour will continue until the peak moment in
the span reaches MuR
𝑤𝑤2 × 𝑥𝑥 2 𝑤𝑤2 𝑙𝑙 − 𝑥𝑥 2
𝑀𝑀𝑢𝑢𝑢𝑢 = 2𝑀𝑀𝑢𝑢𝑢𝑢 = −− −(3)
2 2 A B
2
𝑤𝑤2 𝑙𝑙 − 𝑥𝑥 2 𝑙𝑙 − 𝑥𝑥 2
𝑤𝑤2 𝑥𝑥 = ⇒ 𝑥𝑥 =
2 2
𝒙𝒙 = 𝟎𝟎. 𝟒𝟒𝟒𝟒𝟒𝟒𝟒𝟒𝟒𝟒
Substitute x value in equation (3)
Limit analysis
𝒘𝒘𝟐𝟐 𝒍𝒍𝟐𝟐
𝑴𝑴𝒖𝒖𝒖𝒖 =
𝟏𝟏𝟏𝟏. 𝟔𝟔𝟔𝟔𝟔𝟔
11.656𝑀𝑀𝑢𝑢𝑢𝑢
𝒘𝒘𝟐𝟐 = = 𝟏𝟏. 𝟒𝟒𝟒𝟒𝟒𝟒𝟏𝟏
𝑙𝑙2
(A)
Reduction in peak negative moments
−
High support moment 𝑀𝑀(𝐸𝐸) demands large section beam or limited cross-section with large amount of
reinforcement
−
In such situations, it is desirable to reduce the design moment at the support to the value C1𝑀𝑀(𝐸𝐸) and
correspondingly increase span (positive) moments which are otherwise low
The % reduction in the support moment given by:
𝛿𝛿𝑀𝑀 = 1 − 𝐶𝐶1 × 100
− −
Consequent to a reduction in the support moment from 𝑀𝑀(𝐸𝐸) to 𝐶𝐶1 𝑀𝑀(𝐸𝐸) , there is an increase in the design
+ +
(‘positive’) moment in the span region from 𝑀𝑀(𝐸𝐸) to 𝐶𝐶2 𝑀𝑀(𝐸𝐸) , where the factor 𝐶𝐶2 obviously is greater than
unity. Accordingly, as indicated in Figure
where the subscript (L) represents limit analysis. The factor C2 (indicating the increase in the elastic
span moment 𝑀𝑀𝐸𝐸+ ) depends on the factor C1. The factor C1is fixed (based on the percentage
reduction desired), and the factor C2 has to be determined for design by considering ‘limit analysis’
2
𝑤𝑤𝑢𝑢 𝑙𝑙 𝐶𝐶1 𝑀𝑀𝐸𝐸− 𝑙𝑙 𝐶𝐶1 𝑀𝑀𝐸𝐸− 𝑤𝑤𝑢𝑢 𝑙𝑙 𝐶𝐶1 𝑀𝑀𝐸𝐸−
𝐶𝐶2 𝑀𝑀𝐸𝐸+ = − − − −
2 𝑙𝑙 2 𝑤𝑤𝑢𝑢 𝑙𝑙 2 2 𝑤𝑤𝑢𝑢 𝑙𝑙
𝟐𝟐
𝒘𝒘𝒖𝒖 𝒍𝒍 𝟏𝟏 𝑪𝑪𝟏𝟏 𝑴𝑴−
𝑬𝑬 𝟏𝟏
∴ 𝑪𝑪𝟐𝟐 𝑀𝑀𝐸𝐸+ = + − 𝑪𝑪𝟏𝟏 𝑴𝑴𝑬𝑬−
𝟖𝟖 𝟐𝟐𝒘𝒘𝒖𝒖 𝑳𝑳 𝟐𝟐
50 36.1
Redistributed moment
Recommendations of IS Code (IS 456) for Moment Redistribution
Section 37.1.1
Limit Equilibrium
The redistributed moments must be in a state of static equilibrium with the factored loads at the limit
state
Serviceability
The ultimate moment of resistance (𝑀𝑀𝑢𝑢𝑢𝑢) at any section should not be less than 70 percent of the
factored moment (𝑀𝑀𝑢𝑢, max) at that section, as obtained from the elastic moment envelope (considering
all loading combinations).
