Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Akadémiai Kiadó is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Studia
Musicologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae
Peter BARTOK
Homosassa
' Bar references are to the revised score; Tibor Serly's corresponding bar numbers appear in parentheses.
The music in these bars, sketched by the composer in AS, appears in the
key of A in Tibor Serly's score. In the revised version it was lowered back
to AW, but it seemed desirable to analyze the reason for the choise of key,
to determine the probable purpose for the new key in the sketch, and to
question whether the composer himself may have raised it to A at the time
of final scoring.
The preceding section up to bar 110 ends in A; bars 111-114
are a transition arriving to AS in bar 1 14. The last movement, up to here, is
Rumanian in character, but there is a change of mood at bar 114, where
the orchestra accompaniment is a drone-like chord consisting of AS and ES
and a "new" tune is introduced, first by an orchestra instrument at bar 1 17
( 1 1 6), then by the viola solo at bar 1 25 ( 1 24). The sketch here contains the
direction "harmonics" for the viola solo, omitted in Tibor Serly's score.
It was concluded, in examining the circumstances, that my father's
choice of a new key was probably deliberate: the change of key coincided
with a change of mood, as if to accentuate, stress, this change. Modulation
occurs in the three transitory bars those would serve less purpose if the
key remained A. There should be no qualms in restoring the half step
downward shift at bar 114, as found in the sketch; my father must have
designed this change for a reason.
It was pointed out previously that the music in this section contained
a bagpipe tune (Halsey Stevens);2 that it could be Scottish in character,
perhaps in deference to Primrose's origin [David Dalton].3 Halsey Stevens
also mentioned that perhaps the opening theme is derived from the same
tune as what appears beginning in bar 117 (116). Nelson Dellamaggiore
who did most of the work connected with revising the score sug-
gested that the accompaniment of repeated A;-ES chords perhaps
represents the bagpipe's drones, and the direction "harmonics" to the solo
viola at bar 125 (124) may be a deliberate introduction of a tone character
reminiscent of the bagpipe's chanter. Thus, this direction appears in the
revised score, despite the added difficulty the production of the harmonics
involves for the soloist.
2 The Life and Music of Bela Bartok, Oxford University Press, 1953 p. 255.
3 David Dalton, Document submitted to the graduate faculty of the School of Music in partial fulfillment
of the requirements for the degree, Doctor of Music, Indiana University, May 1970 p. 60.
(3'
k 82L;b > | * L I 5 | b 'L) ' 1Sa
; # A tempo tn
4 Seventy Scottish Songs, selected and arranged by Helen Hopekirk, O 1992 by Dover Publications, New
York, p. 47 (reprinted by permission).
5 Letter of William Primrose, January 1945, to Bela Bart6k.
6 Letter of Bela Bartok to Peter Bartok, February 8, 1945.
About mid-July I was just planning to write you a rather desponding letter, explalning
you the various difficulties I am in. But, then there stirred some viola-concerto ideas
which gradually crystallized themselves, so that I am able now to tell you that I hope
to write the work, and maybe finish at least its draft in F5 weeks, if nothing happens
in the meantime which would prevent my work.
By September 8th he was able to advise Primrose that the draft was
ready:
I am very glad to be able to tell you that your viola concerto is ready in draft so that
only the score has to be written which means a purely mechanical work, so to speak.
These facts suggest a scenario that, although it fits all the known
facts, in the absence of more details can only be regarded as speculation:
in 1945, probably related to the recent successes of the Violin Concerto
No. 2 and Concertofor Orchestra, he was virtually inundated with work:
the commissions received and the composition he wanted to write. At the
first opportunity beginning of the summer at Saranac Lake, New York
he started drafting the piano concerto, for which ideas were already
chosen, such as bird calls noted down the previous year in Asheville,
North Carolina. It is probably not easy, even for an experienced composer
or writer, to concentrate simultaneously in two different creative channels;
as the piano concerto was making good progress, thoughts about a viola
concerto were relegated to second place.
Initially (in July) suitable ideas did not occur to him and he even con-
sidered to decline Primrose's commission, at least for the time being. But
then, perhaps when the inventive phase of the Piano Concerto No. 3 was
over and he could start the "mechanical work" of scoring it, an idea made
the Viola (^oncerto possible: Primrose was from Scotland; my father had
been there and was interested in Scottish bagpipe music. Why not make a
fragment of a bagpipe tune the nucleus of the concerto to be written for
the Scotsman? And so the little tune was invented (it is not suggested that
the phrase in question is an exact copy of a particular tune; rather, that it
was invented in the Scottish style), subjected to "development"-varia-
7 Ferenc Bonis, "Bartok Tanc-szvitjenek szuletese", in: AIodolat Bart(wknak es Kodalynak (Budapest:
P{iski, 1992).
Without going into many details we thank Denijs Dille for his con-
tributions-not only in this instance but for being always ready in all
other areas where his efforts could help Bela Bartok, and his music, to be
better known and understood. For his tireless research in determining er-
rors and corrections in the Hungarian Folk Song publications; investigat-
ing the circumstances surrounding the creation of Five Songs, Op. 15; his
publications, such as Documenta Bartokiana; determination of the Bartok
family tree, etc. Undoubtedly his presence, and the possibility of his be-
coming its Elrst director, played a role in the early establishment of the
Budapest Bartok Archivum. Without further words, we are grateful for all
you have done; happy birthday, Denijs Dille!