In other words, the flexural strength at any section should not be less than that given by the elastic
factored moment envelope, scaled by a factor of 0.7
This restriction is aimed at ensuring that plastic hinge formation does not take place under normal
service loads, and even if it does take place, the yielding of the steel will not be so significant as to
result in excessive crack-widths and deflections
value of 70% is arrived at as the ratio of service loads to ultimate loads with respect to load
combinations involving a uniform load factor of 1.5, as 1/1.5 = 0.67 ≅ 0.7
Low Demand for High Plastic Hinge Rotation Capacities
The reduction in the elastic factored moment (‘negative’ or ‘positive’) at any section due to a particular
combination of factored loads should not exceed 30 percent of the absolute maximum factored
moment (𝑀𝑀𝑢𝑢, max), as obtained from the envelope of factored elastic moments (considering all loading
combinations).
Although the basis for this clause in the Code (Cl. 37.1.1.c) is different from the previous clause, which
is based on the idea of preventing the formation of plastic hinges at service loads, for the case of
gravity loading, in effect, this clause is no different.
However, in the design of lateral load resisting frames (with number of storeys exceeding four), the
Code (Cl. 37.1.1.e) imposes an additional overriding restriction. The reduction in the elastic factored
moment is restricted to 10 percent of 𝑀𝑀𝑢𝑢, max. Thus
This restriction is intended to ensure that the ductility requirements at the plastic hinge locations are
not excessive
Adequate Plastic Hinge Rotation Capacity
The design of the critical section (plastic hinge location) should be such that it is sufficiently under-
reinforced, with a low neutral axis depth factor (xu/d), satisfying
(Section 37.1.1.d)
• where δM denotes the percentage reduction in the maximum factored elastic moment (Mu,max)
elastic at the section
For singly reinforced rectangular beam sections, the expression for xu/d is given below, which is
repeated here for convenience, with MuR = Mu
𝑀𝑀𝑢𝑢
, 𝑅𝑅 =
𝑏𝑏𝑏𝑏 2
Moment Redistribution in Beams
Low values of xu/d (and, thus large values of δΜ) are generally not possible in beams without resorting
to very large sections, which may be uneconomical. However, even with the extreme case of a
balanced section (with xu = xu,max), it can be shown, by applying
and
• Thus, it is seen that a limited moment distribution (for example, up to 12.1 percent in the case of Fe 415
steel) is possible, even with the limiting neutral axis depth permitted for design.
Example 1
Analyse a three-span continuous beam (with equal spans l ), subjected to a uniformly
distributed load w per unit length, to determine the critical ‘positive’ moments M1 or MAB and
MCD (in the end span) and M2 or MBC (in the interior span), as well as the ‘negative’ moment
M3 or MB and MC at the continuous support. Assume that the dead load (wD) and live load
(wL) components of the total load (w) are equal (wD= wL= 0.5w and wD+wL= w). Also assume
all spans to have the same cross-section. Compare the moment coefficients obtained by
a) Elastic analysis considering total load w on all spans
b) Elastic analysis considering ‘pattern loading’
c) Code recommendations for moment coefficients
Solution
Find out elastic moments for above beam using theorem of Three Moment:
𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚 𝑀𝑀𝐴𝐴 = 𝑀𝑀𝐷𝐷 = 0 𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎 𝑀𝑀𝐵𝐵 = 𝑀𝑀𝐶𝐶 (𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠)
For span AB and BC:
𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙 3 𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙 3
𝑀𝑀𝐴𝐴 𝑙𝑙 + 2 × 2𝑙𝑙𝑀𝑀𝐵𝐵 + 𝑀𝑀𝐶𝐶 𝑙𝑙 = − −
4 4
𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙 3
4𝑀𝑀𝐵𝐵 𝑙𝑙 + 𝑀𝑀𝐶𝐶 𝑙𝑙 = − −−−− −(1)
2
Similarly for span BC and CD:
𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙 3
𝑀𝑀𝐵𝐵 𝑙𝑙 + 4𝑀𝑀𝐶𝐶 𝑙𝑙 = − −−− −(2)
2
Solve equations (1) and (2),
𝑴𝑴𝟑𝟑 = 𝑴𝑴𝑩𝑩 = 𝑴𝑴𝑪𝑪 = −𝟎𝟎. 𝟏𝟏𝟏𝟏𝒍𝒍𝟐𝟐
Bending moment about any section in span AB: Max. bending moment in span BC:
Moment about ‘B’: Moment about ‘C’:
𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙 2 𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙 2
𝑅𝑅𝐴𝐴 𝑙𝑙 − + 0.1𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙 2 = 0 𝑅𝑅𝐵𝐵 𝑙𝑙 − − 0.1𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙 2 + 0.1𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙 2 = 0
2 2
𝑅𝑅𝐴𝐴 = 0.4𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 𝑅𝑅𝐵𝐵 = 0.5𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤
𝑤𝑤𝑥𝑥 2 𝑤𝑤𝑥𝑥 2
𝑀𝑀𝑥𝑥 = 0.4𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 𝑥𝑥 − −−−− −(3) 𝑀𝑀𝑥𝑥 = 0.5𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 𝑥𝑥 − − 0.1𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙 2
2 2
𝑑𝑑𝑀𝑀𝑥𝑥
𝑑𝑑𝑀𝑀𝑥𝑥
Maximum bending moment occurs where =0 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑
𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑
From equation (3) 0.5𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 − 𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 = 0
𝑅𝑅𝐴𝐴 − 𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 = 0 𝒙𝒙 = 𝟎𝟎. 𝟓𝟓𝒍𝒍
𝒙𝒙 = 𝟎𝟎. 𝟒𝟒𝟒𝟒 𝑴𝑴𝟐𝟐 = 𝑴𝑴𝑩𝑩𝑩𝑩 = 𝟎𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝒍𝒍𝟐𝟐
Substitute x value in equation (3)
Find out elastic moments for above beam using theorem of three moment:
𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚 𝑀𝑀𝐴𝐴 = 𝑀𝑀𝐷𝐷 = 0 𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎 𝑀𝑀𝐵𝐵 = 𝑀𝑀𝐶𝐶 (𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠)
For span AB and BC:
𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙3 𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙 3
𝑀𝑀𝐴𝐴 𝑙𝑙 + 2 × 2𝑙𝑙𝑀𝑀𝐵𝐵 + 𝑀𝑀𝐶𝐶 𝑙𝑙 = − −
8 4
𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙 3 𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙 3
4𝑀𝑀𝐵𝐵 𝑙𝑙 + 𝑀𝑀𝐶𝐶 𝑙𝑙 = − − −−−− −(4)
4 8
Similarly for span BC and CD:
𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙 3 𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙 3
𝑀𝑀𝐵𝐵 𝑙𝑙 + 4𝑀𝑀𝐶𝐶 𝑙𝑙 = − − −−−− −(5)
8 4
Solve equations (4) and (5),
𝑴𝑴𝟑𝟑 = 𝑴𝑴𝑩𝑩 = 𝑴𝑴𝑪𝑪 = −𝟎𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝒍𝒍𝟐𝟐
Bending moment about any section in span AB: Max. bending moment in span BC:
Moment about ‘B’: Moment about ‘C’:
𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙 2 𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙 2
𝑅𝑅𝐴𝐴 𝑙𝑙 − + 0.075𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙2 = 0 𝑅𝑅𝐵𝐵 𝑙𝑙 − − 0.075𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙 2 + 0.075𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙 2 = 0
2 4
𝑅𝑅𝐴𝐴 = 0.425𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 𝑅𝑅𝐴𝐴 = 0.25𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤
𝑤𝑤𝑥𝑥 2 𝑤𝑤𝑥𝑥 2
𝑀𝑀𝑥𝑥 = 0.425𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 𝑥𝑥 − −−−− −(6) 𝑀𝑀𝑥𝑥 = 0.25𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 𝑥𝑥 − − 0.075𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙 2
2 4
𝑑𝑑𝑀𝑀𝑥𝑥
𝑑𝑑𝑀𝑀𝑥𝑥
Maximum bending moment occurs where =0 =0
𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑
From equation (6) 0.25𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 − 0.5𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 = 0
𝑅𝑅𝐴𝐴 − 𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 = 0 𝒙𝒙 = 𝟎𝟎. 𝟓𝟓𝒍𝒍
𝒙𝒙 = 𝟎𝟎. 𝟒𝟒𝟒𝟒𝟒𝟒𝟒𝟒 𝑴𝑴𝑩𝑩𝑩𝑩 = −𝟎𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝒍𝒍𝟐𝟐
Substitute x value in equation (6)
Find out elastic moments for above beam using theorem of three moment:
𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚 𝑀𝑀𝐴𝐴 = 𝑀𝑀𝐷𝐷 = 0 𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎𝑎 𝑀𝑀𝐵𝐵 = 𝑀𝑀𝐶𝐶 (𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠𝑠)
For span AB and BC:
𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙3 𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙 3
𝑀𝑀𝐴𝐴 𝑙𝑙 + 2 × 2𝑙𝑙𝑀𝑀𝐵𝐵 + 𝑀𝑀𝐶𝐶 𝑙𝑙 = − −
8 4
𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙 3 𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙 3
4𝑀𝑀𝐵𝐵 𝑙𝑙 + 𝑀𝑀𝐶𝐶 𝑙𝑙 = − − −−−− −(7)
8 4
Similarly for span BC and CD:
𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙 3 𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙 3
𝑀𝑀𝐵𝐵 𝑙𝑙 + 4𝑀𝑀𝐶𝐶 𝑙𝑙 = − − −−−− −(8)
4 8
Solve equations (7) and (8),
𝑴𝑴𝟑𝟑 = 𝑴𝑴𝑩𝑩 = 𝑴𝑴𝑪𝑪 = −𝟎𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝒍𝒍𝟐𝟐
Max. bending moment in span BC:
Bending moment about any section in span AB:
Moment about ‘B’: Moment about ‘C’:
2
𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙 𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙 2
𝑅𝑅𝐴𝐴 𝑙𝑙 − + 0.075𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙2 = 0 𝑅𝑅𝐵𝐵 𝑙𝑙 − − 0.075𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙 2 + 0.075𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙 2 = 0
4 2
𝑤𝑤𝑥𝑥 2
𝑤𝑤𝑥𝑥 2 𝑀𝑀𝑥𝑥 = 0.5𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 𝑥𝑥 − − 0.075𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙 2
𝑀𝑀𝑥𝑥 = 0.175𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 𝑥𝑥 − −−−− −(9) 2
4 𝑑𝑑𝑀𝑀𝑥𝑥
𝑑𝑑𝑀𝑀𝑥𝑥 =0
Maximum bending moment occurs where =0 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑
𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑
0.5𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 − 𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 = 0
From equation (9)
𝑅𝑅𝐴𝐴 − 0.5𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 = 0 𝒙𝒙 = 𝟎𝟎. 𝟓𝟓𝒍𝒍
Find out elastic moments for above beam using theorem of three moment:
𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒𝑒 𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚 𝑀𝑀𝐴𝐴 = 𝑀𝑀𝐷𝐷 = 0
For span AB and BC:
𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙3 𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙 3
𝑀𝑀𝐴𝐴 𝑙𝑙 + 2 × 2𝑙𝑙𝑀𝑀𝐵𝐵 + 𝑀𝑀𝐶𝐶 𝑙𝑙 = − −
4 4
𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙 3
4𝑀𝑀𝐵𝐵 𝑙𝑙 + 𝑀𝑀𝐶𝐶 𝑙𝑙 = − −−−− −(10)
2
Similarly for span BC and CD:
𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙3 𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙 3
𝑀𝑀𝐵𝐵 𝑙𝑙 + 4𝑀𝑀𝐶𝐶 𝑙𝑙 = − − −−− −(11)
4 8
Solve equations (1) and (2),
𝑴𝑴𝟑𝟑 = 𝑴𝑴𝑩𝑩 = −𝟎𝟎. 𝟏𝟏𝟏𝟏𝟖𝟖𝟖𝟖𝒘𝒘𝒍𝒍𝟐𝟐 𝑴𝑴𝑪𝑪 = −𝟎𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝒍𝒍𝟐𝟐
Bending moment about any section in span AB: Max. bending moment in span BC:
Moment about ‘B’: Moment about ‘C’:
𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙 2 𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙 2
𝑅𝑅𝐴𝐴 𝑙𝑙 − + 0.1082𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙2 = 0 𝑅𝑅𝐵𝐵 𝑙𝑙 − + 0.0667𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙2 − 0.1082𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙 2 = 0
2 2
𝑅𝑅𝐴𝐴 = 0.3918𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 𝑅𝑅𝐵𝐵 = 0.5412𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤
𝑤𝑤𝑥𝑥 2 𝑤𝑤𝑥𝑥 2
𝑀𝑀𝑥𝑥 = 0.3918𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 𝑥𝑥 − −−−− −(12) 𝑀𝑀𝑥𝑥 = 0.5412𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 𝑥𝑥 − − 0.1082𝑤𝑤𝑙𝑙2
2 2
𝑑𝑑𝑀𝑀𝑥𝑥
𝑑𝑑𝑀𝑀𝑥𝑥
Maximum bending moment occurs where =0 =0
𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑 𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑
From equation (12) 0.5412𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 − 𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 = 0
𝑅𝑅𝐴𝐴 − 𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤 = 0 𝒙𝒙 = 𝟎𝟎. 𝟓𝟓𝟓𝟓𝟓𝟓𝟓𝟓𝒍𝒍
𝒙𝒙 = 𝟎𝟎. 𝟑𝟑𝟑𝟑𝟑𝟑𝟑𝟑𝟑𝟑 𝑴𝑴𝑩𝑩𝑩𝑩 = 𝟎𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝒍𝒍𝟐𝟐
Substitute x value in equation (12)
𝑴𝑴𝟏𝟏 = 𝑴𝑴𝑨𝑨𝑨𝑨 = 𝟎𝟎. 𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝒍𝒍𝟐𝟐
1 1
𝑀𝑀1 = + 0.5𝑤𝑤 𝑙𝑙2 + = +0.0917𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤2
12 10
Span moments� 1 1
𝑀𝑀2 = + 0.5𝑤𝑤 𝑙𝑙2 + = +0.0729𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤2
16 12
1 1
Support moments 𝑀𝑀3 = − 0.5𝑤𝑤 𝑙𝑙2 + = −0.1056𝑤𝑤𝑤𝑤2
10 9
Comparison of results
Span moments Support moment
Method M3
M1 M2
(a) Total load on all spans +0.0800 +0.0250 -0.1000
(b) Pattern loading +0.0903 -0.01250 -0.1082
+0.0500
(c) Code coefficients +0.0917 +0.0729 -0.1056
Comments
• The simplified consideration of total loading on all spans [case (a)] results in a 50 percent
under-estimation in the ‘positive’ mid-span moment (M2) in the interior span; M1 and M3
are also under-estimated, but marginally
• The Code coefficient method over-estimates the mid-span ‘positive’ moment M2 in the
interior span by as much as 45.8 percent and the moment M1 in the end span by 1.5%
• in general, the relatively crude method of considering total loads on all spans
results in an non-conservative design, whereas the use of Code moment coefficients
results in a relatively conservative design.
Example 2
(a) Based on the elastic factored moment envelope obtainable from Example 1, design
the flexural reinforcement in the three-span continuous beam of Example 1, given the
following data:
w = 30 kN/m (wD = 15 kN/m, wL = 15 kN/m); l = 8.0 m
Assume a partial load factor of 1.5 for both dead loads and live loads (as per IS Code).
Use M 20 concrete and Fe 415 steel.
(b) Redesign the three-span continuous beam by applying moment redistribution (to the
extent permitted by the Code)
Solution:
a)
Factored load w = 1.5 × 30 = 45 kN/m, wu l2 = 45 × (8.0)2 = 2880 kNm
The elastic factored moment envelope, based on the results of Example 1, is shown fig
Min./max. moments in
span AB/BC exp 1
Max./min. moments in
span AB/BC exp 1
311.7 × 106
𝑑𝑑𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚𝑚 = = 611.6
2.778 × 300
Assume overall depth D = 700 mm and d ≈ 655 mm (for an economical design)
Design of flexural reinforcement:
Considering fck = 20 MPa, fy = 415 MPa, b = 300 mm, d = 655 mm, the following results are
obtained
1. For Mu1 = + 260.1 kNm, R = 2.021 MPa ⇒ pt = 0.647 ⇒ (Ast)reqd = 1271 mm2 Provide 2–25φ
+ 1–20φ at bottom in the end span [Ast = 1296 mm2 > 1271]
2. For Mu2 = + 144.0 kNm, R = 1.119 MPa ⇒ pt = 0.333 ⇒ (Ast)reqd = 655 mm2 Provide 2–16φ +
1–20φ at bottom in the central span [Ast = 716 mm2 > 654] Mu2 = – 0.0125 wul2 = 36 kNm
is accommodated by the nominal top steel (2–16φ bars) provided
3. For Mu3 = – 311.7 kNm, R = 2.422 MPa ⇒ pt = 0.805 ⇒ (Ast)reqd = 1583 mm2 Provide
2–28 φ + 2–16 φ at top [Ast = 1634 mm2 > 1583] up to, say 0.3l on the end span side,
and 0.4l on the central span side of the continuous support; beyond this, the 2–16 φ bars
may be extended over the span regions as nominal top steel
(b) Moment Redistribution
The maximum reduction in moment permitted by the Code is 30 percent, corresponding to which, the
design moment at the continuous support is given by
� u3 = 0.7 Mu3 = 0.7 × – 0.1082 wul2
𝑀𝑀
= – 0.07574 wul2= – 218.2 kNm
Assuming b = 300 mm and d = 655 mm (as before)
which satisfies the Code requirement xu/d ≤ 0.6 – 30/100 = 0.30 (for 30% reduction in Mu3). Hence, the
desired plastic rotation capacity is ensured.
Now, the increase of AB span moment corresponding to decreased support moment:
Find out moment about B:
𝑤𝑤𝑢𝑢 × 𝑙𝑙2
𝑅𝑅𝐴𝐴 × 𝑙𝑙 − + 0.07574𝑤𝑤𝑢𝑢 𝑙𝑙2 = 0 ⟹ 𝑅𝑅𝐴𝐴 = 0.424𝑤𝑤𝑢𝑢 𝑙𝑙
2
Moment at any section of AB:
𝑤𝑤𝑢𝑢 𝑥𝑥 2
𝑀𝑀𝑥𝑥 = 0.424𝑤𝑤𝑢𝑢 𝑙𝑙𝑥𝑥 −
2
𝑑𝑑𝑀𝑀𝑥𝑥
Maximum bending moment occurs where =0
𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑
𝑥𝑥 = 0.424𝑙𝑙
Max. AB span bending moment (Substitute x value in 𝑀𝑀𝑥𝑥 ) 𝑀𝑀𝐴𝐴𝐴𝐴 = 0.09𝑤𝑤𝑢𝑢 𝑙𝑙2
Determine max. BC span moment:
Take moment about C:
𝑤𝑤𝑢𝑢 𝑙𝑙2
𝑅𝑅𝐵𝐵 𝑙𝑙 − − 0.07574𝑤𝑤𝑢𝑢 𝑙𝑙2 + 0.0748𝑤𝑤𝑢𝑢 𝑙𝑙2 = 0 ⟹ 𝑅𝑅𝐴𝐴 = 0.5𝑤𝑤𝑢𝑢 𝑙𝑙
2
Moment at any section of BC:
𝑤𝑤𝑢𝑢 𝑥𝑥 2
𝑀𝑀𝑥𝑥 = 0.5 𝑤𝑤𝑢𝑢 𝑙𝑙𝑙𝑙 − − 0.07574𝑤𝑤𝑢𝑢 𝑙𝑙2
2
𝑑𝑑𝑀𝑀𝑥𝑥
Maximum bending moment occurs where =0
𝑑𝑑𝑑𝑑
𝑥𝑥 = 0.5𝑙𝑙
Max. BC span bending moment (Substitute x value in 𝑀𝑀𝑥𝑥 ) 𝑀𝑀𝐵𝐵𝐵𝐵 = 0.049𝑤𝑤𝑢𝑢 𝑙𝑙2
Bending moment envelope after redistribution:
• For the loading pattern shown in example1(b), the possibility of redistribution has been recognised by
reducing the design flexural strength at the continuous support from the elastic solution value of –0.1082
� u3= –0.07574 wul2.
wul2to 𝑀𝑀
• By performing an analysis of the continuous beam with a plastic hinge at the continuous support the
maximum +ve moments in end span and centre span are
Considering fck = 20 MPa, fy = 415 MPa, b = 300 mm, d = 655 mm (as before), for
� u1= + 260.1 kNm, (which is identical to Part(a) of this Example).
𝑀𝑀
Provide 2–25 φ + 1–20 φ at bottom in the end span (Ast = 1296 mm2>1256).
40